Follow TV Tropes

Following

History WebAnimation / TurnaboutStorm

Go To

OR

Added: 1803

Changed: 1472

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ArtisticLicenceLaw: The story climaxes in Parts 4 and 5 when [[spoiler:Phoenix and Twilight (initially) struggle to present evidence implicating a person ''other'' than Dash in the murder and thereby clearing her name]]. Though it ''could'' be explained away as a quirk of Equestria's (and by logical extension, ''Ace Attonerney's'' setting's) legal system, this violates a central tenet of RealLife criminal law, ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_dubio_pro_reo in dubio pro reo]]'' (When In Doubt, For The Accused). [[spoiler: At this point in the trial, the defence has already successfully dismantled much of the alleged evidence linking Dash to the killing, whittling the prosecution's case down to circumstantial evidence such as Dash's possible motive as well as her presence near the crime scene - both of which make for a laughably flimsy case on their own merit[[note]]After all, Ace Swift still had ''several'' enemies and was killed in a publicly accessible place[[/note]] and offer plenty of grounds for an acquittal. The burden of proving Dash's participation in Ace Swift's death ''beyond'' reasonable doubt - beginning with reliably establishing the causality of Dash's actions - rests squarely with prosecutor Trixie; it's not on the defence to remove every last shred of suspicion]]. This principle turns out to be ''very'' well-advised when [[spoiler:it is ultimately revealed that Ace Swift was killed due to ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vis_major vis major]]'')]].

to:

* ArtisticLicenceLaw: ArtisticLicenceLaw:
**
The story climaxes in Parts 4 and 5 when [[spoiler:Phoenix and Twilight (initially) struggle to present evidence implicating a person ''other'' than Dash in the murder and thereby clearing her name]]. Though it ''could'' be explained away as a quirk of Equestria's (and by logical extension, ''Ace Attonerney's'' setting's) legal system, this violates a central tenet of RealLife criminal law, ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_dubio_pro_reo in dubio pro reo]]'' (When In Doubt, For The Accused). [[spoiler: At this point in the trial, the defence has already successfully dismantled much of the alleged evidence linking Dash to the killing, whittling the prosecution's case down to circumstantial evidence such as Dash's possible motive as well as her presence near the crime scene - both of which make for a laughably flimsy case on their own merit[[note]]After all, Ace Swift still had ''several'' enemies and was killed in a publicly accessible place[[/note]] and offer plenty of grounds for an acquittal. The burden of proving Dash's participation in Ace Swift's death ''beyond'' reasonable doubt - beginning with reliably establishing the causality of Dash's actions - rests squarely with prosecutor Trixie; it's not on the defence to remove every last shred of suspicion]]. This principle turns out to be ''very'' well-advised when [[spoiler:it is ultimately revealed that Ace Swift was killed due to ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vis_major vis major]]'')]].major]]'')]].
** Likewise, the final reveal of [[spoiler:Ace Swift ending up being killed by a thunderbolt discharging from a charged thunder-cloud that Rainbow Dash carelessly parked next to him could still open up Rainbow Dash to charges of negligent homicide]]. This possibility is however [[NoEndorHolocaust not brought up at any point]].

Changed: 11

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ArtisticLicenceLaw: The story climaxes in Parts 4 and 5 when [[spoiler:Phoenix and Twilight (initially) struggle to present evidence implicating a person ''other'' than Dash in the murder and thereby clearing her name]]. Though it ''could'' be explained away as a quirk of Equestria's (and by logical extension, ''Ace Attonerney's'' setting's) legal system, this violates a central tenet of RealLife criminal law, ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_dubio_pro_reo in dubio pro reo]]'' (When In Doubt, For The Accused). [[spoiler: At this point in the trial, the defence has already successfully dismantled much of the alleged evidence linking Dash to the killing, whittling the prosecution's case down to circumstantial evidence such as Dash's possible motive as well as her presence near the crime scene - both of which make for a laughably flimsy case on their own merit[[note]]After all, Ace Swift still had ''several'' enemies and was killed in a publicly accessible place[[/note]] and offer plenty of grounds for an acquittal. The burden of proving Dash's participation in Ace Swift's death ''beyond'' reasonable doubt - beginning with reliably establishing the causality of Dash's actions - rests squarely with prosecutor Trixie; it's not on the defence to remove every last shred of suspicion]]. This principle ultimately turns out to be ''very'' well-advised when [[spoiler:it is ultimately revealed that Ace Swift was killed due to ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vis_major vis major]]'')]].

to:

* ArtisticLicenceLaw: The story climaxes in Parts 4 and 5 when [[spoiler:Phoenix and Twilight (initially) struggle to present evidence implicating a person ''other'' than Dash in the murder and thereby clearing her name]]. Though it ''could'' be explained away as a quirk of Equestria's (and by logical extension, ''Ace Attonerney's'' setting's) legal system, this violates a central tenet of RealLife criminal law, ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_dubio_pro_reo in dubio pro reo]]'' (When In Doubt, For The Accused). [[spoiler: At this point in the trial, the defence has already successfully dismantled much of the alleged evidence linking Dash to the killing, whittling the prosecution's case down to circumstantial evidence such as Dash's possible motive as well as her presence near the crime scene - both of which make for a laughably flimsy case on their own merit[[note]]After all, Ace Swift still had ''several'' enemies and was killed in a publicly accessible place[[/note]] and offer plenty of grounds for an acquittal. The burden of proving Dash's participation in Ace Swift's death ''beyond'' reasonable doubt - beginning with reliably establishing the causality of Dash's actions - rests squarely with prosecutor Trixie; it's not on the defence to remove every last shred of suspicion]]. This principle ultimately turns out to be ''very'' well-advised when [[spoiler:it is ultimately revealed that Ace Swift was killed due to ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vis_major vis major]]'')]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ArtisticLicenceLaw: The story climaxes in Parts 4 and 5 when [[spoiler:Phoenix and Twilight (initially) struggle to present evidence implicating a person ''other'' than Dash in the murder and thereby clearing her name]]. Though it ''could'' be explained away as a quirk of Equestria's (and by logical extension, ''Ace Attonerney's'' setting's) legal system, this violates a central tenet of RealLife criminal law, ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_dubio_pro_reo in dubio pro reo]]'' (When In Doubt, For The Accused). [[spoiler: At this point in the trial, the defence has already successfully dismantled much of the alleged evidence linking Dash to the killing, whittling the prosecution's case down to circumstantial evidence such as Dash's possible motive as well as her presence near the crime scene - both of which make for a laughably flimsy case on their own merit[[note]]After all, Ace Swift had ''several'' enemies and was killed in a publicly accessible place[[/note]] and offer plenty of grounds for an acquittal. The burden of proving Dash's participation in Ace Swift's death ''beyond'' reasonable doubt - beginning with reliably establishing the causality of Dash's actions - rests squarely with prosecutor Trixie; it's not on the defence to remove every last shred of suspicion]]. This principle ultimately turns out to be ''very'' well-advised when [[spoiler:it is ultimately revealed that Ace Swift was killed due to ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vis_major vis major]]'')]].

