Follow TV Tropes

Following

History UsefulNotes / WeimarRepublic

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Ironically Friedrich Ebert, the chief founder and first president of the Weimar Republic, had not wanted to establish a republic at all. Though a social democrat, he was also a monarchist and wanted to keep the Hohenzollerns (albeit reduced to figurehead status as in Britain); the declaration of the republic was only a desperate move by a member of his cabinet to stop the communists declaring one instead. Technically, it failed in that - the communists declared a Soviet Republic a few hours later. Very few people cared about the second declaration. After that there was no going back, even if the monarchists wished so.

Structurally, the Republic wasn't actually terribly different from the Hohenzollern Empire. Rather than an Emperor, there was a directly-elected ''[[UsefulNotes/ThePresidentsOfGermany Reichspräsident]]'' (Reich President), who on account of his level of power was called (only half-jokingly) the ''[[CaptainErsatz Ersatzkaiser]]'' ("Fake/Replacement Emperor"). Other than that, there were only a few other changes, the requirement that the Chancellor have the support of the Reichstag and the extensive emergency powers of the President (Article 48) being the most important. Their new constitution was supposed to be the Best Constitution Ever, thus uniting the best things (considered) from the constitutions of the most successful western democracies: A strong president as in the US of A, a strong parliament as in the (Third) French republic, and direct democracy / plesbiscites as in Switzerland. [[GoldenMeanFallacy All of these backfired spectacularly]]: The strength of the president became a problem when a half-senile, easily influenced Hindenburg had almost-dictatorial powers; the strong parliament, which could kick out every government they didn't like, made governing first difficult and finally impossible, when the Nazis and the Commies got more than 50% of the votes; and the plebiscites were welcome opportunities for agitators from both left and right to spread their propaganda.

to:

Ironically Friedrich Ebert, the chief founder and first president of the Weimar Republic, had not wanted to establish a republic at all. Though a social democrat, he was also a monarchist and wanted to keep the Hohenzollerns (albeit reduced to figurehead status as in Britain); the declaration of the republic was only a desperate move by a member of his cabinet to stop the communists declaring one instead. Technically, it failed in that - the communists declared a Soviet Republic a few hours later. Very few people cared about the second declaration. After that there was no going back, even if the monarchists wished so.

to.

Structurally, the Republic wasn't actually terribly different from the Hohenzollern Empire. Rather than an Emperor, there was a directly-elected ''[[UsefulNotes/ThePresidentsOfGermany Reichspräsident]]'' (Reich President), who on account of his level of power was called (only half-jokingly) the ''[[CaptainErsatz Ersatzkaiser]]'' ("Fake/Replacement Emperor"). Other than that, there were only a few other changes, the requirement that the Chancellor have the support of the Reichstag and the extensive emergency powers of the President (Article 48) being the most important. Their new constitution was supposed to be the Best Constitution Ever, thus uniting the best things (considered) from the constitutions of the most successful western democracies: A strong president as in the US of A, a strong parliament as in the (Third) French republic, and direct democracy / plesbiscites plebiscites as in Switzerland. [[GoldenMeanFallacy All of these backfired spectacularly]]: The strength of the president became a problem when a half-senile, easily influenced Hindenburg had almost-dictatorial powers; the strong parliament, which could kick out every government they didn't like, made governing first difficult and finally impossible, when the Nazis and the Commies got more than 50% of the votes; and the plebiscites were welcome opportunities for agitators from both left and right to spread their propaganda.



Economically, though... well, the Mark suffered from RidiculousExchangeRates, thousands of people lost any money that wasn't saved as gold or silver, and when things looked as if they had somewhat stabilized, the economical crisis of 1929 struck. Germany became so ruined that people didn't even hesitate to give their vote for UsefulNotes/AdolfHitler after he promised them economic prosperity. The Nazis beating up their opponents also contributed, though the violence was entirely mutual.

In fact, in the ''Language of the Third Reich'' one of the characters, an old Jewish doctor, mentions that it was possible to see who won the last street brawl just by the injuries alone: if there were mostly crushed skulls and blunt trauma from beer bottles, chair legs or just plain old clubs -- that was the Communists beating Nazis, and if the wounds were mostly by the knife -- then vice versa, such was the political climate of the time.

to:

Economically, though... well, the Mark suffered from RidiculousExchangeRates, thousands of people lost any money that wasn't saved as gold or silver, and when things looked as if they had somewhat stabilized, the economical economic crisis of 1929 struck. Germany became so ruined that people didn't even hesitate to give their vote for to UsefulNotes/AdolfHitler after he promised them economic prosperity. The Nazis beating up their opponents also contributed, though the violence was entirely mutual.

In fact, in the ''Language of the Third Reich'' one of the characters, an old Jewish doctor, mentions that it was possible to see who won the last street brawl just by the injuries alone: if there were mostly crushed skulls and blunt trauma from beer bottles, chair legs or just plain old clubs -- clubs, that was the Communists beating Nazis, and if the wounds were mostly by the knife -- then vice versa, such was the political climate of the time.



The question of whether the Nazis were "voted into power" or seized it sometimes comes up. On the one hand, it's true that the Nazi party never won an absolute majority of votes -- in the March 1933 election with Hitler already chancellor, the National Socialist party gained 43.9% of the vote. [[note]]Even ''with'' voter intimidation and persecution of leftists.[[/note]] While this may seem extraordinary, it only seems so to countries with a two-party system (like the US). Many countries in the world have multiple parties in their governments, requiring parties to make alliances to govern effectively. In such a system a party receiving 44% of the vote is a big win. Even though the Nazis "only" held 44% of the vote, its opponents were fractured into so many little parties they didn't matter. Furthermore, the third-largest party were the communists. Either way, democracy had been given a thumbs down by a majority of Germans.

