Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Literature / TheOnesWhoWalkAwayFromOmelas

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* MarySuetopia: {{Invoked|Trope}}. The LemonyNarrator constantly mentions how perfect the town is, but doesn't think the non-ironic, non-corny perfection is coming across to the reader, and so urges the reader to imagine his/her own version of a perfect place, rife with whatever he/she personally thinks is good and devoid of whatever he/she deems bad.

to:

* MarySuetopia: {{Invoked|Trope}}. The LemonyNarrator constantly mentions how perfect the town is, but doesn't think the non-ironic, non-corny perfection is coming across to the reader, and so urges the reader to imagine his/her their own version of a perfect place, rife with whatever he/she they personally thinks is good and devoid of whatever he/she deems they deem bad.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* SadisticChoice: At the core of the story. Every citizen of Omelas, once they're old enough to comprehend the full extent of the city's dark secret and what it entails, will have the truth revealed to them and will then be offered the choice to stay in Omelas, though now with the full knowledge of the terrible price which is being paid for their own happiness, or, should they deem this truth unacceptable, leave Omelas and never return. Notably, a [[TakeAThirdOption possible third option]]- to [[LaResistance rebel]] against Omelas and try to [[spoiler:rescue the child]]- is never given or addressed.

to:

* SadisticChoice: At the core of the story. Every citizen of Omelas, once they're old enough to comprehend the full extent of the city's dark secret and what it entails, will have the truth revealed to them and will then be offered the choice to stay in Omelas, though now with the full knowledge of the terrible price which is being paid for their own happiness, or, should they deem this truth unacceptable, leave Omelas and never return. Notably, a [[TakeAThirdOption possible third option]]- to option]]-to [[LaResistance rebel]] against Omelas and try to [[spoiler:rescue the child]]- is child]]-is never given or addressed.



* YouBastard: The Narrator subtly takes this attitude towards the audience, who due to reading to much dystopian literature and utopian deconstructions to accept the idea that a society may truly be near-perfect [[spoiler: throws out the tortured child]] just because the readers would demand such a catch when it was unnecessary in the first place. Now the utopia has a caveat and [[spoiler: a child has to suffer]] for the sake of the audience's curiosity.

to:

* YouBastard: The Narrator subtly takes this attitude towards the audience, who due to reading to so much dystopian literature and utopian deconstructions to accept the idea that a society may truly be near-perfect [[spoiler: throws out the tortured child]] just because the readers would demand such a catch when it was unnecessary in the first place. Now the utopia has a caveat and [[spoiler: a child has to suffer]] for the sake of the audience's curiosity.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Cross Wicked.

Added DiffLines:

* FalseUtopia: Omelas is a beautiful city where everyone is happy [[spoiler:except for one child whose suffering is somehow linked to Omelas' prosperity]]. And everyone in Omelas is made aware of this at some point. The title refers to the people who believe their "utopia" isn't worth it and abandon it for parts unknown.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* MetaTwist: To the {{Dystopian}} genre as a whole: the LemonyNarrator adds the twist [[spoiler:of the abused child]] strictly because [[GenreSavvy she knows that the people she's addressing will never believe that Omelas can be a utopia "just because"]] and will keep expecting a catch, because the sci-fi literature of the time was plagued with dystopias. So not only does [[UnreliableNarrator the catch may not exist at all]], [[{{Trolling}} she makes clear that she tossed it in there just to make the audience squirm]]. Hey, BeCarefulWhatYouWishFor, YouBastard!

to:

* MetaTwist: To the {{Dystopian}} genre as a whole: the LemonyNarrator adds the twist [[spoiler:of the abused child]] strictly because [[GenreSavvy she knows that the people she's addressing will never believe that Omelas can be a utopia "just because"]] and will keep expecting a catch, because the sci-fi literature of the time was plagued with dystopias. So not only does [[UnreliableNarrator the catch may possibly not exist at all]], [[{{Trolling}} she makes clear that she tossed it in there just to make the audience squirm]]. Hey, BeCarefulWhatYouWishFor, YouBastard!
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* MetaTwist: To the {{Dystopian}} genre as a whole: the LemonyNarrator adds the twist [[spoiler:of the abused child]] strictly because [[GenreSavvy he knows that the people he's addressing will never believe that Omelas can be a utopia "just because"]] and will keep expecting a catch, because the sci-fi literature of the time was plagued with dystopias. So not only does [[UnreliableNarrator the catch may not exist at all]], [[{{Trolling}} she makes clear that he tossed it in there just to make the audience squirm]]. Hey, BeCarefulWhatYouWishFor, YouBastard!

to:

* MetaTwist: To the {{Dystopian}} genre as a whole: the LemonyNarrator adds the twist [[spoiler:of the abused child]] strictly because [[GenreSavvy he she knows that the people he's she's addressing will never believe that Omelas can be a utopia "just because"]] and will keep expecting a catch, because the sci-fi literature of the time was plagued with dystopias. So not only does [[UnreliableNarrator the catch may not exist at all]], [[{{Trolling}} she makes clear that he she tossed it in there just to make the audience squirm]]. Hey, BeCarefulWhatYouWishFor, YouBastard!



