Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** The story even discusses how it's important to be honest and open with your romantic partner; something that strikes chord with anyone who has to put up a front, flaunt their assets, or change themselves just to be more acceptable or "doable".
** Nora's decision to leave her children still holds some water, where it's a taboo about parents who regret becoming parents, and points out that not everyone is meant to be a parent and expecting people to have kids is just wrong.
** Nora's decision to leave her children still holds some water, where it's a taboo about parents who regret becoming parents, and points out that not everyone is meant to be a parent and expecting people to have kids is just wrong.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
no slashing tropes
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
** An only moderately altered interpretation of Nora has the side effect of altering the entire play. In the conventional reading, Nora is a naive innocent who gets a harsh lesson in the world and grows up to move out. A wholly different interpretation is that we're actually seeing a plot involving several conspirators, organized by Nora, to break her tyrannical husband's hold. The Doctor being "ill" is a setup—he's fine and the card with the X through it is a signal he's ready for Nora to take off with him as they've obviously had a thing going on. Nils Krogstad's reasons for going along with the setup are obvious (knowing he's on the chopping block at work because of Torvald, he has nothing to lose and everything to gain revenge-wise) and Nora is also, more kindly, masterminding the reunion of Krogstad with his old girlfriend and her old friend, Christine, who's been the victim of a similar domestic tyranny. Nora is in fact a DiabolicalMastermind[=/=]MagnificentBitch orchestrating her husband's downfall.
to:
** An only moderately altered interpretation of Nora has the side effect of altering the entire play. In the conventional reading, Nora is a naive innocent who gets a harsh lesson in the world and grows up to move out. A wholly different interpretation is that we're actually seeing a plot involving several conspirators, organized by Nora, to break her tyrannical husband's hold. The Doctor being "ill" is a setup—he's fine and the card with the X through it is a signal he's ready for Nora to take off with him as they've obviously had a thing going on. Nils Krogstad's reasons for going along with the setup are obvious (knowing he's on the chopping block at work because of Torvald, he has nothing to lose and everything to gain revenge-wise) and Nora is also, more kindly, masterminding the reunion of Krogstad with his old girlfriend and her old friend, Christine, who's been the victim of a similar domestic tyranny. Nora is in fact a DiabolicalMastermind[=/=]MagnificentBitch DiabolicalMastermind orchestrating her husband's downfall.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* ValuesResonance: Suffice to say its themes have struck a cord with anyone who believes in female rights.
* ValuesDissonance: However Nora's decision to leave her children is if anything ''more'' controversial now. For all his flaws, the audience in the late 1800s could expect that Torvald would attempt to raise the children right. However to a modern audience with increased awareness of child abuse and parental neglect the situation with Torvald and the children can easily be seen as a powder-keg for childhood trauma. The decision today would be treated with a little more moral ambiguity.[[note]]especially since nowadays a woman has ''far'' more say in the decision to have children and many people would make the argument that a woman has a responsibility for choosing to have children where in the late 1800s there was much less choice in the matter.[[/note]]
* ValuesDissonance: However Nora's decision to leave her children is if anything ''more'' controversial now. For all his flaws, the audience in the late 1800s could expect that Torvald would attempt to raise the children right. However to a modern audience with increased awareness of child abuse and parental neglect the situation with Torvald and the children can easily be seen as a powder-keg for childhood trauma. The decision today would be treated with a little more moral ambiguity.[[note]]especially since nowadays a woman has ''far'' more say in the decision to have children and many people would make the argument that a woman has a responsibility for choosing to have children where in the late 1800s there was much less choice in the matter.[[/note]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added line(s) 3 (click to see context) :
----
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
** A less elaborate example: Nora is often portrayed as a naïve victim of a domineering Torvald, but she can also be interpreted as the HypercompetentSidekick of a ManChild who is totally oblivious to how much work his wife puts into maintaining the façade of security and respectability that lets him see himself as a self-made success.
to:
** A less elaborate example: Nora is often portrayed as a naïve victim of a domineering Torvald, but she can also be interpreted as the HypercompetentSidekick HyperCompetentSidekick of a ManChild who is totally oblivious to how much work his wife puts into maintaining the façade of security and respectability that lets him see himself as a self-made success.
