Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Main / ConceptsAreCheap

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** Even his powers and costume were different during the early years from what the character has come to be known as. That doesn't make it any more sensible to deviate radically from what the character has been for most of seven decades.

Changed: 414

Removed: 53

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** It also tends to coincide with American warcrimes.




to:

* Batman usually fights for an ill defined "Justice" like many of his contemporaries but in the current ''Dark Knight Trilogy'' much of the plot is about Bruce exploring, discovering and refining his concept of justice and his boundaries (for example, Lucius challenges him on his decision to implement an nigh-omnipresent security system throughout Gotham and Bruce decides to retire it after the current crisis.)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Spinning off from Prometheus comes the mini-series "Cry for Justice" where, suddenly, every single major character becomes this. They spend the entire series demanding "justice" without ever bothering to define what it means or how it's different from what the other heroes are already doing.

to:

** Spinning off from Prometheus comes the mini-series "Cry for Justice" "CryForJustice" where, suddenly, every single major character becomes this. They spend the entire series demanding "justice" without ever bothering to define what it means or how it's different from what the other heroes are already doing.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** Spinning off from Prometheus comes the mini-series "Cry for Justice" where, suddenly, every single major character becomes this. They spend the entire series demanding "justice" without ever bothering to define what it means or how it's different from what the other heroes are already doing.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* Parodied in ''Megamind'' with the "You can't trap justice..." riff.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''MetalWolfChaos'' has propaganda broadcasts from the Policy Promotion Department, making pronouncements like "A heart of '''Justice''' is a heart that loves '''Freedom'''." This is when they're not promising to execute everyone who's even tangentially connected to Metal Wolf.

to:

* ''MetalWolfChaos'' has propaganda broadcasts from the Policy Promotion Department, making pronouncements like "A heart of '''Justice''' is a heart that loves '''Freedom'''." This is when they're not promising to execute everyone who's even tangentially connected to Metal Wolf.
Wolf.
* Abraham Reyes from ''RedDeadRedemption'' gives speeches that have him throwing around rabble-rousing buzzwords such as "Freedom" and "For the people!" And while the people drink it up, it's obvious to Marston and the player that he's nothing more than a self-important blowhard. [[spoiler:You only get to see how fake he really is in the epilogue, when a newspaper blurb spells out to you that he's become a dictator.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Spelling.


** They are the good guys because they offer the option of not dying and instead joning their Orwellian dictatorship.

to:

** They are the good guys because they offer the option of not dying and instead joning joining their Orwellian dictatorship.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Spelling.


** It's even worse when you consider the {{Narm}} line from Episode III during the Anakin/Obi-Wan: "Anakin the Chancellor is evil!" "From my point of view the Jedi are evil!" which is just randomly throwing moral relativism in there for some extra drama, not because it actually fit (since there wasn't an indication Anakin actually though that before, aside from being ticked at how the council treated him).

to:

** It's even worse when you consider the {{Narm}} line from Episode III during the Anakin/Obi-Wan: "Anakin the Chancellor is evil!" "From my point of view the Jedi are evil!" which is just randomly throwing moral relativism in there for some extra drama, not because it actually fit (since there wasn't an indication Anakin actually though thought that before, aside from being ticked at how the council treated him).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Spelling.


*** Kind of. Originally Superman fought for truth and justice and was in a constant battle against evil. The Truth, Justice and the American Way part came in in the 40s for the radio program and it was more of an anti Nazi thing than an anti commie thing. Though it definatly became anti communist.

to:

*** Kind of. Originally Superman fought for truth and justice and was in a constant battle against evil. The Truth, Justice and the American Way part came in in the 40s for the radio program and it was more of an anti Nazi thing than an anti commie thing. Though it definatly definitely became anti communist.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:


Unrelated to HighConcept.

