Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Literature / HowNotToWriteANovel

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HoYay: "We're Going to Need a Bigger Closet", specifically for unintentional homoerotic subtext.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* PetTheDog: "[[EvenBadMeLoveTheirMamas But He Loves His Mother]]". We're told that trying to use this in order to make a one-dimensional villain seem human is a bad idea; instead we should try to make the villain ''not'' one-dimensional and make their evilness believable.

to:

* PetTheDog: "[[EvenBadMeLoveTheirMamas "[[EvenBadMenLoveTheirMamas But He Loves His Mother]]". We're told that trying to use this in order to make a one-dimensional villain seem human is a bad idea; instead we should try to make the villain ''not'' one-dimensional and make their evilness believable.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Also "The Fig Leaf", where the author is clearly indulging in a vice but, vaguely self-aware about it, is trying to make themselves seem above it. Discouraged in that it doesn't work and usually makes them look like a bit of a hypocrite to boot.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* FauxlosophicNarration: "The Overture" -- ''Wherein the prologue is a brief guide to the meaning of life''. Discouraged.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* UnintentionallySympathetic[=/=]UnintentionallyUnsympathetic: Discussed in "Prince Charming Doesn't Deserve Me"; in the example provided, the author clearly intends the protagonist's boyfriend to be unsympathetic, but only gives him minor flaws, whereas the supposedly sympathetic protagonist would immediately be recognised by anyone sane as an unreasonable, selfish harpy.

to:

* UnintentionallySympathetic[=/=]UnintentionallyUnsympathetic: Discussed and discouraged in "Prince Charming Doesn't Deserve Me"; in the example provided, the author clearly intends the protagonist's boyfriend to be unsympathetic, but only gives him minor flaws, whereas the supposedly sympathetic protagonist would immediately be recognised by anyone sane as an unreasonable, selfish harpy.[[invoked]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* SeriousBusiness: A lot of the excerpts have their authors attempt to create a lot of drama out of seemingly non-dramatic scenarios. Such as the eternal battle for ergo-hydraulics, a love affair based on a mutual love of toggles, and a lot of funny business surrounding an optometrist.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* RunningGag: In an AliceAndBob sort of way, they use several characters multiple times: Chip; Jack and Synthya; LeonardCohen; Joe and Melinda (especially Melinda), [[NamesToRunAwayFromReallyFast the evil Nefaro]], [[SantaClaus Santa]]... there are many, occasionally unrelated. In addition to those, we have the phrase "medium-sized breasts," misuse of the word "ironically," mistranslations of "DeusExMachina," and several other small jokes that you wouldn't get if you started reading a random segment. There are also many, many one-off {{Call Back}}s and {{Call Forward}}s.

to:

* RunningGag: In an AliceAndBob sort of way, they use several characters multiple times: Chip; Jack and Synthya; LeonardCohen; Joe and Melinda (especially Melinda), [[NamesToRunAwayFromReallyFast the evil Nefaro]], [[SantaClaus Santa]]... there are many, occasionally unrelated. In addition to those, we have the phrase "medium-sized breasts," breasts" (or "perfect breasts" for variety), misuse of the word "ironically," mistranslations of "DeusExMachina," and several other small jokes that you wouldn't get if you started reading a random segment. There are also many, many one-off {{Call Back}}s and {{Call Forward}}s.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

-->Generally, saying 'edifice' instead of 'building' doesn't tell your reader anything more about the building; it tells your reader that you know the word edifice.

Added: 167

Changed: 167

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* {{Wangst}}: Warned against in "Compassion Fatigue": "Readers can identify with a protagonist who is a geek or a failure, but when all that character does is fail and wallow, identification becomes an unwelcome burden".[[invoked]]

to:

* {{Wangst}}: Warned against in "Compassion Fatigue": "Readers Fatigue":[[invoked]]
-->Readers
can identify with a protagonist who is a geek or a failure, but when all that character does is fail and wallow, identification becomes an unwelcome burden".[[invoked]]burden.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Nefarious plots and doings surrounding an optometrist.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* StrawFeminist: The excerpt of "The Fearless Expose" stars these.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* UnintentionallySympathetic[=/=]UnintentionallyUnsympathetic: Discussed in "Prince Charming Doesn't Deserve Me"; the author clearly intends the protagonist's boyfriend to be unsympathetic, but only gives him minor flaws, whereas the supposedly sympathetic protagonist would immediately be recognised by anyone sane as an unreasonable, selfish harpy.

to:

* UnintentionallySympathetic[=/=]UnintentionallyUnsympathetic: Discussed in "Prince Charming Doesn't Deserve Me"; in the example provided, the author clearly intends the protagonist's boyfriend to be unsympathetic, but only gives him minor flaws, whereas the supposedly sympathetic protagonist would immediately be recognised by anyone sane as an unreasonable, selfish harpy.