* {{Utopia}}: Omelas is this. Subverted in that some of its inhabitants decide, once they know its secret, that it isn't worth it, and played with in the fact that the narrator essentially drops the bomb about the secret and then badgers the audience about having forced him to make such a horrible thing up for the sake of making his description of Omelas "realistic".

to:

* {{Utopia}}: Omelas is this. Subverted in that some of its inhabitants decide, once they know its secret, that it isn't worth it, and played with in the fact that the narrator essentially drops the bomb about the secret and then badgers the audience about having forced him her to make such a horrible thing up for the sake of making his her description of Omelas "realistic".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* MeaningfulName: Accidental variant. Le Guin said that she just got the name when she saw "Salem, OR" (that's Oregon) on a road sign and spelled it backwards on a whim, but the name "Salem" is meaningful on its own -- it has the same root word as the Hebrew word ''Shalom,'' or "peace," [[SalemIsWitchCountry and of course it is also the name of the Massachusetts town which held infamous witch trials]].

to:

* MeaningfulName: Accidental variant. Le Guin said that she just got the name when she saw "Salem, OR" (that's Oregon) on a road sign and spelled it backwards on a whim, but the name "Salem" is meaningful on its own -- it has the same root word as the Hebrew word ''Shalom,'' or "peace," and may be linked to "Jerusalem", a city which among other things is associated with [[{{Heaven}} the new creation]] described at the end of Revelation. [[SalemIsWitchCountry and And of course it Salem is also the name of the Massachusetts town which held infamous witch trials]].



* MetaTwist: To the {{Dystopian}} genre as a whole: the LemonyNarrator adds the twist [[spoiler:of the abused child]] strictly because [[GenreSavvy he knows that the people he's addressing will never believe that Omelas can be a utopia "just because"]] and will keep expecting a catch, because the sci-fi literature of the time was plagued with dystopias. So not only does [[UnreliableNarrator the catch may not exist at all]], [[{{Trolling}} he makes clear that he tossed it in there just to make the audience squirm]]. Hey, BeCarefulWhatYouWishFor, YouBastard!

to:

* MetaTwist: To the {{Dystopian}} genre as a whole: the LemonyNarrator adds the twist [[spoiler:of the abused child]] strictly because [[GenreSavvy he knows that the people he's addressing will never believe that Omelas can be a utopia "just because"]] and will keep expecting a catch, because the sci-fi literature of the time was plagued with dystopias. So not only does [[UnreliableNarrator the catch may not exist at all]], [[{{Trolling}} he she makes clear that he tossed it in there just to make the audience squirm]]. Hey, BeCarefulWhatYouWishFor, YouBastard!

Added: 442

Changed: 112

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* {{Arcadia}}: Averted; the narrator specifically shoots down the idea that Omelas is an agrarian paradise and notes their urban nature and advanced technology.



* DrugsAreGood: The narrator initially says that DrugsAreBad, but then reconsiders, finding this puritanical, and says that ''drooz'' is a psychoactive drug that makes people happy without downsides, and beer is fine too. Notably, this helps prove that Omelas is not "goody-goody".



* FreeLoveFuture: The narrator suggests that, if the reader thinks this would be ideal, then Omelas has this kind of society.

to:

* FreeLoveFuture: The narrator suggests that, if the reader thinks this would be ideal, then Omelas has this kind of society. Along with the ''drooz'', this shows that Omelas's happiness is not accomplished by restricting pleasant vices.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* YouBastard: The Narrator subtly takes this attitude towards the audience, who due to reading to much dystopian literature and utopian deconstructions to accept the idea that a society may truly be near-perfect [[spoiler: throws out the tortured child]] just because the readers would demand such a catch when it was unnecessary in the first place. Now the utopia has a caveat and [[spoiler: a child has to suffer]] for the sake of the audience's curiosity.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* MetaTwist: To the {{Dystopian}} genre as a whole: the LemonyNarrator adds the twist [[spoiler:of the abused child]] strictly because [[GenreSavvy he knows that the people he's addressing will never believe that Omelas can be a utopia "just because"]] and will keep expecting a catch, because the sci-fi literature of the time was plagued with dystopias. So not only does [[UnreliableNarrator the catch may not exist at all]], [[{{Trolling}} he makes clear that he tossed it in there just to make the audience squirm]]. Hey, BeCarefulWhatYouWishFor, YouBastard!

Added: 100

Removed: 4

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Added image.


