Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Main / ThoughtCrime

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[folder:Comic Books ]]

to:

[[folder:Comic Books ]]Books]]



[[folder:Fan Works ]]

to:

[[folder:Fan Works ]]Works]]



[[folder:Film ]]

to:

[[folder:Film ]][[folder:Film]]



[[folder:Literature ]]

to:

[[folder:Literature ]][[folder:Literature]]



[[folder:Live Action TV ]]

to:

[[folder:Live Action TV ]]TV]]



[[folder:Religion ]]

to:

[[folder:Religion ]][[folder:Religion]]



[[folder:Stand Up Comedy ]]

to:

[[folder:Stand Up Comedy ]]Comedy]]



[[folder:Tabletop RPG ]]

to:

[[folder:Tabletop RPG ]]RPG]]



[[folder:Webcomics ]]

to:

[[folder:Webcomics ]][[folder:Webcomics]]



[[folder:Western Animation ]]

to:

[[folder:Western Animation ]]Animation]]



[[folder:Real Life ]]

to:

[[folder:Real Life ]]Life]]

Added: 453

Changed: 881

Removed: 218

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[folder: Comic Books ]]

to:

[[folder: Comic [[folder:Comic Books ]]
]]






[[folder: Fan Works ]]

to:

[[folder: Fan [[folder:Fan Works ]]
]]






[[folder: Film ]]

to:

[[folder: Film ]]
[[folder:Film ]]



[[folder: Literature ]]

to:

[[folder: Literature ]]
[[folder:Literature ]]






[[folder: Live Action TV ]]

to:

[[folder: Live [[folder:Live Action TV ]]
]]






[[folder: Music]]

to:

[[folder: Music]][[folder:Music]]



[[folder: Newspaper Comics]]

to:

[[folder: Newspaper Comics]]
[[folder:Newspaper Comics]]






[[folder: Religion ]]

to:

[[folder: Religion ]]
[[folder:Religion ]]






[[folder: Stand Up Comedy ]]

to:

[[folder: Stand [[folder:Stand Up Comedy ]]
]]






[[folder: Tabletop RPG ]]

to:

[[folder: Tabletop [[folder:Tabletop RPG ]]
]]






[[folder: Webcomics ]]

* ''Webcomic/SluggyFreelance''[='=]s 4U City enforced mandatory happiness with involuntary drugging. And mandatory efficiency with mandatory drugging. And so on. The alternative was to be thrown down a judgement chute.

to:

[[folder: Webcomics ]]

[[folder:Video Games]]
* ''Webcomic/SluggyFreelance''[='=]s 4U City enforced mandatory happiness with involuntary drugging. And mandatory efficiency with mandatory drugging. And so on. ''VideoGame/FateGrandOrder'': The alternative was third [[AlternateHistory Lostbelt]] is one where Qin Shi Huang, the first emperor of China, achieved immortality and conquered the world. He did achieve world peace, but only because the humans living there are kept illiterate, have no concept of family, and aren't allowed to be thrown down venture outside of their villages. If any person shows signs of "[[InsistentTerminology Confucianism]]", which is to say learning how to read, making art that doesn't worship the emperor, or leaving their village to explore, Qin Shi Huang's response is a judgement chute.
ColonyDrop that wipes out their entire village.



[[folder: Western Animation ]]

to:

[[folder: Western [[folder:Webcomics ]]
* ''Webcomic/SluggyFreelance''[='=]s 4U City enforced mandatory happiness with involuntary drugging. And mandatory efficiency with mandatory drugging. And so on. The alternative was to be thrown down a judgement chute.
[[/folder]]

[[folder:Western
Animation ]]
]]



* ''WesternAnimation/MyLittlePonyFriendshipIsMagic'': Our Town, the town of equality founded by Starlight Glimmer, shows frequent usage of this. By the time the Mane Six arrive, the ponies living there are so afraid of Starlight that they willingly subject themselves to brainwashing if they find themselves thinking "unequal" thoughts, lest Starlight find out herself and do something even more horrible to them.






