Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 22 (click to see context) from:
* PoorCommunicationKills: Not admitting to the lost necklace, or that the necklace was fake in the first place, resulted in Matilde and her husband working themselves ragged to replace a piece of costume jewelry with a real one.
to:
* PoorCommunicationKills: Not admitting to the lost necklace, or that the necklace was fake in the first place, resulted in Matilde and her husband working themselves ragged to replace a piece of costume jewelry with a real one. Even worse, Matilde's husband brought it up, only to fall on deaf ears. At the same time, had the friend ''told'' that the necklace was a cheap knockoff, things wouldn't have been become so dire.
Changed line(s) 24 (click to see context) from:
* ShaggyDogStory: This story's version of the trope is so strong, it nearly crosses over to ShootTheShaggyDog territory (if the reader wasn't laughing from the story's cruel irony). What saves it from that extreme is that the situation could have been ''very'' easily avoided, had Matilde not been so deathly prideful and she and her husband simply [[PoorCommunicationKills admitted]] that they lost the necklace in the first place. (Admittedly, it also could have been avoided if the friend had simply told her the necklace was an imitation right from the start!)
to:
* ShaggyDogStory: This story's version of the trope is so strong, it nearly crosses over to ShootTheShaggyDog territory (if the reader wasn't laughing from the story's cruel irony). What saves it from that extreme is that the situation could have been ''very'' easily avoided, had Matilde not been so deathly prideful and she and her husband simply [[PoorCommunicationKills admitted]] that they lost the necklace in the first place. (Admittedly, it also could have been avoided if the friend had simply told her ''told her'' the necklace was an imitation right from the start!)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 13 (click to see context) from:
* {{Foreshadowing}} : There's some hint that the necklace isn't as valuable as Mathilde -- obsessed with appearances as she is -- thinks it to be, judging by how casually her friend lets her borrow it, and how the clasp easily broke.
to:
* {{Foreshadowing}} : {{Foreshadowing}}: There's some hint that the necklace isn't as valuable as Mathilde -- obsessed with appearances as she is -- thinks it to be, judging by how casually her friend lets her borrow it, and how the clasp easily broke.
Changed line(s) 16 (click to see context) from:
* MockMillionaire: Mathilde's lady friend. Of her assorted collection of jewelry, the most valuable-looking of the lot is ''that'' fake necklace, and it's very likely her other jewels are probably duplicates aa well.
to:
* MockMillionaire: Mathilde's lady friend. Of her assorted collection of jewelry, the most valuable-looking of the lot is ''that'' fake necklace, and it's very likely her other jewels are probably duplicates aa as well.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 26 (click to see context) from:
to:
* WhamLine: The last line delivered by Mathilde's friend. In certain republised versions, the story literally ends ''after'' said line.
--> "[[spoiler: Oh my poor Mathilde! My necklace is made of paste! It's worth at most 700 francs!]]"
--> "[[spoiler: Oh my poor Mathilde! My necklace is made of paste! It's worth at most 700 francs!]]"
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 16 (click to see context) from:
* MockMillionaire
to:
* MockMillionaireMockMillionaire: Mathilde's lady friend. Of her assorted collection of jewelry, the most valuable-looking of the lot is ''that'' fake necklace, and it's very likely her other jewels are probably duplicates aa well.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 10 (click to see context) from:
* AnAesop: Admit to your mistakes up front; trying to run away from them will make it worse.
to:
* AnAesop: Admit to your mistakes up front; trying to run away from them will only make it things worse.
Changed line(s) 13,14 (click to see context) from:
* {{Foreshadowing}} : There's some hint that the necklace isn't as valuable as Mathilde -- obsessed with appearances as she is -- thinks it to be, judging by how casually her friend lets her borrow it.
* KarmicTwistEnding: Mathilde borrows a diamond necklace from her jeweler friend to wear at a state gala. She ends up losing it, and instead of telling her friend the truth, she and her husband have a replacement made and return that one, borrowing so much money that they end up struggling in debt for ten years. Just after they finally repay all the loans, she sees her friend for the first time in a decade and tells the woman the story of the necklace. Her horrified friend then informs her that the necklace had been fake and was only worth one-seventieth of what they paid for the replacement.
* KarmicTwistEnding: Mathilde borrows a diamond necklace from her jeweler friend to wear at a state gala. She ends up losing it, and instead of telling her friend the truth, she and her husband have a replacement made and return that one, borrowing so much money that they end up struggling in debt for ten years. Just after they finally repay all the loans, she sees her friend for the first time in a decade and tells the woman the story of the necklace. Her horrified friend then informs her that the necklace had been fake and was only worth one-seventieth of what they paid for the replacement.
to:
* {{Foreshadowing}} : There's some hint that the necklace isn't as valuable as Mathilde -- obsessed with appearances as she is -- thinks it to be, judging by how casually her friend lets her borrow it.
it, and how the clasp easily broke.