Historians' perceptions of the Weimar Republic differ. Marxist historians present it as an example of capitalism in crisis, arguing that the rise of the far-right and later the Nazis was orchestrated and abetted by business interests to preserve their power. Others, like William L. Shirer, present it as being doomed from the start, and that its later history was simply a failed state stumbling from crisis to crisis until its inevitable final collapse. Still more, like Ian Kershaw, adopt a more moderate approach, pointing out that at no point was the rise of Hitler and the end of the republic inevitable; on the contrary, the Republic gained strength during the boom years, and, even after the crisis of the Great Depression: the electoral support of the anti-democratic forces of Nazism and Communism was actually falling and the Nazi party almost bankrupt by the time Franz von Papen made his fateful decision to invite the Nazis into the cabinet in 1933.

to:

The question of whether the Nazis were "voted into power" or seized it sometimes comes up. On the one hand, it's true that the Nazi party never won an absolute majority of votes -- in the March 1933 election with Hitler already chancellor, the National Socialist party gained 43.9% of the vote. [[note]]Even ''with'' voter intimidation and persecution of leftists.[[/note]] While this may seem extraordinary, it only seems so to countries with a two-party system (like the US). Many countries in the world have multiple parties in their governments, requiring parties to make alliances to govern effectively. In such a system a party receiving 44% of the vote is a big win. Even though the Nazis "only" held 44% of the vote, its opponents were fractured into so many little parties they didn't matter. Furthermore, the third-largest party were the communists. Either way, democracy had been given a thumbs down by a majority of Germans.

Historians' perceptions of the Weimar Republic differ. Marxist historians present it as an example of capitalism in crisis, arguing that the rise of the far-right and later the Nazis was orchestrated and abetted by business interests to preserve their power. Others, like William L. Shirer, present it as being doomed from the start, and that its later history was simply a failed state stumbling from crisis to crisis until its inevitable final collapse. Still more, like Ian Kershaw, adopt a more moderate approach, pointing out that at no point was the rise of Hitler and the end of the republic inevitable; on the contrary, the Republic gained strength during the boom years, and, even after the crisis of the Great Depression: Depression the electoral support of the anti-democratic forces of Nazism and Communism was actually falling and the Nazi party Party almost bankrupt by the time Franz von Papen made his fateful decision to invite the Nazis into the cabinet in 1933.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


If you're ever on ''{{QI}}'' and StephenFry asks you what Germany was called in 1930 (he hasn't done it yet, but it's bound to come up at some point), don't say "The Weimar Republic". That name is an invention of historians and was not used at the time (like TheBonnRepublic). The correct term is "Deutsches Reich" (German Empire).

to:

If you're ever on ''{{QI}}'' and StephenFry asks you what Germany was called in 1930 (he hasn't done it yet, but it's bound to come up at some point), don't say "The Weimar Republic". That name is an invention of historians and was not used at the time (like TheBonnRepublic).[[UsefulNotes/ByzantineEmpire 'The Byzantine Empire']] or 'TheBonnRepublic'). The correct term is "Deutsches Reich" (German Empire).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Near the end, the Republic was in chaos. No party could gain a majority, and they all hated each other so much that forming a coalition was impossible. At the very first meeting of the Reichstag of 1932, the first and only thing it did was dissolve itself and call for new elections. In 1933 there still wasn't a majority and the German government was desperate, feeling that if they didn't act there'd be a civil war. The Nazis at this time, while without a majority, were the largest party. Faced with either working with them, declaring a national emergency or [[RedScare facing Communists upheaval]], President Hindenburg invited Hitler and his Nazis into the government. They hoped they would be able to control them. [[ForegoneConclusion They couldn't.]]

to:

Near the end, the Republic was in chaos. No party could gain a majority, and they all hated each other so much that forming a coalition was impossible. At the very first meeting of the Reichstag of 1932, the first and only thing it did was dissolve itself and call for new elections. In 1933 there still wasn't a majority and the German government was desperate, feeling that if they didn't act there'd be a civil war. The Nazis at this time, while without a majority, were the largest party. Faced with either working with them, declaring a national emergency or [[RedScare facing Communists Communist upheaval]], President Hindenburg invited Hitler and his Nazis into the government. They hoped they would be able to control them. [[ForegoneConclusion They couldn't.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Near the end, the Republic was in chaos. No party could gain a majority, and they all hated each other so much that forming a coalition was impossible. At the very first meeting of the Reichstag of 1932, the first and only thing it did was dissolve itself and call for new elections. In 1933 there still wasn't a majority and the German government was desperate, feeling that if they didn't act there'd be a civil war. The Nazis at this time, while without a majority, were the largest party. Faced with either working with them or declaring a national emergency, President Hindenburg invited Hitler and his Nazis into the government. They hoped they would be able to control them. [[ForegoneConclusion They couldn't.]]

to:

Near the end, the Republic was in chaos. No party could gain a majority, and they all hated each other so much that forming a coalition was impossible. At the very first meeting of the Reichstag of 1932, the first and only thing it did was dissolve itself and call for new elections. In 1933 there still wasn't a majority and the German government was desperate, feeling that if they didn't act there'd be a civil war. The Nazis at this time, while without a majority, were the largest party. Faced with either working with them or them, declaring a national emergency, emergency or [[RedScare facing Communists upheaval]], President Hindenburg invited Hitler and his Nazis into the government. They hoped they would be able to control them. [[ForegoneConclusion They couldn't.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The first few years (and for that matter the last few years) of the Weimar Republic was a time of enormous political instability. Between 1918 and 1923 there was an attempted coup by either the far right or the far left every year, as well as almost 500 political assassinations, most of which went unpunished by the toothless democracy. The last one in 1923, the Munich Beer Putsch, was actually led by UsefulNotes/AdolfHitler. He got a year in jail and wrote ''Mein Kampf''.

to:

The first few years (and for that matter the last few years) of the Weimar Republic was a time of enormous political instability. Between 1918 and 1923 there was an attempted coup by either the far right or the far left every year, as well as almost 500 political assassinations, most of which went unpunished by the toothless democracy. The last one in 1923, the Munich Beer Putsch, was actually led by UsefulNotes/AdolfHitler. He got less than half a year in jail and wrote ''Mein Kampf''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* A few strips in ''AxisPowersHetalia'' show Germany towards the tail end of the Republic, growing more than peeved at having to put up with the Treaty of Versailles.

to:

* A few strips in ''AxisPowersHetalia'' ''Webcomic/AxisPowersHetalia'' show Germany towards the tail end of the Republic, growing more than peeved at having to put up with the Treaty of Versailles.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The part of ''Anime/FullmetalAlchemist: [[TheMovie Conqueror of Shamballa]]'' which takes place in our world is mostly in this era; in fact, the Munich Beer Putsch occurs on-screen during the events of the film.

to:

* The part of ''Anime/FullmetalAlchemist: [[TheMovie Conqueror of Shamballa]]'' ''Anime/FullmetalAlchemistTheConquerorOfShamballa'' which takes place in our world is mostly in this era; in fact, the Munich Beer Putsch occurs on-screen during the events of the film.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Weimar (so called because that's where the constitution was written - Berlin remained the capital [[note]]but when the constitution was made, there was too much unrest there (again), so the delegates, fearing for their lives, moved to the much-quieter city of Weimar[[/note]]) was the government that ran Germany from the end of WorldWarOne until ThoseWackyNazis gained power.

to:

Weimar (so called because that's where the constitution was written - Berlin remained the capital [[note]]but when the constitution was made, there was too much unrest there (again), so the delegates, fearing for their lives, moved to the much-quieter city of Weimar[[/note]]) was the government that ran Germany from the end of WorldWarOne UsefulNotes/WorldWarOne until ThoseWackyNazis gained power.



