Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 49 (click to see context) from:
* After a certain ImageBoard post, it's become [[MemeticMutation memetic]] that any picture of [[[{{Futurama}} Farnsworth]] with the caption "[[CatchPhrase Good news, everyone!]]" will cause the viewer to read it in his voice.
to:
* After a certain ImageBoard post, it's become [[MemeticMutation memetic]] that any picture of [[[{{Futurama}} [[{{Futurama}} Farnsworth]] with the caption "[[CatchPhrase Good news, everyone!]]" will cause the viewer to read it in his voice.
Changed line(s) 56 (click to see context) from:
* StephenKing conceded that, after seeing JackNicholson as Randle P. McMurphy in ''OneFlewOverTheCuckoosNest'', there wasn't any other way of seeing the character when you read the novel. King cited it as a bad thing, however, as he claims it hobbles the reader's imagination to an extent.
to:
* StephenKing conceded that, after seeing JackNicholson as Randle P. McMurphy [=McMurphy=] in ''OneFlewOverTheCuckoosNest'', there wasn't any other way of seeing the character when you read the novel. King cited it as a bad thing, however, as he claims it hobbles the reader's imagination to an extent.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* StephenKing conceded that, after seeing JackNicholson as Randle P. McMurphy in ''OneFlewOverTheCuckoosNest'', there wasn't any other way of seeing the character when you read the novel. King cited it as a bad thing, however, as he claims it hobbles the reader's imagination to an extent.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Deleted a reference to SNL\'s Cowbell sketch. Not this trope.
Deleted line(s) 39 (click to see context) :
* The Cowbell. You know what I'm talking about.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 51 (click to see context) from:
** [[OldSpiceGuy Hello ladies.]]
to:
** [[OldSpiceGuy Hello ladies.]]Same thing with the Old Spice Guy.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* The Cowbell. You know what I'm talking about.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Cait Sith is not even vaguely Irish.
Added DiffLines:
**Actually a rubbish Scottish accent. "Lassie, shut your gob" will never naturally fall out the mouth of an Irishman, neither of the North nor the Republic.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** Also, Ian [=McKellen=] as Gandalf. His voice has become Gandalf's voice.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 37 (click to see context) from:
* Just ''try'' to read the lyrics to a song you know, and read them in your head as if they were poem and ''not'' to the tune of the song. [[ShmuckBait Just try it]].
to:
* Just ''try'' to read the lyrics to a song you know, and read them in your head as if they were a poem or spoken words and ''not'' to the tune of the song. [[ShmuckBait Just try it]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 38 (click to see context) from:
to:
[[/folder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
[[folder:Music]]
* Just ''try'' to read the lyrics to a song you know, and read them in your head as if they were poem and ''not'' to the tune of the song. [[ShmuckBait Just try it]].
* Just ''try'' to read the lyrics to a song you know, and read them in your head as if they were poem and ''not'' to the tune of the song. [[ShmuckBait Just try it]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 43 (click to see context) from:
* After a certain ImageBoard post, it's become [[MemeticMutation memetic]] that any picture of [[[{Futurama}} Farnsworth]] with the caption "[[CatchPhrase Good news, everyone!]]" will cause the viewer to read it in his voice.
to:
* After a certain ImageBoard post, it's become [[MemeticMutation memetic]] that any picture of [[[{Futurama}} [[[{{Futurama}} Farnsworth]] with the caption "[[CatchPhrase Good news, everyone!]]" will cause the viewer to read it in his voice.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 44 (click to see context) from:
to:
[[/folder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
[[folder:WesternAnimation]]
*After a certain ImageBoard post, it's become [[MemeticMutation memetic]] that any picture of [[[{Futurama}} Farnsworth]] with the caption "[[CatchPhrase Good news, everyone!]]" will cause the viewer to read it in his voice.
*After a certain ImageBoard post, it's become [[MemeticMutation memetic]] that any picture of [[[{Futurama}} Farnsworth]] with the caption "[[CatchPhrase Good news, everyone!]]" will cause the viewer to read it in his voice.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 9 (click to see context) from:
Not to be mistaken with BrainBleach.
to:
Not to be mistaken with BrainBleach. Also, [[IThoughtItMeant has nothing to do with]] {{Mondegreen}}s.