[[folder: Real Life ]]

to:

[[folder: Real [[folder:Real Life ]]
]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Naturally, when no one [[WhoWatchesTheWatchmen is allowed to guard the guards]], the guards abuse their power left, right and center. Add to that the fact that no person or organization on this earth is capable of getting everything right, and [[DontShootTheMessage even the best-intentioned crimethink laws end up convincing people that their purpose is to keep the masses from]] [[HeKnowsTooMuch knowing too much]].

to:

Naturally, when no one [[WhoWatchesTheWatchmen is allowed to guard the guards]], the guards abuse their power left, right and center. Add to that the fact that no person or organization on this earth is capable of getting everything right, and [[DontShootTheMessage even the best-intentioned crimethink laws laws]] end up convincing people that their purpose is to keep the masses from]] from [[HeKnowsTooMuch knowing too much]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* ''{{Series/Reaper}}'' follows the example of Christianity under Religion in showing one of the [[MonsterOfTheWeek escapees from Hell]] being someone whose only sin was having sinful thoughts. The main character outright questions the idea that someone can be condemned to eternal torment for merely ''thinking'' sinfully but never acting on it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* A certain Todd Nickerson has made some videos where he admits to being a pedophile. Despite making it clear he doesn't want to be this way and [[WouldntHurtAChild never intends to actually molest a kid]], a lot of people still hate him just for having such urges in the first place. The same reaction has occurred when other comments that could be called "positive" about pedophiles/pedophilia are made, even they're simply "That person is good for not acting on their urges" or "Therapy should be provided for them" and maybe we can find a cure. Cue many suggestions that the cure for pedophilia is [[KillEmAll death]]. Anything other than just stating condemnation, for some, seems to be unforgivable.

to:

* A certain Todd Nickerson has made some videos where he admits to being a pedophile. Despite making it clear he doesn't want to be this way and [[WouldntHurtAChild never intends to actually molest a kid]], a lot of people still hate him just for having such urges in the first place. The same reaction has occurred when other comments that could be called "positive" about pedophiles/pedophilia are made, even they're if simply "That person is good for not acting on their urges" or "Therapy should be provided for them" and maybe "maybe we can find a cure.cure". Cue many suggestions that the cure for pedophilia is [[KillEmAll death]]. Anything other than just stating condemnation, for some, seems to be unforgivable.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[caption-width-right:324:[[DisproportionateRetribution Not good enough. Off to the evaporation vats with you!]]]]

to:

[[caption-width-right:324:[[DisproportionateRetribution Not good enough. Off to the evaporation vaporization vats with you!]]]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** ''ComicBook/AndersonPsiDivision'': Played for dark laughs when Anderson is driving her Lawmaster before suddenly stopping to beat up several confused perps. She tells control to pick them up for "insulting a Judge and resisting arrest".

to:

** ''ComicBook/AndersonPsiDivision'': Played for dark laughs when Anderson is driving her Lawmaster before suddenly stopping to beat up several confused perps.perps who only looked in her direction. She tells control to pick them up for "insulting a Judge and resisting arrest".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

[[caption-width-right:324:[[DisproportionateRetribution Not good enough. Off to the evaporation vats with you!]]]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Film/MinorityReport'': Most of the "crimes" which the Precrime Division stops seem to be this. Suspects are caught in the attempt to commit a murder at times, but many don't even get that far. In the latter case, an ordinary charge of attempted murder could be made. For most though, they're only "crime" is just ''wanting'' to commit a murder, but not actually doing so. They're all detained without trial regardless.

to:

* ''Film/MinorityReport'': Most of the "crimes" which the Precrime Division stops seem to be this. Suspects are caught in the attempt to commit a murder at times, but many don't even get that far. In the latter case, an ordinary charge of attempted murder could be made. For most though, they're only "crime" is just ''wanting'' to commit a murder, but not actually doing so. They're all detained without trial regardless. Becomes outright dystopian as the convicts, rather than being regularly imprisoned or executed, are ''tortured with footage of the precognition'' every waking moment, all to ensure they ''keep'' the criminal thoughts that got them convicted in the first place.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Even more [[Administrivia/RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgement controversially]] the same argument has been made against [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_crime hate crime]] legislation, since people are not just punished for committing a crime but for what they were thinking while doing it. For instance, assault is already a crime, but assaulting someone because they were ''black'' is a hate crime. So the specific motive is the difference.

