Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Headscratchers / Seinfeld

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
adding information

Added DiffLines:

* In "The Frogger", George and Jerry go to the pizza place they used to frequent and discover that George's high score on ''VideoGame/{{Frogger}}'' has never been beaten. Since the pizza place is closing, George decides to buy the machine so that his achievement will last forever, but Jerry points out that the score will be lost when they unplug the game to move it. So, this pizza place has never had a power failure since George racked up his high score? [[note]] Furthermore, it's established on ''Series/MadAboutYou'' that it takes place in the same universe as ''Seinfeld'' and that show had an episode where Jamie blacked out the entire city. [[/note]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The trope is LaboriousLaziness. The trope of a lazy character unwittingly engaging in more effort to take the "lazy" route rather than the supposedly hard option is a common one in comedy.

to:

** The trope is LaboriousLaziness. The trope of a A lazy character unwittingly engaging in more effort to take the "lazy" route rather than the supposedly hard option is a common one in comedy.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Also, RuleOfFunny: it's just a CallBack to illustrate how dedicated the prosecution has been to find people who have been screwed over by the main characters somehow to testify.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** The trope is LaboriousLaziness. The trope of a lazy character unwittingly engaging in more effort to take the "lazy" route rather than the supposedly hard option is a common one in comedy.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** This actually does come up in Season 3's "The Letter". Jerry's artist girlfriend actually asks Kramer why Jerry's ex-girlfriend Elaine is always hanging around, and points out how weird that is.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Intellectually, probably, but they've probably never seen it in practice to this extent before.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* "The Glasses": Jerry and Elaine are baffled by how George can be so blind towards objects that are close to him but can supposedly spot things that are really far away. Are they not aware that far-sightedness (hyperopia) is a thing?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Also, remember that Elaine is not a NYC native as Jerry, George, and Kramer were. George's parents and Kramer's mom were still in NYC, and Jerry's parents were probably still in NYC until shortly before the series began. It stands to reason that your family will be a bigger part of your life if they live locally. It is possible that Elaine occasionally visits her parents in Baltimore but otherwise just isn't very close with them.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Also, well-off financially is relative. Jerry's probably doing okay for himself, but that doesn't mean he's a millionaire or anything close. Just because his real-life equivalent rakes in the big bucks doesn't mean that Jerry is as successful.

to:

** Also, well-off financially "well-off financially" is relative. Fictional Jerry's probably doing okay for himself, but that doesn't mean he's a millionaire or anything close. Just because his real-life equivalent rakes in the big bucks doesn't mean that Fictional Jerry is as successful.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Does anyone else find it a bit implausible that the vast majority of Jerry's girlfriends are totally cool with him spending so much time with his ex? For all the women Jerry has dated, there is a surprising lack of jealousy throughout the series of this woman he used to sleep with hanging around his apartment all the time. I understand the plot device would've gotten worn out if every one of Jerry's girlfriends had a problem with Elaine, but it seems odd that almost none of them had the slightest problem with her friendship with Jerry.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* [[RuleOfThree Another one about George]]: so, is he like the adult version of [[{{Peanuts}} Charlie Brown]]? I ask and put it that way because the happiness and confidence he gained from doing the opposite only seemed to last for that episode.

to:

* [[RuleOfThree Another one about George]]: so, is he like the adult version of [[{{Peanuts}} [[Franchise/{{Peanuts}} Charlie Brown]]? I ask and put it that way because the happiness and confidence he gained from doing the opposite only seemed to last for that episode.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Also, he could've blamed Jerry and Elaine for giving him 5-alarm chili that aggravated his gastrointestinal condition.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Also, Susan might have treated Marisa Tomei as a kind of "celebrity freebie" -- namely, letting it slide because a chance to sleep with a beautiful and famous celebrity would be a near-impossible opportunity for an otherwise mundane nobody like George to refuse. Chances are, if it was Susan and (say) George Clooney she would also have succumbed to temptation.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Also, well-off financially is relative. Jerry's probably doing okay for himself, but that doesn't mean he's a millionaire or anything close. Just because his real-life equivalent rakes in the big bucks doesn't mean that Jerry is as successful.


Added DiffLines:

** Also... it's George. He has a sense of entitlement that's incredibly out-of-whack.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Answered my own question: The character's name isn't Mario (despite what George calls him), but Sal, and is played by Sam Shamshak.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** As the Troper above points out, all logic and reason went out the window immediately when the restaurant refused to deliver the flounder to Elaine's apartment. It became a challenge for Elaine to get them to deliver it to her, whatever it took.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Maybe Kramer used a fake voice and name over the phone?