Culturally, the Weimar Republic was very productive. Most notably, it contained the Cabaret culture (which produced Creator/MarleneDietrich), [[{{Dada}} Dadaism]], Bauhaus architecture, German Expressionism and director Creator/FritzLang, who probably created the RobotGirl trope (and others) in ''Film/{{Metropolis}}''. Even Creator/AlfredHitchcock made some British-German coproductions during this time. Then there were [[DichterAndDenker lots and lots of famous writers and intellectuals]]: Creator/BertoltBrecht, Kurt Tucholsky, Erich Maria Remarque, Erich Kästner, brothers Thomas and Heinrich Mann, Elias Canetti, Lion Feuchtwanger, Ödön von Horváth, Robert Musil, and so on.

to:

Culturally, the Weimar Republic was very productive. Most notably, it contained the Cabaret culture (which produced Creator/MarleneDietrich), [[{{Dada}} Dadaism]], UsefulNotes/{{Dada}}ism, Bauhaus architecture, German Expressionism and director Creator/FritzLang, who probably created the RobotGirl trope (and others) in ''Film/{{Metropolis}}''. Even Creator/AlfredHitchcock made some British-German coproductions during this time. Then there were [[DichterAndDenker lots and lots of famous writers and intellectuals]]: Creator/BertoltBrecht, Kurt Tucholsky, Erich Maria Remarque, Erich Kästner, brothers Thomas and Heinrich Mann, Elias Canetti, Lion Feuchtwanger, Ödön von Horváth, Robert Musil, and so on.



* ''Literature/TheTinDrum'' is partially set in this era, though it also covers WorldWarTwo and the [[WestGermany aftermath]].

to:

* ''Literature/TheTinDrum'' is partially set in this era, though it also covers WorldWarTwo UsefulNotes/WorldWarTwo and the [[WestGermany [[UsefulNotes/WestGermany aftermath]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
capitol -> capital


Weimar (so called because that's where the constitution was written - Berlin remained the capitol [[note]]but when the constitution was made, there was too much unrest there (again), so the delegates, fearing for their lives, moved to the much-quieter city of Weimar[[/note]]) was the government that ran Germany from the end of WorldWarOne until ThoseWackyNazis gained power.

to:

Weimar (so called because that's where the constitution was written - Berlin remained the capitol capital [[note]]but when the constitution was made, there was too much unrest there (again), so the delegates, fearing for their lives, moved to the much-quieter city of Weimar[[/note]]) was the government that ran Germany from the end of WorldWarOne until ThoseWackyNazis gained power.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
comma


Ironically Friedrich Ebert, the chief founder and first president of the Weimar Republic had not wanted to establish a republic at all. Though a social democrat, he was also a monarchist and wanted to keep the Hohenzollerns (albeit reduced to figurehead status as in Britain); the declaration of the republic was only a desperate move by a member of his cabinet to stop the communists declaring one instead. Technically, it failed in that - the communists declared a Soviet Republic a few hours later. Very few people cared about the second declaration. After that there was no going back, even if the monarchists wished so.

to:

Ironically Friedrich Ebert, the chief founder and first president of the Weimar Republic Republic, had not wanted to establish a republic at all. Though a social democrat, he was also a monarchist and wanted to keep the Hohenzollerns (albeit reduced to figurehead status as in Britain); the declaration of the republic was only a desperate move by a member of his cabinet to stop the communists declaring one instead. Technically, it failed in that - the communists declared a Soviet Republic a few hours later. Very few people cared about the second declaration. After that there was no going back, even if the monarchists wished so.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Near the end, the Republic was in chaos. No party could gain a majority, and they all hated each other so much that forming a coalition was impossible. At the very first meeting of the Reichstag in 1932, the first and only thing it did was dissolve itself and call for new elections. In 1933 there still wasn't a majority and the German government was desperate, feeling that if they didn't act there'd be a civil war. The Nazis at this time, while without a majority, were the largest party. Faced with either working with them or declaring a national emergency, President Hindenburg invited Hitler and his Nazis into the government. They hoped they would be able to control them. [[ForegoneConclusion They couldn't.]]

to:

Near the end, the Republic was in chaos. No party could gain a majority, and they all hated each other so much that forming a coalition was impossible. At the very first meeting of the Reichstag in of 1932, the first and only thing it did was dissolve itself and call for new elections. In 1933 there still wasn't a majority and the German government was desperate, feeling that if they didn't act there'd be a civil war. The Nazis at this time, while without a majority, were the largest party. Faced with either working with them or declaring a national emergency, President Hindenburg invited Hitler and his Nazis into the government. They hoped they would be able to control them. [[ForegoneConclusion They couldn't.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The question of whether the Nazis were "voted into power" or seized it sometimes comes up. On the one hand, it's true that the Nazi party never won an absolute majority of votes -- in the March 1933 election with Hitler already chancellor, the National Socialist party gained 43.9% of the vote. [[note]]Even ''with'' voter intimidation and persecution of leftists.[[/note]] While this may seem extraordinary, it only seems so to countries with a two-party system (like the US). Many countries in the world have multiple parties in their governments, requiring parties to make alliances to govern effectively. In such a system a party receiving 44% of the vote is a big win. Even though the Nazis "only" held 44% of the vote, its opponents were fractured into so many little parties they didn't matter. While later the Nazis certainly capitalized on popular support to seize ''complete'' power, it would be incorrect to state that popular support didn't exist. [[note]]After all, the German people never threw the Nazis out throughout the entire war.[[/note]]

to:

The question of whether the Nazis were "voted into power" or seized it sometimes comes up. On the one hand, it's true that the Nazi party never won an absolute majority of votes -- in the March 1933 election with Hitler already chancellor, the National Socialist party gained 43.9% of the vote. [[note]]Even ''with'' voter intimidation and persecution of leftists.[[/note]] While this may seem extraordinary, it only seems so to countries with a two-party system (like the US). Many countries in the world have multiple parties in their governments, requiring parties to make alliances to govern effectively. In such a system a party receiving 44% of the vote is a big win. Even though the Nazis "only" held 44% of the vote, its opponents were fractured into so many little parties they didn't matter. While later Furthermore, the Nazis certainly capitalized on popular support to seize ''complete'' power, it would be incorrect to state that popular support didn't exist. [[note]]After all, third-largest party were the German people never threw the Nazis out throughout the entire war.[[/note]]
communists. Either way, democracy had been given a thumbs down by a majority of Germans.

Added: 69

Changed: 20

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Film/TheLastLaugh''




to:

* ''Film/{{Spies}}''
* ''Film/TheWildcat''
* ''Film/WomanInTheMoon''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The question of whether the Nazis were "voted into power" or seized it sometimes comes up. On the one hand, it's true that the Nazi party never won an absolute majority of votes -- in the March 1933 election with Hitler already chancellor, the National Socialist party gained 43.9% of the vote [[note]]Even ''with'' voter intimidation and persecution of leftists[[/note]]. While this may seem extraordinary, it only seems so to countries with a two-party system (like the US). Many countries in the world have multiple parties in their governments, requiring parties to make alliances to govern effectively. In such a system a party receiving 44% of the vote is a big win. Even though the Nazis "only" held 44% of the vote, its opponents were fractured into so many little parties they didn't matter. While later the Nazis certainly capitalized on popular support to seize ''complete'' power, it would be incorrect to state that popular support didn't exist. [[note]]After all, the German people never threw the Nazis out throughout the entire war.[[/note]]

to:

The question of whether the Nazis were "voted into power" or seized it sometimes comes up. On the one hand, it's true that the Nazi party never won an absolute majority of votes -- in the March 1933 election with Hitler already chancellor, the National Socialist party gained 43.9% of the vote vote. [[note]]Even ''with'' voter intimidation and persecution of leftists[[/note]]. leftists.[[/note]] While this may seem extraordinary, it only seems so to countries with a two-party system (like the US). Many countries in the world have multiple parties in their governments, requiring parties to make alliances to govern effectively. In such a system a party receiving 44% of the vote is a big win. Even though the Nazis "only" held 44% of the vote, its opponents were fractured into so many little parties they didn't matter. While later the Nazis certainly capitalized on popular support to seize ''complete'' power, it would be incorrect to state that popular support didn't exist. [[note]]After all, the German people never threw the Nazis out throughout the entire war.[[/note]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The question of whether the Nazis were "voted into power" or seized it sometimes comes up. On the one hand, it's true that the Nazi party never won an absolute majority of votes -- in the March 1933 election with Hitler already chancellor, the National Socialist party gained 43.9% of the vote[[note]]Even ''with'' voter intimidation and persecution of leftists[[/note]]. While this may seem extraordinary, it only seems so to countries with a two-party system (like the US). Many countries in the world have multiple parties in their governments, requiring parties to make alliances to govern effectively. In such a system a party receiving 44% of the vote is a big win. Even though the Nazis "only" held 44% of the vote, its opponents were fractured into so many little parties they didn't matter. While later the Nazis certainly capitalized on popular support to seize ''complete'' power, it would be incorrect to state that popular support didn't exist. [[note]]After all, the German people never threw the Nazis out throughout the entire war.[[/note]]

to:

The question of whether the Nazis were "voted into power" or seized it sometimes comes up. On the one hand, it's true that the Nazi party never won an absolute majority of votes -- in the March 1933 election with Hitler already chancellor, the National Socialist party gained 43.9% of the vote[[note]]Even vote [[note]]Even ''with'' voter intimidation and persecution of leftists[[/note]]. While this may seem extraordinary, it only seems so to countries with a two-party system (like the US). Many countries in the world have multiple parties in their governments, requiring parties to make alliances to govern effectively. In such a system a party receiving 44% of the vote is a big win. Even though the Nazis "only" held 44% of the vote, its opponents were fractured into so many little parties they didn't matter. While later the Nazis certainly capitalized on popular support to seize ''complete'' power, it would be incorrect to state that popular support didn't exist. [[note]]After all, the German people never threw the Nazis out throughout the entire war.[[/note]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Near the end, the Republic was in chaos. No party could gain a majority, and they all hated each other so much that forming a coalition was impossible. At the very first meeting of the Reichstag in 1932, the first and only thing it did was dissolve itself and call for new elections. In 1933 there still wasn't a majority and the German government was desperate, feeling that if they didn't act there'd be a civil war. The Nazis at this time, while without a majority, were the largest party. Faced with either working with them or declaring a national emergency, President Hindenburg invited Hitler and his Nazis into the government. They hoped they would be able to control them. [[ForgoneConclusion They couldn't.]]

to:

Near the end, the Republic was in chaos. No party could gain a majority, and they all hated each other so much that forming a coalition was impossible. At the very first meeting of the Reichstag in 1932, the first and only thing it did was dissolve itself and call for new elections. In 1933 there still wasn't a majority and the German government was desperate, feeling that if they didn't act there'd be a civil war. The Nazis at this time, while without a majority, were the largest party. Faced with either working with them or declaring a national emergency, President Hindenburg invited Hitler and his Nazis into the government. They hoped they would be able to control them. [[ForgoneConclusion [[ForegoneConclusion They couldn't.]]