to:

* ArtisticLicenceLaw: The story climaxes in Parts 4 and 5 when [[spoiler:Phoenix and Twilight (initially) struggle to present evidence implicating a person ''other'' than Dash in the murder and thereby clearing her name]]. Though it ''could'' be explained away as a quirk of Equestria's (and by logical extension, ''Ace Attonerney's'' setting's) legal system, this violates a central tenet of RealLife criminal law, ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_dubio_pro_reo in dubio pro reo]]'' (When In Doubt, For The Accused). [[spoiler: At this point in the trial, the defence has already successfully dismantled much of the alleged evidence linking Dash to the killing, whittling the prosecution's case down to circumstantial evidence such as Dash's possible motive as well as her presence near the crime scene - both of which make for a laughably flimsy case on their own merit[[note]]After all, Ace Swift still had ''several'' enemies and was killed in a publicly accessible place[[/note]] and offer plenty of grounds for an acquittal. The burden of proving Dash's participation in Ace Swift's death ''beyond'' reasonable doubt - beginning with reliably establishing the causality of Dash's actions - rests squarely with prosecutor Trixie; it's not on the defence to remove every last shred of suspicion]]. This principle ultimately turns out to be ''very'' well-advised when [[spoiler:it is ultimately revealed that Ace Swift was killed due to ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vis_major vis major]]'')]].

Changed: 64

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ArtisticLicenceLaw: The story climaxes in Parts 4 and 5 when [[spoiler:Phoenix and Twilight (initially) struggle to present evidence implicating a person ''other'' than Dash in the murder and thereby clearing her name]]. Though it ''could'' be explained away as a quirk of the Equestrian legal system, this violates a central tenet of RealLife criminal law, ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_dubio_pro_reo in dubio pro reo]]'' (When In Doubt, For The Accused). [[spoiler: At this point in the trial, the defence has already successfully dismantled much of the alleged evidence linking Dash to the killing, whittling the prosecution's case down to circumstantial evidence such as Dash's possible motive as well as her presence near the crime scene - both of which make for a laughably flimsy case on their own merit[[note]]After all, Ace Swift had ''several'' enemies and was killed in a publicly accessible place[[/note]] and offer plenty of grounds for an acquittal. The burden of proving Dash's participation in Ace Swift's death ''beyond'' reasonable doubt - beginning with reliably establishing the causality of Dash's actions - rests squarely with prosecutor Trixie; it's not on the defence to remove every last shred of suspicion]]. This principle ultimately turns out to be ''very'' well-advised when [[spoiler:it is ultimately revealed that Ace Swift was killed due to ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vis_major vis major]]'')]].

to:

* ArtisticLicenceLaw: The story climaxes in Parts 4 and 5 when [[spoiler:Phoenix and Twilight (initially) struggle to present evidence implicating a person ''other'' than Dash in the murder and thereby clearing her name]]. Though it ''could'' be explained away as a quirk of the Equestrian Equestria's (and by logical extension, ''Ace Attonerney's'' setting's) legal system, this violates a central tenet of RealLife criminal law, ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_dubio_pro_reo in dubio pro reo]]'' (When In Doubt, For The Accused). [[spoiler: At this point in the trial, the defence has already successfully dismantled much of the alleged evidence linking Dash to the killing, whittling the prosecution's case down to circumstantial evidence such as Dash's possible motive as well as her presence near the crime scene - both of which make for a laughably flimsy case on their own merit[[note]]After all, Ace Swift had ''several'' enemies and was killed in a publicly accessible place[[/note]] and offer plenty of grounds for an acquittal. The burden of proving Dash's participation in Ace Swift's death ''beyond'' reasonable doubt - beginning with reliably establishing the causality of Dash's actions - rests squarely with prosecutor Trixie; it's not on the defence to remove every last shred of suspicion]]. This principle ultimately turns out to be ''very'' well-advised when [[spoiler:it is ultimately revealed that Ace Swift was killed due to ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vis_major vis major]]'')]].

Changed: 76

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ArtisticLicenceLaw: The story climaxes in Parts 4 and 5 when [[spoiler:Phoenix and Twilight (initially) struggle to present evidence implicating a person ''other'' than Dash in the murder and thereby clearing her name]]. Though it ''could'' be explained away as a quirk of the Equestrian legal system, this violates a central tenet of RealLife criminal law, ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_dubio_pro_reo in dubio pro reo]]'' (When In Doubt, For The Accused). [[spoiler: At this point in the trial, the defence has already successfully dismantled much of the alleged evidence linking Dash to the killing, whittling the prosecution's case down to circumstantial evidence such as Dash's possible motive as well as her presence near the crime scene - both of which make for a laughably flimsy case on their own merit[[note]]After all, Ace Swift had ''several'' enemies and was killed in a publicly accessible place[[/note]] and offer plenty of grounds for an acquittal. The burden of proving Dash's participation in Ace Swift's death ''beyond'' reasonable doubt - beginning with reliably establishing the causality of Dash's actions - rests squarely with prosecutor Trixie; it's not on the defence to remove every last shred of suspicion]]. This principle ultimately turns out to be ''very'' well-advised when [[spoiler:it is ultimately revealed that Ace Swift accidentally killed himself)]].

to:

* ArtisticLicenceLaw: The story climaxes in Parts 4 and 5 when [[spoiler:Phoenix and Twilight (initially) struggle to present evidence implicating a person ''other'' than Dash in the murder and thereby clearing her name]]. Though it ''could'' be explained away as a quirk of the Equestrian legal system, this violates a central tenet of RealLife criminal law, ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_dubio_pro_reo in dubio pro reo]]'' (When In Doubt, For The Accused). [[spoiler: At this point in the trial, the defence has already successfully dismantled much of the alleged evidence linking Dash to the killing, whittling the prosecution's case down to circumstantial evidence such as Dash's possible motive as well as her presence near the crime scene - both of which make for a laughably flimsy case on their own merit[[note]]After all, Ace Swift had ''several'' enemies and was killed in a publicly accessible place[[/note]] and offer plenty of grounds for an acquittal. The burden of proving Dash's participation in Ace Swift's death ''beyond'' reasonable doubt - beginning with reliably establishing the causality of Dash's actions - rests squarely with prosecutor Trixie; it's not on the defence to remove every last shred of suspicion]]. This principle ultimately turns out to be ''very'' well-advised when [[spoiler:it is ultimately revealed that Ace Swift accidentally was killed himself)]].due to ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vis_major vis major]]'')]].