Added: 1055

Changed: 8

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* GoodAdulteryBadAdultery: Discussed in "Prince Charming Doesn't Deserve Me"; in particular, they recommend at the very least having the protagonist's significant other cheat first, as what the protagonist does after that "doesn't feel like cheating".



* RomanticFalseLead: Discussed in "Prince Charming Doesn't Deserve Me": They don't recommend against the trope per say, but they do caution against making the False Lead too UnintentionallySympathetic or the protagonist too UnintentionallyUnsympathetic in the process. They also recommend that the nice-but-dull variation can be traded in for a better model, but only if the protagonist shows an appropriate amount of remorse rather than vindictive glee.



* UnintentionallySympathetic[=/=]UnintentionallyUnsympathetic: Discussed in "Prince Charming Doesn't Deserve Me"; the author clearly intends the protagonist's boyfriend to be unsympathetic, but only gives him minor flaws, whereas the supposedly sympathetic protagonist would immediately be recognised by anyone sane as an unreasonable, selfish harpy.



* {{Wangst}}: Warned against in "Compassion Fatigue": "Readers can identify with a protagonist who is a geek or a failure, but when all that character does is fail and wallow, identification becomes an unwelcome burden".{{invoked}}

to:

* {{Wangst}}: Warned against in "Compassion Fatigue": "Readers can identify with a protagonist who is a geek or a failure, but when all that character does is fail and wallow, identification becomes an unwelcome burden".{{invoked}}[[invoked]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* {{Wangst}}: Warned against in "Compassion Fatigue": "Readers can identify with a protagonist who is a geek or a failure, but when all that character does is fail and wallow, identification becomes an unwelcome burden." {{invoked}}

to:

* {{Wangst}}: Warned against in "Compassion Fatigue": "Readers can identify with a protagonist who is a geek or a failure, but when all that character does is fail and wallow, identification becomes an unwelcome burden." burden".{{invoked}}
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* {{Wangst}}: Warned against in "Compassion Fatigue": "Readers can identify with a protagonist who is a geek or a failure, but when all that character does is fail and wallow, identification becomes an unwelcome burden."{{invoked}}

to:

* {{Wangst}}: Warned against in "Compassion Fatigue": "Readers can identify with a protagonist who is a geek or a failure, but when all that character does is fail and wallow, identification becomes an unwelcome burden."{{invoked}}" {{invoked}}
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* {{Wangst}}: Warned against in "Compassion Fatigue": "Readers can identify with a protagonist who is a geek or a failure, but when all that character does is fail and wallow, identification becomes an unwelcome burden."{{invoked}}



----

to:

----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* RunningGag: In an AliceAndBob sort of way, they use several characters multiple times: Chip; Jack and Synthya; LeonardCohen; Joe and Melinda (especially Melinda), [[NamesToRunAwayFromReallyFast the evil Nefaro]], [[SantaClaus Santa]]... there are many, occasionally unrelated. In addition to those, we have the phrase "medium-sized breasts," misuse of the word "ironically," and several other small jokes that you wouldn't get if you started reading a random segment. Many, many one-off {{Call Back}}s and {{Call Forward}}s.

to:

* RunningGag: In an AliceAndBob sort of way, they use several characters multiple times: Chip; Jack and Synthya; LeonardCohen; Joe and Melinda (especially Melinda), [[NamesToRunAwayFromReallyFast the evil Nefaro]], [[SantaClaus Santa]]... there are many, occasionally unrelated. In addition to those, we have the phrase "medium-sized breasts," misuse of the word "ironically," mistranslations of "DeusExMachina," and several other small jokes that you wouldn't get if you started reading a random segment. Many, There are also many, many one-off {{Call Back}}s and {{Call Forward}}s.