Changed line(s) 9 (click to see context) from:
* WriterRevolt: The "happy" ending written to appease the MoralGuardians only comes about because Torvald guilt-trips Nora into staying by way of "ThinkOfTheChildren"; and Nora considers this a FateWorseThanDeath.
to:
* WriterRevolt: The "happy" ending written to appease the MoralGuardians only comes about because Torvald guilt-trips Nora into staying by way of "ThinkOfTheChildren"; and Nora considers this a FateWorseThanDeath.FateWorseThanDeath.
----
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* AlternativeCharacterInterpretation: An only moderately altered interpretation of Nora has the side effect of altering the entire play. In the conventional reading, Nora is a naive innocent who gets a harsh lesson in the world and grows up to move out. A wholly different interpretation is that we're actually seeing a plot involving several conspirators, organized by Nora, to break her tyrannical husband's hold. The Doctor being "ill" is a setup—he's fine and the card with the X through it is a signal he's ready for Nora to take off with him as they've obviously had a thing going on. Nils Krogstad's reasons for going along with the setup are obvious (knowing he's on the chopping block at work because of Torvald, he has nothing to lose and everything to gain revenge-wise) and Nora is also, more kindly, masterminding the reunion of Krogstad with his old girlfriend and her old friend, Christine, who's been the victim of a similar domestic tyranny. Nora is in fact a DiabolicalMastermind[=/=]MagnificentBitch orchestrating her husband's downfall.
to:
* AlternativeCharacterInterpretation: AlternativeCharacterInterpretation:
** An only moderately altered interpretation of Nora has the side effect of altering the entire play. In the conventional reading, Nora is a naive innocent who gets a harsh lesson in the world and grows up to move out. A wholly different interpretation is that we're actually seeing a plot involving several conspirators, organized by Nora, to break her tyrannical husband's hold. The Doctor being "ill" is a setup—he's fine and the card with the X through it is a signal he's ready for Nora to take off with him as they've obviously had a thing going on. Nils Krogstad's reasons for going along with the setup are obvious (knowing he's on the chopping block at work because of Torvald, he has nothing to lose and everything to gain revenge-wise) and Nora is also, more kindly, masterminding the reunion of Krogstad with his old girlfriend and her old friend, Christine, who's been the victim of a similar domestic tyranny. Nora is in fact a DiabolicalMastermind[=/=]MagnificentBitch orchestrating her husband's downfall.
** An only moderately altered interpretation of Nora has the side effect of altering the entire play. In the conventional reading, Nora is a naive innocent who gets a harsh lesson in the world and grows up to move out. A wholly different interpretation is that we're actually seeing a plot involving several conspirators, organized by Nora, to break her tyrannical husband's hold. The Doctor being "ill" is a setup—he's fine and the card with the X through it is a signal he's ready for Nora to take off with him as they've obviously had a thing going on. Nils Krogstad's reasons for going along with the setup are obvious (knowing he's on the chopping block at work because of Torvald, he has nothing to lose and everything to gain revenge-wise) and Nora is also, more kindly, masterminding the reunion of Krogstad with his old girlfriend and her old friend, Christine, who's been the victim of a similar domestic tyranny. Nora is in fact a DiabolicalMastermind[=/=]MagnificentBitch orchestrating her husband's downfall.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Fixing unwanted/unapproved redirects per Ask The Tropers. Also you don\'t use redirect names in works anyway.
Changed line(s) 7 (click to see context) from:
* WhyWouldAnyoneTakeThemBack: ZigZagged. Torvald berates Nora viciously, then just as abruptly decides to forgive her because she is like a child and knows no better. She allows him to hug her and tell her how much he loves her, leaves to get changed - and walks back in with a suitcase to announce that she's leaving him.
to:
* WhyWouldAnyoneTakeThemBack: WhyWouldAnyoneTakeHimBack: ZigZagged. Torvald berates Nora viciously, then just as abruptly decides to forgive her because she is like a child and knows no better. She allows him to hug her and tell her how much he loves her, leaves to get changed - and walks back in with a suitcase to announce that she's leaving him.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 7 (click to see context) from:
* WhyWouldAnyoneTakeHimBack: Averted. Torvald berates Nora viciously, then just as abruptly decides to forgive her because she is like a child and knows no better. She allows him to hug her and tell her how much he loves her, leaves to get changed - and walks back in with a suitcase to announce that she's leaving him.