[[folder:{{Anime}} and {{Manga}}]]
* An often obscured argument in the old "dub vs. sub" wars is that some audience members prefer a character they ''largely can't understand'' simply because of voice intonation, while others prefer a newer interpretation if the original is seen as an overdone PigeonholedVoiceActor.
[[/folder]]
* An often obscured argument in the old "dub vs. sub" wars is that some audience members prefer a character they ''largely can't understand'' simply because of voice intonation, while others prefer a newer interpretation if the original is seen as an overdone PigeonholedVoiceActor.
[[/folder]]
Changed line(s) 28,29 (click to see context) from:
[[folder:{{Manga}} and {{Anime}}]]
* An often obscured argument in the old "dub vs. sub" wars is that some audience members prefer a character they ''largely can't understand'' simply because of voice intonation, while others prefer a newer interpretation if the original is seen as an overdone PigeonholedVoiceActor.
* An often obscured argument in the old "dub vs. sub" wars is that some audience members prefer a character they ''largely can't understand'' simply because of voice intonation, while others prefer a newer interpretation if the original is seen as an overdone PigeonholedVoiceActor.
to:
*
Deleted line(s) 32,35 (click to see context) :
[[folder:Audio Books]]
* This troper cannot unhear some of the voices JimDale gives the characters of the HarryPotter universe. Snape and Umbridge being the worst offenders.
[[/folder]]
* This troper cannot unhear some of the voices JimDale gives the characters of the HarryPotter universe. Snape and Umbridge being the worst offenders.
[[/folder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
[[folder:Audio Books]]
* This troper cannot unhear some of the voices JimDale gives the characters of the HarryPotter universe. Snape and Umbridge being the worst offenders.
[[/folder]]
* This troper cannot unhear some of the voices JimDale gives the characters of the HarryPotter universe. Snape and Umbridge being the worst offenders.
[[/folder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* Regardless of your opinion on the TV adaptation on ''TerryPratchett's {{Discworld/Hogfather}}'', Michelle Dockery and Marc Warren's performances as, respectively, Susan Sto Helit and Jonathan Teatime are probably going to be definitive. [[PsychopathicManchild Especially]] [[PsychoForHire Teatime]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** This has led to a problem for this troper who, when she found out the Rickman had played Col. Brandon in Sense and Sensibility, could not read the book without hearing his voice.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* Alan Rickman's performance as Snape in ''Film/HarryPotter'' was so good even J.K. Rowling couldn't unhear it eventually.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** And I know I'm not the only one who hears Kevin Conroy's Batman.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** [[TroperTales/CantUnHearIt Tell us, people!]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
*The roaring, gravelly George C. Scott's legendary performance as the titular general in ''Patton'' completely belies the real-life George S. Patton's weak, thin voice, which served to make the general somewhat unfond of oration.
Added DiffLines:
* In ''{{Final Fantasy VII}},'' the character Cait Sith was a robotic cat with no discernible idiosyncrasies in speech or diction, expressed or implied. As of the fully-voiced 'Compilation' entries, however, Cait Sith has an Irish accent thicker than coddle and Guinness served in a pot o' gold and stirred with a shillelagh. It's also about as pleasant to hear as a herd of goats vomiting onto a thin tin roof.
Added DiffLines:
[[folder:Real Life]]
*Who ''hasn't'' ever read a book or an unvoiced game, only to have your preconceived and often cherished notions of the characters' speech or their delivery of pivotal lines and moments just shattered by an adaptation, sequel or update years down the road? The ones you can't ever unhear are the ones only ''you'' ever heard.
[[/folder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 7 (click to see context) from:
This is a SubjectiveTrope, of course....
to:
This is a SubjectiveTrope, of course....course...
Not to be mistaken with BrainBleach.
Not to be mistaken with BrainBleach.