[[quoteright:350:https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/ones_who_walk_away_from_omelas.png]]



----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* InherentInTheSystem: In order for Omelas to function, [[spoiler:one child must be kept in absolute misery]].

to:

* InherentInTheSystem: In order for Omelas to function, [[spoiler:one child must be kept in absolute misery]]. [[UnreliableNarrator Maybe.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* UtopiaJustifiesTheMeans: We learn that [[spoiler:a young child is severely mistreated in order for everyone else to be happy]]. [[SubvertedTrope However]], the narration never quite makes clear if the [[spoiler:suffering child]] is ''really'' necessary or not, or even if it actually ''exists'', merely suggesting that ''[[YouBastard we the readers]]'' would never believe the story if not for that element. Which also makes it a bit of a [[TakeThatAudience Take That to the audience]] for them being (it’s assumed) unwilling to accept that Utopia could actually exist ''without'' such a price.

to:

* UtopiaJustifiesTheMeans: We learn that [[spoiler:a young child is severely mistreated in order for everyone else to be happy]]. [[SubvertedTrope However]], the narration never quite makes clear if the [[spoiler:suffering child]] is ''really'' necessary or not, or even if it actually ''exists'', exists in the first place, merely suggesting that ''[[YouBastard we the readers]]'' would never believe the story if not for that element. Which also makes it a bit of a [[TakeThatAudience Take That to the audience]] for them being (it’s assumed) unwilling to accept that Utopia could actually exist ''without'' such a price.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* UtopiaJustifiesTheMeans: We learn that [[spoiler:a young child is severely mistreated in order for everyone else to be happy]]. [[SubvertedTrope However]], the narration never quite makes clear if the [[spoiler:suffering child]] is ''really'' necessary or not, merely suggesting that ''[[YouBastard we the readers]]'' would never believe the story if not for that element. Which also makes it a bit of a [[TakeThatAudience Take That to the audience]] for them being (it’s assumed) unwilling to accept that Utopia could actually exist ''without'' such a price.

to:

* UtopiaJustifiesTheMeans: We learn that [[spoiler:a young child is severely mistreated in order for everyone else to be happy]]. [[SubvertedTrope However]], the narration never quite makes clear if the [[spoiler:suffering child]] is ''really'' necessary or not, or even if it actually ''exists'', merely suggesting that ''[[YouBastard we the readers]]'' would never believe the story if not for that element. Which also makes it a bit of a [[TakeThatAudience Take That to the audience]] for them being (it’s assumed) unwilling to accept that Utopia could actually exist ''without'' such a price.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* UnreliableNarrator: See above. One interpretation is that the [[spoiler: child being tortured]] isn't actually there at all and was just made up by the narrator to make the utopia seem more "realistic", the logic being that a utopia with no flaws at all wouldn't be believable.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* SadisticChoice: At the core of the story. Every citizen of Omelas, once they're old enough to comprehend the full extent of the city's dark secret and what it entails, will have the truth revealed to them and will then be offered the choice to stay in Omelas, though now with the full knowledge of the terrible price which is being paid for their own happiness, or, should they deem this truth unacceptable, leave Omelas and never return.

to:

* SadisticChoice: At the core of the story. Every citizen of Omelas, once they're old enough to comprehend the full extent of the city's dark secret and what it entails, will have the truth revealed to them and will then be offered the choice to stay in Omelas, though now with the full knowledge of the terrible price which is being paid for their own happiness, or, should they deem this truth unacceptable, leave Omelas and never return. Notably, a [[TakeAThirdOption possible third option]]- to [[LaResistance rebel]] against Omelas and try to [[spoiler:rescue the child]]- is never given or addressed.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* {{Deconstruction}}: More like a deconstruction of utopia deconstructions. As readers who are used to reading dystopian literature can't possibly accept a utopia without some sort of catch, the LemonyNarrator just throws out [[spoiler:the tortured child]] to satisfy the reader's inner curiosity.

to:

* {{Deconstruction}}: More like a deconstruction of Of utopia deconstructions.deconstructions themselves. As readers who are used to reading dystopian literature can't possibly accept a utopia without some sort of catch, the LemonyNarrator just throws out [[spoiler:the tortured child]] to satisfy the reader's inner curiosity.



* ItIsDehumanizing: An IntendedAudienceReaction. The narrator refers to the child as "it" because "it could be a boy or girl" at any time in the history of Omelas, but the effect of this trope persists nonetheless: readers understand that the child is seen more as a thing than as a person.

to:

* ItIsDehumanizing: An IntendedAudienceReaction. The narrator refers to the child [[spoiler:the child]] as "it" because "it could be a boy or girl" at any time in the history of Omelas, but the effect of this trope persists nonetheless: readers understand that the child is seen more as a thing than as a person.