Changed: 15

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ArtisticLicenceLaw: The story climaxes in Parts 4 and 5 when [[spoiler:Phoenix and Twilight (initially) struggle to present evidence implicating a person ''other'' than Dash in the murder and thereby clearing her name]]. Though it ''could'' be explained away as a quirk of the Equestrian legal system, this violates a central tenet of RealLife criminal law, ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_dubio_pro_reo in dubio pro reo]]'' (When In Doubt, For The Accused). [[spoiler: At this point in the trial, the defence has already successfully dismantled much of the alleged evidence linking Dash to the killing, whittling the prosecution's case down to circumstantial evidence such as Dash's possible motive as well as her presence near the crime scene - both of which make for a laughably flimsy case on their own merit[[note]]After all, Ace Swift had many enemies and was killed in a public accessible place[[/note]] and offer plenty of grounds for an acquittal. The burden of proving Dash's participation in Ace Swift's death ''beyond'' reasonable doubt - beginning with reliably establishing the causality of Dash's actions - rests squarely with prosecutor Trixie; it's not on the defence to remove every last shred of suspicion]]. This principle ultimately turns out to be ''very'' well-advised when [[spoiler:it is ultimately revealed that Ace Swift accidentally killed himself)]].

to:

* ArtisticLicenceLaw: The story climaxes in Parts 4 and 5 when [[spoiler:Phoenix and Twilight (initially) struggle to present evidence implicating a person ''other'' than Dash in the murder and thereby clearing her name]]. Though it ''could'' be explained away as a quirk of the Equestrian legal system, this violates a central tenet of RealLife criminal law, ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_dubio_pro_reo in dubio pro reo]]'' (When In Doubt, For The Accused). [[spoiler: At this point in the trial, the defence has already successfully dismantled much of the alleged evidence linking Dash to the killing, whittling the prosecution's case down to circumstantial evidence such as Dash's possible motive as well as her presence near the crime scene - both of which make for a laughably flimsy case on their own merit[[note]]After all, Ace Swift had many ''several'' enemies and was killed in a public publicly accessible place[[/note]] and offer plenty of grounds for an acquittal. The burden of proving Dash's participation in Ace Swift's death ''beyond'' reasonable doubt - beginning with reliably establishing the causality of Dash's actions - rests squarely with prosecutor Trixie; it's not on the defence to remove every last shred of suspicion]]. This principle ultimately turns out to be ''very'' well-advised when [[spoiler:it is ultimately revealed that Ace Swift accidentally killed himself)]].

Changed: 98

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ArtisticLicenceLaw: The story climaxes in Parts 4 and 5 when [[spoiler:Phoenix and Twilight (initially) struggle to present evidence implicating a person ''other'' than Dash in the murder and thereby clearing her name]]. Though it ''could'' be explained away as a quirk of the Equestrian legal system, this violates a central tenet of RealLife criminal law, ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_dubio_pro_reo in dubio pro reo]]'' (When In Doubt, For The Accused). [[spoiler: At this point in the trial, the defence has already successfully dismantled much of the alleged evidence linking Dash to the killing, whittling the prosecution's case down to circumstantial evidence such as Dash's possible motive as well as her presence near the crime scene - both of which make for a laughably flimsy case on their own merit and offer plenty of grounds for an acquittal. The burden of proving Dash's participation in Ace Swift's death ''beyond'' reasonable doubt - beginning with reliably establishing the causality of Dash's actions - rests squarely with prosecutor Trixie; it's not on the defence to remove every last shred of suspicion]]. This principle ultimately turns out to be ''very'' well-advised when [[spoiler:it is ultimately revealed that Ace Swift accidentally killed himself)]].

to:

* ArtisticLicenceLaw: The story climaxes in Parts 4 and 5 when [[spoiler:Phoenix and Twilight (initially) struggle to present evidence implicating a person ''other'' than Dash in the murder and thereby clearing her name]]. Though it ''could'' be explained away as a quirk of the Equestrian legal system, this violates a central tenet of RealLife criminal law, ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_dubio_pro_reo in dubio pro reo]]'' (When In Doubt, For The Accused). [[spoiler: At this point in the trial, the defence has already successfully dismantled much of the alleged evidence linking Dash to the killing, whittling the prosecution's case down to circumstantial evidence such as Dash's possible motive as well as her presence near the crime scene - both of which make for a laughably flimsy case on their own merit merit[[note]]After all, Ace Swift had many enemies and was killed in a public accessible place[[/note]] and offer plenty of grounds for an acquittal. The burden of proving Dash's participation in Ace Swift's death ''beyond'' reasonable doubt - beginning with reliably establishing the causality of Dash's actions - rests squarely with prosecutor Trixie; it's not on the defence to remove every last shred of suspicion]]. This principle ultimately turns out to be ''very'' well-advised when [[spoiler:it is ultimately revealed that Ace Swift accidentally killed himself)]].

Changed: 16

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ArtisticLicenceLaw: The story climaxes in Parts 4 and 5 when [[spoiler:Phoenix and Twilight (initially) struggle to present evidence implicating a person ''other'' than Dash in the murder and thereby clearing her name]]. Though it ''could'' be explained away as a quirk of the Equestrian legal system, this violates a central tenet of RealLife criminal law, ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_dubio_pro_reo in dubio pro reo]]'' (When In Doubt, For The Accused). [[spoiler: At this point in the trial, the defence has already successfully dismantled much of the evidence linking Dash to the alleged killing, whittling the prosecution's case down to circumstantial evidence such as Dash's possible motive as well as her presence near the crime scene - both of which make for a laughably flimsy case on their own merit and offer plenty of grounds for an acquittal. The burden of proving Dash's participation in Ace Swift's death ''beyond'' reasonable doubt - beginning with reliably establishing the causality of Dash's actions - rests squarely with prosecutor Trixie; it's not on the defence to remove every last shred of suspicion]]. This principle ultimately turns out to be ''very'' well-advised when [[spoiler:it is ultimately revealed that Ace Swift accidentally killed himself)]].

to:

* ArtisticLicenceLaw: The story climaxes in Parts 4 and 5 when [[spoiler:Phoenix and Twilight (initially) struggle to present evidence implicating a person ''other'' than Dash in the murder and thereby clearing her name]]. Though it ''could'' be explained away as a quirk of the Equestrian legal system, this violates a central tenet of RealLife criminal law, ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_dubio_pro_reo in dubio pro reo]]'' (When In Doubt, For The Accused). [[spoiler: At this point in the trial, the defence has already successfully dismantled much of the alleged evidence linking Dash to the alleged killing, whittling the prosecution's case down to circumstantial evidence such as Dash's possible motive as well as her presence near the crime scene - both of which make for a laughably flimsy case on their own merit and offer plenty of grounds for an acquittal. The burden of proving Dash's participation in Ace Swift's death ''beyond'' reasonable doubt - beginning with reliably establishing the causality of Dash's actions - rests squarely with prosecutor Trixie; it's not on the defence to remove every last shred of suspicion]]. This principle ultimately turns out to be ''very'' well-advised when [[spoiler:it is ultimately revealed that Ace Swift accidentally killed himself)]].

