Headscratchers / The Thing (1982)

  • One thing (geddit) that bothers me about the Thing is how it seemingly defies the laws of thermodynamics. I mean, cells need nutrients and energy, which would be obtained when it would assimilate other living beings. However, to do this, it would need to dismantle the victim and use it's biomass to provide for the already assimilated cells. Logic dictates that, in the end, at half of the prey's biomass would be used to sustain the existing cells, which suffice to say it wouldn't be of much use when trying to create a copy, since at most only some appendages would be left. Who Goes There? somewhat adresses this because the Thing is more like a sophisticated Blob that may or may not be actually a highly sophisticated monocellular organism. In the 1982 and 2011 remakes, it doesn't have this excuse, and worse yet it is clear that it was in dire need of "feeding", as the dog scene illustrated. So, the only logical explanation is that The Thing is somehow shitting out biomass out of thin air...
    • Well it is an Eldritch Abomination, so it's not like it has any reason to follow thermodynamics as we know it. I'd say Rule of Scary is in effect rather than any sense to follow reality.
      • I never assumed the dog scene to be about feeding. A necessity to feed would be a noticeable weakness in the alien since it would have to regularly drop its disguise, something I never assumed would be a necessity for it. I always thought it was simply trying to assimilate the dogs. I also always assumed that the Thing was indeed a monocellular type organism that could essentially reshape itself to mimic other organisms and their constituent parts. So it doesn't really have bone marrow, blood running through its veins and such, it's just a mimic of those things and all the parts are just the original Thing playing pretend.
      • Well, it's definitely multicellular, since the whole blood test is predicated on each individual grouping of cells being it's own complete organism. As for it "feeding," the impression I got from the computer model was the the individual cells acted more like a virus, infecting the cells that are already there and transforming them from human cells to Thing cells. It's not consuming the body and replacing it, it's converting the body.
      • IT'S A FUCKING ALIEN!
  • Why doesn't the Thing try to communicate with the humans? It's obviously not a dumb animal operating simply on instinct, since it is shown to be able to operate the alien spaceship and attempt to build some spaceship. I always thought what happened in the Norwegian camp was a huge misunderstanding that escalated into shit hitting the proverbial fan, and by the time it reached Outpost 31 it the Thing was as afraid and paranoid as the humans surrounding it. But the prequel shows that it attacked first, without provocation, so it's just doing it for the evulz?
    • The Thing isn't a dumb animal acting on instinct it's an advanced virus acting on instinct. Whereas humans need intelligence to survive and reproduce, The Thing needs intelligence as a tool for reproduction and the assimilation of biomass/adaptations. Just as a secret agent might use their intelligence to form a disguise to seduce/extract information from someone, The Thing likely sees humans as some sex-food equivalent. The assumption that The Thing's intelligence implies the capacity for compassion or coexistence is like thinking a tree knows about aerodynamics because it makes helicopter-seeds to spread its genes further. For The Thing, building a spaceship is like a virus becoming airborne via an evolved protein casing - the spaceship is simply a container of the pathogen for reaching distant hosts. The idea of Good and Evil come from the social instincts of a social animal so that we can survive better, e.g. Good is beneficial to communities and Evil is detrimental to it... In this case, as a pathogen with pathogenic instincts rather than social ones, it would be likely to see assimilation as fundamentally Good for spreading genetic superiority and regard resistance to assimilation as the Evil waste of adaptability-potential.
    • A nice thing about the Thing is that we never really know its level of intelligence. It is truly alien. It might be an intelligent shape-shifter who is play-acting at being human and for whatever reason never attempts to talk to the hostile creatures called humanity, or its imitation of humanity might be only be the camouflage of a dumb animal and it has no thoughts on the level of intelligence of humans, or something in between.
    • The Thing's intelligence is seriously all over the place. Yes, it does a lot of smart things in the movies, but it also does some pretty dumb stuff than even earth predatory animals would avoid. My personal guess is that the basic Thing isn't intelligent at all, and as it absorbs sapient beings like the aliens in the saucer and the humans, it has much more info it can use (IE how to operate the space craft) but it doesn't necessarily make it smarter. It would be akin to a person memorizing every word on a book, but not understanding the meaning of the whole thing.
    • The book seems to support that, as the Thing from it is merely an imitator who has no knowledge of what the hell it is doing. Mind you, said thing was also considerably different from the movie things, so...
    • Maybe it is just doing it for the sake of killing and maiming. Maybe it's the alien version of a serial killer, and like Hannibal Lecter it keeps slipping away from its captors to kill again.
    • How we do know sampling biomass isn't how it communicates? Maybe we just interpreted its attempts at communications as attacks.
    • It could be that the Thing is like an insect. It has no concept of right and wrong nor an ability to see humans as worthy of life. It's a predator and everything else is prey, plain and simple; it has no ability to think otherwise.
