Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Literature / ThePrince

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* FollowTheLeader: [[invoked]] Machiavelli advises the reader to read the histories of great leaders, such as Cyrus the Great or Hiero II of Syracuse, and learn the ways they used to get and kept power, but also learn what mistakes they made, so that you don't makes them as well.

to:

* FollowTheLeader: [[invoked]] Machiavelli advises the reader to read the histories of great leaders, such as Cyrus the Great or Hiero II of Syracuse, and learn the ways they used to get and kept power, but also as well learn what the mistakes they made, might have made so that you don't the reader won't makes them as well.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CrushingThePopulace: One of the two advices Machiavelli gives about how to deal with a recently conquered, former republics - the other advice being that the conqueror actively settles in on his newly conquered lands - as the native population most likely wont forget their former freedom and will continue to rebel against their new masters. Concerning newly conquered, non-republican kingdoms he gives out a more lenient advice of saving that crushing only to the ruling dynasty; afterward you should immedaitely replace yourself as the new king of the lands and allow the natives to continue live out their lives as before, with a few changes of policies.

to:

* CrushingThePopulace: One of the two advices Machiavelli gives about how to deal with a recently conquered, former republics - the other advice being that the conqueror actively settles in on his newly conquered lands - as the native population most likely wont forget their former freedom and will continue to rebel against their new masters. Concerning newly conquered, non-republican kingdoms he gives out a more lenient advice of saving that crushing only to the ruling dynasty; afterward you should immedaitely immediately replace yourself as the new king of the lands and allow the natives to continue live out their lives as before, with a few changes of policies.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CrushingThePopulace: One of the two advices Machiavelli gives about how to deal with a recently conquered, former republic - the other advice being that the conqueror actively settles in on his newly conquered lands - as the native population most likely wont forget their former freedom and will continue to rebel against their new masters. Concerning newly conquered, non-republican kingdoms he gives out a more lenient advice of saving that crushing only to the ruling dynasty; afterward you should immedaitely replace yourself as the new king of the lands and allow the natives to continue live out their lives as before, with a few changes of policies.

to:

* CrushingThePopulace: One of the two advices Machiavelli gives about how to deal with a recently conquered, former republic republics - the other advice being that the conqueror actively settles in on his newly conquered lands - as the native population most likely wont forget their former freedom and will continue to rebel against their new masters. Concerning newly conquered, non-republican kingdoms he gives out a more lenient advice of saving that crushing only to the ruling dynasty; afterward you should immedaitely replace yourself as the new king of the lands and allow the natives to continue live out their lives as before, with a few changes of policies.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BadBoss: Machiavelli advises you to use both this trope and BenevolentBoss. You should be harsh enough to keep your subordinates in order and fear, but you also must be benevolent enough to them that they will be loyal to you. In short, Machiavelli advises you to be a ''pragmatic'' boss.

to:

* BadBoss: Machiavelli advises you to use both this trope and BenevolentBoss. You should be harsh enough to keep your subordinates in order and fear, but you also must be benevolent enough to them that they will be loyal to you. In short, Machiavelli advises you to be a ''pragmatic'' boss.boss who's able to master both the whip and the carrot when the situation demands which for him to use and when.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* SelfMadeMan: If you plan to take power through your own guts, skills and will alone, and with minimal to no help from stronger factions, you'll have to fight long and hard to get it but if you succeed with it, you'll have it easy to rule, since your efforts more likely will inspire true and sincere loyalty and respect from your followers and subjects. If you got the power handed to you on a silver plate, you'll find it easy to gain it but hard to keep it, since the easy way in doesn't inspire any true loyalty or respect from your subjects, and there's a chance that those who gave it to you will take it back if they think you don't do well enough.

to:

* SelfMadeMan: If you plan to take power through your own guts, skills and will alone, and with minimal to no help from stronger factions, you'll you might have to fight long longer and hard harder to get it claime it, but if you do succeed with it, you'll have it easy much easier to rule, since your hard-earned efforts more likely will inspire true and sincere loyalty and respect from your followers and subjects. If you got the you'd that power handed to you on a silver plate, you'll find it easy easier to gain it but hard harder to keep it, keep, since the easy that easier way in doesn't won't inspire any true loyalty or respect from your subjects, and there's a chance that those who gave it to you will take it back if they think you don't do well enough.enough in their taste.



