Follow TV Tropes

Following

History YMMV / DarkUniverse

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* SugarWiki/AwesomeMusic: The announcement trailer for the franchise features a new song written as a {{Leitmotif}} for it by Danny Elfman. It sounds about as darkly epic as you'd expect.

to:

* SugarWiki/AwesomeMusic: The announcement trailer for the franchise features a new song written as a {{Leitmotif}} for it by Danny Elfman.Creator/DannyElfman. It sounds about as darkly epic as you'd expect.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** One movie in, and there are some signs of this already. Namely whether the franchise should be playing it closer to the modern SharedUniverse model to attract those audiences (such as fans of the ''Film/MarvelCinematicUniverse''), or whether it should veer more to the style that defined the original ''Franchise/UniversalHorror'' brand, as well as most of the horror genre. Although ''The Mummy'' seemed to try appealing to both sides, it didn't really hit it off with either. Perhaps because of this, the second movie has been pushed back to allow time to rework the script.

to:

** One movie in, and there are some signs of this already. Namely whether the franchise should be playing it closer to the modern SharedUniverse model to attract those audiences (such as fans of the ''Film/MarvelCinematicUniverse''), or whether it should veer more to the style that defined the original ''Franchise/UniversalHorror'' brand, as well as most of the horror genre. Although ''The Mummy'' seemed to try appealing to both sides, it didn't really hit it off with either. Fans of the classic horror movies were turned off by how the movie spends most of its runtime on Creator/TomCruise's character instead of the titular monster while mainstream audiences weren't won over by the film's connection to rather obscure horror monsters. Perhaps because of this, the second movie has been pushed back to allow time to rework the script.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** It got even worse when it was revealed that Javier Bardem was ''never'' actually officially signed up to play Frankenstein's Monster, and all of Universal's bragging about the whole franchise they were going to create started looking just that more arrogant. The "cast photo" of all the monster actors released prior to ''The Mummy'' is now a big shorthand for studio hubris.

to:

** It got even worse when it was revealed that Javier Bardem was ''never'' actually officially signed up to play Frankenstein's Monster, and all of Universal's bragging about the whole franchise they were going to create started looking just that more arrogant. The (photoshopped) "cast photo" of all the monster Dark Universe actors released prior to ''The Mummy'' is now a big shorthand for studio hubris.

Added: 579

Changed: 577

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* UncertainAudience: One movie in, and there are some signs of this already. Namely whether the franchise should be playing it closer to the modern SharedUniverse model to attract those audiences (such as fans of the ''Film/MarvelCinematicUniverse''), or whether it should veer more to the style that defined the original ''Franchise/UniversalHorror'' brand, as well as most of the horror genre. Although ''The Mummy'' seemed to try appealing to both sides, it didn't really hit it off with either. Perhaps because of this, the second movie has been pushed back to allow time to rework the script.

to:

* UncertainAudience: UncertainAudience:
**
One movie in, and there are some signs of this already. Namely whether the franchise should be playing it closer to the modern SharedUniverse model to attract those audiences (such as fans of the ''Film/MarvelCinematicUniverse''), or whether it should veer more to the style that defined the original ''Franchise/UniversalHorror'' brand, as well as most of the horror genre. Although ''The Mummy'' seemed to try appealing to both sides, it didn't really hit it off with either. Perhaps because of this, the second movie has been pushed back to allow time to rework the script.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* FandomRivalry: Some friction between this universe and the ''Film/MonsterVerse'' after Universal's reaction to the use of King Kong, with a representative even saying "shared monster universes don't work". There is also a distinct rivalry so far with the ''Film/MarvelCinematicUniverse'', with plenty of people in that community finding the ''Dark Universe'' to be a lackluster FollowTheLeader example.

to:

* FandomRivalry: Some friction between this universe and the ''Film/MonsterVerse'' after Universal's reaction to the use of King Kong, with a representative even saying "shared monster universes don't work". There is also a distinct rivalry so far with the ''Film/MarvelCinematicUniverse'', Franchise/MarvelCinematicUniverse, with plenty of people in that community finding the ''Dark Universe'' to be a lackluster FollowTheLeader example.