* KarmicTwistEnding: Mathilde borrows a diamond necklace from herjeweler wealthier friend to wear at a state gala. She ends up losing it, and instead of telling her friend the truth, she and her husband have a replacement made and return that one, borrowing so much money that they end up struggling in debt for ten years. Just after they finally repay all the loans, she sees her friend for the first time in a decade and tells the woman the story of the necklace. Her horrified friend then informs her that the necklace had been fake and was only worth one-seventieth of what they paid for the replacement.
* KarmicTwistEnding: Mathilde borrows a diamond necklace from her
Changed line(s) 18 (click to see context) from:
* NeverMyFault: While it's understandable that Mathilde feels resentful after ten years of misery, she claims that all the suffering was because of her friend, when she reveals the truth to her. If she had told the truth ''a decade before,'' she wouldn't be in this mess.
to:
* NeverMyFault: While it's understandable that Mathilde feels resentful after ten years of misery, she claims that all the suffering was because of her friend, when she reveals the truth to her. If she Mathilde had told the truth ''a decade before,'' she wouldn't be in this mess.
Changed line(s) 22 (click to see context) from:
* PoorCommunicationKills: Not admitting to the lost necklace or that the necklace was fake in the first place resulted in Matilde and her husband working themselves ragged to replace a piece of costume jewelry with a real one.
to:
* PoorCommunicationKills: Not admitting to the lost necklace necklace, or that the necklace was fake in the first place place, resulted in Matilde and her husband working themselves ragged to replace a piece of costume jewelry with a real one.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 11 (click to see context) from:
* BrokenTreasure: [[{{Deconstruction}} Deconstructed.]] It turns out that the 'treasure' isn't what it seems to be, and was worth ''substantially'' less than its' replacement.
to:
* BrokenTreasure: [[{{Deconstruction}} Deconstructed.]] It turns out that the 'treasure' isn't what it seems to be, and was worth ''substantially'' less than its' its replacement.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 10,11 (click to see context) from:
* AnAesop: Admit to your mistakes up front, trying to run away from them will make it worse.
* BrokenTreasure: [[{{Deconstruction}} Deconstructed.]]
* BrokenTreasure: [[{{Deconstruction}} Deconstructed.]]
to:
* AnAesop: Admit to your mistakes up front, front; trying to run away from them will make it worse.
* BrokenTreasure: [[{{Deconstruction}} Deconstructed.]]]] It turns out that the 'treasure' isn't what it seems to be, and was worth ''substantially'' less than its' replacement.
* BrokenTreasure: [[{{Deconstruction}} Deconstructed.
Added DiffLines:
* {{Foreshadowing}} : There's some hint that the necklace isn't as valuable as Mathilde -- obsessed with appearances as she is -- thinks it to be, judging by how casually her friend lets her borrow it.
Added DiffLines:
* NeverMyFault: While it's understandable that Mathilde feels resentful after ten years of misery, she claims that all the suffering was because of her friend, when she reveals the truth to her. If she had told the truth ''a decade before,'' she wouldn't be in this mess.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 20 (click to see context) from:
* PoorCommunicationKills
to:
* PoorCommunicationKills PoorCommunicationKills: Not admitting to the lost necklace or that the necklace was fake in the first place resulted in Matilde and her husband working themselves ragged to replace a piece of costume jewelry with a real one.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 22,24 (click to see context) from:
* ShaggyDogStory: This story's version of the trope is so strong, it nearly crosses over to ShootTheShaggyDog territory (if the reader wasn't laughing from the story's cruel irony). What saves it from that extreme is that the situation could have been ''very'' easily avoided, had the couple simply [[PoorCommunicationKills admitted]] that they lost the necklace in the first place.
** It also could have been avoided if the friend had simply told her the necklace was an imitation right from the start
** Or if Matilde wasn't so deathly prideful.
** It also could have been avoided if the friend had simply told her the necklace was an imitation right from the start
** Or if Matilde wasn't so deathly prideful.
to:
* ShaggyDogStory: This story's version of the trope is so strong, it nearly crosses over to ShootTheShaggyDog territory (if the reader wasn't laughing from the story's cruel irony). What saves it from that extreme is that the situation could have been ''very'' easily avoided, had the couple had Matilde not been so deathly prideful and she and her husband simply [[PoorCommunicationKills admitted]] that they lost the necklace in the first place.
