Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Headscratchers / Stargate

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


I just watched that scene for the first time in years. Everyone seems to think that Daniel was written off for saying crazy things about aliens building the pyramids. However, he actually only says that the pyramids were built years before the current assumed date. An audience member asks who he thinks built them, and Daniel replies that he doesn't know. This causes everyone to get up and leave. Why the hell would that cause them to leave? Presumably, he sent word out about this seminar, "Hey guys, I have some new theories about the date of Egyptian pyramid construction. Come hear me talk about them." Again, it's very likely that he wouldn't be putting his reputation on the line if he didn't have evidence. But the audience leaves before he can present anything. He states his thesis: the pyramids were built years earlier than we assumed. An audience member asks a question: who does he (Daniel) think built them. Daniel says he doesn't know and that somehow destroys his credibility.An argument could be made that this isn't the first time he's come out with a crazy theory, and this is just the end of the line. But that was a pretty large crowd. If most people had written him off, they wouldn't be there.

to:

* I just watched that scene for the first time in years. Everyone seems to think that Daniel was written off for saying crazy things about aliens building the pyramids. However, he actually only says that the pyramids were built years before the current assumed date. An audience member asks who he thinks built them, and Daniel replies that he doesn't know. This causes everyone to get up and leave. Why the hell would that cause them to leave? Presumably, he sent word out about this seminar, "Hey guys, I have some new theories about the date of Egyptian pyramid construction. Come hear me talk about them." Again, it's very likely that he wouldn't be putting his reputation on the line if he didn't have evidence. But the audience leaves before he can present anything. He states his thesis: the pyramids were built years earlier than we assumed. An audience member asks a question: who does he (Daniel) think built them. Daniel says he doesn't know and that somehow destroys his credibility.An argument could be made that this isn't the first time he's come out with a crazy theory, and this is just the end of the line. But that was a pretty large crowd. If most people had written him off, they wouldn't be there.




to:

** The academic community can be extremely unkind to anyone that dares to go against what's accepted knowledge, and it's pretty much always been that way. You have to be able to club people over the head with the reality of your theory, even that doesn't always work, and Daniel basically just had a half-formed hypothesis. It's surprising they only walked out instead of burning him at the stake as a heretic.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Why would he need guards there? He wasn't expecting anyone he didn't know to come through. He's the absolute ruler of the place, after all.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:


[[WMG:Why Didn't Ra Post Guards at the Abydos Stargate Terminal?]]
* Abydos was a rather important world, and it makes no sense for Ra to ''not'' post a guard detail there. It was not as if logistics would have been a problem (the guards could be supplied by the Stargate from Ra's throneworld or his other worlds.)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** The novelisation, though differing in several points, indicated that Dr. Jackson was already disgraced after publishing a number of controversial research papers. The presentation was arranged by one of his old colleagues as an opportunity to rebuild his reputation, but as we saw that didn't go so well.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** I agree here. I also recently watched the movie again for the first time in years (I got the first season of Stargate SG-1 out of the library and I wanted a refresher before getting started), and I felt the same way bout this scene. They aren't even letting a fellow academic state his case. To take a stab at a WildMassGuessing though, maybe this theory was the ElephantInTheLivingRoom that every other academic was avoiding like the plague.

to:

** I agree here. I also recently watched the movie again for the first time in years (I got the first season of Stargate SG-1 Series/StargateSG1 out of the library and I wanted a refresher before getting started), and I felt the same way bout this scene. They aren't even letting a fellow academic state his case. To take a stab at a WildMassGuessing though, maybe this theory was the ElephantInTheLivingRoom that every other academic was avoiding like the plague.



*** Also, in the movie, Abydos and Earth are supposed to be in separate galaxies. That's one hell of a road trip if you've got other things to do. Maybe Ra decided to avert HonorBeforeReason and write Earth off as not worth the trouble? Even on StargateAtlantis, traveling to another galaxy by relatively conventional means doesn't become practical without the help of technology considerably more sufficiently advanced than what the Goa'uld have access to.

to:

*** Also, in the movie, Abydos and Earth are supposed to be in separate galaxies. That's one hell of a road trip if you've got other things to do. Maybe Ra decided to avert HonorBeforeReason and write Earth off as not worth the trouble? Even on StargateAtlantis, Series/StargateAtlantis, traveling to another galaxy by relatively conventional means doesn't become practical without the help of technology considerably more sufficiently advanced than what the Goa'uld have access to.