** The decision to include a ''Dark Universe'' logo in front of ''Film/{{The Mummy|2017}}'' -- before the movie had even established its cinematic universe, or attracted enough interest in said universe to warrant naming an entire brand -- was mocked for putting the cart before the horse. Some audiences for that film reportedly laughed derisively when the logo was unveiled before the movie started, viewing it as a pretty blatant case of FollowTheLeader for the "Cinematic Universe" trend. The fact that the movie was only marginally profitable didn't help matters.

to:

** The decision to include a ''Dark Universe'' logo in front of ''Film/{{The Mummy|2017}}'' -- before the movie had even established its cinematic universe, or attracted enough interest in said universe to warrant naming an entire brand -- was mocked for putting the cart before the horse. Some audiences for that film reportedly laughed derisively when the logo was unveiled before the movie started, viewing it as a pretty blatant case of FollowTheLeader for the "Cinematic Universe" trend. The fact that the movie [[BoxOfficeBomb was only marginally profitable profitable]] didn't help matters.

Added: 946

Changed: 565

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* SnarkBait: The decision to include a ''Dark Universe'' logo in front of ''Film/{{The Mummy|2017}}'' -- before the movie had even established its cinematic universe, or attracted enough interest in said universe to warrant naming an entire brand -- was mocked for putting the cart before the horse. Some audiences for that film reportedly laughed derisively when the logo was unveiled before the movie started, viewing it as a pretty blatant case of FollowTheLeader for the "Cinematic Universe" trend. The fact that the movie was only marginally profitable didn't help matters.

to:

* SnarkBait: SnarkBait:
**
The decision to include a ''Dark Universe'' logo in front of ''Film/{{The Mummy|2017}}'' -- before the movie had even established its cinematic universe, or attracted enough interest in said universe to warrant naming an entire brand -- was mocked for putting the cart before the horse. Some audiences for that film reportedly laughed derisively when the logo was unveiled before the movie started, viewing it as a pretty blatant case of FollowTheLeader for the "Cinematic Universe" trend. The fact that the movie was only marginally profitable didn't help matters.matters.
** It got even worse when it was revealed that Javier Bardem was ''never'' actually officially signed up to play Frankenstein's Monster, and all of Universal's bragging about the whole franchise they were going to create started looking just that more arrogant. The "cast photo" of all the monster actors released prior to ''The Mummy'' is now a big shorthand for studio hubris.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** It gets worse for the project - [[http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/heat-vision/alex-kurtzman-chris-morgan-exit-universal-monsterverse-1055854 The main architects of the Dark Universe have bailed on the project as of November 2017.]] The Dark Universe may be basically rebooted or outright ended before it has a chance to get going. Though considering ''Film/{{The Mummy|2017}}'' is considered by many to be a dreadful film and a poor foundation for a cinematic universe, some aren't exactly considering this a bad thing.

to:

** It gets worse for the project - [[http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/heat-vision/alex-kurtzman-chris-morgan-exit-universal-monsterverse-1055854 The main architects of the Dark Universe have bailed on the project as of November 2017.]] The Dark Universe may be basically rebooted or outright ended before it has a chance to get going. Though considering ''Film/{{The Mummy|2017}}'' is considered by many to be a dreadful film and a poor foundation for a cinematic universe, universe and exits two non-horror names off the properties, some aren't exactly considering this a bad thing.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** It gets worse - [[http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/heat-vision/alex-kurtzman-chris-morgan-exit-universal-monsterverse-1055854 The main architects of the Dark Universe have bailed on the project as of November 2017.]] The Dark Universe may be basically rebooted or outright ended before it has a chance to get going.

to:

** It gets worse for the project - [[http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/heat-vision/alex-kurtzman-chris-morgan-exit-universal-monsterverse-1055854 The main architects of the Dark Universe have bailed on the project as of November 2017.]] The Dark Universe may be basically rebooted or outright ended before it has a chance to get going. Though considering ''Film/{{The Mummy|2017}}'' is considered by many to be a dreadful film and a poor foundation for a cinematic universe, some aren't exactly considering this a bad thing.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** It gets worse - [[http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/heat-vision/alex-kurtzman-chris-morgan-exit-universal-monsterverse-1055854 The main architects of the Dark Universe have bailed on the project as of November 2017.]] The Dark Universe may be basically rebooted or outright ended before it has a chance to get going.

