Follow TV Tropes

Following

History YMMV / DRACULA

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
unfortunate implications need citations


* UnfortunateImplications: Of all the characters they could've [[RaceLift made black]], they went with Renfield. ''Renfield.'' The guy Dracula makes his servant!

to:

* UnfortunateImplications: Of all the characters they could've [[RaceLift made black]], they went with Renfield. ''Renfield.'' The guy Dracula makes his servant!
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Main page trope.


* AllFirstPersonNarratorsWriteLikeNovelists: Pretty blatant example. The novel is presented as a collection of diaries, telegrams and newspaper clippings, the diaries being kept by characters like Jonathan (a lawyer), Mina (a lady of society), Seward (a psychiatrist), etc. Not only do all of them write in very much the same style, but all of them make use of [[SesquipedalianLoquaciousness florid, poetic language]], despite none of them being professional writers. They also include long pages of dialogue that any real journal keeper would simply summarize.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Natter


** According to several feminist and post-colonialist critics, ''this'' was indeed the appeal and subtext of the story. The appeal of vampires as the foreign "other" out to seduce innocent Victorian women, and so needing men to be ever vigilant to protect women from ''their'' desires or weaknesses. This attitude is best conveyed in [[http://www.harkavagrant.com/index.php?id=285 this comic]] by [[Webcomic/HarkAVagrant Kate Beaton]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* UnfortunateImplications: Of all the characters they could've [[RaceLift made black]], they went with Renfield. ''Renfield.'' The guy Dracula makes his servant!

Changed: 117

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Nearly every adaptation turns Lucy into a sexually promiscuous and flirty girl. In the novel she's a downright PuritySue but this gets turned into her lusting after all her potential suitors. It's shown as a huge character flaw that her sole ambition is to marry before she turns 20. An upper class Victorian woman wouldn't be expected to have more ambition than that. The novel makes a point that Lucy cares and possibly loves all her potential suitors - but that normally gets lost in adaptations that portray her as a shameless flirt. It seems an attempt at DeathBySex though one must realise that Lucy died before her wedding, therefore as a virgin while Mina married Jonathan and was presumably ''not'' a virgin by the book's end. Kate Beaton, author of the Web comic cited this incident, noting:

to:

** Nearly every adaptation turns Lucy into a sexually promiscuous and flirty girl. girl, with the odd exception of 2013 television series ([[AdaptationalSexuality which turns her into a lesbian instead]].) In the novel she's a downright PuritySue but this gets turned into her lusting after all her potential suitors. It's shown as a huge character flaw that her sole ambition is to marry before she turns 20. An upper class Victorian woman wouldn't be expected to have more ambition than that. The novel makes a point that Lucy cares and possibly loves all her potential suitors - but that normally gets lost in adaptations that portray her as a shameless flirt. It seems an attempt at DeathBySex though one must realise that Lucy died before her wedding, therefore as a virgin while Mina married Jonathan and was presumably ''not'' a virgin by the book's end. Kate Beaton, author of the Web comic cited this incident, noting:

Added: 662

Changed: 343

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Also as noted under ValuesDissonance, it has an inversion of the DeathBySex trope before it ever became a trope. Lucy becomes a vampire before her wedding, therefore dying a virgin. Mina however marries Jonathan in the course of the story - so is likely not a virgin by the end. Dracula even attacks them while they're in bed together. It's usually lost in adaptations that portray Lucy as the slutty one and Mina as the ShrinkingViolet.



* HoYay: Mina sure likes describing how pretty Lucy is...

to:

* HoYay: Mina sure likes describing how pretty Lucy is...is. They even share a kiss in the Francis Ford Coppola film. The TV series outright makes Lucy a lesbian.



* PuritySue: Debatable but Lucy.

to:

* PuritySue: Debatable but Lucy. It's probably semi justified since most descriptions of her are coming from Mina's journal entries - and Mina does admire her. And since she's already dead by the time the story is written, it's probably a case of them fondly remembering her.