** Itplace. (Admittedly, it also could have been avoided if the friend had simply told her the necklace was an imitation right from the start
** Or if Matilde wasn't so deathly prideful.start!)
** It
** Or if Matilde wasn't so deathly prideful.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
[[quoteright:350:https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/the_necklace.jpg]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* {{Pride}}: The cause of the heroine's troubles is that she didn't want to admit to losing the necklace -- had she unbent enough to tell the truth, she would have been spared a lot of suffering.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** Or if Matilde wasn't so deathly prideful.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
from Guy De Maupassant
Changed line(s) 11 (click to see context) from:
* KarmicTwistEnding
to:
* KarmicTwistEndingKarmicTwistEnding: Mathilde borrows a diamond necklace from her jeweler friend to wear at a state gala. She ends up losing it, and instead of telling her friend the truth, she and her husband have a replacement made and return that one, borrowing so much money that they end up struggling in debt for ten years. Just after they finally repay all the loans, she sees her friend for the first time in a decade and tells the woman the story of the necklace. Her horrified friend then informs her that the necklace had been fake and was only worth one-seventieth of what they paid for the replacement.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Could Have Avoided This Plot requires it be acknowledged in-universe.
Changed line(s) 19 (click to see context) from:
* ShaggyDogStory: This story's version of the trope is so strong, it nearly crosses over to ShootTheShaggyDog territory (if the reader wasn't laughing from the story's cruel irony). What saves it from that extreme is that the situation could have been ''very'' [[CouldHaveAvoidedThisPlot easily avoided]], had the couple simply [[PoorCommunicationKills admitted]] that they lost the necklace in the first place.
to:
* ShaggyDogStory: This story's version of the trope is so strong, it nearly crosses over to ShootTheShaggyDog territory (if the reader wasn't laughing from the story's cruel irony). What saves it from that extreme is that the situation could have been ''very'' [[CouldHaveAvoidedThisPlot easily avoided]], avoided, had the couple simply [[PoorCommunicationKills admitted]] that they lost the necklace in the first place.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
* IWasQuiteALooker: After paying off the necklace, Mathilde and her husband are poor and must work to survive. Mathilde starts losing her looks as a result and by the time she meets her friend, she's unrecognizable.
Changed line(s) 13,14 (click to see context) from:
* NeverLendToAFriend
* NoAntagonist
* NoAntagonist
to:
* NeverLendToAFriend
NeverLendToAFriend: Mathilde borrows a diamond necklace from her friend, loses it, and pays her and her husband's life savings for that necklace.
*NoAntagonistNoAntagonist: It's arguable that {{Pride}} is the worst enemy of Mathilde and her husband.
*
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
*NoNameGiven: Of the young couple, only Mathilde's name is given, her husband and friend's are not.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3,4 (click to see context) from:
A young, lower middle class couple borrows some nice clothes and jewelry from an upper class friend to wear to a party. During the course of the party, the lady loses the stunning necklace that she borrowed from her friend. Hiding the truth, the couple sell their house and take out an exceedingly harsh loan to buy a diamond necklace to replace it, and work for the next ten years to pay back the debt...only to be told at the end of the story by the lady's friend that the original necklace was ''costume jewelry,'' worth only a couple of dollars at the most.
to:
A young, lower middle class couple couple borrows some nice clothes and jewelry from an upper class friend to wear to a party. During the course of the party, the lady lady, named Mathilde, loses the stunning necklace that she borrowed from her friend. Hiding the truth, the couple sell their house and take out an exceedingly harsh loan to buy a diamond necklace to replace it, and work for the next ten years to pay back the debt...only to be told at the end of the story by the lady's friend that the original necklace was ''costume jewelry,'' worth only a couple of dollars at the most.
Changed line(s) 10 (click to see context) from:
* BreakTheHaughty: The lady's desire for finer things than what she and her husband can afford are partly what gets them into the mess in the first place. By the end of the story, she's had to go through a lot to pay for that one moment of indulgence.
to:
* BreakTheHaughty: The lady's Matilde's desire for finer things than what she and her husband can afford are partly what gets them into the mess in the first place. By the end of the story, she's had to go through a lot to pay for that one moment of indulgence.