      • If you watch the first movie with the prequel in mind (I know, we try to avoid that but be strong) a lot of its smarter actions seem to be based on things it learned in the last film. It's not intelligent per se but it's like a really smart hunting animal learning how its enemies operate. I think the last poster with the insect comparison is probably more on the nose with its thought patterns with that in mind.
    • On the other hand, maybe it considers itself so far in advance of humans that it feels communication is waste. We don't politely ask cockroaches to leave our domiciles. . . we spray pesticides at them. The Thing won't just politely ask us to let it absorb our knowledge and consciousness. . . it just takes them.
  • How the fuck does The Thing operate? Just assimilating cells does not grant it the capacity of replicating an entire organism, since it has no way of knowing how the cells are meant to be structured. I've seen suggestions of quantum computing and specialized photo-bionics, but is it even possible to achieve such a level of cell coordination in things (hurr hurr) that seem to not rely on nervous impulses? I know there's simple organisms that show cell plasticity, but they communicate by chemicals, and there's no way something that complex is going to change from a dog into Cthulhu's vagina just by shooting chemicals.
    • Humans use thousands of enzymes to catalyze reactions with less energy than would otherwise be possible. Life stores energy for these reactions in a variety of ways, some more efficient than others. As a being that has absorbed thousands of biospheres, it could be expected to have the MOST efficient equivalent for everything we have. I would argue that the most logical and plausible way The Thing could accomplish this is through genetic computation, dense metabolic energy storage system, and efficient biochemical catalysts primed to issue an inconceivably large number of phenotypical changes on the fly. I imagine that if it's possible, The Thing can do it better - if fungi in Chernobyl can use gamma radiation for energy, the thing could EAT URANIUM.
    • Well if you think about it, what it really does is infect a person and then from there use their body. When it unfolds from its hidden form we never see it go back to its original form. It's only in expanded universe stuff that we see it actually revert into a normal form. As such I tend to view it as it infests someone, turning them into a Thing and then they can essentially toss off their disguise to assume the monster form. It's like it can, at will, turn mass from one thing into another so intestines start shaping into the tentacles, organs get turned into goop to be reshaped into other tentacles or teeth for attacks and so on.
  • If the Thing's goal is to leave Antarctica and infect the other land masses, why didn't it simply grow wings and fly to where it wanted to go?
    • If it can only imitate life forms it has already encountered then it would need to have encountered something that can fly in Earth's gravity and atmospheric conditions (and in Antarctica's cold) before it could sprout usable wings.
    • Presumably, the Things hadn't assimilated any flying species. Or, for that matter, any species that wouldn't get frozen in Antarctica, until it assimilated the dogs.
    • From the original novel:
"Man studied birds for centuries, trying to learn how to make a machine to fly like them. He never did do the trick; his final success came when he broke away entirely and tried new methods. Knowing the general idea, and knowing the detailed structure of wing and bone and nerve-tissue is something far, far different. And as for otherworld birds, perhaps, in fact very probably, the atmospheric conditions here are so vastly different that their birds couldn't fly. Perhaps, even, the being came from a planet like Mars with such a thin atmosphere that there were no birds."
  • The simplest explanation for the film is that any form of animal locomotion would have been insufficient to get it out of Antarctica before it froze again.
  • So, if they can't know who's infected, why do they keep going off alone? It's not a perfect solution, but wouldn't staying in one another's company help stave off infection without the Thing revealing itself?
    • Honestly, because it keeps the plot moving. There's no real in-universe explanation that I can think of. In fact, you could ask this same question about pretty much every horror movie made from about the late 70's to the early to mid 90's, and the answer is the same.
    • I actually don't remember anybody going out alone after they find out that they're dealing with an assimilating alien virus. Blair being an obvious exception, who decided to go off alone since he felt he couldn't trust anybody.
    • IIRC, Alan Dean Foster's novelization explained that hole. The base required a bit of maintenance to stay up in the winter, and there wasn't enough workers to allow for a buddy system.
    • Staying in one big group is actually one of the stupider things they could've done. If they're all in the same room together all the Thing has to do is grow its fingers into tentacles with sharps spikes on the end and stab them each in the chest. Bam. Now everyone's infected.
      • Assimilation isn't instant. If it did this way, they'd have time to burn themselves.
      • Not if the Thing cells are inside them.
      • Even if assimilation isn't instant, there's nothing to say they'd be able to resist. We don't even know what happened to Fuchs exactly, but Bennings is quite obviously incapacitated during assimilation.
      • That the Thing never actually did this, while having the good occasion more than once, is actually one of the best pointers against the "one cell" theory. The Thing doesn't do or even try this, so we can assume that it's not capable of it. The Thing is not a virus in the microbiological sense.