** The leg of mutton. It was the only clue.
** The second [insert incident here] at the laundromat.

to:

** The [[TalesOfTheUnexpected leg of mutton.mutton]]. It was the only clue.
** The second "The Second [insert incident here] at the laundromat.lLaundromat."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* PetTheDog: "But He Loves His Mother". We're told that trying to use this in order to make a one-dimensional villain seem human is a bad idea; instead we should try to make the villain ''not'' one-dimensional and make their evilness believable.

to:

* PetTheDog: "But "[[EvenBadMeLoveTheirMamas But He Loves His Mother".Mother]]". We're told that trying to use this in order to make a one-dimensional villain seem human is a bad idea; instead we should try to make the villain ''not'' one-dimensional and make their evilness believable.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* RunningGag: In an AliceAndBob sort of way, they use several characters multiple times: Chip; Jack and Synthya; LeonardCohen; Joe and Melinda (especially Melinda), [[NamesToRunAwayFromReallyFast the evil Nefaro]], [[SantaClaus Santa]]... there are many, occasionally unrelated. In addition to those, we have the phrase "medium-sized breasts," misuse of the word "ironically," and several other small jokes that you wouldn't get if you started reading a random segment. That's not to mention the many, many one-off {{Call Back}}s and {{Call Forward}}s.

to:

* RunningGag: In an AliceAndBob sort of way, they use several characters multiple times: Chip; Jack and Synthya; LeonardCohen; Joe and Melinda (especially Melinda), [[NamesToRunAwayFromReallyFast the evil Nefaro]], [[SantaClaus Santa]]... there are many, occasionally unrelated. In addition to those, we have the phrase "medium-sized breasts," misuse of the word "ironically," and several other small jokes that you wouldn't get if you started reading a random segment. That's not to mention the many, Many, many one-off {{Call Back}}s and {{Call Forward}}s.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Don't forget that at least two people in the samples own cats named Bartok.

to:

** Don't forget that at At least two people in the samples own cats named Bartok.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* PetTheDog: "But He Loves His Mother". We're told that trying to use this in order to make a one-dimensional vilain seem human is a bad idea; instead we should try to make the villain ''not'' one-dimensional and make their evilness believable.

to:

* PetTheDog: "But He Loves His Mother". We're told that trying to use this in order to make a one-dimensional vilain villain seem human is a bad idea; instead we should try to make the villain ''not'' one-dimensional and make their evilness believable.

Added: 139

Changed: 39

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AnachronicOrder: They have no problem with this trope at the level of the broader form and structure of the novel (even recommending the use of InMediasRes if the chronological opening of the story is rather slow), but provide a example of it used rather poorly in "Linearity Shrugged", in which shifts in chronology and subject matter happen after every other sentence.

to:

* AnachronicOrder: They have no problem with this trope at the level of the broader form and structure of the novel (even recommending the use of InMediasRes if the chronological opening of the story is rather slow), but provide a example of it used rather poorly in "Linearity Shrugged", in which shifts in chronology and subject matter happen after every other sentence.sentence, making the story impossible to follow.


Added DiffLines:

* AnatomicallyImpossibleSex: Examined. Writing sex scenes that move out of the domain of physical possibility are generaly not a good idea.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* NoYay: "Last Tango in Santa's Village".[[invoked]]

to:

* NoYay: "Last Tango in Santa's Village".[[invoked]][[invoked]] Yes, it's exactly what it sounds like.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Removing wick to Did Not Do The Research per rename at TRS.


* DidNotDoTheResearch: The chapter ''Research and Historical Background'' in its entirety (except for "The Research Paper", which is about ShownTheirWork taken to its logical extreme).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* TheDogWasTheMastermind: A literal example - the writers observe that unless the protagonist's cat is the one solving the murder mysteries the entire time, the cat should receive about as much attention in the narrative as the couch they are sitting on.


Added DiffLines:

* HoYay: "We're Going to Need a Bigger Closet", specifically for unintentional homoerotic subtext.


Added DiffLines:

* ProtagonistCenteredMorality: "Prince Charming Doesn't Deserve Me" is closely related to this.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** ''Folie adieu'' is used to refer to a sudden ToneShift ShockingSwerve at the end, causing crippling MoodWhiplash that makes the novel unsellable. It is a pun on a [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Folie_%C3%A0_deux folie a deux]], a "madness shared by two," and means, "Goodbye madness," not "are you [[BrickJoke FUCKING]] kidding me?"

to:

** ''Folie adieu'' is used to refer to a sudden ToneShift ShockingSwerve at the end, causing crippling MoodWhiplash that makes the novel unsellable. It is a pun on a [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Folie_%C3%A0_deux folie a deux]], a "madness shared by two," and means, translates as "Goodbye madness," not "are madness" (Not, that is, "[[RunningGag are you [[BrickJoke FUCKING]] FUCKING kidding me?"me?]]")
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
removing ymmv