Changed: 26

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ArtisticLicenceLaw: The story climaxes in Parts 4 and 5 when [[spoiler:Phoenix and Twilight (initially) struggle to present evidence implicating a person ''other'' than Dash in the murder and thereby clearing her name]]. Though it ''could'' be explained away as a quirk of the Equestrian legal system, this violates a central tenet of RealLife criminal law, ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_dubio_pro_reo in dubio pro reo]]'' (When In Doubt, For The Accused). [[spoiler: At this point in the trial, the defence has already successfully dismantled much of the evidence linking Dash to the alleged killing, whittling the prosecution's case down to circumstantial evidence such as Dash's possible motive as well as her presence near the crime scene - both of which make for a laughably flimsy case on their own merit and offer plenty of grounds for an acquittal. The burden of proving Dash's participation in Ace Swift's death ''beyond'' reasonable doubt - beginning with reliably establishing the causality of Dash's actions - rests squarely with prosecutor Trixie, and it's not on the defence to remove every last shred of suspicion]]. This principle ultimately turns out to be ''very'' well-advised when it is ultimately revealed that [[spoiler:Ace Swift accidentally killed himself)]].

to:

* ArtisticLicenceLaw: The story climaxes in Parts 4 and 5 when [[spoiler:Phoenix and Twilight (initially) struggle to present evidence implicating a person ''other'' than Dash in the murder and thereby clearing her name]]. Though it ''could'' be explained away as a quirk of the Equestrian legal system, this violates a central tenet of RealLife criminal law, ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_dubio_pro_reo in dubio pro reo]]'' (When In Doubt, For The Accused). [[spoiler: At this point in the trial, the defence has already successfully dismantled much of the evidence linking Dash to the alleged killing, whittling the prosecution's case down to circumstantial evidence such as Dash's possible motive as well as her presence near the crime scene - both of which make for a laughably flimsy case on their own merit and offer plenty of grounds for an acquittal. The burden of proving Dash's participation in Ace Swift's death ''beyond'' reasonable doubt - beginning with reliably establishing the causality of Dash's actions - rests squarely with prosecutor Trixie, and Trixie; it's not on the defence to remove every last shred of suspicion]]. This principle ultimately turns out to be ''very'' well-advised when it [[spoiler:it is ultimately revealed that [[spoiler:Ace Ace Swift accidentally killed himself)]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ArtisticLicenceLaw: The story climaxes in Parts 4 and 5 when [[spoiler:Phoenix and Twilight (initially) struggle to present evidence implicating a person ''other'' than Dash in the murder and thereby clearing her name]]. Though it ''could'' be explained away as a quirk of the Equestrian legal system, this violates a central tenet of RealLife criminal law, ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_dubio_pro_reo in dubio pro reo]]'' (When In Doubt, For The Accused). [[spoiler: At this point in the trial, the defence has already sucessfully dismantled much of the evidence linking Dash to the alleged killing, whittling the prosecution's case down to circumstantial evidence such as Dash's possible motive as well as her presence near the crime scene - both of which make for a laughably flimsy case on their own merit and offer plenty of grounds for an acquittal. The burden of proving Dash's participation in Ace Swift's death ''beyond'' reasonable doubt - beginning with reliably establishing the causality of Dash's actions - rests squarely with prosecutor Trixie, and it's not on the defence to remove every last shred of suspicion]]. This principle ultimately turns out to be ''very'' well-advised when it is ultimately revealed that [[spoiler:Ace Swift accidentally killed himself)]].

to:

* ArtisticLicenceLaw: The story climaxes in Parts 4 and 5 when [[spoiler:Phoenix and Twilight (initially) struggle to present evidence implicating a person ''other'' than Dash in the murder and thereby clearing her name]]. Though it ''could'' be explained away as a quirk of the Equestrian legal system, this violates a central tenet of RealLife criminal law, ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_dubio_pro_reo in dubio pro reo]]'' (When In Doubt, For The Accused). [[spoiler: At this point in the trial, the defence has already sucessfully successfully dismantled much of the evidence linking Dash to the alleged killing, whittling the prosecution's case down to circumstantial evidence such as Dash's possible motive as well as her presence near the crime scene - both of which make for a laughably flimsy case on their own merit and offer plenty of grounds for an acquittal. The burden of proving Dash's participation in Ace Swift's death ''beyond'' reasonable doubt - beginning with reliably establishing the causality of Dash's actions - rests squarely with prosecutor Trixie, and it's not on the defence to remove every last shred of suspicion]]. This principle ultimately turns out to be ''very'' well-advised when it is ultimately revealed that [[spoiler:Ace Swift accidentally killed himself)]].



* ArtShift: The explanation of the mechanics of teleportation is accompained by a small animated sequence done in the simplistic "pointy pony" style. This style returns without animation during the credit sections of the WhereAreTheyNowEpilogue.

to:

* ArtShift: The explanation of the mechanics of teleportation is accompained accompanied by a small animated sequence done in the simplistic "pointy pony" style. This style returns without animation during the credit sections of the WhereAreTheyNowEpilogue.

Changed: 32

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ArtisticLicenceLaw: The story climaxes in Parts 4 and 5 when [[spoiler:Phoenix and Twilight (initially) struggle to present evidence implicating a person ''other'' than Dash in the murder and thereby clearing her name]]. Though it ''could'' be explained away as a quirk of the Equestrian legal system, this violates a central tenet of RealLife criminal law, ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_dubio_pro_reo in dubio pro reo]]'' (When In Doubt, For The Accused). [[spoiler: At this point in the trial, the defence has already sucessfully dismantled much of the evidence linking Dash to the alleged killing, whittling the prosecution's case down to circumstantial evidence such as Dash's possible motive as well as her presence near the crime scene - both of which make for a laughably flimsy case on their own merit and offer plenty of grounds for an acquittal. The burden of proving Dash's participation in Ace Swift's death ''beyond'' reasonable doubt - beginning with reliably establishing the causality of Dash's actions - rests squarely with prosecutor Trixie, and it's not on the defence to remove every last shred of suspicion]]. This principle ultimately turns out to be ''very'' well-advised when [[spoiler: Ace Swift accidentally killed himself)]].

to:

* ArtisticLicenceLaw: The story climaxes in Parts 4 and 5 when [[spoiler:Phoenix and Twilight (initially) struggle to present evidence implicating a person ''other'' than Dash in the murder and thereby clearing her name]]. Though it ''could'' be explained away as a quirk of the Equestrian legal system, this violates a central tenet of RealLife criminal law, ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_dubio_pro_reo in dubio pro reo]]'' (When In Doubt, For The Accused). [[spoiler: At this point in the trial, the defence has already sucessfully dismantled much of the evidence linking Dash to the alleged killing, whittling the prosecution's case down to circumstantial evidence such as Dash's possible motive as well as her presence near the crime scene - both of which make for a laughably flimsy case on their own merit and offer plenty of grounds for an acquittal. The burden of proving Dash's participation in Ace Swift's death ''beyond'' reasonable doubt - beginning with reliably establishing the causality of Dash's actions - rests squarely with prosecutor Trixie, and it's not on the defence to remove every last shred of suspicion]]. This principle ultimately turns out to be ''very'' well-advised when [[spoiler: Ace it is ultimately revealed that [[spoiler:Ace Swift accidentally killed himself)]].