      • Uh, yeah, it pretty much is. We clearly see in Blair's computer simulation that each cell is capable of assimilating and infecting surrounding cells. Honestly it's the only possible explanation for how the Thing's physiology would work. Otherwise there would be no way for Norris' head to detach from his body, sprout legs, and scuttle away on its own.
      • Bennings was incapacitated during assimilation because the Thing was restraining him like the dogs in the kennel. Without being restrained even infected humans would have enough time to burn the Thing and then themselves. Besides whenever we see the Thing taking its true form it always takes enough time to at least react. And there are no guarantee it would even be able to hit all targets at once. In short, such direct attack would be just plain suicide. Granted, the Thing could probably try that anyway, if it didn't see other way out (there were several infected people after all), but we'll never know.
    • The novel also explains, that they figured out from previous examples, that the Thing needs around an hour to fully assimilate someone, so they agree to meet every 20 minutes. Who does not show up, will be hunted down and killed on sight.
    • To put it simply, they didn't trust one another. Initially they did try to stick together after they found the UFO in the Norwegian camp, but that changed after they killed Bennings-Thing and realized someone else had been assimilated. Suddenly Blair goes batshit and destroys the helicopter, radio equipment and kills the rest of the dogs, Clark gets despondent, and Childs is suspicious of MacReady. They could have stayed together, it's just that everyone thought one another was infected, and they knew they couldn't let themselves be rescued when one of them could be assimilated. Note that they do eventually decide to stick together once they've confirmed who was really infected and had dealt with them.
    • Because it gives the ending more of a hook. Is one or the other assimilated? Also, the Blair-Thing got more biomass from assimilating Garry, and possibly the still-living remains of other Things joined with it as well - what tries to come out of it at the end is a mangled dog.
    • Actually, a buddy system would be the absolute stupidest thing they could do. Pair everyone up, if you happen to get paired up with someone who is the Thing, then it has all the time alone it needs to assimilate you. If two people are the Thing, then two more people are assimilated, and so on. You don't even have the dubious benefit of the Clue buddy system, knowing that if Person A turns up dead than person B must be the killer, because both Person A and Person B come back, although now they're both The Thing. Complete isolation was actually pretty smart. It's even stated that, if only one cell of the Thing can completely assimilate a person, everyone should prepare their own meals and only eat out of sealed containers, because anyone could tamper with the food otherwise.
  • This troper has always loved this film. But one thing has always bugged me: The radios. Wouldn't there have been multiple transmitters around the compound and wouldn't there have been a strict radio contact schedule in place in case of emergencies. Even if you were able to destroy all of the radio (and in a manner where they couldn't be repaired) how do you handle the contact schedule?
    • Didn't the incoming storm prevent them from radioing out?
      • Yes it did. Windows mentions during the beginning that they can't get a signal in the snow.
    • Blair was either insane or assimilated at that point. If he was insane, he was being overly paranoid and didn't want them to be able to call anyone, who would come in and risk those people getting infected or transporting a Thing to populated areas. If he was assimilated, he didn't want the humans to be able to warn anyone on the outside about the Things.
  • So, what was The Thing planning to do? What was the point of taking over the Earth by assimilating into every living being? Is there an advantage to it being everywhere or is The Thing's goals not logically sound?
    • We don't know anything about The Thing's backstory, so really it's impossible to say what it was actually thinking the whole time, or what it was doing on Earth in the first place (did it end up on Earth by accident or pure chance, or was an invasion planned from the beginning? Was The Thing acting on its own initiative, or was it a sort of biological weapon sent by another alien species - there are many theories out there). It is likewise unclear whether the assimilation process is necessary in order for The Thing to sustain itself (ie: providing it with nutrition), a purely defensive tactic used to conceal itself and eliminate potential enemies, or simply a means of reproduction. Since the events are shown almost entirely from the perspective of the human crew, and the audience shares in their ignorance the whole time, the finer details are irrelevant for the purposes of the story - all we know is that the thing is a very real and immediate threat which must be safeguarded against at all times.
    • What's the point of a viral pandemic?
    • Viruses' whole purpose for existsance is to make new viruses. The Thing is a very virulent, very complex, even intelligent virus.
      • The Thing is not a virus. More like an a bacteria or amoeba. Each one is a highly complex cell. At the very least, they're acting like any invasive organism does when introduced to an environment with no natural predators. Essentially assimilation is a combination of feeding (eating the dead cells from the organism) and reproduction (turning the live cells into more Things). So, global assimilation would simply be a means of them doing what any other life form would do.
      • The Thing is clearly a virus. Cells cannot absorb genes or alter DNA without using viruses or plasmids and since it's obviously pathogenic it must be a virus. If it weren't a virus then it would be eating and replacing cells which would not allow it to assimilate genes or retain the memories of its victims. It's clear that The Thing infects a host with its DNA using viruses generated from infected cells while (like many real viruses) preserving and altering the function of those cells to increase its longevity and pathogenicity. It's not out of the question that some portion of the genetically altered (by The Thing's viral DNA) change into some specialized "bacteria or amoeba" Thing-Cell to facilitate viral proliferation in the host however.