Added: 963

Changed: 3292

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The question of whether the Nazis were "voted into power" or seized it sometimes comes up. On the one hand, it's true that the Nazi party never won an absolute majority of votes -- in the March 1933 election with Hitler already chancellor, the National Socialist party gained 43.9% of the vote[[note]]Even ''with'' voter intimidation and persecution of leftists[[/note]]. While this may seem extraordinary, it only seems so to countries with a two-party system (like the US). Many countries in the world have multiple parties in their governments, requiring parties to make alliances and form coalitions to govern effectively. A party receiving 44% of the vote would constitute a clear win. Even though the Nazis "only" held 44% of the vote, its opponents were fractured into so many little parties they didn't matter. The German government, seeing the Nazis' popularity and desperate for stability, felt they had to at least work with them, and invited them into the cabinet. While later the Nazis certainly capitalized on popular support to seize ''complete'' power, it would incorrect to state that popular support didn't exist. [[note]]After all, the German people never threw the Nazis out throughout the entire war.[[/note]]

Historians' perceptions of the Weimar Republic differ. Marxist historians present it as an example of capitalism in crisis, arguing that the rise of the far-right and later the Nazis was orchestrated and abetted by business interests to preserve their power. Others, like William L. Shirer, present it as being doomed from the start; when Friedrich Ebert colluded with the German Army to crush the Spartakist Revolt, and that the later history was simply a failed state stumbling from crisis to crisis until its inevitable final collapse. Still more, like Ian Kershaw, adopt a more moderate approach, pointing out that at no point was the rise of Hitler and the end of the republic inevitable; on the contrary, the Republic gained strength during the boom years, and, even after the crisis of the Great Depression: the electoral support of the anti-democratic forces of Nazism and Communism was actually falling and the Nazi party almost bankrupt by the time Franz von Papen made his fateful decision to invite the Nazis into the cabinet in 1933.

to:

Near the end, the Republic was in chaos. No party could gain a majority, and they all hated each other so much that forming a coalition was impossible. At the very first meeting of the Reichstag in 1932, the first and only thing it did was dissolve itself and call for new elections. In 1933 there still wasn't a majority and the German government was desperate, feeling that if they didn't act there'd be a civil war. The Nazis at this time, while without a majority, were the largest party. Faced with either working with them or declaring a national emergency, President Hindenburg invited Hitler and his Nazis into the government. They hoped they would be able to control them. [[ForgoneConclusion They couldn't.]]

The question of whether the Nazis were "voted into power" or seized it sometimes comes up. On the one hand, it's true that the Nazi party never won an absolute majority of votes -- in the March 1933 election with Hitler already chancellor, the National Socialist party gained 43.9% of the vote[[note]]Even ''with'' voter intimidation and persecution of leftists[[/note]]. While this may seem extraordinary, it only seems so to countries with a two-party system (like the US). Many countries in the world have multiple parties in their governments, requiring parties to make alliances and form coalitions to govern effectively. A In such a system a party receiving 44% of the vote would constitute is a clear big win. Even though the Nazis "only" held 44% of the vote, its opponents were fractured into so many little parties they didn't matter. The German government, seeing the Nazis' popularity and desperate for stability, felt they had to at least work with them, and invited them into the cabinet. While later the Nazis certainly capitalized on popular support to seize ''complete'' power, it would be incorrect to state that popular support didn't exist. [[note]]After all, the German people never threw the Nazis out throughout the entire war.[[/note]]

Historians' perceptions of the Weimar Republic differ. Marxist historians present it as an example of capitalism in crisis, arguing that the rise of the far-right and later the Nazis was orchestrated and abetted by business interests to preserve their power. Others, like William L. Shirer, present it as being doomed from the start; when Friedrich Ebert colluded with the German Army to crush the Spartakist Revolt, start, and that the its later history was simply a failed state stumbling from crisis to crisis until its inevitable final collapse. Still more, like Ian Kershaw, adopt a more moderate approach, pointing out that at no point was the rise of Hitler and the end of the republic inevitable; on the contrary, the Republic gained strength during the boom years, and, even after the crisis of the Great Depression: the electoral support of the anti-democratic forces of Nazism and Communism was actually falling and the Nazi party almost bankrupt by the time Franz von Papen made his fateful decision to invite the Nazis into the cabinet in 1933.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The question of whether the Nazis were "voted into power" or seized it sometimes comes up. On the one hand, it's true that the Nazi party never won an absolute majority of votes -- in the March 1933 election with Hitler already chancellor, the National Socialist party gained 43.9% of the vote[[note]]Even ''with'' voter intimidation and persecution of leftists[[/note]]. While this may seem extraordinary, it only seems so to countries with a two-party system (like the US). Many countries in the world have multiple parties in their governments, requiring parties to make alliances and form coalitions to govern effectively. A party receiving 44% of the vote would constitute a clear win. Even though the Nazis "only" held 44% of the vote, its opponents were fractured into so many little parties they didn't matter. The German government, seeing the Nazis' popularity and desperate for stability, felt they had to at least work with them, and invited them into the cabinet. While later the Nazis certainly capitalized on popular support to seize ''complete'' power, it would incorrect to state that popular support didn't exist. [[note]]After all, the German people never threw the Nazis out throughout the entire war - unlike in Italy, which switched sides.[[/note]]

to:

The question of whether the Nazis were "voted into power" or seized it sometimes comes up. On the one hand, it's true that the Nazi party never won an absolute majority of votes -- in the March 1933 election with Hitler already chancellor, the National Socialist party gained 43.9% of the vote[[note]]Even ''with'' voter intimidation and persecution of leftists[[/note]]. While this may seem extraordinary, it only seems so to countries with a two-party system (like the US). Many countries in the world have multiple parties in their governments, requiring parties to make alliances and form coalitions to govern effectively. A party receiving 44% of the vote would constitute a clear win. Even though the Nazis "only" held 44% of the vote, its opponents were fractured into so many little parties they didn't matter. The German government, seeing the Nazis' popularity and desperate for stability, felt they had to at least work with them, and invited them into the cabinet. While later the Nazis certainly capitalized on popular support to seize ''complete'' power, it would incorrect to state that popular support didn't exist. [[note]]After all, the German people never threw the Nazis out throughout the entire war - unlike in Italy, which switched sides.war.[[/note]]

Changed: 1338

Removed: 195

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


It's important to note, however, that the Nazi party never won a majority of votes -- in the March 1933 election with Hitler already chancellor, the National Socialist party gained 43.9% of the vote[[note]]Even ''with'' voter intimidation and persecution of leftists. Their previous election result in November 1932 was 33%, a result that panicked them and convinced them to seize power before a worse decline.[[/note]], and because of proportional representation, 43% of the seats in the Reichstag,[[note]]There's anecdotal evidence that Goebbels argued that proportional representation actually staved off the Nazification of Germany for a couple years.[[/note]] and had to resort to arm-twisting the smaller conservative parties into accepting his "reforms". Even during the time of the one-party state, many Germans only supported the Nazis out of necessity.

