Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3,4 (click to see context) from:
* AudienceAlienatingPremise: A story about two unlikable characters being unlikable to each other because their weddings are on the same day. Who is this meant to appeal to exactly?
* DarknessInducedAudienceApathy / EightDeadlyWords: A big reason why the movie was panned is because of how unlikable and petty the two lead characters are and how the story is just about them both being vindictive to one another all because they're both getting married on the same day, which itself is an incredibly dumb reason for somebody to turn against another.
* DarknessInducedAudienceApathy / EightDeadlyWords: A big reason why the movie was panned is because of how unlikable and petty the two lead characters are and how the story is just about them both being vindictive to one another all because they're both getting married on the same day, which itself is an incredibly dumb reason for somebody to turn against another.
to:
* AudienceAlienatingPremise: A story about two unlikable characters being unlikable to each other because their weddings are were booked on the same day. Who is this meant to appeal to exactly?
* DarknessInducedAudienceApathy / EightDeadlyWords: A big reason why the movie was panned is because of how unlikable and petty the two lead characters are and how the story is just about them both being vindictive to one another all becausethey're both getting married of their weddings were booked on the same day, which itself is an incredibly dumb ridiculous reason for somebody to turn against another.
* DarknessInducedAudienceApathy / EightDeadlyWords: A big reason why the movie was panned is because of how unlikable and petty the two lead characters are and how the story is just about them both being vindictive to one another all because
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added line(s) 4 (click to see context) :
* AudienceAlienatingPremise: A story about two unlikable characters being unlikable to each other because their weddings are on the same day. Who is this meant to appeal to exactly?
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
* DesignatedHero: The two leads are incredibly, terribly unlikeable and treat each other like shit. Yet they're both treated as the heroes.
to:
* DesignatedHero: The two leads are incredibly, terribly unlikeable unlikable and treat each other like shit. Yet they're both treated as the heroes.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
* DarknessInducedAudienceApathy / EightDeadlyWords: A big reason why the movie was panned is because of how unlikable and petty the two lead characters, and how the story is just about them both being vindictive to one another all because they're both getting married on the same day, which itself is an incredibly dumb reason for somebody to turn against another.
to:
* DarknessInducedAudienceApathy / EightDeadlyWords: A big reason why the movie was panned is because of how unlikable and petty the two lead characters, characters are and how the story is just about them both being vindictive to one another all because they're both getting married on the same day, which itself is an incredibly dumb reason for somebody to turn against another.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* DarknessInducedAudienceApathy / EightDeadlyWords: A big reason why the movie was panned is because of how unlikable and petty the two lead characters, and how the story is just about them both being vindictive to one another all because they're both getting married on the same day, which itself is an incredibly dumb reason for somebody to turn against another.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** The childhood opening shows Liv and Emma dressed as the bride and the groom in renacting a wedding.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
* UnintentionallySympathetic: Fletcher. He's the only sane man in this universe and calls out Emma and Liv on their obnoxious behavior. However the audience is supposed to dislike him and see him as controlling because he has the nerve to tell Emma what she is doing is wrong. Unlike Liv's fiancé, Daniel, who just smiles and agrees with everything she does. [[spoiler: In the end, Fletcher's sin of being assertive gets him dumped in favor of Liv's brother Nate.]]
Deleted line(s) 9,10 (click to see context) :
* UnintentionallySympathetic: Fletcher. He's the only sane man in this universe and calls out Emma and Liv on their obnoxious behavior. However the audience is supposed to dislike him and see him as controlling because he has the nerve to tell Emma what she is doing is wrong. Unlike Liv's fiancé, Daniel, who just smiles and agrees with everything she does. [[spoiler: In the end, Fletcher's sin of being assertive gets him dumped in favor of Liv's brother Nate.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
* DesignatedHero: The two leads are incredibly, terribly unlikeable and treat each other like shit.
to:
* DesignatedHero: The two leads are incredibly, terribly unlikeable and treat each other like shit. Yet they're both treated as the heroes.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 9,10 (click to see context) from:
* UnintentionallySympathetic: Fletcher. He's the only sane man in this universe and calls out Emma and Liv on their obnoxious behavior. However the audience is supposed to dislike him and see him as controlling because he has the nerve to tell Emma what she is doing is wrong. Unlike Liv's fiancé, Daniel, who just smiles and agrees with everything she does.