    • We don't know that the Things would assimilate the entire world. That's solely based on Blair's ideas. It could be that they don't like Earth and just want to get the hell off the planet...
      • That doesn't follow logically. While it's still possible the Thing's motive was something other than total assimilation the evidence points heavily in that direction. After all, if it just wanted to go home then why bother assimilating the dogs, which drew attention to it? Analysis of the movie indicates that Palmer or Norris was assimilated before the kennel scene, which would mean there was no tangible benefit to assimilating the dogs beyond a predatory instinct.
    • The ship in the opening sequence seems to be in distress. It's flying erratically and sounds like it's having trouble. Granted, this is a completely alien ship, so that could just be how it sounds and flies normally. But given that it landed in the most in hospitable place on the planet, it would appear that it was not deliberate. It's really only dumb luck that the Thing was ever excavated. Once it was, it set about consuming everything it could, apparently for no other reason than "that's what it does." That having been said, this troper was always under the impression that Blair!Thing was building a mini-spaceship to travel away from Earth, but the last few times I've watched it, I've come to believe it was building just a travel vehicle to get it to a more hospitable climate so it could replicate, not that it was trying to leave Earth.
      • Another popular theory among fan sis that the crash was very deliberate, the crew of the spaceship having experienced a similar situation onboard as what ensues in the rest of the movie, and an alien Mc Ready type crash landed in the coldest place it could find to keep the nightmare trapped.
  • My one and only beef with the movie: The Norwegians could have shot the dog pretty easily if the pilot had flown his helicopter like a helicopter, and not like an airplane that can't, you know, hover.
    • Sure, I bet it'd be easy to shoot a target of that size from a machine several metres above, struggling against Antarctic winds.
    • The dog was assimilated. Shooting him honestly wouldn't do anything more than either piss him off, or slow him down a little. Originally, they had a scene with Clark mending a bullet wound and mentioning how lucky it was that he survived being shot. It was cut out for pacing reasons. Presumably, they were hoping to incapacitate him so they could thrown kerosene and Thermite grenades on him.
    • They weren't exactly thinking straight at that point, and the prequel shows the the actual pilot of the helicopter had no real idea why the hell Lars wanted to kill that dog so badly.
  • My brother and I were watching the movie today and we both have one major beef with one part in this movie: When you see some Norwegians in a helicopter going after a dog with guns, kerosene and grenades, wouldn't you figure that there was something wrong with this 'dog' and just end its life?
    • They probably figured the Norwegians (who had up to that point shot at a dog, blew themselves up with grenades, and shot at the Americans, accidentally or otherwise) were deranged and that they needed to be stopped before they do anymore harm.
    • The dog was behaving perfectly innocently at the time. Its first reaction, upon seeing the American crew, was to run up to them and start licking them. The Norwegians, on the other hand, seemed completely crazy and out of control. I can see why the latter would come off as the ones who had something "wrong" with them.
    • Note that the Norwegian who blew up the helicopter was actually planning on blowing up the guys standing around the dog. That is not behavior that screams "the dog is sick or something and we're trying to save you!". It screams "we're sick or something and trying to kill you!".
  • At one point Norris was left alone and in charge of three of the cast (Copper, Garry and Clark) who were tied up, doped up and helpless to resist. A few minutes later, Norris was revealed as a Thing. The rest of the movie shows that none of the three was secretly a Thing. Why didn't Norris just take advantage of the situation and inject them with some of his Thing cells (using the hypodermic that he used to give them the morphine) and turn them into Things?
    • He would have been the only non-tied-down person there at what the others would conclude was the only time in which they could have been infected. It would have exposed him.
    • The same reason that dog was alone with Clark and didn't assimilate him: The Things can probably tell who's a high-risk target. The men were already under suspicion. And Clark was the most obvious candidate for assimilation, even to the humans.
  • This is one that Spoony brought up, and it's a good one: While it's cool that Blair is building his own flying saucer in the basement, what would it have run on? Gasoline?
    • In the Campbell short story, the Thing has used its leisure time to whip up not only an anti-gravity machine but a pocket-sized atomic generator to power it.
      • Spoony is wrong and that short story is unrealistic (where did he get the nuclear material required for the generator? to say nothing about the exotic tech required to cancel gravity) fact is, they never once use the word space ship - all they say is that it's a flying machine cannibalized with parts from the helicopter. Best guess it was designed to fly him to a nearby country - nothing more nothing less. So yes, he probably could power it on gasoline.