to:
* WhyWouldAnyoneTakeHimBack: Averted.WhyWouldAnyoneTakeThemBack: ZigZagged. Torvald berates Nora viciously, then just as abruptly decides to forgive her because she is like a child and knows no better. She allows him to hug her and tell her how much he loves her, leaves to get changed - and walks back in with a suitcase to announce that she's leaving him.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** The "scheming Nora" idea actually begot a kind of professional DarkFic in the form of August Strindberg's ''The Father'', sometimes said to have been written in response to Ibsen's play. In that one, the wife and other really do destroy the noble husband with their selfish desires.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 7 (click to see context) from:
* WriterRevolt: The "happy" ending written to appease the MoralGuardians only comes about because Torvald guilt-trips her into staying by way of "ThinkOfTheChildren"; and Nora considers this a FateWorseThanDeath.
to:
* WriterRevolt: The "happy" ending written to appease the MoralGuardians only comes about because Torvald guilt-trips her Nora into staying by way of "ThinkOfTheChildren"; and Nora considers this a FateWorseThanDeath.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 7 (click to see context) from:
* WriterRevolt: The "happy" ending written to appease the MoralGuardians only comes about because Nora's husband guilt-trips her inty staying by way of "ThinkOfTheChildren"; and Nora considers this a FateWorseThanDeath.
to:
* WriterRevolt: The "happy" ending written to appease the MoralGuardians only comes about because Nora's husband Torvald guilt-trips her inty into staying by way of "ThinkOfTheChildren"; and Nora considers this a FateWorseThanDeath.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 6 (click to see context) from:
* WhyWouldAnyoneTakeHimBack: Averted. Torvald berates Nora viciously, then just as abruptly decides to forgive her because she is like a child and knows no better. She allows him to hug her and tell her how much he loves her, leaves to get changed - and walks back in with a suitcase to announce that she's leaving him.
to:
* WhyWouldAnyoneTakeHimBack: Averted. Torvald berates Nora viciously, then just as abruptly decides to forgive her because she is like a child and knows no better. She allows him to hug her and tell her how much he loves her, leaves to get changed - and walks back in with a suitcase to announce that she's leaving him.him.
* WriterRevolt: The "happy" ending written to appease the MoralGuardians only comes about because Nora's husband guilt-trips her inty staying by way of "ThinkOfTheChildren"; and Nora considers this a FateWorseThanDeath.
* WriterRevolt: The "happy" ending written to appease the MoralGuardians only comes about because Nora's husband guilt-trips her inty staying by way of "ThinkOfTheChildren"; and Nora considers this a FateWorseThanDeath.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
* MisaimedFandom: No, this is '''not''' a play about how evil men are and how terrible marriage is. It was intended to show that '''''every''''' human person has pros and contras, ''no matter what their gender/social standing/etc. is''. (i.e., Torvald and Nora's relationship goes down the toilet because their views of each other's were terribly distorted and Nora realized how harmful this was for her so she decided to live her life and not play along anymore... but Krogstad and Kristine managed to strike a deal and went the opposite way, deciding to see if a prospect relationship will work well this time.)
to:
* MisaimedFandom: No, this is '''not''' a play about how evil men are and how terrible marriage is. It was intended to show that '''''every''''' human person has pros It's more a play about how relationships fail when they're based on acting out social expectations instead of on mutual understanding and contras, ''no matter what their gender/social standing/etc. is''. (i.e., respect. Torvald and Nora's relationship goes down the toilet Nora never really ''know'' each other, because their views entire marriage consists of each other's were terribly distorted them "playing house," acting out roles based on their assumptions about how the ideal Husband and Nora realized how harmful this was for her so she decided Wife are meant to live her life and not play along anymore... but Krogstad and act. Meanwhile, Kristine managed to strike a deal and went the opposite way, deciding Nils are able to see if achieve a prospect relationship will work well this time.) happy ending because they truly know each other, warts and all, and form a partnership according to terms that suit them as individuals.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
** A less elaborate example: Nora is often portrayed as a naïve victim of a domineering Torvald, but she can also be interpreted as the HypercompetentSidekick of a ManChild who is totally oblivious to how much work his wife puts into maintaining the façade of security and respectability that he credits entirely to his own hard work and moral purity.
