Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Main / JustPlaneWrong

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In ''VideoGame/JurassicWorldEvolution'', ACU helicopters can lift 88 ton brachiosauruses without a problem. There is a chopper that can lift up to 80,000 lbs, but that’s clearly not what these are, and even so, the brachiosaurus is twice that weight.

to:

* In ''VideoGame/JurassicWorldEvolution'', ACU helicopters can lift 88 ton brachiosauruses sauropod dinosaurs without a problem. There is a chopper that can lift up to 80,000 lbs, pounds, but that’s clearly not what these are, and even so, many of the brachiosaurus is sauropods in game are twice that weight.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Calling all Soviet/Russian aircraft [=MiGs=] is equivalent to calling all US aircraft Boeings. Factually speaking, there are plenty of non-Mikoyan aircraft in Russian service — such as Sukhoi's Su-27 "Flanker". This habit is the result of SmallReferencePools: back in the UsefulNotes/ColdWar, the only time that Western civilians actually paid attention to Russian military aviation, most of their planes ''were'' indeed Mikoyan aircraft, and American ace pilots and the aircraft they flew who scored many kills against Cold War opponents were called "[=MiG=] Killers". Sukhoi did not come into much prominence until they introduced the Flanker, which was so close to the end of the Cold War that no American pilots ever flew in combat against them before the war ended (the only Sukhois involved in live combat during the Cold War, at least as reported by the US, were the Su-22s shot down in the 1981 Gulf of Sidra incident).

to:

* Calling all Soviet/Russian aircraft [=MiGs=] is equivalent to calling all US aircraft Boeings. Factually speaking, there are plenty of non-Mikoyan aircraft in Russian service — such as Sukhoi's Su-27 "Flanker". This habit is the result of SmallReferencePools: back in the UsefulNotes/ColdWar, the only time that Western civilians actually paid attention to Russian military aviation, most of their planes ''were'' indeed offensive fighters were predominantly Mikoyan aircraft, Bureau designs (Sukhoi mostly made ground-attack aircraft and defensive interceptors at the time), and American ace pilots and the aircraft they flew who scored many kills against Cold War opponents were called "[=MiG=] Killers". Killers" due to the fact that the Soviets were exporting only [=MiGs=] to North Korea and North Vietnam (they exported plenty of Sukhois to other countries, but said countries rarely fought the US or any US-aligned countries other than Israel). Sukhoi did not come into much international prominence until they introduced the Flanker, which was so close to the end of the Cold War that no American pilots ever flew in combat against them before the war ended (the only Sukhois involved in live combat during the Cold War, at least as reported by the US, were the Su-22s shot down in the 1981 Gulf of Sidra incident).

Added: 288

Changed: 558

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** The PBY Catalina the player mans the guns of in "Black Cats" has both Oerlikon 20mm cannons and Browning M1919 machine guns mounted on the bow. The cannons were often reported as a field modification to Catalinas in the Pacific, but they'd have to remove the machine guns to make the room for them - they weren't meant as an additional set of guns to support the M1919s but rather as straight-up replacements with better range and power. Additionally, the player's Catalina is severely undermanned - the real things had a crew of ten (pilot, copilot, flight engineer, navigator, radio and radar operators, and four gunners), but the player's crew is at half that (pilot and copilot alongside only two gunners, forcing the player character to waste time clambering between individual guns, and ''one'' guy [[CrewOfOne handling everything else]]), though in turn this helps answer the question of how your Catalina also has the room and engine power to carry up to six sailors pulled out of the ocean over the course of the mission.

to:

*** The PBY Catalina the player mans the guns of in "Black Cats" has both Oerlikon 20mm cannons and Browning M1919 machine guns mounted on the bow. The cannons were often reported as a field modification to Catalinas in the Pacific, but they'd have to remove the machine guns to make the room for them - they weren't meant as an additional set of guns to support the M1919s but rather as straight-up replacements with better range and power. The Oerlikons are also depicted as part of a flexible mount to fire wherever the front turret is facing, when in reality they were on [[FixedForwardFacingWeapon fixed mounts]]. Additionally, the player's Catalina is severely undermanned - the real things had a crew of ten (pilot, copilot, flight engineer, navigator, radio and radar operators, and four gunners), but the player's crew is at half that (pilot and copilot alongside only two gunners, forcing the player character to waste time clambering between individual guns, and ''one'' guy [[CrewOfOne handling everything else]]), though in turn this helps answer the question of how your Catalina also has the room and engine power to carry up to six sailors pulled out of the ocean over the course of the mission.mission.
*** The opening depicts the start of the war in the Pacific by way of having Zeroes dropping bombs, where more logical choices for such a mission would have been the "Kate" torpedo bomber or "Val" dive bomber - not to mention that the "bombs" in question are actually external fuel tanks.



** While a "Jug" certainly couldn't have a "reheat", the afterburner was actually around back then. The Italian Caproni-Campini [=CC1=] fighter prototype of 1940 used a radial engine to run a ducted fan (much like many modern radio-control flying models), and it did have a "thrust augmentator", which squirted aviation-grade gasoline into the duct behind the fans and ignited it. In other words, an afterburner. [[EarlyInstallmentWeirdness Early jet technology could get a little strange]], by modern standards.

to:

** While a "Jug" certainly couldn't have a "reheat", the afterburner was actually around back then. The Italian Caproni-Campini [=CC1=] fighter prototype of 1940 used a radial engine to run a ducted fan (much like many modern radio-control flying models), and it did have a "thrust augmentator", which squirted aviation-grade gasoline into the duct behind the fans and ignited it. In other words, an afterburner. [[EarlyInstallmentWeirdness Early jet technology could get a little strange]], by modern standards.strange]].



** Every jet in the game with more than one variant uses the exact same model for each one, even when later variants add or remove extra seating, switch out the engines, or the like. The sole major exceptions are the F/A-18E Super Hornet, which has the proper wider fuselage than the other Hornet variants,[[note]]appropriate, since the real Super Hornet has been described as closer to a new plane advertised as a variant for the purposes of not inviting budget scrutiny[[/note]] and the F-15 ACTIVE, which lengthens the fuselage to fit a second seat in the cockpit, but even that omits the thrust-vectoring engines the real thing has - and the game also fails to make the same modification for the F-15E that the ACTIVE was based on. The only other exceptions are when a variant of a plane adds canards, but that's the only difference, and if you look at the textures, you'll note that for most craft with canards like the Flanker family, they're lazy enough about it that canards are textured even on variants that don't have them.

to:

** Every jet in the game with more than one variant uses the exact same model for each one, even when later variants add or remove extra seating, switch out the engines, or the like. The sole major exceptions are the F/A-18E Super Hornet, which has the proper wider fuselage than the other Hornet variants,[[note]]appropriate, since the real Super Hornet has been described as closer to a new plane advertised as a variant for the purposes of not inviting budget scrutiny[[/note]] and scrutiny[[/note]], the F-15 ACTIVE, which lengthens the fuselage to fit a second seat in the cockpit, but cockpit (since you first fly it in a tutorial mission where the GuyInBack is actually acknowledge; even that then, it omits the thrust-vectoring engines the real thing has - has, and the game also fails to make the same modification for the F-15E that F-15E), and the ACTIVE was based on. Su-32 and -34, which get the widened tandem-seat cockpit and longer tail. The only other exceptions are when a variant of a plane adds canards, but that's the only difference, and if you look at the textures, you'll note that for most craft with canards canards, like the aforementioned Flanker family, they're lazy enough about it that canards are textured even on variants that don't have them.them. The game even goes overboard on this sort of thing with the Mirage V, which is accidentally programmed to use the Mirage III's texture instead of its own.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** ''VideoGame/CallOfDutyModernWarfare3'''s second mission starts with a transmission from F-22 pilots preparing for a bombing run, but the wireframe models and information on the screen, along with the planes that actually show up in the mission, are all once again F-15s. On top of that, the loadout shown for them tries to claim that an external fuel tank is a JDAM, and for the actual air strike they launch "JDAM Missiles", which A) don't exist ([=JDAMs=] are a conversion kit for unguided bombs), and B) are actually AIM-120 Sparrows, a dedicated air-to-air weapon.

to:

** ''VideoGame/CallOfDutyModernWarfare3'''s second mission starts with a transmission from F-22 pilots preparing for a bombing run, but the wireframe models and information on the screen, along with the planes that actually show up in the mission, are all once again F-15s. On top of that, the loadout shown for them tries to claim that an external fuel tank is a JDAM, and for the actual air strike they launch "JDAM Missiles", which A) don't exist ([=JDAMs=] are a conversion kit for unguided bombs), and B) are actually AIM-120 Sparrows, [=AMRAAMs=], a dedicated air-to-air weapon.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** In ''VideoGame/AceCombat2'', an F-22's thrust vectoring is shown off at one point in the intro cinematic, but its engines point in different directions during a roll, which the real F-22's engines can't actually do (their thrust-vectoring is two dimensional, and only assists with pitch). There's also the issue of it and its Su-35 wingmate taking off from an aircraft carrier when neither of them are carrier-capable.

to:

** In ''VideoGame/AceCombat2'', an F-22's thrust vectoring is shown off at one point in the intro cinematic, but its engines point in different directions during a roll, which the real F-22's engines can't actually do (their thrust-vectoring is two dimensional, and only assists with pitch). There's also the issue of it and its Su-35 wingmate taking off from an aircraft carrier when neither of them are carrier-capable.carrier-capable (nor are Russian carrier planes able to use steam catapults, since Russian carriers don't have them).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Despite [[BackedByThePentagon the support of the U.S. Military]], the 2007 ''Film/{{Transformers}}'' movie contains a number of errors. An AC-130U Spooky gunship is used to take down the Decepticon Scorponok using "105 sabot rounds". The AC-130 is armed with a 105 mm howitzer, but there is no such thing as a sabot round for this type of weapon.[[note]]The cockpit dialogue during this sequence is accurate, though, since it was an actual AC-130 crew - Creator/MichaelBay simply gave the crew the target details and rolled camera.[[/note]] Later, F-22 Raptors were used to attack the Decepticons during the final battle using laser guided air-to-ground missiles. In real life, the F-22 cannot carry any laser guided missiles; it is designed to use GPS-guided bombs for air-to-ground attacks. Also, freaking jet powered Predator. While the C variant of the Predator is jet powered, it also has substantially redesigned wings and fuselage. Putting a jet engine in a Predator B frame and putting it through the maneuvers it goes through in the movie would probably have snapped the wings off. The first scene in the film also has an army spec-ops team return to base on V-22 Ospreys but the interior shots appear to be from a CH-47 Chinook.

to:

* Despite [[BackedByThePentagon the support of the U.S. Military]], the 2007 ''Film/{{Transformers}}'' movie contains a number of errors. An AC-130U Spooky gunship is used to take down the Decepticon Scorponok using "105 sabot rounds". The AC-130 is armed with a 105 mm howitzer, but there is no such thing as a sabot round for this type of weapon.[[note]]The cockpit dialogue during this sequence is accurate, though, since it was an actual AC-130 crew - Creator/MichaelBay simply gave the crew the target details and rolled camera.camera, with the only condition being that their target is a [[OutsideContextProblem tank-sized metal scorpion]].[[/note]] Later, F-22 Raptors were used to attack the Decepticons during the final battle using laser guided air-to-ground missiles. In real life, the F-22 cannot carry any laser guided missiles; it is designed to use GPS-guided glide bombs for air-to-ground attacks. Also, freaking jet powered Predator. While the C variant of the Predator is jet powered, it also has substantially redesigned wings and fuselage. Putting a jet engine in a Predator B frame and putting it through the maneuvers it goes through in the movie would probably have snapped the wings off. The first scene in the film also has an army spec-ops team return to base on V-22 Ospreys but the interior shots appear to be from a CH-47 Chinook. On a more minor note, a lot of the military procedures shown, especially during the AC-130U scene, are on a ''massively'' condensed time-scale (it would have taken an hour at ''least'' to get all the military assets depicted on station), but this is at least somewhat understandable since, if it took a realistic time scale, Scorponok likely would have finished off the entire squad and levelled the village before the first air asset even has visual.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Army B-26s from Midway attack the Japanese fleet in a level bombing attack. Midway ''did'' contribute B-26s to the battle, however they were armed with ''torpedoes'', not bombs. There was a level bombing attack against the Japanese as well,[[note]]two, in fact: the very first action of the day unsuccessfully attacked the transports carrying the invasion force, and a second against the carriers later in the day[[/note]] however this was carried out by B-17s ([[RuleOfThree also]] entirely absent from the film).

to:

** Army B-26s from Midway attack the Japanese fleet in a level bombing attack. Midway ''did'' contribute B-26s to the battle, however they were armed with ''torpedoes'', not bombs. There was a level bombing attack against the Japanese as well,[[note]]two, in fact: the very first action of the day unsuccessfully attacked the transports carrying the invasion force, and a second against the carriers later in the day[[/note]] however this was carried out by B-17s ([[RuleOfThree also]] entirely absent from the film). Interestingly, the movie does feature a notable event involving a crashing B-26 which almost struck one of the Japanese carriers, with the captain of said carrier dismissing a sailor's question whether it was [[RammingAlwaysWorks intentional]] by saying "[[the Americans]] are not ''that'' brave," but doesn't mention the more infamous incident of the B-26, ''Suzie-Q'', which [[BuzzingTheDeck strafed the deck]] of the ''Akagi'', killing two men, and supposedly contributed to Nagumo ordering another attack on Midway instead of holding his planes in reserve for anti-ship operations as ordered.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** There's also the infamous exploding plane scene, where Jessica Biel punches out seconds before her plane explodes. Next, the pilotless-but-still-in-one-piece plane twists around and starts ''barreling after her'' (although it ''had'' been twisting around before she hit the eject). '''Then''' it explodes, and an enormous cloud of wreckage chases her down. The "LudicrousGibs" level of debris rather suggests she was carrying a Lockheed C-130 troop transport in her missile bay.

to:

** There's also the infamous exploding plane scene, where Jessica Biel punches out seconds before her plane explodes. Next, the pilotless-but-still-in-one-piece plane twists around and starts ''barreling after her'' like she insulted its mother (although it ''had'' been twisting around before she hit the eject). '''Then''' it explodes, and an enormous cloud of wreckage chases her down. The "LudicrousGibs" level of debris rather suggests she was carrying a Lockheed C-130 troop transport in her missile bay.



** Made even worse when you know that those very same maneuvers are reserved for airshows and technology demonstration, and that no competent pilot would actually be stupid enough to attempt one in an actual dogfight. Made even more worse (worser?) that they are in a dogfight at all, when both sides are equipped with Beyond Visual Range missile technology, which means dogfighting is your last resort, not your go-to strategy for an engagement. Or the fact the non-stealth Faux-37s weren't even detected until they were only 25 miles out, etc. There's also the fact that these Su-37s are shown as two-seaters, when the only two Su-37s in the real world only have room for the pilot.

to:

** Made even worse when you know that those very same maneuvers are reserved for airshows and technology demonstration, and that no competent pilot would actually be stupid enough to attempt one in an actual dogfight. Made even more worse (worser?) that they are in a dogfight at all, when both sides are equipped with Beyond Visual Range missile technology, which means dogfighting is your last resort, not your go-to strategy for an engagement. [[note]]Which is pretty much case-in-point as to why the United States isn't (as) interested in super-manuverability outside of their F-22 Raptors; sure, it makes for a good airshow, but most of their modern jet fighters are little more than advanced platforms for their missiles, which are typically what does all the maneuvering. As fun as 3D-thrust vectoring can be, the USAF just sees it as [[AwesomeButImpractical a lot of extra parts that have a low probability of actually being used to their fullest extent]] during the aircraft's service life.[[/note]] Or the fact the non-stealth Faux-37s weren't even detected until they were only 25 miles out, etc. There's also the fact that these Su-37s are shown as two-seaters, when the only two Su-37s in the real world only have room for the pilot.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Going over every other example in each film would probably double the length of the page but one of the worst is in ''Film/TransformersTheLastKnight'': before [[spoiler:the TRF go to attack the Ignition Chamber and save the Earth,]] Lennox explains how crazy their plan is by stating that the Osprey has a flight ceiling of 12,000 feet but they would be launching them from "almost double that". In reality the Osprey has a flight ceiling of 25,000 feet, perfectly capable of reaching the TRF's target. A better issue to bring would be that the Osprey would have trouble getting through the literal maze of [[spoiler:Cybertron chunks to the Ignition Chamber.]]

to:

* Going over every other example in each film would probably double the length of the page but one of the worst is in ''Film/TransformersTheLastKnight'': before [[spoiler:the TRF go to attack the Ignition Chamber and save the Earth,]] Lennox explains how crazy their plan is by stating that the Osprey has a flight ceiling of 12,000 feet but they would be launching them from "almost double that".that", requiring what is best described as a mass [[ComingInHot controlled crash-landing]] as the Ospreys ''apparently'' cannot generate enough lift at those altitudes. In reality the Osprey has a flight ceiling of 25,000 feet, perfectly capable of reaching the TRF's target. A better issue to bring would be that the Osprey would have trouble getting through the literal maze of [[spoiler:Cybertron chunks to the Ignition Chamber.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Averted in the ''[[Series/TheTwilightZone Twilight Zone]]'' episode "The Odyssey of Flight 33". Creator/RodSerling used his brother Robert, who was an aviation writer, and an airline-pilot friend as sources for the cockpit dialogue.

to:

* Averted in the ''[[Series/TheTwilightZone ''[[Series/TheTwilightZone1959 Twilight Zone]]'' episode "The Odyssey of Flight 33". Creator/RodSerling used his brother Robert, who was an aviation writer, and an airline-pilot friend as sources for the cockpit dialogue.