Added: 496

Changed: 305

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* Patrick Bateman in TheFilmOfTheBook ''AmericanPsycho'' gives a monologue on the important problems that we need to face, eventually dissolving into a bunch of vacuous rhetoric. Naturally, he doesn't actually care about these things, so his speech is just a huge Lampshade hung on the use of this trope.
-->'''Bateman:''' There's a lot more important problems than Sri Lanka to worry about. We have to end apartheid for one, slow down the nuclear arms race, stop terrorism and end world hunger. We have to provide food and shelter for the homeless and oppose racial discrimination and promote civil rights, while also promoting equal rights for women. We have to encourage a return to traditional moral values. But most importantly we have to promote general social concern, and less materialism.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Simply explaining Superman's tag line. Maybe I should get rid of the natter. Not sure. I'll leave it for another edititor to deside.

Added DiffLines:

*** Kind of. Originally Superman fought for truth and justice and was in a constant battle against evil. The Truth, Justice and the American Way part came in in the 40s for the radio program and it was more of an anti Nazi thing than an anti commie thing. Though it definatly became anti communist.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* One problem with GundamSEEDDestiny. On one hand, one ([[DecoyProtagonist possible]]) protagonist has the Destiny Gundam. And his opponents are piloting machines with the names Freedom and Justice.

to:

* One problem with GundamSEEDDestiny.''GundamSEEDDestiny''. On one hand, one ([[DecoyProtagonist possible]]) protagonist has the Destiny Gundam. And his opponents are piloting machines with the names Freedom and Justice.



* Fallout 3 gives us the DJ Three Dog who spouts off fighting the good fight while simultaneously being really really vague on what the good fight was.

to:

* Fallout 3 ''{{Fallout 3}}'' gives us the DJ Three Dog who spouts off fighting the good fight while simultaneously being really really vague on what the good fight was.



* Parodied in ''GrandTheftAutoIII" on the [[GTARadio Chatterbox radio station]]. A guy by the name of "Jeff" calls in, advertising a rally at Liberty City Park. However, when the show's host asks what the rally's actually about, Jeff responds with an escalation of otherwise meaningless phrases and appeals, including "for justice" "for the future," and "for hope." The host continues asking, only to be met with more cheap concepts and pleas for attendance, until it turns out the guy doesn't know what it's about.

to:

* Parodied in ''GrandTheftAutoIII" ''GrandTheftAutoIII'' on the [[GTARadio Chatterbox radio station]]. A guy by the name of "Jeff" calls in, advertising a rally at Liberty City Park. However, when the show's host asks what the rally's actually about, Jeff responds with an escalation of otherwise meaningless phrases and appeals, including "for justice" "for the future," and "for hope." The host continues asking, only to be met with more cheap concepts and pleas for attendance, until it turns out the guy doesn't know what it's about.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Fallout 3 gives us the DJ Three Dog who spouts off fighting the good fight while simultaneously being really really vague on what the good fight was.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** They are the good guys because they offer the option of not dying and instead joning their Orwellian dictatorship.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** It also tends to coincide with American warcrimes.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* More politicians than not, if not all politicians. It doesn't matter whether you're talking to the [[AmericanGunPolitics National Rifle Association or Handgun Control Inc]], the American Civil Liberties Union or an attorney general, everyone is for the protection of rights and has no problem with reasonable regulation. Those phrases means ''exactly'' nothing.

to:

* More politicians than not, if not all politicians. It doesn't matter whether you're talking to the [[AmericanGunPolitics [[UsefulNotes/AmericanGunPolitics National Rifle Association or Handgun Control Inc]], the American Civil Liberties Union or an attorney general, everyone is for the protection of rights and has no problem with reasonable regulation. Those phrases means ''exactly'' nothing.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In third edition DungeonsAndDragons, clerics can choose to devote themselves to some broad concepts rather than a deity. This allows the cleric to act pretty much however he or she wants as long it can be said to not violate the concept rather than worry about how his or her patron deity feels. Of course, some deity’s concepts can be just as cheap as those of patronless cleric, too.

to:

* In third edition DungeonsAndDragons, ''DungeonsAndDragons'', clerics can choose to devote themselves to some broad concepts rather than a deity. This allows the cleric to act pretty much however he or she wants as long it can be said to not violate the concept rather than worry about how his or her patron deity feels. Of course, some deity’s concepts can be just as cheap as those of patronless cleric, too.