Mostly, people were just concerned with economical hardships and crushed national pride, and manipulating these two sore points was what allowed Nazis to eventually gain control over the society.

to:

It's important to note, however, The question of whether the Nazis were "voted into power" or seized it sometimes comes up. On the one hand, it's true that the Nazi party never won a an absolute majority of votes -- in the March 1933 election with Hitler already chancellor, the National Socialist party gained 43.9% of the vote[[note]]Even ''with'' voter intimidation and persecution of leftists. Their previous election result leftists[[/note]]. While this may seem extraordinary, it only seems so to countries with a two-party system (like the US). Many countries in November 1932 was 33%, the world have multiple parties in their governments, requiring parties to make alliances and form coalitions to govern effectively. A party receiving 44% of the vote would constitute a result that panicked clear win. Even though the Nazis "only" held 44% of the vote, its opponents were fractured into so many little parties they didn't matter. The German government, seeing the Nazis' popularity and desperate for stability, felt they had to at least work with them, and invited them and convinced them into the cabinet. While later the Nazis certainly capitalized on popular support to seize power before a worse decline.[[/note]], and because of proportional representation, 43% of the seats in the Reichstag,[[note]]There's anecdotal evidence ''complete'' power, it would incorrect to state that Goebbels argued that proportional representation actually staved off popular support didn't exist. [[note]]After all, the Nazification of Germany for a couple years.[[/note]] and had to resort to arm-twisting the smaller conservative parties into accepting his "reforms". Even during the time of the one-party state, many Germans only supported German people never threw the Nazis out of necessity.

Mostly, people were just concerned with economical hardships and crushed national pride, and manipulating these two sore points was what allowed Nazis to eventually gain control over
throughout the society.
entire war - unlike in Italy, which switched sides.[[/note]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Economically, though... well, the Mark suffered from RidiculousExchangeRates, thousands of people lost any money that wasn't saved as gold or silver, and when things looked as if they had somewhat stabilized, the economical crisis of 1929 struck. Germany became so ruined that people didn't even hesitate to give their vote for AdolfHitler after he promised them economic prosperity. The Nazis beating up their opponents also contributed, though the violence was entirely mutual.

to:

Economically, though... well, the Mark suffered from RidiculousExchangeRates, thousands of people lost any money that wasn't saved as gold or silver, and when things looked as if they had somewhat stabilized, the economical crisis of 1929 struck. Germany became so ruined that people didn't even hesitate to give their vote for AdolfHitler UsefulNotes/AdolfHitler after he promised them economic prosperity. The Nazis beating up their opponents also contributed, though the violence was entirely mutual.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Correcting a typo: Capital to Capitol.


Weimar (so called because that's where the constitution was written - Berlin remained the capital [[note]]but when the constitution was made, there was too much unrest there (again), so the delegates, fearing for their lives, moved to the much-quieter city of Weimar[[/note]]) was the government that ran Germany from the end of WorldWarOne until ThoseWackyNazis gained power.

to:

Weimar (so called because that's where the constitution was written - Berlin remained the capital capitol [[note]]but when the constitution was made, there was too much unrest there (again), so the delegates, fearing for their lives, moved to the much-quieter city of Weimar[[/note]]) was the government that ran Germany from the end of WorldWarOne until ThoseWackyNazis gained power.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The first few years (and for that matter the last few years) of the Weimar Republic was a time of enormous political instability. Between 1918 and 1923 there was an attempted coup by either the far right or the far left every year, as well as almost 500 political assassinations, most of which went unpunished by the toothless democracy. The last one in 1923, the Munich Beer Putsch, was actually led by AdolfHitler. He got a year in jail and wrote ''Mein Kampf''.

to:

The first few years (and for that matter the last few years) of the Weimar Republic was a time of enormous political instability. Between 1918 and 1923 there was an attempted coup by either the far right or the far left every year, as well as almost 500 political assassinations, most of which went unpunished by the toothless democracy. The last one in 1923, the Munich Beer Putsch, was actually led by AdolfHitler.UsefulNotes/AdolfHitler. He got a year in jail and wrote ''Mein Kampf''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Structurally, the Republic wasn't actually terribly different from the Hohenzollern Empire. Rather than an Emperor, there was a directly-elected ''[[ThePresidentsOfGermany Reichspräsident]]'' (Reich President), who on account of his level of power was called (only half-jokingly) the ''[[CaptainErsatz Ersatzkaiser]]'' ("Fake/Replacement Emperor"). Other than that, there were only a few other changes, the requirement that the Chancellor have the support of the Reichstag and the extensive emergency powers of the President (Article 48) being the most important. Their new constitution was supposed to be the Best Constitution Ever, thus uniting the best things (considered) from the constitutions of the most successful western democracies: A strong president as in the US of A, a strong parliament as in the (Third) French republic, and direct democracy / plesbiscites as in Switzerland. [[GoldenMeanFallacy All of these backfired spectacularly]]: The strength of the president became a problem when a half-senile, easily influenced Hindenburg had almost-dictatorial powers; the strong parliament, which could kick out every government they didn't like, made governing first difficult and finally impossible, when the Nazis and the Commies got more than 50% of the votes; and the plebiscites were welcome opportunities for agitators from both left and right to spread their propaganda.

to:

Structurally, the Republic wasn't actually terribly different from the Hohenzollern Empire. Rather than an Emperor, there was a directly-elected ''[[ThePresidentsOfGermany ''[[UsefulNotes/ThePresidentsOfGermany Reichspräsident]]'' (Reich President), who on account of his level of power was called (only half-jokingly) the ''[[CaptainErsatz Ersatzkaiser]]'' ("Fake/Replacement Emperor"). Other than that, there were only a few other changes, the requirement that the Chancellor have the support of the Reichstag and the extensive emergency powers of the President (Article 48) being the most important. Their new constitution was supposed to be the Best Constitution Ever, thus uniting the best things (considered) from the constitutions of the most successful western democracies: A strong president as in the US of A, a strong parliament as in the (Third) French republic, and direct democracy / plesbiscites as in Switzerland. [[GoldenMeanFallacy All of these backfired spectacularly]]: The strength of the president became a problem when a half-senile, easily influenced Hindenburg had almost-dictatorial powers; the strong parliament, which could kick out every government they didn't like, made governing first difficult and finally impossible, when the Nazis and the Commies got more than 50% of the votes; and the plebiscites were welcome opportunities for agitators from both left and right to spread their propaganda.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