* GeniusBonus / DidNotDoTheResearch: Their slam on ShownTheirWork throws in a whopper. The biologist mentions sexual reproduction's origin in algae 2.7 ''million'' years ago. That error is off by about three orders of magnitude - a factor of about a thousand. (To put that in perspective, it's like saying the distance between LA and New York is roughly three miles.) We certainly also don't have a common ancestor with algae at this time; any common ancestor between humans and algae would have lived long before this. Due to StylisticSuck, it's impossible to tell if the authors were sneaking in one more example of how important research is, including a little bonus, or failing biology harder than a Kansas school board while telling authors they cannot make afford to make such mistakes themselves.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
removing ymmv


** ''Folie adieu'' is used to refer to a sudden ToneShift ShockingSwerve at the end, causing crippling MoodWhiplash that makes the novel unsellable. It is a GeniusBonus and BilingualBonus; it is a pun on a [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Folie_%C3%A0_deux folie a deux]], a "madness shared by two," and means, "Goodbye madness," not "are you [[BrickJoke FUCKING]] kidding me?"

to:

** ''Folie adieu'' is used to refer to a sudden ToneShift ShockingSwerve at the end, causing crippling MoodWhiplash that makes the novel unsellable. It is a GeniusBonus and BilingualBonus; it is a pun on a [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Folie_%C3%A0_deux folie a deux]], a "madness shared by two," and means, "Goodbye madness," not "are you [[BrickJoke FUCKING]] kidding me?"

Added: 83

Removed: 85

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
trope renamed at TRS (though I question whether this fits)


* ChekhovsPun: "Hello, I am the [example]!", "The Second [example] in the Laundromat"


Added DiffLines:

* SnowClone: "Hello, I am the [example]!", "The Second [example] in the Laundromat"
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Moving to correct namespace

Added DiffLines:

->We do not propose any rules; we offer observations. "No right on red" is a rule. "Driving at high speed toward a brick wall usually ends badly" is an observation.

''How NOT to Write a Novel'' is a self-help [[BooksOnTrope Book on Trope]] by Howard Mittelmark and Sandra Newman. It deals a lot with tropes (and improper use of them), and even contains some tropes itself.

The book, naturally, is about [[ExactlyWhatItSaysOnTheTin how not to write a novel.]] It is probably the only self-help book that you'll want to read over and over, because it's actually ''funny''. It includes many "samples" (written by the authors, though they claim they're [[VeryLooselyBasedOnATrueStory based on submissions they received as editors]]) of writing that range from "good prose, but used tropes vitally wrong" to "[[BileFascination OhmygodIcan'tlookbutIhaveto.]]"
----
!!Examples given:

* AbusiveParents: Discouraged in "A Novel Called It", with the explanation that they are simply hard to write well and hard to read about without puking. They also suggest that horror is the best genre for handling this trope well, using ''{{Carrie}}'' as an example.
* AccidentalInnuendo: "The Deafening Hug". [[invoked]]
* AnachronicOrder: They have no problem with this trope at the level of the broader form and structure of the novel (even recommending the use of InMediasRes if the chronological opening of the story is rather slow), but provide a example of it used rather poorly in "Linearity Shrugged", in which shifts in chronology and subject matter happen after every other sentence.
* AnachronismStew: "Xeno's iPod" for objects that just "appear".
* AntiClimax: "I'm Melting!"-''Wherein the villain conveniently gives up.''
* ApocalypticLog: "'And One Ring to Bind Them!' Said the Old Cowpoke" morphs into one.
* AsYouKnow: "But, Captain..." is a direct translation; "Hello, I am the Mommy!" and "Hello, I am the Medieval Knight!" are similar.
* AudienceAlienatingPremise: "Voice in the Wilderness" provides an example.[[invoked]]
* AuthorAppeal: "The High Colonic by Mail" advises against this, particularly if what appeals to the author is unlikely to appeal to anyone else.
* AuthorFilibuster: "The After-Dinner Sermon" ([[InWhichATropeIsDescribed In which the author wields a mallet]]).
* BeigeProse: "The Minimalist" (''wherein synopses take the place of writing'') and "The List of Ingredients" (''wherein lists substitute for description''). List of Ingredients has a particularly humorous example of bland description gone bad:
--> There were naked actors standing around the pornography studio: three women and one man. Two other actors were having sex on a bed. There were some cameramen filming them, who had their clothes on. There was a desk in the corner with papers on it, and a bulletin board with messages.
* BetterThanABareBulb: Advised against in "Preemptive Strike."
* BondageIsBad: "When To Kiss And Tell"
-->Scenes where the bad guy is given a creepy fetish in order to establish his depravity are becoming less and less of a good idea. In a time when fetishes [[SocietyMarchesOn are becoming a must-have for the really hip, urban professional]], you are likely to be stepping on the toes of many readers by using Nefaro's bondage thing as a [[KickTheDog shorthand for Evil]].
* CanonDiscontinuity: The real life variety, historical revisionism, is discouraged in "The Voice in the Wilderness"; the example is a story in which the Holocaust is a lie.
* CanYouHearMeNow: Discussed in "The Padded Cell".
* CaptainErsatz: Alluded to after a long speech on why not to try to sell fanfic which ends with "now go back and [[SerialNumbersFiledOff change all the names]]."
* ChekhovsGun: "The Gum on the Mantelpiece". They even use a version of Chekhov's law: if there is gum on the mantelpiece in the first chapter, it must go on something by the last chapter. Also mentions "The RedHerring on the Mantelpiece." For bonus points, the example text for the "gum on the mantelpiece" is a Chekhov pastiche.
* ClicheStorm: "Breeding Contempt"[[invoked]]
* CluelessMystery: "The Service Interruption".
* CompleteMonster: "Inside the Mind of a Criminal"[[invoked]]
* ContemplateOurNavels: "Hamlet at the Deli" and "Men of Inaction."
* CostumePorn: "The Joan Rivers Pre-Novel Special" and "The Sharper Image Catalog". They discourage it whenever it interferes with the plot or slows down the pace of the novel, but acknowledge that [[CostumeDrama there are genres where it is practically mandatory]].
* CreatorBreakdown: "Revenge Is a Dish Best Served in Public"- ''Where the author has failed to move on.''
* DeusAngstMachina: "Compassion Fatigue".
* DeusExMachina: "But a Meteor Could Land There, Right?" The following description is even mentioned (in part) in a page quote for Deus Ex Machina.
-->This particular blunder is known as ''deus ex machina'', which is French for "Are you fucking kidding me?"
* DidNotDoTheResearch: The chapter ''Research and Historical Background'' in its entirety (except for "The Research Paper", which is about ShownTheirWork taken to its logical extreme).
* DreamSequence: "Mr. Sandman, on Second Thought, Bring Me a Gun." Discouraged.
* EasyEvangelism: Discouraged. "For similar reasons, characters should not make sudden about-faces in their attitudes. They should not, for instance, immediately capitulate when the protagonist 'proves' that their worldview is idiotic."
* EmphasizeEverything: "I Mean This!! It's Important!!!" Needless to say, they advise against it. See BoldInflation below.
* [[EmotionlessGirl Emotionless Character]]: "Failing the Turing Test", in which Professor Johnson finds a college student lying naked in his bed instead of his wife... and emotionlessly asks why she's there. She pulls out a gun and says that she's going to kill him...and he simply asks why. When she says that it's because he gives her a C, he says he'd be willing to reconsider if she does him a favor. And then, when she tries to seduce him, he asks her to be his cat-sitter.
* EvenBadMenLoveTheirMamas: A cheap way to get reader sympathy for the villains, illustrated in an example in which a character takes a moment off from gleefully forcing young girls into prostitution to reminisce fondly about his mother.
