Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Main / ImprobableTaxonomySkills

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Renamed trope


See also YouFailBiologyForever.

to:

See also YouFailBiologyForever.
ArtisticLicenseBiology.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Added a trope example



to:

* In ''Film/{{Them}}'' Dr Medford identifies the exact species of a dead giant ant with a glance at the body, despite the fact that size is high on the list of characteristics used to identify ant species.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


And a lot of them happen to look and behave very similarly to each other. Unfortunately, Hollywood thinks that any person who is sufficiently intelligent is also able to name any animal or plant they come across with its specific (and correct) Latin name, taxonomic history, habitat, diet and favorite color. In reality, unless you happen to be a foremost expert in studying that specific creature, it's unlikely that you could say anything more about it than "Hey, that's a bug!".

to:

And a lot of them happen to look and behave very similarly to each other. Unfortunately, Hollywood thinks that any person who is sufficiently intelligent is also able to name any animal or plant they come across with its specific (and correct) Latin name, taxonomic history, habitat, diet and favorite color. In reality, unless you happen to be a foremost expert in studying that specific creature, it's unlikely that you could say anything more about it than "Hey, that's a bug!".
bug!"



* The [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Hunt_of_the_Unicorn Unicorn Tapestries]], a group of seven tapestries dating from circa 1500, show at least 20 distinct types of flowers with more scientific accuracy than botany textbooks from the same period.

to:

* The [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Hunt_of_the_Unicorn Unicorn Tapestries]], Tapestries,]] a group of seven tapestries dating from circa 1500, show at least 20 distinct types of flowers with more scientific accuracy than botany textbooks from the same period.



* Col_Rutherford's "[[http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0367882/board/thread/146506319?d=146508542&p=2#146508542 revised script]]" of ''Film/IndianaJonesAndTheKingdomOfTheCrystalSkull'' changes Indy's line when he sees the carnivore ants from "Siafu!" to "''Paraponera clavata!''". According to the author, this is because siafu are from Africa, while the other are South American, [[MisplacedWildlife where the film takes place]]. Now, as to why would an archaeologist know how to identify ants to species level, let alone from a distance...

to:

* Col_Rutherford's "[[http://www.[[http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0367882/board/thread/146506319?d=146508542&p=2#146508542 revised script]]" "revised script"]] of ''Film/IndianaJonesAndTheKingdomOfTheCrystalSkull'' changes Indy's line when he sees the carnivore ants from "Siafu!" to "''Paraponera clavata!''". According to the author, this is because siafu are from Africa, while the other are South American, [[MisplacedWildlife where the film takes place]]. Now, as to why would an archaeologist know how to identify ants to species level, let alone from a distance...
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In ''Film/HoneyIShrunkTheKids'', the tiny kids are running away from a gigantic lawn mower and jump into a hole in the ground. Nick immediately identifies the exact species of worm that made the tunnel (despite the worm not even being present). Possibly justified in that they are in his backyard and since he is a science geek, it's at least remotely possible that he knows what species of worm lives in their area.

to:

* In ''Film/HoneyIShrunkTheKids'', the tiny kids are running away from a gigantic lawn mower and jump into a hole in the ground. Nick immediately identifies the exact species of worm that made the tunnel (despite the worm not even being present). Possibly justified in that they are in his backyard and since he is a science geek, it's at least remotely possible that he knows what species of worm lives in their area.area (Nick identifies it as a common earthworm, which would likely be most people's first guess anyway).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[/folder]]

Added: 268

Changed: 14

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[folder: Art ]]
* The [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Hunt_of_the_Unicorn Unicorn Tapestries]], a group of seven tapestries dating from circa 1500, show at least 20 distinct types of flowers with more scientific accuracy than botany textbooks from the same period.



