Follow TV Tropes

Following

History InformedWrongness / LiveActionFilms

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Added example(s)

Added DiffLines:

* ''Film/TheBigShort'': While we're supposed to view Baum's group as just as amoral as the banks when the S&P officer calls him a hypocrite, it comes off as forced and looks more like a bad attempt at BlackAndGrayMorality since a) what the S&P group is doing is largely still illegal and borderline fraudulent, while what Baum is doing is actually very legal, if capitalistic; and b) Baum is betting against the banks, who are hardly innocent in this case, while S&P and the banks are largely screwing up a whole country and people that are largely ignorant of what's going on because they've been lied to about being able to refinance their debt (which they couldn't). Fundamentally, while the protagonists are making money off the financial crash, they haven't caused it or done anything to make it worse, in fact all they've done is what they're supposed to do - look at the facts, look at the data, and invest accordingly in their clients' best interests without lying or fabricating anything. If the banks or the ratings agencies had just done that, the crisis either wouldn't have happened or been a lot milder. And the protagonists do attempt to warn people, but either no one listens, or are deliberately ignoring (or even suppressing) the information to keep making money for as long as possible.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:


* In ''Film/CasinoRoyale2006'', a major low point in the narrative comes when Bond falls for Le Chiffre's double-bluff: in a crucial poker game, Le Chiffre turns out to have been faking his tell, causing Bond to go all-in when he thought Le Chiffre was bluffing. This is treated as a moment of idiocy and recklessness on his part, and his superiors chew him out for betting everything like that and needing to borrow more money to get back in the game. The thing is, on the hand Bond went all-in on, he was holding an ace and a king, giving a full house of kings over aces--this is one of the strongest hands in poker, with over a 99% chance of winning in that situation, and ''any'' poker player would go all-in on it, regardless of what they thought their opponent had. In fact, there are only two hands Le Chiffre could have held that would have beaten it: two aces (which would have given him a stronger full house), and the hand he was holding, two jacks (which netted him four-of-a-kind). Essentially, bluff or not, Bond had every reason to think he was about to win the hand, and the reason he lost has less to do with recklessness and more to do with the MagicPokerEquation.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''Film/{{Gordy}}'': Sipes' protests to Mr. Royce's promotion of Gordy over his daughter after the test shoots, as well as his later objection to the man leaving his company to Gordy in his will. Mr. Sipes may be a scheming and dishonest corporate executive, but he is quite in the right to be saying the public's newfound fixation on Gordy is simply ridiculous, and to protest the very notion of leaving an entire company in the care of a '''pig''' as opposed to the man's own adult daughter.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** ''Film/TheLastJedi'', Poe Dameron repeatedly demands that Admiral Holdo do ''something'' instead of just apparently delaying the inevitable by continuing to run from the Empire. In response, Holdo will only insists that he follow his orders without question, [[LockedOutOfTheLoop refusing to reveal]] the plan that she actually does have. Leia later supports Holdo's behavior and criticizes Poe for trying to be a hero. Many fans feel that the movie treating Poe as wrong doesn't make sense, since he and the rest of the crew were purposely kept in the dark during a situation where they needed to know something was being done to save themselves, which Holdo refused to do. Worse, he actually agreed with the plan once he was told, meaning if Holdo had just told him, Poe likely would have simply followed along without issue. Within the context of the situation, Poe acted with the best intentions to save the crew from what he saw as a cowardly leader who was doing nothing to save the Resistance, but is treated as wrong for not just blindly following the orders of a superior who had given him no reason to think was doing anything to save them.

to:

** ''Film/TheLastJedi'', Poe Dameron repeatedly demands that Admiral Holdo do ''something'' instead of just apparently delaying the inevitable by continuing to run from the Empire.First Order. In response, Holdo will only insists that he follow his orders without question, [[LockedOutOfTheLoop refusing to reveal]] the plan that she actually does have. Leia later supports Holdo's behavior and criticizes Poe for trying to be a hero. Many fans feel that the movie treating Poe as wrong doesn't make sense, since he and the rest of the crew were purposely kept in the dark during a situation where they needed to know something was being done to save themselves, which Holdo refused to do. Worse, he actually agreed with the plan once he was told, meaning if Holdo had just told him, Poe likely would have simply followed along without issue. Within the context of the situation, Poe acted with the best intentions to save the crew from what he saw as a cowardly leader who was doing nothing to save the Resistance, but is treated as wrong for not just blindly following the orders of a superior who had given him no reason to think was doing anything to save them.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* In ''Film/FlightCrew'', Gushchin views his failure to save the refugees as an enormous mistake of his where he allowed himself to be overruled by his superior Zinchenko, and the narrative apparently agrees with him. However, the unnamed country in question has just been through a violent coup, with armed soldiers who, as the film itself shows, don't hesitate to kill civilians, occupying the airport as well, while all Zinchenko and Gushchin have is a civilian plane. To a viewer, they pick the LesserOfTwoEvils option of a SadisticChoice: comply with the new authorities' demands and only take foreign citizens on board (thereby at least saving ''them''), or intervene, try to take the local passengers as well — and get shot down without saving anyone.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''Film/ChristmasWithACapitalC'': All the people who make the reasonable points of opening up the public space for a more diverse holiday display are quickly shot down by Dan, who simply says that "it doesn't work with him".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Film/BlackChristmas2006'': TheReveal that Kyle has a sex tape online is treated as some horrendous character flaw on his part. The video was stolen and uploaded to the video without his consent, and yet the sorority sisters treat him as an AssholeVictim because their friend Megan was in it. Said tape was made ''before'' he got with Kelli and he admits he isn't proud of it, making it understandable why he might not have told her yet; especially since it was only put on the internet that day. With regards to Megan, it's never elaborated if she knew she was being filmed, but the angle on the camera indicates that she did - implying it was a sex tape between two consenting adults. Kyle is a victim of revenge porn, and yet the whole thing is treated as his fault.

to:

* ''Film/BlackChristmas2006'': TheReveal that Kyle has a sex tape online is treated as some horrendous character flaw on his part. The video was stolen and uploaded to the video internet without his consent, and yet the sorority sisters treat him as an AssholeVictim because their friend Megan was in it. Said tape was made ''before'' he got with Kelli and he admits he isn't proud of it, making it understandable why he might not have told her yet; especially since it was only put on the internet that day. With regards to Megan, it's never elaborated if she knew she was being filmed, but the angle on the camera indicates that she did - implying it was a sex tape between two consenting adults. Kyle is a victim of revenge porn, and yet the whole thing is treated as his fault.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* In ''Film/TheShack'', the film is about a man named Mackenzie whose daughter gets murdered by a serial killer on a camping trip, and he returns to the shack only to be brought in by three people who help him forgive the killer. The film's message of forgiving all wrong, including a ''serial killer'' who ''murdered your child'' falls rather flat since [[KarmaHoudini the killer got away with his crime]] and it is understandable why Mackenzie should continue feeling devastated and determined to get justice.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''Film/ProblemChild'': Junior and his victims have reasons for hating one another. But while Junior is called out for his behavior, nobody calls out his aggressors for their behavior and treats Junior's attacks as totally one-sided.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Elmo's attachment to his blanket in ''Film/TheAdventuresOfElmoInGrouchland'' is presented as him being greedy, as well as him refusing to share it with anyone else. However, Elmo having an attachment towards his blanket comes off as less of him being greedy and more as him being a child attached to a security blanket, which is perfectly normal for a child and not wanting to lose it or have it damaged by someone is also understandable. And Elmo did allow Zoe to hold his blanket for a couple of seconds, but Zoe's refusal to give back something that's not her belonging and getting into a tug of war over the blanket with Elmo, resulting in Elmo losing it, makes Zoe come off as more of the one being greedy instead of Elmo. [[note]] A Season 50 episode from ''Series/SesameStreet'' rectifies this issue when Rudy takes Julia's stuffed bunny to play with. Julia doesn't take too kindly to it and begins throwing a tantrum. Alan explains to Rudy that Julia's bunny is a comfort item that helps her when she's scared or in a bad mood, so it's not for sharing. Rudy understands and apologizes for taking Julia's toy. [[/note]]

to:

* Elmo's attachment to his blanket in ''Film/TheAdventuresOfElmoInGrouchland'' is presented as him being greedy, greedy as well as him refusing to share it with anyone else. However, Elmo having an Elmo's attachment towards to his blanket comes off as less of as him being greedy and more as him being a child attached to a security blanket, which is perfectly normal for a child child, and not wanting to lose it or have it damaged by someone is also understandable. And Elmo did allow Zoe to hold his blanket for a couple of seconds, but Zoe's refusal to give back something that's not her belonging hers and getting into a tug of war over the blanket with Elmo, resulting in Elmo losing it, makes Zoe come off as more of the one being greedy instead of Elmo. [[note]] A Season 50 episode from ''Series/SesameStreet'' rectifies this issue when Rudy takes Julia's stuffed bunny to play with. Julia doesn't take too kindly to it and begins throwing a tantrum. Alan explains to Rudy that Julia's bunny is a comfort item that helps her when she's scared or in a bad mood, so it's not for sharing. Rudy understands and apologizes for taking Julia's toy. [[/note]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
It was clear in the original release that Boba Fett followed them to Cloud City.


** Han Solo is repeatedly portrayed as being in the wrong for wanting to leave to pay off his debt to Jabba the Hutt in ''Film/TheEmpireStrikesBack''. Nobody (except [[ReasonableAuthorityFigure General Riekann]]) acknowledges that he is a dead man if he doesn't pay it back, or that he's actively being hunted by bounty hunters who have already attempted to kill him in Mos Eisley ''and'' on Ord Mantell by the time the ''second film'' has started. Even when Han points out his concerns that the bounty hunters won't stop hunting him until he pays off his debt, he's nevertheless dismissed as if he's just turning his back on the Rebellion's cause, and the possibility of [[TakeAThirdOption leaving, paying his debt, and coming back]] is never brought up either, even though this would probably take only a day at most. This is made even worse in the remastered versions where it's shown that Boba Fett was the one to track them to Cloud City which resulted in Luke's near death and Han being captured, as Fett's motivation for chasing them in the first place was to collect the bounty on Han's head.

to:

** Han Solo is repeatedly portrayed as being in the wrong for wanting to leave to pay off his debt to Jabba the Hutt in ''Film/TheEmpireStrikesBack''. Nobody (except [[ReasonableAuthorityFigure General Riekann]]) acknowledges that he is a dead man if he doesn't pay it back, or that he's actively being hunted by bounty hunters who have already attempted to kill him in Mos Eisley ''and'' on Ord Mantell by the time the ''second film'' has started. Even when Han points out his concerns that the bounty hunters won't stop hunting him until he pays off his debt, he's nevertheless dismissed as if he's just turning his back on the Rebellion's cause, and the possibility of [[TakeAThirdOption leaving, paying his debt, and coming back]] is never brought up either, even though this would probably take only a day at most. This In fact it is made even worse in the remastered versions where it's shown that Boba Fett was who manages to follow the one to track them ''Falcon'' to Cloud City which resulted in Luke's near death and City, so not paying the debt off lead directly to Han being captured, as Fett's motivation for chasing them in the first place was to collect the bounty on Han's head.captured and frozen.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''Film/TheViolentYears'': The parents are touted as being neglectful of Paula, but their behavior on screen seems to belie Paula (and the writer's) claims of them.
** While the mother is fairly aloof, she does give Paula blank checks, and free use of her car, without qualifications. She is claimed to never be interested in Paula, but she actually does show concern for Paula's desires, and has a long conversation with her.
** Similarly, her father is portrayed as being married to his job and never being home for Paula. Yet, her father did give her gifts, and even more importantly, is ''supportive and knowledgeable'' of Paula's school and civic activities. To take that even further, he's actively proud of her.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
The adjusted version read like a Misaimed Fanbase, not Informed Wrongness. It needed to be trimmed down for sure, but the newer entry is not why people have an issue with the way it is handled.


** ''Film/TheLastJedi'', Poe Dameron repeatedly demands that Admiral Holdo do ''something'' instead of just apparently delaying the inevitable by continuing to run from the Empire. In response, Holdo will only insists that he follow his orders without question, [[LockedOutOfTheLoop refusing to reveal]] the plan that she actually does have. Leia later supports Holdo's behavior and criticizes Poe for trying to be a hero. While it is a BrokenBase, many fans feel that Poe's mutiny should be blamed on Holdo and Leia's [[PoorCommunicationKills poor communication]] rather than any deficiency of character on Poe's part.

to:

** ''Film/TheLastJedi'', Poe Dameron repeatedly demands that Admiral Holdo do ''something'' instead of just apparently delaying the inevitable by continuing to run from the Empire. In response, Holdo will only insists that he follow his orders without question, [[LockedOutOfTheLoop refusing to reveal]] the plan that she actually does have. Leia later supports Holdo's behavior and criticizes Poe for trying to be a hero. While it is a BrokenBase, many Many fans feel that Poe's mutiny should be blamed on the movie treating Poe as wrong doesn't make sense, since he and the rest of the crew were purposely kept in the dark during a situation where they needed to know something was being done to save themselves, which Holdo and Leia's [[PoorCommunicationKills poor communication]] rather than any deficiency refused to do. Worse, he actually agreed with the plan once he was told, meaning if Holdo had just told him, Poe likely would have simply followed along without issue. Within the context of character on Poe's part.the situation, Poe acted with the best intentions to save the crew from what he saw as a cowardly leader who was doing nothing to save the Resistance, but is treated as wrong for not just blindly following the orders of a superior who had given him no reason to think was doing anything to save them.

