Follow TV Tropes

Following

History YMMV / BenandArthur

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** The film unambiguously presents organized religion as the absolute enemy of LBGT rights: after making the Sam Mraovich converted to the Church of Latter Day Saints.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ParanoiaFuel: It's kinda impossible to not be paranoid with so many psychotically homophobic fucks.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Trivia, not YMMV


* DawsonCasting: Inverted and lampshaded; the guy playing the private investigator looks way too young, which Victor calls him out on. It turns out that he's an ''intern.''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None




Added DiffLines:

* UnintentionallyUnsympathetic: It's hard to know whether we're supposed to sympathise with Ben or Arthur over the aforementioned punching incident, but neither of them comes out of it looking good. While Ben was clearly at fault for resorting to violence and then blaming it on Arthur, Arthur himself had reacted to Ben's somewhat justified rebuke for failing to lock up their bike (which Ben nonetheless apologized for straight away) with a completely unfair accusation that Ben is ashamed of his sexual orientation and wouldn't give two shits if Arthur died. The end result is that Ben appears sorely in need of anger management classes, while Arthur comes across as an emotionally immature DramaQueen.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** At one point, Ben punches Arthur so hard that he's knocked unconscious and gets a nosebleed. His justification is that he deserved it for "saying stupid things". [[DomesticAbuse What a great lesson for viewers]] [[SarcasmMode Amirite?]]

to:

** At one point, Ben punches Arthur so hard that he's knocked unconscious and gets a nosebleed. His justification is that he deserved it for "saying stupid things". [[DomesticAbuse What a great lesson for viewers]] [[SarcasmMode Amirite?]] amirite?]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** At one point, Ben punches Arthur so hard that he's knocked unconscious and gets a nosebleed. His justification is that he deserved it for "saying stupid things". [[DomesticAbuse What a great lesson for viewers]] [[SarcasmMode Amirite?]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Both films have terrible leading actor-writer-directors, who are fond of showing off their bodies much more so than most audience members are fond of seeing them.

to:

** Both films have terrible leading actor-writer-directors, who are fond of showing off their bodies much more so than most audience members are fond of seeing them. Unlike Tommy Wiseau, Sam Mraovich is credited in nearly ''every'' aspect of production, including editing, cinematography, and even the musical score.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** In Arthur's bizarrely hypothetical speech about him being drafted and dying for a nation that won't allow him to be married doesn't make any sense, since at the time of the film's release, gay men were not allowed to serve openly in the US military under Don't Ask, Don't Tell. Why exactly they felt the need to make something up, when the reality- the US Military will discriminate based on your sexual orientation- is actually much, much worse is a mystery.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Not to mention that at the climax we're supposed to be angry at Victor for shooting Arthur while the latter tries to [[spoiler:''rape him'']].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CriticalResearchFailure: With the option to marry Arthur in Hawaii now gone, Ben mentions to Tammy that he and Arthur can marry in Vermont instead, as a means to dismiss Tammy's claim that "men can't get married in the United States". Vermont allowed same-sex civil unions in 2000, while the film was released in 2002; as [[WebVideo/ObscurusLupa Obscurus Lupa]] noted, same-sex marriage was not possible in Vermont until 2009.

to:

* CriticalResearchFailure: With the option to marry Arthur in Hawaii now gone, Ben mentions to Tammy that he and Arthur can marry in Vermont instead, as a means to dismiss Tammy's claim that "men can't get married in the United States". Vermont allowed same-sex civil unions in 2000, while the film was released in 2002; as [[WebVideo/ObscurusLupa Obscurus Lupa]] Creator/AllisonPregler noted, same-sex marriage was not possible in Vermont until 2009.