** They also lampshade this mercilessly.

to:

** They also lampshade {{lampshade}} this mercilessly.




to:

* ''MetalWolfChaos'' has propaganda broadcasts from the Policy Promotion Department, making pronouncements like "A heart of '''Justice''' is a heart that loves '''Freedom'''." This is when they're not promising to execute everyone who's even tangentially connected to Metal Wolf.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Althought the ones obsessed with "freedom", "justice" and "liberty" tend to be Americans. In Europe, politicians tend to have more muted speeches (except when talking about other countries: then "democracy" and "human rights" pop up very frequently): they usually don't go further than "social equality", "citizenship", and "the republic" in the worst case (but that's from French Persident Sarkozy's administration, and that guy is very much into "american" methods). I think European leaders want to look more "dignified". There WAS a fad with "change" to try to copy Obama's vibe. But it settled very quickly...
** In Britain the current concepts are fairness and progressive. Every policy of the Tory parties in government is fair and progressive. Every policy of the Labour party in opposition is fair and progressive.

to:

* Althought * While the ones obsessed with invocation of "freedom", "justice" and "liberty" tend to be Americans. In Europe, Americans' preference, European, politicians tend to have make more muted speeches (except when talking about other countries: then "democracy" and "human rights" pop up very frequently): understated speeches: they usually don't go further than "social equality", "citizenship", and "the republic" in the worst case (but that's from French Persident Sarkozy's administration, and that guy is very much into "american" methods). I think European leaders want to look more "dignified". "American" methods). However, when talking about ''other'' countries, "democracy" and "human rights" pop up very frequently. There WAS was a fad with "change" to try to copy Obama's vibe. But vibe, but it settled very quickly...
quickly.
** In Britain the current concepts are fairness and progressive. progressiveness. Every policy of the Tory parties party in government is fair and progressive. Every policy of the Labour party in opposition is fair and progressive. The only way to tell them apart is that the Tries will occasionally throw in "[[ForGreatJustice justice]]" for good measure.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In the latest BBC series of ''Series/RobinHood'', the main character would often use King Richard as his rallying cry. This posed problems within the context of the show, which because of its modern PC sensibilities, took a negative stance against the Crusades. Therefore, the storylines ran on an odd paradox: King Richard was good, but his actions were bad. Many of the storylines revolved around trying to bring King Richard home, yet when the outlaws travel all the way to the Holy Land, Richard is revealed to be a rather weak, misguided King, raising questions as to why Robin was so slavishly devoted to him in the first place. The King even tries to have Robin and the gang executed, but by season three, everyone has reverted back to the mind-set of King Richard = good, peace, justice.

to:

* In the latest BBC series of ''Series/RobinHood'', the main character would often use [[RichardTheLionHeart King Richard Richard]] as his rallying cry. This posed problems within the context of the show, which because of its modern PC sensibilities, took a negative stance against the Crusades. Therefore, the storylines ran on an odd paradox: King Richard was good, but his actions were bad. Many of the storylines revolved around trying to bring King Richard home, yet when the outlaws travel all the way to the Holy Land, Richard is revealed to be a rather weak, misguided King, raising questions as to why Robin was so slavishly devoted to him in the first place. The King even tries to have Robin and the gang executed, but by season three, everyone has reverted back to the mind-set of King Richard = good, peace, justice.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Mohinder's voice-overs at the beginning of each episode of ''{{Heroes}}'' can be summed up thusly: "Destiny, blah, blah, blah, fate, blah, blah, blah, life, blah, blah, blah, heroes.