* Subverted in ''Series/TheBigBangTheory'' where Sheldon thinks he can identify the specific species of a cricket by its chirping. He was in fact wrong, as pointed out by Howard (who spent his youth collecting insects), though Sheldon refused to believe it. In the end they turned to an associate with a [=PhD=] in entomology to settle the dispute... who identifies the cricket's species with a cursory glance, playing the trope straight. In fact, when asked, Professor Crawley claims he can identify every insect and arachnid in the world. There are 950,000 insect species and 50,000 arachnid species, making this claim rather unlikely. Even more so, arthropods are the single most diverse group on Earth; it is estimated that there are quite literally several ''million'' species of insects and arachnids that have ''not yet been identified'', which would make it difficult to ID "any" one finds.

to:

* Subverted in ''Series/TheBigBangTheory'' where Sheldon thinks he can identify the specific species of a cricket by its chirping. He was in fact wrong, as pointed out by Howard (who spent his youth collecting insects), though Sheldon refused to believe it. In the end they turned to an associate with a [=PhD=] in entomology to settle the dispute... who identifies the cricket's species with a cursory glance, playing the trope straight. In fact, when asked, [[PunnyName Professor Crawley Crawley]] claims he can identify every insect and arachnid in the world. There are 950,000 insect species and 50,000 arachnid species, making this claim rather unlikely. Even more so, arthropods are the single most diverse group on Earth; it is estimated that there are quite literally several ''million'' species of insects and arachnids that have ''not yet been identified'', which would make it difficult to ID "any" one finds.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Subverted in ''Series/TheBigBangTheory'' where Sheldon thinks he can identify the specific species of a cricket by its chirping. He was in fact wrong, as pointed out by Howard (who spent his youth collecting insects), though Sheldon refused to believe it. In the end they turned to an associate with a [=PhD=] in entomology to settle the dispute... who identifies the cricket's species with a cursory glance, playing the trope straight. In fact, when asked, Professor Crawley claims he can identify every insect and arachnid in the world. There are 950,000 insect species and 50,000 arachnid species, making this claim rather unlikely.

to:

* Subverted in ''Series/TheBigBangTheory'' where Sheldon thinks he can identify the specific species of a cricket by its chirping. He was in fact wrong, as pointed out by Howard (who spent his youth collecting insects), though Sheldon refused to believe it. In the end they turned to an associate with a [=PhD=] in entomology to settle the dispute... who identifies the cricket's species with a cursory glance, playing the trope straight. In fact, when asked, Professor Crawley claims he can identify every insect and arachnid in the world. There are 950,000 insect species and 50,000 arachnid species, making this claim rather unlikely. Even more so, arthropods are the single most diverse group on Earth; it is estimated that there are quite literally several ''million'' species of insects and arachnids that have ''not yet been identified'', which would make it difficult to ID "any" one finds.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


And a lot of them happen to look and behave very similarly to each other. Unfortunately, Hollywood thinks that any person who is sufficiently intelligent is also able to name any animal or plant they come across with its specific (and correct) Latin name, taxonomic history, and favorite color. In reality, unless you happen to be a foremost expert in studying that specific creature, it's unlikely that you could say anything more about it than "Hey, that's a bug!".

to:

And a lot of them happen to look and behave very similarly to each other. Unfortunately, Hollywood thinks that any person who is sufficiently intelligent is also able to name any animal or plant they come across with its specific (and correct) Latin name, taxonomic history, habitat, diet and favorite color. In reality, unless you happen to be a foremost expert in studying that specific creature, it's unlikely that you could say anything more about it than "Hey, that's a bug!".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


And a lot of them happen to look and behave very similarly to each other. Unfortunately, Hollywood thinks that any person who is sufficiently intelligent is also able to name any animal or plant they come across with its specific (and correct) Latin name, taxonomic history, and favorite color. In reality, unless you happen to be a foremost expert in studying that specific creature, it's unlikely that you could say anything more about it than "Hey that's a bug!".

to:

And a lot of them happen to look and behave very similarly to each other. Unfortunately, Hollywood thinks that any person who is sufficiently intelligent is also able to name any animal or plant they come across with its specific (and correct) Latin name, taxonomic history, and favorite color. In reality, unless you happen to be a foremost expert in studying that specific creature, it's unlikely that you could say anything more about it than "Hey "Hey, that's a bug!".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* For a plant case similar to the felids, the Citrus family is pretty a pretty tangled mess; the most popular citrus fruits are mostly hybrids of the four (or so) original species.

