Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Headscratchers / TheThing1982

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** No he doesn't, Carter-Thing doesn't have an earring at the end which is what makes Kate suspicious. Carter-Thing indicating the wrong ear for where the earring should be is what confirms her suspicions.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Answer to headscratcher about Antarctic mountains



to:

** This is not a mistake. Transantarctic Mountains are not entirely covered with snow and ice. Rock can also be visible. Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transantarctic_Mountains
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Correct format of previous edit


** To quote MacReady: This thing wakes up after thousands of years in the ice... probably not the best of moods...
Also, intelligent does not mean peaceful. Let's not make the same assumption than Professor Kessler in Mars Attacks: “We know they're extremely advanced technologically, which suggests - very rightfully so - that they're peaceful. An advanced civilization, by definition, is not barbaric.” The thing, though intelligent, is aggressive and seems to have a compulsion to destroy other life forms.

to:

** To quote MacReady: This thing wakes up after thousands of years in the ice... probably not the best of moods...
moods... Also, intelligent does not mean peaceful. Let's not make the same assumption than Professor Kessler in Mars Attacks: “We know they're extremely advanced technologically, which suggests - very rightfully so - that they're peaceful. An advanced civilization, by definition, is not barbaric.” The thing, though intelligent, is aggressive and seems to have a compulsion to destroy other life forms.

Changed: 600

Removed: 104

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Correct format of previous edit


Also, intelligent does not mean peaceful.
Let's not make the same assumption than Professor Kessler in Mars Attacks: “We know they're extremely advanced technologically, which suggests - very rightfully so - that they're peaceful. An advanced civilization, by definition, is not barbaric.”
The thing, though intelligent, is aggressive and seems to have a compulsion to destroy other life forms.

to:

Also, intelligent does not mean peaceful.
peaceful. Let's not make the same assumption than Professor Kessler in Mars Attacks: “We know they're extremely advanced technologically, which suggests - very rightfully so - that they're peaceful. An advanced civilization, by definition, is not barbaric.
The thing, though intelligent, is aggressive and seems to have a compulsion to destroy other life forms.

Added: 392

Changed: 114

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Add answer to headscratcher about why the thing does not try to communicate peacefully



to:

** To quote MacReady: This thing wakes up after thousands of years in the ice... probably not the best of moods...
Also, intelligent does not mean peaceful.
Let's not make the same assumption than Professor Kessler in Mars Attacks: “We know they're extremely advanced technologically, which suggests - very rightfully so - that they're peaceful. An advanced civilization, by definition, is not barbaric.”
The thing, though intelligent, is aggressive and seems to have a compulsion to destroy other life forms.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** I have the impression that while on the surface, the movie is about "Don't trust anybody", the true message is that "people should trust and connect to one another". The Thing could be ousted more easily were the characters to actually cooperate instead of losing themselves to paranoia and infighting throughout. By staying close, one man with a flamethrower could deal with a Thing quite easily, thus minimizing casualties (these creatures do not seem to be good fighters, the main threat is when they are hidden). By acting alone too much, more secrecy ensues, sowing more distrust amongst the men, allowing the Thing to take over more easily.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Fixed some spelling and grammatical mistakes.


** Yes but they had ample time between the inital attack and the "dog" being put in the kennel to give it some thought.Honestly suprised that they didn't consider rabis as being a reson for the Norwegiangs has "gone crazy", and it would of lined up with the dogs behaviour, rabis can present as docility in certain stages.

to:

** Yes Yes, but they had ample time between the inital attack and the "dog" being put in the kennel to give it some thought.thought. Honestly suprised that they didn't consider rabis rabies as being a reson reason for the Norwegiangs has Norwegians having "gone crazy", and it crazy". It would of have lined up with the dogs dog's behaviour, rabis rabies can present as docility in certain stages.

Added: 56

Changed: 695

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** Yes but they had ample time between the inital attack and the "dog" being put in the kennel to give it some thought.Honestly suprised that they didn't consider rabis as being a reson for the Norwegiangs has "gone crazy", and it would of lined up with the dogs behaviour, rabis can present as docility in certain stages.