->''Germany was having trouble, what a sad, sad story...''

to:

->''Germany ->''[[Film/TheProducers Germany was having trouble, what a sad, sad story...''
]]''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Mostly, though people were just concerned with economical hardships and crushed national pride, and manipulating these two sore points was what allowed Nazis to eventually gain control over the society.

to:

Mostly, though people were just concerned with economical hardships and crushed national pride, and manipulating these two sore points was what allowed Nazis to eventually gain control over the society.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Ironically Friedrich Ebert, the chief founder and first president of the Weimar Republic had not wanted to establish a republic at all. Though a social democrat, he was also a monarchist and wanted to keep the Hohenzollerns (albeit reduced to figurehead status as in Britain); the declaration of the republic was only a desperate move by a member of his cabinet to stop the communists declaring one instead. Technically, it failed in that - the Communists declared a Council Republic a few hours later. Very few people cared about the second declaration. After that there was no going back, even if the monarchists wished so.

to:

Ironically Friedrich Ebert, the chief founder and first president of the Weimar Republic had not wanted to establish a republic at all. Though a social democrat, he was also a monarchist and wanted to keep the Hohenzollerns (albeit reduced to figurehead status as in Britain); the declaration of the republic was only a desperate move by a member of his cabinet to stop the communists declaring one instead. Technically, it failed in that - the Communists communists declared a Council Soviet Republic a few hours later. Very few people cared about the second declaration. After that there was no going back, even if the monarchists wished so.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:


Historians' perceptions of the Weimar Republic differ. Marxist historians present it as an example of capitalism in crisis, arguing that the rise of the far-right and later the Nazis was orchestrated and abetted by business interests to preserve their power. Others, like William L. Shirer, present it as being doomed from the start; when Friedrich Ebert colluded with the German Army to crush the Spartakist Revolt, and that the later history was simply a failed state stumbling from crisis to crisis until its inevitable final collapse. Still more, like Ian Kershaw, adopt a more moderate approach, pointing out that at no point was the rise of Hitler and the end of the republic inevitable; on the contrary, the Republic gained strength during the boom years, and, even after the crisis of the Great Depression: the electoral support of the anti-democratic forces of Nazism and Communism was actually falling and the Nazi party almost bankrupt by the time Franz von Papen made his fateful decision to invite the Nazis into the cabinet in 1933.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
hottip cleanup / removal


Weimar (so called because that's where the constitution was written - Berlin remained the capital [[hottip:* :but when the constitution was made, there was too much unrest there (again), so the delegates, fearing for their lives, moved to the much-quieter city of Weimar]]) was the government that ran Germany from the end of WorldWarOne until ThoseWackyNazis gained power.

to:

Weimar (so called because that's where the constitution was written - Berlin remained the capital [[hottip:* :but [[note]]but when the constitution was made, there was too much unrest there (again), so the delegates, fearing for their lives, moved to the much-quieter city of Weimar]]) Weimar[[/note]]) was the government that ran Germany from the end of WorldWarOne until ThoseWackyNazis gained power.



It's important to note, however, that the Nazi party never won a majority of votes -- in the March 1933 election with Hitler already chancellor, the National Socialist party gained 43.9% of the vote[[hottip:*:Even ''with'' voter intimidation and persecution of leftists. Their previous election result in November 1932 was 33%, a result that panicked them and convinced them to seize power before a worse decline.]], and because of proportional representation, 43% of the seats in the Reichstag,[[hottip:*:There's anecdotal evidence that Goebbels argued that proportional representation actually staved off the Nazification of Germany for a couple years.]] and had to resort to arm-twisting the smaller conservative parties into accepting his "reforms". Even during the time of the one-party state, many Germans only supported the Nazis out of necessity.

to:

It's important to note, however, that the Nazi party never won a majority of votes -- in the March 1933 election with Hitler already chancellor, the National Socialist party gained 43.9% of the vote[[hottip:*:Even vote[[note]]Even ''with'' voter intimidation and persecution of leftists. Their previous election result in November 1932 was 33%, a result that panicked them and convinced them to seize power before a worse decline.]], [[/note]], and because of proportional representation, 43% of the seats in the Reichstag,[[hottip:*:There's Reichstag,[[note]]There's anecdotal evidence that Goebbels argued that proportional representation actually staved off the Nazification of Germany for a couple years.]] [[/note]] and had to resort to arm-twisting the smaller conservative parties into accepting his "reforms". Even during the time of the one-party state, many Germans only supported the Nazis out of necessity.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


It's important to note, however, that the Nazi party never won a majority of votes -- in the March 1933 election with Hitler already chancellor, the National Socialist party gained 43.9% of the vote[[hottip:*:Even ''with'' voter intimidation and persecution of leftists. Their previous election result in November 1932 was 33%, a result that panicked them and convinced them to seize power before a worse decline.]], and because of proportional representation, 43% of the seats in the Reichstag,[[hottip:*:There's anecdotal evidence that Goebbels argued that proportional representation actually staved off the Nazification of Germany for a couple years.]] and had to resort to arm-twisting the smaller conservative parties into accepting his "reforms". Even during the time of the one-party state, most Germans only supported the Nazis out of necessity.

to:

It's important to note, however, that the Nazi party never won a majority of votes -- in the March 1933 election with Hitler already chancellor, the National Socialist party gained 43.9% of the vote[[hottip:*:Even ''with'' voter intimidation and persecution of leftists. Their previous election result in November 1932 was 33%, a result that panicked them and convinced them to seize power before a worse decline.]], and because of proportional representation, 43% of the seats in the Reichstag,[[hottip:*:There's anecdotal evidence that Goebbels argued that proportional representation actually staved off the Nazification of Germany for a couple years.]] and had to resort to arm-twisting the smaller conservative parties into accepting his "reforms". Even during the time of the one-party state, most many Germans only supported the Nazis out of necessity.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

->''Germany was having trouble, what a sad, sad story...''