Changed line(s) 15 (click to see context) from:
* NoDoubtTheYearsHaveChangedMe: When the lady meets her friend again at the end of the story, the friend doesn't recognise her at first because of all she's gone through to pay off the second necklace.
to:
* NoDoubtTheYearsHaveChangedMe: When the lady Mathilde meets her friend again at the end of the story, the friend doesn't recognise her at first because of all she's gone through to pay off the second necklace.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3,4 (click to see context) from:
A young, lower middle class couple borrows some nice clothes and jewelry from an upper class friend to wear to a party. During the course of the party, the lady loses the necklace that she borrowed from her friend. Hiding the truth, the couple sell their house and take out an exceedingly harsh loan to buy a diamond necklace to replace it, and work for the next twenty years to pay back the debt...only to be told at the end of the story by the lady's friend that the original necklace was ''costume jewelry,'' worth only a couple of dollars at the most.
to:
A young, lower middle class couple borrows some nice clothes and jewelry from an upper class friend to wear to a party. During the course of the party, the lady loses the stunning necklace that she borrowed from her friend. Hiding the truth, the couple sell their house and take out an exceedingly harsh loan to buy a diamond necklace to replace it, and work for the next twenty ten years to pay back the debt...only to be told at the end of the story by the lady's friend that the original necklace was ''costume jewelry,'' worth only a couple of dollars at the most.
Added DiffLines:
* BreakTheHaughty: The lady's desire for finer things than what she and her husband can afford are partly what gets them into the mess in the first place. By the end of the story, she's had to go through a lot to pay for that one moment of indulgence.
Added DiffLines:
** It also could have been avoided if the friend had simply told her the necklace was an imitation right from the start
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 14 (click to see context) from:
* NoDoubtTheYearsHaveChangedMe: When the lady meets her friend again at the end of the story, the friend doesn't recognise her at first because of all she's gone through to pay off the necklace.
to:
* NoDoubtTheYearsHaveChangedMe: When the lady meets her friend again at the end of the story, the friend doesn't recognise her at first because of all she's gone through to pay off the second necklace.
Changed line(s) 16 (click to see context) from:
* ShaggyDogStory: This story's version of the trope is so strong, it nearly crosses over to ShootTheShaggyDog territory (if the reader wasn't laughing from the story's cruel irony). What saves it from that extreme is that the situation could have been ''very'' [[CouldHaveAvoidedThisPlot easily avoided]], had the couple [[PoorCommunicationKills admitted]] that they lost the necklace in the first place.
to:
* ShaggyDogStory: This story's version of the trope is so strong, it nearly crosses over to ShootTheShaggyDog territory (if the reader wasn't laughing from the story's cruel irony). What saves it from that extreme is that the situation could have been ''very'' [[CouldHaveAvoidedThisPlot easily avoided]], had the couple simply [[PoorCommunicationKills admitted]] that they lost the necklace in the first place.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3,4 (click to see context) from:
A young, lower middle class couple borrows some nice clothes and jewelry from an upper class friend to wear to a party. During the course of the party, the lady loses a necklace. Hiding the truth, the two sell their house and take out an exceedingly harsh loan to buy a diamond necklace to replace it, and work for the next twenty years to pay back the debt, only to be told at the end the original necklace was costume jewelry, worth only a couple of dollars at the most.
to:
A young, lower middle class couple borrows some nice clothes and jewelry from an upper class friend to wear to a party. During the course of the party, the lady loses a necklace. the necklace that she borrowed from her friend. Hiding the truth, the two couple sell their house and take out an exceedingly harsh loan to buy a diamond necklace to replace it, and work for the next twenty years to pay back the debt, debt...only to be told at the end of the story by the lady's friend that the original necklace was costume jewelry, ''costume jewelry,'' worth only a couple of dollars at the most.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3,4 (click to see context) from:
A young, lower middle class couple borrows some nice clothes and jewelry from an upper class friend to wear to a party. During the course of the party, the lady loses a necklace. Hiding the truth, the two sell their house and all their possessions to buy a diamond necklace to replace it, and work for the next twenty years to pay back the loan, only to be told at the end the original necklace was costume jewelry, worth only a couple of dollars at the most.
to:
A young, lower middle class couple borrows some nice clothes and jewelry from an upper class friend to wear to a party. During the course of the party, the lady loses a necklace. Hiding the truth, the two sell their house and all their possessions take out an exceedingly harsh loan to buy a diamond necklace to replace it, and work for the next twenty years to pay back the loan, debt, only to be told at the end the original necklace was costume jewelry, worth only a couple of dollars at the most.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3,4 (click to see context) from:
A young, lower middle class couple borrows some nice clothes and jewelry from an upper class friend to wear to a party. During the course of the party, the lady loses a diamond necklace. Hiding the truth, the two sell their house and all their possessions and work for the next twenty years to pay the friend back, only to be told at the end it was costume jewelry, and worth only a couple of dollars at the most.
