Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Main / INeverSaidItWasPoison

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''Webcomic/MadameOutlaw'': In the tenth chapter, the magistrate accuses Estelle of illicit activities such as stealing staff from another estate. In an attempt to defend herself, she claims that the warden is ill of character. The magistrate replies that he had never even mentioned the warden, so why is she saying she encountered him?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Parodied in the ''Webcomic/MonsterOfTheWeek'' [[https://www.shaenon.com/monsteroftheweek/2013/04/12/04122013/ strip]] based on "[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Recap/TheXFilesS02E15FreshBones Fresh Bones]]":

to:

* Parodied in the ''Webcomic/MonsterOfTheWeek'' [[https://www.shaenon.com/monsteroftheweek/2013/04/12/04122013/ strip]] based on "[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Recap/TheXFilesS02E15FreshBones "[[Recap/TheXFilesS02E15FreshBones Fresh Bones]]":
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Parodied in the ''Webcomic/MonsterOfTheWeek'' [[https://www.shaenon.com/monsteroftheweek/2013/04/12/04122013/ strip]] based on "[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Recap/TheXFilesS02E15FreshBones Fresh Bones]]":
-->'''Mulder''': We're here to investigate a string of suicides at your military base.\\
'''Colonel Wharton''': I don't know about any voodoo revenge murders.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''VisualNovel/RagingLoop'': Yasunaga manages to out [[spoiler:Chikamochi]] as a wolf in the ''Wit'' route when the latter mentions how [[spoiler:Kaori]] had been stabbed to death, when Yasunaga never specified ''how'' they died.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** In ''Literature/GuardsGuards!'', Lupine Wonse's immediate response to Vimes reporting the destruction of the Elucidated Brethren's headquarters was a suspiciously specific "Any of them get out?" Because Vimes was distracted, he doesn't pick up on this until a EurekaMoment later on.

to:

** In ''Literature/GuardsGuards!'', ''Literature/GuardsGuards'', Lupine Wonse's immediate response to Vimes reporting the destruction of the Elucidated Brethren's headquarters was a suspiciously specific "Any of them get out?" Because Vimes was distracted, he doesn't pick up on this until a EurekaMoment later on.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


-->[[spoiler:'''Wanda:''' ''(realizes her mistake)'' You never told me her name, did you?]]
-->[[spoiler:'''Strange:''' [[TranquilFury No. I didn't.]]]]

to:

-->[[spoiler:'''Wanda:''' ''(realizes her mistake)'' You never told me her name, did you?]]
-->[[spoiler:'''Strange:'''
you?\\
'''Strange:'''
[[TranquilFury No. I didn't.]]]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** In "The Man in the Alley", Ben realises that the mastermind behind the assassination UsefulNotes/WilliamMcKinley is [[spoiler: Arthur Plenty]] because [[spoiler:his editorial mentions the exact price Leon Czolgosz paid for the gun he used before Czolgosz had confessed all the details]]. Ben knew the price because he had been tailing Czolgosz when he bought it, but Plenty could only have known if he was the person who provided the cash]].

to:

** In "The Man in the Alley", Ben realises that the mastermind behind the assassination UsefulNotes/WilliamMcKinley is [[spoiler: Arthur Plenty]] because [[spoiler:his editorial mentions the exact price Leon Czolgosz paid for the gun he used before Czolgosz had confessed all the details]].details. Ben knew the price because he had been tailing Czolgosz when he bought it, but Plenty could only have known if he was the person who provided the cash]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** In "The Man in the Alley", Ben realises that the mastermind behind the assassination UsefulNotes/WilliamMcKinley is [[spoiler: Arthur Plenty] because [[spoiler:his editorial mentions the exact price Leon Czolgosz paid for the gun he used before Czolgosz had confessed all the details. Ben knew the price because he had been tailing Czolgosz when he bought it, but Plenty could only have known if he was the person who provided the cash]].

to:

** In "The Man in the Alley", Ben realises that the mastermind behind the assassination UsefulNotes/WilliamMcKinley is [[spoiler: Arthur Plenty] Plenty]] because [[spoiler:his editorial mentions the exact price Leon Czolgosz paid for the gun he used before Czolgosz had confessed all the details.details]]. Ben knew the price because he had been tailing Czolgosz when he bought it, but Plenty could only have known if he was the person who provided the cash]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Crosswicking.