to:
** A less elaborate example: Nora is often portrayed as a naïve victim of a domineering Torvald, but she can also be interpreted as the HypercompetentSidekick of a ManChild who is totally oblivious to how much work his wife puts into maintaining the façade of security and respectability that he credits entirely to his own hard work and moral purity.lets him see himself as a self-made success.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
** A less elaborate example: Nora is often portrayed as a naïve victim of a domineering Torvald, but she can also be interpreted as the HypercompetentSidekick of a ManChild who is totally oblivious to how much work his wife puts into maintaining the façade of security and respectability that he credits entirely to his own hard work and moral purity.
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
**A less elaborate example: Nora is often portrayed as a naïve victim of a domineering Torvald, but she can also be interpreted as the HypercompetentSidekick of a ManChild who is totally oblivious to how much work his wife puts into maintaining the façade of security and respectability that he credits entirely to his own hard work and moral purity.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* CrowningMomentOfHeartwarming: Krogstad's and Linde's reunion and their affirmation of how hard they will work in their marriage.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* AlternativeCharacterInterpretation: An only moderately altered interpretation of Nora has the side effect of altering the entire play. In the conventional reading, Nora is a naive innocent who gets a harsh lesson in the world and grows up to move out. A wholly different interpretation is that we're actually seeing a plot involving several conspirators, organized by Nora, to break her tyrannical husband's hold. The Doctor being "ill" is a setup—he's fine and the card with the X through it is a signal he's ready for Nora to take off with him as they've obviously had a thing going on. Nils Krogstad's reasons for going along with the setup are obvious (knowing he's on the chopping block at work because of Torvald he has nothing to lose and everything to gain revenge-wise) and Nora is also, more kindly, masterminding the reunion of Krogstad with his old girlfriend and her old friend, Christine, who's been the victim of a similar domestic tyranny. Nora is in fact a DiabolicalMastermind orchestrating her husband's downfall.
to:
* AlternativeCharacterInterpretation: An only moderately altered interpretation of Nora has the side effect of altering the entire play. In the conventional reading, Nora is a naive innocent who gets a harsh lesson in the world and grows up to move out. A wholly different interpretation is that we're actually seeing a plot involving several conspirators, organized by Nora, to break her tyrannical husband's hold. The Doctor being "ill" is a setup—he's fine and the card with the X through it is a signal he's ready for Nora to take off with him as they've obviously had a thing going on. Nils Krogstad's reasons for going along with the setup are obvious (knowing he's on the chopping block at work because of Torvald Torvald, he has nothing to lose and everything to gain revenge-wise) and Nora is also, more kindly, masterminding the reunion of Krogstad with his old girlfriend and her old friend, Christine, who's been the victim of a similar domestic tyranny. Nora is in fact a DiabolicalMastermind DiabolicalMastermind[=/=]MagnificentBitch orchestrating her husband's downfall.downfall.
* MisaimedFandom: No, this is '''not''' a play about how evil men are and how terrible marriage is. It was intended to show that '''''every''''' human person has pros and contras, ''no matter what their gender/social standing/etc. is''. (i.e., Torvald and Nora's relationship goes down the toilet because their views of each other's were terribly distorted and Nora realized how harmful this was for her so she decided to live her life and not play along anymore... but Krogstad and Kristine managed to strike a deal and went the opposite way, deciding to see if a prospect relationship will work well this time.)