** It might only be able to assimilate fauna, not flora.




to:

**Plus they wanted to elimenate any trace of the thing, since they belived that every inch of it was a living thing capable.




to:

** A quarantine area is standard practice when you have multiple animals in the same place, incase one gets sick or injured.




to:

** The Amricans radio wasn't working for weeks because of the weather, persumably the Norwegian base was having similar isues
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* So if both Garry and Cooper weren't infected, then how ''did'' the Thing get into the blood supply?

to:

* So if both Garry and Cooper weren't infected, then how ''did'' '''did''' the Thing get into the blood supply?



*** Blair!Thing ''could'' have had two very good reasons for destroying communications and transportation. One, it's what Human!Blair would do given the information he had about the Thing. Two, it enforces the ClosedCircle setting. The Thing is vulnerable so long as there's one human around who knows what it is and can expose and burn it. Trapping everyone in the confines of the base and preventing them from explaining what they've learned means the Thing has all winter to assimilate everyone. Eventually, someone will come to check on the outpost, bringing their own transportation. The Things can make up any story they like about what happened and get a free ride back to civilization.

to:

*** Blair!Thing ''could'' '''could''' have had two very good reasons for destroying communications and transportation. One, it's what Human!Blair would do given the information he had about the Thing. Two, it enforces the ClosedCircle setting. The Thing is vulnerable so long as there's one human around who knows what it is and can expose and burn it. Trapping everyone in the confines of the base and preventing them from explaining what they've learned means the Thing has all winter to assimilate everyone. Eventually, someone will come to check on the outpost, bringing their own transportation. The Things can make up any story they like about what happened and get a free ride back to civilization.
**** A Thing knows what its host knew. Blair was a microbiologist, not a helicopter pilot; thus, the Thing used parts from "thing I have learned '''can''' fly" to build "thing I already know '''how''' to fly."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** On top of everything else said in this thread, assimilation looks to be extremely painful. At best, you're looking at a very violent "surgery" to become a Thing. Even "slow" transformations like the radio guy required extended exposure to the organism's biomass.




to:

** I had this thought just today, and I think the very idea that a Thing can infect you with a slight touch is nonsense. If that were true, MacReady would've become a thing during the blood test. I think it's more like Muzan Kibutsuji from ''Demon Slayer'': There is no accidental infection, The Thing has to be fully willing to inject enough biomass into a person to take them over. And it requires more than a single cell to take something over. Of course, this also begs the question of the difference between an imitation and an infection.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** If the Thing couldn't use iron at all, you'd think the humans could ''smell'' its blood wasn't real human blood rather than having to use heat to test it. Iron is an essential component of hemoglobin, after all.

Added: 426

Changed: 1

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Not necessarily. Possibly it only possessed intelligence intermittently, when it's imitating an intelligent life form. It can play at being human once it's actually built itself a human brain to think ''with'', or fly a spaceship if it's imitating whatever alien race it hijacked the ship from, but its mental functions degenerate into reactivity and instinct when it goes into attack-mode as a mishmash killing machine.



** Also thought of in the Novel in another way: the team kill an Albatross found on Antartica so the Thing can't absorb it to grow wings.

to:

** Also thought of in the Novel in another way: the team kill an Albatross found on Antartica Antarctica so the Thing can't absorb it to grow wings.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** But even considering all that, there are multiple kinds of intelligence. Just because it can build a spaceship doesn't necessarily mean it can conceive of ideas like "Make friends with the humans". There's no telling what strange gaps an alien intelligence might have in its thinking.

to:

*** **** But even considering all that, there are multiple kinds of intelligence. Just because it can build a spaceship doesn't necessarily mean it can conceive of ideas like "Make friends with the humans". There's no telling what strange gaps an alien intelligence might have in its thinking.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** But even considering all that, there are multiple kinds of intelligence. Just because it can build a spaceship doesn't mean it can conceive of ideas like "Make friends with the humans". There's no telling what strange gaps an alien intelligence might have in its thinking.

to:

*** But even considering all that, there are multiple kinds of intelligence. Just because it can build a spaceship doesn't necessarily mean it can conceive of ideas like "Make friends with the humans". There's no telling what strange gaps an alien intelligence might have in its thinking.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