Changed: 380

Removed: 893

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* FandomRivalry / FriendlyFandoms: As of late 2017
** There is some issue between this and the ''Film/MonsterVerse'' after Universal's reaction to the use of King Kong with even a representative saying "shared monster universes don't work". As such creating some animosity with this universe now existing. In general there's plenty of overlap between giant monster fans and classic monster fans so whether this will improve may change or as they stand as horror franchises in a sea of super hero franchises.
** There is also a distinct rivalry so far with the ''Film/MarvelCinematicUniverse'' with plenty of in that community finding even with the above being a lackluster FollowTheLeader example. It's not sure Universal itself realized many of the things that they may want to follow the MCU are things that will tick off the monster/horror fans and vice versa. But only one movie in, it's pretty clear both fandoms have realized this already.

to:

* FandomRivalry / FriendlyFandoms: As of late 2017
** There is some issue
FandomRivalry: Some friction between this universe and the ''Film/MonsterVerse'' after Universal's reaction to the use of King Kong Kong, with even a representative even saying "shared monster universes don't work". As such creating some animosity with this universe now existing. In general there's plenty of overlap between giant monster fans and classic monster fans so whether this will improve may change or as they stand as horror franchises in a sea of super hero franchises.
**
There is also a distinct rivalry so far with the ''Film/MarvelCinematicUniverse'' ''Film/MarvelCinematicUniverse'', with plenty of people in that community finding even with the above being ''Dark Universe'' to be a lackluster FollowTheLeader example. It's not sure Universal itself realized many of the things that they may want to follow the MCU are things that will tick off the monster/horror fans and vice versa. But only one movie in, it's pretty clear both fandoms have realized this already.example.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* SnarkBait: The decision to include a ''Dark Universe'' logo in front of ''Film/{{The Mummy|2017}}'' -- before the movie had even '''established''' its cinematic universe, or attracted enough interest in said universe to warrant naming an entire brand -- was mocked for putting the cart before the horse. Some audiences for that film reportedly laughed derisively when the logo was unveiled before the movie started, viewing it as a pretty blatant case of FollowTheLeader for the "Cinematic Universe" trend. The fact that the movie was only marginally profitable didn't help matters.

to:

* SnarkBait: The decision to include a ''Dark Universe'' logo in front of ''Film/{{The Mummy|2017}}'' -- before the movie had even '''established''' established its cinematic universe, or attracted enough interest in said universe to warrant naming an entire brand -- was mocked for putting the cart before the horse. Some audiences for that film reportedly laughed derisively when the logo was unveiled before the movie started, viewing it as a pretty blatant case of FollowTheLeader for the "Cinematic Universe" trend. The fact that the movie was only marginally profitable didn't help matters.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* UncertainAudience: One movie in, and there are some signs of this already. Namely whether the franchise should be playing it closer to the modern SharedUniverse model to attract those audiences (such as fans of the ''Film/MarvelCinematicUniverse''), or whether it should veer more to the style that defined the original Universal Horror brand, as well as most of the horror genre. Although ''The Mummy'' seemed to try appealing to both sides, it didn't really hit it off with either. Perhaps because of this, the second movie has been pushed back to allow time to rework the script.

to:

* UncertainAudience: One movie in, and there are some signs of this already. Namely whether the franchise should be playing it closer to the modern SharedUniverse model to attract those audiences (such as fans of the ''Film/MarvelCinematicUniverse''), or whether it should veer more to the style that defined the original Universal Horror ''Franchise/UniversalHorror'' brand, as well as most of the horror genre. Although ''The Mummy'' seemed to try appealing to both sides, it didn't really hit it off with either. Perhaps because of this, the second movie has been pushed back to allow time to rework the script.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* UncertainAudience: One movie in, and there are some signs of this already. Namely whether the franchise should be playing it closer to the modern SharedUniverse model to attract in the audiences that are eating up it (like the ''Film/MarvelCinematicUniverse'') or should it veer more to the looser take it as it rolls model that defined the original Universal Horror brand as well as most of the horror genre. The Mummy seemed do some things to appeal to both sides that bothered the other, this trope may be more settled given they pushed back the second movie to rework on the script.