--> [[AdolfHitler Adolf]] [[NaziGermany introduces Fascism to Germany,]] [[WorldWarII spreads war throughout Europe,]] [[MoralEventHorizon murders millions in concentration camps]] -- but he's a strict vegetarian and [[PetTheDog loves his dog]]. Tossing in a touching scene with his German Shepherd Blondi and a dish of lentils won't make Hitler's character "balanced".
* FeaturelessPlaneOfDisembodiedDialogue: "The Convention of the Invisible Men".
-->Bare naked dialogue will eventually plunge the reader into a nighmarish science fiction scenario in which [[BrainInAJar two brains are conversing telepathically while suspended in a lightless tank of nutrient-rich fluid]]. (if you are in fact writing a novel about two brains conversing telepathically while suspended in a lightless tank of nutrient-rich fluid, [[JustifiedTrope carry on]]).
* FoodPorn: Discussed and discouraged in "The Food Channel".
* ForTheEvulz: "Inside the Mind of a Criminal".
* FreakierThanFiction: "Why Your Job is Harder Than God's".
* GenreBusting: They encourage it, with the caveat noted in GenreShift.
* GenreShift: "'And One Ring to Bind Them!' Said the Old Cowpoke". They emphasize that if you want to do this, it still has to be set up with {{Foreshadowing}} and the like, or else it comes across as very similar to a DeusExMachina.
* GetOnWithItAlready: "The Waiting Room" and "The Long Runway".
* HowDoIUsedTense: "Tenses: the Past Oblivious" (confusing, seemingly random shifts in tense) and "Tenses: the Past Intolerable" (where a single tense is used for everything).
* HumorDissonance: Discussed in the chapter on jokes, sex and post-modernism.[[invoked]]
* IKEAErotica: They even have a name along similar lines: "Assembly Instructions." One of the scenes in "The List of Ingredients" deserves a mention as well.
* InMediasRes: Recommended in a segment as "Radical Surgery for your Novel."
* InfiniteSupplies: "Magic-onomics", which specifically addresses money.
* IJustWriteTheThing: "The Fig Leaf"
* JustBetweenYouAndMe: "The Retirement Speech" and this quote, ''"Now that I have you in my power, I shall tell you my whole life story!"''
* MarySue[=/=]MartyStu[=/=]AuthorAvatar (but not so much that last one): "I Complete Me." They ''do'' say that it's perfectly acceptable, but when your character starts exhibiting Sue-like tendencies... well, don't pick out that outfit to wear on Oprah quite yet.[[invoked]]
** Several of the hypothetical examples also appear to have been written by authors placing themselves into the story too directly. Such as what appears to have been an action thriller written by an ergonomics expert.
* MeaningfulName: They discourage using names where the symbolic meaning of the name is blatantly obvious to any reader (for example, "Vivian", a character who symbolizes life, against "Morty", a character who symbolizes death).
* MillsAndBoonProse: "The Purple Blue Prose"
* AMinorKidroduction: "The Long Runway".
* NeverHeardThatOneBefore: "The Newborn Dinosaur." ''Never'' use jokes that everyone knows.
* NewPowersAsThePlotDemands: "And by the Way, I'm an Expert Marksman!"
* NoYay: "Last Tango in Santa's Village".[[invoked]]
* {{Padding}}: "The Second Argument in the Laundromat" (using more than one scene to establish a single fact), "The Redundant Tautology" (the author repeating him or herself) and "The Skipping Record" (a character's thoughts repeating themselves).[[invoked]]
* PetHomosexual: Discouraged in "Priscilla, Queen of the Clichés". Specifically, they note that many amateur writers seem to believe that once they've established that a given character is gay, the stereotypical catty, bitchy dialogue will write itself - which is, to say the least, rarely the case.
* PetTheDog: "But He Loves His Mother". We're told that trying to use this in order to make a one-dimensional vilain seem human is a bad idea; instead we should try to make the villain ''not'' one-dimensional and make their evilness believable.
** They also discourage this trope in its most literal sense: "It does not work to give a character a pet to make him or her sympathetic. People are often at their ''least'' sympathetic when cooing over a bored cat."
* ThePlotReaper: "Goodbye, Cruel Reader!" They say it's a bad idea and should only be used when absolutely necessary, and only when the writer has used ChekhovsGun to establish a heart condition/suicidal fixation/unsafe building etc.
* PlotTumor: With the conveniently similar name of "The Benign Tumor".
* PoliticallyCorrectHistory: Discouraged in "The Vegan Viking".
* PostModernism: "Hello! I Am the Author!" They recommend not trying it because, even though someone always manages to pull it off, it's really, really hard to. This includes using:
** AuthorAvatar (at least when the author is actually a character in their own novel)
** FootnoteFever
** UnconventionalFormatting
* PuritySue: "Too Good to Be True"- ''Wherein an attempt to make the protagonist sympathetic overshoots the mark.''[[invoked]]
* PurpleProse: "The Puffer Fish", "Mouth-Watering World-Class Prose," which reads like advertisements or blurbs, "Gibberish for Art's sake," which purposely tries to sound like the classic authors did. It also gives an example of "The Purple Blue Prose", which is a sexual version. And "The Crepitating Parasol," in which that fundamental line between "clever" and "stupid" is crossed due to using words you don't know.