to:

** Even more [[Administrivia/RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgement controversially]] the same argument has been made against [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_crime hate crime]] legislation, since people are not just punished for committing a crime but for what they were thinking while doing it. For instance, assault is already a crime, but assaulting someone because they were ''black'' is a hate crime. So the specific motive is the difference.difference; you can only be charged with a thought crime if it is directly linked to an ''actual'' crime.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* Touched on in the aptly named ''Series/LawAndOrderSpecialVictimsUnit'' episode "Thought Criminal". The criminal-of-the-week is a man who has constructed a sex torture dungeon across the street from a playground, fantasizes about using it, and has all the signs of becoming a rapist and murderer of children. However, he hasn't actually done anything yet. The episode then revolves around arresting a man for something he ''might'' act on (and he almost certainly will), or letting him walk and taking the chance of future victims. [[spoiler:The jury finds him not guilty, possibly with this trope in mind]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Following the Charlie Hebdo massacre (cartoonists and journalists who were killed by Islamic terrorists) in France on January 7, 2015, which caused the memetic message "Je suis Charlie" ("I am Charlie") to spread on the Internet as a way of defending free speech, journalist [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wW3vil_cJ7I Nathalie Saint-Cricq]] proposed, on public television, to 'spot and treat' schoolchildren who "were not Charlie". This didn't just include those who made genuine apologies for terrorism/religious extremism, but also those who expressed doubts about the message, criticized what the cartoonists did before they were killed or didn't respect moments of silence.

to:

* Following the Charlie Hebdo massacre (cartoonists and journalists who were killed by Islamic terrorists) in France on January 7, 2015, which caused the memetic message "Je suis Charlie" ("I am Charlie") to spread on the Internet as a way of defending free speech, journalist [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wW3vil_cJ7I Nathalie Saint-Cricq]] proposed, on public television, to 'spot and treat' schoolchildren who "were not Charlie". This didn't just include those who made genuine apologies for terrorism/religious extremism, but also those who expressed doubts about the message, criticized what the cartoonists did before they were killed or didn't respect moments of silence. This was [[{{Irony}} horribly ironic]] in defense of people who were murdered for "thoughtcrime" essentially themselves.



* A certain Todd Nickerson has made some videos where he admits to being a pedophile. Despite making it clear he doesn't want to be this way and [[WouldntHurtAChild never intends to actually molest a kid]], a lot of people still hate him just for having such urges in the first place.

to:

* A certain Todd Nickerson has made some videos where he admits to being a pedophile. Despite making it clear he doesn't want to be this way and [[WouldntHurtAChild never intends to actually molest a kid]], a lot of people still hate him just for having such urges in the first place. The same reaction has occurred when other comments that could be called "positive" about pedophiles/pedophilia are made, even they're simply "That person is good for not acting on their urges" or "Therapy should be provided for them" and maybe we can find a cure. Cue many suggestions that the cure for pedophilia is [[KillEmAll death]]. Anything other than just stating condemnation, for some, seems to be unforgivable.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* ''ComicBook/{{Low}}'': In the UnderwaterCity Voldin, optimism is a capital crime.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[folder: Newspaper Comics]]

* ''ComicStrip/TheBoondocks'': At one point, Robert punishes his grandson, Riley, not for thinking about doing something nefarious, but for ''looking'' like he was thinking it. Huey calls him out for this DisproportionateRetribution, but it's worth noting that actually Riley ''was'' thinking of causing chaos at the time. Robert [[RightForTheWrongReasons just had no real proof]].