to:
* UnintentionallySympathetic: Fletcher. He's the only sane man in this universe and calls out Emma and Liv on their obnoxious behavior. However the audience is supposed to dislike him and see him as controlling because he has the nerve to tell Emma what she is doing is wrong. Unlike Liv's fiancé, Daniel, who just smiles and agrees with everything she does. \n [[spoiler: In the end, Fletcher's sin of being assertive gets him dumped in favor of Liv's brother Nate.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
* DesignatedHero: The two leads.
to:
* DesignatedHero: The two leads.leads are incredibly, terribly unlikeable and treat each other like shit.
Changed line(s) 8,9 (click to see context) from:
* UnintentionallySympathetic: Fletcher. He's the only sane man in this universe and calls out Emma and Liv on their obnoxious behavior. However we are supposed to dislike him because he has the nerve to tell Emma what she is doing is wrong. Unlike Liv's fiancé, Daniel, who just smiles and agrees with everything she does.
to:
* UnintentionallyUnsympathetic: Liv is a whiny ControlFreak, Emma goes from a doormat to an asshole... the audience is supposed to sympathize with them, WHY?
* UnintentionallySympathetic: Fletcher. He's the only sane man in this universe and calls out Emma and Liv on their obnoxious behavior. Howeverwe are the audience is supposed to dislike him and see him as controlling because he has the nerve to tell Emma what she is doing is wrong. Unlike Liv's fiancé, Daniel, who just smiles and agrees with everything she does.
* UnintentionallySympathetic: Fletcher. He's the only sane man in this universe and calls out Emma and Liv on their obnoxious behavior. However
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* RetroactiveRecognition: [[{{Film/GuardiansOfTheGalaxy}} Star Lord]] is Fletcher.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
--> '''From the trailer''': "Of course every wedding has a story, but the one I'm thinking about isn't about a bride and a groom. It's about a bride and a ''bride''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
unfortunate implications need citations
Deleted line(s) 6 (click to see context) :
* UnfortunateImplications: Women will thoughtlessly throw away lifelong friendships if they get in the way of the perfect wedding and will only come to their senses if their behavior leads to disaster or extreme embarrassment.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Just tweaking the page a little.
Changed line(s) 7,8 (click to see context) from:
* UnintentionallySympathetic: Fletcher. He's the only sane man in this universe and calls out Emma and Liv on their obnoxious behavior. However we are supposed to dislike him because he has the nerve to tell Emma what she is doing is wrong. Unlike Liv's fiancé, old what's-his-face, who just smiles and agrees with everything she does.
to:
* UnintentionallySympathetic: Fletcher. He's the only sane man in this universe and calls out Emma and Liv on their obnoxious behavior. However we are supposed to dislike him because he has the nerve to tell Emma what she is doing is wrong. Unlike Liv's fiancé, old what's-his-face, Daniel, who just smiles and agrees with everything she does.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 7,8 (click to see context) from:
* UnintentionallySympathetic: Fletcher. He's the only sane man in this universe and calls out Emma and Liv on their obnoxious behavior. However we are supposed to dislike him because he has the nerve to tell Emma what she is doing is wrong. Unlike Liv's fiance old whats-his-face who just smiles and agrees with everything she does.
to:
* UnintentionallySympathetic: Fletcher. He's the only sane man in this universe and calls out Emma and Liv on their obnoxious behavior. However we are supposed to dislike him because he has the nerve to tell Emma what she is doing is wrong. Unlike Liv's fiance fiancé, old whats-his-face what's-his-face, who just smiles and agrees with everything she does.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
* IdiotPlot: Wouldn't getting married at the same time be a ''good'' thing in the whole fairy tale narrative these two want for their weddings? Plus, one of them being a lawyer should mean this company would be getting the crap sued out of it.
to:
* IdiotPlot: Wouldn't getting married at the same time be a ''good'' thing in the whole fairy tale narrative these two want for their weddings? Plus, one of them being a lawyer should mean this company would be getting the crap sued out of it.it for the accidental double booking.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
* IdiotPlot: Wouldn't getting married at the same time be a ''good'' thing in the whole fairy tale narrative these two want for their weddings?
to:
* IdiotPlot: Wouldn't getting married at the same time be a ''good'' thing in the whole fairy tale narrative these two want for their weddings?weddings? Plus, one of them being a lawyer should mean this company would be getting the crap sued out of it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* IdiotPlot: Wouldn't getting married at the same time be a ''good'' thing in the whole fairy tale narrative these two want for their weddings?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Deleted line(s) 4 (click to see context) :
* IdiotPlot: All of the conflict could have been avoided if the two leads just agreed to do a double wedding to begin with. After all, wouldn't that be a ''good'' thing if they're trying to do something out of a fairy tale?