Changed: 2525

Removed: 1680

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Moving to discussion


** Even before that, the conflict between Poe and Leia/Holdo is sparked by Poe's decisions in battle. He engages in what seems to be a diversion maneuver to buy the rest of the Resistance time to escape from a besieged base. Then he decides that while they're at it, they might as well try to make the First Order pay for the base they destroyed and take out their dreadnaught. He succeeds, disobeying Leia's order to disengage and sacrificing a dozen bombers in the process. Leia/Holdo immediately jump all over his case, calling him too violent and too hot-headed, with Leia even demoting him as punishment. The problem is that neither coherently explain what exactly he did wrong by doing so. They don't mention any plans involving the lost bombers that he might've thwarted, they don't deny that the dreadnaught was "a fleet killer" that could have killed them right away, they don't accuse him of botching or even threatening the evacuation, and neither did his actions have anything to do with the First Order's ability to track the Rebels through hyperspace (like, if he inadvertently bought the enemy the precious seconds they needed to lock onto the flagship). Yes, there was the issue of casualties, but, callous as it might sound, they were in a war, heavy casualties had always been the staple of Rebel operations against the Empire in the previous movies, and also it looks really weird for a general and an admiral to suddenly be this torn up and indignant about the loss of a couple dozen people, when literally none of the rank-and-file ever raises this issue. The only character shown to have any issues with it outside of Leia and Holdo is Rose, on account of her sister dying in it, but she never even remotely brings up having any issues with Poe and is willing to help him with a plan to save the Resistance. Between all those factors, it makes it seem like Poe is wrong for making a risky but ultimately successful attack that saved everyone's lives.
* In ''Film/{{Surrogates}}'' -- and, for that matter, almost every movie which uses virtual reality to deliver an AntiEscapismAesop -- it's taken as a given that using artificial means to lead exactly the kind of life you want is inherently morally inferior to actually going out and leading your own boring life. Even though the users feel and experience everything their surrogates do (so it feels just as real as doing it in person except you won't die if, say, your parachute doesn't open), and actually are interacting with other people (they just don't see what they really look like), and the movie tells us in the opening that the use of Surrogates has ''almost completely wiped out racism and sexism.'' Not only that, but it was stated that the titular surrogates were initially developed to help people with disabilities, letting them do things they couldn't do with their organic bodies. To imply that they ought to give that up because it isn't "real" would be [[InspirationallyDisadvantaged SEVERELY patronizing]]. And if that's not enough, ''they had no murders for over a decade'' in the city of the film. Yeah, but... it's not ''real'', man! To really hammer home the informed wrongness, ''WesternAnimation/SpicyCity'' has an episode called "Love is a Download" with an almost identical concept to Surrogates, except it is shown as a happy ending when the two main characters, a victim of domestic abuse driven to suicide from always being treated as a sex object due to her looks and a hideously ugly computer technician who's been alone his whole life because of his looks, find love within the virtual world [[TrueBeautyIsOnTheInside where looks don't matter]].

to:

** Even before that, the conflict between Poe and Leia/Holdo is sparked by Poe's decisions in battle. He engages in what seems to be a diversion maneuver to buy the rest of the Resistance time to escape from a besieged base. Then he decides that while they're at it, they might as well try to make the First Order pay for the base they destroyed and take out their dreadnaught. He succeeds, disobeying Leia's order to disengage and sacrificing a dozen bombers in the process. Leia/Holdo immediately jump all over his case, calling him too violent and too hot-headed, with Leia even demoting him as punishment. The problem is that neither coherently explain what exactly he did wrong by doing so. They don't mention any plans involving the lost bombers that he might've thwarted, they don't deny that the dreadnaught was "a fleet killer" that could have killed them right away, they don't accuse him of botching or even threatening the evacuation, and neither did his actions have anything to do with the First Order's ability to track the Rebels through hyperspace (like, if he inadvertently bought the enemy the precious seconds they needed to lock onto the flagship). Yes, there was the issue of casualties, but, callous as it might sound, they were in a war, heavy casualties had always been the staple of Rebel operations against the Empire in the previous movies, and also it looks really weird for a general and an admiral to suddenly be this torn up and indignant about the loss of a couple dozen people, when literally none of the rank-and-file ever raises this issue. The only character shown to have any issues with it outside of Leia and Holdo is Rose, on account of her sister dying in it, but she never even remotely brings up having any issues with Poe and is willing to help him with a plan to save the Resistance. Between all those factors, it makes it seem like Poe is wrong for making a risky but ultimately successful attack that saved everyone's lives.
* In ''Film/{{Surrogates}}'' -- and, for that matter, almost every movie which uses virtual reality to deliver an AntiEscapismAesop -- it's taken as a given that using artificial means to lead exactly the kind of life you want is inherently morally inferior to actually going out and leading your own boring life. Even though the users feel and experience everything their surrogates do (so it feels just as real as doing it in person except you won't die if, say, your parachute doesn't open), and actually are interacting with other people (they just don't see what they really look like), and the movie tells us in the opening that the use of Surrogates has ''almost completely wiped out racism and sexism.'' Not only that, but it was stated that the titular surrogates were initially developed to help people with disabilities, letting them do things they couldn't do with their organic bodies. To imply that they ought to give that up because it isn't "real" would be [[InspirationallyDisadvantaged SEVERELY patronizing]]. And if that's not enough, ''they had no murders for over a decade'' in the city of the film. Yeah, but... it's not ''real'', man! To really hammer home the informed wrongness, ''WesternAnimation/SpicyCity'' has an episode called "Love is a Download" with an almost identical concept to Surrogates, except it is shown as a happy ending when the two main characters, a victim of domestic abuse driven to suicide from always being treated as a sex object due to her looks and a hideously ugly computer technician who's been alone his whole life because of his looks, find love within the virtual world [[TrueBeautyIsOnTheInside where looks don't matter]].man!
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Trying to trim down this wall of text


** Likewise in ''Film/TheLastJedi'', Leia admonishes Poe Dameron for trying to act like a hero, saying that Admiral Holdo was truly doing something heroic through subtle action. While it is a BrokenBase, many fans agree with Poe and feel that his actions were just, as [[LockedOutOfTheLoop he had no way of knowing any better as Holdo withheld crucial information from the crew]], and that Holdo made no attempt whatsoever to even ''imply'' to her men that she had any kind of plan whatsoever and that she wasn't just running scared. Also, Holdo's churlish and childish obsession with taking Poe down a peg did nothing to inspire confidence or diffuse the situation, and is what actually pushed Poe from being reasonable and wanting to work with her to deciding that she was just running scared, and thus that a mutiny was their only hope for survival-- in fact he actually ''liked'' her plan once Leia explained it to him, thus he would have been wholly supportive had she just explained herself, [[NotWhatItLooksLike especially when her lack of an explanation was actively making it look like she was preparing to use everyone else as bait so she could escape with her command crew]]. Furthermore, [[PoorCommunicationKills the majority of Resistance members on the ship willingly disobeyed orders and sided with Poe because they were also kept in the dark about Holdo's plan, but this was never addressed]]. Pretty much the only thing that fans seem to agree on about this is that Poe's actions were ''illegal'', but with a lot of fans this counts for very little in a series where resisting the oppressive rule of an Empire and their evil laws is a central theme (not to mention that things in history like the UndergroundRailroad were illegal, yet undoubtedly in the right in spite of it).