* MisaimedFandom: No, this is '''not''' a play about how evil men are and how terrible marriage is. It was intended to show that '''''every''''' human person has pros and contras, ''no matter what their gender/social standing/etc. is''. (i.e., Torvald and Nora's relationship goes down the toilet because their views of each other's were terribly distorted and Nora realized how harmful this was for her so she decided to live her life and not play along anymore... but Krogstad and Kristine managed to strike a deal and went the opposite way, deciding to see if a prospect relationship will work well this time.)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
* WhyWouldAnyoneTakeHimBack: Averted. Torvald berates Nora viciously, then just as abruptly decides to forgive her because she is like a child and knows no better. She allows him to hug her and tell her how much she loves her, leaves to get changed - and walks back in with a suitcase to announce that she's leaving him.
to:
* WhyWouldAnyoneTakeHimBack: Averted. Torvald berates Nora viciously, then just as abruptly decides to forgive her because she is like a child and knows no better. She allows him to hug her and tell her how much she he loves her, leaves to get changed - and walks back in with a suitcase to announce that she's leaving him.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1,3 (click to see context) from:
* AlternativeCharacterInterpretation: An only moderately altered interpretation of Nora has the side effect of altering the entire play. In the conventional reading, Nora is a naive innocent who gets a harsh lesson in the world and grows up to move out. A wholly different interpretation is that we're actually seeing a plot involving several conspirators, organized by Nora, to break her tyrannical husband's hold. The Doctor being "ill" is a setup—he's fine and the card with the X through it is a signal he's ready for Nora to take off with him as they've obviously had a thing going on. Nils Krogstad's reasons for going along with the setup are obvious (knowing he's on the chopping block at work because of Torvald he has nothing to lose and everything to gain revenge-wise) and Nora is also, more kindly, masterminding the reunion of Krogstad with his old girlfriend and her old friend, Christine, who's been the victim of a similar domestic tyranny. Nora is in fact a DiabolicalMastermind orchestrating her husband's downfall.
* {{Anvilicious}}: After the truth comes out about how Torvald doesn't really love Nora for Nora, her personality does a complete 180 as she tells Torvald why she must leave him. After spending the entire play as a airheaded ditz, she suddenly becomes serious and well spoken. It is somewhat jarring, but considering the time the play came out in, [[SomeAnvilsNeedToBeDropped one can forgive this for the message which was pretty radical at the time]]
** Um, she does reveal herself to be fairly serious whenever Torvald isn't present. I'd say this is more a case of the mask slipping than a sudden reversal of personality.
* {{Anvilicious}}: After the truth comes out about how Torvald doesn't really love Nora for Nora, her personality does a complete 180 as she tells Torvald why she must leave him. After spending the entire play as a airheaded ditz, she suddenly becomes serious and well spoken. It is somewhat jarring, but considering the time the play came out in, [[SomeAnvilsNeedToBeDropped one can forgive this for the message which was pretty radical at the time]]
** Um, she does reveal herself to be fairly serious whenever Torvald isn't present. I'd say this is more a case of the mask slipping than a sudden reversal of personality.
to:
* AlternativeCharacterInterpretation: An only moderately altered interpretation of Nora has the side effect of altering the entire play. In the conventional reading, Nora is a naive innocent who gets a harsh lesson in the world and grows up to move out. A wholly different interpretation is that we're actually seeing a plot involving several conspirators, organized by Nora, to break her tyrannical husband's hold. The Doctor being "ill" is a setup—he's fine and the card with the X through it is a signal he's ready for Nora to take off with him as they've obviously had a thing going on. Nils Krogstad's reasons for going along with the setup are obvious (knowing he's on the chopping block at work because of Torvald he has nothing to lose and everything to gain revenge-wise) and Nora is also, more kindly, masterminding the reunion of Krogstad with his old girlfriend and her old friend, Christine, who's been the victim of a similar domestic tyranny. Nora is in fact a DiabolicalMastermind orchestrating her husband's downfall.
downfall.
*{{Anvilicious}}: SomeAnvilsNeedToBeDropped: After the truth comes out about how Torvald doesn't really love Nora for Nora, she removes her personality does a complete 180 as she proverbial mask and tells Torvald why she must leave him. After spending the entire play masquerading as a an airheaded ditz, ditz whenever her husband's around, she suddenly becomes shows him how serious and well spoken. It spoken she truly is. If the effect is somewhat jarring, but the message is downright radical considering the time when the play came out in, [[SomeAnvilsNeedToBeDropped one can forgive this for the message which was pretty radical at the time]]
** Um, she does reveal herself to be fairly serious whenever Torvald isn't present. I'd say this is more a case of the mask slipping than a sudden reversal of personality.out.