[[/folder]]

Added: 254

Changed: 154

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* ''ComicBook/ThePunisher2099'': When Dr. Doom puts the Punisher in charge of the police force, he starts prosecuting people for having criminal impulses.
* After he acquires Brainiac technology in the bad ending of ''VideoGame/Injustice2'', ''ComicBook/InjusticeVsMastersOfTheUniverse'' reveals that Superman has expanded his totalitarian activities by arresting and jailing those who have criminal thoughts.

Added: 651

Changed: 654

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


->''"He could not help feeling a twinge of panic. It was absurd, since the writing of those particular words was not more dangerous than the initial act of opening the diary, but for a moment he was tempted to tear out the spoiled pages and abandon the enterprise altogether. He did not do so, however, because he knew that it was useless. Whether he wrote DOWN WITH BIG BROTHER, or whether he refrained from writing it, made no difference. Whether he went on with the diary, or whether he did not go on with it, made no difference. The Thought Police would get him just the same. He had committed -- would still have committed, even if he had never set pen to paper -- the essential crime that contained all others in itself. Thoughtcrime, they called it. Thoughtcrime was not a thing that could be concealed forever. You might dodge successfully for a while, even for years, but sooner or later they were bound to get you."''

to:

->''"He could not help feeling a twinge of panic. It was absurd, since the writing of those particular words was not more dangerous than the initial act of opening the diary, but for a moment he was tempted to tear out the spoiled pages and abandon the enterprise altogether. \\
He did not do so, however, because he knew that it was useless. Whether he wrote DOWN WITH BIG BROTHER, or whether he refrained from writing it, made no difference. Whether he went on with the diary, or whether he did not go on with it, made no difference. The Thought Police would get him just the same. He had committed -- would still have committed, even if he had never set pen to paper -- the essential crime that contained all others in itself. Thoughtcrime, they called it. Thoughtcrime was not a thing that could be concealed forever. You might dodge successfully for a while, even for years, but sooner or later they were bound to get you."''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


->''"Whether he wrote DOWN WITH BIG BROTHER, or whether he refrained from writing it, made no difference. Whether he went on with the diary, or whether he did not go on with it, made no difference. The Thought Police would get him just the same. He had committed -- would still have committed, even if he had never set pen to paper -- the essential crime that contained all others in itself. Thoughtcrime, they called it. Thoughtcrime was not a thing that could be concealed forever. You might dodge successfully for a while, even for years, but sooner or later they were bound to get you."''

to:

->''"Whether ->''"He could not help feeling a twinge of panic. It was absurd, since the writing of those particular words was not more dangerous than the initial act of opening the diary, but for a moment he was tempted to tear out the spoiled pages and abandon the enterprise altogether. He did not do so, however, because he knew that it was useless. Whether he wrote DOWN WITH BIG BROTHER, or whether he refrained from writing it, made no difference. Whether he went on with the diary, or whether he did not go on with it, made no difference. The Thought Police would get him just the same. He had committed -- would still have committed, even if he had never set pen to paper -- the essential crime that contained all others in itself. Thoughtcrime, they called it. Thoughtcrime was not a thing that could be concealed forever. You might dodge successfully for a while, even for years, but sooner or later they were bound to get you."''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Even more [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgement controversially]] the same argument has been made against [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_crime hate crime]] legislation, since people are not just punished for committing a crime but for what they were thinking while doing it. For instance, assault is already a crime, but assaulting someone because they were ''black'' is a hate crime. So the specific motive is the difference.

to:

** Even more [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgement [[Administrivia/RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgement controversially]] the same argument has been made against [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_crime hate crime]] legislation, since people are not just punished for committing a crime but for what they were thinking while doing it. For instance, assault is already a crime, but assaulting someone because they were ''black'' is a hate crime. So the specific motive is the difference.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* [[PoliticalCorrectnessGoneMad Political Correctness]] is a more "modern" version of Thought Crime Police.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* [[PoliticalCorrectnessGoneMad Political Correctness]] is a more "modern" version of Thought Crime Police.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* A certain Todd Nickerson has made some videos where he admits to being a pedophile. Despite making it clear he doesn't want to be this way and [[WouldntHurtAChild never intends to actually molest a kid]], a lot of people still hate him just for having such urges in the first place.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Film/MinorityReport'': Most of the "crimes" which the Precrime Division stops seem to fallen into this. Suspects usually are caught in the attempt to commit a murder at times, but many don't even get that far. In the latter case, an ordinary charge of attempted murder could be made. For most though, they're only "crime" is just ''wanting'' to commit a murder, but not actually doing so. They're all detained without trial regardless.