Added DiffLines:

** Though it is stated that Mrs Westenra died of heart failure when the wolf crashed through the window to attack Lucy. Presumably she would have been dead by the time Lucy was a vampire, making it impossible to turn her.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* AllFirstPersonNarratorsWriteLikeNovelists: Pretty blatant example. The novel is presented as a collection of diaries, telegrams and newspaper clippings, the diaries being kept by characters like Jonathan (a lawyer), Mina (a lady of society), Seward (a psychiatrist), etc. Not only do all of them write in very much the same style, but all of them make use of [[SesquipedalianLoquaciousness florid, poetic language]], despite none of them being professional writers. They also include long pages of dialogue that any real journal keeper would simply summarize.

Added: 304

Changed: 67

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** According to several feminist and post-colonialist critics, ''this'' was indeed the appeal and subtext of the story. The appeal of vampires as the foreign "other" out to seduce innocent Victorian women, and so needing men to be ever vigilant to protect women from ''their'' desires or weaknesses. This attitude is best conveyed in [[http://www.harkavagrant.com/index.php?id=285 this comic]] by [[Webcomic/HarkAVagrant Kate Beaton]].

to:

** According to several feminist and post-colonialist critics, ''this'' was indeed the appeal and subtext of the story. The appeal of vampires as the foreign "other" out to seduce innocent Victorian women, and so needing men to be ever vigilant to protect women from ''their'' desires or weaknesses. This attitude is best conveyed in [[http://www.harkavagrant.com/index.php?id=285 this comic]] by [[Webcomic/HarkAVagrant Kate Beaton]].



** Nearly every adaptation turns Lucy into a sexually promiscuous and flirty girl. In the novel she's a downright PuritySue but this gets turned into her lusting after all her potential suitors. It's shown as a huge character flaw that her sole ambition is to marry before she turns 20. An upper class Victorian woman wouldn't be expected to have more ambition than that. The novel makes a point that Lucy cares and possibly loves all her potential suitors - but that normally gets lost in adaptations that portray her as a shameless flirt. It seems an attempt at DeathBySex though one must realise that Lucy died before her wedding, therefore as a virgin while Mina married Jonathan and was presumably ''not'' a virgin by the book's end.

to:

** Nearly every adaptation turns Lucy into a sexually promiscuous and flirty girl. In the novel she's a downright PuritySue but this gets turned into her lusting after all her potential suitors. It's shown as a huge character flaw that her sole ambition is to marry before she turns 20. An upper class Victorian woman wouldn't be expected to have more ambition than that. The novel makes a point that Lucy cares and possibly loves all her potential suitors - but that normally gets lost in adaptations that portray her as a shameless flirt. It seems an attempt at DeathBySex though one must realise that Lucy died before her wedding, therefore as a virgin while Mina married Jonathan and was presumably ''not'' a virgin by the book's end. Kate Beaton, author of the Web comic cited this incident, noting:
--> ''Here we have Bram Stoker's Dracula, a book written to tell ladies that if you're not a submissive waif, society goes to hell and ungodly monsters are going to turn you into child killing horrors and someone is going to drive a bowie knife through your heart/cut off your head/etc. As you deserve!''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* FairForItsDay: Mina is actually quite a feminist character. Throughout the novel, the men behave foolishly, while Mina is the only one to be consistently intelligent throughout.

to:

* FairForItsDay: Mina is actually quite a feminist character. Throughout the novel, the men behave foolishly, while Mina is the only one to be consistently intelligent throughout. Some later adaptations, especially Creator/AlanMoore's comic ''ComicBook/TheLeagueOfExtraordinaryGentlemen'' and Coppola's ''Film/BramStokersDracula'' center on Mina as the main character of the book and tend to dismiss the other male characters(save for the Count) to better emphasize the feminist subtext.

Added: 180

Changed: 112

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* FairForItsDay: Mina is actually quite a feminist character. Throughout the novel, the men behave foolishly, while Mina is the only one to be consistently intelligent throughout.



* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodCharacter: Some readers often wondered why Dracula never brought his brides with him to London. Wouldn't that have given the heroes more of a challenge. Likewise him never biting Lucy's mother and changing her into a vampire as well.

to:

* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodCharacter: Some readers often wondered why Dracula never brought his brides with him to London. Wouldn't that have given the heroes more of a challenge. Likewise him never biting Lucy's mother and changing her into a vampire as well. The Brides get their roles expanded in the film ''Film/VanHelsing'' and are an EnsembleDarkhorse for many fans.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** According to several feminist and post-colonialist critics, ''this'' was indeed the appeal and subtext of the story. The appeal of vampires as the foreign "other" out to seduce innocent Victorian women, and so needing men to be ever vigilant to protect women from ''their'' desires or weaknesses. This attitude is best conveyed in [[http://www.harkavagrant.com/index.php?id=285 this comic]] by [[Webcomic/HarkAVagrant Kate Beaton]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
The Count is actually innocent to Renfield\'s condition, only exploiting it to his own gain in the original novel. Renfield simply happens to suffer of a form of madness that is susceptible to Dracula\'s influence.


* CompleteMonster: Dracula himself keeps Jonathan Harker in his castle, trying to [[DrivenToMadness drive him mad in the process]], turns Renfield insane, ''kidnaps a baby to feed to the other vampires'' and then sends the wolves to kill the baby's mother, drains Lucy of her blood, attacks her and her mother as a wolf, resulting in Lucy herself as a vampire, and turns Mina into a vampire in order to know what the gang is doing to get him. He is accorded no sympathy, and portrayed as the undead abomination that he is.

to:

* CompleteMonster: Dracula himself keeps Jonathan Harker in his castle, trying to [[DrivenToMadness drive him mad in the process]], turns Renfield insane, ''kidnaps a baby to feed to the other vampires'' and then sends the wolves to kill the baby's mother, drains Lucy of her blood, attacks her and her mother as a wolf, resulting in Lucy herself as a vampire, and turns Mina into a vampire in order to know what the gang is doing to get him. He is accorded no sympathy, and portrayed as the undead abomination that he is.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodCharacter: Some readers often wondered why Dracula never brought his brides with him to London. Wouldn't that have given the heroes more of a challenge. Likewise him never biting Lucy's mother and changing her into a vampire as well.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** taken UpToEleven in the BBC version (the most faithful adaptation of the novel yet made, despite the following change) where she's Lucy's sister.

to:

** taken *** Taken UpToEleven in the BBC version (the most faithful adaptation of the novel yet made, despite the following change) where she's Lucy's sister.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
This isn\'t YMMV. Moving.


* GreyAndGrayMorality: Neither side has clean hands. Even Van Helsing is morally questionable, having [[spoiler:been responsible for bringing Dracula back to life in the first place by killing his tomb-raiding partner and letting his blood drip down on the dead vampire's dessicated face]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Sadly, this element takes a ''critical'' hit in most movie adaptions. most notably, in the Bela Lugosi version, she's portrayed as nothing more than a wimpering child in an adult body. This aspect is returned though in Creator/FrancisFordCoppola's ''Film/BramStokersDracula'' which portrays a romantic attraction between Mina and the Count.

to:

*** Sadly, this element takes a ''critical'' hit in most movie adaptions. most notably, in the Bela Lugosi version, she's portrayed as nothing more than a wimpering whimpering child in an adult body. This aspect is returned though in Creator/FrancisFordCoppola's ''Film/BramStokersDracula'' which portrays a romantic attraction between Mina and the Count.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* RootingForTheEmpire: Some folks actually wouldn't have minded seeing ''Literature/{{Dracula}}'' actually beat the main characters. The book goes out of it way to make vampirism seem like the worst thing in the world. But outside from never seeing the sun again (well the book never really stated that. Drac actually moved around in the daylight, only with limited powers) and the inhuman hunger for blood, receiving the powers of the night and immortality didn't seem like a bad trade-off. Well, at least for themselves; other people ''might'' not be so happy with the "being drained of blood" thing.

to:

* RootingForTheEmpire: Some folks actually wouldn't have minded seeing ''Literature/{{Dracula}}'' actually beat the main characters. The book goes out of it its way to make vampirism seem like the worst thing in the world. But outside from never seeing the sun again (well the book never really stated that. Drac actually moved around in the daylight, only with limited powers) and the inhuman hunger for blood, receiving the powers of the night and immortality didn't seem like a bad trade-off. Well, at least for themselves; other people ''might'' not be so happy with the "being drained of blood" thing.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CriticalResearchFailure: Historical accuracy obviously isn't what this series is interested in, but oil wasn't discovered in the Middle East until 1908, twelve years after the events of the series. Grayson acts as though its existence in the Ottoman territories is common knowledge.

to:

* CriticalResearchFailure: Historical accuracy obviously isn't what this series is interested in, but oil wasn't discovered in the Middle East until 1908, twelve years after the events of the series. Grayson acts as though its existence in the Ottoman territories is common knowledge.knowledge, but knowing about massive deposits of oil in the Ottoman Empire during the 1880s/90s would have ''radically'' altered the politics of the era.

Added: 176

Changed: 156

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Van Helsing doesn't get it as bad as Jonathan Harker who is regarded as a boring and uninteresting AudienceSurrogate with the interesting characters being Dracula and Mina.



*** Sadly, this element takes a ''critical'' hit in most movie adaptions. most notably, in the Bela Lugosi version, she's portrayed as nothing more than a wimpering child in an adult body.

to:

*** Sadly, this element takes a ''critical'' hit in most movie adaptions. most notably, in the Bela Lugosi version, she's portrayed as nothing more than a wimpering child in an adult body. This aspect is returned though in Creator/FrancisFordCoppola's ''Film/BramStokersDracula'' which portrays a romantic attraction between Mina and the Count.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


!!The 1931 film:
* DracoInLeatherPants: More so than the original novel.
* HilariousInHindsight: The actors who play Dracula and Van Helsing are named (respectively) [[Literature/{{Twilight}} Bela and Edward]].
* MoralEventHorizon: Dracula crosses this when kills Renfield.
* {{Narm}}: It's atmospheric, the villain is great... but man, most of it hasn't aged well and it's unintentionally hilarious.
** For decades, the sounds of Renfield screaming while being strangled and Dracula's dying moans were censored out, so for most of the film's existence, we just get a short "Huullchk!" when Dracula is staked.
* NightmareRetardant: Armadillos in Dracula's castle? Shiver!
* SpecialEffectFailure: It's blatantly obvious that the bats seen in the film are just rubber puppets on fishing lines. This contrasts with some of the film's other effects, like the glass matte shots which are quite convincing.
* SignatureScene: It's either Dracula welcoming Renfield to his castle, or the brides walking through the catacombs.
* UncannyValley: An odd auditory version. Bela Lugosi spoke very poor English, and learned his lines phonetically. This naturally resulted in Dracula sounding perhaps like he isn't quite used to speaking at all.
** This is actually something that's been debated. For many of Lugosi's early American stage roles he did learn this way, but by the time Dracula was made he was probably a good enough English speaker to speak fluently. Compare Lugosi's speaking to Dracula, which he had played on stage previously, to Murders in the Rue Morgue a couple of years later and you can hear a more natural-sounding if still accented English.

Changed: 512

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CompleteMonster: Dracula himself, who has no sympathetic traits, preys on women, feeds a baby to the wolves, and kills Renfield once he has [[YouHaveOutlivedYourUsefulness outlived his usefulness]].

to:

* CompleteMonster: Dracula himself, who has no sympathetic traits, preys on women, feeds himself keeps Jonathan Harker in his castle, trying to [[DrivenToMadness drive him mad in the process]], turns Renfield insane, ''kidnaps a baby to feed to the wolves, other vampires'' and kills Renfield once then sends the wolves to kill the baby's mother, drains Lucy of her blood, attacks her and her mother as a wolf, resulting in Lucy herself as a vampire, and turns Mina into a vampire in order to know what the gang is doing to get him. He is accorded no sympathy, and portrayed as the undead abomination that he has [[YouHaveOutlivedYourUsefulness outlived his usefulness]].is.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Moved to the main page since it has been shown on-screen


* LesYay: Interviews with a cast have already more-or-less confirmed that Lucy has a crush on Mina.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