* SummonBiggerFish: Should be used with caution, because if you as a prince of a smaller principality [[GondorCallsForAid summons the aid of a much more powerful one in the time of need; especially during times of war]], then they can use your debt to them afterward as a pretext to reduce you to their dependent vassal. Therefore, the prince should learn to keep his principality as self-reliant as possible and only ask for the aid of the much bigger nation as a last resort.

to:

* SummonBiggerFish: Should be used with caution, because if you as a prince of a smaller principality [[GondorCallsForAid summons the aid of a much more powerful one in the time of need; especially during times of war]], then they can use your debt to them afterward as a pretext to reduce you to as their dependent vassal. Therefore, the prince should learn to keep his principality as self-reliant as possible and only ask for the aid of the much bigger nation as a last resort.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* SummonBiggerFish: Should be used with caution, because if you as a prince of a smaller principality [[GondorCallsForAid summons the aid of a much more powerful one in the time of need; especially during times of war]], then they can use your debt to them afterward as a pretext to reduce you to their dependent vassal. Therefore, the prince should learn to keep his principality self-reliant as possible and only ask for the aid of the much bigger nation as a last resort.

to:

* SummonBiggerFish: Should be used with caution, because if you as a prince of a smaller principality [[GondorCallsForAid summons the aid of a much more powerful one in the time of need; especially during times of war]], then they can use your debt to them afterward as a pretext to reduce you to their dependent vassal. Therefore, the prince should learn to keep his principality as self-reliant as possible and only ask for the aid of the much bigger nation as a last resort.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CrushingThePopulace: One of the two advices Machiavelli gives about how to deal with a recently conquered, former republic - the other advice being that the conqueror actively settles in on his newly conquered lands - as the native population most likely wont forget their former freedom and will continue to rebel against their new masters. Concerning newly conquered, non-republican kingdoms he gives out a more lenient advice of saving that crushing only to the ruling dynasty, therefore you should then replace yourself as the new king of the lands and allow the natives to continue live out their lives as before, with a few changes of policies.

to:

* CrushingThePopulace: One of the two advices Machiavelli gives about how to deal with a recently conquered, former republic - the other advice being that the conqueror actively settles in on his newly conquered lands - as the native population most likely wont forget their former freedom and will continue to rebel against their new masters. Concerning newly conquered, non-republican kingdoms he gives out a more lenient advice of saving that crushing only to the ruling dynasty, therefore dynasty; afterward you should then immedaitely replace yourself as the new king of the lands and allow the natives to continue live out their lives as before, with a few changes of policies.



%%* TheUnfettered

to:

%%* TheUnfettered* TheUnfettered: The prince should be ready to use lethal, even outright immoral, force when the situation demands it. Because in the field of politics, one with too much of a merciful heart won't last long on the throne; even less so if he's unarmed.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* SummonBiggerFish: Should be used with caution, because if you as a prince of a smaller principality [[GondorCallsForAid summons the aid of a much more powerful one in the time of need; especially during times of war]], then they can use your debt to them afterward as a pretext to reduce you to their dependent vassal. Therefore, the prince should learn to keep his principality self-reliant as possible and only ask for the aid of the much bigger nation as a last resort.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* WarriorPrince: Fighting on the front lines alongside with your troops is a great way to boost positive PR, especially among the soldiers, who're the one social group whose loyalty and allegiance is the most important to earn and keep for your guaranteed stay in power.

to:

* WarriorPrince: Fighting on the front lines alongside with your troops is a great way to boost positive PR, especially among amongst the soldiers, who're the one social group whose loyalty and allegiance is the most important to earn and keep for your guaranteed stay in power.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CrushingThePopulace: One of the two advices Machiavelli gives about how to deal with a recently conquered, former republic - the other advice being that the conqueror actively settles in on his newly conquered lands - as the native population most likely wont forget their former freedom and will continue to rebel against their new masters.

to:

* CrushingThePopulace: One of the two advices Machiavelli gives about how to deal with a recently conquered, former republic - the other advice being that the conqueror actively settles in on his newly conquered lands - as the native population most likely wont forget their former freedom and will continue to rebel against their new masters. Concerning newly conquered, non-republican kingdoms he gives out a more lenient advice of saving that crushing only to the ruling dynasty, therefore you should then replace yourself as the new king of the lands and allow the natives to continue live out their lives as before, with a few changes of policies.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* CrushingThePopulace: One of the two advices Machiavelli gives about how to deal with a recently conquered, former republic - the other advice being that the conqueror actively settles in on his newly conquered lands - as the native population most likely wont forget their former freedom and will continue to rebel against their new masters.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* MachiavelliWasWrong: Ironically, [[UnbuiltTrope the work that codified the trope was also the one that deconstructed it]]; the book says that, yes, it ''is'' safer to be feared than loved, but the book also goes out of their way to tell that ''this should only be chosen if it is impossible to be both'', and in any event ''one must also avoid being hated''.

Added: 309

Removed: 314

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Hundred Percent Adoration Rating was renamed Universally Beloved Leader. If an example was removed, it probably did not fit as written


* HundredPercentAdorationRating: Machiavelli says that being universally loved would be ideal for a ruler, but it isn't a very realistic goal because of limited resources and human nature. You should earn a reputation for being strict but fair instead of bankrupting yourself in vain by trying to please everybody.


Added DiffLines:

* UniversallyBelovedLeader: Machiavelli says that being universally loved would be ideal for a ruler, but it isn't a very realistic goal because of limited resources and human nature. You should earn a reputation for being strict but fair instead of bankrupting yourself in vain by trying to please everybody.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* WarriorPrince: Fighting on the front lines alongside with your troops is a great way to boost positive PR, especially among the soldiers.

to:

* WarriorPrince: Fighting on the front lines alongside with your troops is a great way to boost positive PR, especially among the soldiers.soldiers, who're the one social group whose loyalty and allegiance is the most important to earn and keep for your guaranteed stay in power.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[PopculturalOsmosis Most people]] are familiar with Machiavelli as the man who said, "[[BeamMeUpScotty it is better to]] [[PopCulturalOsmosis be feared than loved]]". Over the years Machiavelli's name has become associated with [[DidYouActuallyBelieve dishonesty]], [[ChronicBackStabbingDisorder deceit]], and [[TheUnfettered ruthlessness]], so much that they even made his name an adjective most often used for unsavoury characters. However, Machiavelli repeats that while it is better for one to inspire fear, one should ''also'' try to inspire love, and must also remember not to [[ZeroPercentApprovalRating inspire hatred]]. A very common mistake people make is to conflate, "Be pragmatic," with, "Be an asshole." Everything a leader says and does need not automatically be a duplicitous front. A leader is perfectly free to have ideals, and be kind, generous, and just with their subjects. The main point is that if achieving one's goals means the leader ''must'' commit unsavoury acts, then they must do it. Going down in flames with your ideals intact is a fine and noble thing to do - some may say it is a moral obligation - but that is ''not'' the point of this book. ''The Prince'' should be regarded as a guidebook to maintaining power for the good of the prince and [[WellIntentionedExtremist ultimately the state]], ''not'' how to [[KickTheDog kick puppies left and right.]]

to:

[[PopculturalOsmosis Most people]] are familiar with Machiavelli as the man who said, "[[BeamMeUpScotty it is better to]] [[PopCulturalOsmosis be feared than loved]]". Over the years Machiavelli's name has become associated with [[DidYouActuallyBelieve dishonesty]], [[ChronicBackStabbingDisorder deceit]], and [[TheUnfettered ruthlessness]], so much that they even made his name an adjective most often used for unsavoury characters. However, Machiavelli repeats that while it is better for one to inspire fear, one should ''also'' try to inspire love, and must also remember not to [[ZeroPercentApprovalRating inspire hatred]]. A very common mistake people make is to conflate, "Be pragmatic," with, "Be conflate "be pragmatic" with "be an asshole." asshole". Everything a leader says and does need not automatically be a duplicitous front. A leader is perfectly free to have ideals, and be kind, generous, and just with their subjects. The main point is that if achieving one's goals means the leader ''must'' commit unsavoury acts, then they must do it. Going down in flames with your ideals intact is a fine and noble thing to do - -- some may say it is a moral obligation - -- but that is ''not'' the point of this book. ''The Prince'' should be regarded as a guidebook to maintaining power for the good of the prince and [[WellIntentionedExtremist ultimately the state]], ''not'' how to [[KickTheDog kick puppies left and right.]]