    • I've always pictured the mini-ship as more along the lines of a high-speed sled. Just something to either get to the ocean, or outside of the range where the humans could safely travel. The humans no longer have any dogs, or a working helicopter. All they have is the snow cat, which would be slower than walking. And they can't really walk very far in the Antarctic winter. Also, they were using kerosene, not gasoline to power the generator, snowcat, and chopper. The back of the rocket sled looks very much as one would expect the back of a rocket sled to look: Like that's where the flames come out of. They don't need to get into space with it, or even to another country. Just far away enough that the humans can't follow, and then shift back into a dog and jump into the ocean, where they can assimilate all life on earth from.
      • That wouldn't work, the Thing is quite susceptible to getting frozen.
    • Who says the Blair-thing was necessarily building a means to travel? Perhaps it was building a device to excavate and repair the original crashed ship.
  • Now, I'm no expert, and I've only seen pictures of Antarctica, but are there even mountains made of visible rock there? I was under the impression the everything above sea level was nothing but solid ice, but at the start of the film there are sweeping shots of mountains. So, am I wrong, or did the filmmakers muck up?
    • There certainly are mountains in Antarctica. Indeed, one of the reasons the base existed is for geological research, so naturally it was established near exposed rock.
    • There are some parts of the movie that were necessary goof-ups, too. They couldn't fly everyone down to Antarctica and film down there, so they flew them to Alaska and filmed there. They had enough problems with filming in the cold in Alaska. Antarctica is much colder, more inhospitable, and further away. Plus, if something broke down or someone got hurt, they'd be in big trouble down there. It's routine for those stationed in Antarctica to completely lose contact with the outside world for up to a month or so at a time. Other minor goofs included the time of day. Most fans of the movie don't know enough about Antarctica to pick up on these goofs. Just the nitpickers.
  • If each individual Thing acts independently of each other, and another Thing is just as likely to kill a previous Thing as a human, then why do they bother to infect more people and turn them into Things? What does it gain from this?
    • The Things are in it for their own survival. It's similar to why villains team up: because they stand more of a chance to survive by cooperating, most of the time. If another Thing (or Thing colony) is screwing up their chances of survival, or just getting in the way, they'll kill them. Individually, each Thing cell may only be as smart as an ant. But they have the ability to form hive minds to become smarter. The general perception is that the bigger a Thing colony (body) is, the smarter they can be. Note that the Norris Head Thing acts rather stupid, compared to the other Things. It just runs out into the open. Palmer Thing, seeing a chance to make itself look more human, points out the stupid Norris Head Thing, thus ensuring his own survival for longer and lowering any suspicions the others may have about him. Really, it's one of the ways that they're not so different from humans.
  • So... Is there any hints as to who the Thing is or isn't at the end?
    • The debate ranges on. Some say yes, others say no.
    • Carpenter states that originally, Mac was supposed to survive and prove that he was human with another blood test. But that ending was too upbeat, so they scrapped it in favor of the ambiguous ending.
      • There's also the infamous alternate ending, which makes it a moot point. Dog Thing lives...
      • Here's my reasoning. If both were Things, then why would they need to have that little chat? Mission accomplished, just wait for the rescue party. If one of them was the Thing, then wouldn't it try to assimilate the other, since neither had any weapons to defend themselves with? That only leaves the "both are human" variant.'
      • Neither had weapons? Did you miss the flamethrower Childs was packing?
      • The 2002 video game sequel (which actually IS canon) reveals that Childs died and MacReady mysteriously vanished.
      • Mac actually shows up at the end of the game in a helicopter, to assist you in fighting the final boss. Also, most people who watch the movie think it should stand on its own, independent of the other media.
    • This troper thinks that at the very least, it's exceedingly unlikely that Mac is a Thing, since only a few minutes at most could have passed between him blowing up Blair-Thing and reuniting with Childs, especially since the last thing we saw him do was run away from Blair-Thing.
    • The prequel revealed that the Thing can't copy inorganic material. Childs still has his metal ear stud in the final scene, suggesting that he at least is still human.
      • Except that movie also shows that the Thing is able to replace earrings. Carter does it, just with the wrong ear. Maybe it wasn't holding the Idiot Ball this time.
    • Here's some Fridge Horror for you. Earlier in the movie, MacReady was warned that it was possible for just one cell of the The Thing to infect an entire person, and everyone should prepare their own meals and only eat out of cans. At the end, MacReady hands Childs a bottle of whisky. When Childs takes a drink, MacReady chuckles. . .
    • Or maybe he's just laughing over Childs accepting the drink at all since Childs had been acting very antagonistic towards him during the film. That doesn't necessarily indicate he could be the the Thing.
  • When MacReady goes to check on Blair, there is a noose hanging in the shack. Yet Blair tells MacReady that he's fine and wants to return back and he's also infected by the alien. So what the hell?
    • This was roleplaying by Blair thing, in the original script Blair says that he will hang himself before the monster breaks in to absorb him.
    • For all we know, Blair actually did hang himself, and the Thing just ate the body and left the noose where it was.