Yes, yes, ''{{Stargate SG-1}}'' shows a DHD on Abydos. But: one, in the movie the concept of a DHD was never even mentioned; and two, even the series didn't particularly bother to explain this, saying that they dug up the device later.

to:

Yes, yes, ''{{Stargate SG-1}}'' ''Series/StargateSG1'' shows a DHD on Abydos. But: one, in the movie the concept of a DHD was never even mentioned; and two, even the series didn't particularly bother to explain this, saying that they dug up the device later.



*** It's mentioned several times in ''Stargate SG-1'' that destroying a gate is very difficult, as they naturally absorb any energy directed at them. Even a single nuke might not do it. That is why they have to build those Mark IX Gatebusters, which are basically naquadah-enhanced nukes. Then you got ''Series/StargateUniverse'' gates which can be taken out by a rogue plasma bolt.

to:

*** It's mentioned several times in ''Stargate SG-1'' ''Series/StargateSG1'' that destroying a gate is very difficult, as they naturally absorb any energy directed at them. Even a single nuke might not do it. That is why they have to build those Mark IX Gatebusters, which are basically naquadah-enhanced nukes. Then you got ''Series/StargateUniverse'' gates which can be taken out by a rogue plasma bolt.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** Actually, the smallest nuclear bomb ever made (so far) was for the Davy Crockett, which is essentially a nuclear bazooka. It lobbed warheads with a yield which equal 10-20 tons of TNT.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* That scene wasn't in the theatrical release, only the extended addition. Consider it a deleted scene. Or you could always say that Ra changed the design of the Anubis guard helmet sometime in the past 10,000 years.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* Another possible explanation: The Stargate dials 7 symbols for a normal gate address, however it has 9 actual chevrons. Dialing in with six symbols would not yield a stable wormhole and without the correct translation guessing the last three symbols would be alot more daunting for the team.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[WMG: What was that "fossil" anyways]]
It looked like a snarling canid head cast from molten metal. The Anubis guard's helmet was no where near that toothy.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** According to the novelization, one of the older kids leads the others out before the ship takes off.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[WMG:All those dead kids.]]
* Early in the movie, O'Neil has a chance to shoot Ra with a stolen energy spear (or whatever you call those weapons), but doesn't take the shot because Ra's all-child entourage forms a HumanShield in front of him and O'Neil WouldntHurtAChild. OK, then. So what about at the end of the movie, when O'Neil teleports the nuke onto Ra's ship? All the kids are still there (or, at least, [[WhatHappenedToTheMouse we didn't see them leaving]]). [[FridgeHorror Oops?]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The rational offered was that Daniel needed to decipher the symbols on the destination stargate and allow the team to return home. That could have been accomplished simply by opening the stargate on a regular schedule from the Earth side. The recon team could simply return to the stargate at the conclusion of their mission, wait for it to open and return to Earth. They've already demonstrated that they could open the stargate at will.

to:

The rational rationale offered was that Daniel needed to decipher the symbols on the destination stargate and allow the team to return home. That could have been accomplished simply by opening the stargate on a regular schedule from the Earth side. The recon team could simply return to the stargate at the conclusion of their mission, wait for it to open and return to Earth. They've already demonstrated that they could open the stargate at will.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** Agreed. The ancient Egyptians may not have had a word for "atom", but the Goa'uld would've had to in order to develop their technology.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

*** They didn't know how it worked, for all they knew it was rigged to explode if you put the wrong code in to many times.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** It's mentioned several times in ''Stargate SG-1'' that destroying a gate is very difficult, as they naturally absorb any energy directed at them. Even a single nuke might not do it. That is why they have to build those Mark IX Gatebusters, which are basically naquadah-enhanced nukes. Then you got ''StargateUniverse'' gates which can be taken out by a rogue plasma bolt.

to:

*** It's mentioned several times in ''Stargate SG-1'' that destroying a gate is very difficult, as they naturally absorb any energy directed at them. Even a single nuke might not do it. That is why they have to build those Mark IX Gatebusters, which are basically naquadah-enhanced nukes. Then you got ''StargateUniverse'' ''Series/StargateUniverse'' gates which can be taken out by a rogue plasma bolt.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** And there numerous precedents of mankind [[{{Nohamotyo}} forgetting things after a few short years]], not to mention several millennia. Julia Roberts was almost Mrs. Keifer Sutherland in the early 1990's. How many people remember that fact?

to:

** And there numerous precedents of mankind [[{{Nohamotyo}} [[FleetingDemographicRule forgetting things after a few short years]], not to mention several millennia. Julia Roberts was almost Mrs. Keifer Sutherland in the early 1990's. How many people remember that fact?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** It's probably a failsafe in the technology, ensuring a proper link up between the stargates.