Added: 1269

Changed: 2

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


%%

to:

%%
[[folder:Music]]
* The video for Music/{{Sabaton}}'s [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LYI3eegIJlI "Soldier of Heaven"]] depicts first a bright red triplane [[ChasingYourTail chasing the tail]] of a biplane of indeterminate manufacture over the UsefulNotes/WorldWarI Italian Alpine battlefield where the band is performing, followed by a pair of UsefulNotes/WorldWarII Bf 109s overflying it. The latter is probably RuleOfSymbolism: the song lyrics note that the bodies of many Italian and Austro-Hungarian soldiers still lie where they fell because they couldn't be feasibly retrieved, and thus "saw" the next war fought over the same ground (although no significant fighting actually took place in that particular area in WWII because Austria was part of Italy's ally Germany). The former, though, is simply a misplaced CallBack to [[https://youtu.be/3PXzgXBRM_k "The Red Baron"]] from the previous album: the Germans weren't involved in the Alpine front and Manfred von Richthofen spent his whole flying career in France and Belgium, while the Austro-Hungarian Aviation Troops never operated any triplanes and painted their planes mostly in beige with bands of red, white, and red at the wingtips. [[JustPlaneWrong Also, the triplane's wings are too long.]]
[[/folder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The US built [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northrop_F-5 F-5E Tiger II]] stood in for [=MiGs=], just as various models of Sikorsky helicopters with wings stuck on have had to stand in for Soviet/Russian Mi-24 "Hind" gunships. And the aircraft was called a [=MiG=]-28 — no such bird exists due to naming conventions.[[note]]Mikoyan have always built fighters. Back in the Cold War days, in addition to indicating the design bureau ("[=MiG=]", "Su", "Tu", "Yak", etc.), Soviet designations made the distinction between fighters and other aircraft; odd numbers were fighters, even ones bombers and everything else (though with specialized ground attack aircraft like the Su-25, the difference did get fuzzy at times, and the iconic "Bear" four-engine heavy bomber inexplicably ended up with the Tu-95 designation, used internally by the design bureau, instead of the official Tu-20 designation issued by the Red Air Force). So there was a [=MiG-27=] and a [=MiG-29=], but no -28. There was at the time no [=MiG-33 or -35=] (the former was a WorkingTitle for the [=MiG-29, the latter a MiG-29=] variant that didn't fly until 2007), so either of these names would've been better for a fictional [=MiG=].[[/note]] This may be [[AcceptableBreaksFromReality somewhat justified]], since the alternative of calling the Tigers by the name of a ''real'' Soviet plane would arguably be worse.

to:

** The US built [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northrop_F-5 F-5E Tiger II]] stood in for [=MiGs=], just as various models of Sikorsky helicopters with wings stuck on have had to stand in for Soviet/Russian Mi-24 "Hind" gunships. And the aircraft was called a [=MiG=]-28 — no such bird exists due to naming conventions.[[note]]Mikoyan have always built fighters. Back in the Cold War days, in addition to indicating the design bureau ("[=MiG=]", "Su", "Tu", "Yak", etc.), Soviet designations made the distinction between fighters and other aircraft; odd numbers were fighters, even ones bombers and everything else (though with specialized ground attack aircraft like the Su-25, the difference did get fuzzy at times, and the iconic "Bear" four-engine heavy bomber inexplicably ended up with the Tu-95 designation, used internally by the design bureau, instead of the official Tu-20 designation issued by the Red Air Force). So there was a [=MiG-27=] and a [=MiG-29=], but no -28. There was at the time no [=MiG-33 or -35=] (the former was a WorkingTitle for the [=MiG-29, the latter a MiG-29=] variant that didn't fly until 2007), so either of these names would've been better for a fictional [=MiG=].[[/note]] Additionally, there were no fixed-wing Soviet naval aircraft in service at the time other than the Yak-38, an underpowered Harrier knock-off.[[note]]It was supposed to just be a technology demonstrator for VTOL but Soviet Premier Leonid Brezhnev ordered it built as a production fighter for no adequately explained reason.[[/note]] This may be [[AcceptableBreaksFromReality somewhat justified]], since the alternative of calling the Tigers by the name of a ''real'' Soviet plane would arguably be worse. worse--though one plane that ''could'' have been used here would have been the Soviet Air Force [=MiG-29=], which kind of looks like an F-15 if you squint.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Played straight in most of ''Franchise/StarWarsLegends'' but noticeably averted in the ''Literature/XWingSeries''. Rebel Alliance and New Republic fighters have significant advantages over Imperial TIE models in atmospheric combat because, being shaped relatively more like real-world aircraft, they're capable of aerodynamic maneuvering where [=TIEs=] very much are not.

Added: 2926

Changed: 5

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Film/{{Midway|1976}}'':

to:

* ''Film/{{Midway|1976}}'':''Film/Midway1976'':


Added DiffLines:

* ''Film/Midway2019'':
** Very few of the [=B5N=] torpedo/level bombers used by the Japanese were armed, carrying only a flexible gun for defense. However they are shown joining the Zero fighters strafing the American fleet at Pearl Harbor.
** Two important aircraft from the battle are missing entirely:
*** The Japanese [=D3A=] "Val" dive bombers, which were used extensively at Pearl Harbor and Midway, including causing severe damage to ''Yorktown'' in the first wave of ''Hiryū'''s counterattack. They briefly appear for a few seconds during the Pearl Harbor attack scene (the fixed landing gear gives them away), but they never appear afterward.
*** More egregious is lack of the American [=F4F=] Wildcat fighters. As much as the devastating blow to the Japanese fleet, Midway was important as a turning point for the Navy's fighter pilots, as it was the first opportunity for Thach to use what would become the Thach Weave in a major combat with the Japanese.
** Doolittle's raiders are shown flying B-25Js. This later model was distinguished by the top turret having been moved forward directly behind the cockpit. The historical Raiders flew the earlier B-25B, which had the dorsal turret located much further aft.
** Dick Best's Dauntless is accurately painted with the number B1 and two diagonal white stripes on the vertical stabilizer, as shown in [[http://fineartofdecalsimages.s3.amazonaws.com/SBD-3B1LS.jpg this]] color plate. The other ''Enterprise'' [=SBDs=] and [=TBDs=] show a similar marking scheme (such as Scouting Six's Dauntlesses using an S# fuselage number). However this was only the aircraft's markings ''at the time of Midway'', but is used throughout the film. As shown [[http://www.clubhyper.com/reference/images/coralseasbd_1.jpg here]], from 1941 through May, 1942, US Navy aircraft featured red and white stripes on the rudder, and red disks in the middle of the roundel. The red was removed to reduce the chance of American gunners mistaking the red disk for the Japanese ''Hinomaru'', (aka, the "Meatball") and prevent friendly fire incidents. Additionally, ''Enterprise'''s air wing adopted comically oversized national insignia for the first few months of the war as a result of the loss of several aircraft and their crews to friendly fire when they arrived at Pearl Harbor in the aftermath of the attack. None of the aircraft in the film are shown with these early markings.
** Army B-26s from Midway attack the Japanese fleet in a level bombing attack. Midway ''did'' contribute B-26s to the battle, however they were armed with ''torpedoes'', not bombs. There was a level bombing attack against the Japanese as well,[[note]]two, in fact: the very first action of the day unsuccessfully attacked the transports carrying the invasion force, and a second against the carriers later in the day[[/note]] however this was carried out by B-17s ([[RuleOfThree also]] entirely absent from the film).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** During the same scene, the terrorist trying to get AF1 back in the air is steering around Ramstein by turning the yoke like a steering wheel. Airplanes move on their horizontal axis by pushing foot pedals. If turning the yoke like that would have actually worked, the wings would have smacked the ground.

to:

** During the same scene, the terrorist trying to get AF1 [=AF1=] back in the air is steering around Ramstein by turning the yoke like a steering wheel. Airplanes move on their horizontal axis by pushing foot pedals. If turning the yoke like that would have actually worked, the wings would have smacked the ground.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** ''ForYourEyesOnly'' has a minor example. In the opening James Bond flies a helicopter with both hands on the same stick, a so-called cyclic stick (for directional control). He would need one hand to operate the collective/throttle lever. (Averted later on: contrary to most Cold War movies, the helicopter that transports General Gogol is an actual Polish-made MiL Mi-6, accurate for a Russian general in the early 1980s.)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[caption-width-right:350:Concorde, X-Wing, what the hell's the difference?]]


to:

[[caption-width-right:350:Concorde, X-Wing, Su-27, what the hell's the difference?]]