    • Unlikely. The Thing doesn't seem to try and imitate dead corpses, which implies it can only do it to living beings. It's likely either Blair was assimilated before he could hang himself or the Thing put it up for the role play mentioned above. Besides, since the others are under the impression Blair is crazy, it doesn't seem to out of the question for them to not comment on there being a noose.
  • In the "blood test" scene how the hell did the Thing!blood scream when stabbed with a needle?
    • The scene was generated with a monster puppet(which you can see if you look really closely). Presumably, upon being burned, the blood briefly took on a more animal shape in order to escape.
      • Yes, but even so it didn't look more complex than an amoeba. Did it even have anything to scream with?
    • It could have been vibrating. It looked to me like some sort of cup or bladder, which could have affected a plain hum and turned it into something resembling an unearthly shriek.
  • Up until MacReady tested his own blood with the hot wire, it seemed like everyone was treated him as practically above suspicion for being infected, as though the suspicion that he was insane (and human) overpowered the suspicion that he was an alien. What little I saw of "generic suspicion that could be alien-suspicion" was pretty subtle, if it even was there. This is especially highlighted when nobody challenges his statement that he knows he's not a Thing (because obviously, that's exactly what an infectee would say). Did I miss something completely obvious?
    • Er, did you miss the bit where Nauls abandons him in a storm after finding a tattered jacket with MacReady's name on it? Which then causes everyone else to think he's been infected and lock him outside? The only reason they let him back inside and start going along with what he's saying is because he's got a flare in one hand and dynamite in the other and is threatening to blow up the whole base if they don't.
  • What's the practical applications of flamethrowers in the Antarctic? Do they use them to melt paths or thaw machinery or something?
    • Pretty much. Mostly thawing machinery and pipes out.
  • How did they obtain the blood from Palmer without getting a reaction from the Thing?
    • Because the intelligence of the thing depends on its size: Palmer-Thing was clever enough not to react, the blood-thing wasn't.
  • Could the Thing have come up with a way to withstand fire? There are plenty of single-celled organisms that are able to survive the harshest environments, including volcanoes. If the thing were to assimilate those organisms, would it have been able to tolerate the heat?
    • I don't think so. The thing is a imitator of function and looks mainly, it copies biological structures but it's flesh remains "Thing". Let's say an alien creature developed skin that would allow it to survive inside a volcano. The Thing imitating it would have skin that looks exactly like that creature, but ultimately the skin would be composed of the same Thing-flesh that is vulnerable to heat.
    • Tolerating environmental temperatures up to the boiling point is a far cry from tolerating actual combustion in action. Bizarre though it is, the Thing's structure is clearly made up partially of water, like ours; if it wasn't, it wouldn't have thawed out or frozen solid at the same temperatures that would freeze or thaw normal tissue. Get it hot enough, its cellular fluids are going to vaporize faster than its shapeshifting can heal the damage.
  • What happens if the thing were to assimilate a flamingo? The flamingo gets its pink color by eating algae and crustaceans containing carotenoids that break down into pink and orange pigments that are distributed across its body. Would the Thing-flamingo also assimilate those pigments and become pink itself? Additionally, the second movie pointed out that the Thing is incapable of absorbing non-organic matter (such as metal tooth fillings), but there is an animal called an Crysomallon squamiferum whose shell is covered in an additional layer of iron sulfides greigite and pyrite, which no animal in nature has been known to use. It's "foot" is also covered in iron-mineral scales to provide further protection against predators. Basically its a snail covered in metal. So if the thing were to absorb that would it expel the iron and spit out a regular non-iron covered Crysomallon squamiferum, or would the complete integration of metal and flesh confuse the Thing so much that it wouldn't be able to make anything at all? Remember the victim's fillings were put in with surgery at some point in his life, so they're not a part of the individual, but the snail developed the armor naturally by absorbing it from the sulfide and metal rich waters near the hypothermal vents deep beneath the ocean.
    • I would think it could imitate the organic material, but who knows. Considering the Thing never left Antarctica, I'd suggest not thinking too much about it.
    • It didn't have any trouble mimicking bone or teeth, so it presumably has some ability to work with mineral compounds. Pure metals might be beyond its range, else you'd think it would have armored up for protection when people were firing flamethrowers at it.
  • Near the end, before Nauls wonders off to his death, why didn't he say anything to MacReady first?
    • This was probably the relic of the cut scene where Nauls is ambushed by a jack-in-the-box monster, or this could simply be blamed on being a Too Dumb to Live moment out of fear.
    • Watching it again, he would have (in theory) never been out of MacReady's direct line-of-sight down there. Sure, he should have told MacReady he was heading in that direction, but it's only through horror-movie Behind the Black logic he disappears anyway. Mac should probably have seen him get caught.