to:

* ''Film/MinorityReport'': Most of the "crimes" which the Precrime Division stops seem to fallen into be this. Suspects usually are caught in the attempt to commit a murder at times, but many don't even get that far. In the latter case, an ordinary charge of attempted murder could be made. For most though, they're only "crime" is just ''wanting'' to commit a murder, but not actually doing so. They're all detained without trial regardless.

Added: 431

Changed: 459

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* ''Film/MinorityReport'': Most of the "crimes" which the Precrime Division stops seem to fallen into this. Suspects usually are caught in the attempt to commit a murder at times, but many don't even get that far. In the latter case, an ordinary charge of attempted murder could be made. For most though, they're only "crime" is just ''wanting'' to commit a murder, but not actually doing so. They're all detained without trial regardless.



** Both of them, among other oppressive regimes, also imprisoned people or sought to re-educate them just for having beliefs which contradicted the official one. It didn't matter whether they actually tried to violently or peacefully resist (though that of course would also get you punished). Just writing or speaking things which criticized or disagreed with the government would be enough for you to be imprisoned, even killed.



* The Khmer Rouge, among their many crimes against humanity and DisproportionateRetribution, made certain thoughts punishable by death in their campaign to reset Cambodia to "year zero." This included thinking about the past, holding any religious beliefs, showing too much individuality [[note]] like eating by yourself [[/note]], or showing any attachment to western ideals.
* Following the Charlie Hebdo massacre (cartoonists and journalists who were killed by Islamic terrorists) in France on January 7, 2015, which caused the memetic message "Je suis Charlie" ("I am Charlie") to spread on the Internet as a way of defending free speech, journalist [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wW3vil_cJ7I Nathalie Saint-Cricq]] proposed, on public television, to 'spot and treat' schoolchildren who "were not Charlie". This didn't just include those who made genuine apology of terrorism/religious extremism, but also those who expressed doubts about the message, criticized what the cartoonists did before they were killed or didn't respect moments of silence.
* "Gay conversion therapy" seeks to extinguish homosexuality whether the subject has engaged in any sexual behaviour or not.

to:

* The Khmer Rouge, among their many crimes against humanity and DisproportionateRetribution, made certain thoughts punishable by death in their campaign to reset Cambodia to "year zero."{{year zero}}." This included thinking about the past, holding any religious beliefs, showing too much individuality [[note]] like individuality,[[note]]like eating by yourself [[/note]], yourself[[/note]] or showing any attachment to western Western ideals.
* Following the Charlie Hebdo massacre (cartoonists and journalists who were killed by Islamic terrorists) in France on January 7, 2015, which caused the memetic message "Je suis Charlie" ("I am Charlie") to spread on the Internet as a way of defending free speech, journalist [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wW3vil_cJ7I Nathalie Saint-Cricq]] proposed, on public television, to 'spot and treat' schoolchildren who "were not Charlie". This didn't just include those who made genuine apology of apologies for terrorism/religious extremism, but also those who expressed doubts about the message, criticized what the cartoonists did before they were killed or didn't respect moments of silence.
* "Gay conversion therapy" seeks to extinguish homosexuality homosexuality, whether the subject has engaged in any sexual behaviour behavior or not.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Specifically Germany under the Nazis extended the pre-existing ban on homosexual acts, Paragraph 175, to include homosexual thoughts.