Changed line(s) 13 (click to see context) from:
[[folder:Comics]]
to:
Changed line(s) 17 (click to see context) from:
[[folder:Film]]
to:
Changed line(s) 21 (click to see context) from:
[[folder:Manga and Anime]]
to:
Changed line(s) 25 (click to see context) from:
[[folder:Video Games]]
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
[[folder:Comics]]
* Regardless of which version you think is best, MarkHamill's [[BatmanTheAnimatedSeries interpretation]] of TheJoker is often the one comics fans will hear in their heads when reading his lines.
[[/folder]]
* Regardless of which version you think is best, MarkHamill's [[BatmanTheAnimatedSeries interpretation]] of TheJoker is often the one comics fans will hear in their heads when reading his lines.
[[/folder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3,8 (click to see context) from:
Movies are frequently cited (accused) as creating the assumed voice of a character even when there's no objective reason this should occur (i.e., it is simply the actor's normal voice or an actor doing their own interpretation). If the work is ''frequently'' adapted, this is usually based on the most popular actor portraying the role. Many writers do in fact "hear" and "see" their characters but generally don't feel the need to enforce this view on the audience except in BroadStrokes.
Interestingly, why one voice is locked into our minds may not be related to how good, official, or genuine it is. It might be the "offical" or mainstream interpretation is seen as pretty terrible or ingenuous by the observer. Maybe the audience remembers an obscure adaptation which existed as the sole version until recently as a childhood memory, or maybe there was something merely memorable (or infamous) about said "voice".
This is a SubjectiveTrope of course....
Interestingly, why one voice is locked into our minds may not be related to how good, official, or genuine it is. It might be the "offical" or mainstream interpretation is seen as pretty terrible or ingenuous by the observer. Maybe the audience remembers an obscure adaptation which existed as the sole version until recently as a childhood memory, or maybe there was something merely memorable (or infamous) about said "voice".
This is a SubjectiveTrope of course....
to:
Movies are frequently cited (accused) as creating the assumed voice of a character even when there's no objective reason this should occur (i.e.(e.g., it is simply the actor's normal voice or an actor doing their his own interpretation). If the work is ''frequently'' adapted, this is usually based on the most popular actor portraying the role. Many writers do in fact "hear" and "see" their characters but generally don't feel the need to enforce this view on the audience except in BroadStrokes.
Interestingly, why one voice is locked into our minds may not be related to how good,official, official or genuine it is. It might be that the "offical" "official" or mainstream interpretation is seen as pretty terrible or ingenuous disingenuous by the observer. Maybe the audience remembers an obscure adaptation which existed as the sole version until recently as a childhood memory, or maybe there was something merely memorable (or infamous) about said "voice".
"voice".
This is aSubjectiveTrope SubjectiveTrope, of course....
Interestingly, why one voice is locked into our minds may not be related to how good,
This is a
Deleted line(s) 14 (click to see context) :
Changed line(s) 16 (click to see context) from:
* Sean Astin's distinctive accent for Samwise Gamgee in the LordOfTheRings film is very similar to one of the most famous ([[LostWork extant]]) audio narrations of the book, though the actor claims he wasn't aware of the audio version. Eeriely, Sam is never actually written with such an accent in the book, making it all the weirder.
to:
* Sean Astin's distinctive accent for Samwise Gamgee in the LordOfTheRings film ''LordOfTheRings'' films is very similar to one of the most famous ([[LostWork extant]]) (extant) audio narrations of the book, though the actor Astin claims he wasn't aware of the audio version. Eeriely, Eerily, Sam is never actually written with such an accent in the book, books, making it all the weirder.
Changed line(s) 20 (click to see context) from:
* An often obscured arguement in old DubVsSub wars is audience members sometimes prefer a character they ''largely can't understand'' simply because of voice intonation, while others prefer a newer interpretation if the original is seen as an overdone PigeonHoledVoiceActor.
to:
* An often obscured arguement argument in the old DubVsSub "dub vs. sub" wars is that some audience members sometimes prefer a character they ''largely can't understand'' simply because of voice intonation, while others prefer a newer interpretation if the original is seen as an overdone PigeonHoledVoiceActor.PigeonholedVoiceActor.