* RandomEventsPlot: Implicitly discouraged - for the section dealing with "Plot", the subtitle is "Not just a bunch of stuff that happens".
* RedHerring: They encourage these to give a novel some added depth, though warn people to be careful of unintended examples (see WhatHappenedToTheMouse).
* RelationshipWritingFumble: A section dealing with unintended shipping ("The Deafening Hug"), HoYay ("We're Going to Need a Bigger Closet"), and suggested pedophilia ("Alice in Lapland"), and the actual article deals with accidental {{Brother Sister Incest}} shipping.[[invoked]]
* SaidBookism: "Asseverated the Man".
* SceneryPorn: "Vacation Slideshow".
* SenseFreak: "The Hothouse Plant," where sensory descriptions overwhelm the story.
* SesquipedalianLoquaciousness: "The Puffer Fish" and "The Crepitating Parasol" (using big words the reader doesn't know in a failed attempt to sound clever) and "The Crepuscular Handbag" [[YouKeepUsingThatWord (using big words]] ''[[YouKeepUsingThatWord you]]'' [[YouKeepUsingThatWord don't know in a failed attempt to sound clever)]].
* ShaggyDogStory: "The Benign Tumor", a section of the novel that is a ShaggyDogStory and can be completely removed with no effect on the rest of the story.
* ShapedLikeItself: "Ask yourself: 'do I know [[SesquipedalianLoquaciousness this word?']] If the answer is no, then you do not know it."
* ShowDontTell: Many examples allude to this concept; for example, they advise against the use of adverbs because the writer is in effect telling the reader what to think about their dialogue, rather than showing them.
* ShownTheirWork: "The Research Paper." "...But the glories of the Calvin cycle, and the further intricacies of the Krebs cycle, essential to cellular respiration, were little comfort now that..."
* SmurfettePrinciple: Mentioned in "Stag Night". "Especially prevalent in science fiction; apparently many writers assume that in the future [[{{Gendercide}} women will die out.]]"
* StereotypeGay: Discouraged in "Priscilla, Queen of the Clichés".
* SwitchingPOV: "Grabbing the Mike: Wherein the point of view momentarily strays", "The Tennis Match: Wherein the point of view bounces back and forth", "The Democracy: Where everyone is heard from" and "The Service Interruption: Wherein the point of view suffers a temporary blackout" are examples of how not to do this. They also recommend against writing from the perspective of a background character who only exists so that they can witness some key event (unless the novel already has numerous points of view).
* TakeOurWordForIt: Discouraged in "Words Fail Me" (''where the author stops short of communication.)''
* TextualCelebrityResemblance: Noted as a generally bad idea in "Channeling the E! Channel".
* ThisIsReality, mentioned under LampshadeHanging.
* TropesAreTools: They concede that most tropes, in the hands of skilled writers and in the right context, can be used effectively and well. They merely point out those that have a tendency to be used badly.
* TropeBreaker: They specifically refer to the damage done to the techno-thriller genre [[WhyWereBummedCommunismFell by the fall of Communism]], and also to several genres [[CanYouHearMeNow by the invention of the cellphone]].
* UnfortunateImplications: Dealt with in various forms in "The Road to the Trash Heap is Paved with Good Intentions".[[invoked]]
* UnspokenPlanGuarantee: Dealt with in "Deja Vu;" more specifically, the plan should always go wrong if spoken.
* VanityPublishing: Discussed, with the subsequent ProtectionFromEditors not necessarily being a good thing.
* WantonCrueltyToTheCommonComma and BoldInflation: "I Mean This!! It's Important!!"- "While commas, often appear, randomly in unpublished manuscripts--and there is an epidemic--of unnecessary--em-dashes, it is the exclamation mark which takes the most punishment." It also talks about Capitalizing Words The Author Thinks Are Important, and compares it to Ironic Capitalization, a combination of which is Repeatedly Used On This Very Wiki.
* TheWarOnStraw: "The Fearless Exposé".
* TheWatson: They encourage this to avoid the problem of [[AsYouKnow people telling each other things both of them already know]].
* WhatHappenedToTheMouse: "Oh, Don't Mind Him" - Where a character's personal problems (in the example the protagonist's brother, an alcoholic war veteran who seems to exist only to provide the protagonist with an inspirational conversation before he goes to Yale) remain unexplored. "The Gum on the Mantlepiece" is similar, a kind of unintentional RedHerring.
* TheWoobie: "Compassion Fatigue" is when this trope is done badly.[[invoked]]
* WorldOfSymbolism: Strongly discouraged in a discussion of symbolism following "The Timely Epiphany":
--> ''Above all, symbols should not be obvious. While a novel cannot do without plot or characters, your novel should work perfectly well for someone who doesn't notice the symbols at all.''
* YeOldeButcheredeEnglishe: "Yo, Charlemagne, how dost thy big war?"
* YouKeepUsingThatWord: "The Crepitating Parasol".
* XanatosRoulette: "The Riddler"- ''Wherein the nefarious plot is more complex than string theory.''