Changed: 1181

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* Species is, in general, a ''really'' fuzzy term, as witnessed by the fact that there are fairly acrimonious disputes over whether two animals which are pretty clearly similar but not quite identical are different ''species'', different ''subspecies'', or just different in appearance (generally called "breeds" when referring to animals, or "cultivars" when referring to plants). For many years the domestic dog was considered to be a distinct species from the wolf, but nowadays it's pretty generally accepted that they're the same species but ''may'' be different subspecies (which is an even fuzzier term). The usual definition for species is a "reproductively isolated population", but ... reproductively isolated ''how''? By behavior? By geography? By physically not being able to reproduce? Then there are felids, which are frequently cross-fertile across species that are of approximately the same size, as with lions and tigers (or lions and jaguars, or lions and leopards, or leopards and tigers, or ...), and in some cases the offspring ''themselves'' are fertile (many cross-species hybrids, such as mules, are sterile, but with felids this generally isn't the case).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


In the same vein, this is also when somebody sees a Latin name and can automatically tell you the rest of its taxonomy from that information. If the character is already familiar with the species or genus, this makes sense, but since the Latin name only gives genus and species, and since even a person who knows Latin generally can't determine anything about an organism without context, it sticks out as serious research failure.

to:

In the same vein, this is also when somebody sees a Latin name and can automatically tell you the rest of its taxonomy from that information. If the character is already familiar with the species or genus, this makes sense, but since the Latin name only gives genus and species, and since even a person who knows Latin generally can't determine anything about an organism without context, it sticks out as serious research failure.
failure.[[note]]Also, knowing Latin only helps so much for many names; it would let you guess that ''Mephitis mephitis'' (Stench stench) is probably a animal renowned for its stinkiness, but there are plenty of those ... skunks, polecats, stink beetles ... so ''which one''? (It's the striped skunk.)[[/note]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
I want to cut the Main redirect.


* ''Film/TheBeast'', the TV-movie adaptation of PeterBenchley's giant-squid-on-the-rampage novel ''Literature/{{Beast}}'' has the resident scientist instantly identify the squid as ''Archetuthis dux'' from a single sucker-claw and a whiff of ammonia. Especially bad because ''Architeuthis'' the giant squid ''doesn't have claws''. (The colossal squid ''Mesonychoteuthis'' does, though.) And most deep sea squid have a lot of ammonia in their systems.


to:

* ''Film/TheBeast'', the TV-movie adaptation of PeterBenchley's Creator/PeterBenchley's giant-squid-on-the-rampage novel ''Literature/{{Beast}}'' has the resident scientist instantly identify the squid as ''Archetuthis dux'' from a single sucker-claw and a whiff of ammonia. Especially bad because ''Architeuthis'' the giant squid ''doesn't have claws''. (The colossal squid ''Mesonychoteuthis'' does, though.) And most deep sea squid have a lot of ammonia in their systems.

Added: 594

Changed: 600

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Added collapsible folders.


[[AC:FanFic]]

to:

[[AC:FanFic]][[foldercontrol]]

[[folder: Fan Fic ]]



[[AC:{{Film}}]]

to:

[[AC:{{Film}}]][[/folder]]

[[folder: Film ]]



[[AC: {{Literature}}]]

to:

[[AC: {{Literature}}]][[/folder]]

[[folder: Literature ]]



[[AC: LiveActionTV]]

to:

[[AC: LiveActionTV]][[/folder]]

[[folder: Live Action TV ]]



[[AC: VideoGames]]

to:

[[AC: VideoGames]][[/folder]]

[[folder: Video Games ]]



[[AC: Web Comics]]

to:

[[AC: [[/folder]]

[[folder:
Web Comics]]Comics ]]



[[AC: WesternAnimation]]
* Jane Porter from ''WesternAnimation/TheLegendOfTarzan'' is able to identify a ([[RaptorAttack typically grossly inaccurate and quite oversized]]) velociraptor at a glance. Worse still is that fact that she isn't a paleontologist of any sort and in fact the series takes place before velociraptors were scientifically described and named, and many decades before they were recognized in popular public consciousness

[[AC: RealLife]]

to:

[[AC: WesternAnimation]]
[[/folder]]

[[folder: Western Animation ]]

* Jane Porter from ''WesternAnimation/TheLegendOfTarzan'' is able to identify a ([[RaptorAttack typically grossly inaccurate and quite oversized]]) velociraptor at a glance. Worse still is that fact that she isn't a paleontologist of any sort and in fact the series takes place before velociraptors were scientifically described and named, and many decades before they were recognized in popular public consciousness

[[AC: RealLife]]
consciousness

[[/folder]]

[[folder: Real Life ]]


Added DiffLines:


[[/folder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Slightly done in Litearture/SherlockHolmes when he correctly identifies the lion's mane jellyfish as the killer of the victim when he sees it at the bottom of a small pool. Very much justified, however, in that this is one species which is very distinctive (it's really, really big) and that the victim's last words were "the lion's mane."

to:

* Slightly done in Litearture/SherlockHolmes Literature/SherlockHolmes when he correctly identifies the lion's mane jellyfish as the killer of the victim when he sees it at the bottom of a small pool. Very much justified, however, in that this is one species which is very distinctive (it's really, really big) and that the victim's last words were "the lion's mane."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Averted in one of Creator/BarbaraHambly's ''Literature/{{Darwath}}'' novels. Rudy can instantly identify a small animal from its bones, but he was highly trained in botany/zoology/magic and the question is: 'rabbit or chicken'.

to:

* Averted in one of Creator/BarbaraHambly's ''Literature/{{Darwath}}'' novels.''Literature/TheArmiesOfDaylight''. Rudy can instantly identify a small animal from its bones, but he was highly trained in botany/zoology/magic and the question is: 'rabbit or chicken'.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Averted in one of Creator/BarbaraHambly's sequels to the ''Rising of the Dark''. One character can instantly identify a small animal from its bones, but he was highly trained in botany/zoology/magic and the question is: 'rabbit or chicken'.

to:

* Averted in one of Creator/BarbaraHambly's sequels to the ''Rising of the Dark''. One character ''Literature/{{Darwath}}'' novels. Rudy can instantly identify a small animal from its bones, but he was highly trained in botany/zoology/magic and the question is: 'rabbit or chicken'.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Slightly done in SherlockHolmes when he correctly identifies the lion's mane jellyfish as the killer of the victim when he sees it at the bottom of a small pool. Very much justified, however, in that this is one species which is very distinctive (it's really, really big) and that the victim's last words were "the lion's mane."
* Averted in one of BarbaraHambly's sequels to the ''Rising of the Dark''. One character can instantly identify a small animal from its bones, but he was highly trained in botany/zoology/magic and the question is: 'rabbit or chicken'.

to:

* Slightly done in SherlockHolmes Litearture/SherlockHolmes when he correctly identifies the lion's mane jellyfish as the killer of the victim when he sees it at the bottom of a small pool. Very much justified, however, in that this is one species which is very distinctive (it's really, really big) and that the victim's last words were "the lion's mane."
* Averted in one of BarbaraHambly's Creator/BarbaraHambly's sequels to the ''Rising of the Dark''. One character can instantly identify a small animal from its bones, but he was highly trained in botany/zoology/magic and the question is: 'rabbit or chicken'.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Amusingly, while Conseil had a remarkable memory for the taxonic classification of species, he had very little idea what they actually ''look'' like. By contrast, talented sailor and harpooner but rather BookDumb Ned Land knows nothing much about taxonomy but can recognise many species of fish by sight. As Arronax remarks, [[ByYourPowersCombined by their powers combined]] they are one extremely talented marine biologist.

to:

** Amusingly, while Conseil had a remarkable memory for the taxonic classification of species, he had very little idea what they actually ''look'' like. By contrast, talented sailor and harpooner but rather BookDumb Ned Land knows nothing much about taxonomy but can recognise many species of fish by sight. As Arronax remarks, [[ByYourPowersCombined [[AllYourPowersCombined by their powers combined]] they are one extremely talented marine biologist.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** In all fairness, the character ''does'' have a doctorate in paleobotany, and many high-ranking and distinctive taxonomic groups of plants do have few or no living representatives (for instance, the entire phylum of [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pteridospermatophyta seed ferns]] has been extinct since the Eocene at the latest, and the order [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ginkgoales]] is represented by only one living species, ''Ginkgo biloba'').