Changed: 204

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ArtisticLicenceLaw: The story climaxes in Parts 4 and 5 when [[spoiler:Phoenix and Twilight (initially) struggle to present evidence implicating a person ''other'' than Dash in the murder and thereby clearing her name]]. Though it ''could'' be explained away as a quirk of the Equestrian legal system, this violates a central tenet of RealLife criminal law, ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_dubio_pro_reo in dubio pro reo]]'' (When In Doubt, For The Accused). [[spoiler: At this point in the trial, the defence has already sucessfully dismantled much of the evidence linking Dash to the alleged killing, whittling the prosecution's case down to circumstantial evidence such as Dash's possible motive as well as her presence near the crime scene - both of which make for a laughably flimsy case on their own merit and offer plenty of grounds for an acquittal. The burden of proving Dash's participation in Ace Swift's death ''beyond'' reasonable doubt - beginning with reliably establishing the causality of Dash's actions - rests squarely with prosecutor Trixie, and it's not on the defence to remove every last shred of suspicion]]. This principle ultimately turns out to be ''very'' well-advised when [[spoiler: the death is ultimately revealed to have been caused by a case of ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Force_majeure force majeure]]'' (ie, not attributable to Rainbow Dash's - or any other pony's - fault)]].

to:

* ArtisticLicenceLaw: The story climaxes in Parts 4 and 5 when [[spoiler:Phoenix and Twilight (initially) struggle to present evidence implicating a person ''other'' than Dash in the murder and thereby clearing her name]]. Though it ''could'' be explained away as a quirk of the Equestrian legal system, this violates a central tenet of RealLife criminal law, ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_dubio_pro_reo in dubio pro reo]]'' (When In Doubt, For The Accused). [[spoiler: At this point in the trial, the defence has already sucessfully dismantled much of the evidence linking Dash to the alleged killing, whittling the prosecution's case down to circumstantial evidence such as Dash's possible motive as well as her presence near the crime scene - both of which make for a laughably flimsy case on their own merit and offer plenty of grounds for an acquittal. The burden of proving Dash's participation in Ace Swift's death ''beyond'' reasonable doubt - beginning with reliably establishing the causality of Dash's actions - rests squarely with prosecutor Trixie, and it's not on the defence to remove every last shred of suspicion]]. This principle ultimately turns out to be ''very'' well-advised when [[spoiler: the death is ultimately revealed to have been caused by a case of ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Force_majeure force majeure]]'' (ie, not attributable to Rainbow Dash's - or any other pony's - fault)]].Ace Swift accidentally killed himself)]].

Changed: 25

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ArtisticLicenceLaw: The story climaxes in Parts 4 and 5 when [[spoiler:Phoenix and Twilight (initially) struggle to present evidence implicating a person ''other'' than Dash in the murder and thereby clearing her name]]. Though it ''could'' be explained away as a quirk of the Equestrian legal system, this violates a central tenet of RealLife criminal law, ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_dubio_pro_reo in dubio pro reo]]'' (When In Doubt, For The Accused). [[spoiler: At this point in the trial, the defence has already sucessfully dismantled much of the evidence linking Dash to the alleged killing, whittling the prosecution's case down to circumstantial evidence such as Dash's possible motive as well as her presence near the crime scene - both of which make for a laughably flimsy case on their own and more than enough grounds for an acquittal. The burden of proving Dash's participation in Ace Swift's death ''beyond'' reasonable doubt - beginning with reliably establishing the causality of Dash's actions - rests squarely with prosecutor Trixie, and it's not on the defence to remove every last shred of suspicion]]. This principle ultimately turns out to be ''very'' well-advised when [[spoiler: the death is ultimately revealed to have been caused by a case of ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Force_majeure force majeure]]'' (ie, not attributable to Rainbow Dash's - or any other pony's - fault)]].

to:

* ArtisticLicenceLaw: The story climaxes in Parts 4 and 5 when [[spoiler:Phoenix and Twilight (initially) struggle to present evidence implicating a person ''other'' than Dash in the murder and thereby clearing her name]]. Though it ''could'' be explained away as a quirk of the Equestrian legal system, this violates a central tenet of RealLife criminal law, ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_dubio_pro_reo in dubio pro reo]]'' (When In Doubt, For The Accused). [[spoiler: At this point in the trial, the defence has already sucessfully dismantled much of the evidence linking Dash to the alleged killing, whittling the prosecution's case down to circumstantial evidence such as Dash's possible motive as well as her presence near the crime scene - both of which make for a laughably flimsy case on their own merit and more than enough offer plenty of grounds for an acquittal. The burden of proving Dash's participation in Ace Swift's death ''beyond'' reasonable doubt - beginning with reliably establishing the causality of Dash's actions - rests squarely with prosecutor Trixie, and it's not on the defence to remove every last shred of suspicion]]. This principle ultimately turns out to be ''very'' well-advised when [[spoiler: the death is ultimately revealed to have been caused by a case of ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Force_majeure force majeure]]'' (ie, not attributable to Rainbow Dash's - or any other pony's - fault)]].

Changed: 20

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ArtisticLicenceLaw: The story climaxes in Parts 4 and 5 when [[spoiler:Phoenix and Twilight (initially) struggle to present evidence implicating a person ''other'' than Dash in the murder and thereby clearing her name]]. Though it ''could'' be explained away as a quirk of the Equestrian legal system, this violates a central tenet of RealLife criminal law, ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_dubio_pro_reo in dubio pro reo]]'' (When In Doubt, For The Accused). [[spoiler: At this point in the trial, the defence has already sucessfully dismantled much of the evidence linking Dash to the alleged killing, whittling the prosecution's case down to circumstantial evidence such as Dash's possible motive as well as her presence near the crime scene - both of which make for a laughably flimsy case on their own and more than enough grounds for an acquittal. [[spoiler:The burden of proving Dash's participation in Ace Swift's death ''beyond'' reasonable doubt - beginning with reliably establishing the causality of Dash's actions - rests squarely with prosecutor Trixie - not on the defence to remove every last shred of suspicion]]. This principle ultimately turns out to be ''very'' well-advised when [[spoiler: the death is ultimately revealed to have been caused by a case of ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Force_majeure force majeure]]'' (ie, not attributable to Rainbow Dash's - or any other pony's - fault)]].

to:

* ArtisticLicenceLaw: The story climaxes in Parts 4 and 5 when [[spoiler:Phoenix and Twilight (initially) struggle to present evidence implicating a person ''other'' than Dash in the murder and thereby clearing her name]]. Though it ''could'' be explained away as a quirk of the Equestrian legal system, this violates a central tenet of RealLife criminal law, ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_dubio_pro_reo in dubio pro reo]]'' (When In Doubt, For The Accused). [[spoiler: At this point in the trial, the defence has already sucessfully dismantled much of the evidence linking Dash to the alleged killing, whittling the prosecution's case down to circumstantial evidence such as Dash's possible motive as well as her presence near the crime scene - both of which make for a laughably flimsy case on their own and more than enough grounds for an acquittal. [[spoiler:The The burden of proving Dash's participation in Ace Swift's death ''beyond'' reasonable doubt - beginning with reliably establishing the causality of Dash's actions - rests squarely with prosecutor Trixie - Trixie, and it's not on the defence to remove every last shred of suspicion]]. This principle ultimately turns out to be ''very'' well-advised when [[spoiler: the death is ultimately revealed to have been caused by a case of ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Force_majeure force majeure]]'' (ie, not attributable to Rainbow Dash's - or any other pony's - fault)]].