** This is played with later when the narrator, obviously [[GenreSavvy not expecting the reader to believe]] that such a place would exist ''anywhere'' [[TownWithADarkSecret without some kind of price being paid]], eventually [[spoiler:just drops the description of the child and what is done to it for the sake of making ''the rest'' of the town a Mary Suetopia, and essentially asks the reader: "[[YouBastard There you go, a horrible flaw in the system! Are you happy now?!]]"]].
* MeaningfulName: Averted. Le Guin said that she just got the name when she saw "Salem, OR" (that's Oregon) on a road sign and spelled it backwards on a whim. But the name "Salem" is meaningful on its own -- it has the same root word as the Hebrew word ''Shalom,'' or "peace," and of course it is also the name of the Massachusetts town which held infamous witch trials.

to:

** This is played with later when the narrator, obviously [[GenreSavvy not expecting the reader to believe]] that such a place would exist ''anywhere'' [[TownWithADarkSecret without some kind of price being paid]], eventually [[spoiler:just just drops the description of the child [[spoiler:the child]] and what is done to it for the sake of making ''the rest'' of the town a Mary Suetopia, and essentially asks the reader: "[[YouBastard There you go, a horrible flaw in the system! Are you happy now?!]]"]].
now?!]]"
* MeaningfulName: Averted. Accidental variant. Le Guin said that she just got the name when she saw "Salem, OR" (that's Oregon) on a road sign and spelled it backwards on a whim. But whim, but the name "Salem" is meaningful on its own -- it has the same root word as the Hebrew word ''Shalom,'' or "peace," [[SalemIsWitchCountry and of course it is also the name of the Massachusetts town which held infamous witch trials.trials]].



* TheNeedsOfTheMany: The entire basis for the story is more-or-less an exploration of this trope.

to:

* TheNeedsOfTheMany: The entire basis for [[spoiler:the infusion of the story child who bears the misery of Omelas so no one else has to]] is more-or-less an exploration of this trope.



* PostModernism: The LemonyNarrator interacts with the reader a lot and there is no conventional story. Actually, this may be a case of "post-post modernism" as well since the story deconstructs the reader's desire to know what the catch of a utopia is (thereby revealing the society to be a dystopia) which has come about in post modern dystopian stories that critique the idea of a perfect society.
* PoweredByAForsakenChild: The good of Omelas relies [[spoiler: on, yes, the abject suffering of one child.]]

to:

* PostModernism: The LemonyNarrator interacts with the reader a lot and there is no conventional story. Actually, this may May be a case of "post-post modernism" as well well, since the story deconstructs the reader's desire to know what the catch of a utopia is (thereby revealing the society to be a dystopia) which has come about in post modern dystopian stories that critique the idea of a perfect society.
* PoweredByAForsakenChild: The good of Omelas relies [[spoiler: on, yes, the on [[spoiler:the abject suffering of one child.]]child]].



* TakeThatAudience: The LemonyNarrator makes it clear that they are aware the reader can't possibly accept a utopia without some sort of catch, so it brings up the [[spoiler:tortured child]] with an "are you happy now?" demeanor.

to:

* TakeThatAudience: The LemonyNarrator makes it clear that they are aware the reader can't possibly accept a utopia without some sort of catch, so it brings up the [[spoiler:tortured child]] with an [[YouBastard "are you happy now?" now?"]] demeanor.



* TownWithADarkSecret: Subverted, possibly. All citizens of Omelas learn the secret once they're old enough to understand it. The secret is only kept (briefly) from the reader. It's also implied the narrator just tossed the "dark secret" there [[{{Troll}} for the sake of giving the audience a dark secret]] -- otherwise they wouldn't accept Omelas' perfection at face value and would keep asking him where's the (up to that point non-existent) catch.
* {{Utopia}}: Omelas is this. Subverted in that some of its inhabitants decide, once they know its secret, that it isn't worth it and played with in the fact that the narrator essentially drops the bomb about the secret and then badgers the audience about having forced him to make such a horrible thing up for the sake of making his description of Omelas "realistic".
* UtopiaJustifiesTheMeans: We learn that [[spoiler:a young child is severely mistreated in order for everyone else to be happy]]. But this is arguably a partial [[SubvertedTrope subversion of the trope]]; the narration never quite makes clear if the [[spoiler:suffering child]] is ''really'' necessary or not, merely suggesting that ''we the readers'' would never believe the story if not for that element. Which also makes it a bit of a [[TakeThatAudience Take That to the audience]] for them being (it’s assumed) unwilling to accept that Utopia could actually exist ''without'' such a price.
* WalkingSpoiler: It's basically impossible to [[spoiler:discuss the major themes of the work without mentioning the forsaken child]].

to:

* TownWithADarkSecret: Subverted, possibly. All citizens of Omelas learn the secret once they're old enough to understand it. The secret is only kept (briefly) from the reader. It's also implied the narrator just tossed the "dark secret" there [[{{Troll}} for the sake of giving the audience a dark secret]] -- otherwise they wouldn't accept Omelas' perfection at face value and would keep asking him them where's the (up to that point non-existent) catch.
* {{Utopia}}: Omelas is this. Subverted in that some of its inhabitants decide, once they know its secret, that it isn't worth it it, and played with in the fact that the narrator essentially drops the bomb about the secret and then badgers the audience about having forced him to make such a horrible thing up for the sake of making his description of Omelas "realistic".
* UtopiaJustifiesTheMeans: We learn that [[spoiler:a young child is severely mistreated in order for everyone else to be happy]]. But this is arguably a partial [[SubvertedTrope subversion of the trope]]; However]], the narration never quite makes clear if the [[spoiler:suffering child]] is ''really'' necessary or not, merely suggesting that ''we ''[[YouBastard we the readers'' readers]]'' would never believe the story if not for that element. Which also makes it a bit of a [[TakeThatAudience Take That to the audience]] for them being (it’s assumed) unwilling to accept that Utopia could actually exist ''without'' such a price.
* WalkingSpoiler: It's basically impossible to [[spoiler:discuss discuss the major themes of the work without mentioning the forsaken [[spoiler:forsaken child]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* SdrawkcabName: WordOfGod says that Omelas was named by spelling Salem, O[regon] backwards.