**** But even considering all that, there are multiple kinds of intelligence. Just because it can build a spaceship doesn't mean it can conceive of ideas like "Make friends with the humans". There's no telling what strange gaps an alien intelligence might have in its thinking.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Added explanation about Norris-Thing



to:

** It was basically a distraction to cover for the Norris head-Thing's escape. It knew it is surrounded and will most likely be burned, so it sprouted another "head" to allow for the original "head" to escape.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
spelling


** Another possibility is that the Thing devours and kills its victims before it starts to build the imitation. During the devouring, most likey a "scanning" process is taking place, so the thing examines how the cells and the entire body/system is structured, so it can recreate it later. According to this interpretation, the takeover and the imitation does not happen on a cell by cell basis (the Thing is an organism, not a virus), but first the victim is devoured, killed and "scanned", and an imitation is built only after that. With Bennings, for a few seconds we see how the thing is building the Bennings-imitation, when Windows is returning to the room, and later when the Bennings-imitation is running out to the snow, the vocal chords and the hands are not yet formed. So in essence every "cell" of every imitation is a thing-cell, created by the thing during the imitation phase, so they are capable of the radical shapeshifting we see the imitations routinely performing when they are busted (Palmer-Thing) or otherwise disturbed (Norris-Thing).

to:

** Another possibility is that the Thing devours and kills its victims before it starts to build the imitation. During the devouring, most likey a "scanning" process is taking place, so the thing Thing examines how the cells and the entire body/system is structured, so it can recreate it later. According to this interpretation, the takeover and the imitation does not happen on a cell by cell basis (the Thing is an organism, not a virus), but first the victim is devoured, killed and "scanned", and an imitation is built only after that. With Bennings, for a few seconds we see how the thing is building the Bennings-imitation, when Windows is returning to the room, and later when the Bennings-imitation is running out to the snow, the vocal chords and the hands are not yet formed. So in essence every "cell" of every imitation is a thing-cell, created by the thing during the imitation phase, so they are capable of the radical shapeshifting we see the imitations routinely performing when they are busted (Palmer-Thing) or otherwise disturbed (Norris-Thing).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Added another view on how the Thing operates



to:

** Another possibility is that the Thing devours and kills its victims before it starts to build the imitation. During the devouring, most likey a "scanning" process is taking place, so the thing examines how the cells and the entire body/system is structured, so it can recreate it later. According to this interpretation, the takeover and the imitation does not happen on a cell by cell basis (the Thing is an organism, not a virus), but first the victim is devoured, killed and "scanned", and an imitation is built only after that. With Bennings, for a few seconds we see how the thing is building the Bennings-imitation, when Windows is returning to the room, and later when the Bennings-imitation is running out to the snow, the vocal chords and the hands are not yet formed. So in essence every "cell" of every imitation is a thing-cell, created by the thing during the imitation phase, so they are capable of the radical shapeshifting we see the imitations routinely performing when they are busted (Palmer-Thing) or otherwise disturbed (Norris-Thing).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Well, it's definitely multicellular, since the whole blood test is predicated on each individual grouping of cells being it's own complete organism. As for it "feeding," the impression I got from the computer model was the the individual cells acted more like a virus, infecting the cells that are already there and transforming them from human cells to Thing cells. It's not consuming the body and replacing it, it's ''converting'' the body.

to:

*** Well, it's definitely multicellular, since the whole blood test is predicated on each individual grouping of cells being it's own complete organism. As for it "feeding," the impression I got from the computer model was the the individual cells acted more like a virus, infecting the cells that are already there and transforming them from human cells to Thing cells. It's not consuming the body and replacing it, it's ''converting'' the body.



** They weren't exactly thinking straight at that point, and the prequel shows the the actual pilot of the helicopter had no real idea why the hell Lars wanted to kill that dog so badly.

to:

** They weren't exactly thinking straight at that point, and the prequel shows the the actual pilot of the helicopter had no real idea why the hell Lars wanted to kill that dog so badly.