Changed: 174

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ArtisticLicenceLaw: Even though it could be explained away as a quirk of the Equestrian legal system, the story climaxes in Parts 4 and 5 when [[spoiler:Phoenix and Twilight (initially) struggle to present evidence implicating a person ''other'' than Dash in the murder and thereby clearing her name]]. This violates a central tenet of criminal law, ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_dubio_pro_reo in dubio pro reo]]'' (When In Doubt, For The Accused). [[spoiler: At this point in the trial, the defence has already sucessfully dismantled much of the evidence linking Dash to the alleged killing, whittling the prosecution's case down to circumstantial evidence such as Dash's possible motive as well as her presence near the crime scene - both of which make for a laughably flimsy case on their own and more than enough grounds for an acquittal. [[spoiler:The burden of proving Dash's participation in Ace Swift's death ''beyond'' reasonable doubt - beginning with reliably establishing the causality of Dash's actions - rests squarely with prosecutor Trixie - not on the defence to remove every last shred of suspicion]]. This principle ultimately turns out to be ''very'' well-advised when [[spoiler: the death is ultimately revealed to have been caused by a case of ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Force_majeure force majeure]]'' (ie, not attributable to Rainbow Dash's - or any other pony's - fault)]].

to:

* ArtisticLicenceLaw: Even though it could be explained away as a quirk of the Equestrian legal system, the The story climaxes in Parts 4 and 5 when [[spoiler:Phoenix and Twilight (initially) struggle to present evidence implicating a person ''other'' than Dash in the murder and thereby clearing her name]]. This Though it ''could'' be explained away as a quirk of the Equestrian legal system, this violates a central tenet of RealLife criminal law, ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_dubio_pro_reo in dubio pro reo]]'' (When In Doubt, For The Accused). [[spoiler: At this point in the trial, the defence has already sucessfully dismantled much of the evidence linking Dash to the alleged killing, whittling the prosecution's case down to circumstantial evidence such as Dash's possible motive as well as her presence near the crime scene - both of which make for a laughably flimsy case on their own and more than enough grounds for an acquittal. [[spoiler:The burden of proving Dash's participation in Ace Swift's death ''beyond'' reasonable doubt - beginning with reliably establishing the causality of Dash's actions - rests squarely with prosecutor Trixie - not on the defence to remove every last shred of suspicion]]. This principle ultimately turns out to be ''very'' well-advised when [[spoiler: the death is ultimately revealed to have been caused by a case of ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Force_majeure force majeure]]'' (ie, not attributable to Rainbow Dash's - or any other pony's - fault)]].

Changed: 106

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ArtisticLicenceLaw: Even though it could be explained away as a quirk of the Equestrian legal system, the story climaxes in Parts 4 and 5 when [[spoiler:Phoenix and Twilight (initially) struggle to present evidence implicating a person ''other'' than Dash in the murder and thereby clearing her name]]. This violates a central tenet of criminal law, ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_dubio_pro_reo in dubio pro reo]]'' (When In Doubt, For The Accused). [[spoiler: At this point in the trial, the defence has already sucessfully dismantled much of the prosecution's alleged evidence linking Dash to the crime, whittling the prosecution's case down to circumstantial evidence such as Dash's presence near the crime scene as well as a possible motive - both of which make for a laughably flimsy case on their own and more than enough grounds for an acquittal. [[spoiler:The burden to prove Dash's participation in Ace Swift's death ''beyond'' reasonable doubt - beginning with reliably establishing the causality of Dash's actions - rests squarely with prosecutor Trixie - not on the defence to remove every last shred of suspicion]]. This principle ultimately turns out to be ''very'' well-advised when [[spoiler: the death is ultimately revealed to have been caused by a case of ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Force_majeure force majeure]]'' (ie, not attributable to Rainbow Dash's - or any other pony's - fault)]].

to:

* ArtisticLicenceLaw: Even though it could be explained away as a quirk of the Equestrian legal system, the story climaxes in Parts 4 and 5 when [[spoiler:Phoenix and Twilight (initially) struggle to present evidence implicating a person ''other'' than Dash in the murder and thereby clearing her name]]. This violates a central tenet of criminal law, ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_dubio_pro_reo in dubio pro reo]]'' (When In Doubt, For The Accused). [[spoiler: At this point in the trial, the defence has already sucessfully dismantled much of the prosecution's alleged evidence linking Dash to the crime, alleged killing, whittling the prosecution's case down to circumstantial evidence such as Dash's possible motive as well as her presence near the crime scene as well as a possible motive - both of which make for a laughably flimsy case on their own and more than enough grounds for an acquittal. [[spoiler:The burden to prove of proving Dash's participation in Ace Swift's death ''beyond'' reasonable doubt - beginning with reliably establishing the causality of Dash's actions - rests squarely with prosecutor Trixie - not on the defence to remove every last shred of suspicion]]. This principle ultimately turns out to be ''very'' well-advised when [[spoiler: the death is ultimately revealed to have been caused by a case of ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Force_majeure force majeure]]'' (ie, not attributable to Rainbow Dash's - or any other pony's - fault)]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ArtisticLicenceLaw: Even though it could be explained away as a quirk of the Equestrian legal system, the story climaxes in Parts 4 and 5 when [[spoiler:Phoenix and Twilight (initially) struggle to present evidence implicating a person ''other'' than Dash in the murder and thereby clearing her name]]. This violates a central tenet of law, ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_dubio_pro_reo in dubio pro reo]]'' (When In Doubt, For The Accused). [[spoiler: At this point in the trial, the defence has already sucessfully dismantled much of the prosecution's alleged evidence linking Dash to the crime, whittling the prosecution's case down to circumstantial evidence such as Dash's presence near the crime scene as well as a possible motive - both of which make for a laughably flimsy case on their own and more than enough grounds for an acquittal. [[spoiler:The burden to prove Dash's participation in Ace Swift's death ''beyond'' reasonable doubt - beginning with reliably establishing the causality of Dash's actions - rests squarely with prosecutor Trixie - not on the defence to remove every last shred of suspicion]]. This principle ultimately turns out to be ''very'' well-advised when [[spoiler: the death is ultimately revealed to have been caused by a case of ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Force_majeure force majeure]]'' (ie, not attributable to Rainbow Dash's - or any other pony's - fault)]].