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Like ''Ace Combat'', the planes are all given ludicrous amounts of missiles (this time the absolute minimum is about 88, flying a "Low Payload" craft on the highest difficulty which cuts missile counts) that can target both fast-movers and stationary ground installations. The second game still gives planes at least three-fourths of a full ton worth of missiles, but the default ones are now explicitly-labeled "Heat-Seeking Missiles" that can only target other aircraft.

to:

** Like ''Ace Combat'', the planes are all given ludicrous amounts of missiles (this time the absolute minimum is about 88, flying a "Low Payload" craft on the highest difficulty which cuts missile counts) counts, which as of 2022 is still four times as many as the most heavily-armed proposals can carry) that can target both fast-movers and stationary ground installations. The second game still gives planes at least three-fourths of a full ton worth of missiles, but the default ones are now explicitly-labeled "Heat-Seeking Missiles" that can only target other aircraft.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In ''Film/TheDayTheEarthStoodStill2008'', the "sphere" and robot sitting in Central Park are attacked by Predator [=UCAVs=], armed with Sidewinder air-to-air missiles and Hellfire anti-armor missiles, said [=UCAVs=] being flown by U.S. Army operators. First of all, the Army doesn't fly Predators[[note]]The US Army did actually fly the MQ-1C variant, called Grey Eagle or Sky Warrior[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Atomics_MQ-1C_Gray_Eagle]][[/note]], they belong to the U.S. Air Force (and the CIA, but we don't talk about that). Second, when the order to launch is given, the operators fire the Sidewinders, which are infra-red homing air-to-air missiles with relatively small annular blast-fragmentation warheads intended to shred fighter aircraft like a duck hit by birdshot. Not only are such light warheads useless against what is pretty obviously a pair of heavily-armored targets, they aren't generating enough heat to let the missiles' infra-red guidance systems lock on to them to begin with. In such a situation, the Sidewinder will "go dumb", and probably miss, and even if it hits, it won't accomplish much. And since the operators were supposed to be from the Army, you'd think they'd know enough to use the Hellfires, which are ''intended'' for use on heavily-armored ground targets (like tanks, for instance) when shooting at the equivalent of a small warship.

to:

* In ''Film/TheDayTheEarthStoodStill2008'', the "sphere" and robot sitting in Central Park are attacked by Predator [=UCAVs=], armed with Sidewinder air-to-air missiles and Hellfire anti-armor missiles, said [=UCAVs=] being flown by U.S. Army operators. First of all, the Army doesn't fly Predators[[note]]The US Army did actually fly flies the MQ-1C variant, called Grey Eagle or Sky Warrior[[https://en.[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Atomics_MQ-1C_Gray_Eagle]][[/note]], org/wiki/General_Atomics_MQ-1C_Gray_Eagle MQ-1C]] variant, called the Grey Eagle or Sky Warrior, which has minor physical differences[[/note]], they belong to the U.S. Air Force (and the CIA, but we don't talk about that). Second, when the order to launch is given, the operators fire the Sidewinders, which are infra-red homing air-to-air missiles with relatively small annular blast-fragmentation warheads intended to shred fighter aircraft like a duck hit by birdshot. Not only are such light warheads useless against what is pretty obviously a pair of heavily-armored targets, they aren't generating enough heat to let the missiles' infra-red guidance systems lock on to them to begin with. In such a situation, the Sidewinder will "go dumb", and probably miss, and even if it hits, it won't accomplish much. And since the operators were supposed to be from the Army, you'd think they'd know enough to use the Hellfires, which are ''intended'' for use on heavily-armored ground targets (like tanks, for instance) when shooting at the equivalent of a small warship.



** The [=Me-262s=] like the one flown by Pretty Boy during the final battle were armed with four [=30mm=] cannon, firing explosive shells. [[spoiler: If Lightning had been hit by even ''one'' of those rounds in RealLife he would have been turned into a [[PinkMist red smear all over his cockpit]], much less the dozen or so that fatally wounded him in the movie]].

to:

** The [=Me-262s=] like the one flown by Pretty Boy during the final battle were armed with four [=30mm=] cannon, firing explosive shells. [[spoiler: If Lightning had been hit by even ''one'' of those rounds in RealLife he would have been turned into a [[PinkMist [[LudicrousGibs red smear all over his cockpit]], much less the dozen or so that fatally wounded him in the movie]].



* The CGI flying sequences were were spot on, but the scriptwriters for The Aviator (2004) just used random aviation terms in any dialogue between Howard Hughes and Odie. Interwar-era biplanes did not produce reverse thrust, for example.
* In ''Film/BattlefieldEarth'', the heroes find a hangar full of Harriers, all of which aren't used for a '''millennium'''. Nothing should be working after about a millennium, it takes years, not weeks to learn to fly a plane, none of them have flight-suits and yet they're all stunt dogfighter material. On the positive side, they ''do'' mention that Harrier jets can hover. Note that Harriers are so unreliable that the fact that they can even be repaired is implausible.

to:

* The CGI flying sequences were were spot on, but the scriptwriters for The Aviator (2004) ''Film/TheAviator'' just used random aviation terms in any dialogue between Howard Hughes and Odie. Interwar-era biplanes did not produce reverse thrust, for example.
* In ''Film/BattlefieldEarth'', the heroes find a hangar full of Harriers, all of which aren't used for a '''millennium'''. Nothing should be working after about a millennium, it takes years, years and not weeks to learn to fly a plane, plane (much less a VTOL-capable plane like the Harrier, which got trainees killed at a rather regular pace), none of them have flight-suits and yet they're all stunt dogfighter material. On the positive side, they ''do'' mention that Harrier jets can hover. Note that Harriers are so unreliable that the fact that they can even be repaired is implausible.



* In the film ''The Guns of Navarone'':

to:

* In the film ''The Guns of Navarone'':''Literature/TheGunsOfNavarone'':

Changed: 1703

Removed: 1199

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** One scene features a prototype "Skyfleet S570", possibly intended as a BlandNameProduct version of the then-new Airbus A380. The actual plane we see, however, is obviously a Boeing 747 with external fuel tanks hanging from the wings (specifically, it's the decommissioned 747 that lives on the ''Series/TopGear'' test track). This makes very little sense for any civilian aircraft.

to:

*** One scene features a prototype "Skyfleet S570", possibly intended as a BlandNameProduct version of the then-new Airbus A380. The actual plane we see, however, is obviously a Boeing 747 with external fuel tanks hanging from the wings (specifically, it's the decommissioned 747 that lives on the ''Series/TopGear'' test track). This track) with external fuel tanks hanging from the wings, which makes very little sense for any civilian aircraft.



