alt title(s): Natter; Conversation On The Main Page
"On the Internet, you can identify a geek in the throes of an accuracy attack by his signature cry of, 'Um, actually…'. The 'Um' is usually added (and yes, written in) in a feeble attempt to not make it appear that the geek is being condescending when 99% of the time that is exactly what he’s doing. Another phrase you’re likely to hear is, 'you forgot', the point of which is the unstated, 'but I didn’t!'”
Our articles and example lists are not a chatroom, forum, or your blog.
You're in the middle of reading an interesting trope page. But what's this? Something's wrong with one of the examples! Either it's incorrect in some factual particular, or there's something the original writer obviously didn't consider, or perhaps it's just not a good idea to have it on the page at all. So you click the edit button, and write underneath, "Actually, the way it
should be is..."
Wait a minute. If there's a change to be made, you should be making a change. And if there's discussion to be done... shouldn't that go on the discussion page? This is especially bad to do in a "This X has examples of:" list, as it ruins the readability of the list. If not kept in check, this can lead to
entries becoming more like forum threads. And if that's the case, shouldn't you
Take It To The Forums instead?
This kind of thing is also informally referred to as "
Natter". Mind you, this is okay in supplements that are made for it, like
It Just Bugs Me. It's just not okay in our actual articles. Conversation in the main page is often a result of a
Rhetorical Question Blunder.
This applies to jokes too, so be careful what you nominate for
Made Of Win lest it get zapped.