to:

** In all fairness, the character ''does'' have a doctorate in paleobotany, and many high-ranking and distinctive taxonomic groups of plants do have few or no living representatives (for instance, the entire phylum of [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pteridospermatophyta seed ferns]] has been extinct since the Eocene at the latest, and the order [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ginkgoales]] org/wiki/Ginkgoales Ginkgoales]] is represented by only one a single living species, ''Ginkgo biloba'').biloba'').

Added: 454

Changed: 5

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Film/JurassicPark'': Elly, a paleobotanist, knows from a cursory glance that a certain plant is an extinct species.

to:

* ''Film/JurassicPark'': Elly, Ellie, a paleobotanist, knows from a cursory glance that a certain plant is an extinct species.species.
** In all fairness, the character ''does'' have a doctorate in paleobotany, and many high-ranking and distinctive taxonomic groups of plants do have few or no living representatives (for instance, the entire phylum of [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pteridospermatophyta seed ferns]] has been extinct since the Eocene at the latest, and the order [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ginkgoales]] is represented by only one living species, ''Ginkgo biloba'').



** But the cake is taken by Conseil, a ''manservant'' to prof. Arronax in ''Literature/TwentyThousandLeaguesUnderTheSea''. The man was a living classification handbook.

to:

** But the cake is taken by Conseil, a ''manservant'' to prof.Prof. Arronax in ''Literature/TwentyThousandLeaguesUnderTheSea''. The man was a living classification handbook.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Subverted in ''Series/TheBigBangTheory'' where Sheldon thinks he can identify the specific species of a cricket by its chirping. He was in fact wrong, as pointed out by Howard (who spent his youth collecting insects), though Sheldon refused to believe it. In the end they turned to an associate with a [=PhD=] in entomology to settle the dispute (who identifies the cricket's species with a cursory glance, playing the trope straight).

to:

* Subverted in ''Series/TheBigBangTheory'' where Sheldon thinks he can identify the specific species of a cricket by its chirping. He was in fact wrong, as pointed out by Howard (who spent his youth collecting insects), though Sheldon refused to believe it. In the end they turned to an associate with a [=PhD=] in entomology to settle the dispute (who dispute... who identifies the cricket's species with a cursory glance, playing the trope straight).straight. In fact, when asked, Professor Crawley claims he can identify every insect and arachnid in the world. There are 950,000 insect species and 50,000 arachnid species, making this claim rather unlikely.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Subverted in ''Series/TheBigBangTheory'' where Sheldon thinks he can identify the specific species of a cricket by its chirping. He was in fact wrong, as pointed out by Howard (who spent his youth collecting insects), though Sheldon refused to believe it. In the end they turned to an associate with a [=PhD=] in entomology to settle the dispute.

to:

* Subverted in ''Series/TheBigBangTheory'' where Sheldon thinks he can identify the specific species of a cricket by its chirping. He was in fact wrong, as pointed out by Howard (who spent his youth collecting insects), though Sheldon refused to believe it. In the end they turned to an associate with a [=PhD=] in entomology to settle the dispute.dispute (who identifies the cricket's species with a cursory glance, playing the trope straight).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[AC: WesternAnimation]]
* Jane Porter from ''WesternAnimation/TheLegendOfTarzan'' is able to identify a ([[RaptorAttack typically grossly inaccurate and quite oversized]]) velociraptor at a glance. Worse still is that fact that she isn't a paleontologist of any sort and in fact the series takes place before velociraptors were scientifically described and named, and many decades before they were recognized in popular public consciousness
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* Common in ''Literature/{{Dinoverse}}''. Known dinosaur-nerd [[TeenGenius Betram]] probably has a reasonable chance of identifying common animals and plants in his favorite part of the Mesozoic. When it's his teacher's turn, well, Mr. London knew about Betram's adventure and regeared all his classes to be about the age of the dinosaurs, so he and his students aren't jumping into things blind, but it's weird how they quickly and unambigiously identify non-stock dinosaurs like Acrocanthosaurus and Hypsilophodon. And back in the first set of books [[RebelliousSpirit Janine]], who's insightful but not markedly interested in dinosaurs, happens to know about the digestive processes of Ankylosaurus.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Subverted in ''TheBigBangTheory'' where Sheldon thinks he can identify the specific species of a cricket by its chirping. He was in fact wrong, as pointed out by Howard (who spent his youth collecting insects), though Sheldon refused to believe it. In the end they turned to an associate with a [=PhD=] in entomology to settle the dispute.