to:

* SdrawkcabName: WordOfGod says Le Guin said that Omelas was named by spelling Salem, O[regon] backwards.



* UtopiaJustifiesTheMeans: We learn that [[spoiler:a young child is severely mistreated in order for everyone else to be happy]]. But this is arguably a partial [[SubvertedTrope subversion of the trope]]; the narration never quite makes clear if the [[spoiler:suffering child]] is ''really'' necessary or not, merely suggesting that ''we the readers'' would never believe the story if not for that element. Which also makes it a bit of a [[TakeThatAudience Take That to the audience]] for them being (it’s assumed) unwilling to accept that Utopia could actually exist ''without'' a price.

to:

* UtopiaJustifiesTheMeans: We learn that [[spoiler:a young child is severely mistreated in order for everyone else to be happy]]. But this is arguably a partial [[SubvertedTrope subversion of the trope]]; the narration never quite makes clear if the [[spoiler:suffering child]] is ''really'' necessary or not, merely suggesting that ''we the readers'' would never believe the story if not for that element. Which also makes it a bit of a [[TakeThatAudience Take That to the audience]] for them being (it’s assumed) unwilling to accept that Utopia could actually exist ''without'' such a price.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* SadisticChoice: At the core of the story. Every citizen of Omelas, once they old enough to comprehend the full extend of the city's dark secret and what it entails, will have the truth revealed to them and are then offered the choice to stay in Omelas, though now with the full knowledge of the terrible price which is being paid for their own happiness, or, should they deem this truth unacceptable, leave Omelas and never return.

to:

* SadisticChoice: At the core of the story. Every citizen of Omelas, once they they're old enough to comprehend the full extend extent of the city's dark secret and what it entails, will have the truth revealed to them and are will then be offered the choice to stay in Omelas, though now with the full knowledge of the terrible price which is being paid for their own happiness, or, should they deem this truth unacceptable, leave Omelas and never return.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** This is played with later when the narrator, obviously [[GenreSavvy not expecting the reader to believe]] that such a place would exist ''anywhere'' [[TownWithADarkSecret without some kind of price being paid]], eventually [[spoiler:just drops the description of the child and what is done to it for the sake of making ''the rest'' of the town a Mary Suetopia, and essentially asks the reader: "[[ArmorPiercingQuestion There you go, a horrible flaw in the system! Are you happy now?!]]"]].

to:

** This is played with later when the narrator, obviously [[GenreSavvy not expecting the reader to believe]] that such a place would exist ''anywhere'' [[TownWithADarkSecret without some kind of price being paid]], eventually [[spoiler:just drops the description of the child and what is done to it for the sake of making ''the rest'' of the town a Mary Suetopia, and essentially asks the reader: "[[ArmorPiercingQuestion "[[YouBastard There you go, a horrible flaw in the system! Are you happy now?!]]"]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* {{Deconstruction}}: More like a deconstruction of utopia deconstructions. As readers who are used to reading dystopian literature can't possibly accept a utopia with some sort of catch, the LemonyNarrator just throws out [[spoiler:the tortured child]] to satisfy the reader's inner curiosity.

to:

* {{Deconstruction}}: More like a deconstruction of utopia deconstructions. As readers who are used to reading dystopian literature can't possibly accept a utopia with without some sort of catch, the LemonyNarrator just throws out [[spoiler:the tortured child]] to satisfy the reader's inner curiosity.



* TownWithADarkSecret: Subverted, possibly. All citizens of Omelas learn the secret once they're old enough to understand it. The secret is only kept (briefly) from the reader.

to:

* TownWithADarkSecret: Subverted, possibly. All citizens of Omelas learn the secret once they're old enough to understand it. The secret is only kept (briefly) from the reader. It's also implied the narrator just tossed the "dark secret" there [[{{Troll}} for the sake of giving the audience a dark secret]] -- otherwise they wouldn't accept Omelas' perfection at face value and would keep asking him where's the (up to that point non-existent) catch.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* InherentInTheSystem: In order for Omelas to run properly, [[spoiler:one child must be kept in absolute misery]].

to:

* InherentInTheSystem: In order for Omelas to run properly, function, [[spoiler:one child must be kept in absolute misery]].