to:

** Likewise in ''Film/TheLastJedi'', Leia admonishes Poe Dameron for trying to act like a hero, saying repeatedly demands that Admiral Holdo was truly doing something heroic through subtle action. do ''something'' instead of just apparently delaying the inevitable by continuing to run from the Empire. In response, Holdo will only insists that he follow his orders without question, [[LockedOutOfTheLoop refusing to reveal]] the plan that she actually does have. Leia later supports Holdo's behavior and criticizes Poe for trying to be a hero. While it is a BrokenBase, many fans agree with Poe and feel that his actions were just, as [[LockedOutOfTheLoop he had no way of knowing any better as Holdo withheld crucial information from the crew]], and that Holdo made no attempt whatsoever to even ''imply'' to her men that she had any kind of plan whatsoever and that she wasn't just running scared. Also, Holdo's churlish and childish obsession with taking Poe down a peg did nothing to inspire confidence or diffuse the situation, and is what actually pushed Poe from being reasonable and wanting to work with her to deciding that she was just running scared, and thus that a Poe's mutiny was their only hope for survival-- in fact he actually ''liked'' her plan once Leia explained it to him, thus he would have been wholly supportive had she just explained herself, [[NotWhatItLooksLike especially when her lack of an explanation was actively making it look like she was preparing to use everyone else as bait so she could escape with her command crew]]. Furthermore, should be blamed on Holdo and Leia's [[PoorCommunicationKills the majority poor communication]] rather than any deficiency of Resistance members character on the ship willingly disobeyed orders and sided with Poe because they were also kept in the dark about Holdo's plan, but this was never addressed]]. Pretty much the only thing that fans seem to agree on about this is that Poe's actions were ''illegal'', but with a lot of fans this counts for very little in a series where resisting the oppressive rule of an Empire and their evil laws is a central theme (not to mention that things in history like the UndergroundRailroad were illegal, yet undoubtedly in the right in spite of it).part.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Likewise in ''Film/TheLastJedi'', Leia admonishes Poe Dameron for trying to act like a hero, saying that Admiral Holdo was truly doing something heroic through subtle action. While it is a BrokenBase, many fans agree with Poe and feel that his actions were just, as [[LockedOutOfTheLoop he had no way of knowing any better as Holdo withheld crucial information from the crew]], and that Holdo made no attempt whatsoever to even ''imply'' to her men that she had any kind of plan whatsoever and that she wasn't just running scared. Also, Holdo's churlish and childish obsession with taking Poe down a peg did nothing to inspire confidence or diffuse the situation, and is what actually pushed Poe from being reasonable and wanting to work with her to deciding that she was just running scared, and thus that a mutiny was their only hope for survival-- in fact he actually ''liked'' her plan once Leia explained it to him, thus he would have been wholly supportive had she just explained herself. Furthermore, [[PoorCommunicationKills the majority of Resistance members on the ship willingly disobeyed orders and sided with Poe because they were also kept in the dark about Holdo's plan, but this was never addressed]]. Pretty much the only thing that fans seem to agree on about this is that Poe's actions were ''illegal'', but with a lot of fans this counts for very little in a series where resisting the oppressive rule of an Empire and their evil laws is a central theme (not to mention that things in history like the UndergroundRailroad were illegal, yet undoubtedly in the right in spite of it).

to:

** Likewise in ''Film/TheLastJedi'', Leia admonishes Poe Dameron for trying to act like a hero, saying that Admiral Holdo was truly doing something heroic through subtle action. While it is a BrokenBase, many fans agree with Poe and feel that his actions were just, as [[LockedOutOfTheLoop he had no way of knowing any better as Holdo withheld crucial information from the crew]], and that Holdo made no attempt whatsoever to even ''imply'' to her men that she had any kind of plan whatsoever and that she wasn't just running scared. Also, Holdo's churlish and childish obsession with taking Poe down a peg did nothing to inspire confidence or diffuse the situation, and is what actually pushed Poe from being reasonable and wanting to work with her to deciding that she was just running scared, and thus that a mutiny was their only hope for survival-- in fact he actually ''liked'' her plan once Leia explained it to him, thus he would have been wholly supportive had she just explained herself.herself, [[NotWhatItLooksLike especially when her lack of an explanation was actively making it look like she was preparing to use everyone else as bait so she could escape with her command crew]]. Furthermore, [[PoorCommunicationKills the majority of Resistance members on the ship willingly disobeyed orders and sided with Poe because they were also kept in the dark about Holdo's plan, but this was never addressed]]. Pretty much the only thing that fans seem to agree on about this is that Poe's actions were ''illegal'', but with a lot of fans this counts for very little in a series where resisting the oppressive rule of an Empire and their evil laws is a central theme (not to mention that things in history like the UndergroundRailroad were illegal, yet undoubtedly in the right in spite of it).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** ''Film/TheAvengers2012'': The titular group gives Nick Fury hell and a half for SHIELD using the Tesseract and recovered HYDRA technology to make weapons of their own, which Fury justifies because humanity is ''hopelessly'' outmatched by the likes of Asgardians and otherworldly threats. Nothing is said of the simple fact that Fury is ''absolutely right'', especially considering that humanity's only other hope, the titular Avengers, are currently a ragtag unreliable group at best, and if they fail to come together or are otherwise defeated, humanity will be completely helpless. The criticisms also ring very hollow coming from Iron Man (who relies on making weapons like SHIELD is doing) and Captain America (who was created by the predecessors of SHIELD through a scientist rescued from HYDRA).

to:

** ''Film/TheAvengers2012'': The titular group gives Nick Fury hell and a half for SHIELD using the Tesseract and recovered HYDRA technology to make weapons of their own, which Fury justifies because humanity is ''hopelessly'' outmatched by the likes of Asgardians and otherworldly threats. Nothing is said of the simple fact that Fury is ''absolutely right'', especially considering that humanity's only other hope, the titular Avengers, are currently a ragtag unreliable group at best, and if they fail to come together or are otherwise defeated, humanity will be completely helpless. The criticisms also ring very hollow coming from Iron Man (who relies on making weapons like SHIELD is doing) and Captain America (who was created by the predecessors of SHIELD through a scientist rescued from HYDRA).HYDRA, using a serum ''he developed for HYDRA'').
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** ''Film/TheAvengers2012'': The titular group gives Nick Fury hell and a half for SHIELD using the Tesseract and recovered HYDRA technology to make weapons of their own, which Fury justifies because humanity is ''hopelessly'' outmatched by the likes of Asgardians and otherworldly threats. Nothing is said of the simple fact that Fury is ''absolutely right'', especially considering humanity's only other hope, the titular Avengers, are currently a ragtag unreliable group at best and that if they fail to come together or are otherwise defeated humanity will be completely helpless. The criticisms also ring very hollow coming from Iron Man and Captain America, the former who relies on making weapons like SHIELD is doing and the latter who was created by the predecessors of SHIELD through a scientist rescued from HYDRA.

to:

** ''Film/TheAvengers2012'': The titular group gives Nick Fury hell and a half for SHIELD using the Tesseract and recovered HYDRA technology to make weapons of their own, which Fury justifies because humanity is ''hopelessly'' outmatched by the likes of Asgardians and otherworldly threats. Nothing is said of the simple fact that Fury is ''absolutely right'', especially considering that humanity's only other hope, the titular Avengers, are currently a ragtag unreliable group at best best, and that if they fail to come together or are otherwise defeated defeated, humanity will be completely helpless. The criticisms also ring very hollow coming from Iron Man and Captain America, the former who (who relies on making weapons like SHIELD is doing doing) and the latter who Captain America (who was created by the predecessors of SHIELD through a scientist rescued from HYDRA.HYDRA).