Added DiffLines:

* ''WebAnimation/EtraChanSawIt'': [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YvXpblCtV08 When Azami finds the missing key to the safe]], [[spoiler:Tokusa reveals he had the key, so no one could have really found it without making a copy. When everyone asks her about this, she denies making a copy and stealing money from the safe. Tokusa then mentions he never told anyone about the stolen money, exposing her as the culprit.]]

Added: 1043

Changed: 201

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Literature/BenSnow'': In "Frontier Street", the murderer gives himself away when he says how many times the victim had been struck over the head: something he would not have been able to tell just from looking at the body.

to:

* ''Literature/BenSnow'': ''Literature/BenSnow'':
**
In "Frontier Street", the murderer gives himself away when he says how many times the victim had been struck over the head: something he would not have been able to tell just from looking at the body.body.
** In "The Man in the Alley", Ben realises that the mastermind behind the assassination UsefulNotes/WilliamMcKinley is [[spoiler: Arthur Plenty] because [[spoiler:his editorial mentions the exact price Leon Czolgosz paid for the gun he used before Czolgosz had confessed all the details. Ben knew the price because he had been tailing Czolgosz when he bought it, but Plenty could only have known if he was the person who provided the cash]].
** In "Brothers on the Beach", the killer slips up when they mention that they didn't have someone holding the wingtip steady during the first attempted flight of the Wright Brothers Flyer, which was when the murder occurred. However, the killer had gone some trouble to establish an alibi of not being present at the first attempt, and shouldn't have known what Orville and Wilbur did or didn't do.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Mario and Luigi are already suspicious of Koopa in ''Film/SuperMarioBros'' when he tries to play a lawyer, but it only intensifies when he asks about the meteorite piece they got from Daisy, which he'd have no reason to know about.

to:

* Mario and Luigi are already suspicious of Koopa in ''Film/SuperMarioBros'' ''Film/SuperMarioBros1993'' when he tries to play a lawyer, but it only intensifies when he asks about the meteorite piece they got from Daisy, which he'd have no reason to know about.

Added: 408

Changed: 2

Removed: 387

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Literature/InDeath'': Used at some point or another in ''almost every single book'' in the series.%%How?

to:

* %%* ''Literature/InDeath'': Used at some point or another in ''almost every single book'' in the series.%%How?



* ''Literature/TheMazeRunner'': In ''The Scorch Trials'', while Thomas never mentions to Brenda that his group calls themselves [[spoiler:Gladers]], she ends up mentioning it in casual conversation. This foreshadows the fact that she and Jorge had actually been working for [[spoiler:WICKED all along; she most likely knows the term because she heard them call themselves that while she monitored the Maze]].



* In ''Literature/TheScorchTrials'', while Thomas never mentions to Brenda that his group calls themselves [[spoiler:Gladers]], she ends up mentioning it in casual conversation. This foreshadows the fact that she and Jorge had actually been working for [[spoiler:WICKED all along; she most likely knows the term because she heard them call themselves that while she monitored the Maze]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* One of the things that initially lead to O.J. Simpson coming under suspicion for the murders of Nicole Simpson and Ron Goldman was that when informed that Nicole had died he asked "Who killed her?".

to:

* One of the things that initially lead led to O.J. Simpson Creator/OJSimpson coming under suspicion for the murders of Nicole Simpson and Ron Goldman was that when informed that Nicole had died he asked "Who killed her?".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In the short story "Death of the King" by Theodore Matthiason, UsefulNotes/AlexanderTheGreat is dying, not of sickness as the historical records will claim, but of poison. He and his physician are trying to find out WhodunnitToMe, [[spoiler: until the physician offers Alexander a cushion "for the great pain in your back", and the emperor realises he knows more about how this poison works than he admitted]].

to:

* In the short story "Death of the King" by Theodore Matthiason, Mathieson, UsefulNotes/AlexanderTheGreat is dying, not of sickness as the historical records will claim, but of poison. He and his physician are trying to find out WhodunnitToMe, [[spoiler: until [[spoiler:until the physician offers Alexander a cushion "for the great pain in your back", and the emperor realises he knows more about how this poison works than he admitted]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''Literature/TwoLittleGirlsInBlue'': When the FBI interview Norman Bond about the Frawley twins' kidnapping, they bring up his currently missing ex-wife, to which he snaps he had nothing to do with his "late" wife's disappearance. The feds take note of this, pointedly asking how he knows she's dead. While someone missing for seventeen years without a trace probably is dead in all likelihood, it makes Norman nervous. [[spoiler:It's later revealed he ''was'' responsible for his ex-wife's disappearance]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* A deleted scene in ''Film/AustinPowers'' involves Austin asking about "Mr" Evil (as well as Mr Pepper). Naturally, the FemmeFatale he's questioning replies with "Dr Evil" and "Dr Pepper" respectively.

Added: 494

Removed: 527

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
saying "could have been" doesn't seem like it's a betrayal of knowledge


* ''Literature/DesertStar'': Subverted. Detective Renee Ballard zeroes in on Nelson Hastings as the killer because Hastings said he didn't remember any black people volunteering for the Pearlman campaign, when Renee never told him that murder victim Laura Wilson was black. However, when Renee confronts Hastings with this gotcha, he says he looked up "Laura Wilson murder Los Angeles" on the internet and found a news story with Wilson's picture. And as it turns out, Hastings didn't do it.



* A ''Literature/NancyDrew ''book had a {{Jerkass}} character being poisoned, but ultimately recovering. A few days later, his ex-girlfriend taunts him about it as he tries to eat breakfast, stating, "You know, poison doesn't have to be a powder. Something could have been injected into that orange..." The only way she could have known what type of poison was used was if she was the assailant. [[QuoteMine Just change "doesn't have to be" to "wasn't"]] and you've got an admission of guilt that still wouldn't stand in trial.

Changed: 138

Removed: 140

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
The indentation system only allows paragraphs of up to three bullets


** ''VisualNovel/ApolloJusticeAceAttorney'':
*** The villain of the first case has a ''really'' bad habit of running his mouth, and does this no less than three times in the first case.

to:

** ''VisualNovel/ApolloJusticeAceAttorney'':
***
''VisualNovel/ApolloJusticeAceAttorney'': The villain of the first case has a ''really'' bad habit of running his mouth, and does this no less than three times in the first case.

Added: 1277

Changed: 416

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** The first case plays with this. The decisive evidence is, unbeknownst to Apollo, [[spoiler:a fake duplicate of the real decisive evidence]], specifically [[spoiler:an ace of spades with a bloodstain on it]]. But the culprit can't reveal the evidence [[spoiler:is fake]] without also revealing that he took the [[spoiler:real one]]. [[MortonsFork Either way, he's going to jail]].

to:

*** The villain of the first case plays has a ''really'' bad habit of running his mouth, and does this no less than three times in the first case.
**** The first time, he mentions that the victim, Shadi Smith, was bald- Shadi had been wearing a hat up until he died and was a vagrant who no one really knew, so the only way the villain could've known was if he'd knocked the hat off while killing Shadi. This causes Phoenix to suspect his involvement.
**** The second time, he states that the cards used in the poker game Phoenix and Shadi were playing had blue backs. They were actually ''red''-backed due to an anti-cheating safeguard, and everyone who was at the crime scene legitimately knew this... but the murderer had taken an incriminating card and replaced it
with this. a blue card, so the murderer, and ''only'' the murderer, would have thought the cards were blue.
****
The third time is played with, as the decisive evidence is, unbeknownst puts him in a bit of a MortonsFork; either he [[spoiler: calls it out as a forgery]] and gets caught because there's no way he would've known that if he wasn't the one to Apollo, [[spoiler:a fake duplicate of [[spoiler: destroy the real decisive evidence]], specifically [[spoiler:an ace or says nothing and gets caught because of spades with a bloodstain on it]]. But the culprit can't reveal hole the evidence [[spoiler:is fake]] without poked in his argument. However, he also revealing immediately jumps to [[spoiler: calling the evidence forged]] instead of merely expressing doubts, making it obvious that he took knew for a fact [[spoiler: the [[spoiler:real one]]. [[MortonsFork Either way, he's going to jail]].evidence was forged.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
The indentation system only allows paragraphs of up to three bullets. And this was written in violation to Repair Dont Respond anyway


*** The culprit of this case originally drew Phoenix's suspicion when they made two of these mistakes; the [[spoiler: forged ace]] was just to catch them in court. The first mistake was mentioning that the victim was bald, when said victim had been wearing a hat until he was murdered. The second was saying that the cards on the scene had blue backs. They were actually red, but the only pictures of the scene were black-and-white, so the only people who could make color judgements were those at the scene. Phoenix already knew that the murderer thought the cards were blue (because the murderer had replaced an incriminating red card with a blue one) and that the three people who were there legitimately (Phoenix, Olga Orly, and the victim) knew the deck was supposed to be red... so the person who made an offhand comment about the cards being blue had to be the killer, because if they had nothing to do with the case then they couldn't have believed they knew the cards' color, and if they'd learned of the deck's color from someone else, they would've known that the cards were actually red-backed.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

**** The culprit of this case originally drew Phoenix's suspicion when they made two of these mistakes; the [[spoiler: forged ace]] was just to catch them in court. The first mistake was mentioning that the victim was bald, when said victim had been wearing a hat until he was murdered. The second was saying that the cards on the scene had blue backs. They were actually red, but the only pictures of the scene were black-and-white, so the only people who could make color judgements were those at the scene. Phoenix already knew that the murderer thought the cards were blue (because the murderer had replaced an incriminating red card with a blue one) and that the three people who were there legitimately (Phoenix, Olga Orly, and the victim) knew the deck was supposed to be red... so the person who made an offhand comment about the cards being blue had to be the killer, because if they had nothing to do with the case then they couldn't have believed they knew the cards' color, and if they'd learned of the deck's color from someone else, they would've known that the cards were actually red-backed.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''WebAnimation/Supermarioglitchy4sSuperMario64Bloopers'': In [[Recap/Supermarioglitchy4sSuperMario64BloopersIfMarioWasAMONGUS "If Mario was AMONG US"]], Mario was able to catch the Impostor thanks to the fact he mentioned Mario and Green were in a room with an open vent... a room he shouldn't have been in.

to:

* ''WebAnimation/Supermarioglitchy4sSuperMario64Bloopers'': In [[Recap/Supermarioglitchy4sSuperMario64BloopersIfMarioWasAMONGUS "If Mario was AMONG US"]], Mario was able to catch realizes [[spoiler:Brown]] is the Impostor thanks to the fact when he mentioned mentions that Mario and Green were in a room with an open vent... a room he shouldn't have been in.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* An exaggerated version with New Zealand baby farmer John Makin. While awaiting trial, he had told his cellmate that the police could not prove he had poisoned any of the infants under his care. He was right. However, this was because the bodies were too decayed for a cause of death to be established, meaning that nobody other than Makin had ever suggested he had poisoned them.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''WebAnimation/Supermarioglitchy4sSuperMario64Bloopers'': In [[Recap/Supermarioglitchy4sSuperMario64BloopersIfMarioWasAMONGUS "If Mario was AMONG US"]], Mario was able to catch the Impostor thanks to the fact he mentioned Mario and Green were in a room with an open vent... a room he shouldn't have been in.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Film/ALizardInAWomansSkin'' has an example. Julia, a free and libertine woman is brutally murdered in her apartment; the suspicion falls on her neighbor, Carol, a wife of Frank, a promising lawyer whose father is a prominent politician and a lawyer himself. The evidence points to Carol, who is promptly arrested, yet the police inspector, unable to find any clear motive, suspects a more complex possibility. Carol had some personal troubles and was seeing a psychoanalyst, who asked her to keep a diary of her vivid dreams; some dreams included a passionate love affair with Julia and one recent dream described Carol brutally slaying her. The inspector thinks that someone read the diary and modelled the crime on her dreams while planting the evidence. In the climax, the inspector meets Carol, telling her the evidence suggests her father killed Julia when she started blackmailing him with the evidence of Frank's infidelity, threatening to expose the evidence and ruin the reputation of a law firm Frank and his father ran together, then committed suicide to save Carol when she was committed to an asylum. Carol says she knew that because Julia phoned her father with a blackmail offer. The inspector asks how did she know that, since the man never talked about the blackmail to anyone but Frank in private after Carol was already committed. Suddenly he realizes the simplest solution was right all along: Carol ''did'' have a passionate affair with Julia and murdered her when threatened with exposure - Julia made her call just before being slain and only the killer could have known what the call was all about.

to:

* The 1971 giallo film ''Film/ALizardInAWomansSkin'' has an example. Julia, a A free and libertine woman named Julia is brutally murdered in her apartment; the suspicion falls on her neighbor, Carol, a wife of Frank, a promising lawyer whose father is a prominent politician and a lawyer himself. The evidence points to Carol, who is promptly arrested, yet the police inspector, unable to find any clear motive, suspects a more complex possibility. Carol had some personal troubles and was seeing a psychoanalyst, who asked her to keep a diary of her vivid dreams; some dreams included a passionate love affair with Julia and one recent dream described Carol brutally slaying her. The inspector thinks that someone read the diary and modelled the crime on her dreams while planting the evidence. In the climax, the inspector meets Carol, telling her the evidence suggests her father killed Julia when she started blackmailing him with the evidence of Frank's infidelity, threatening to expose the evidence and ruin the reputation of a law firm Frank and his father ran together, then committed suicide to save Carol when she was committed to an asylum. Carol says she knew that because Julia phoned her father with a blackmail offer. The inspector asks how did she know that, since the man never talked about the blackmail to anyone but Frank in private after Carol was already committed. Suddenly Suddenly, he realizes the simplest solution was right all along: Carol ''did'' have a passionate affair with Julia and murdered her when threatened with exposure - Julia made her call just before being slain and only the killer could have known what the call was all about.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In [[https://web.archive.org/web/20091224180921/http://everything2.com/title/I+want+my+trail+to+grow+over+and+disappear%252C+but+now+someone+is+reading+it. one chapter]] of ''Literature/NewYorkMagician'', Michel confronts a suspect in a girl's disappearance. Every word out of the man's mouth [[DiggingYourselfDeeper somehow gets him into more trouble]].

to:

* In [[https://web.archive.org/web/20091224180921/http://everything2.com/title/I+want+my+trail+to+grow+over+and+disappear%252C+but+now+someone+is+reading+it. com/title/I+want+my+trail+to+grow+over+and+disappear%252C+but+now+someone+is+reading+it one chapter]] of ''Literature/NewYorkMagician'', Michel confronts a suspect in a girl's disappearance. Every word out of the man's mouth [[DiggingYourselfDeeper somehow gets him into more trouble]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:


** The most recent example happened at All Out 2021. With his originally scheduled opponent Pac unable to attend due to travel issues (which had plagued Pac and the Lucha Bros. before hand, all of which were implied to have been caused by Andrade), Andrade and Chavo Guerrero Jr. were interviewed backstage. After having been asked point blank if they were the cause of Pac's travel issues, Chavo quickly interjected that he didn't even know the number for American Airlines, and then quickly backtracked and said "if that's the flight he was using."

to:

** The most recent example happened at * In All Out 2021. With 2021, with his originally scheduled opponent Pac unable to attend due to travel issues (which had plagued Pac and the Lucha Bros. before hand, beforehand, all of which were implied to have been caused by Andrade), Andrade and Chavo Guerrero Jr. were interviewed backstage. After having been asked point blank if they were the cause of Pac's travel issues, Chavo quickly interjected that he didn't even know the number for American Airlines, and then quickly backtracked and said "if that's the flight he was using."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** The most recent example happened at All Out 2021. With his originally scheduled opponent Pac unable to attend due to travel issues (which had plagued Pac and the Lucha Bros. before hand, all of which were implied to have been caused by Andrade), Andrade and Chavo Guerrero Jr. were interviewed backstage. After having been asked point blank if they were the cause of Pac's travel issues, Chavo quickly interjected that he didn't even know the number for American Airlines, and then quickly backtracked and said "if that's the flight he was using."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** [[Recap/RugratsS1E11TouchdownTommyTheTrial "The Trial"]]: Someone has broken Tommy's clown lamp, so the babies set up a fake court. Angelica serves as the attorney, confirming the other babies' stories about what they were doing when the lamp broke. Near the end, Tommy says that Angelica couldn't have done it since she was asleep, taking a nap... at which point everyone realizes Angelica couldn't have known what they were doing when the lamp broke unless she wasn't asleep. Angelica then gives a gloating confession to breaking the lamp and tries to pull a KarmaHoudini by pointing out that they can't get her in trouble because the adults can't understand the babies. Unfortunately for Angelica, while the adults can't understand the babies, they ''can'' understand ''her''; and this gloating confession is loud enough that Didi and Betty overhear her and promptly punish her.

to:

** [[Recap/RugratsS1E11TouchdownTommyTheTrial "The Trial"]]: Someone has broken Tommy's clown lamp, so the babies set up a fake court.court to find out who did it. Angelica serves as the attorney, confirming the other babies' stories about what they were doing when the lamp broke. Near the end, Tommy says that Angelica couldn't have done it since she was asleep, taking a nap... at which point everyone realizes Angelica couldn't have known what they were doing when the lamp broke unless she wasn't asleep. Angelica then gives a gloating confession to breaking the lamp and tries to pull a KarmaHoudini by pointing out that they can't get her in trouble because the adults can't understand the babies. Unfortunately for Angelica, while the adults can't understand the babies, they ''can'' understand ''her''; and this gloating confession is loud enough that Didi and Betty overhear her and promptly punish her.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* This is inverted with Mario in Episode 11 of ''Machinima/SmashKing''. His claim that he’s a friend of Bowser’s trying to help him fight off Ganondorf seems pretty substantiated for the most part, fooling both Wario and Meta Knight for a few minutes. However, Meta Knight's blue side quickly realizes something’s amiss when he takes into account that all of Bowser’s friends know where he lives, so the fact that Mario needs to be directed to his place of residence is nothing short of suspicious.

to:

* This is inverted with Mario in Episode 11 of ''Machinima/SmashKing''.''WebAnimation/SmashKing''. His claim that he’s a friend of Bowser’s trying to help him fight off Ganondorf seems pretty substantiated for the most part, fooling both Wario and Meta Knight for a few minutes. However, Meta Knight's blue side quickly realizes something’s amiss when he takes into account that all of Bowser’s friends know where he lives, so the fact that Mario needs to be directed to his place of residence is nothing short of suspicious.

Top