Added: 791

Changed: 32

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

[[WMG:Need for point of origin]]
* ''Why'', exactly, does the Stargate need a Point of Origin? Using the telephone metaphor the series is so fond of, each gate connected to the network should be aware of its own address, and thus where the wormhole is originating from.
** A FridgeBrilliance answer: It's not telling the 'gate where it is, it's telling the 'gate when to engage – like the "Send" button on a cell phone. Granted, it's only relevant when the [[spoiler: eight-chevron addresses]] come into play, but still.
** Unrelated question: Why do you require someone to translate the cover, if you've translated the other six symbols and there are only 36 possible answers? Much like the Show, it doesn't take a very long time to Dial the gate. Just test them all.
*** It might not take a long time, but it's ''expensive''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Jack doesn't necessarily know how the bomb ''works''. He's a soldier, not a scientist. Besides, he just got over his suicidal funk, he's probably not looking forward to doing something that translates into a long, painful death for him and whoever else ever decides to go in there for the next 30 years.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** Loath as I am to use SG=1 Logic when examining the film, the show does make it clear that a gate will retain enough power for one outward dial after being disconnected from the DHD.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:


[[WMG:Why didn't O'Neill shoot or smash the nuke when he couldn't deactivate it?]]

Since nuclear weapons are precisely calibrated instruments with many safeguards to prevent an accidental or premature detonation, it's more accurate to think of them as "going on" rather than "going off." Shooting it with a staff weapon or finding some other way to break it would prevent it from detonating, though it would spray radioactive material all over the room. That seems preferable, given the alternative, yet it looks like he's out of ideas right before they use the ring transporter.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Also, it's very likely that Ra was using the phrase "hundred fold" as a figure of speech, and not as a literal reference to an exact calculation - ancient peoples were known for using flowery expressions that just indicated something was big/copious without giving a precise figure, and I can totally picture Ra saying something similar like "my wrath shall burn with the fury of ten thousand suns", meaning it in the metaphorical sense.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

**** If you've seen the extended cut, they DID know there's a serious threat to earth on the other side, in the form of fossilized Anubis guards that were discovered with the gate.

Added: 824

Changed: 784

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* The prehistoric Egyptians likely already believed in Ra the mythical god. When the alien being abducted his host he learned their culture and assumed the identity of the god at the top of their pantheon. The rebels probably figured that this wasn't the "real" Ra and once they overthrew the alien tyrant they went back to worshiping the sun like they did in the past.



* They knew what the Stargate was supposed to do but had no idea how it operated. In the series it's revealed to work like a telephone but for all they knew it worked like a combination lock on a safe: enter the wrong sequence too many times and you're locked out for good. Or maybe it blows up to keep less advanced cultures from toying with it.




to:

* Daniel doesn't need to know that at all. The audience knows since we're given subtitles by that point in the movie, but Daniel might have been able to infer what the new word was. He hears Ra say, "You have advanced much, harnessed the power of (something)." while he looks down at the bomb. Daniel probably already figured out that was a nuclear weapon and reasoned Ra said "the atom" or "uranium" or "fission."


Added DiffLines:

** If it were a 5 megaton nuke (then it would be much bigger and heavier in real life, I know) then it would be 500 megatons going off inside a mountain. That would be 2 and a half times bigger than Krakatoa—and that's assuming the Stargate itself isn't enhancing the explosion along with the mineral—which is going to seriously impact the western US and cause a nuclear winter in the rest of the world. Not enough to destroy civilization on Earth, but it would hurt us a lot.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* Maybe he actually said "the smallest indivisible form of matter" or something along those lines. I don't remember how long that sentence was, though.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* No, they didn't. The Greek word just means "indivisible" and wouldn't have meant anything to most Greeks... especially because it was only a philosophical concept more or less unrelated to the current meaning (in fact, it directly contradicts the modern meaning). They might have had the word, but the only way it would have impressed her would have been as technobabble.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

*** The crowd also gets upset when he calls a presumably well-respected egyptologist a fraud.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Manually. Spin the ring and lock the chevrons. A power source is a different matter, as it is clearly mentioned that the DHD contains the power source.

to:

* Manually. Spin the ring and lock the chevrons. A power source is a different matter, as it is clearly mentioned in the TV Series that the DHD contains the power source.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

''If you are referring to something from the TV Series, please say so for the benefit of those who haven't seen the series yet.''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

*** Well, the ''Universe'' series gates are an earlier version of the others, so it might be from before they ironed out those particular details.

Top