* In ''Film/{{Showgirls}}'', the main character [[MeaningfulName Nomi]] works in a strip club and aspires to be a topless dancer in a Las Vegas show. At one point she gives a man a lapdance that amounts to sex with a denim condom, she was perfectly willing to do what came down to live, on-stage lesbian sex, screwing her boss to get a higher position, and pushing the lead dancer down the stairs to get her job, but when she's asked during an audition to use ice cubes to make herself more ''*ahem*'' "perky", her angry refusal is treated as a display of strength of character. Why the line of moral compromise is drawn at that exact point is perhaps the only thing the movie leaves to the viewer's imagination. Furthermore, her later use of ice cubes after she joins Goddess is intended to be a sign that she's "losing herself."

to:

* In ''Film/{{Showgirls}}'', the main character [[MeaningfulName Nomi]] works in a strip club and aspires to be a topless dancer in a Las Vegas show. At one point she gives a man a lapdance that amounts to sex with a denim condom, and she was perfectly willing to do what came down to live, live on-stage lesbian sex, screwing screw her boss to get a higher position, and pushing push the lead dancer down the stairs to get her job, but when she's asked during an audition to use ice cubes to make herself more ''*ahem*'' "perky", her angry refusal is treated as a display of strength of character. Why the line of moral compromise is drawn at that exact point is perhaps the only thing the movie leaves to the viewer's imagination. Furthermore, her later use of ice cubes after she joins Goddess is intended to be a sign that she's "losing herself."



** Han Solo is repeatedly portrayed as being in the wrong for wanting to leave to pay off his debt to Jabba the Hutt in ''Film/TheEmpireStrikesBack''. Nobody (except [[ReasonableAuthorityFigure General Riekann]]) acknowledges that he is a dead man if he doesn't pay it back, or that he's actively being hunted by bounty hunters who have already attempted to kill him in Mos Eisley ''and'' on Ord Mantell by the time the ''second film'' has started. Even when Han points out his concerns that the bounty hunters won't stop hunting him until he pays off his debt he's nevertheless dismissed as if he's just turning his back on the Rebellion's cause, and the possibility of [[TakeAThirdOption leaving, paying his debt, and coming back]] is never brought up either even though this would probably take only a day at most. This is made even worse in the remastered versions where it's shown Boba Fett was the one to track them to Cloud City which resulted in Luke's near death and Han being captured, as Fett's motivation for chasing them in the first place was to collect the bounty on Han's head.
** Likewise in ''Film/TheLastJedi'', Leia admonishes Poe Dameron for trying to act like a hero, saying that Admiral Holdo was truly doing something heroic through subtle action. While it is a BrokenBase, many fans agree with Poe and that his actions were just as [[LockedOutOfTheLoop he had no way of knowing any better as Holdo withheld crucial information from the crew]], and that Holdo made no attempt whatsoever to even ''imply'' to her men that she had any kind of plan whatsoever and that she wasn't just running scared. Also, Holdo's churlish and childish obsession with taking Poe down a peg did nothing to inspire confidence or diffuse the situation, and is what actually pushed Poe from being reasonable and wanting to work with her to deciding she was just running scared and thus that a mutiny was their only hope for survival -- in fact he actually ''liked'' her plan once Leia explained it to him, thus he would have been wholly supportive had she just explained herself. Furthermore, [[PoorCommunicationKills the majority of Resistance members on the ship willingly disobeyed orders and sided with Poe because they were also kept in the dark about Holdo's plan but this was never addressed]]. Pretty much the only thing fans seem to agree on about this is that Poe's actions were ''illegal'', but with a lot of fans this counts for very little in a series where resisting the oppressive rule of an Empire and their evil laws is a central theme (not to mention, things in history like the UndergroundRailroad were illegal and undoubtedly in the right in spite of it).
** Even before that, the conflict between Poe and Leia/Holdo is sparked by Poe's decisions in battle. He engages in what seems to be a diversion maneuver to buy the rest of the Resistance time to escape from a besieged base. Then he decides that while they're at it, they might as well try to make the First Order pay for the base they destroyed and take out their dreadnaught. He succeeds, disobeying Leia's order to disengage and sacrificing a dozen bombers in the process. Leia/Holdo immediately jump all over his case, calling him too violent and too hot-headed, with Leia even demoting him as punishment. The problem is that neither coherently explain what exactly he did wrong by doing so. They don't mention any plans involving the lost bombers he might've thwarted, they don't deny that the dreadnaught was "a fleet killer" that could have killed them right away, they don't accuse him of botching, or even threatening, the evacuation, and neither did his actions have anything to do with First Order's ability to track the Rebels through hyperspace (like, if he inadvertently bought the enemy the precious seconds they needed to lock onto the flagship). Yes, there was the issue of casualties, but, callous as it might sound, they were in a war, heavy casualties had always been the staple of Rebel operations against the Empire in the previous movies, and also it looks really weird for a general and an admiral to suddenly be this torn up and indignant about the loss of a couple dozen people, when literally none of the rank-and-file ever raises this issue. The only character shown to have any issues with it outside of Leia and Holdo is Rose, on account of her sister dying in it, but she never even remotely brings up having any issues with Poe and is willing to help him with a plan to save the Resistance. Between all those factors, it makes it seem like Poe is wrong for making a risky but ultimately successful attack that saved everyone's lives.

to:

** Han Solo is repeatedly portrayed as being in the wrong for wanting to leave to pay off his debt to Jabba the Hutt in ''Film/TheEmpireStrikesBack''. Nobody (except [[ReasonableAuthorityFigure General Riekann]]) acknowledges that he is a dead man if he doesn't pay it back, or that he's actively being hunted by bounty hunters who have already attempted to kill him in Mos Eisley ''and'' on Ord Mantell by the time the ''second film'' has started. Even when Han points out his concerns that the bounty hunters won't stop hunting him until he pays off his debt debt, he's nevertheless dismissed as if he's just turning his back on the Rebellion's cause, and the possibility of [[TakeAThirdOption leaving, paying his debt, and coming back]] is never brought up either either, even though this would probably take only a day at most. This is made even worse in the remastered versions where it's shown that Boba Fett was the one to track them to Cloud City which resulted in Luke's near death and Han being captured, as Fett's motivation for chasing them in the first place was to collect the bounty on Han's head.
** Likewise in ''Film/TheLastJedi'', Leia admonishes Poe Dameron for trying to act like a hero, saying that Admiral Holdo was truly doing something heroic through subtle action. While it is a BrokenBase, many fans agree with Poe and feel that his actions were just just, as [[LockedOutOfTheLoop he had no way of knowing any better as Holdo withheld crucial information from the crew]], and that Holdo made no attempt whatsoever to even ''imply'' to her men that she had any kind of plan whatsoever and that she wasn't just running scared. Also, Holdo's churlish and childish obsession with taking Poe down a peg did nothing to inspire confidence or diffuse the situation, and is what actually pushed Poe from being reasonable and wanting to work with her to deciding that she was just running scared scared, and thus that a mutiny was their only hope for survival -- survival-- in fact he actually ''liked'' her plan once Leia explained it to him, thus he would have been wholly supportive had she just explained herself. Furthermore, [[PoorCommunicationKills the majority of Resistance members on the ship willingly disobeyed orders and sided with Poe because they were also kept in the dark about Holdo's plan plan, but this was never addressed]]. Pretty much the only thing that fans seem to agree on about this is that Poe's actions were ''illegal'', but with a lot of fans this counts for very little in a series where resisting the oppressive rule of an Empire and their evil laws is a central theme (not to mention, mention that things in history like the UndergroundRailroad were illegal and illegal, yet undoubtedly in the right in spite of it).
** Even before that, the conflict between Poe and Leia/Holdo is sparked by Poe's decisions in battle. He engages in what seems to be a diversion maneuver to buy the rest of the Resistance time to escape from a besieged base. Then he decides that while they're at it, they might as well try to make the First Order pay for the base they destroyed and take out their dreadnaught. He succeeds, disobeying Leia's order to disengage and sacrificing a dozen bombers in the process. Leia/Holdo immediately jump all over his case, calling him too violent and too hot-headed, with Leia even demoting him as punishment. The problem is that neither coherently explain what exactly he did wrong by doing so. They don't mention any plans involving the lost bombers that he might've thwarted, they don't deny that the dreadnaught was "a fleet killer" that could have killed them right away, they don't accuse him of botching, botching or even threatening, threatening the evacuation, and neither did his actions have anything to do with the First Order's ability to track the Rebels through hyperspace (like, if he inadvertently bought the enemy the precious seconds they needed to lock onto the flagship). Yes, there was the issue of casualties, but, callous as it might sound, they were in a war, heavy casualties had always been the staple of Rebel operations against the Empire in the previous movies, and also it looks really weird for a general and an admiral to suddenly be this torn up and indignant about the loss of a couple dozen people, when literally none of the rank-and-file ever raises this issue. The only character shown to have any issues with it outside of Leia and Holdo is Rose, on account of her sister dying in it, but she never even remotely brings up having any issues with Poe and is willing to help him with a plan to save the Resistance. Between all those factors, it makes it seem like Poe is wrong for making a risky but ultimately successful attack that saved everyone's lives.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Elmo's attachment to his blanket in ''Film/TheAdventuresOfElmoInGrouchland'' is presented as him being greedy, as well as him refusing to share it with anyone else. However, Elmo having an attachment towards his blanket comes off as less of him being greedy and more as him being a child attached to a security blanket, which is perfectly normal for a child and not wanting to lose it or have it damaged by someone is also understandable. And Elmo did allow Zoe to hold his blanket for a couple of seconds, but Zoe's refusal to give back something that's not her belonging, getting into a tug of war over the blanket with Elmo, and resulting in Elmo losing it makes Zoe come off as more of the one being greedy instead of Elmo. [[note]] A Season 50 episode from ''Series/SesameStreet'' rectifies this issue when Rudy takes Julia's stuffed bunny to play with. Julia doesn't take too kindly to it and begins throwing a tantrum. Alan explains to Rudy that Julia's bunny is a comfort item that helps her when she's scared or in a bad mood, so it's not for sharing. Rudy understands and apologizes for taking Julia's toy. [[/note]]

to:

* Elmo's attachment to his blanket in ''Film/TheAdventuresOfElmoInGrouchland'' is presented as him being greedy, as well as him refusing to share it with anyone else. However, Elmo having an attachment towards his blanket comes off as less of him being greedy and more as him being a child attached to a security blanket, which is perfectly normal for a child and not wanting to lose it or have it damaged by someone is also understandable. And Elmo did allow Zoe to hold his blanket for a couple of seconds, but Zoe's refusal to give back something that's not her belonging, belonging and getting into a tug of war over the blanket with Elmo, and resulting in Elmo losing it it, makes Zoe come off as more of the one being greedy instead of Elmo. [[note]] A Season 50 episode from ''Series/SesameStreet'' rectifies this issue when Rudy takes Julia's stuffed bunny to play with. Julia doesn't take too kindly to it and begins throwing a tantrum. Alan explains to Rudy that Julia's bunny is a comfort item that helps her when she's scared or in a bad mood, so it's not for sharing. Rudy understands and apologizes for taking Julia's toy. [[/note]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Even before that, the conflict between Poe and Leia/Holdo is sparked by Poe's decisions in battle. He engages in what seems to be a diversion maneuver to buy the rest of the Resistance time to escape from a besieged base. Then he decides that while they're at it, they might as well try to make the First Order pay for the base they destroyed and take out their dreadnaught. He succeeds, disobeying Leia's order to disengage and sacrificing a dozen bombers in the process. Leia/Holdo immediately jump all over his case, calling him too violent and too hot-headed, with Leia even demoting him as punishment. The problem is that neither coherently explain what exactly he did wrong by doing so. They don't mention any plans involving the lost bombers he might've thwarted, they don't deny that the dreadnaught was "a fleet killer" that could have killed them right away, they don't accuse him of botching, or even threatening, the evacuation, and neither did his actions have anything to do with First Order's ability to track the Rebels through hyperspace (like, if he inadvertently bought the enemy the precious seconds they needed to lock onto the flagship). Yes, there was the issue of casualties, but, callous as it might sound, they were in a war, heavy casualties had always been the staple of Rebel operations against the Empire in the previous movies, and also it looks really weird for a general and an admiral to suddenly be this torn up and indignant about the loss of a couple dozen people, when literally none of the rank-and-file ever raises this issue, and even the sister of one of deceased pilots almost instantly joins with Poe. The only character shown to have any issues with it outside of Leia and Holdo is Rose on account of her sister dying in it, but she never even remotely bring sup having any issues with Poe, on top of not a single character going against Poe's suggestion to make the bombing run. Between all those factors, it makes it seem like Poe is wrong for making a risky but ultimately successful attack that saved everyone's lives.

to:

** Even before that, the conflict between Poe and Leia/Holdo is sparked by Poe's decisions in battle. He engages in what seems to be a diversion maneuver to buy the rest of the Resistance time to escape from a besieged base. Then he decides that while they're at it, they might as well try to make the First Order pay for the base they destroyed and take out their dreadnaught. He succeeds, disobeying Leia's order to disengage and sacrificing a dozen bombers in the process. Leia/Holdo immediately jump all over his case, calling him too violent and too hot-headed, with Leia even demoting him as punishment. The problem is that neither coherently explain what exactly he did wrong by doing so. They don't mention any plans involving the lost bombers he might've thwarted, they don't deny that the dreadnaught was "a fleet killer" that could have killed them right away, they don't accuse him of botching, or even threatening, the evacuation, and neither did his actions have anything to do with First Order's ability to track the Rebels through hyperspace (like, if he inadvertently bought the enemy the precious seconds they needed to lock onto the flagship). Yes, there was the issue of casualties, but, callous as it might sound, they were in a war, heavy casualties had always been the staple of Rebel operations against the Empire in the previous movies, and also it looks really weird for a general and an admiral to suddenly be this torn up and indignant about the loss of a couple dozen people, when literally none of the rank-and-file ever raises this issue, and even the sister of one of deceased pilots almost instantly joins with Poe. issue. The only character shown to have any issues with it outside of Leia and Holdo is Rose Rose, on account of her sister dying in it, but she never even remotely bring sup brings up having any issues with Poe, on top of not a single character going against Poe's suggestion Poe and is willing to make help him with a plan to save the bombing run.Resistance. Between all those factors, it makes it seem like Poe is wrong for making a risky but ultimately successful attack that saved everyone's lives.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Even before that, the conflict between Poe and Leia/Holdo is sparked by Poe's decisions in battle. He engages in what seems to be a diversion manuevre to buy the rest of the Resistance time to escape from a besieged base. Then he decides that while they're at it, they might as well try to make the First Order pay for the base they destroyed and take out their dreadnaught. He succeeds, disobeying Leia's order to disengage and sacrificing a dozen bombers in the process. Leia/Holdo immediately jump all over his case, calling him too violent and too hot-headed... except neither can coherently explain what '''exactly''' he did wrong. They don't mention any plans involving the lost bombers he might've thwarted, they don't deny that the dreadnaught was "a fleet killer", they don't accuse him of botching, or even threatening, the evacuation, and neither did his actions have anything to do with First Order's ability to track the Rebels through hyperspace (like, if he inadvertently bought the enemy the precious seconds they needed to lock onto the flagship). Yes, there was the issue of casualties, but, callous as it might sound, they were in a war, heavy casualties had always been the staple of Rebel operations against the Empire in the previous movies, and also it looks really weird for a general and an admiral to suddenly be this torn up and indignant about the loss of a couple dozen people, when literally none of the rank-and-file ever raises this issue, and even the sister of one of deceased pilots almost instantly joins with Poe.

to:

** Even before that, the conflict between Poe and Leia/Holdo is sparked by Poe's decisions in battle. He engages in what seems to be a diversion manuevre maneuver to buy the rest of the Resistance time to escape from a besieged base. Then he decides that while they're at it, they might as well try to make the First Order pay for the base they destroyed and take out their dreadnaught. He succeeds, disobeying Leia's order to disengage and sacrificing a dozen bombers in the process. Leia/Holdo immediately jump all over his case, calling him too violent and too hot-headed... except hot-headed, with Leia even demoting him as punishment. The problem is that neither can coherently explain what '''exactly''' exactly he did wrong. wrong by doing so. They don't mention any plans involving the lost bombers he might've thwarted, they don't deny that the dreadnaught was "a fleet killer", killer" that could have killed them right away, they don't accuse him of botching, or even threatening, the evacuation, and neither did his actions have anything to do with First Order's ability to track the Rebels through hyperspace (like, if he inadvertently bought the enemy the precious seconds they needed to lock onto the flagship). Yes, there was the issue of casualties, but, callous as it might sound, they were in a war, heavy casualties had always been the staple of Rebel operations against the Empire in the previous movies, and also it looks really weird for a general and an admiral to suddenly be this torn up and indignant about the loss of a couple dozen people, when literally none of the rank-and-file ever raises this issue, and even the sister of one of deceased pilots almost instantly joins with Poe. The only character shown to have any issues with it outside of Leia and Holdo is Rose on account of her sister dying in it, but she never even remotely bring sup having any issues with Poe, on top of not a single character going against Poe's suggestion to make the bombing run. Between all those factors, it makes it seem like Poe is wrong for making a risky but ultimately successful attack that saved everyone's lives.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''Film/BlackChristmas2006'': TheReveal that Kyle has a sex tape online is treated as some horrendous character flaw on his part. The video was stolen and uploaded to the video without his consent, and yet the sorority sisters treat him as an AssholeVictim because their friend Megan was in it. Said tape was made ''before'' he got with Kelli and he admits he isn't proud of it, making it understandable why he might not have told her yet; especially since it was only put on the internet that day. With regards to Megan, it's never elaborated if she knew she was being filmed, but the angle on the camera indicates that she did - implying it was a sex tape between two consenting adults. Kyle is a victim of revenge porn, and yet the whole thing is treated as his fault.
* ''Film/BlackChristmas2019'':
** Riley is treated as a coward for not wanting to take part in a Christmas dance designed to talk about frat boy rape culture in the very fraternity house where she was raped, with her rapist in the crowd! When she fills in for the ill Helena, she understandably freezes on stage, and just gets an insensitive "rebuild yourself, bitch" from Kris. And then Kris posts a video of the performance online without Riley's consent, and in the video she named Riley's rapist without her knowledge. The movie treats ''Riley'' as being in the wrong for having a problem with this, and she later tells Kris she was right all along.
** Kris on the flipside is treated as crazy for wanting to go to the police, saying they'd never be believed and they need to take the fight directly to the DKO. However, going to the cops would probably be a ''good'' idea in this situation. While it's unlikely the cops would believe them about [[spoiler: the black magic murder cult]], there's still ample proof that members of the frat murdered or tried to murder the sorority sisters, forcing an investigation of the frat and backing up that Riley and Kris acted in self-defence. [[spoiler: When Riley does go to the frat house alone, she gets captured and would've been killed if Kris hadn't been able to persuade another sorority to storm the house]]. By the ending, the girls have possibly made things worse for themselves by burning down the frat and killing everyone, because they've destroyed a lot of evidence corroborating their story. In the worst case scenario the ''girls'' may get punished for [[spoiler: murder/manslaughter and arson]].


Added DiffLines:

* ''Film/JurassicWorld'' has a moment where Owen reacts with horror that Claire doesn't know her nephews' exact ages off the top of her head. The movie also tries to make Claire out to be a horrible workaholic for getting her assistant to watch the nephews when they first arrive, even though it's the middle of the work week and she has to run the very park they're vacationing in.