**She also notices Dracula in London because they were both admiring the same pretty girl.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* RonTheDeatheater: Van Helsing tends to be portrayed as this in re-tellings from Dracula's point of view, where he's seen as radical and clueless; he particularly gets flak for the transfusions that, admittedly, ''could'' have killed Lucy in real life - leading to said re-tellings claiming that Dracula turned Lucy in order to 'save' her life - but at the time the book was written, neither he nor the author would have known that.

to:

* RonTheDeatheater: Van Helsing tends to be portrayed as this in re-tellings from Dracula's point of view, where he's seen as radical and clueless; he particularly gets flak for the transfusions that, admittedly, ''could'' have killed Lucy in real life - leading to said re-tellings claiming that Dracula turned Lucy in order to 'save' her life - but at the time the book was written, set/written, neither he nor the author would have known that.



*** Sadly, this elemant takes a ''critical'' hit in most movie adaptions. most notably, in the Bela Lugosi version, she's portrayed as nothing more than a wimpering child in an adult body.

to:

*** Sadly, this elemant element takes a ''critical'' hit in most movie adaptions. most notably, in the Bela Lugosi version, she's portrayed as nothing more than a wimpering child in an adult body.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* RootingTheEmpire: Some folks actually wouldn't have minded seeing ''Literature/{{Dracula}}'' actually beat the main characters. The book goes out of it way to make vampirism seem like the worst thing in the world. But outside from never seeing the sun again (well the book never really stated that. Drac actually moved around in the daylight, only with limited powers) and the inhuman hunger for blood, receiving the powers of the night and immortality didn't seem like a bad trade-off. Well, at least for themselves; other people ''might'' not be so happy with the "being drained of blood" thing.

to:

* RootingTheEmpire: RootingForTheEmpire: Some folks actually wouldn't have minded seeing ''Literature/{{Dracula}}'' actually beat the main characters. The book goes out of it way to make vampirism seem like the worst thing in the world. But outside from never seeing the sun again (well the book never really stated that. Drac actually moved around in the daylight, only with limited powers) and the inhuman hunger for blood, receiving the powers of the night and immortality didn't seem like a bad trade-off. Well, at least for themselves; other people ''might'' not be so happy with the "being drained of blood" thing.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* RootingTheEmpire: Some folks actually wouldn't have minded seeing ''Literature/{{Dracula}}'' actually beat the main characters. The book goes out of it way to make vampirism seem like the worst thing in the world. But outside from never seeing the sun again (well the book never really stated that. Drac actually moved around in the daylight, only with limited powers) and the inhuman hunger for blood, receiving the powers of the night and immortality didn't seem like a bad trade-off. Well, at least for themselves; other people ''might'' not be so happy with the "being drained of blood" thing.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Nearly every adaptation turns Lucy into a sexually promiscuous and flirty girl. In the novel she's a downright PuritySue but this gets turned into her lusting after all her potential suitors. It's shown as a huge character flaw that her sole ambition is to marry before she turns 20. An upper class Victorian woman wouldn't be expected to have more ambition than that. The novel makes a point that Lucy cares and possibly loves all her potential suitors - but that normally gets lost in adaptations that portray her as a shameless flirt. It seems an attempt at DeathBySex though one must realise that Lucy died before her wedding, therefore as a virgin while Mina married Jonathan and was presumably ''not'' a virgin by the book's end.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* CriticalResearchFailure: Historical accuracy obviously isn't what this series is interested in, but oil wasn't discovered in the Middle East until 1908, twelve years after the events of the series. Grayson acts as though its existence in the Ottoman territories is common knowledge.

Added: 290

Changed: 1

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* EnsembleDarkhorse: Renfield and Lucy emerged almost instantly as the fandom favourites.

to:

* EnsembleDarkhorse: Renfield and Lucy emerged almost instantly as the fandom favourites. favourites.
* GreyAndGrayMorality: Neither side has clean hands. Even Van Helsing is morally questionable, having [[spoiler:been responsible for bringing Dracula back to life in the first place by killing his tomb-raiding partner and letting his blood drip down on the dead vampire's dessicated face]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* EnsembleDarkhorse: Renfield and Lucy emerged almost instantly as the fandom favourites.

Top