to:

* Mohinder's voice-overs at the beginning of each episode of ''{{Heroes}}'' can be summed up thusly: "Destiny, blah, blah, blah, fate, blah, blah, blah, life, blah, blah, blah, heroes.
life and all its mysteries, blah."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* Mohinder's voice-overs at the beginning of each episode of ''{{Heroes}}'' can be summed up thusly: "Destiny, blah, blah, blah, fate, blah, blah, blah, life, blah, blah, blah, heroes.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[AC: LiveActionTelevision]]
* In the latest BBC series of ''Series/RobinHood'', the main character would often use King Richard as his rallying cry. This posed problems within the context of the show, which because of its modern PC sensibilities, took a negative stance against the Crusades. Therefore, the storylines ran on an odd paradox: King Richard was good, but his actions were bad. Many of the storylines revolved around trying to bring King Richard home, yet when the outlaws travel all the way to the Holy Land, Richard is revealed to be a rather weak, misguided King, raising questions as to why Robin was so slavishly devoted to him in the first place. The King even tries to have Robin and the gang executed, but by season three, everyone has reverted back to the mind-set of King Richard = good, peace, justice.
Ironeye MOD

Changed: 15

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Trope renamed


* [[GoldenAge Back in the day]] ''{{Superman}}'' spent a lot of time demolishing substandard ghetto housing, exposing political corruption and standing up for the rights of immigrants and the little guy. He was a New Deal superhero! But politics is bad for sales - even corrupt politicians buy comic books, after all. So Superman started to fight for the magnificent generality of 'truth, justice and the American way', and so long as he restrains himself to hitting supervillains in the jaw, it doesn't matter. No two people can agree on what Superman 'really stands for' anymore, but they all agree it's ''very heroic''. "The American way" part is also often dropped in modern stories, although it's usually [[EagleLand only Americans who complain about this.]]

to:

* [[GoldenAge [[TheGoldenAgeOfComicBooks Back in the day]] ''{{Superman}}'' spent a lot of time demolishing substandard ghetto housing, exposing political corruption and standing up for the rights of immigrants and the little guy. He was a New Deal superhero! But politics is bad for sales - even corrupt politicians buy comic books, after all. So Superman started to fight for the magnificent generality of 'truth, justice and the American way', and so long as he restrains himself to hitting supervillains in the jaw, it doesn't matter. No two people can agree on what Superman 'really stands for' anymore, but they all agree it's ''very heroic''. "The American way" part is also often dropped in modern stories, although it's usually [[EagleLand only Americans who complain about this.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

**Despite the movie celebrating these concepts, it ''does'' end with [[spoiler:Satine dead and Christian living as a depressed, heavy-drinking, penniless and struggling writer, which is pretty much what his father warned him would happen if he ran off to Paris. You know, his unpleasant father he was trying to escape.]]

Changed: 309

Removed: 157

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Inverted by the morally gray characters of AlanMoore. V (''VForVendetta'') not only fights for "freedom", but puts into practice. In ''{{Watchmen}}'', Rorschach and Ozymandias, in very different ways and results, devote their entire lives to their ideals, at the cost of distancing themselves from the morality (and, in Rorschach's case, hygiene standards) of everyday folk. For his characters UtopiaJustifiesTheMeans and they sometimes cause the end of the current cycle of being, initiating a new one.
** Meaning, basically, that his comics sometimes feature super''villains'' (ie the Watchmen) with the same one word motivations as his super''heroes'' (ie V)

to:

* Inverted by the morally gray characters of AlanMoore. V (''VForVendetta'') not only fights for "freedom", but puts into practice. In ''{{Watchmen}}'', Rorschach and Ozymandias, in very different ways and results, devote their entire lives to their ideals, at the cost of distancing themselves from the morality (and, in Rorschach's case, hygiene standards) of everyday folk. For his characters Ozymandias firmly believes that UtopiaJustifiesTheMeans and they sometimes cause that a few million deaths to prevent the end ''rest'' of the current cycle of being, initiating a new one.
** Meaning, basically,
global population from dying is an acceptable sacrifice, while Rorschach believes that his comics sometimes feature super''villains'' (ie ''not even Utopia'' justifies the Watchmen) with means, and that global extinction under the same one word motivations as his super''heroes'' (ie V)truth is better than peace through a lie.