** It's played with later when the Narrator, obviously [[GenreSavvy not expecting the reader to believe]] that such a place would exist ''anywhere'' [[TownWithADarkSecret without some kind of price being paid]], eventually [[spoiler:just drops the description of the child and what is done to it for the sake of making ''the rest'' of the town a Mary Suetopia and essentially asks the reader: "[[ArmorPiercingQuestion There you go, a horrible flaw in the system! Are you happy now?!]]"]].
* MeaningfulName: Averted. Le Guin says that she just got the name by seeing "Salem, OR" (that's Oregon) on a road sign and spelled it backwards on a whim. But the name "Salem" is meaningful on its own -- it has the same root word as the Hebrew word ''Shalom,'' or "peace," and of course it is also the name of the Massachusetts town which held infamous witch trials.

to:

** It's This is played with later when the Narrator, narrator, obviously [[GenreSavvy not expecting the reader to believe]] that such a place would exist ''anywhere'' [[TownWithADarkSecret without some kind of price being paid]], eventually [[spoiler:just drops the description of the child and what is done to it for the sake of making ''the rest'' of the town a Mary Suetopia Suetopia, and essentially asks the reader: "[[ArmorPiercingQuestion There you go, a horrible flaw in the system! Are you happy now?!]]"]].
* MeaningfulName: Averted. Le Guin says said that she just got the name by seeing when she saw "Salem, OR" (that's Oregon) on a road sign and spelled it backwards on a whim. But the name "Salem" is meaningful on its own -- it has the same root word as the Hebrew word ''Shalom,'' or "peace," and of course it is also the name of the Massachusetts town which held infamous witch trials.



* UtopiaJustifiesTheMeans: We learn that [[spoiler:a young child is severely mistreated in order for everyone else to be happy]]. But this is arguably a partial [[SubvertedTrope subversion]]: the narration never quite makes clear if the [[spoiler:suffering child]] is ''really'' necessary or not, merely that ''we the readers'' would never believe the story if not for that element. Which also makes it a bit of a [[TakeThatAudience Take That to the audience!]] for them being (it’s assumed) unwilling to accept that Utopia could actually exist ''without'' a price.
* WalkingSpoiler: [[spoiler:It's basically impossible to discuss the major themes of the work without mentioning the forsaken child.]]
* WasItReallyWorthIt: Everyone in Omelas must face this question. [[spoiler:After seeing the suffering child, some people can't bear living in Omelas anymore and walk away.]]

to:

* UtopiaJustifiesTheMeans: We learn that [[spoiler:a young child is severely mistreated in order for everyone else to be happy]]. But this is arguably a partial [[SubvertedTrope subversion]]: subversion of the trope]]; the narration never quite makes clear if the [[spoiler:suffering child]] is ''really'' necessary or not, merely suggesting that ''we the readers'' would never believe the story if not for that element. Which also makes it a bit of a [[TakeThatAudience Take That to the audience!]] audience]] for them being (it’s assumed) unwilling to accept that Utopia could actually exist ''without'' a price.
* WalkingSpoiler: [[spoiler:It's It's basically impossible to discuss [[spoiler:discuss the major themes of the work without mentioning the forsaken child.]]
child]].
* WasItReallyWorthIt: Everyone in Omelas must face this question. [[spoiler:After seeing the suffering child, some people can't bear living in Omelas anymore any more and walk away.]]

Changed: 436

Removed: 400

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* UtopiaJustifiesTheMeans: We learn that [[spoiler:a young child is severely mistreated in order for everyone else to be happy]].
** Arguably a partial [[SubvertedTrope subversion]]: the narration never quite makes clear if the [[spoiler:suffering child]] is ''really'' necessary or not, merely that ''we the readers'' would never believe the story if not for that element. Which also makes it a bit of a [[TakeThatAudience Take That, Audience!]] for being unwilling to accept that Utopia could actually exist ''without'' a price.

to:

* UtopiaJustifiesTheMeans: We learn that [[spoiler:a young child is severely mistreated in order for everyone else to be happy]].
** Arguably
happy]]. But this is arguably a partial [[SubvertedTrope subversion]]: the narration never quite makes clear if the [[spoiler:suffering child]] is ''really'' necessary or not, merely that ''we the readers'' would never believe the story if not for that element. Which also makes it a bit of a [[TakeThatAudience Take That, Audience!]] That to the audience!]] for them being (it’s assumed) unwilling to accept that Utopia could actually exist ''without'' a price.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


:: :It's played with later when the Narrator, obviously [[GenreSavvy not expecting the reader to believe]] that such a place would exist ''anywhere'' [[TownWithADarkSecret without some kind of price being paid]], eventually [[spoiler:just drops the description of the child and what is done to it for the sake of making ''the rest'' of the town a Mary Suetopia and essentially asks the reader: "[[ArmorPiercingQuestion There you go, a horrible flaw in the system! Are you happy now?!]]"]].

to:

:: :It's ** It's played with later when the Narrator, obviously [[GenreSavvy not expecting the reader to believe]] that such a place would exist ''anywhere'' [[TownWithADarkSecret without some kind of price being paid]], eventually [[spoiler:just drops the description of the child and what is done to it for the sake of making ''the rest'' of the town a Mary Suetopia and essentially asks the reader: "[[ArmorPiercingQuestion There you go, a horrible flaw in the system! Are you happy now?!]]"]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* PoweredByAForsakenChild: The good of Omelas appears to rely on the abject suffering of one child.

to:

* PoweredByAForsakenChild: The good of Omelas appears to rely on relies [[spoiler: on, yes, the abject suffering of one child.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* SadisticChoice: At the core of the story. Every citizen of Omelas, once they old enough to comprehend the full extend of the city's dark secret and what it entails are offered the choice to stay in Omelas, with the full knowledge of the terrible price paid for their own happiness, or, should they deem this truth unacceptable, leave Omelas and never return.

to:

* SadisticChoice: At the core of the story. Every citizen of Omelas, once they old enough to comprehend the full extend of the city's dark secret and what it entails entails, will have the truth revealed to them and are then offered the choice to stay in Omelas, though now with the full knowledge of the terrible price which is being paid for their own happiness, or, should they deem this truth unacceptable, leave Omelas and never return.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* SadisticChoice: At the core of the story. Every citizen of Omelas, once they old enough to comprehend the full extend of the city's dark secret and what it entails are offered the choice to stay in Omelas, with the full knowledge of the terrible price paid for their own happiness, or, should they deem this truth unacceptable, leave Omelas and never return.

Added: 693

Changed: 1599

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


"[[http://web.archive.org/web/20070810183849/http://www.twinoaks.org/members-exmembers/exmembers/center/omelas.html The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas]]" is a {{Meta Fiction}} by {{Ursula K Le Guin}}, written in 1973.

to:

"[[http://web.archive.org/web/20070810183849/http://www.twinoaks.org/members-exmembers/exmembers/center/omelas.html The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas]]" is a {{Meta Fiction}} MetaFiction by {{Ursula K Le Guin}}, Creator/UrsulaKLeGuin, written in 1973.



* ArsonMurderAndJaywalking: Part of Omelas' description mentions it having things that haven't yet been invented, such as floating light sources, fuelless power, and a cure for the common cold.



* CrapsaccharineWorld: Downplayed. Omelas genuinely ''is'' a {{Utopia}}, but [[spoiler: one whose existence relies on a continually-sustained act of unspeakable barbarity towards an innocent.]]
* {{Deconstruction}}: More like a deconstruction of utopia deconstructions. As readers who are used to reading dystopian literature can't possibly accept a utopia with some sort of catch, the LemonyNarrator just throws out [[spoiler: the tortured child]] to satisfy the reader's inner curiosity.
* DefectorFromParadise: The story features the titular Ones. The Ones are people who choose to leave the perfect Utopian city of Omelas of their own will because [[spoiler: Omelas' prosperity is PoweredByAForsakenChild]].

to:

* CrapsaccharineWorld: Downplayed. Omelas genuinely ''is'' a {{Utopia}}, but [[spoiler: one [[spoiler:one whose existence relies on a continually-sustained act of unspeakable barbarity towards an innocent.]]
* {{Deconstruction}}: More like a deconstruction of utopia deconstructions. As readers who are used to reading dystopian literature can't possibly accept a utopia with some sort of catch, the LemonyNarrator just throws out [[spoiler: the [[spoiler:the tortured child]] to satisfy the reader's inner curiosity.
* DefectorFromParadise: The story features the titular Ones. The Ones are people who choose to leave the perfect Utopian city of Omelas of their own will because [[spoiler: Omelas' [[spoiler:Omelas' prosperity is PoweredByAForsakenChild]].



* {{Good Is Not Dumb}}: The narrator emphasizes that the happiness of the people of Omelas doesn't make them stupid or naive.
* {{Inherent In The System}}: In order for Omelas to run properly, [[spoiler:one child must be kept in absolute misery]].

to:

* {{Good Is Not Dumb}}: GoodIsNotDumb: The narrator emphasizes that the happiness of the people of Omelas doesn't make them stupid or naive.
* {{Inherent In The System}}: InherentInTheSystem: In order for Omelas to run properly, [[spoiler:one child must be kept in absolute misery]].