Added: 514

Changed: 333

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Restored a couple of the more glaringly obvious examples; put the remaining ones on the talk page pending proper citations




to:

\n* UnfortunateImplications: Both Obscurus Lupa's review and a cursory glance at the [=IMDb's=] [[http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0364986/reviews user reviews page]] for this film bring up more than a few:
** All Christians are apparently violent homophobes who either actively seek to kill homosexuals, or at least are happy to condone it.
** Furthermore, it's seemingly acceptable to [[spoiler: kill such people]], and even [[spoiler: ''burn them alive'']]. Contrast this with the way that [[spoiler: the death of the lawyer]] is depicted as a horrible thing, even if it doesn't get followed up on very well.
** There are only three female characters in the film; Mildred, who comes across as rather unpleasant, Tammy, who is a complete whackjob, and Ben and Arthur's attorney, who [[spoiler:gets StuffedIntoTheFridge and then is never mentioned again]].

Changed: 182

Removed: 3021

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
unfortunate implications need citations


* UnfortunateImplications: Where to '''begin'''?
** All Christians are apparently violent homophobes who either actively seek to kill homosexuals, or at least are happy to condone it.
*** Actually, it's more like there's basically three types of people in this world: homosexual, psychotically homophobic, and (very rarely) non-psychotically homophobic.
** Furthermore, it's seemingly acceptable to [[spoiler: kill such people]], and even [[spoiler: ''burn them alive'']]. Contrast this with the way that [[spoiler: the death of the lawyer]] is depicted as a horrible thing, even if it doesn't get followed up on very well.
*** Note that Ben and Arthur (affirmed homosexuals), Victor and the attorney (presumed homosexuals per [[{{WordofGod}} Mraovich's statements]]), and the priest (many of whom have been outed as pedophiles in recent years) are [[spoiler: killed]], while Tammy and Stan (patent heterosexuals) [[spoiler: survive]], inferring that [[spoiler: death is the only fate for sexual deviants, while those who practice approved sexual behaviors will stay alive]].
** There are only three female characters in the film; Mildred, who comes across as rather unpleasant, Tammy, who is a complete whackjob, and Ben and Arthur's attorney, who [[spoiler:gets StuffedIntoTheFridge and then is never mentioned again]].
** According to Sam Mraovich, the attorney is supposed to be a lesbian. While no doubt an attempt to give homosexual women some token representation in the film, the fact that she's the only character who shows any real sympathy for Ben and Arthur's situation ends up giving the implication that heterosexual people are fundamentally unable to empathize with homosexuals.
** After an argument, Ben punches Arthur, knocking the latter down. In the following scene, Ben tends to Arthur's wounds and gives the following gem: "That'll teach you to not say stupid things." An already bad comment is made worse by the following: Considering how irritating Arthur has been up to this point, we actually ''cheer'' when Ben throws the punch. This places the audience in an awkward position of tacitly ''condoning'' domestic violence, which sadly presides in many hetero- and homosexual relationships and is ([[ValuesDissonance usually]]) ''condemned''.
** The tagline for the film is "Only the power of love can defeat a holy soldier on a mission." In the film, however, [[spoiler:the ''opposite'' happens: Said "holy soldier" actually defeats the ostensibly loving protagonists by killing them. Such success as accomplished by Victor would render the tagline false.]] With a dose of [[FridgeLogic Fridge Logic]], however, one could reinterpret the tagline and the events in the film to imply that the two protagonists [[spoiler:''lacked'' the love that was necessary to stop Victor]], meaning that Ben and Arthur weren't really in love to begin with. This would give the impression that homosexuals form relationships out of sheer interest ([[MoneyDearBoy sharing the rent]], having a regular sexual partner, proving some point about the viability of a homosexual relationship, etc.) and are simply incapable of (or even uninterested in) committing to steady, trusting relationships based on love.

to:

* UnfortunateImplications: Where to '''begin'''?
** All Christians are apparently violent homophobes who either actively seek to kill homosexuals, or at least are happy to condone it.
*** Actually, it's more like there's basically three types of people in this world: homosexual, psychotically homophobic, and (very rarely) non-psychotically homophobic.
** Furthermore, it's seemingly acceptable to [[spoiler: kill such people]], and even [[spoiler: ''burn them alive'']]. Contrast this with the way that [[spoiler: the death of the lawyer]] is depicted as a horrible thing, even if it doesn't get followed up on very well.
*** Note that Ben and Arthur (affirmed homosexuals), Victor and the attorney (presumed homosexuals per [[{{WordofGod}} Mraovich's statements]]), and the priest (many of whom have been outed as pedophiles in recent years) are [[spoiler: killed]], while Tammy and Stan (patent heterosexuals) [[spoiler: survive]], inferring that [[spoiler: death is the only fate for sexual deviants, while those who practice approved sexual behaviors will stay alive]].
** There are only three female characters in the film; Mildred, who comes across as rather unpleasant, Tammy, who is a complete whackjob, and Ben and Arthur's attorney, who [[spoiler:gets StuffedIntoTheFridge and then is never mentioned again]].
** According to Sam Mraovich, the attorney is supposed to be a lesbian. While no doubt an attempt to give homosexual women some token representation in the film, the fact that she's the only character who shows any real sympathy for Ben and Arthur's situation ends up giving the implication that heterosexual people are fundamentally unable to empathize with homosexuals.
** After an argument, Ben punches Arthur, knocking the latter down. In the following scene, Ben tends to Arthur's wounds and gives the following gem: "That'll teach you to not say stupid things." An already bad comment is made worse by the following: Considering how irritating Arthur has been up to this point, we actually ''cheer'' when Ben throws the punch. This places the audience in an awkward position of tacitly ''condoning'' domestic violence, which sadly presides in many hetero- and homosexual relationships and is ([[ValuesDissonance usually]]) ''condemned''.
** The tagline for the film is "Only the power of love can defeat a holy soldier on a mission." In the film, however, [[spoiler:the ''opposite'' happens: Said "holy soldier" actually defeats the ostensibly loving protagonists by killing them. Such success as accomplished by Victor would render the tagline false.]] With a dose of [[FridgeLogic Fridge Logic]], however, one could reinterpret the tagline and the events in the film to imply that the two protagonists [[spoiler:''lacked'' the love that was necessary to stop Victor]], meaning that Ben and Arthur weren't really in love to begin with. This would give the impression that homosexuals form relationships out of sheer interest ([[MoneyDearBoy sharing the rent]], having a regular sexual partner, proving some point about the viability of a homosexual relationship, etc.) and are simply incapable of (or even uninterested in) committing to steady, trusting relationships based on love.

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Even more strangely, Victor has a very real-looking Beretta which he draws in his apartment near the end of the film, but later both Arthur and himself are back to water pistols.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Not only is that a Zero Context Example, So Bad Its Horrible is not to be used on work/YMMV pages under any circumstances whatsoever


* SoBadItsHorrible
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* SoBadItsHorrible

Changed: 258

Removed: 258

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* DesignatedHero: Arthur. You can ''sorta'' sympathise with him in spite of his
bitchy, narcissistic behavior... at least until he [[spoiler:torches a priest alive]]. Ben to a lesser extent; he comes across as a fairly decent guy overall, but his admission of having affairs with other men behind his then-wife's back really doesn't help.

to:

* DesignatedHero: Arthur. You can ''sorta'' sympathise with him in spite of his
his bitchy, narcissistic behavior... at least until he [[spoiler:torches a priest alive]]. Ben to a lesser extent; he comes across as a fairly decent guy overall, but his admission of having affairs with other men behind his then-wife's back really doesn't help.