to:

* Subverted in ''TheBigBangTheory'' ''Series/TheBigBangTheory'' where Sheldon thinks he can identify the specific species of a cricket by its chirping. He was in fact wrong, as pointed out by Howard (who spent his youth collecting insects), though Sheldon refused to believe it. In the end they turned to an associate with a [=PhD=] in entomology to settle the dispute.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


In the same vein, this is also when somebody sees Latin name and can automatically tell you the rest of its taxonomy from that information. If the character is already familiar with the species or genus, this makes sense, but since the Latin name only gives genus and species, and since even a person who knows Latin generally can't determine anything about an organism without context, it sticks out as serious research failure.

to:

In the same vein, this is also when somebody sees a Latin name and can automatically tell you the rest of its taxonomy from that information. If the character is already familiar with the species or genus, this makes sense, but since the Latin name only gives genus and species, and since even a person who knows Latin generally can't determine anything about an organism without context, it sticks out as serious research failure.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Amusingly, while Conseil had a remarkable memory for the taxonic classification of species, he had very little idea what they actually ''look'' like. By contrast, talented sailor and harpooner but rather BookDumb Ned Land knows nothing much about taxonomy but can recognise many species of fish by sight. As Arronax remarks, [[ByYourPowersCombined by their powers combined]] they are one extremely talented marine biologist.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In ''VideoGame/JaggedAlliance 2'', everyone has a comment on the monstrous and unearthly creatures you'll inevitably encounter if you tick the "Sci-Fi" option. Most mercenaries express various forms of surprise, but the medical doctors of your team will immediately start pinning down their taxonomy on first sight. (Crustacea, they seem to agree, which [[ReverseFunnyAneurysm amusingly]] makes them [[GiantEnemyCrab Giant Enemy Crabs]].)

to:

* In ''VideoGame/JaggedAlliance 2'', everyone has a comment on the monstrous and unearthly creatures you'll inevitably encounter if you tick the "Sci-Fi" option. Most mercenaries express various forms of surprise, but the medical doctors of your team will immediately start pinning down their taxonomy on first sight. (Crustacea, they seem to agree, which [[ReverseFunnyAneurysm [[HilariousInHindsight amusingly]] makes them [[GiantEnemyCrab Giant Enemy Crabs]].)

Changed: 453

Removed: 463

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In 1839, Richard Owen was sent (among other things) a 6-inch bone fragment from Australia, which he identified as belonging to a previously-unknown-to-science extinct giant bird. This turned out to be the giant Dinornis or Moa.
** Owen actually was an example of the aforementioned "[=PhD=]-qualified taxonomist", who specialized in paleontology and comparative anatomy.
*** Not only that, Owen was world-renowned for being the best comparative anatomist of his generation. He was the ''only person in the world'' who could do this (at the time, anyway. The generation before him had Georges Cuvier, who invented the field of comparative anatomy. Owen was even known as "The British Cuvier").

to:

* In 1839, Richard Owen was sent (among other things) a 6-inch bone fragment from Australia, which he identified as belonging to a previously-unknown-to-science extinct giant bird. This turned out to be the giant Dinornis or Moa.
**
Moa. Owen actually was an example of the aforementioned "[=PhD=]-qualified taxonomist", who specialized in paleontology and comparative anatomy.
*** Not only that, Owen
anatomy, and was world-renowned for being the best comparative anatomist of his generation. He Therefore, he was the ''only person in the world'' who could do this (at the time, anyway. The generation before him had Georges Cuvier, who invented the field of comparative anatomy. Owen was even known as "The British Cuvier").

Top