Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 8 (click to see context) from:
** "That's a bold strategy, Cotton. Let's see if it pays off for 'em/him/her." when someone does something risky or stupid, especially on Imgur. The use in-context was [[spoiler:Cotton pointing out that Average Joe's was ''forfeiting'' the match.]]
to:
** "That's a bold strategy, Cotton. Let's see if it pays off for 'em/him/her." when someone does something risky or stupid, especially on Imgur. The use in-context was [[spoiler:Cotton Cotton pointing out that Average [[spoiler:Average Joe's was ''forfeiting'' the match.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 8 (click to see context) from:
** "That's a bold strategy, Cotton. Let's see if it pays off for 'em/him/her." when someone does something risky or stupid, especially on Imgur.
to:
** "That's a bold strategy, Cotton. Let's see if it pays off for 'em/him/her." when someone does something risky or stupid, especially on Imgur. The use in-context was [[spoiler:Cotton pointing out that Average Joe's was ''forfeiting'' the match.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 8 (click to see context) from:
** "That's a bold strategy, Cotton. Let's see if it pays off for 'em/him/her." when someone does something risky, especially on Imgur.
to:
** "That's a bold strategy, Cotton. Let's see if it pays off for 'em/him/her." when someone does something risky, risky or stupid, especially on Imgur.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** "That's a bold strategy, Cotton. Let's see if it pays off for 'em/him/her." when someone does something risky, especially on Imgur.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** He still did survive cancer, and he's far from the only cheater in the sport during those years. Between 1999 and 2005, every single rider in top 3 of those [[TourDeFrance Tours]] have been heavily implicated, if not outright busted for doping. One would have to go outside top 10, sometimes even top 20, to make a clean podium.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Removed my own comment, which didn\'t seem to belong here.
Deleted line(s) 5 (click to see context) :
** He still did recover from cancer (which seems to be the major point), where he didn't quit. One could also argue that he won those five tours on equal terms. Every rider on the podiums 1999-2003 have been strongly implicated in (or outright busted for) doping, and you'd have to go far down the lists to find a podium of clean riders.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** He still did recover from cancer (which seems to be the major point), where he didn't quit. One could also argue that he won those five tours on equal terms. Every rider on the podiums 1999-2003 have been strongly implicated in (or outright busted for) doping, and you'd have to go far down the lists to find a podium of clean riders.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4,6 (click to see context) from:
* HarsherInHindsight: Lance Armstrong being stripped of his winnings (for blood doping, which is considered cheating) in 2012 changes the implications of the scene he appears in.
** You might want to wait for the actual verdict in that case. It has been announced (UCI aren't good at sticking to that stuff, so I'll have to see it before it happens) to be sent out to the public Monday the 22nd October 2012.
*** '''Now''' Armstrong's titles have been stripped.
** You might want to wait for the actual verdict in that case. It has been announced (UCI aren't good at sticking to that stuff, so I'll have to see it before it happens) to be sent out to the public Monday the 22nd October 2012.
*** '''Now''' Armstrong's titles have been stripped.
to:
* HarsherInHindsight: Lance Armstrong being stripped of his winnings (for for blood doping, which doping (which is considered cheating) in 2012 and his subsequent confession of the fact in 2013 changes the implications of the scene he appears in.
** You might want to wait for the actual verdict in that case. It has been announced (UCI aren't good at sticking to that stuff, so I'll have to see it before it happens) to be sent out to the public Monday the 22nd October 2012.
*** '''Now''' Armstrong's titles have been stripped.in.
** You might want to wait for the actual verdict in that case. It has been announced (UCI aren't good at sticking to that stuff, so I'll have to see it before it happens) to be sent out to the public Monday the 22nd October 2012.
*** '''Now''' Armstrong's titles have been stripped.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* MemeticMutation: Lance Armstrong's cameo is now being circulated as a ''joke'' around the Internet due to the athlete recently being stripped of his titles.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
...I on the other hand, didn\'t so I can write a much better explanation of what is wrong with that scene. However racial stereotypes aren\'t unfortunate implications they are... racial stereotypes, they\'re their own problem
Changed line(s) 12,14 (click to see context) from:
* UnfortunateImplications:
** Also, there are plenty of racial stereotypes in the movie. Asians in underwear, anyone?
*** Well, the game ''is'' sponsored by the [[DepartmentOfRedundancyDepartment American Dodgeball Association of America]] - therefore RefugeInAudacity kicks in, since it's made fairly clear that they're intentionally playing up those stereotypes. Just look at the German team.