Added: 337

Changed: 456

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
moved Dawson Casting from main page


* DesignatedHero: Arthur. You can ''sorta'' sympathise with him in spite of his bitchy, narcissistic behavior... at least until he [[spoiler:torches a priest alive]]. Ben to a lesser extent; he comes across as a fairly decent guy overall, but his admission of having affairs with other men behind his then-wife's back really doesn't help.

to:

* DawsonCasting: Inverted and lampshaded; the guy playing the private investigator looks way too young, which Victor calls him out on. It turns out that he's an ''intern.''
* DesignatedHero: Arthur. You can ''sorta'' sympathise with him in spite of his his
bitchy, narcissistic behavior... at least until he [[spoiler:torches a priest alive]]. Ben to a lesser extent; he comes across as a fairly decent guy overall, but his admission of having affairs with other men behind his then-wife's back really doesn't help.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* {{Squick}}: Arthur's bathtub baptism, mostly because Victor thinks they should be performed with the recipient "naked in Jesus's eyes."

to:

* {{Squick}}: Arthur's bathtub baptism, mostly because Victor thinks they should be performed with the recipient "naked in Jesus's Jesus' eyes."



*** Note that Ben and Arthur (affirmed homosexuals), Victor and the attorney (presumed homosexuals per [[{{WordofGod}} Mraovich's statments]]), and the priest (many of whom have been outed as pedophiles in recent years) are [[spoiler: killed]], while Tammy and Stan (patent heterosexuals) [[spoiler: survive]], inferring that [[spoiler: death is the only fate for sexual deviants, while those who practice approved sexual behaviors will stay alive]].

to:

*** Note that Ben and Arthur (affirmed homosexuals), Victor and the attorney (presumed homosexuals per [[{{WordofGod}} Mraovich's statments]]), statements]]), and the priest (many of whom have been outed as pedophiles in recent years) are [[spoiler: killed]], while Tammy and Stan (patent heterosexuals) [[spoiler: survive]], inferring that [[spoiler: death is the only fate for sexual deviants, while those who practice approved sexual behaviors will stay alive]].



** According to Sam Mraovich, the attorney is supposed to be a lesbian. While no doubt an attempt to give homosexual women some token representation in the film, the fact that she's the only character who shows any real sympathy for Ben and Arthur's situation ends up giving the implication that heterosexual people are fundamentally unable to empathise with homosexuals.

to:

** According to Sam Mraovich, the attorney is supposed to be a lesbian. While no doubt an attempt to give homosexual women some token representation in the film, the fact that she's the only character who shows any real sympathy for Ben and Arthur's situation ends up giving the implication that heterosexual people are fundamentally unable to empathise empathize with homosexuals.



** The tagline for the film is "Only the power of love can defeat a holy soldier on a mission." In the film, however, [[spoiler:the ''opposite'' happens: Said "holy soldier" actually defeats the ostensibly loving protagonists by killing them. Such success as accomplished by Victor would render the tagline false.]] With a dose of [[FridgeLogic Fridge Logic]], however, one could reinterpret the tagline and the events in the film to imply that the two protagonists [[spoiler:''lacked'' the love that was necessary to stop Victor]], meaning that Ben and Arthur weren't really in love to begin with. This would give the impression that homosexuals form relationships out of sheer interest ([[MoneyDearBoy sharing the rent]], having a regular sexual partner, proving some point about the viability of a homosexual relationship, etc.) and are simply incapable (or even uninterested) in committing to steady, trusting relationships based on love.

to:

** The tagline for the film is "Only the power of love can defeat a holy soldier on a mission." In the film, however, [[spoiler:the ''opposite'' happens: Said "holy soldier" actually defeats the ostensibly loving protagonists by killing them. Such success as accomplished by Victor would render the tagline false.]] With a dose of [[FridgeLogic Fridge Logic]], however, one could reinterpret the tagline and the events in the film to imply that the two protagonists [[spoiler:''lacked'' the love that was necessary to stop Victor]], meaning that Ben and Arthur weren't really in love to begin with. This would give the impression that homosexuals form relationships out of sheer interest ([[MoneyDearBoy sharing the rent]], having a regular sexual partner, proving some point about the viability of a homosexual relationship, etc.) and are simply incapable of (or even uninterested) in uninterested in) committing to steady, trusting relationships based on love.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