to:
A young, lower middle class couple borrows some nice clothes and jewelry from an upper class friend to wear to a party. During the course of the party, the lady loses a diamond necklace. Hiding the truth, the two sell their house and all their possessions to buy a diamond necklace to replace it, and work for the next twenty years to pay back the friend back, loan, only to be told at the end it the original necklace was costume jewelry, and worth only a couple of dollars at the most.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Deleted line(s) 18 (click to see context) :
* WhatAnIdiot: You’d think she would have at least momentarily wondered why a necklace supposedly worth thousands upon thousands of francs would break and fall off her neck.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 18 (click to see context) from:
* TooDumbToLive
to:
* TooDumbToLiveWhatAnIdiot: You’d think she would have at least momentarily wondered why a necklace supposedly worth thousands upon thousands of francs would break and fall off her neck.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 8 (click to see context) from:
* AnAesop: Basically, know your place. Or honesty is the best policy.
to:
* AnAesop: Basically, know Admit to your place. Or honesty is the best policy. mistakes up front, trying to run away from them will make it worse.
* NoAntagonist
Changed line(s) 14 (click to see context) from:
* ShaggyDogStory: This story's version of the trope is so strong, it nearly crosses over to ShootTheShaggyDog territory (if the reader wasn't laughing from the story's cruel irony). What saves it from that extreme is that the situation could have been ''very'' easily avoided, had the couple admitted that they lost the necklace in the first place.
to:
* PoorCommunicationKills
* ShaggyDogStory: This story's version of the trope is so strong, it nearly crosses over to ShootTheShaggyDog territory (if the reader wasn't laughing from the story's cruel irony). What saves it from that extreme is that the situation could have been ''very'' [[CouldHaveAvoidedThisPlot easilyavoided, avoided]], had the couple admitted [[PoorCommunicationKills admitted]] that they lost the necklace in the first place.
* ShaggyDogStory: This story's version of the trope is so strong, it nearly crosses over to ShootTheShaggyDog territory (if the reader wasn't laughing from the story's cruel irony). What saves it from that extreme is that the situation could have been ''very'' [[CouldHaveAvoidedThisPlot easily
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1,2 (click to see context) from:
''TheNecklace'' is an 1884 short story by Guy de Maussapant.
to:
Changed line(s) 13 (click to see context) from:
* ShaggyDogStory: This story's version of the trope is so strong, it nearly crosses over to ShootTheShaggyDog territory (if the reader wasn't laughing from the story's cruel irony). What saves it from that extreme is that the situation could have been ''very'' easily avoided, had the couple admitted that they lost the necklace in the first place.
to:
* NoDoubtTheYearsHaveChangedMe: When the lady meets her friend again at the end of the story, the friend doesn't recognise her at first because of all she's gone through to pay off the necklace.
* ShaggyDogStory: This story's version of the trope is so strong, it nearly crosses over to ShootTheShaggyDog territory (if the reader wasn't laughing from the story's cruel irony). What saves it from that extreme is that the situation could have been ''very'' easily avoided, had the couple admitted that they lost the necklace in the firstplace.place.
* StormInATeacup: Played for drama.
----
* ShaggyDogStory: This story's version of the trope is so strong, it nearly crosses over to ShootTheShaggyDog territory (if the reader wasn't laughing from the story's cruel irony). What saves it from that extreme is that the situation could have been ''very'' easily avoided, had the couple admitted that they lost the necklace in the first
* StormInATeacup: Played for drama.
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Changed line(s) 10 (click to see context) from:
* ShaggyDogStory: This story's version of the trope is so strong, it nearly crosses over to ShootTheShaggyDog territory (if the reader wasn't laughing from the story's cruel irony). What saves it from that extreme is that the situation could have been ''very'' easily avoided, had the couple admitted that they lost the necklace in the first place.
to:
* ShaggyDogStory: This story's version of the trope is so strong, it nearly crosses over to ShootTheShaggyDog territory (if the reader wasn't laughing from the story's cruel irony). What saves it from that extreme is that the situation could have been ''very'' easily avoided, had the couple admitted that they lost the necklace in the first place. KarmicTwistEnding
Changed line(s) 13 (click to see context) from:
* TwilightZoneTwist
to:
* TwilightZoneTwistShaggyDogStory: This story's version of the trope is so strong, it nearly crosses over to ShootTheShaggyDog territory (if the reader wasn't laughing from the story's cruel irony). What saves it from that extreme is that the situation could have been ''very'' easily avoided, had the couple admitted that they lost the necklace in the first place.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1,2 (click to see context) from:
''TheNecklace'' is a short story by Guy de Maussapant.
to:
''TheNecklace'' is a an 1884 short story by Guy de Maussapant.