  • Why did the Thing turn into a giant monster near the end when it could have more easily ran up to Mac Ready and do the thing he did to Garry?
    • While there was nothing official, theories posted in some fanfics range from the monster form was the Thing attempting different ways of communication and approaches (disguising myself didn't work, I'll try being horrifying) to a distraction while one of the Things escape ("I'll make what they expect: a monster for them to fight. It will buy me time to bury myself in the snow").
  • Quick hypothetical; Can the Thing assimilate Viruses and Cellular Material outside the Cell? We know it assimilates Cellular material, but we've never seen it absorb more basic life then even a cell. If it can assimilate Viruses and Cellular Material, how does that work? And if it can't, can a virus kill The Thing?
    • Only if it was a virus from its environment of origin, specifically adapted to infect Things. Viruses have to interact with specific cellular gateways and protein components to operate, and if the Thing's cells lack those components (which tend to be taxon-specific), then the virus has no way to affect them.
  • If MacReady and Childs in the end admit the possibility that one of them could be infected, isn't the obvious solution to burn themselves? I understand that's a tall order, but they were resigned to dying anyway, and if they just freeze, and one of them IS infected, then it was all for naught, and the world is still in mortal danger.
    • What would be the point? Either they are both human, and both get a painful burning death, or one of them is the Thing, in which case it isn't going to sit by and let itself get burned.
  • So if both Garry and Cooper weren't infected, then how DID the Thing get into the blood supply?
    • If you listen closely in the scene where Windows walks in on Bennings getting assimilated, you can hear him drop the keys. The most popular theory is that Norris, Palmer or Blair picked them up at this time. Blair had apparently locked himself in his room at this time, so it would have been the perfect opportunity to sabotage the blood, before going on to killing the dogs and destroying the vehicles.
  • Couldn't they have used a variation of Copper's blood test even without the uncontaminated blood? For example, they could have taken a sample of each person's blood, then mixed them with each other, one by one, and find the Thing through process of elimination. Eventually they'd find that Palmer and Norris's blood samples are the only ones that react strangely with other blood samples (except for when Palmer's is mixed with Norris's blood). That would single them out as the odd ones out.
    • They wanted the stored blood because it was the only blood they could be 100% certain wasn't already infected. Mixing two blood samples and seeing no reaction wouldn't necessarily exonerate someone if both sources' identity was in doubt: it would only indicate they were both human or both Things.
    • If the test were to work as they theorized though, then they would be able to conclude that 2 of the men (Palmer and Norris, assuming Blair is still human) are the odd ones out. As in, they are either the only two humans among Things, or they are two Things surrounded by humans. Since as Mac concludes "if you were all Things, you'd just attack me by now" (in other words, if the Things were the majority, they'd kill the minority) the logical thing to do would be to lock up Palmer and Norris until they can come up with a final test. Hypothetically, Gary and Copper (prime suspects) would match up with the rest of the humans, which might cast doubt on them to an outside observer. But the humans KNOW they are human (Mac: "I know I'm human") and they are in control.
  • Another thing: If the Thing blood actually takes over other blood, which in turn takes over other blood, then it would be trivial to find out who's the thing.
    • Would you want to just let the possibility of an alien imitating and killing people running around slide? I think not. Besides, there's nothing preventing doing the blood test that Mac came up with.
  • When Blair is dissecting the Dog Thing. He cuts it open somewhere and pulls... something out. The thing he pulls out causes him to say "Oh my God". What exactly did he pull out? What are we supposed to be looking at in that scene? Also, how many dogs were there in that Thing body, in addition to the original dog?
    • Watching that scene, he was pulling out a dog that wasn't fully absorbed due to the teeth and nose and he actually says "Oh my God as he's cutting. On the topic of the dogs, there were 6 before the Thing got inside while two got out and the rest were absorbed and their remains can be seen during Blair's discussion.
  • Why wasn't Clarke assimilated? I've heard fans of the movie say that he wasn't chosen because he would be under a lot of suspicion. But that doesn't make any sense. Even if Clarke was under a lot of suspicion, why wouldn't the Thing take him over anyway? The Thing doesn't lose anything from assimilating someone. So what does it matter to Dog Thing if Clarke Thing would be a high risk target? At best, Team-Thing will have another ally who could possibly assimilate even more; if he gets caught, team human will lose an ally. Either way Dog Thing wins.
    • The suspicion thing is pretty self-explanatory. Why take over someone who is a prime suspect? Clarke is a high risk target and it would probably be too much risk and danger taking over someone who is likely to be killed. It would merely make it a waster of time for the Thing to take over someone they'd suspect first. Note how the people the Thing takes, Bennings, Norris, and Palmer, are pretty low key characters throughout the movie. If anything, the Thing stands the best chance taking over people that are the last ones you'd suspect because no one expects them to secretly be murderous aliens and look how it ended up for Doc in particular.