As of note, "Prince" (or "principe" in the original Italian) at the time just meant "ruler", more or less (from Latin "princeps" = "first one"). [[JustForFun/IThoughtItMeant It didn't mean "the son of a king"]]. If there was only one person in the state who really mattered, it was called a monarchy. Even a democratically elected president would have still been called a "Principe".

to:

As of note, "Prince" 'Prince' (or "principe" ''principe'' in the original Italian) at the time just meant "ruler", more or less (from Latin "princeps" ''princeps'' = "first one"). [[JustForFun/IThoughtItMeant It didn't mean "the son of a king"]]. If there was only one person in the state who really mattered, it was called a monarchy. Even a democratically elected president would have still been called a "Principe".''Principe''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Removal of What An Idiot potholes


* IdiotBall: Cited as something not to hold onto. Louis XII of France is [[InUniverse cited as a prime example]] of how to ''not'' screw with another country effectively, and in Chapter 3 Machiavelli calls out [[WhatAnIdiot Louis on his idiocy]], and shows how his treatment of the lesser powerful states would lead to them pushing the French back out of Italy, and tells us that for all the force used to take down Naples, he would lose it as quickly as he'd gained it. Machiavelli says that had Louis taken a pragmatic approach in Italy, not shared power with the Spanish, and aided those less powerful than he, he may well have held onto Italy for quite some time.

to:

* IdiotBall: Cited as something not to hold onto. Louis XII of France is [[InUniverse cited as a prime example]] of how to ''not'' screw with another country effectively, and in Chapter 3 Machiavelli calls out [[WhatAnIdiot Louis on his idiocy]], idiocy, and shows how his treatment of the lesser powerful states would lead to them pushing the French back out of Italy, and tells us that for all the force used to take down Naples, he would lose it as quickly as he'd gained it. Machiavelli says that had Louis taken a pragmatic approach in Italy, not shared power with the Spanish, and aided those less powerful than he, he may well have held onto Italy for quite some time.

Changed: 152

Removed: 151

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Seems kinda up for debate if the book recommends being extremely self-centered, but it does seem to work on the assumption that people generally act that way


* ItsAllAboutMe: ''The Prince'' takes the healthy individualism of the Renaissance to the extreme.
** Possibly, though also can be seen as a subversion. It's less about doing it for oneself but doing it for the common good as well. See PragmaticHero.

to:

* ItsAllAboutMe: ''The Prince'' takes the healthy individualism of the Renaissance to the extreme.
** Possibly, though also can be seen as a subversion. It's less
Subjects and rivals only care about doing it for oneself but doing it for the common their own self-interests, and a good as well. See PragmaticHero.prince should know how to exploit this trope.



* PragmaticHero: What being a prince ultimately should be. Though Machiavelli suggests ruthless thing, all of it is to the end of protecting one's people and ensuring their prosperity instead of being a self-centered tyrant.

to:

* PragmaticHero: What being a prince ultimately should be. Though Machiavelli suggests ruthless thing, things, all of it is to the end of protecting one's people and ensuring their prosperity instead of being a self-centered tyrant.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CassandraTruth: Machiavelli spends a lot of time talking about how patriotic soldiers with genuine loyalty to the prince and the state are going to be more reliable than mercenaries who only care about payment. The Medicis ignored his advice, continued to rely on mercenaries and utterly failed to unite Italy. Three and a half centuries later, the UsefulNotes/WarsOfItalianUnification finally united all of Italy, in no small part due to the efforts of Italian patriots.

to:

* CassandraTruth: Machiavelli spends a lot of time talking about how patriotic soldiers with genuine loyalty to the prince and the state are going to be more reliable than mercenaries who only care about payment. The Medicis ignored his advice, continued to rely on mercenaries and utterly failed to unite Italy. Three About three and a half centuries later, the UsefulNotes/WarsOfItalianUnification UsefulNotes/WarsOfItalianIndependence finally united all of Italy, in no small part due to the efforts of Italian patriots.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* CassandraTruth: Machiavelli spends a lot of time talking about how patriotic soldiers with genuine loyalty to the prince and the state are going to be more reliable than mercenaries who only care about payment. The Medicis ignored his advice, continued to rely on mercenaries and utterly failed to unite Italy. Three and a half centuries later, the UsefulNotes/WarsOfItalianUnification finally united all of Italy, in no small part due to the efforts of Italian patriots.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BetterToKillThanFrighten: Discussed. Machiavelli recommends killing political enemies rather than trying to intimidate them as blackmailing them may just give them enough motivation and/or ammunition to use against you.