!!In-book Examples:

* ArsonMurderAndJaywalking: ''"The ranks of the would-be novelists are filled with Holocaust deniers, men who question whether women have souls, followers of Ayn Rand..."''
* BilingualBonus: Frequent jokes in foreign languages.
** In many of the examples, the characters offhandedly use foreign "expressions" that either make no sense in context, or even consitute commentary from the authors.
** In addition, see an example quoted twice on this page. "deus ex machina" is ''not'', in fact, French for "are you fucking kidding me?"
** ''Folie adieu'' is used to refer to a sudden ToneShift ShockingSwerve at the end, causing crippling MoodWhiplash that makes the novel unsellable. It is a GeniusBonus and BilingualBonus; it is a pun on a [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Folie_%C3%A0_deux folie a deux]], a "madness shared by two," and means, "Goodbye madness," not "are you [[BrickJoke FUCKING]] kidding me?"
* ChekhovsPun: "Hello, I am the [example]!", "The Second [example] in the Laundromat"
* ExactlyWhatItSaysOnTheTin: Read the title-- now guess what the book's about
* GeniusBonus / DidNotDoTheResearch: Their slam on ShownTheirWork throws in a whopper. The biologist mentions sexual reproduction's origin in algae 2.7 ''million'' years ago. That error is off by about three orders of magnitude - a factor of about a thousand. (To put that in perspective, it's like saying the distance between LA and New York is roughly three miles.) We certainly also don't have a common ancestor with algae at this time; any common ancestor between humans and algae would have lived long before this. Due to StylisticSuck, it's impossible to tell if the authors were sneaking in one more example of how important research is, including a little bonus, or failing biology harder than a Kansas school board while telling authors they cannot make afford to make such mistakes themselves.
* GoodNightSweetPrince: Used in a completely out of context shout out in one segment.
* HypocriticalHumor: The section advising against cliches ends with the line, "And in your heart of hearts, you know this is true." And then there's the gem, "This point is worth repeating: don't reiterate." See also StylisticSuck below.
* InWhichATropeIsDescribed: All the sub-headings of the examples have this or variations.
* {{Narm}}: Pretty much all of the bad writing examples are [[SoBadItsGood intentionally over-the-top bad]], but the [[http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/images/0061357952/sr=8-1/qid=1261999387/ref=dp_image_0?ie=UTF8&n=916520&s=books&qid=1261999387&sr=8-1 chunk of text on the cover]] takes the cake. [[invoked]]
* NoodleIncident: The "spaying incident" that is mentioned in a few segments.
* OverlyNarrowSuperlative: "I love you more than any woman that I've met on the Upper West Side in a really long time."
* PrecisionFStrike: "DeusExMachina" is cited as a French expression which means "Are you fucking kidding me?"
* RunningGag: In an AliceAndBob sort of way, they use several characters multiple times: Chip; Jack and Synthya; LeonardCohen; Joe and Melinda (especially Melinda), [[NamesToRunAwayFromReallyFast the evil Nefaro]], [[SantaClaus Santa]]... there are many, occasionally unrelated. In addition to those, we have the phrase "medium-sized breasts," misuse of the word "ironically," and several other small jokes that you wouldn't get if you started reading a random segment. That's not to mention the many, many one-off {{Call Back}}s and {{Call Forward}}s.
** And the eternal battle for ergo-hydraulics.
** Don't forget that at least two people in the samples own cats named Bartok.
** The leg of mutton. It was the only clue.
** The second [insert incident here] at the laundromat.
* ShapedLikeItself: ''The Sight Gag'' ([[spoiler: In which there is a sight gag.]])
* ShoutOut: They occasionally make random references, some named, some unnamed. These include HarryPotter, [[SouthPark the Underpants Gnomes]], A Child Called It, HAL, GoneWithTheWind, GravitysRainbow and so on.
* SoBadItsGood: Purposely invoked with the StylisticSuck segments.
* StylisticSuck: Every mistake comes with an (often quite humorous) excerpt of writing.
* {{Tradesnark}}: On using product names in fiction (Kmart Realism): "TM?"
* {{Tuckerization}}: Ever heard of the [[VinDiesel Marquis vin Diesel]]?

----

Top