to:

* ArtisticLicenceLaw: Even though it could be explained away as a quirk of the Equestrian legal system, the story climaxes in Parts 4 and 5 when [[spoiler:Phoenix and Twilight (initially) struggle to present evidence implicating a person ''other'' than Dash in the murder and thereby clearing her name]]. This violates a central tenet of criminal law, ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_dubio_pro_reo in dubio pro reo]]'' (When In Doubt, For The Accused). [[spoiler: At this point in the trial, the defence has already sucessfully dismantled much of the prosecution's alleged evidence linking Dash to the crime, whittling the prosecution's case down to circumstantial evidence such as Dash's presence near the crime scene as well as a possible motive - both of which make for a laughably flimsy case on their own and more than enough grounds for an acquittal. [[spoiler:The burden to prove Dash's participation in Ace Swift's death ''beyond'' reasonable doubt - beginning with reliably establishing the causality of Dash's actions - rests squarely with prosecutor Trixie - not on the defence to remove every last shred of suspicion]]. This principle ultimately turns out to be ''very'' well-advised when [[spoiler: the death is ultimately revealed to have been caused by a case of ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Force_majeure force majeure]]'' (ie, not attributable to Rainbow Dash's - or any other pony's - fault)]].

Changed: 144

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ArtisticLicenceLaw: Even though it could be explained away as a quirk of the Equestrian legal system, the story climaxes in Parts 4 and 5 when [[spoiler:Phoenix and Twilight (initially) struggle to present evidence implicating a person ''other'' than Dash in the murder and thereby clearing her name]]. This violates a central tenet of law, ''in dubio pro reo'' (Doubt favours the accused). [[spoiler: At this point in the trial, the defence has already sucessfully dismantled much of the prosecution's alleged evidence linking Dash to the crime, whittling the prosecution's case down to circumstantial evidence such as Dash's presence near the crime scene as well as a possible motive - both of which make for a laughably flimsy case on their own and more than enough grounds for an acquittal. [[spoiler:The burden to prove Dash's participation in Ace Swift's death ''beyond'' reasonable doubt - beginning with realiably establishing the causality of action - rests squarely with prosecutor Trixie - not on the defence to remove every last shred of suspicion]]. This principle ultimately turns our to be well-advised when [[spoiler: the death ultimately revealed to have been caused by a case ''force majeure'' (ie, not attributable to Rainbow Dash's - or any other pony's - fault)]].

to:

* ArtisticLicenceLaw: Even though it could be explained away as a quirk of the Equestrian legal system, the story climaxes in Parts 4 and 5 when [[spoiler:Phoenix and Twilight (initially) struggle to present evidence implicating a person ''other'' than Dash in the murder and thereby clearing her name]]. This violates a central tenet of law, ''in ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_dubio_pro_reo in dubio pro reo'' (Doubt favours the accused).reo]]'' (When In Doubt, For The Accused). [[spoiler: At this point in the trial, the defence has already sucessfully dismantled much of the prosecution's alleged evidence linking Dash to the crime, whittling the prosecution's case down to circumstantial evidence such as Dash's presence near the crime scene as well as a possible motive - both of which make for a laughably flimsy case on their own and more than enough grounds for an acquittal. [[spoiler:The burden to prove Dash's participation in Ace Swift's death ''beyond'' reasonable doubt - beginning with realiably reliably establishing the causality of action Dash's actions - rests squarely with prosecutor Trixie - not on the defence to remove every last shred of suspicion]]. This principle ultimately turns our out to be ''very'' well-advised when [[spoiler: the death is ultimately revealed to have been caused by a case ''force majeure'' of ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Force_majeure force majeure]]'' (ie, not attributable to Rainbow Dash's - or any other pony's - fault)]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ArtisticLicenceLaw: Even though it could be explained away as a quirk of the Equestrian legal system, the story climaxes in Parts 4 and 5 when [[spoiler:Phoenix and Twilight (initially) struggle to present evidence implicating a person _other_ than Dash in the murder and thereby clearing her name]]. This violates a central tenet of law, ''in dubio pro reo'' (Doubt favours the accused). [[spoiler: At this point in the trial, the defence has already sucessfully dismantled much of the prosecution's alleged evidence linking Dash to the crime, whittling the prosecution's case down to circumstantial evidence such as Dash's presence near the crime scene as well as a possible motive - both of which make for a laughably flimsy case on their own and more than enough grounds for an acquittal. [[spoiler:The burden to prove Dash's participation in Ace Swift's death ''beyond'' reasonable doubt - beginning with realiably establishing the causality of action - rests squarely with prosecutor Trixie - not on the defence to remove every last shred of suspicion]]. This principle ultimately turns our to be well-advised when [[spoiler: the death ultimately revealed to have been caused by a case ''force majeure'' (ie, not attributable to Rainbow Dash's - or any other pony's - fault)]].

to:

* ArtisticLicenceLaw: Even though it could be explained away as a quirk of the Equestrian legal system, the story climaxes in Parts 4 and 5 when [[spoiler:Phoenix and Twilight (initially) struggle to present evidence implicating a person _other_ ''other'' than Dash in the murder and thereby clearing her name]]. This violates a central tenet of law, ''in dubio pro reo'' (Doubt favours the accused). [[spoiler: At this point in the trial, the defence has already sucessfully dismantled much of the prosecution's alleged evidence linking Dash to the crime, whittling the prosecution's case down to circumstantial evidence such as Dash's presence near the crime scene as well as a possible motive - both of which make for a laughably flimsy case on their own and more than enough grounds for an acquittal. [[spoiler:The burden to prove Dash's participation in Ace Swift's death ''beyond'' reasonable doubt - beginning with realiably establishing the causality of action - rests squarely with prosecutor Trixie - not on the defence to remove every last shred of suspicion]]. This principle ultimately turns our to be well-advised when [[spoiler: the death ultimately revealed to have been caused by a case ''force majeure'' (ie, not attributable to Rainbow Dash's - or any other pony's - fault)]].