to:

* BetterToKillThanFrighten: Discussed. Machiavelli recommends killing political enemies rather than trying to intimidate them or blackmail them, as blackmailing them that may just give them enough motivation and/or ammunition to use it against you.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* BetterToKillThanFrighten: Discussed. Machiavelli recommends killing political enemies rather than trying to intimidate them as blackmailing them may just give them enough motivation and/or ammunition to use against you.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Removing unapproved Magnificent Bastard wick.


Written by Italian statesman Creator/NiccoloMachiavelli in 1513, ''The Prince'' (''Il Principe'') is the single most famous political treatise and the first entirely secular work of UsefulNotes/TheRenaissance. At the time it was first published, ''The Prince'' was seen as extremely scandalous for its endorsement of ruthlessness and amorality. Nevertheless, it quickly became popular with politicians and remains highly influential in Western politics today. If there's any MagnificentBastard in ''anything'' set after the Renaissance, it's very probable he's taken cues from this book.[[note]]Although they aren't quite as likely to actually have an in depth knowledge of the book as much as a pop-culture impression. However, it should noted that many fascists during the 19th and 20th centuries were mostly inspired by this work, as many fascist dictators such as Hitler and Mussolini kept a copy of this work, the latter even wrote a thesis relating to this work.[[/note]]

to:

Written by Italian statesman Creator/NiccoloMachiavelli in 1513, ''The Prince'' (''Il Principe'') is the single most famous political treatise and the first entirely secular work of UsefulNotes/TheRenaissance. At the time it was first published, ''The Prince'' was seen as extremely scandalous for its endorsement of ruthlessness and amorality. Nevertheless, it quickly became popular with politicians and remains highly influential in Western politics today. If there's any MagnificentBastard ManipulativeBastard in ''anything'' set after the Renaissance, it's very probable he's taken cues from this book.[[note]]Although they aren't quite as likely to actually have an in depth knowledge of the book as much as a pop-culture impression. However, it should noted that many fascists during the 19th and 20th centuries were mostly inspired by this work, as many fascist dictators such as Hitler and Mussolini kept a copy of this work, the latter even wrote a thesis relating to this work.[[/note]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BadBoss: Machiavelli advises you to use both this trope and BenevolentBoss. You should be harsh enough to keep your subordinates in order and fear, but you also must be benevolent enough to them that they will be loyal to you. In short, Machiavelli advices you to be a ''pragmatic'' boss.

to:

* BadBoss: Machiavelli advises you to use both this trope and BenevolentBoss. You should be harsh enough to keep your subordinates in order and fear, but you also must be benevolent enough to them that they will be loyal to you. In short, Machiavelli advices advises you to be a ''pragmatic'' boss.



* BreadAndCircuses: Helps, but not a requisite.

to:

* BreadAndCircuses: Helps, This trope can help a ruler keep the masses on side, but it's not necessarily a requisite.



** The book does point out that you should only reserve such treatment for people who are actually guilty of something though. Heaping a FateWorseThanDeath on someone who wronged you will teach others not to be so foolish. Doing it to an innocent bystander will just foster hatred of your despotism. Cruelty to your enemies is a good way to terrify them, but random acts of cruelty is right out.

to:

** The book does point out that you should only reserve such treatment for people who are actually guilty of something though. Heaping a FateWorseThanDeath on someone who wronged you will teach others not to be so foolish. Doing it to an innocent bystander will just foster hatred of your despotism. Cruelty to your enemies is a good way to terrify them, but random acts of cruelty is are right out.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* KingpinInHisGym: Keeping your body physically fit is just as important as keeping your mind sharp and your army strong. Hunting is Machiavelli's personal recommendation of physical activity, because it only trains the senses, but you will also gain an understanding of how the terrain around you works which is especially useful when fighting a war on your turf.

to:

* KingpinInHisGym: Keeping your body physically fit is just as important as keeping your mind sharp and your army strong. Hunting is Machiavelli's personal recommendation of physical activity, because it not only trains the senses, but you will also gain an understanding of how the terrain around you works which is especially useful when fighting a war on your turf.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Written by Italian statesman Creator/NiccoloMachiavelli in 1513, ''The Prince'' (''Il Principe'') is the single most famous political treatise and the first entirely secular work of UsefulNotes/TheRenaissance. At the time it was first published, ''The Prince'' was seen as extremely scandalous for its endorsement of ruthlessness and amorality. Nevertheless, it quickly became popular with politicians and remains highly influential in Western politics today. If there's any MagnificentBastard in ''anything'' set after the Renaissance, it's very probable he's taken cues from this book.[[note]]Although they aren't quite as likely to actually have an in depth knowledge of the book as much as a pop-culture impression. However, it should noted that many fascists during the 19th and 20th centuries were mostly inspired by this work, as many fascist dictators such as Hitler and Mussolini often kept a copy of this work, the latter even wrote a thesis relating to this work.[[/note]]

to:

Written by Italian statesman Creator/NiccoloMachiavelli in 1513, ''The Prince'' (''Il Principe'') is the single most famous political treatise and the first entirely secular work of UsefulNotes/TheRenaissance. At the time it was first published, ''The Prince'' was seen as extremely scandalous for its endorsement of ruthlessness and amorality. Nevertheless, it quickly became popular with politicians and remains highly influential in Western politics today. If there's any MagnificentBastard in ''anything'' set after the Renaissance, it's very probable he's taken cues from this book.[[note]]Although they aren't quite as likely to actually have an in depth knowledge of the book as much as a pop-culture impression. However, it should noted that many fascists during the 19th and 20th centuries were mostly inspired by this work, as many fascist dictators such as Hitler and Mussolini often kept a copy of this work, the latter even wrote a thesis relating to this work.[[/note]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[PopculturalOsmosis Most people]] are familiar with Machiavelli as the man who said, "[[BeamMeUpScotty it is better to]] [[PopCulturalOsmosis be feared than loved]]". Over the years Machiavelli's name has become associated with [[DidYouActuallyBelieve dishonesty]], [[ChronicBackStabbingDisorder deceit]], and [[TheUnfettered ruthlessness]], so much that they even made his name an adjective most often used for unsavoury characters. However, Machiavelli repeats that while it is better for one to inspire fear, one should ''also'' try to inspire love, and must also remember not to [[ZeroPercentApprovalRating inspire hatred]]. A very common mistake people make is to conflate, "Be pragmatic," with, "Be an asshole." Everything a leader says and does need not automatically be a duplicitous front. A leader is perfectly free to have ideals, and be kind, generous, and just with their subjects. The main point is that if achieving one's goals means the leader ''must'' commit unsavoury acts, then they must do it. Going down in flames with your ideals intact is a fine and noble thing to do, and some may say you have a moral obligation to do that, but that is ''not'' what this book is about. ''The Prince'' should be regarded as a guidebook to maintaining power for the good of the prince and [[WellIntentionedExtremist ultimately the state]], ''not'' how to [[KickTheDog kick puppies left and right.]]

to:

[[PopculturalOsmosis Most people]] are familiar with Machiavelli as the man who said, "[[BeamMeUpScotty it is better to]] [[PopCulturalOsmosis be feared than loved]]". Over the years Machiavelli's name has become associated with [[DidYouActuallyBelieve dishonesty]], [[ChronicBackStabbingDisorder deceit]], and [[TheUnfettered ruthlessness]], so much that they even made his name an adjective most often used for unsavoury characters. However, Machiavelli repeats that while it is better for one to inspire fear, one should ''also'' try to inspire love, and must also remember not to [[ZeroPercentApprovalRating inspire hatred]]. A very common mistake people make is to conflate, "Be pragmatic," with, "Be an asshole." Everything a leader says and does need not automatically be a duplicitous front. A leader is perfectly free to have ideals, and be kind, generous, and just with their subjects. The main point is that if achieving one's goals means the leader ''must'' commit unsavoury acts, then they must do it. Going down in flames with your ideals intact is a fine and noble thing to do, and do - some may say you have it is a moral obligation to do that, - but that is ''not'' what the point of this book is about.book. ''The Prince'' should be regarded as a guidebook to maintaining power for the good of the prince and [[WellIntentionedExtremist ultimately the state]], ''not'' how to [[KickTheDog kick puppies left and right.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