** If you freeze-frame during the part of the final battle when all the fighter planes are forming up, you can see a couple of Harriers, A-10s and F-16s in the mix, however that's the only time you ever see them and they're way in the background. They only budgeted for one extreme-detail fighter CG-model. Guess which one? Yup. The F/A-18. That's why there was such a fuckload of just those for the finale.
** The number of F/A-18s flying in the final battle was more than have ever existed at any time in history. And this was ''after'' the aliens shot down the entire first counterattack earlier in the movie.
** The novelization is a little more realistic in this department. Eagle squadron (the one the president commands) is formed of F-15s found stored at a "satellite" base part of the {{Area 51}} complex. They are in a grave state of disrepair and several have to be cannibalized to make the others flightworthy, so that only about 8 fly in the actual battle. The rest of the force is formed from what ever they can find, including Russian fighters (acquired through various means during the UsefulNotes/ColdWar for study at Area 51, TruthInTelevision actually), and even UsefulNotes/WorldWarII fighters (a P-51 is mentioned). During the battle the planes are split into two groups: the shooters, modern American planes, and the decoys, Russian and other planes for which ammunition did not exist on base. The latter group was meant to go in first and [[HeroicSacrifice attract the attention of the alien fighters and draw them off]], allowing the former group to close in and open fire.

to:

** If you freeze-frame during the part of the final battle when all the fighter planes are forming up, you can see a couple of Harriers, A-10s and F-16s in the mix, however that's the only time you ever see them and they're way in the background. They only budgeted for one extreme-detail fighter CG-model. Guess CG-model, which one? Yup. The was the F/A-18. That's why there was such a fuckload of just those for the finale.
** The number of F/A-18s flying in the final battle was more
(more than than have ever existed at existedat any time point in history. And this was history, even ''after'' the aliens shot down the entire first counterattack earlier in the movie.
movie) for the finale.
** The novelization is a little more realistic in this department. Eagle squadron (the one the president President commands) is formed of F-15s found stored at a "satellite" base that's part of the {{Area 51}} complex. They are in a grave state of disrepair and several have to be cannibalized to make the others flightworthy, so that only about 8 fly in the actual battle. The rest of the force is formed from what ever they can find, including Russian fighters (acquired through various means during the UsefulNotes/ColdWar for study at Area 51, TruthInTelevision actually), and even UsefulNotes/WorldWarII fighters (a P-51 is mentioned). During the battle the planes are split into two groups: the shooters, modern American planes, and the decoys, Russian and other planes for which weapons and ammunition did not exist on base. The latter group was meant to go in first and first, [[HeroicSacrifice attract the attention of the alien fighters and draw them off]], allowing the former group to close in and open fire.



** The attack on the alien ship with [=AMRAAMs=] and Sidewinders in itself is another example, considering the sheer size of the target. Even the biggest air-to-air missiles in reality only have a 75-kilogram warhead - not much threat to a ship the size of a city. Air-to-ground weapons are closer to 500 kilos... or since the F/A-18 is cleared for the whole gamut of US Navy aircraft weapons, they could have led with something even ''[[NukeEm bigger]]''. Not that this would really have helped, since [[SciFiWritersHaveNoSenseOfScale the entire nuclear arsenal of the world could only vaporise less than 1% of the volume of one of the saucers]].
*** Never mind the question of whether or not the missiles' guidance systems (programmed to look for airplanes) could actually recognize the damn thing as a target to be engaged rather than a mountain to be avoided.

to:

** The attack on the alien ship with [=AMRAAMs=] and Sidewinders in itself is another example, considering the sheer size of the target. Even the biggest air-to-air missiles in reality only have a 75-kilogram warhead - not much threat to a ship the size of a city. Air-to-ground weapons are closer to 500 kilos... or since the F/A-18 is cleared for the whole gamut of US Navy aircraft weapons, they could have led with something even ''[[NukeEm bigger]]''. Not that this would really have helped, since supposedly [[SciFiWritersHaveNoSenseOfScale the entire nuclear arsenal of the world could only vaporise less than 1% of the volume of one of the saucers]].
*** Never mind
saucers]]. There's also the question of whether or not the missiles' guidance systems (programmed to look for airplanes) could actually recognize the damn thing as a target to be engaged rather than a mountain to be avoided.



** The film was made with essentially no special-effects budget. One effect of this is that flying scenes are done with whatever StockFootage they could get their hands on. It's common for airplanes to change model in mid-flight; the most JustForFun/{{egregious}} example is an airplane that makes its landing approach as single-engine propeller-driven SBD Dauntless dive-bomber, but crashes onto the carrier's flight deck as a single-engine jet fighter (a [=McDonnell=] Banshee).
** Other aircraft that appear in the film but are completely out of place are [=F6F=] Hellcats frequently shown in place of the [=F4F=] Wildcats actually flown by the Navy and Marines during the time of the battle, FM-2s (a license-built, late-war variant of the Wildcat first appearing in 1944) for hangar and flight deck scenes, a SBD Dauntless turns into a [=F4U=] Corsair in the middle of a bombing run, and a TBD Devastator (actually depicted by a [=SB2U=] Vindicator) turns into a TBM Avenger and in the next shot becomes another Hellcat. Almost all of the Japanese aircraft in the film were the same modified T-6 trainers used as WeaponsUnderstudies for ''Film/ToraToraTora'' a few years earlier. All the scenes of TBD Devastators and SBD Dauntlesses flying in formation are actually [=SB2U=] Vindicators.
* Despite [[BackedByThePentagon the support of the U.S. Military]], the 2007 ''Film/{{Transformers}}'' movie contains a number of errors. An AC-130U Spooky gunship is used to take down the Decepticon Scorponok using "105 sabot rounds". The AC-130 is armed with a 105 mm howitzer, but there is no such thing as a sabot round for this type of weapon.[[note]]The cockpit dialogue during this sequence is accurate, though, since it was an actual AC-130 crew - Creator/MichaelBay simply gave the crew the target details and rolled camera.[[/note]] Later, F-22 Raptors were used to attack the Decepticons during the final battle using laser guided air-to-ground missiles. In real life, the F-22 cannot carry any laser guided missiles; it is designed to use GPS-guided bombs for air-to-ground attacks. Also, freaking jet powered Predator. While the C variant of the Predator is jet powered, it also has substantially redesigned wings and fuselage. Putting a jet engine in a Predator B frame and putting it through the maneuvers in the movie would probably have snapped the wings off. The first scene in the film also has an army spec-ops team return to base on V-22 Ospreys but the interior shots appear to be from a CH-47 Chinook.
* Going over every other example in each film would probably double the length of the page but one of the worst is in ''Film/TransformersTheLastKnight'' before [[spoiler: The TRF go attack the Ignition Chamber and therefore save the Earth]] Lennox explains the Osprey has a flight ceiling of 12,000 ft but they launching them from "almost double that" when bringing how crazy their plan is. In reality the Osprey has a flight ceiling 25,000 ft - perfectly capable of reaching the TRF's target. A better issue to bring would be that the Osprey would have trouble getting through the literal maze of [[spoiler: Cybertron chunks to the Ignition Chamber.]]

to:

** The film was made with essentially no special-effects budget. One effect of this is that flying scenes are done with whatever StockFootage they could get their hands on. It's common for airplanes to change model in mid-flight; the most JustForFun/{{egregious}} example is an airplane that makes its landing approach as single-engine a engine propeller-driven SBD Dauntless dive-bomber, but crashes onto the carrier's flight deck as a single-engine jet fighter (a [=McDonnell=] Banshee).
Banshee jet fighter.
** Other aircraft that appear in the film but are completely out of place are [=F6F=] Hellcats frequently shown in place of the [=F4F=] Wildcats actually flown by the Navy and Marines during the time of the battle, FM-2s (a license-built, late-war variant of the Wildcat first appearing in 1944) for hangar and flight deck scenes, a different SBD Dauntless turns into a [=F4U=] Corsair in the middle of a bombing run, and a TBD Devastator (actually depicted by a [=SB2U=] Vindicator) turns into a TBM Avenger and in the next shot becomes another Hellcat. Almost all of the Japanese aircraft in the film were the same modified T-6 trainers used as WeaponsUnderstudies for ''Film/ToraToraTora'' a few years earlier. All the scenes of TBD Devastators and SBD Dauntlesses flying in formation are actually [=SB2U=] Vindicators.
* Despite [[BackedByThePentagon the support of the U.S. Military]], the 2007 ''Film/{{Transformers}}'' movie contains a number of errors. An AC-130U Spooky gunship is used to take down the Decepticon Scorponok using "105 sabot rounds". The AC-130 is armed with a 105 mm howitzer, but there is no such thing as a sabot round for this type of weapon.[[note]]The cockpit dialogue during this sequence is accurate, though, since it was an actual AC-130 crew - Creator/MichaelBay simply gave the crew the target details and rolled camera.[[/note]] Later, F-22 Raptors were used to attack the Decepticons during the final battle using laser guided air-to-ground missiles. In real life, the F-22 cannot carry any laser guided missiles; it is designed to use GPS-guided bombs for air-to-ground attacks. Also, freaking jet powered Predator. While the C variant of the Predator is jet powered, it also has substantially redesigned wings and fuselage. Putting a jet engine in a Predator B frame and putting it through the maneuvers it goes through in the movie would probably have snapped the wings off. The first scene in the film also has an army spec-ops team return to base on V-22 Ospreys but the interior shots appear to be from a CH-47 Chinook.
* Going over every other example in each film would probably double the length of the page but one of the worst is in ''Film/TransformersTheLastKnight'' ''Film/TransformersTheLastKnight'': before [[spoiler: The [[spoiler:the TRF go to attack the Ignition Chamber and therefore save the Earth]] Earth,]] Lennox explains how crazy their plan is by stating that the Osprey has a flight ceiling of 12,000 ft feet but they would be launching them from "almost double that" when bringing how crazy their plan is. that". In reality the Osprey has a flight ceiling of 25,000 ft - feet, perfectly capable of reaching the TRF's target. A better issue to bring would be that the Osprey would have trouble getting through the literal maze of [[spoiler: Cybertron [[spoiler:Cybertron chunks to the Ignition Chamber.]]