Added: 1285

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ArtisticLicenceLaw: Even though it could be explained away as a quirk of the Equestrian legal system, the story climaxes in Parts 4 and 5 when [[spoiler:Phoenix and Twilight (initially) struggle to present evidence implicating a person _other_ than Dash in the murder and thereby clearing her name]]. This violates a central tenet of law, ''in dubio pro reo'' (Doubt favours the accused). [[spoiler: At this point in the trial, the defence has already sucessfully dismantled much of the prosecution's alleged evidence linking Dash to the crime, whittling the prosecution's case down to circumstantial evidence such as Dash's presence near the crime scene as well as a possible motive - both of which make for a laughably flimsy case on their own and more than enough grounds for an acquittal. [[spoiler:The burden to prove Dash's participation in Ace Swift's death ''beyond'' reasonable doubt - beginning with realiably establishing the causality of action - rests squarely with prosecutor Trixie - not on the defence to remove every last shred of suspicion]]. This principle ultimately turns our to be well-advised when [[spoiler: the death ultimately revealed to have been caused by a case ''force majeure'' (ie, not attributable to Rainbow Dash's - or any other pony's - fault)]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Big Mac's [[OOCIsSeriousBusiness monologue]] to Phoenix in the finale seems to be a TakeThat to overly-enthusiastic bronies who let their love of the show get the better of them when trying to get other people to try it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* BusmansHoliday: The Judge was on vacation when he was suddenly summoned to Equestria to preside over Rainbow Dash's trial. He doesn't mind because he's quite enamored with the the place, and [[IChooseToStay decides to spend the rest of his vacation there rather than leave with Phoenix as soon as the trial is over]].

Added: 855

Changed: 152

Removed: 366

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ChirpingCrickets: Even crickets know that Phoenix [[CriticalResearchFailure has seriously messed up]]:

to:

* ChirpingCrickets: Even crickets know that Phoenix [[CriticalResearchFailure [[InUniverseFactoidFailure has seriously messed up]]:



* CriticalResearchFailure: In-universe:
-->'''Phoenix''': What's her problem, Twilight? She can't honestly think [[PaintingTheFrostOnWindows someone can control weather]]. It's ludicrous!\\
'''Trixie''': You have to be the biggest imbecile Trixie has ever laid eyes on!\\
'''Judge''': Mr. Wright... that's a Pegasus's job here in Equestria. It's… sort of what they do.\\
'''Phoenix''': Mmmph... uh... what...?

to:

* CriticalResearchFailure: In-universe:
-->'''Phoenix''': What's her problem, Twilight? She can't honestly think [[PaintingTheFrostOnWindows someone can control weather]]. It's ludicrous!\\
'''Trixie''': You have to be the biggest imbecile Trixie has ever laid eyes on!\\
'''Judge''': Mr. Wright... that's a Pegasus's job here in Equestria. It's… sort
%% In-univererse examples of what they do.\\
'''Phoenix''': Mmmph... uh... what...?
Critical Research Failure go under In-Universe Factoid Failure.



* TheDayTheMusicLied: The first use of the triumphant ''Pursuit ~ Cornered'' is for a [[CriticalResearchFailure critically wrong]] outburst by Phoenix, and it dies just as quickly as it shows up.

to:

* TheDayTheMusicLied: The first use of the triumphant ''Pursuit ~ Cornered'' is for a [[CriticalResearchFailure [[InUniverseFactoidFailure critically wrong]] outburst by Phoenix, and it dies just as quickly as it shows up.


Added DiffLines:

* InUniverseFactoidFailure:
** [[Franchise/AceAttorney Phoenix Wright]] makes a loud objection during the trial when it's revealed that the decisive evidence against the defendant is a storm cloud, mocking the prosecution for suggesting that his client could move that cloud around and make it shoot lightning at will. Too bad he happens to be in [[WesternAnimation/MyLittlePonyFriendshipIsMagic Equestria]], a world where [[PaintingTheFrostOnWindows controlling the weather]] is a common sense fact.
--->'''Phoenix''': Oh... Hehe... Sorry! My mistake...\\
'''Twilight''': Maybe you should have... Oh, I don't know, ''studied''!?\\
'''Phoenix''': I said I was sorry!
** Shortly after he makes another mistake in trying to contradict a statement, pointing out that the thunder is heard after the lightning strike, not at the same time. Not in Equestria, though.
Tabs MOD

Removed: 462

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* WorldOfCardboardSpeech: A short but effective one delivered by Phoenix after getting a much needed lead in the case and a much needed realization regarding Sonata.
-->'''Phoenix''': I was given one more chance, one more chance to find the truth. It's either sink or swim. [[spoiler:Even if she tries to have me arrested for intrusion]]. I got her on the stand; it doesn't matter anymore. It's time she pays her dues for all she's done... Including the murder...
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Twilight mentions the last time she went into the "Everfree Forest" alone she got turned to [[Recap/MyLittlePonyFriendshipIsMagicS1E17StareMaster stone]]
Tabs MOD

Added: 236

Removed: 227

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* DiegeticSoundtrackUsage: Pinkie Pie hums ''Ace Attorney's'' iconic ''Pursuit ~ Cornered'' theme as they are entering Ace's room.
-->'''Phoenix:''' ''([[LeaningOnTheFourthWall That song she's humming sounds really, really familiar…]])''



* ThemeTuneCameo: Pinkie Pie hums ''Ace Attorney's'' iconic ''Pursuit ~ Cornered'' theme as they are entering Ace's room.
-->'''Phoenix:''' ''([[LeaningOnTheFourthWall That song she's humming sounds really, really familiar…]])''

Added: 294

Changed: 69

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* VengeanceFeelsEmpty: [[spoiler:Gilda's attempted revenge ended up causing this for her.]]

to:

* VengeanceFeelsEmpty: VengeanceFeelsEmpty:
**
[[spoiler:Gilda's attempted revenge ended up causing this for her.]]]]
** Conversely, the revenge-driven prosecutor Trixie defies this, claiming the opposite [[spoiler:after losing the case]]: that [[spoiler:the temporary guilty verdict against Rainbow Dash]] made her feel on top of the world.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


-->[[spoiler:''"It's amazing what one little mistake ended up costing me..."'']]

to:

-->[[spoiler:''"It's --->[[spoiler:''"It's amazing what one little mistake ended up costing me..."'']]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Zig-zagged a bit by Trixie. While she is angered by the resolution of the trial, the way Phoenix manages to figure out the actual truth behind the crime leaves her humbled. She admits she can't beat Phoenix's case and rests the prosecution. However, after the trial she is too angry to speak and smacks Phoenix on the head.

to:

** Zig-zagged a bit by Trixie. While she is angered by the resolution of the trial, the way Phoenix manages to figure out the actual truth behind the crime leaves her humbled. She admits she can't beat Phoenix's case and rests the prosecution. However, after the trial she is too angry to speak and smacks Phoenix on the head.

Changed: 151

Removed: 149

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Zig-zagged a bit by Trixie. While she is angered by the resolution of the trial, the way Phoenix manages to figure out the actual truth behind the crime leaves her humbled.
-->'''Judge:''' Do... you have any retort to this possibility Ms. Trixie?\\
'''Trixie:''' No... I don't... I can't beat that. The prosecution rests...

to:

** Zig-zagged a bit by Trixie. While she is angered by the resolution of the trial, the way Phoenix manages to figure out the actual truth behind the crime leaves her humbled.
-->'''Judge:''' Do... you have any retort to this possibility Ms. Trixie?\\
'''Trixie:''' No... I don't... I
humbled. She admits she can't beat that. The prosecution rests...Phoenix's case and rests the prosecution. However, after the trial she is too angry to speak and smacks Phoenix on the head.

Top