    • (OP here) This would apply IF the Thing had anything to lose from assimilating someone. The Thing has absolutely nothing to lose from taking someone over. Besides possibly getting caught in the process, which was not an issue with Clarke. If it takes over Clark, and now Clarke is a suspect, so what? The humans can't do anything about it. The most they will do is tie him up and be cautious around him; they wouldn't burn him unless they could PROVE he was the Thing. And by the time they DO have a way to determine who is the Thing, it doesn't make a lick of difference whether they are a low key or a high risk target at all; they are going to get caught, as seen with Palmer. The only thing it loses is that since it is being watched, it won't be able to go around camp assimilating or framing people (which is not a problem, it can use Blair, Palmer and Norris to do that).
      • While I do agree with you OP, I always kind of thought that the point was the Thing was trying to make it seem like nothing was going on beyond paranoia. If the most obvious person in the group turns out to be a normal human and is eventually killed by other humans it could pretend this whole thing was just a bunch of paranoia getting the best of people. Then it could waltz back to civilization with the rest of them eventually.
      • Good point, I didn't think of that before. The only thing is, we KNOW they know the Thing exists, because of the scene with the dogs, and more importantly the scene where Bennings is assimilated. Although at that point they don't have any good evidence that the Thing can perfectly assimilate a human being so that theory can still fly.
  • The way the men reacted to the Thing always bugged me. When Doc Copper sees the Norwegian Thing, all he says is "Is that a man in there...?" with a confused expression on his face, as if he can't see the horrific monstrosity right in front of him. And when the Norwegian Thing is brought back to the Outpost, and everyone gets a good look at it, they all seem a bit too comfortable standing right next to it, even breathing in the smoke fumes that it emits. If someone in real life saw that, you'd expect them to at least back away, if not run straight out of the room, and/or start vomiting on the spot.
    • Granted, there are some people reacting badly to the smell and people have different limits on what makes them actually puke, considering I for one didn't throw up throughout the movie, but found it disgusting.
  • Why does the Norris-Thing have two heads? The one that is the head on the top of the torso and one that appears from the chest mouth. Is the chest mouth head the original Norris' that the Thing simply didn't digest or something?
    • If you watch the scene carefully, the thing that comes out of Norris's torso actually seems to be a separate Thing, detaching itself from the original body and latching itself on the ceiling, similar to how the Norris-Head is its own organism. The separate creature could have formed the head as a central brain along with eyes, and just reused the Norris head formula because it was more familiar with it/could easily access it. If it hadn't have digested the head then presumably it wouldn't have been able to imitate it.
      • There's also nothing saying that each individual Thing entity is only one creature. With how active the Thing's blood itself is when separated it's always led me to think that the Thing could, in a pinch, break up into dozens of pieces of it wanted to. So I assumed that this was just the Thing splitting up so it could maximize the chances of surviving after outing itself.
  • Would a Thing version of someone weigh differently to the original? It's implied that the method of assimilation is that the Thing eats humans, then converts their cells into Thing cells. But there's also the scene where the Norweigan Thing "jumps" into Bennings's body. Even if he looked the same, it seems likely that his body would be denser and weigh more because it's the Thing cells added onto the human cells.
    • I don't think it would matter too much as cells are literally microscopic and considering Bennings was caught before it was finished, it can be noticed it has deformed and extra long arms. I think it's likely as a big collection of cells that can operate on their own the Thing could distribute its weight and any size differentiation would be minuscule as humans have cells die and get replaced constantly so it should be no worry.
      • The whole human body consists of the cells and there are millions of them - so a change in weight of one cell would make a ton of a difference if all the cells were affected the same way. So we could only assume that the change is minuscule even on the level of the single cell.
  • Here's one I'm surprised no-one's asked before; what's with all the guns (And explosives, for that matter)? I've heard explanations for the flamethrower that sound semi-plausible, but why are there so many firearms in a research facility? Not just the American camp- the Norwegian one as well, they're loaded with guns. Why? (I'm hoping for a Watsonian answer, here- I get the Doylist explanation was that it served the purposes of furthering the plot.)
    • Under the Antarctic Treaty, Antarctic research stations are to be used for peaceful scientific purposes only. But the stations were established during the height of the Cold War, so it's not inconceivable that they would have weapons on hand just in case the Soviets decided to start something.
  • How does the assimilation of Bennings work? Windows walks in and sees him being assimilated and we know this is the original Bennings because he's sitting on a chair and has his original pants on. He leaves and returns with Mac and Fuchs in what can't be more than 5 minutes, and Bennings-Thing has escaped, is fully clothed and almost fully assimilated at that point. How did the Thing assimilate him so fast? Did Norweigian-Thing absorb chair-Bennings then spit out an assimilation in less than 5 minutes? Also, did it pull up a chair for him before doing so?
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Headscratchers/TheThing1982