** Here's some FridgeHorror for you. Earlier in the movie, [=MacReady=] was warned that it was possible for just one cell of the The Thing to infect an entire person, and everyone should prepare their own meals and only eat out of cans. At the end, [=MacReady=] hands Childs a bottle of whisky. When Childs takes a drink, [=MacReady=] chuckles. . .
** Or maybe he's just laughing over Childs accepting the drink at all since Childs had been acting very antagonistic towards him during the film. That doesn't necessarily indicate he could be the the Thing.

to:

** Here's some FridgeHorror for you. Earlier in the movie, [=MacReady=] was warned that it was possible for just one cell of the The Thing to infect an entire person, and everyone should prepare their own meals and only eat out of cans. At the end, [=MacReady=] hands Childs a bottle of whisky. When Childs takes a drink, [=MacReady=] chuckles. . .
** Or maybe he's just laughing over Childs accepting the drink at all since Childs had been acting very antagonistic towards him during the film. That doesn't necessarily indicate he could be the the Thing.



** Freezing and sleeping is just part one of it's presumed plan, it needs to be found by a rescue team so it can reach civilization. Presumably the The Thing would not want to freeze outside the camp, as it would likely be buried in the snow and never found (it took 100,000 years for its ''massive'' spaceship to be found). As far as destroying themselves goes, they were already as good as dead. With the generator gone, even the interior of the camp would eventually become lethally cold. The only thing they could hope to do was deny The Thing a safe place to impersonate a frozen corpse.

to:

** Freezing and sleeping is just part one of it's presumed plan, it needs to be found by a rescue team so it can reach civilization. Presumably the The Thing would not want to freeze outside the camp, as it would likely be buried in the snow and never found (it took 100,000 years for its ''massive'' spaceship to be found). As far as destroying themselves goes, they were already as good as dead. With the generator gone, even the interior of the camp would eventually become lethally cold. The only thing they could hope to do was deny The Thing a safe place to impersonate a frozen corpse.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** It also made noise as it crawled, which the others couldn't possibly have missed hearing once the racket from the fire and extinguishers died down.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Leave it outside on a chain lead, put it in Blair's shed, keep it in a storage room. Plenty of options that don't involve risking a nasty dogfight.

to:

** Leave it outside on a chain lead, confine it in a dog crate, put it in Blair's shed, keep it in a storage room. room, house it in his own bedroom. Plenty of options that don't ''don't'' involve risking a nasty dogfight.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** Leave it outside on a chain lead, put it in Blair's shed, keep it in a storage room. Plenty of options that don't involve risking a nasty dogfight.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** Rewatch the scene of Windows finding Bennings being turned by the Thing and listen very closely. Right before Windows leaves in fright, you can hear the distinct sound of something metallic dropping on the floor. The implication that Windows grabbed the keys from Garry, went back to Bennings and dropped them when he saw what was happening. From there, the Thing could easily have grabbed them, done what needed to be done and returned them to Garry, with the lie that Windows gave them the keys after using them. That's probably why Windows panicked and went for a rifle during the argument later when the blood was found. He figured that they would realize he had the keys last and suspect him, which caused him to want something to defend himself.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The Norwegians discover the alien ship and dig it up. We can see they use dynamite to uncover it. But would a normal scientific expedition to Antarctica have the resources to dig up with such thorough neatness an enormous spaceship as shown in the film? And wouldn't such an extraordinary discovery prompt them to radio back home what they found? How long would they take to remove all the ice from the ship? In that case wouldn't that take enough time for the excavation to become some sort of priority for the Norwegian Government enough to prevent the Norwegian camp from becoming isolated at all?

to:

* The Norwegians discover the alien ship and dig it up. We can see they use dynamite to uncover it. But would a normal scientific expedition to Antarctica have the resources to dig up with such thorough neatness an enormous spaceship as shown in the film? And wouldn't such an extraordinary discovery prompt them to radio back home what they found? How long would they take to remove all the ice from the ship? In that case wouldn't that take enough time for the excavation to become some sort of priority for the Norwegian Government enough to prevent the Norwegian camp from becoming isolated at all?all?