*
** Um, she does reveal herself to be fairly serious whenever Torvald isn't present. I'd say this is more a case of the mask slipping than a sudden reversal of personality.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* Anvilicious: After the truth comes out about how Torvald doesn't really love Nora for Nora, her personality does a complete 180 as she tells Torvald why she must leave him. After spending the entire play as a airheaded ditz, she suddenly becomes serious and well spoken. It is somewhat jarring, but considering the time the play came out in, [[SomeAnvilsNeedToBeDropped one can forgive this for the message which was pretty radical at the time]]
to:
* Anvilicious: AlternativeCharacterInterpretation: An only moderately altered interpretation of Nora has the side effect of altering the entire play. In the conventional reading, Nora is a naive innocent who gets a harsh lesson in the world and grows up to move out. A wholly different interpretation is that we're actually seeing a plot involving several conspirators, organized by Nora, to break her tyrannical husband's hold. The Doctor being "ill" is a setup—he's fine and the card with the X through it is a signal he's ready for Nora to take off with him as they've obviously had a thing going on. Nils Krogstad's reasons for going along with the setup are obvious (knowing he's on the chopping block at work because of Torvald he has nothing to lose and everything to gain revenge-wise) and Nora is also, more kindly, masterminding the reunion of Krogstad with his old girlfriend and her old friend, Christine, who's been the victim of a similar domestic tyranny. Nora is in fact a DiabolicalMastermind orchestrating her husband's downfall.
* {{Anvilicious}}: After the truth comes out about how Torvald doesn't really love Nora for Nora, her personality does a complete 180 as she tells Torvald why she must leave him. After spending the entire play as a airheaded ditz, she suddenly becomes serious and well spoken. It is somewhat jarring, but considering the time the play came out in, [[SomeAnvilsNeedToBeDropped one can forgive this for the message which was pretty radical at the time]]
* {{Anvilicious}}: After the truth comes out about how Torvald doesn't really love Nora for Nora, her personality does a complete 180 as she tells Torvald why she must leave him. After spending the entire play as a airheaded ditz, she suddenly becomes serious and well spoken. It is somewhat jarring, but considering the time the play came out in, [[SomeAnvilsNeedToBeDropped one can forgive this for the message which was pretty radical at the time]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** Um, she does reveal herself to be fairly serious whenever Torvald isn't present. I'd say this is more a case of the mask slipping than a sudden reversal of personality.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Moved from the main page
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* WhyWouldAnyoneTakeHimBack: Averted. Torvald berates Nora viciously then just as abruptly decides to forgive her because she is like a child and knows no better. She allows him to hug her and tell her how much she loves her, leaves to get changed - and walks back in with a suitcase to announce that she's leaving him.
to:
* Anvilicious: After the truth comes out about how Torvald doesn't really love Nora for Nora, her personality does a complete 180 as she tells Torvald why she must leave him. After spending the entire play as a airheaded ditz, she suddenly becomes serious and well spoken. It is somewhat jarring, but considering the time the play came out in, [[SomeAnvilsNeedToBeDropped one can forgive this for the message which was pretty radical at the time]]
* WhyWouldAnyoneTakeHimBack: Averted. Torvald berates Noraviciously viciously, then just as abruptly decides to forgive her because she is like a child and knows no better. She allows him to hug her and tell her how much she loves her, leaves to get changed - and walks back in with a suitcase to announce that she's leaving him.
* WhyWouldAnyoneTakeHimBack: Averted. Torvald berates Nora
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Deleted line(s) 1,2 (click to see context) :
* {{Deconstruction}}: Of the traditional marriage. As Nora puts it, "[Many woman] sacrificed [their honor for their husbands]" when Torvald protest that a man would never surrender his honor to even his wife.
* {{Reconstruction}}: The reunion scene between Linde and Krogstand makes it clear that their relationship is based on understanding. So traditional marriage can work when the couple respect each other.