--> "Hence it comes that all armed prophets have been victorious, and all unarmed prophets have been destroyed. For, besides the things that have been said, the nature of peoples is variable; and it is easy to persuade them of something, but difficult to keep them in that persuasion. And thus things must be ordered in such a mode that when the no longer believe, one can make them believe by force."

to:

--> "Hence it comes that all armed prophets have been victorious, and all unarmed prophets have been destroyed. For, besides the things that have been said, the nature of peoples is variable; and it is easy to persuade them of something, but difficult to keep them in that persuasion. And thus things must be ordered in such a mode that when the they no longer believe, one can make them believe by force."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[PopculturalOsmosis Most people]] are familiar with Machiavelli as the man who said, "[[BeamMeUpScotty it is better to]] [[PopCulturalOsmosis be feared than loved]]". Over the years Machiavelli's name has become associated with [[DidYouActuallyBelieve dishonesty]], [[ChronicBackStabbingDisorder deceit]], and [[TheUnfettered ruthlessness]], so much that they even made his name an adjective most often used for unsavoury characters. However, Machiavelli repeats that while it is better for one to inspire fear, one should ''also'' try to inspire love, and must also remember not to [[ZeroPercentApprovalRating inspire hatred]]. A very common mistake people make is to conflate, "Be pragmatic," with, "Be an asshole." Everything a leader says and does need not automatically be a duplicitous front. A leader is perfectly free to have ideals, and be kind, generous, and just with their subjects. The main point is that if achieving one's goals means the leader ''must'' commit unsavoury acts, then they must do it. Going down in flames with your ideals intact is a fine and noble thing to do, and some may say you have a moral obligation to do that, but that is ''not'' the point of this book. ''The Prince'' should be regarded as a guidebook to maintaining power for the good of the prince and [[WellIntentionedExtremist ultimately the state]], ''not'' how to [[KickTheDog kick puppies left and right.]]

to:

[[PopculturalOsmosis Most people]] are familiar with Machiavelli as the man who said, "[[BeamMeUpScotty it is better to]] [[PopCulturalOsmosis be feared than loved]]". Over the years Machiavelli's name has become associated with [[DidYouActuallyBelieve dishonesty]], [[ChronicBackStabbingDisorder deceit]], and [[TheUnfettered ruthlessness]], so much that they even made his name an adjective most often used for unsavoury characters. However, Machiavelli repeats that while it is better for one to inspire fear, one should ''also'' try to inspire love, and must also remember not to [[ZeroPercentApprovalRating inspire hatred]]. A very common mistake people make is to conflate, "Be pragmatic," with, "Be an asshole." Everything a leader says and does need not automatically be a duplicitous front. A leader is perfectly free to have ideals, and be kind, generous, and just with their subjects. The main point is that if achieving one's goals means the leader ''must'' commit unsavoury acts, then they must do it. Going down in flames with your ideals intact is a fine and noble thing to do, and some may say you have a moral obligation to do that, but that is ''not'' the point of what this book.book is about. ''The Prince'' should be regarded as a guidebook to maintaining power for the good of the prince and [[WellIntentionedExtremist ultimately the state]], ''not'' how to [[KickTheDog kick puppies left and right.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[PopculturalOsmosis Most people]] are familiar with Machiavelli as the man who said, "[[BeamMeUpScotty it is better to]] [[PopCulturalOsmosis be feared than loved]]". Over the years Machiavelli's name has become associated with [[DidYouActuallyBelieve dishonesty]], [[ChronicBackStabbingDisorder deceit]], and [[TheUnfettered ruthlessness]], so much that they even made his name an adjective most often used for unsavoury characters. However, Machiavelli repeats that while it is better for one to inspire fear, one should ''also'' try to inspire love, and must also remember not to [[ZeroPercentApprovalRating inspire hatred]]. It is very common to mistakenly conflate, "Be pragmatic," with, "Be an asshole." Everything a leader says and does need not automatically be a duplicitous front. A leader is perfectly free to have ideals, and be kind, generous, and just with their subjects. The main point is that if achieving one's goals means the leader ''must'' commit unsavoury acts, then they must do it. Going down in flames with your ideals intact is a fine and noble thing to do, and some may say you have a moral obligation to do that, but that is ''not'' the point of this book. ''The Prince'' should be regarded as a guidebook to maintaining power for the good of the prince and [[WellIntentionedExtremist ultimately the state]], ''not'' how to [[KickTheDog kick puppies left and right.]]