** Also, there are plenty of racial stereotypes in the movie. Asians in underwear, anyone?
*** Well, the game ''is'' sponsored by the [[DepartmentOfRedundancyDepartment American Dodgeball Association of America]] - therefore RefugeInAudacity kicks in, since it's made fairly clear that they're intentionally playing up those stereotypes. Just look at the German team.
to:
* UnfortunateImplications:
** Also, there are plenty of racial stereotypes in the movie. Asians in underwear, anyone?
*** Well, the game ''is'' sponsored by the [[DepartmentOfRedundancyDepartment American Dodgeball Association of America]] - therefore RefugeInAudacity kicks in, since it's made fairly clearUnfortunateImplications: The revelation that they're intentionally playing up those stereotypes. Just look at Kate and her partner are bisexuals goes hand in hand with them turning out to also be incredibly easy and willing to engage in a menage a trois with Peter (especially with Kate's girlfriend who just met the German team.guy).
** Also, there are plenty of racial stereotypes in the movie. Asians in underwear, anyone?
*** Well, the game ''is'' sponsored by the [[DepartmentOfRedundancyDepartment American Dodgeball Association of America]] - therefore RefugeInAudacity kicks in, since it's made fairly clear
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
you seem to miss the point of why they mention she\'s a bisexual and what that means in the story.
Deleted line(s) 13 (click to see context) :
** The one bisexual in the movie is shown kissing her girlfriend, then kissing Peter. No breakups, nothing. She is assumed to date both her girlfriend and Peter. That is not how bisexuality usually works in today's society. They have a word for a relationship like that--it's not called "bisexuality", it's called "polygamy".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Deleted line(s) 2 (click to see context) :
** Considering that Peter most likely took the money because he thought Average Joe's would ''lose'', maybe not.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Ssh.
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* BatmanGambit: C'mon, tell me this isn't true: Near the end, White offers Peter a large sum of money to buy Average Joe's outright. You never see what happens, but the movie implies he refused the offer when they get into the finals. After they win the finals, however, White reveals that Peter took him up on the offer, and Average Joe's is now his. ''However'', it turns out Peter bet the money he got from selling the gym into his team winning, thus winning enough money to buy out Globogym and every gym it's a part of, ''including'' Average Joe's.
to:
* BatmanGambit: C'mon, tell me this isn't true: Near the end, White offers Peter a large sum of money to buy Average Joe's outright. You never see what happens, but the movie implies he refused the offer when they get into the finals. After they win the finals, however, White reveals that Peter took him up on the offer, and Average Joe's is now his. ''However'', it turns out Peter bet the money he got from selling the gym into his team winning, thus winning enough money to buy out Globogym and every gym it's a part of, ''including'' Average Joe's.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 7 (click to see context) from:
*** ''Now'' Armstrong's titles have been stripped.
to:
*** ''Now'' '''Now''' Armstrong's titles have been stripped.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
*** ''Now'' Armstrong's titles have been stripped.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** You might want to wait for the actual verdict in that case. It has been announced (UCI aren't good at sticking to that stuff, so I'll have to see it before it happens) to be sent out to the public Monday the 22nd October 2012.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** Considering that Peter most likely took the money because he thought Average Joe's would ''lose'', maybe not.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 10,13 (click to see context) from:
* UnfortunateImplications: The one bisexual in the movie is shown kissing her girlfriend, then kissing Peter. No breakups, nothing. She is assumed to date both her girlfriend and Peter. That is not how bisexuality usually works in today's society. They have a word for a relationship like that--it's not called "bisexuality", it's called "polygamy".
** It is possible to be bisexual ''and'' polygamist, mind. Bisexuality refers to sexual orientation. Polygamy and monogamy refer to the number of partners in the relationship.
*** The point, though, is that neither Kate nor her girlfriend ever explicitly identify themselves as polygamists, and no one considers their behavior unusual. The characters act as if polygamy and bisexuality are inherently intertwined, which they're not.
*** On the other hand, no one considers ''either'' bisexuality or polygamy as unusual in the first place so make of that what you will.
** It is possible to be bisexual ''and'' polygamist, mind. Bisexuality refers to sexual orientation. Polygamy and monogamy refer to the number of partners in the relationship.
*** The point, though, is that neither Kate nor her girlfriend ever explicitly identify themselves as polygamists, and no one considers their behavior unusual. The characters act as if polygamy and bisexuality are inherently intertwined, which they're not.
*** On the other hand, no one considers ''either'' bisexuality or polygamy as unusual in the first place so make of that what you will.
to:
* UnfortunateImplications: UnfortunateImplications:
** The one bisexual in the movie is shown kissing her girlfriend, then kissing Peter. No breakups, nothing. She is assumed to date both her girlfriend and Peter. That is not how bisexuality usually works in today's society. They have a word for a relationship like that--it's not called "bisexuality", it's called"polygamy".
** It is possible to be bisexual ''and'' polygamist, mind. Bisexuality refers to sexual orientation. Polygamy and monogamy refer to the number of partners in the relationship.
*** The point, though, is that neither Kate nor her girlfriend ever explicitly identify themselves as polygamists, and no one considers their behavior unusual. The characters act as if polygamy and bisexuality are inherently intertwined, which they're not.