Added: 1352

Changed: 575

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Series/{{Mayday}}'' has a tendency to fall into this as well. One example is in the episode "Bomb on Board", which recycles the same clip for taking off and landing ''with the thrust reversers deployed.'' Another episode about the Tenerife disaster, which involved a collision between two 747s, Pan Am and KLM, introduces the KLM plane with a shot of it in flight... with winglets, identifying it as a 747-400, which would not be in production until 11 years after the disaster in 1977. In another episode, it is made clear that the people making the show believe that any twinjet in an American Airlines livery must be an A300.

to:

* ''Series/{{Mayday}}'' has a tendency to fall into this as well. this.
**
One example is in the episode "Bomb on Board", which recycles the same clip for taking off and landing ''with the thrust reversers deployed.'' ''
**
Another episode about the Tenerife disaster, which involved a collision between two 747s, Pan Am and KLM, introduces the KLM plane with a shot of it in flight... with winglets, identifying it as a 747-400, which would not be in production until 11 years after the disaster in 1977. 1977.
**
In another episode, it is made clear that the people making the show believe that any twinjet in an American Airlines livery must be an A300.A300.
** The above is averted in the episode about American Airlines Flight 587, which actually did involve an A300, but instead it goofs in showing the plane pitching downward when it loses its vertical stabilizer; in real life, losing the vertical stabilizer (i.e. the part of the tail that points straight upwards) causes uncontrollable movements in the ''yaw'' axis, as in the plane wants to drift from side-to-side like how a car turns. It's both baffling, in that the episode about the Uberlingen disaster correctly showed the effects of losing the vertical stabilizer, but also darkly amusing, in that this trope (specifically, training pilots to dangerously overreact to the wake turbulence that caused the vertical stabilizer to separate) contributed to the real AA 587 crash.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The "Creator/JRRTolkien, Jr., Jr." sketch in ''WesternAnimation/RobotChicken'' has one scene in which the protagonists fly F-14 jets, but Gandalf refers to them as F-16s, which isn't even getting into [[AnachronismStew/WesternAnimation fighter jets in Middle-Earth in the first place]]. Justified in that the whole sketch is supposed to be a sneak peek at the movie adaptation of a half-finished ''Literature/TheLordOfTheRings'' sequel [[MakesJustAsMuchSenseInContext as completed by Tolkien's six-year-old grandson]], a six-year-old being exactly the sort of person who would assume "F-16" is shorthand for "awesome jet that does anything"... not to mention be responsible for the ''rest'' of [[MindScrew the weirdness in that sketch]].

to:

* The "Creator/JRRTolkien, Jr., Jr." sketch in ''WesternAnimation/RobotChicken'' has one scene in which the protagonists fly F-14 jets, but Gandalf refers to them as F-16s, which isn't even getting into [[AnachronismStew/WesternAnimation [[AnachronismStew fighter jets in Middle-Earth in the first place]]. Justified in that the whole sketch is supposed to be a sneak peek at the movie adaptation of a half-finished ''Literature/TheLordOfTheRings'' sequel [[MakesJustAsMuchSenseInContext as completed by Tolkien's six-year-old grandson]], a six-year-old being exactly the sort of person who would assume "F-16" is shorthand for "awesome jet that does anything"... not to mention be responsible for the ''rest'' of [[MindScrew the weirdness in that sketch]].



* In the ''WesternAnimation/PhineasAndFerb'' episode [[Recap/PhineasAndFerbDePlaneDePlane "De Plane! De Plane!"]], Phineas and Ferb built a giant papier-mache plane, which takes off by... tilting upward and then immediately shooting up into the sky, without building up any speed first. They didn't even build a runway.

to:

* In the ''WesternAnimation/PhineasAndFerb'' episode [[Recap/PhineasAndFerbDePlaneDePlane "De Plane! De Plane!"]], Phineas and Ferb P&F built a giant papier-mache plane, which takes off by... tilting upward and then immediately shooting up into the sky, without building up any speed first. They didn't even build a runway.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
I'd say not wanting to spend a considerable amount of money recreating an F-14 crash using early CGI is pretty understandable.


* In the film version of ''Film/TheHuntForRedOctober'', Robby Jackson's crash is changed rather significantly from the book, becoming only a very minor point with an entirely different cause. That's understandable given the movie's time constraints; less understandable is the use of StockFootage to depict the crash of an F-14 Tomcat on a modern carrier... stock footage that shows the UsefulNotes/KoreanWar crash of an [=F9F=] Panther on a straight-deck carrier. Oi vey.

to:

* In the film version of ''Film/TheHuntForRedOctober'', Robby Jackson's crash is changed rather significantly from the book, becoming only a very minor point with an entirely different cause. That's understandable given the movie's time constraints; less understandable is the use of StockFootage to depict the crash of an F-14 Tomcat on is depicted using StockFootage of an F9F Panther from the UsefulNotes/KoreanWar. The crash being presented through a modern carrier... stock low-resolution CRT monitor and the footage that shows focusing on the UsefulNotes/KoreanWar crash of an [=F9F=] Panther on a straight-deck carrier. Oi vey.aircraft's burning nose section tumbling across the deck somewhat helps obfuscate this, but if you pay attention during the first second or so it becomes obvious.

Added: 503

Changed: 79

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In the ''Literature/{{Animorphs}}'' book "The Deception", Ax (in a human morph) uses an F-14 fighter carrying a nuclear bomb to threaten the Yeerks. The F-14 isn't, and never was, capable of carrying nuclear weapons-- it was developed as an interceptor, and it was only late in its career that it gained the ability to carry any bombs at all.



* Creator/DanBrown committed an especially JustForFun/{{egregious}} one of these in ''Literature/AngelsAndDemons'' when portraying Robert Langdon's transatlantic flight in a "Boeing X-33". In RealLife, the X-33 project never produced a working prototype, but even if it ''had'' done so, the X-33 was unmanned, too small to accommodate any payload at all, let-alone adequate life-support, and was built not by Boeing, but by their arch-rival Lockheed-Martin. While straying from factual accuracy in ''Literature/TheDaVinciCode'' could be chalked up to ArtisticLicenseHistory, the aviation inaccuracies here really can't be called anything short of CriticalResearchFailure.

to:

* Creator/DanBrown committed an especially JustForFun/{{egregious}} one of these in ''Literature/AngelsAndDemons'' when portraying Robert Langdon's transatlantic flight in a "Boeing X-33". In RealLife, the X-33 project never produced a working prototype, but even if it ''had'' done so, the X-33 was unmanned, too small to accommodate any payload at all, let-alone adequate life-support, and was built not by Boeing, but by their arch-rival Lockheed-Martin. While straying from factual accuracy in ''Literature/TheDaVinciCode'' could be chalked up to ArtisticLicenseHistory, the aviation inaccuracies here really can't be called anything short of CriticalResearchFailure.this trope.



** In ''Scarecrow'', a French Harrier is hit by a truck, after hovering like a gunship. There is no external damage, but it blows up a few seconds later.

to:

** In ''Scarecrow'', a French Harrier is hit by a truck, after hovering like a gunship. There is no external damage, but it blows up a few seconds later. Not only that, but France doesn't have Harriers.