If you're ever on ''{{QI}}'' and StephenFry asks you what Germany was called in 1930 (he hasn't done it yet, but it's bound to come up at some point), don't say "The Weimar Republic". That name is an invention of historians and was not used at the time (like TheBonnRepublic). The correct term is "Deutsches Reich" (German Empire).

Weimar (so called because that's where the constitution was written - Berlin remained the capital [[hottip:* :but when the constitution was made, there was too much unrest there (again), so the delegates, fearing for their lives, moved to the much-quieter city of Weimar]]) was the government that ran Germany from the end of WorldWarOne until ThoseWackyNazis gained power.

Ironically Friedrich Ebert, the chief founder and first president of the Weimar Republic had not wanted to establish a republic at all. Though a social democrat, he was also a monarchist and wanted to keep the Hohenzollerns (albeit reduced to figurehead status as in Britain); the declaration of the republic was only a desperate move by a member of his cabinet to stop the communists declaring one instead. Technically, it failed in that - the Communists declared a Council Republic a few hours later. Very few people cared about the second declaration. After that there was no going back, even if the monarchists wished so.

Structurally, the Republic wasn't actually terribly different from the Hohenzollern Empire. Rather than an Emperor, there was a directly-elected ''[[ThePresidentsOfGermany Reichspräsident]]'' (Reich President), who on account of his level of power was called (only half-jokingly) the ''[[CaptainErsatz Ersatzkaiser]]'' ("Fake/Replacement Emperor"). Other than that, there were only a few other changes, the requirement that the Chancellor have the support of the Reichstag and the extensive emergency powers of the President (Article 48) being the most important. Their new constitution was supposed to be the Best Constitution Ever, thus uniting the best things (considered) from the constitutions of the most successful western democracies: A strong president as in the US of A, a strong parliament as in the (Third) French republic, and direct democracy / plesbiscites as in Switzerland. [[GoldenMeanFallacy All of these backfired spectacularly]]: The strength of the president became a problem when a half-senile, easily influenced Hindenburg had almost-dictatorial powers; the strong parliament, which could kick out every government they didn't like, made governing first difficult and finally impossible, when the Nazis and the Commies got more than 50% of the votes; and the plebiscites were welcome opportunities for agitators from both left and right to spread their propaganda.

The first few years (and for that matter the last few years) of the Weimar Republic was a time of enormous political instability. Between 1918 and 1923 there was an attempted coup by either the far right or the far left every year, as well as almost 500 political assassinations, most of which went unpunished by the toothless democracy. The last one in 1923, the Munich Beer Putsch, was actually led by AdolfHitler. He got a year in jail and wrote ''Mein Kampf''.

Culturally, the Weimar Republic was very productive. Most notably, it contained the Cabaret culture (which produced Creator/MarleneDietrich), [[{{Dada}} Dadaism]], Bauhaus architecture, German Expressionism and director Creator/FritzLang, who probably created the RobotGirl trope (and others) in ''Film/{{Metropolis}}''. Even Creator/AlfredHitchcock made some British-German coproductions during this time. Then there were [[DichterAndDenker lots and lots of famous writers and intellectuals]]: Creator/BertoltBrecht, Kurt Tucholsky, Erich Maria Remarque, Erich Kästner, brothers Thomas and Heinrich Mann, Elias Canetti, Lion Feuchtwanger, Ödön von Horváth, Robert Musil, and so on.

Economically, though... well, the Mark suffered from RidiculousExchangeRates, thousands of people lost any money that wasn't saved as gold or silver, and when things looked as if they had somewhat stabilized, the economical crisis of 1929 struck. Germany became so ruined that people didn't even hesitate to give their vote for AdolfHitler after he promised them economic prosperity. The Nazis beating up their opponents also contributed, though the violence was entirely mutual.

In fact, in the ''Language of the Third Reich'' one of the characters, an old Jewish doctor, mentions that it was possible to see who won the last street brawl just by the injuries alone: if there were mostly crushed skulls and blunt trauma from beer bottles, chair legs or just plain old clubs -- that was the Communists beating Nazis, and if the wounds were mostly by the knife -- then vice versa, such was the political climate of the time.

It's important to note, however, that the Nazi party never won a majority of votes -- in the March 1933 election with Hitler already chancellor, the National Socialist party gained 43.9% of the vote[[hottip:*:Even ''with'' voter intimidation and persecution of leftists. Their previous election result in November 1932 was 33%, a result that panicked them and convinced them to seize power before a worse decline.]], and because of proportional representation, 43% of the seats in the Reichstag,[[hottip:*:There's anecdotal evidence that Goebbels argued that proportional representation actually staved off the Nazification of Germany for a couple years.]] and had to resort to arm-twisting the smaller conservative parties into accepting his "reforms". Even during the time of the one-party state, most Germans only supported the Nazis out of necessity.

Mostly, though people were just concerned with economical hardships and crushed national pride, and manipulating these two sore points was what allowed Nazis to eventually gain control over the society.
----
!! Films made in this era

* ''Film/TheBlueAngel''
* ''Film/TheCabinetOfDrCaligari''
* ''Film/DrMabuseTheGambler''
** ''Film/DasTestamentDesDoktorMabuse''
* ''Film/{{M}}''
* ''Film/{{Metropolis}}''
* ''Film/{{Nosferatu}}''

!! Works of fiction set in this era:

* The musical and movie ''{{Theatre/Cabaret}}'' takes place during this time. The rise of the Nazis helps lead to a [[spoiler:DownerEnding]].
* ''Literature/TheTinDrum'' is partially set in this era, though it also covers WorldWarTwo and the [[WestGermany aftermath]].
* "Ich Erinnere Mich an die Weimarer Republik", a song by [[TheWorldInfernoFriendshipSociety The World/Inferno Friendship Society]], told from the point of view of PeterLorre and other German exiles.
* The part of ''Anime/FullmetalAlchemist: [[TheMovie Conqueror of Shamballa]]'' which takes place in our world is mostly in this era; in fact, the Munich Beer Putsch occurs on-screen during the events of the film.
* ''Film/ShadowOfTheVampire'', a movie that mythologizes the production of ''Nosferatu''. The movie fairly quickly switches locations from Germany to Czechoslovakia, however.
* A few strips in ''AxisPowersHetalia'' show Germany towards the tail end of the Republic, growing more than peeved at having to put up with the Treaty of Versailles.

----

Top