*** On the other hand, no one considers ''either'' bisexuality or polygamy as unusual in the first place so make of that what you will."polygamy".
** The one bisexual in the movie is shown kissing her girlfriend, then kissing Peter. No breakups, nothing. She is assumed to date both her girlfriend and Peter. That is not how bisexuality usually works in today's society. They have a word for a relationship like that--it's not called "bisexuality", it's called
** It is possible to be bisexual ''and'' polygamist, mind. Bisexuality refers to sexual orientation. Polygamy and monogamy refer to the number of partners in the relationship.
*** The point, though, is that neither Kate nor her girlfriend ever explicitly identify themselves as polygamists, and no one considers their behavior unusual. The characters act as if polygamy and bisexuality are inherently intertwined, which they're not.
*** On the other hand, no one considers ''either'' bisexuality or polygamy as unusual in the first place so make of that what you will.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
No, that is not all. If you\'re not going to bother explaining why subsequent events make something funnier, don\'t add the example at all.
Changed line(s) 5,6 (click to see context) from:
* HilariousInHindsight: ChuckNorris. THAT IS ALL.
** It was funny enough when ESPN debuted "ESPN 3" (five more to go until a "real Ocho"), but in reality, a much smaller, independent network [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/America_One beat them to the concept.]]
** It was funny enough when ESPN debuted "ESPN 3" (five more to go until a "real Ocho"), but in reality, a much smaller, independent network [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/America_One beat them to the concept.]]
to:
* HilariousInHindsight: ChuckNorris. THAT IS ALL.
**It was funny enough when ESPN debuted "ESPN 3" (five more to go until a "real Ocho"), but in reality, a much smaller, independent network [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/America_One beat them to the concept.]]
**
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
* HarsherInHindsight: Lance Armstrong being stripped of his winnings for blood doping in 2012 changes the implications of the scene he appears in.
to:
* HarsherInHindsight: Lance Armstrong being stripped of his winnings for (for blood doping doping, which is considered cheating) in 2012 changes the implications of the scene he appears in.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* HarsherInHindsight: Lance Armstrong being stripped of his winnings for blood doping in 2012 changes the implications of the scene he appears in.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
*** On the other hand, no one considers ''either'' bisexuality or polygamy as unusual in the first place so make of that what you will.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Removing wick to Did Not Do The Research per rename at TRS.
Changed line(s) 12 (click to see context) from:
*** The point, though, is that neither Kate nor her girlfriend ever explicitly identify themselves as polygamists, and no one considers their behavior unusual. The characters act as if polygamy and bisexuality are inherently intertwined, which [[DidNotDoTheResearch they're not]].
to:
*** The point, though, is that neither Kate nor her girlfriend ever explicitly identify themselves as polygamists, and no one considers their behavior unusual. The characters act as if polygamy and bisexuality are inherently intertwined, which [[DidNotDoTheResearch they're not]].not.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
*** The point, though, is that neither Kate nor her girlfriend ever explicitly identify themselves as polygamists, and no one considers their behavior unusual. The characters act as if polygamy and bisexuality are inherently intertwined, which [[DidNotDoTheResearch they're not]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** It is possible to be bisexual ''and'' polygamist, mind. Bisexuality refers to sexual orientation. Polygamy and monogamy refer to the number of partners in the relationship.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 10 (click to see context) from:
* UnfortunateImplications: The one bisexual in the movie is shown kissing her girlfriend, then kissing Peter. No breakups, nothing. She is assumed to date both her girlfriend and Peter. That is not how bisexuality usually works in today's society.
to:
* UnfortunateImplications: The one bisexual in the movie is shown kissing her girlfriend, then kissing Peter. No breakups, nothing. She is assumed to date both her girlfriend and Peter. That is not how bisexuality usually works in today's society. They have a word for a relationship like that--it's not called "bisexuality", it's called "polygamy".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** One of the dodgeball is future WWE Women's Champion CandiceMichelle.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 11 (click to see context) from:
*** Well, the game ''is'' sponsored by the [[DepartmentOfRedundancyDepartment American Dodgeball Associaton of America]] - therefore RefugeInAudacity kicks in, since it's made fairly clear that they're intentionally playing up those stereotypes. Just look at the German team.
to:
*** Well, the game ''is'' sponsored by the [[DepartmentOfRedundancyDepartment American Dodgeball Associaton Association of America]] - therefore RefugeInAudacity kicks in, since it's made fairly clear that they're intentionally playing up those stereotypes. Just look at the German team.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
*** Well, the game ''is'' sponsored by the [[DepartmentOfRedundancyDepartment American Dodgeball Associaton of America]] - therefore RefugeInAudacity kicks in, since it's made fairly clear that they're intentionally playing up those stereotypes. Just look at the German team.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* EnsembleDarkhorse: Patches and Steve the Pirate.