to:

* UncertainAudience: One movie in, and there are some signs of this already. Namely whether the franchise should be playing it closer to the modern SharedUniverse model to attract in the those audiences that are eating up it (like (such as fans of the ''Film/MarvelCinematicUniverse'') ''Film/MarvelCinematicUniverse''), or whether it should it veer more to the looser take it as it rolls model style that defined the original Universal Horror brand brand, as well as most of the horror genre. The Mummy Although ''The Mummy'' seemed do some things to appeal try appealing to both sides that bothered the other, this trope may be more settled given they pushed back sides, it didn't really hit it off with either. Perhaps because of this, the second movie has been pushed back to allow time to rework on the script.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* UncertainAudience: One movie in, and there are some signs of this already. Namely whether the franchise should be playing it closer to the modern SharedUniverse model to attract in the audiences that are eating up it (like the ''Film/MarvelCinematicUniverse'') or should it veer more to the looser take it as it rolls model that defined the original Universal Horror brand as well as most of the horror genre. The Mummy seemed do some things to appeal to both sides that bothered the other, this trope may be more settled given they pushed back the second movie to rework on the script.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* FandomRivalry / FriendlyFandoms: As of late 2017
** There is some issue between this and the ''Film/MonsterVerse'' after Universal's reaction to the use of King Kong with even a representative saying "shared monster universes don't work". As such creating some animosity with this universe now existing. In general there's plenty of overlap between giant monster fans and classic monster fans so whether this will improve may change or as they stand as horror franchises in a sea of super hero franchises.
** There is also a distinct rivalry so far with the ''Film/MarvelCinematicUniverse'' with plenty of in that community finding even with the above being a lackluster FollowTheLeader example. It's not sure Universal itself realized many of the things that they may want to follow the MCU are things that will tick off the monster/horror fans and vice versa. But only one movie in, it's pretty clear both fandoms have realized this already.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* SnarkBait: The decision to include a ''Dark Universe'' logo in front of ''Film/{{The Mummy|2017}}'' -- before the movie had even established its cinematic universe, or attracted enough interest in said universe to warrant naming an entire brand -- was mocked for putting the cart before the horse. Some audiences for that film reportedly laughed derisively when the logo was unveiled before the movie started, viewing it as a pretty blatant case of FollowTheLeader for the "Cinematic Universe" trend. The fact that the movie was only marginally profitable didn't help matters.

to:

* SnarkBait: The decision to include a ''Dark Universe'' logo in front of ''Film/{{The Mummy|2017}}'' -- before the movie had even established '''established''' its cinematic universe, or attracted enough interest in said universe to warrant naming an entire brand -- was mocked for putting the cart before the horse. Some audiences for that film reportedly laughed derisively when the logo was unveiled before the movie started, viewing it as a pretty blatant case of FollowTheLeader for the "Cinematic Universe" trend. The fact that the movie was only marginally profitable didn't help matters.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* SnarkBait: The decision to include a ''Dark Universe'' logo in front of ''The Mummy'' -- before the movie had even established its cinematic universe, or attracted enough interest in said universe to warrant naming an entire brand -- was mocked for putting the cart before the horse. Some audiences for that film reportedly laughed derisively when the logo was unveiled before the movie started, viewing it as a pretty blatant case of FollowTheLeader for the "Cinematic Universe" trend. That the movie was only marginally profitable didn't help matters.

to:

* SnarkBait: The decision to include a ''Dark Universe'' logo in front of ''The Mummy'' ''Film/{{The Mummy|2017}}'' -- before the movie had even established its cinematic universe, or attracted enough interest in said universe to warrant naming an entire brand -- was mocked for putting the cart before the horse. Some audiences for that film reportedly laughed derisively when the logo was unveiled before the movie started, viewing it as a pretty blatant case of FollowTheLeader for the "Cinematic Universe" trend. That The fact that the movie was only marginally profitable didn't help matters.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
I think this is worth having if it's stated more respectfully.