* So who ''did'' have the keys? Windows asks Bennings for them, and Bennings replied with, "Get them from Garry, there's some stuff I want to get from here." Which implies he ''does'' have the keys and wants to keep hold of them. Then Windows returns later after Bennings has been assimilated with another set of keys- but where did he get this set from without Garry noticing? My only explanation is that Bennings has his own set of keys (see my WMG that Bennings was Garry's deputy) which he keeps in his room or something and Windows was asking him to fetch them, but the existence of a third set of keys seems like a pretty big thing to gloss over.

* When Fuchs realizes that the infected remains are still alive...why does he decide to casually warn Macready instead of telling Windows and Bennings to get the hell out of there and burn the thing? Bennings' death was essentially his fault. And why does he trust Macready in particular, other than the fact he's the protagonist? Garry or Bennings seem like the obvious choices and they're just as trustworthy as anyone else at that point.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** The only people who go off alone are Fuchs about halfway through, Childs just before the climax, and Garry and Nauls at the very end. Fuchs was working in the lab on his own, but even then he was probably fairly close to the others and would have been fine if he hadn't tried to follow Blair, probably in a mad rush to see who it was before they vanished. Childs is actually relatively safe at the end, since he's armed and he knows there's only one Thing left, Blair. It makes sense that the majority would go out to test Blair since they weren't expecting him to have escaped, even if he was a thing. With Nauls and Garry, both were under serious time restraints to get the explosives set up before the Thing attacked and didn't have time to keep each other company.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

*** Like any other creature, it wants to feed and reproduce.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

*** Clark spends the time with the dog at the start of the movie; by the time the men are completely sure something's going on, the Thing's lost its chance to get Clark alone.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Are explosives the way to go when dealing with this creature? It seems like the troll in D&D: as long as the damage isn't done by fire, it'll regenerate, no matter how catastrophic the damage was. When Macready blew up Palmer-thing, he may have actually saved it: by blowing it apart, the fire is instantly extinguished, and doubtlessly several fragments got separated from the burning flesh, and would recombine and rebuild.

to:

* Are explosives the way to go when dealing with this creature? It seems like the troll in D&D: as long as the damage isn't done by fire, it'll regenerate, no matter how catastrophic the damage was. When Macready blew up Palmer-thing, he may have actually saved it: by blowing it apart, the fire is instantly extinguished, and doubtlessly several fragments got separated from the burning flesh, and would recombine and rebuild.rebuild.

* The Norwegians discover the alien ship and dig it up. We can see they use dynamite to uncover it. But would a normal scientific expedition to Antarctica have the resources to dig up with such thorough neatness an enormous spaceship as shown in the film? And wouldn't such an extraordinary discovery prompt them to radio back home what they found? How long would they take to remove all the ice from the ship? In that case wouldn't that take enough time for the excavation to become some sort of priority for the Norwegian Government enough to prevent the Norwegian camp from becoming isolated at all?

Added: 427

Changed: 168

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** A ranting lunatic just shows up and starts shooting up your base with an assault rifle: you're probably not going to weigh the context very carefully before you act.



** Because that's what Palmer would have said. Palmer is shown to be a wisecracker, and the Thing perfectly imitates personalities. It's also shown to be selfish and uncaring about other Things.

to:

** Because that's what Palmer would have said. Palmer is shown to be a wisecracker, and the Thing perfectly imitates personalities. It's also shown to be selfish and uncaring about other Things.Things.

* Are explosives the way to go when dealing with this creature? It seems like the troll in D&D: as long as the damage isn't done by fire, it'll regenerate, no matter how catastrophic the damage was. When Macready blew up Palmer-thing, he may have actually saved it: by blowing it apart, the fire is instantly extinguished, and doubtlessly several fragments got separated from the burning flesh, and would recombine and rebuild.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Another interpretation somewhere on this site is that Palmer!Thing was ''genuinely astounded'' at the fleeing head's stupidly-obvious escape attempt.

to:

** Another interpretation somewhere on this site is that Palmer!Thing was ''genuinely astounded'' at the fleeing head's stupidly-obvious escape attempt.attempt.
** Because that's what Palmer would have said. Palmer is shown to be a wisecracker, and the Thing perfectly imitates personalities. It's also shown to be selfish and uncaring about other Things.

Top