to:

[[PopculturalOsmosis Most people]] are familiar with Machiavelli as the man who said, "[[BeamMeUpScotty it is better to]] [[PopCulturalOsmosis be feared than loved]]". Over the years Machiavelli's name has become associated with [[DidYouActuallyBelieve dishonesty]], [[ChronicBackStabbingDisorder deceit]], and [[TheUnfettered ruthlessness]], so much that they even made his name an adjective most often used for unsavoury characters. However, Machiavelli repeats that while it is better for one to inspire fear, one should ''also'' try to inspire love, and must also remember not to [[ZeroPercentApprovalRating inspire hatred]]. It is A very common mistake people make is to mistakenly conflate, "Be pragmatic," with, "Be an asshole." Everything a leader says and does need not automatically be a duplicitous front. A leader is perfectly free to have ideals, and be kind, generous, and just with their subjects. The main point is that if achieving one's goals means the leader ''must'' commit unsavoury acts, then they must do it. Going down in flames with your ideals intact is a fine and noble thing to do, and some may say you have a moral obligation to do that, but that is ''not'' the point of this book. ''The Prince'' should be regarded as a guidebook to maintaining power for the good of the prince and [[WellIntentionedExtremist ultimately the state]], ''not'' how to [[KickTheDog kick puppies left and right.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[PopculturalOsmosis Most people]] are familiar with Machiavelli as the man who said, "[[BeamMeUpScotty it is better to]] [[PopCulturalOsmosis be feared than loved]]". Over the years Machiavelli's name has become associated with [[DidYouActuallyBelieve dishonesty]], [[ChronicBackStabbingDisorder deceit]], and [[TheUnfettered ruthlessness]], so much that they even made his name an adjective most often used for unsavoury characters. However, Machiavelli repeats that while it is better for one to inspire fear, one should ''also'' try to inspire love'', and must also remember not to [[ZeroPercentApprovalRating inspire hatred]]. It is very common to mistakenly conflate, "Be pragmatic," with, "Be an asshole." Everything a leader says and does need not automatically be a duplicitous front. A leader is perfectly free to have ideals, and be kind, generous, and just with their subjects. The main point is that if achieving one's goals means the leader ''must'' commit unsavoury acts, then they must do it. Going down in flames with your ideals intact is a fine and noble thing to do, and some may say you have a moral obligation to do that, but that is ''not'' the point of this book. ''The Prince'' should be regarded as a guidebook to maintaining power for the good of the prince and [[WellIntentionedExtremist ultimately the state]], ''not'' how to [[KickTheDog kick puppies left and right.]]

to:

[[PopculturalOsmosis Most people]] are familiar with Machiavelli as the man who said, "[[BeamMeUpScotty it is better to]] [[PopCulturalOsmosis be feared than loved]]". Over the years Machiavelli's name has become associated with [[DidYouActuallyBelieve dishonesty]], [[ChronicBackStabbingDisorder deceit]], and [[TheUnfettered ruthlessness]], so much that they even made his name an adjective most often used for unsavoury characters. However, Machiavelli repeats that while it is better for one to inspire fear, one should ''also'' try to inspire love'', love, and must also remember not to [[ZeroPercentApprovalRating inspire hatred]]. It is very common to mistakenly conflate, "Be pragmatic," with, "Be an asshole." Everything a leader says and does need not automatically be a duplicitous front. A leader is perfectly free to have ideals, and be kind, generous, and just with their subjects. The main point is that if achieving one's goals means the leader ''must'' commit unsavoury acts, then they must do it. Going down in flames with your ideals intact is a fine and noble thing to do, and some may say you have a moral obligation to do that, but that is ''not'' the point of this book. ''The Prince'' should be regarded as a guidebook to maintaining power for the good of the prince and [[WellIntentionedExtremist ultimately the state]], ''not'' how to [[KickTheDog kick puppies left and right.]]

Top