Added DiffLines:

* SnarkBait: The decision to include a ''Dark Universe'' logo in front of ''The Mummy'' -- before the movie had even established its cinematic universe, or attracted enough interest in said universe to warrant naming an entire brand -- was mocked for putting the cart before the horse. Some audiences for that film reportedly laughed derisively when the logo was unveiled before the movie started, viewing it as a pretty blatant case of FollowTheLeader for the "Cinematic Universe" trend. That the movie was only marginally profitable didn't help matters.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Getting rid of a less-than-civil example.


* SnarkBait: The franchise is being thoroughly mocked for first retooling ''Dracula Untold'' late in production to serve as an introduction only to scrap it after mostly lukewarm reception, and then having the second attempt at its first film be just as badly received, [[FromBadToWorse if not more so]] (though with Tom Cruise's help, [[GermansLoveDavidHasselhoff it made big bucks internationally]]). It doesn't help that they had the chutzpah to actually give the franchise its own logo at the start of ''The Mummy'', which has been reported to be met by derisive laughter in several theaters.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* SnarkBait: The franchise is being thoroughly mocked for first retooling ''Dracula Untold'' late in production to serve as an introduction only to scrap it after mostly lukewarm reception, and then having the second attempt at its first film be just as badly received, [[FromBadToWorse if not more so]]. It doesn't help that they had the chutzpah to actually give the franchise its own logo at the start of ''The Mummy'', which has been reported to be met by derisive laughter in several theaters.

to:

* SnarkBait: The franchise is being thoroughly mocked for first retooling ''Dracula Untold'' late in production to serve as an introduction only to scrap it after mostly lukewarm reception, and then having the second attempt at its first film be just as badly received, [[FromBadToWorse if not more so]].so]] (though with Tom Cruise's help, [[GermansLoveDavidHasselhoff it made big bucks internationally]]). It doesn't help that they had the chutzpah to actually give the franchise its own logo at the start of ''The Mummy'', which has been reported to be met by derisive laughter in several theaters.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
not ymmv. moving


* SpiritualSuccessor: To the classic UniversalHorror films, [[UrExample one of the earliest examples]] of a SharedUniverse in cinema. The classic Universal Horror monsters were loosely connected through crossover films. In contrast, this is planned to follow the modern "cinematic universe" model [[TropeCodifier as codified by]] the Franchise/MarvelCinematicUniverse: with tighter continuity, EasterEggs and {{Sequel Hook}}s.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* SnarkBait: The franchise was quite thoroughly mocked for first retooling a movie late in production to serve as an introduction only to scrap it when people hated it, and then having the second attempt at its first film be just as badly received, [[FromBadToWorse if not more so]]. It doesn't help that they had the chutzpah to actually give the franchise its own logo at the start of each film, which has been reported to be met by derisive laughter in several theaters.

to:

* SnarkBait: The franchise was quite is being thoroughly mocked for first retooling a movie ''Dracula Untold'' late in production to serve as an introduction only to scrap it when people hated it, after mostly lukewarm reception, and then having the second attempt at its first film be just as badly received, [[FromBadToWorse if not more so]]. It doesn't help that they had the chutzpah to actually give the franchise its own logo at the start of each film, ''The Mummy'', which has been reported to be met by derisive laughter in several theaters.

Changed: 190

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* SnarkBait: The franchise was quite thoroughly mocked for first retooling a movie late in production to serve as an introduction only to scrap it when people hated it, and then having the second attempt at its first film be just as badly received, [[FromBadToWorse if not more so]].

to:

* SnarkBait: The franchise was quite thoroughly mocked for first retooling a movie late in production to serve as an introduction only to scrap it when people hated it, and then having the second attempt at its first film be just as badly received, [[FromBadToWorse if not more so]]. It doesn't help that they had the chutzpah to actually give the franchise its own logo at the start of each film, which has been reported to be met by derisive laughter in several theaters.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* SnarkBait: The franchise was quite thoroughly mocked for first retooling a movie late in production to serve as an introduction only to scrap it when people hated it, and then having the second attempt at its first film be just as badly received.

to:

* SnarkBait: The franchise was quite thoroughly mocked for first retooling a movie late in production to serve as an introduction only to scrap it when people hated it, and then having the second attempt at its first film be just as badly received.received, [[FromBadToWorse if not more so]].