Added DiffLines:

* "Gay conversion therapy" seeks to extinguish homosexuality whether the subject has engaged in any sexual behaviour or not.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Under the reign of Henry VIII, it became treason to even ''think'' ill of the king, or to "imagine" his death.

to:

* Under the reign of Henry VIII, it became treason to even ''think'' ill of the king, or to "imagine" his death. The latter at least had some logic behind it; you could undermine the king by spreading rumors that he was fatally ill, triggering a SuccessionCrisis. However it got to the stage that his own doctors were [[ShootTheMessenger afraid to inform Henry VIII that he was dying]], which was necessary so he could seek absolution for his sins.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Following the Charlie Hebdo massacre (cartoonists and journalists who were killed by Islamic terrorists) in France on January 7, 2015, which caused the memetic message "Je suis Charlie" ("I am Charlie") to spread on the Internet as a way of defending free speech, journalist Nathalie Saint-Cricq proposed, on public television, to 'spot and treat' schoolchildren who "were not Charlie". This didn't just include those who made genuine apology of terrorism/religious extremism, but also those who expressed doubts about the message, criticized what the cartoonists did before they were killed or didn't respect moments of silence.

to:

* Following the Charlie Hebdo massacre (cartoonists and journalists who were killed by Islamic terrorists) in France on January 7, 2015, which caused the memetic message "Je suis Charlie" ("I am Charlie") to spread on the Internet as a way of defending free speech, journalist [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wW3vil_cJ7I Nathalie Saint-Cricq Saint-Cricq]] proposed, on public television, to 'spot and treat' schoolchildren who "were not Charlie". This didn't just include those who made genuine apology of terrorism/religious extremism, but also those who expressed doubts about the message, criticized what the cartoonists did before they were killed or didn't respect moments of silence.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Following the Charlie Hebdo massacre (cartoonists and journalists who were killed by Islamic terrorists) in France on January 7, 2015, which caused the memetic message "Je suis Charlie" ("I am Charlie") to spread on the Internet as a way of defending free speech, journalist Nathalie Saint-Cricq proposed, on public television, to 'spot and treat' schoolchildren who "were not Charlie". This didn't just include those who made genuine apology of terrorism/religious extremism, but also those who expressed doubts about the message, criticized the cartoonists or didn't respect moments of silence.

to:

* Following the Charlie Hebdo massacre (cartoonists and journalists who were killed by Islamic terrorists) in France on January 7, 2015, which caused the memetic message "Je suis Charlie" ("I am Charlie") to spread on the Internet as a way of defending free speech, journalist Nathalie Saint-Cricq proposed, on public television, to 'spot and treat' schoolchildren who "were not Charlie". This didn't just include those who made genuine apology of terrorism/religious extremism, but also those who expressed doubts about the message, criticized what the cartoonists did before they were killed or didn't respect moments of silence.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* Following the Charlie Hebdo massacre (cartoonists and journalists who were killed by Islamic terrorists) in France on January 7, 2015, which caused the memetic message "Je suis Charlie" ("I am Charlie") to spread on the Internet as a way of defending free speech, journalist Nathalie Saint-Cricq proposed, on public television, to 'spot and treat' schoolchildren who "were not Charlie". This didn't just include those who made genuine apology of terrorism/religious extremism, but also those who expressed doubts about the message, criticized the cartoonists or didn't respect moments of silence.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The idea behind "re-education camps" in Communist countries.

to:

* The idea behind "re-education camps" in UsefulNotes/NaziGermany and Communist countries.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Some scriptures of Literature/TheBible point out that thinking of a sin is just as bad as doing it in God's eyes. For example, a literal reading of the commandment "thou shalt not covet thy neighbor's wife" would indicate that the proscription is not merely against the ''act'' of adultery, but the very thought or feeling of envy. Indeed, the New Testament states that a man who lusts after a woman "has already committed adultery with her in his heart."

to:

* Some scriptures of Literature/TheBible point out that thinking of a sin is just as bad as doing it in God's eyes. For example, a literal reading of the commandment "thou shalt not covet thy neighbor's wife" would indicate that the proscription is not merely against the ''act'' of adultery, but the very thought or feeling of envy. Indeed, the New Testament Book of Matthew in Literature/TheFourGospels states that a man who lusts after a woman "has already "hath committed adultery with her already in his heart."

Top