Added DiffLines:

* ''Literature/TheFungus'' was written in 1985 and is set TwentyMinutesIntoTheFuture, but features a Tu-144, which was withdrawn from airline service in 1979.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In ''Film/TheDayTheEarthStoodStill2008'', the "sphere" and robot sitting in Central Park are attacked by Predator [=UCAVs=], armed with Sidewinder air-to-air missiles and Hellfire anti-armor missiles, said [=UCAVs=] being flown by U.S. Army operators. First of all, the Army doesn't fly Predators[[Note]]The US Army did actually fly the MQ-1C variant, called Grey Eagle or Sky Warrior[[/Note]], they belong to the U.S. Air Force (and the CIA, but we don't talk about that). Second, when the order to launch is given, the operators fire the Sidewinders, which are infra-red homing air-to-air missiles with relatively small annular blast-fragmentation warheads intended to shred fighter aircraft like a duck hit by birdshot. Not only are such light warheads useless against what is pretty obviously a pair of heavily-armored targets, they aren't generating enough heat to let the missiles' infra-red guidance systems lock on to them to begin with. In such a situation, the Sidewinder will "go dumb", and probably miss, and even if it hits, it won't accomplish much. And since the operators were supposed to be from the Army, you'd think they'd know enough to use the Hellfires, which are ''intended'' for use on heavily-armored ground targets (like tanks, for instance) when shooting at the equivalent of a small warship.

to:

* In ''Film/TheDayTheEarthStoodStill2008'', the "sphere" and robot sitting in Central Park are attacked by Predator [=UCAVs=], armed with Sidewinder air-to-air missiles and Hellfire anti-armor missiles, said [=UCAVs=] being flown by U.S. Army operators. First of all, the Army doesn't fly Predators[[Note]]The Predators[[note]]The US Army did actually fly the MQ-1C variant, called Grey Eagle or Sky Warrior[[/Note]], Warrior[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Atomics_MQ-1C_Gray_Eagle]][[/note]], they belong to the U.S. Air Force (and the CIA, but we don't talk about that). Second, when the order to launch is given, the operators fire the Sidewinders, which are infra-red homing air-to-air missiles with relatively small annular blast-fragmentation warheads intended to shred fighter aircraft like a duck hit by birdshot. Not only are such light warheads useless against what is pretty obviously a pair of heavily-armored targets, they aren't generating enough heat to let the missiles' infra-red guidance systems lock on to them to begin with. In such a situation, the Sidewinder will "go dumb", and probably miss, and even if it hits, it won't accomplish much. And since the operators were supposed to be from the Army, you'd think they'd know enough to use the Hellfires, which are ''intended'' for use on heavily-armored ground targets (like tanks, for instance) when shooting at the equivalent of a small warship.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In ''Film/TheDayTheEarthStoodStill2008'', the "sphere" and robot sitting in Central Park are attacked by Predator [=UCAVs=], armed with Sidewinder air-to-air missiles and Hellfire anti-armor missiles, said [=UCAVs=] being flown by U.S. Army operators. First of all, the Army doesn't fly Predators, they belong to the U.S. Air Force (and the CIA, but we don't talk about that). Second, when the order to launch is given, the operators fire the Sidewinders, which are infra-red homing air-to-air missiles with relatively small annular blast-fragmentation warheads intended to shred fighter aircraft like a duck hit by birdshot. Not only are such light warheads useless against what is pretty obviously a pair of heavily-armored targets, they aren't generating enough heat to let the missiles' infra-red guidance systems lock on to them to begin with. In such a situation, the Sidewinder will "go dumb", and probably miss, and even if it hits, it won't accomplish much. And since the operators were supposed to be from the Army, you'd think they'd know enough to use the Hellfires, which are ''intended'' for use on heavily-armored ground targets (like tanks, for instance) when shooting at the equivalent of a small warship.

to:

* In ''Film/TheDayTheEarthStoodStill2008'', the "sphere" and robot sitting in Central Park are attacked by Predator [=UCAVs=], armed with Sidewinder air-to-air missiles and Hellfire anti-armor missiles, said [=UCAVs=] being flown by U.S. Army operators. First of all, the Army doesn't fly Predators, Predators[[Note]]The US Army did actually fly the MQ-1C variant, called Grey Eagle or Sky Warrior[[/Note]], they belong to the U.S. Air Force (and the CIA, but we don't talk about that). Second, when the order to launch is given, the operators fire the Sidewinders, which are infra-red homing air-to-air missiles with relatively small annular blast-fragmentation warheads intended to shred fighter aircraft like a duck hit by birdshot. Not only are such light warheads useless against what is pretty obviously a pair of heavily-armored targets, they aren't generating enough heat to let the missiles' infra-red guidance systems lock on to them to begin with. In such a situation, the Sidewinder will "go dumb", and probably miss, and even if it hits, it won't accomplish much. And since the operators were supposed to be from the Army, you'd think they'd know enough to use the Hellfires, which are ''intended'' for use on heavily-armored ground targets (like tanks, for instance) when shooting at the equivalent of a small warship.

Added: 1418

Changed: 1905

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** ''VideoGame/ModernWarfare 2'' falls into this trap by showing F-15Cs in "The Gulag" mission but later referring to the Navy as bombing the gulag. The Navy uses F/A-18s and eventually will use F-35s for combat missions.[[note]]Ironically, this mission is clearly influenced by ''Film/TheRock'', and yet it makes the exact opposite error that movie does.[[/note]] Apparently the developers didn't want to bother modeling another aircraft. It's also rather sad considering ''Call of Duty 4'' correctly showed the Marines getting their air support from [=SuperCobras=] and Harriers - except in multiplayer, where again the F-15 carries out both their airstrikes and those of the SAS. A lesser goof is that the launching of AGM-88 [=HARMs=], which no F-15 variant is compatible with, is announced with a call of "Fox Three", which is the brevity code for ''air-to-air, active radar-guided'' missiles. An anti-radiation air-to-ground missile would be fired with a call of "Magnum".

to:

** ''VideoGame/ModernWarfare 2'' ''VideoGame/CallOfDutyModernWarfare2'' falls into this trap by showing F-15Cs in "The Gulag" mission but later referring to the Navy as bombing the gulag. The Navy uses F/A-18s and eventually will use F-35s for combat missions.[[note]]Ironically, this mission is clearly influenced by ''Film/TheRock'', and yet it makes the exact opposite error that movie does.[[/note]] Apparently the developers didn't want to bother modeling another aircraft. It's also rather sad considering ''Call ''VideoGame/{{Call of Duty 4'' 4|ModernWarfare}}'' correctly showed the Marines getting their air support from [=SuperCobras=] and Harriers - except in multiplayer, where again the F-15 carries out both their airstrikes and those of the SAS. A lesser goof is that the launching of AGM-88 [=HARMs=], which no F-15 variant is compatible with, is announced with a call of "Fox Three", which is the brevity code for ''air-to-air, active radar-guided'' missiles. An anti-radiation air-to-ground missile would be fired with a call of "Magnum".



** ''VideoGame/CallOfDutyBlackOps'' has U-2 spyplanes in multiplayer, which can be hit from the ground with small-arms fire. The actual U-2s were designed specifically to fly so high that then-existing anti-aircraft weaponry couldn't reach them. There is no in-game justification for why they would be flying so low, it's pure game balance. It also features both NPC and player-controlled Hind gunships in Vietnam in 1968, a full year and a half before its first flight and four years before it entered military service, [[AnachronismStew but that's one of the lesser anachronisms in this game.]] A less noticeable but even more anachronistic goof is that the in-game Hind also has a missile warning system for when enemies acquire a lock with a missile launcher, and an automated countermeasure system to redirect the first such missile fired at it; the real craft didn't have such systems until they started losing a handful of Hinds to Mujahideen fighters utilizing Stinger missiles partway through the UsefulNotes/SovietInvasionOfAfghanistan almost two decades later.
** ''Modern Warfare 3'''s second mission starts with a transmission from F-22 pilots preparing for a bombing run, but the wireframe models and information on the screen, along with the planes that actually show up in the mission, are all once again F-15s. On top of that, the loadout shown for them tries to claim that an external fuel tank is a JDAM, and for the actual air strike they launch "JDAM Missiles", which A) don't exist ([=JDAMs=] are a conversion kit for unguided bombs), and B) are actually AIM-120 Sparrows, a dedicated air-to-air weapon.

to:

** ''VideoGame/CallOfDutyBlackOps'' has U-2 spyplanes in multiplayer, which can be hit from the ground with small-arms fire. The actual U-2s were designed specifically to fly so high that then-existing anti-aircraft weaponry couldn't reach them. There is no in-game justification for why they would be flying so low, it's pure game balance. balance.
***
It also features both NPC and player-controlled Hind gunships in Vietnam in 1968, a full year and a half before its first flight and four years before it entered military service, [[AnachronismStew but that's one of the lesser anachronisms in this game.]] A less noticeable but even more anachronistic goof is that the in-game Hind also has a missile warning system for when enemies acquire a lock with a missile launcher, and an automated countermeasure system to redirect the first such missile fired at it; the real craft didn't have such systems until they started losing a handful of Hinds to Mujahideen fighters utilizing Stinger missiles partway through the UsefulNotes/SovietInvasionOfAfghanistan almost two decades later.
*** On the subject of helicopters, there are several KillStreak rewards to call them in as support, but the model used depends solely on what kill streak is used rather than which side called them in, meaning it's perfectly possible for an American MACV-SOG operator to hop into the controls of a Soviet Hind helicopter while a Soviet Spetsnaz soldier fires a minigun from out the side of an American Huey. It's even stranger in the case of the Gunship kill streak, which calls in the player-controlled Hind, because the game does have the necessary models, animations and coding to have the Huey act in the same capacity - but it's only used for the opening of the final campaign level, multiplayer settling for the Hind with a PaletteSwap depending on which team you're on (players on the user's team see it in tan while enemies see it in gray).
** ''Modern Warfare 3'''s ''VideoGame/CallOfDutyModernWarfare3'''s second mission starts with a transmission from F-22 pilots preparing for a bombing run, but the wireframe models and information on the screen, along with the planes that actually show up in the mission, are all once again F-15s. On top of that, the loadout shown for them tries to claim that an external fuel tank is a JDAM, and for the actual air strike they launch "JDAM Missiles", which A) don't exist ([=JDAMs=] are a conversion kit for unguided bombs), and B) are actually AIM-120 Sparrows, a dedicated air-to-air weapon.