Added: 8

Changed: 63

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


----



* SnarkBait: The franchise was quite thoroughly mocked for first retooling a movie late in production to serve as an introduction only to scrap it when people hated it, and then having the second attempt at its first film be just as badly received. Even the DC Extended Universe didn't hit that many roadblocks.
* SpiritualSuccessor: To the classic UniversalHorror films, [[UrExample one of the earliest examples]] of a SharedUniverse in cinema. The classic Universal Horror monsters were loosely connected through crossover films. In contrast, this is planned to follow the modern "cinematic universe" model [[TropeCodifier as codified by]] the Franchise/MarvelCinematicUniverse: with tighter continuity, EasterEggs and {{Sequel Hook}}s.

to:

* SnarkBait: The franchise was quite thoroughly mocked for first retooling a movie late in production to serve as an introduction only to scrap it when people hated it, and then having the second attempt at its first film be just as badly received. Even the DC Extended Universe didn't hit that many roadblocks.
received.
* SpiritualSuccessor: To the classic UniversalHorror films, [[UrExample one of the earliest examples]] of a SharedUniverse in cinema. The classic Universal Horror monsters were loosely connected through crossover films. In contrast, this is planned to follow the modern "cinematic universe" model [[TropeCodifier as codified by]] the Franchise/MarvelCinematicUniverse: with tighter continuity, EasterEggs and {{Sequel Hook}}s.Hook}}s.
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
I think Wonder Woman 2017 has proven that it's not quite sunk yet.


* SnarkBait: The franchise was quite thoroughly mocked for first retooling a movie late in production to serve as an introduction only to scrap it when people hated it, and then having the second attempt at its first film be just as badly received. Even the DC Extended Universe didn't sink so quickly.

to:

* SnarkBait: The franchise was quite thoroughly mocked for first retooling a movie late in production to serve as an introduction only to scrap it when people hated it, and then having the second attempt at its first film be just as badly received. Even the DC Extended Universe didn't sink so quickly.hit that many roadblocks.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* SnarkBait: The franchise was quite thoroughly mocked for first retooling a movie late in production to serve as an introduction only to scrap it when people hated it, and then having the second attempt at its first film be just as badly received. Even the DC Extended Universe didn't sink so quickly.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* SpiritualSuccessor: To the classic UniversalHorror films, [[UrExample one of the earliest examples]] of a SharedUniverse in cinema. The classic Universal Horror monsters were loosely connected through crossover films. In contrast, this is planned to follow the modern "cinematic universe" model [[TropeCodifier as codified by]] the Franchise/MarvelCinematicUniverse: with tighter continuity, EasterEggs and SequelHooks.

to:

* SpiritualSuccessor: To the classic UniversalHorror films, [[UrExample one of the earliest examples]] of a SharedUniverse in cinema. The classic Universal Horror monsters were loosely connected through crossover films. In contrast, this is planned to follow the modern "cinematic universe" model [[TropeCodifier as codified by]] the Franchise/MarvelCinematicUniverse: with tighter continuity, EasterEggs and SequelHooks.{{Sequel Hook}}s.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* SugarWiki/AwesomeMusic: The announcement trailer for the franchise features a new song written as a {{Leitmotif}} for it by Danny Elfman. It sounds about as darkly epic as you'd expect.

to:

* SugarWiki/AwesomeMusic: The announcement trailer for the franchise features a new song written as a {{Leitmotif}} for it by Danny Elfman. It sounds about as darkly epic as you'd expect.expect.
* SpiritualSuccessor: To the classic UniversalHorror films, [[UrExample one of the earliest examples]] of a SharedUniverse in cinema. The classic Universal Horror monsters were loosely connected through crossover films. In contrast, this is planned to follow the modern "cinematic universe" model [[TropeCodifier as codified by]] the Franchise/MarvelCinematicUniverse: with tighter continuity, EasterEggs and SequelHooks.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* SugarWiki/AwesomeMusic: The announcement trailer for the franchise features a new song written as a {{Leitmotif}} for it by Danny Elfman. It sounds about as darkly epic as you'd expect.

Top