Changed line(s) 24 (click to see context) from:
* ''TheSuperMarioBrosSuperShow'' gave the then-VoiceLess plumbers accents based on the show's assumed backstory. For many older fans, LouAlbano's deep but friendly Mario voice still trumps the official "squeaky" one being marketed.
to:
* ''TheSuperMarioBrosSuperShow'' ''TheSuperMarioBrothersSuperShow'' gave the then-VoiceLess plumbers then-voiceless Mario and Luigi accents based on the backstory assumed by the show's assumed backstory. writers. For many older fans, LouAlbano's Captain Lou Albano's deep but friendly Mario voice still trumps the official "squeaky" one by Charles Martinet being marketed.marketed by {{Nintendo}}.
* Has anyone since 1982 been able to play ''{{Pac-Man}}'' and not think of Marty Ingels?
* Has anyone since 1982 been able to play ''{{Pac-Man}}'' and not think of Marty Ingels?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 9,10 (click to see context) from:
----------------
to:
* Sean Astin's distinctive accent for Samwise Gamgee in the LordOfTheRings film is very similar to one of the most famous ([[LostWork extant]]) audio narrations of the book, though the actor claims he wasn't aware of the audio version. Eeriely, Sam is never actually written with such an accent in the book, making it all the weirder.
Changed line(s) 18,22 (click to see context) from:
* Sean Astin's distinctive accent for Samwise Gamgee in the LordOfTheRings film is very similar to one of the most famous ([[LostWork extant]]) audio narrations of the book, though the actor claims he wasn't aware of the audio version. Eeriely, Sam is never actually written with such an accent in the book, making it all the weirder.
[[folder:Folk Lore]]
[[/folder]]
[[folder:Folk Lore]]
[[/folder]]
to:
[[folder:Folk Lore]]
[[/folder]]
* An often obscured arguement in old DubVsSub wars is audience members sometimes prefer a character they ''largely can't understand'' simply because of voice intonation, while others prefer a newer interpretation if the original is seen as an overdone PigeonHoledVoiceActor.
Changed line(s) 25,26 (click to see context) from:
* An often obscured arguement in old DubVsSub wars is audience members sometimes prefer a character they ''largely can't understand'' simply because of voice intonation, while others prefer a newer interpretation if the original is seen as an overdone PigeonHoledVoiceActor.
to:
* ''TheSuperMarioBrosSuperShow'' gave the then-VoiceLess plumbers accents based on the show's assumed backstory. For many older fans, LouAlbano's deep but friendly Mario voice still trumps the official "squeaky" one being marketed.
Changed line(s) 29 (click to see context) from:
* ''TheSuperMarioBrosSuperShow'' gave the then-VoiceLess plumbers accents based on the show's assumed backstory. For many older fans, LouAlbano's deep but friendly Mario voice still trumps the official "squeaky" one being marketed.
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 18,19 (click to see context) from:
* Sean Austin's distinctive accent for Samwise Gamgee in the LordOfTheRings film is very similar to one of the most famous ([[LostWork extant]]) audio narrations of the book, though the actor claims he wasn't aware of the audio version. Eeriely, Sam is never actually written with such an accent in the book, making it all the weirder.
to:
* Sean Austin's Astin's distinctive accent for Samwise Gamgee in the LordOfTheRings film is very similar to one of the most famous ([[LostWork extant]]) audio narrations of the book, though the actor claims he wasn't aware of the audio version. Eeriely, Sam is never actually written with such an accent in the book, making it all the weirder.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1,7 (click to see context) from:
The tendancy when enjoying a story to "read" or "hear" a character's voice depending on the observer's preference. More frequent when a character does not or [[SuddenlyVoiced did not]] offically have a voice (such as a book), especially until some much later adaptation.
Movies are frequently cited (accused) as creating the assumed voice of a character even when there's no objective reason this should occur (i.e., it is simply the actor's normal voice or an actor doing their own interpretation). If the work is ''frequently'' adapted, this is usually based on the most popular actor portraying the rol. Many writers do in fact "hear" and "see" their characters but generally don't feel the need to enforce this view on the audience except in BroadStrokes.