----



** The tagline for the film is "Only the power of love can defeat a holy soldier on a mission." In the film, however, [[spoiler:the ''opposite'' happens: Said "holy soldier" actually defeats the ostensibly loving protagonists by killing them. Such success as accomplished by Victor would render the tagline false.]] With a dose of [[FridgeLogic Fridge Logic]], however, one could reinterpret the tagline and the events in the film to imply that the two protagonists [[spoiler:''lacked'' the love that was necessary to stop Victor]], meaning that Ben and Arthur weren't really in love to begin with. This would give the impression that homosexuals form relationships out of sheer interest ([[MoneyDearBoy sharing the rent]], having a regular sexual partner, proving some point about the viability of a homosexual relationship, etc.) and are simply incapable (or even uninterested) in committing to steady, trusting relationships based on love.

to:

** The tagline for the film is "Only the power of love can defeat a holy soldier on a mission." In the film, however, [[spoiler:the ''opposite'' happens: Said "holy soldier" actually defeats the ostensibly loving protagonists by killing them. Such success as accomplished by Victor would render the tagline false.]] With a dose of [[FridgeLogic Fridge Logic]], however, one could reinterpret the tagline and the events in the film to imply that the two protagonists [[spoiler:''lacked'' the love that was necessary to stop Victor]], meaning that Ben and Arthur weren't really in love to begin with. This would give the impression that homosexuals form relationships out of sheer interest ([[MoneyDearBoy sharing the rent]], having a regular sexual partner, proving some point about the viability of a homosexual relationship, etc.) and are simply incapable (or even uninterested) in committing to steady, trusting relationships based on love.love.

----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Both films have terrible leading actor-writer-directors, who are fond of showing off their bodies much moreso than most audience members are fond of seeing them.

to:

** Both films have terrible leading actor-writer-directors, who are fond of showing off their bodies much moreso more so than most audience members are fond of seeing them.



** A wedding is an important plot point in both films; in ''The Room'' the wedding never actually happens, while in this film the wedding '''does''' technically happen, but isn't recognised by the state of California.

to:

** A wedding is an important plot point in both films; in ''The Room'' the wedding never actually happens, while in this film the wedding '''does''' technically happen, but isn't recognised recognized by the state of California.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Note that Ben and Arthur (affirmed homosexuals), Victor and the attorney (presumed homosexuals per [[{{WordofGod}} Mraovich's statments]]), and the priest (many of whom have been outed as pedophiles in recent years) are [[spoiler: killed]], while the only other person who has any bearing on the plot and [[spoiler: survives]] is Tammy (a patent heterosexual), meaning that [[spoiler: death is the only fate for sexual deviants, while those who practice approved sexual behaviors will stay alive]].

to:

*** Note that Ben and Arthur (affirmed homosexuals), Victor and the attorney (presumed homosexuals per [[{{WordofGod}} Mraovich's statments]]), and the priest (many of whom have been outed as pedophiles in recent years) are [[spoiler: killed]], while the only other person who has any bearing on the plot Tammy and Stan (patent heterosexuals) [[spoiler: survives]] is Tammy (a patent heterosexual), meaning survive]], inferring that [[spoiler: death is the only fate for sexual deviants, while those who practice approved sexual behaviors will stay alive]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Furthermore, it's seemingly acceptable to kill such people, and even ''burn them alive''. Contrast this with the way that the death of [[spoiler:the lawyer]] is depicted as a horrible thing, even if it doesn't get followed up on very well.

to:

** Furthermore, it's seemingly acceptable to [[spoiler: kill such people, people]], and even [[spoiler: ''burn them alive''. alive'']]. Contrast this with the way that [[spoiler: the death of [[spoiler:the the lawyer]] is depicted as a horrible thing, even if it doesn't get followed up on very well.