Changed: 36

Removed: 1356

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The Tau of ''WH40k'' are the good guys. Why are they the good guys? Because they serve "The Greater Good". What's "The Greater Good"? Um...
** Even more nebulous as the Greater Good tends to be whatever is best for the Tau race, and not always their allies. Although there's no directly Canon source flat out saying so, it's heavily implied that brainwashing, mind control and genocide for "The Greater Good" occurs. Even with that though, with the {{Crapsack World}} that ''WH40k'' is set in, they might still be the good guys by default.
** Soldiers of the Imperium of Man serve "Mankind", but that's not as nebulous a concept when there are aliens involved.
*** They're actually clear(er) about that (than the Tau, at least). They fight for the faction of the Imperium of Man, which is comprised entirely of humans. And those humans who are not with them are written off as mutants or heretics and thus need to be killed since most are liable to attack humans (or someone else, but it doesn't really matter since they're going to kill someone). And those ([[AMillionIsAStatistic few]]) people that are killed by the soldiers of the Imperium are killed for the sole purpose of ensuring the survival of the rest from what grave threat would still exist if the soldiers took the time to try something else.
**** That's not true, the Imperium has billions of human offshots, also most pykers are taken to be trained. Of course they all count as human (minus the Space Marines who are above human)

to:

* The Tau of ''WH40k'' are the good guys. Why are they the good guys? Because they serve "The Greater Good". What's "The Greater Good"? Um...
** Even more nebulous as the Greater Good tends to be whatever
This is best for the Tau race, and not always their allies. Although there's no directly Canon source flat out saying so, it's heavily implied that brainwashing, mind control and genocide for "The Greater Good" occurs. Even with that though, with the {{Crapsack World}} that ''WH40k'' is set in, they might still be the good guys by default.
** Soldiers of the Imperium of Man serve "Mankind", but that's not as nebulous a concept when there are aliens involved.
*** They're actually clear(er) about that (than the Tau, at least). They fight for the faction of the Imperium of Man, which is comprised entirely of humans. And those humans who are not with them are written off as mutants or heretics and thus need to be killed since most are liable to attack humans (or someone else, but it doesn't really matter since they're going to kill someone). And those ([[AMillionIsAStatistic few]]) people that are killed by the soldiers of the Imperium are killed for the sole purpose of ensuring the survival of the rest from what grave threat would still exist if the soldiers took the time to try something else.
**** That's not true, the Imperium has billions of human offshots, also most pykers are taken to be trained. Of course they all count as human (minus the Space Marines who are above human)
likely deliberate though.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


**** That's not true, the Imperium has billions of human offshots, also most pykers are taken to be trained. Of course they all count as human (minus the Space Marines who are above human)

to:

**** That's not true, the Imperium has billions of human offshots, also most pykers are taken to be trained. Of course they all count as human (minus the Space Marines who are above human)
human)
* In third edition DungeonsAndDragons, clerics can choose to devote themselves to some broad concepts rather than a deity. This allows the cleric to act pretty much however he or she wants as long it can be said to not violate the concept rather than worry about how his or her patron deity feels. Of course, some deity’s concepts can be just as cheap as those of patronless cleric, too.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Meaning, basically, that his comics sometimes feature super''villains'' (ie the Watchmen) with the same one word motivations as his super''heroes'' (ie V)

to:

* ** Meaning, basically, that his comics sometimes feature super''villains'' (ie the Watchmen) with the same one word motivations as his super''heroes'' (ie V)

Top