* {{Reconstruction}}: The reunion scene between Linde and Krogstand makes it clear that their relationship is based on understanding. So traditional marriage can work when the couple respect each other.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* {{Reconstruction}}: The reunion scene between Linde and Krogstand makes it clear that their relationship is based on understanding and would probably have a healthier marriage.
to:
* {{Reconstruction}}: The reunion scene between Linde and Krogstand makes it clear that their relationship is based on understanding and would probably have a healthier marriage.understanding. So traditional marriage can work when the couple respect each other.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1,2 (click to see context) from:
* {{Deconstruction}}: Of the traditional marriage. As Nora puts it, "[Many woman] sacrified [their honor for their husbands]" when Torvald protest that a man would never surrender his honor to even his wife.
* {{Reconstruction}}: The reunion scene between Linde and Krogstand makes it clear that their relationship is based on understanding and would probably have a healthier marraige.
* {{Reconstruction}}: The reunion scene between Linde and Krogstand makes it clear that their relationship is based on understanding and would probably have a healthier marraige.
to:
* {{Deconstruction}}: Of the traditional marriage. As Nora puts it, "[Many woman] sacrified sacrificed [their honor for their husbands]" when Torvald protest that a man would never surrender his honor to even his wife.
* {{Reconstruction}}: The reunion scene between Linde and Krogstand makes it clear that their relationship is based on understanding and would probably have a healthiermarraige.marriage.
* WhyWouldAnyoneTakeHimBack: Averted. Torvald berates Nora viciously then just as abruptly decides to forgive her because she is like a child and knows no better. She allows him to hug her and tell her how much she loves her, leaves to get changed - and walks back in with a suitcase to announce that she's leaving him.
* {{Reconstruction}}: The reunion scene between Linde and Krogstand makes it clear that their relationship is based on understanding and would probably have a healthier
* WhyWouldAnyoneTakeHimBack: Averted. Torvald berates Nora viciously then just as abruptly decides to forgive her because she is like a child and knows no better. She allows him to hug her and tell her how much she loves her, leaves to get changed - and walks back in with a suitcase to announce that she's leaving him.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1,2 (click to see context) from:
* {{Deconstruction}}: Of the traditional marriage. As Nora puts it, "[Many woman] sacrified [their honor for their husbands]" despite Torvald protesting a man would never surrender his honor to even his wife.
* {{Reconstruction}}: The reunion scene between Linde and Krogstand makes it clear that their relationship is based on understanding and would they would probably have a healthier marraige.
* {{Reconstruction}}: The reunion scene between Linde and Krogstand makes it clear that their relationship is based on understanding and would they would probably have a healthier marraige.
to:
* {{Deconstruction}}: Of the traditional marriage. As Nora puts it, "[Many woman] sacrified [their honor for their husbands]" despite when Torvald protesting protest that a man would never surrender his honor to even his wife.
* {{Reconstruction}}: The reunion scene between Linde and Krogstand makes it clear that their relationship is based on understanding and wouldthey would probably have a healthier marraige.
* {{Reconstruction}}: The reunion scene between Linde and Krogstand makes it clear that their relationship is based on understanding and would
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* {{Deconstruction}}: Of the traditional marriage. As Nora puts it, "[Many woman] sacrified [their honor for their husbands]" despite Torvald protesting a man would never surrender his honor to even his wife. And then.
to:
* {{Deconstruction}}: Of the traditional marriage. As Nora puts it, "[Many woman] sacrified [their honor for their husbands]" despite Torvald protesting a man would never surrender his honor to even his wife. And then.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1,2 (click to see context) from:
Deconstruction: Of the traditional marriage. As Nora puts it, "[Many woman] sacrified [their honor for their husbands]" despite Torvald protesting a man would never surrender his honor to even his wife. And then.
Reconstruction: The reunion scene between Linde and Krogstand makes it clear that their relationship is based on understanding and would they would probably have a healthier marraige.
Reconstruction: The reunion scene between Linde and Krogstand makes it clear that their relationship is based on understanding and would they would probably have a healthier marraige.
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
Deconstruction: Of the traditional marriage. As Nora puts it, "[Many woman] sacrified [their honor for their husbands]" despite Torvald protesting a man would never surrender his honor to even his wife. And then.
Reconstruction: The reunion scene between Linde and Krogstand makes it clear that their relationship is based on understanding and would they would probably have a healthier marraige.
Reconstruction: The reunion scene between Linde and Krogstand makes it clear that their relationship is based on understanding and would they would probably have a healthier marraige.