Deleted line(s) 6 (click to see context) :
* MoralEventHorizon: A mild example. The two women do such terrible things to one another on a vitally important day that it's difficult for either of them to maintain the audience's sympathy.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
* IdiotPlot: All of the conflict could have been avoided if the two leads just agreed to do a double wedding to begin with.
to:
* IdiotPlot: All of the conflict could have been avoided if the two leads just agreed to do a double wedding to begin with. After all, wouldn't that be a ''good'' thing if they're trying to do something out of a fairy tale?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
* IdiotPlot: All of the conflict could have been avoided if they just agreed to do a double wedding to begin with.
to:
* IdiotPlot: All of the conflict could have been avoided if they the two leads just agreed to do a double wedding to begin with.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
* DesignatedHero: The two leads.
to:
* DesignatedHero: The two leads. leads.
* IdiotPlot: All of the conflict could have been avoided if they just agreed to do a double wedding to begin with.
* IdiotPlot: All of the conflict could have been avoided if they just agreed to do a double wedding to begin with.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
* [[HoYay Les Yay]]: Between the two leads
to:
* [[HoYay Les Yay]]: Between the two leadsleads, to the extent that they look more like they should be marrying each other instead of their respective generic men.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
This isn\'t YMMV. Moving.
Deleted line(s) 6,7 (click to see context) :
* SatelliteLoveInterest: The two male grooms are barely noticeable throughout the film and are more plot vehicles than characters. At no point do they issue a strong word to their future wives to stop acting like maniacs.
** Fletcher does call Emma out on her behavior at one point, and [[spoiler: gets dumped for his trouble.]]
** Fletcher does call Emma out on her behavior at one point, and [[spoiler: gets dumped for his trouble.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Rename.
Changed line(s) 6 (click to see context) from:
* ShallowLoveInterest: The two male grooms are barely noticeable throughout the film and are more plot vehicles than characters. At no point do they issue a strong word to their future wives to stop acting like maniacs.
to:
* ShallowLoveInterest: SatelliteLoveInterest: The two male grooms are barely noticeable throughout the film and are more plot vehicles than characters. At no point do they issue a strong word to their future wives to stop acting like maniacs.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 6 (click to see context) from:
* ShallowLoveInterest: The two male grooms are barely noticeable throughout the film and are more plot vehicles than characters. At no point do they issue a strong word to their future wives to stop acting like maniacs.
to:
* ShallowLoveInterest: The two male grooms are barely noticeable throughout the film and are more plot vehicles than characters. At no point do they issue a strong word to their future wives to stop acting like maniacs. maniacs.
** Fletcher does call Emma out on her behavior at one point, and [[spoiler: gets dumped for his trouble.]]
** Fletcher does call Emma out on her behavior at one point, and [[spoiler: gets dumped for his trouble.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* [[HoYay Les Yay]]: Between the two leads
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* MoralEventHorizon: A mild example. The two women do such terrible things to one another on a vitally important day that it's difficult for either of them to maintain the audience's sympathy.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* ShallowLoveInterest: The two male grooms are barely noticable throughout the film and are more plot vehicles than characters. At no point do they issue a strong word to their future wives to stop acting like maniacs.
to:
* DesignatedHero: The two leads.
* ShallowLoveInterest: The two male grooms are barelynoticable noticeable throughout the film and are more plot vehicles than characters. At no point do they issue a strong word to their future wives to stop acting like maniacs.
* ShallowLoveInterest: The two male grooms are barely
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
to:
* UnintentionallySympathetic: Fletcher. He's the only sane man in this universe and calls out Emma and Liv on their obnoxious behavior. However we are supposed to dislike him because he has the nerve to tell Emma what she is doing is wrong. Unlike Liv's fiance old whats-his-face who just smiles and agrees with everything she does.