** Zigzagged in the bomber level of ''United Offensive''. B-17s were in fact used by the RAF's 90 Squadron under the designation Fortress I, and were flown by them on daylight raids over Europe... but they were the B-17C model, a plane with a dramatically different appearance than the "classic" look of the B-17E and F models depicted in the game. These models were only used by the RAF in Coastal Command roles, under the designation Fortress IIA and Fortress II, respectively. The bombers also appear to have a mix of British and American markings, wearing RAF roundels but USAAF tail codes.

to:

** Zigzagged in the bomber level of ''United Offensive''.''[[VideoGame/CallOfDuty1 United Offensive]]''. B-17s were in fact used by the RAF's 90 Squadron under the designation Fortress I, and were flown by them on daylight raids over Europe... but they were the B-17C model, a plane with a dramatically different appearance than the "classic" look of the B-17E and F models depicted in the game. These models were only used by the RAF in Coastal Command roles, under the designation Fortress IIA and Fortress II, respectively. The bombers also appear to have a mix of British and American markings, wearing RAF roundels but USAAF tail codes.



* ''F-19 Stealth Fighter'' was a combat flight simulator produced by Microprose in 1986. Its fictional plane used the same general appearance as the Testor Corporation's model kit, and was similar in capability to the F-19 featured in Tom Clancy's Literature/RedStormRising a few years earlier. Ironically the game was released on the same day that the U.S. military admited the existence of the F-117, the RealLife "stealth fighter", which turned out to be quite a different bird. The 1991 sequel/remake added the real F-117, with real-world capability to match (flying the F-117 made for an easy mission, while flying the less-stealthy but air-to-air combat-capable F-19 made for a more exciting one).

to:

* ''F-19 Stealth Fighter'' was a combat flight simulator produced by Microprose in 1986. Its fictional plane used the same general appearance as the Testor Corporation's model kit, and was similar in capability to the F-19 featured in Tom Clancy's Literature/RedStormRising Creator/TomClancy's ''Literature/RedStormRising'' a few years earlier. Ironically the game was released on the same day that the U.S. military admited admitted the existence of the F-117, the RealLife "stealth fighter", which turned out to be quite a different bird. The 1991 sequel/remake added the real F-117, with real-world capability to match (flying the F-117 made for an easy mission, while flying the less-stealthy but air-to-air combat-capable F-19 made for a more exciting one).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Particularly jarring to anyone with half a brain in ''Series/{{Jericho}}'', where the main character reports seeing a Tupolev "Bear" and some escorts, when the plane in question is clearly is a C-130 Hercules, the single longest-produced ''American'' military aircraft of all time.

to:

* Particularly jarring to anyone with half a brain in ''Series/{{Jericho}}'', ''Series/Jericho2006'', where the main character reports seeing a Tupolev "Bear" and some escorts, when the plane in question is clearly is a C-130 Hercules, the single longest-produced ''American'' military aircraft of all time.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* In ''VideoGame/BanjoPilot'', the planes that Banjo and his friends fly slow down when they fly over terrain such as grass. This would make more sense in a car racing game due to friction.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Despite [[BackedByThePentagon the support of the U.S. Military]], the 2007 ''Film/{{Transformers}}'' movie contains a number of errors. An AC-130U Spooky gunship is used to take down the Decepticon Scorponok using "105 sabot rounds". The AC-130 is armed with a 105 mm howitzer, but there is no such thing as a sabot round for this type of weapon.[[note]]The cockpit dialogue during this sequence is accurate, though, since it was an actual AC-130 crew - Creator/MichaelBay simply gave the crew the target details and rolled camera.[[/note]] Later, F-22 Raptors were used to attack the Decepticons during the final battle using laser guided air-to-ground missiles. In real life, the F-22 cannot carry any laser guided missiles; it is designed to use GPS-guided bombs for air-to-ground attacks. Also, freaking jet powered Predator. While the C variant of the Predator is jet powered, it also has substantially redesigned wings and fuselage. Putting a jet engine in a Predator B frame and putting it through the maneuvers in the movie would probably have snapped the wings off. The first scene in the film also has an army spec-ops team return to base on V-22 Ospreys but the interior shots appear to be from CH-47 Chinook.

to:

* Despite [[BackedByThePentagon the support of the U.S. Military]], the 2007 ''Film/{{Transformers}}'' movie contains a number of errors. An AC-130U Spooky gunship is used to take down the Decepticon Scorponok using "105 sabot rounds". The AC-130 is armed with a 105 mm howitzer, but there is no such thing as a sabot round for this type of weapon.[[note]]The cockpit dialogue during this sequence is accurate, though, since it was an actual AC-130 crew - Creator/MichaelBay simply gave the crew the target details and rolled camera.[[/note]] Later, F-22 Raptors were used to attack the Decepticons during the final battle using laser guided air-to-ground missiles. In real life, the F-22 cannot carry any laser guided missiles; it is designed to use GPS-guided bombs for air-to-ground attacks. Also, freaking jet powered Predator. While the C variant of the Predator is jet powered, it also has substantially redesigned wings and fuselage. Putting a jet engine in a Predator B frame and putting it through the maneuvers in the movie would probably have snapped the wings off. The first scene in the film also has an army spec-ops team return to base on V-22 Ospreys but the interior shots appear to be from a CH-47 Chinook.



* In ''Film/AceVenturaWhenNatureCalls'', the opening sequence features Ace climbing some Alpine-looking mountains, dressed in suspenders and shorts often stereotypically portrayed on Swiss alpinists, and there is a helicopter flying around him painted in crimson red with a white cross at each side — the symbol and flag of Switzerland. The aircraft's tail number (license plate)? Canadian registration. [[CaliforniaDoubling Location shooting indeed...]]

to:

* In ''Film/AceVenturaWhenNatureCalls'', the opening sequence features Ace climbing some Alpine-looking mountains, dressed in suspenders and shorts often stereotypically portrayed on Swiss alpinists, and there is a helicopter flying around him painted in crimson red with a white cross at each side — the symbol and flag of Switzerland. The aircraft's tail number (license plate)? Canadian registration. [[CaliforniaDoubling Location shooting indeed...indeed.]]



* In ''Film/TheRock'', a flight of Air Force F/A-18 Hornets are sent on a bombing mission when it appears that the heroes have failed to neutralize the threat. The Air Force does not use F/A-18s in real life; only the Navy and the Marine Corps do. This was strange considering that the rest of the movie focused on the Marines and Navy.

to:

* In ''Film/TheRock'', a flight of Air Force F/A-18 Hornets identified as from the Air Force are sent on a bombing mission when it appears that the heroes have failed to neutralize the threat. The Air Force does not use F/A-18s in real life; only the Navy and the Marine Corps do. This was strange considering that the rest of the movie focused on the Marines and Navy.



* Averted in, of all things, ''Film/DrStrangelove'': not only was the B-52 correct in exterior shots (save for casting the shadow of a B-17), the B-52's cockpit avionics, especially the arming console, shown were so accurate that the Air Force freaked out (the bomber's interior was still classified). As it happened, [[Creator/StanleyKubrick Kubrick]] and his crew were familiar with B-17s and B-29s [[DuringTheWar from the War]] and had simply done an amazing job of extrapolation.

to:

* Averted in, of all things, ''Film/DrStrangelove'': not only was the B-52 correct in exterior shots (save for casting the shadow of a B-17), the B-52's cockpit avionics, especially the arming console, shown were so accurate that the Air Force freaked out (the bomber's interior was still classified). As it happened, [[Creator/StanleyKubrick Kubrick]] and his crew were familiar with B-17s and B-29s [[DuringTheWar from the War]] and had simply done an amazing job of extrapolation.

Top