** The tagline for the film is "Only the power of love can defeat a holy soldier on a mission." In the film, however, [[spoiler:the ''opposite'' happens: Said "holy soldier" actually defeats the ostensibly loving protagonists by killing them. Such success as accomplished by Victor would render the tagline false.]] With a dose of [[FridgeLogic Fridge Logic]], however, one could reinterpret the tagline and the events in the film to imply that the two protagonists ''lacked'' the love that was necessary to stop Victor, meaning that Ben and Arthur weren't really in love to begin with. This would give the impression that homosexuals form relationships out of sheer interest ([[MoneyDearBoy sharing the rent]], having a regular sexual partner, proving some point about the viability of a homosexual relationship, etc.) and are simply incapable (or even uninterested) in committing to steady, trusting relationships based on love.

to:

** The tagline for the film is "Only the power of love can defeat a holy soldier on a mission." In the film, however, [[spoiler:the ''opposite'' happens: Said "holy soldier" actually defeats the ostensibly loving protagonists by killing them. Such success as accomplished by Victor would render the tagline false.]] With a dose of [[FridgeLogic Fridge Logic]], however, one could reinterpret the tagline and the events in the film to imply that the two protagonists ''lacked'' [[spoiler:''lacked'' the love that was necessary to stop Victor, Victor]], meaning that Ben and Arthur weren't really in love to begin with. This would give the impression that homosexuals form relationships out of sheer interest ([[MoneyDearBoy sharing the rent]], having a regular sexual partner, proving some point about the viability of a homosexual relationship, etc.) and are simply incapable (or even uninterested) in committing to steady, trusting relationships based on love.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Note that Ben and Arthur (affirmed homosexuals), Victor and the attorney (presumed homosexuals per [[{{WordofGod}} Mraovich's statments]]), and the priest (many of whom have been outed as pedophiles in recent years) are [[spoiler: killed]], while the only person who has any bearing on the plot and [[spoiler: survives]] is Tammy (a patent heterosexual), meaning that [[spoiler: death is the only fate for sexual deviants, while those who practice approved sexual behaviors will stay alive]].

to:

*** Note that Ben and Arthur (affirmed homosexuals), Victor and the attorney (presumed homosexuals per [[{{WordofGod}} Mraovich's statments]]), and the priest (many of whom have been outed as pedophiles in recent years) are [[spoiler: killed]], while the only other person who has any bearing on the plot and [[spoiler: survives]] is Tammy (a patent heterosexual), meaning that [[spoiler: death is the only fate for sexual deviants, while those who practice approved sexual behaviors will stay alive]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Note that Ben and Arthur (affirmed homosexuals), Victor and the attorney (presumed homosexuals via [[WordofGod]]), and the priest (many of whom have been outed as pedophiles in recent years) are [[spoiler: killed]], while the only person who has any bearing on the plot and [[spoiler: survives]] is Tammy (a patent heterosexual), meaning that [[spoiler: death is the only fate for sexual deviants, while those who practice approved sexual behaviors will stay alive]].

to:

*** Note that Ben and Arthur (affirmed homosexuals), Victor and the attorney (presumed homosexuals via [[WordofGod]]), per [[{{WordofGod}} Mraovich's statments]]), and the priest (many of whom have been outed as pedophiles in recent years) are [[spoiler: killed]], while the only person who has any bearing on the plot and [[spoiler: survives]] is Tammy (a patent heterosexual), meaning that [[spoiler: death is the only fate for sexual deviants, while those who practice approved sexual behaviors will stay alive]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Note that Ben and Arthur (affirmed homosexuals), Victor and the attorney (presumed homosexuals via [[WordofGod]]), and the priest (many of whom have been outed as pedophiles in recent years) are [[spoiler: killed]], while the only person who has any bearing on the plot and [[spoiler: survives]] is Tammy (a patent heterosexual), meaning that [[spoiler: death is the only fate for sexual deviants, while those who practice approved sexual behaviors will keep living]].

to:

*** Note that Ben and Arthur (affirmed homosexuals), Victor and the attorney (presumed homosexuals via [[WordofGod]]), and the priest (many of whom have been outed as pedophiles in recent years) are [[spoiler: killed]], while the only person who has any bearing on the plot and [[spoiler: survives]] is Tammy (a patent heterosexual), meaning that [[spoiler: death is the only fate for sexual deviants, while those who practice approved sexual behaviors will keep living]].stay alive]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** In fairness, the attorney ''does'' clarify the matter by stating that Ben and Arthur attained a civil union in Vermont, not a marriage. However, this comes ''after'' Ben and Arthur already made the trip to Vermont. Considering that the two protagonists are serious about legally consummating their relationship (not to mention that a trip to any other state that allows same-sex marriage would certainly prove expensive for two paper cup washers at a café), [[FridgeLogic shouldn't the two of them have known beforehand]] that they would only get a ''civil union'' in Vermont, not a full-fledged ''marriage'' license?
** In fact, shouldn't they have learned that the moment they ''walked into the appropriate Vermont office'' to either get a civil union or have their request for a marriage license rebuffed?

to:

** In fairness, the attorney ''does'' clarify the matter by stating that Ben and Arthur attained a civil union in Vermont, not a marriage. However, this comes ''after'' Ben and Arthur already made the trip to Vermont. Considering that the two protagonists are serious about legally ''legally'' consummating their relationship through ''marriage'' (not to mention that a trip to any other state that allows same-sex marriage would certainly prove expensive for two paper cup washers at a café), [[FridgeLogic shouldn't the two of them have known beforehand]] that they would only get a ''civil union'' in Vermont, not a full-fledged ''marriage'' marriage license?
** In fact, shouldn't they Ben and Arthur should have learned that been told as much the moment they ''walked into a Vermont town clerk office and spoke with the appropriate Vermont office'' personnel'', who would have had no choice but to either get correct them and state that a civil union or have was their request for a marriage license rebuffed?only option.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** In fairness, the attorney ''does'' clarify the matter by stating that Ben and Arthur attained a civil union in Vermont, not a marriage. However, this comes ''after'' Ben and Arthur already made the trip to Vermont. Considering that the two protagonists are serious about legally consummating their relationship (not to mention that a trip to any other state that allows same-sex marriage would certainly prove expensive for two paper cup washers at a café), [[FridgeLogic shouldn't the two of them have known beforehand]] that they would only get a ''civil union'' in Vermont, not a full-fledged ''marriage'' license?
** In fact, shouldn't they have learned that the moment they ''walked into the appropriate Vermont office'' to either get a civil union or have their request for a marriage license rebuffed?


Added DiffLines:

*** Note that Ben and Arthur (affirmed homosexuals), Victor and the attorney (presumed homosexuals via [[WordofGod]]), and the priest (many of whom have been outed as pedophiles in recent years) are [[spoiler: killed]], while the only person who has any bearing on the plot and [[spoiler: survives]] is Tammy (a patent heterosexual), meaning that [[spoiler: death is the only fate for sexual deviants, while those who practice approved sexual behaviors will keep living]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Also, Victor's gun is very obviously a painted water pistol, with even the filler cap visible on the rear of the frame.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* SpecialEffectsFailure: The film has almost zero need for effects to begin with, but the gunshots are consistently done with.....well, nothing. There's zero muzzle flash, recoil, or slide movement (with one instance of smoke, appearing after a cutaway and obviously some kind of burning object stuffed in the barrel of the gun), extremely poor sound effects that fail to remain consistent with the same gun, and either [[BloodlessCarnage no wounds at all]] or bullet wounds that only appear after a cut to a different angle. This creates a rather amusing cut where [[spoiler: Victor has no visible mark when shot in the head and stumbling back into the blinds, but after a cutaway for two seconds his face is suddenly ''drenched'' in blood.]] It seems like guns in the ''Ben & Arthur'' universe run on magic, and pulling the trigger simply causes people to fall over dead.

Top