* MarySueTopia: PlayedWith: the LemonyNarrator constantly mentions how perfect the town is, but obviously [[GenreSavvy doesn't expects the reader to believe]] that such a place would exist ''anywhere'' [[TownWithADarkSecret without some kind of price being paid]], so eventually the narrator [[spoiler: just drops the description of the child and what is done to it for the sake of making ''the rest'' of the town a MarySueTopia and essentially asks the reader: "[[ArmorPiercingQuestion There you go, a horrible flaw in the system! Are you happy now?!]]"]].
* MeaningfulName: Averted. Le Guin says that she just got the name by seeing "Salem, OR" (that's Oregon) on a road sign and spelled it backwards on a whim. But the name "Salem" is meaningful on its own -- it has the same root word as the Hebrew word ''Shalom,'' or "peace," and of course it is the name of the town which held infamous witch trials.
* {{Meta Fiction}}: The narrator speaks directly to the reader, even insisting that they cannot properly describe Omelas in all its glory.

to:

* MarySueTopia: PlayedWith: the MarySuetopia: {{Invoked|Trope}}. The LemonyNarrator constantly mentions how perfect the town is, but doesn't think the non-ironic, non-corny perfection is coming across to the reader, and so urges the reader to imagine his/her own version of a perfect place, rife with whatever he/she personally thinks is good and devoid of whatever he/she deems bad.
-->But I wish I could describe it better. I wish I could convince you. Omelas sounds in my words like a city in a fairy tale, long ago and far away, once upon a time. Perhaps it would be best if you imagined it as your own fancy bids, assuming it will rise to the occasion, for certainly I cannot suit you all.
:: :It's played with later when the Narrator,
obviously [[GenreSavvy doesn't expects not expecting the reader to believe]] that such a place would exist ''anywhere'' [[TownWithADarkSecret without some kind of price being paid]], so eventually the narrator [[spoiler: just [[spoiler:just drops the description of the child and what is done to it for the sake of making ''the rest'' of the town a MarySueTopia Mary Suetopia and essentially asks the reader: "[[ArmorPiercingQuestion There you go, a horrible flaw in the system! Are you happy now?!]]"]].
* MeaningfulName: Averted. Le Guin says that she just got the name by seeing "Salem, OR" (that's Oregon) on a road sign and spelled it backwards on a whim. But the name "Salem" is meaningful on its own -- it has the same root word as the Hebrew word ''Shalom,'' or "peace," and of course it is also the name of the Massachusetts town which held infamous witch trials.
* {{Meta Fiction}}: MetaFiction: The narrator speaks directly to the reader, even insisting that they cannot properly describe Omelas in all its glory.



* TakeThatAudience: The LemonyNarrator makes it clear that they are aware the reader can't possibly accept a utopia without some sort of catch, so it brings up the [[spoiler: tortured child]] with an "are you happy now?" demeanor.

to:

* TakeThatAudience: The LemonyNarrator makes it clear that they are aware the reader can't possibly accept a utopia without some sort of catch, so it brings up the [[spoiler: tortured [[spoiler:tortured child]] with an "are you happy now?" demeanor.



* {{Utopia Justifies The Means}}: We learn that [[spoiler:a young child is severely mistreated in order for everyone else to be happy]].
** Arguably a partial [[SubvertedTrope subversion]]: the narration never quite makes clear if the [[spoiler: suffering child]] is ''really'' necessary or not, merely that ''we the readers'' would never believe the story if not for that element. Which also makes it a bit of a [[TakeThatAudience Take That, Audience!]] for being unwilling to accept that Utopia could actually exist ''without'' a price.

to:

* {{Utopia Justifies The Means}}: UtopiaJustifiesTheMeans: We learn that [[spoiler:a young child is severely mistreated in order for everyone else to be happy]].
** Arguably a partial [[SubvertedTrope subversion]]: the narration never quite makes clear if the [[spoiler: suffering [[spoiler:suffering child]] is ''really'' necessary or not, merely that ''we the readers'' would never believe the story if not for that element. Which also makes it a bit of a [[TakeThatAudience Take That, Audience!]] for being unwilling to accept that Utopia could actually exist ''without'' a price.



* {{Was It Really Worth It}}: Everyone in Omelas must face this question. [[spoiler: After seeing the suffering child, some people can't bear living in Omelas anymore and walk away.]]

to:

* {{Was It Really Worth It}}: WasItReallyWorthIt: Everyone in Omelas must face this question. [[spoiler: After [[spoiler:After seeing the suffering child, some people can't bear living in Omelas anymore and walk away.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* {{Utopia}}: Omelas is this. Subverted in that some of its inhabitants decide, once they know its secret, that it isn't worth it and played with in the fact that the narrator essentially drops the bomb about the secret and then badgers the audience into having forced him to make such a horrible thing for the sake of making his description of Omelas "realistic".

to:

* {{Utopia}}: Omelas is this. Subverted in that some of its inhabitants decide, once they know its secret, that it isn't worth it and played with in the fact that the narrator essentially drops the bomb about the secret and then badgers the audience into about having forced him to make such a horrible thing up for the sake of making his description of Omelas "realistic".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* {{Utopia}}: Omelas is this. Subverted in that some of its inhabitants decide, once they know its secret, that it isn't worth it.

to:

* {{Utopia}}: Omelas is this. Subverted in that some of its inhabitants decide, once they know its secret, that it isn't worth it.it and played with in the fact that the narrator essentially drops the bomb about the secret and then badgers the audience into having forced him to make such a horrible thing for the sake of making his description of Omelas "realistic".

Top