Interestingly, why one voice is locked into our minds may not be related to how good, offical, or genuine it is. It might be the "offical" or mainstream interpretation is seen as pretty terrible or ingenuine by the observer. Maybe the audience remembers an obscure adaptation which existed as the sole version until recently as a childhood memory, or maybe there was something merely memorable (or infamous) about said "voice".
Movies are frequently cited (accused) as creating the assumed voice of a character even when there's no objective reason this should occur (i.e., it is simply the actor's normal voice or an actor doing their own interpretation). If the work is ''frequently'' adapted, this is usually based on the most popular actor portraying the rol. Many writers do in fact "hear" and "see" their characters but generally don't feel the need to enforce this view on the audience except in BroadStrokes.
Interestingly, why one voice is locked into our minds may not be related to how good, offical, or genuine it is. It might be the "offical" or mainstream interpretation is seen as pretty terrible or ingenuine by the observer. Maybe the audience remembers an obscure adaptation which existed as the sole version until recently as a childhood memory, or maybe there was something merely memorable (or infamous) about said "voice".
to:
The tendancy tendency when enjoying a story to "read" or "hear" a character's voice depending on the observer's preference. More frequent when a character does not or [[SuddenlyVoiced did not]] offically officially have a voice (such as a book), especially until some much later adaptation.
Movies are frequently cited (accused) as creating the assumed voice of a character even when there's no objective reason this should occur (i.e., it is simply the actor's normal voice or an actor doing their own interpretation). If the work is ''frequently'' adapted, this is usually based on the most popular actor portraying therol.role. Many writers do in fact "hear" and "see" their characters but generally don't feel the need to enforce this view on the audience except in BroadStrokes.
Interestingly, why one voice is locked into our minds may not be related to how good,offical, official, or genuine it is. It might be the "offical" or mainstream interpretation is seen as pretty terrible or ingenuine ingenuous by the observer. Maybe the audience remembers an obscure adaptation which existed as the sole version until recently as a childhood memory, or maybe there was something merely memorable (or infamous) about said "voice".
Movies are frequently cited (accused) as creating the assumed voice of a character even when there's no objective reason this should occur (i.e., it is simply the actor's normal voice or an actor doing their own interpretation). If the work is ''frequently'' adapted, this is usually based on the most popular actor portraying the
Interestingly, why one voice is locked into our minds may not be related to how good,
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
Click the edit button to start this new page.
to:
Movies are frequently cited (accused) as creating the assumed voice of a character even when there's no objective reason this
Interestingly, why one voice is locked into our minds may not be related to how good, offical, or genuine it is. It might be the "offical" or mainstream interpretation is seen as pretty terrible or ingenuine by the observer. Maybe the audience remembers an obscure adaptation which existed as the sole version until recently as a childhood memory, or maybe there was something merely memorable (or infamous) about said "voice".
This is a SubjectiveTrope of course....
----------------
!!Examples:
[[foldercontrol]]
[[folder:Film]]
[[/folder]]
* Sean Austin's distinctive accent for Samwise Gamgee in the LordOfTheRings film is very similar to one of the most famous ([[LostWork extant]]) audio narrations of the book, though the actor claims he wasn't aware of the audio version. Eeriely, Sam is never actually written with such an accent in the book, making it all the weirder.
[[folder:Folk Lore]]
[[/folder]]
[[folder:Manga and Anime]]
[[/folder]]
* An often obscured arguement in old DubVsSub wars is audience members sometimes prefer a character they ''largely can't understand'' simply because of voice intonation, while others prefer a newer interpretation if the original is seen as an overdone PigeonHoledVoiceActor.
[[folder:Video Games]]
[[/folder]]
* ''TheSuperMarioBrosSuperShow'' gave the then-VoiceLess plumbers accents based on the show's assumed backstory. For many older fans, LouAlbano's deep but friendly Mario voice still trumps the official "squeaky" one being marketed.