Changed: 5

Removed: 353

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
justifying edit, and "rank and file" was clarified


** Even before that, the conflict between Poe and Leia/Holdo is sparked by Poe's decisions in battle. He engages in what seems to be a diversion manuevre to buy the rest of the Resistance time to escape from a besieged base. Then he decides that while they're at it, they might as well try to make the First Order pay for the base they destroyed and take out their dreadnaught. He succeeds, disobeying Leia's order to disengage and sacrificing a dozen bombers in the process. Leia/Holdo immediately jump all over his case, calling him too violent and too hot-headed... except neither can coherently explain what '''exactly''' he did wrong. They don't mention any plans involving the lost bombers he might've thwarted, they don't deny that the dreadnaught was "a fleet killer", they don't accuse him of botching, or even threatening, the evacuation, and neither did his actions have nothing to do with First Order's ability to track the Rebels through hyperspace (like, if he inadvertantly bought the enemy the precious seconds they needed to lock onto the flagship). Yes, there was the issue of casualties, but, callous as it might sound, they were in a war, heavy casualties had always been the staple of Rebel operations against the Empire in the previous movies, and also it looks really weird for a general and an admiral to suddenly be this torn up and indignant about the loss of a couple dozen people, when literally none of the rank-and-file ever raises this issue, and even the sister of one of deceased pilots almost instantly joins with Poe.
*** The First Order can afford the losses; the Resistance can't. That one ship Poe threw away lives to destroy is a drop in their ocean of resources, while the Resistance has only a few hundred members left at this point, and Poe just through away a good chunk of ''that'' to destroy a ship their enemy can easily replace. This ''is'' explicitly stated.

to:

** Even before that, the conflict between Poe and Leia/Holdo is sparked by Poe's decisions in battle. He engages in what seems to be a diversion manuevre to buy the rest of the Resistance time to escape from a besieged base. Then he decides that while they're at it, they might as well try to make the First Order pay for the base they destroyed and take out their dreadnaught. He succeeds, disobeying Leia's order to disengage and sacrificing a dozen bombers in the process. Leia/Holdo immediately jump all over his case, calling him too violent and too hot-headed... except neither can coherently explain what '''exactly''' he did wrong. They don't mention any plans involving the lost bombers he might've thwarted, they don't deny that the dreadnaught was "a fleet killer", they don't accuse him of botching, or even threatening, the evacuation, and neither did his actions have nothing anything to do with First Order's ability to track the Rebels through hyperspace (like, if he inadvertantly inadvertently bought the enemy the precious seconds they needed to lock onto the flagship). Yes, there was the issue of casualties, but, callous as it might sound, they were in a war, heavy casualties had always been the staple of Rebel operations against the Empire in the previous movies, and also it looks really weird for a general and an admiral to suddenly be this torn up and indignant about the loss of a couple dozen people, when literally none of the rank-and-file ever raises this issue, and even the sister of one of deceased pilots almost instantly joins with Poe.
*** The First Order can afford the losses; the Resistance can't. That one ship Poe threw away lives to destroy is a drop in their ocean of resources, while the Resistance has only a few hundred members left at this point, and Poe just through away a good chunk of ''that'' to destroy a ship their enemy can easily replace. This ''is'' explicitly stated.
Poe.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Elmo's attachment to his blanket in ''Film/TheAdventuresOfElmoInGrouchland'' is presented as him being greedy, as well as him refusing to share it with anyone else. However, Elmo having an attachment towards his blanket comes off as less of him being greedy and more as him being a child attached to a security blanket, which is perfectly normal for a child and not wanting to lose it or have it damaged by someone is also understandable. And Elmo did allow Zoe to hold his blanket for a couple of seconds, but Zoe's refusal to give back something that's not her belonging and getting into a tug of war over the blanket with Elmo and resulting in Elmo losing it makes Zoe come off as more of the one being greedy instead of Elmo. [[note]] A Season 50 episode from ''Series/SesameStreet'' rectifies this issue when Rudy takes Julia's stuffed bunny to play with. Julia doesn't take too kindly to it and begins throwing a tantrum. Alan explains to Rudy that Julia's bunny is a comfort item that helps her when she’s scared or in a bad mood, so it's not for sharing. Rudy understands and apologizes for taking Julia's toy. [[/note]]

to:

* Elmo's attachment to his blanket in ''Film/TheAdventuresOfElmoInGrouchland'' is presented as him being greedy, as well as him refusing to share it with anyone else. However, Elmo having an attachment towards his blanket comes off as less of him being greedy and more as him being a child attached to a security blanket, which is perfectly normal for a child and not wanting to lose it or have it damaged by someone is also understandable. And Elmo did allow Zoe to hold his blanket for a couple of seconds, but Zoe's refusal to give back something that's not her belonging and belonging, getting into a tug of war over the blanket with Elmo Elmo, and resulting in Elmo losing it makes Zoe come off as more of the one being greedy instead of Elmo. [[note]] A Season 50 episode from ''Series/SesameStreet'' rectifies this issue when Rudy takes Julia's stuffed bunny to play with. Julia doesn't take too kindly to it and begins throwing a tantrum. Alan explains to Rudy that Julia's bunny is a comfort item that helps her when she’s she's scared or in a bad mood, so it's not for sharing. Rudy understands and apologizes for taking Julia's toy. [[/note]]

Added: 726

Removed: 726

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In ''Film/AStarIsBorn2018'', Ally's manager Rez is treated as being in the wrong because he doesn't want Ally to bring Jackson with her on tour. Thing is, he's absolutely right not to want Jackson along because Ally spends all her time when he is with her coddling Jackson, checking up on him and neglecting her own work to babysit him and Jackson ruins Ally's award show by getting drunk and humiliating her on national television. When he gives Jackson a TheReasonYouSuckSpeech on his selfishness and how all he does is hold Ally back, it's treated as the final straw and part of the reason [[spoiler: Jackson committed suicide]], but it's Jackson's responsibility and Rez simply told him the truth he didn't want to hear.



* In ''Film/AStarIsBorn2018'', Ally's manager Rez is treated as being in the wrong because he doesn't want Ally to bring Jackson with her on tour. Thing is, he's absolutely right not to want Jackson along because Ally spends all her time when he is with her coddling Jackson, checking up on him and neglecting her own work to babysit him and Jackson ruins Ally's award show by getting drunk and humiliating her on national television. When he gives Jackson a TheReasonYouSuckSpeech on his selfishness and how all he does is hold Ally back, it's treated as the final straw and part of the reason [[spoiler: Jackson committed suicide]], but it's Jackson's responsibility and Rez simply told him the truth he didn't want to hear.

Changed: 102

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** The First Order can afford the losses; the Resistance can't. That one ship Poe threw away lives to destroy is a drop in their ocean of resources, while the Resistance has only a few hundred members left at this point, and Poe just through away a good chunk of ''that'' on a victory that achieved absolutely nothing beyond looking cool.

to:

*** The First Order can afford the losses; the Resistance can't. That one ship Poe threw away lives to destroy is a drop in their ocean of resources, while the Resistance has only a few hundred members left at this point, and Poe just through away a good chunk of ''that'' on to destroy a victory that achieved absolutely nothing beyond looking cool.ship their enemy can easily replace. This ''is'' explicitly stated.

Top