History WMG / TheTalesOfBeedleTheBard

3rd Jan '18 4:53:22 AM Joyce13
Is there an issue? Send a Message


[[WMG: The kind wizard in "The Wizard and His Hopping Pot" is based off of Linfred of Stitchcombe, the Potter family's patriarch.]]
According to the information on the Potter family shown on Pottermore, the family ancestor is Linfred of Stitchcombe, nicknamed "the Potterer" due to the fact he liked to potter around his garden, which later was shortened to "Potter". Linfred was a potioneer, creating several potions that became the basis for other potions like Pepper-Up and Skele-Gro, and was known to give out his cures to his Muggle neighbors. Beedle the Bard could have discovered what Linfred was doing and used him as the inspiration for the kind wizard helping out Muggle neighbors in "The Wizard and His Hopping Pot". Whether or not one or more of Linfred's seven children objected to helping out Muggle neighbors (like the way the wizard's son in the story did) is unknown.

to:

[[WMG: The kind wizard in "The Wizard and His the Hopping Pot" is based off of Linfred of Stitchcombe, the Potter family's patriarch.]]
According to the information on the Potter family shown on Pottermore, the family ancestor is Linfred of Stitchcombe, nicknamed "the Potterer" due to the fact he liked to potter around his garden, which later was shortened to "Potter". Linfred was a potioneer, creating several potions that became the basis for other potions like Pepper-Up and Skele-Gro, and was known to give out his cures to his Muggle neighbors. Beedle the Bard could have discovered what Linfred was doing and used him as the inspiration for the kind wizard helping out Muggle neighbors in "The Wizard and His the Hopping Pot". Whether or not one or more of Linfred's seven children objected to helping out Muggle neighbors (like the way the wizard's son in the story did) is unknown.
3rd Jan '18 3:56:00 AM Joyce13
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* The actors for the romantic couple actually were going out until an hour before the curtain rose, when the guy playing Sir Luckless broke up with the girl playing Amata because he was attracted to the actor who played the sick witch. Immediately after the Ashwinder exploded, the two girls attacked one another with spells and the whole thing just went downhill from there.

to:

* The actors for the romantic couple actually were going out until an hour before the curtain rose, when the guy playing Sir Luckless broke up with the girl playing Amata because he was attracted to the actor who played the sick witch. Immediately after the Ashwinder exploded, the two girls attacked one another with spells and the whole thing just went downhill from there.there.

[[WMG: The kind wizard in "The Wizard and His Hopping Pot" is based off of Linfred of Stitchcombe, the Potter family's patriarch.]]
According to the information on the Potter family shown on Pottermore, the family ancestor is Linfred of Stitchcombe, nicknamed "the Potterer" due to the fact he liked to potter around his garden, which later was shortened to "Potter". Linfred was a potioneer, creating several potions that became the basis for other potions like Pepper-Up and Skele-Gro, and was known to give out his cures to his Muggle neighbors. Beedle the Bard could have discovered what Linfred was doing and used him as the inspiration for the kind wizard helping out Muggle neighbors in "The Wizard and His Hopping Pot". Whether or not one or more of Linfred's seven children objected to helping out Muggle neighbors (like the way the wizard's son in the story did) is unknown.
16th May '17 10:06:50 AM nombretomado
Is there an issue? Send a Message


** Let's just say that the core is [[TsubasaReservoirChronicle Sakura's feather.]] ...Hey, somebody had to say it.

to:

** Let's just say that the core is [[TsubasaReservoirChronicle [[Manga/TsubasaReservoirChronicle Sakura's feather.]] ...Hey, somebody had to say it.
6th Mar '17 6:33:01 AM Milarqui
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* Um... no. Just, no. You are grasping at straws to try to make your theory hold together, but all you do is spend time uselessly trying to convince others of something that is clearly shown to be incorrect. As explained above, Snape never intended to defeat Dumbledore - he was just planning to give him a MercyKill. It is Malfoy who defeats Dumbledore by disarming him. It is Harry that then defeats Malfoy by disarming him. It is Harry's ownership of the Elder Wand that allows him to defeat Voldemort, since the Wand will not attack its master. And, of course, you choose not to explain how your pet theory fits with the part where Harry does not die to Voldemort's Avada Kedavra, instead only destroying the Horcrux in Harry's head. And the reason why Nagini's death helps Harry? Simple, Voldemort feels the death of the snake and knows he has lost his last anchor - and that weakens him.

to:

* Um... no. Just, no. You are grasping at straws to try to make your theory hold together, but all you do is spend time uselessly trying to convince others of something that is clearly shown to be incorrect. As explained above, Snape never intended to defeat Dumbledore - he was just planning to give him a MercyKill. It is Malfoy who defeats Dumbledore by disarming him. It is Harry that then defeats Malfoy by disarming him. It is Harry's ownership of the Elder Wand that allows him to defeat Voldemort, since the Wand will not attack its master. And it is Voldemort that defeats Snape in the movies, by using ''Sectumsempra''. And, of course, you choose not to explain how your pet theory fits with the part where Harry does not die to Voldemort's Avada Kedavra, instead only destroying the Horcrux in Harry's head. And the reason why Nagini's death helps Harry? Simple, Voldemort feels the death of the snake and knows he has lost his last anchor - and that weakens him.
6th Mar '17 6:29:14 AM Milarqui
Is there an issue? Send a Message



to:

* Um... no. Just, no. You are grasping at straws to try to make your theory hold together, but all you do is spend time uselessly trying to convince others of something that is clearly shown to be incorrect. As explained above, Snape never intended to defeat Dumbledore - he was just planning to give him a MercyKill. It is Malfoy who defeats Dumbledore by disarming him. It is Harry that then defeats Malfoy by disarming him. It is Harry's ownership of the Elder Wand that allows him to defeat Voldemort, since the Wand will not attack its master. And, of course, you choose not to explain how your pet theory fits with the part where Harry does not die to Voldemort's Avada Kedavra, instead only destroying the Horcrux in Harry's head. And the reason why Nagini's death helps Harry? Simple, Voldemort feels the death of the snake and knows he has lost his last anchor - and that weakens him.
22nd Nov '16 9:38:25 PM NOYB
Is there an issue? Send a Message



to:

*** A Horcrux's (in)vulnerabilities don't change whether the owner has a body or not, hence the Basilisk venom being necessary to destroy the diary while Voldemort was still incorporeal somewhere. But yes, the wand was only broken in the film.
27th Oct '16 11:19:30 AM dlchen145
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* Um... The book very clearly explained how the Elder Wand changes masters. At least, it was pretty clear to me. In case it wasn't, here it is: In order for the Elder Wand to recognize a new master, its current master must be defeated, but "defeated" does ''not'' mean "killed". It could mean something as simple as Disarming, as [[spoiler: Harry]] did to the real master of the Elder Wand as of the end of ''[[Literature/HarryPotterAndTheHalfBloodPrince Half-Blood Prince]]'', [[spoiler: Draco Malfoy]] (also: the master doesn't have to be using the Elder Wand for it to be defeated). So there's the first link in the progression broken: Snape was never the master of the Elder Wand, because [[spoiler: he killed Dumbledore as per a prior agreement; Dumbledore more or less forfeited his mastery of the wand to Draco]]. The second link in the chain has a very low probability of being able to mutter an incantation (she'd have to hold the wand in her mouth, and proper word choice and pronunciation is kind of a big deal in the Potterverse), and she never defeated any of the wand's true masters. Neville, while [[TookALevelInBadass taking a level in badass]], ''also'' never defeated any of the wand's masters, but hey, come on. He ended up being master of a big fucking sword that can only be mastered by a true Gryffindor; he's no less {{badass}} for not being a master of the Elder Wand (which, as [[spoiler: Harry]] pointed out later, is a lot more hassle than most people want to deal with).

to:

* Um... The book very clearly explained how the Elder Wand changes masters. At least, it was pretty clear to me. In case it wasn't, here it is: In order for the Elder Wand to recognize a new master, its current master must be defeated, but "defeated" does ''not'' mean "killed". It could mean something as simple as Disarming, as [[spoiler: Harry]] did to the real master of the Elder Wand as of the end of ''[[Literature/HarryPotterAndTheHalfBloodPrince Half-Blood Prince]]'', [[spoiler: Draco Malfoy]] (also: the master doesn't have to be using the Elder Wand for it to be defeated). So there's the first link in the progression broken: Snape was never the master of the Elder Wand, because [[spoiler: he killed Dumbledore as per a prior agreement; Dumbledore more or less forfeited his mastery of the wand to Draco]]. The second link in the chain has a very low probability of being able to mutter an incantation (she'd have to hold the wand in her mouth, and proper word choice and pronunciation is kind of a big deal in the Potterverse), and she never defeated any of the wand's true masters. Neville, while [[TookALevelInBadass taking a level in badass]], ''also'' never defeated any of the wand's masters, but hey, come on. He ended up being master of a big fucking sword that can only be mastered by a true Gryffindor; he's no less {{badass}} badass for not being a master of the Elder Wand (which, as [[spoiler: Harry]] pointed out later, is a lot more hassle than most people want to deal with).
2nd Oct '16 1:24:30 PM nombretomado
Is there an issue? Send a Message


[[WMG:Death, from the Tale of the Three Brothers, is Der Tod from {{Elisabeth}}.]]

to:

[[WMG:Death, from the Tale of the Three Brothers, is Der Tod from {{Elisabeth}}.''Theatre/{{Elisabeth}}''.]]
1st Oct '16 11:31:37 AM Morgenthaler
Is there an issue? Send a Message


[[WMG: Sirius isn't dead, but would be better off if he was. (He may also be [[TheGrimReaper Death...]] or [[IrregularWebcomic ''a'' Death.)]]]]

to:

[[WMG: Sirius isn't dead, but would be better off if he was. (He may also be [[TheGrimReaper Death...]] or [[IrregularWebcomic [[Webcomic/IrregularWebcomic ''a'' Death.)]]]]
2nd Aug '16 7:10:06 AM rubeusremus
Is there an issue? Send a Message


[[WMG: Albus, Aberforth and Ariana represent the Three Brothers, and Grindelwald is Death]]

to:

[[WMG: Albus, Aberforth and Ariana represent the Three Brothers, and Grindelwald is Death]]Death.]]
This list shows the last 10 events of 75. Show all.
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/article_history.php?article=WMG.TheTalesOfBeedleTheBard