Added: 717

Changed: 106

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** I think the implication is that Newman is ''so'' desperate to see Jerry finally receive his comeuppance that he is willing to reduce himself to the status of a bum if he can be there. As mentioned above, Newman is probably unable to get other accommodation for whatever reason.



** Also, non-Jewish troper asking: isn't Hanukkah actually a relatively minor celebration in the Jewish holiday calendar? IIRC it's kind of been inflated a bit because of its close proximity to Christmas and gentiles assuming it has the same significance. So in that sense it might almost be a RealityIsUnrealistic thing; most of the characters don't make a big deal of it because Jewish people as a whole don't make a big deal of it (or at least not as big a deal as non-Jewish people assume they do).

to:

** Also, non-Jewish troper asking: isn't Hanukkah actually a relatively minor celebration in the Jewish holiday calendar? IIRC it's kind of been inflated a bit because of its close proximity to Christmas and gentiles assuming it has the same significance.significance or just kind of lumping it into the overall holiday celebrations in an attempt to be a bit more inclusive. So in that sense it might almost be a RealityIsUnrealistic thing; most of the characters don't make a big deal of it because Jewish people as a whole don't make a big deal of it (or at least not as big a deal as non-Jewish people assume they do).


Added DiffLines:

** Newman's kind of a dick himself, remember. He's simply the kind of person who would rather feel glee over a hated rival receiving a comeuppance than feel sorrow at a friend (and two people he's more or less neutral towards) receiving the same punishment.


Added DiffLines:

** Kramer is a bit of a KnowNothingKnowItAll throughout the series. It's not out of character for him to confidently hold forth on things that he doesn't really know much about.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** There's also the fact that this was the first case of this law being broken and it would be largely publicized, so it was said that they ''had'' to win this case, no matter what.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** This episode is on as this Troper types this, so there's the scene in the first episode of the two-parter where Jerry refuses to take Newman to Paris with them. Newman then goes on a somewhat maniacal rant about how Jerry's 'day' was coming where that his 'smug smirk' would be wiped off his face. He concludes this rant by saying that he would be there on this day, watching with jubilee as Jerry got what he had coming to him.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** NYC rent for starters. Jerry’s tiny apartment right in the heart of Manhattan probably would cost a lot more than it looks like realistically. Another reason is it’s not unexpected for somebody in show business to live well below their means. So yes, Jerry does make $50,000 for one gig, but he probably chooses to live in a cheap apartment just in case that one gig is all he has to survive in for a year.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Who played Mario (of Mario's Pizza) in "The Frogger"? Nobody is listed in the credits so whoever played the character was uncredited, but I have no idea who it is. Anybody know?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Jerry is implied in-universe to be extremely well-off financially. He seemingly has unlimited money, and is shown making $50,000 for one gig. So WHY is he living in an old, dilapidated one-bedroom apartment for the duration of the series? I love the apartment because it's the primary set for the series, but if you take it out of the Seinfeld universe, it looks like a starter flat for a broke 20-something. I find it hard to believe that a near-millionaire wouldn't be living in a condo on Park Avenue, or at least a house in the suburbs.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The producers are probably being a bit glib about the show literally being about 'nothing' (since, as it's not a Dadaist [[TheTropelessTale Tropeless Tale]], clearly it's not literally about nothing), but in addition to the points raised about the lack of clear cut moral lessons, the show's also about 'nothing' in the sense that what does happen is usually kind of mundane and banal. In a lot of sitcoms around the time (not all of them, but a lot of them), in each episode there's usually some kind of meaningful central event that informs the entire episode -- this week the characters are going to the prom; next week the characters are hosting a dinner party; the week after that the characters are going on vacation; and so on. Admittedly, ''Seinfeld'' isn't ''entirely'' free of these kind of things, but (particularly in the early seasons), most of the time episodes involve them just kind of dicking around fixating on things that are kind of trivial. This week, George plans a perfect comeback to someone who insulted him; next week, Jerry worries about the size of his girlfriend's hands; the week after that, Elaine gets into a petty feud with the guy who runs the soup restaurant she goes to for lunch; and so on. It's about 'nothing' in the sense that what happens in most of the episodes by most standards isn't really that important or significant.

to:

** The producers are probably being a bit glib about the show literally being about 'nothing' (since, as it's not a Dadaist [[TheTropelessTale [[JustForFun/TheTropelessTale Tropeless Tale]], clearly it's not literally about nothing), but in addition to the points raised about the lack of clear cut moral lessons, the show's also about 'nothing' in the sense that what does happen is usually kind of mundane and banal. In a lot of sitcoms around the time (not all of them, but a lot of them), in each episode there's usually some kind of meaningful central event that informs the entire episode -- this week the characters are going to the prom; next week the characters are hosting a dinner party; the week after that the characters are going on vacation; and so on. Admittedly, ''Seinfeld'' isn't ''entirely'' free of these kind of things, but (particularly in the early seasons), most of the time episodes involve them just kind of dicking around fixating on things that are kind of trivial. This week, George plans a perfect comeback to someone who insulted him; next week, Jerry worries about the size of his girlfriend's hands; the week after that, Elaine gets into a petty feud with the guy who runs the soup restaurant she goes to for lunch; and so on. It's about 'nothing' in the sense that what happens in most of the episodes by most standards isn't really that important or significant.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Even if they did, Kurt could still be charged with assaulting a police officer, which is a separate crime.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** She also likely exaggerated the nature of the relationship to portray herself as an innocent victim and George as a scheming predator. WoundedGazelleGambit and such.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The producers are probably being a bit glib about the show literally being about 'nothing' (since, as it's not a Dadaist TropelessTale, clearly it's not literally about nothing), but in addition to the points raised about the lack of clear cut moral lessons, the show's also about 'nothing' in the sense that what does happen is usually kind of mundane and banal. In a lot of sitcoms around the time (not all of them, but a lot of them), in each episode there's usually some kind of meaningful central event that informs the entire episode -- this week the characters are going to the prom; next week the characters are hosting a dinner party; the week after that the characters are going on vacation; and so on. Admittedly, ''Seinfeld'' isn't ''entirely'' free of these kind of things, but (particularly in the early seasons), most of the time episodes involve them just kind of dicking around fixating on things that are kind of trivial. This week, George plans a perfect comeback to someone who insulted him; next week, Jerry worries about the size of his girlfriend's hands; the week after that, Elaine gets into a petty feud with the guy who runs the soup restaurant she goes to for lunch; and so on. It's about 'nothing' in the sense that what happens in most of the episodes by most standards isn't really that important or significant.

to:

** The producers are probably being a bit glib about the show literally being about 'nothing' (since, as it's not a Dadaist TropelessTale, [[TheTropelessTale Tropeless Tale]], clearly it's not literally about nothing), but in addition to the points raised about the lack of clear cut moral lessons, the show's also about 'nothing' in the sense that what does happen is usually kind of mundane and banal. In a lot of sitcoms around the time (not all of them, but a lot of them), in each episode there's usually some kind of meaningful central event that informs the entire episode -- this week the characters are going to the prom; next week the characters are hosting a dinner party; the week after that the characters are going on vacation; and so on. Admittedly, ''Seinfeld'' isn't ''entirely'' free of these kind of things, but (particularly in the early seasons), most of the time episodes involve them just kind of dicking around fixating on things that are kind of trivial. This week, George plans a perfect comeback to someone who insulted him; next week, Jerry worries about the size of his girlfriend's hands; the week after that, Elaine gets into a petty feud with the guy who runs the soup restaurant she goes to for lunch; and so on. It's about 'nothing' in the sense that what happens in most of the episodes by most standards isn't really that important or significant.

Added: 1346

Changed: 210

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The producers are probably being a bit glib about the show literally being about 'nothing' (since, as it's not a Dadaist TropelessTale, clearly it's not literally about nothing), but in addition to the points raised about the lack of clear cut moral lessons, the show's also about 'nothing' in the sense that what does happen is usually kind of mundane and banal. In a lot of sitcoms around the time (not all of them, but a lot of them), in each episode there's usually some kind of meaningful central event that informs the entire episode -- this week the characters are going to the prom; next week the characters are hosting a dinner party; the week after that the characters are going on vacation; and so on. Admittedly, ''Seinfeld'' isn't ''entirely'' free of these kind of things, but (particularly in the early seasons), most of the time episodes involve them just kind of dicking around fixating on things that are kind of trivial. This week, George plans a perfect comeback to someone who insulted him; next week, Jerry worries about the size of his girlfriend's hands; the week after that, Elaine gets into a petty feud with the guy who runs the soup restaurant she goes to for lunch; and so on. It's about 'nothing' in the sense that what happens in most of the episodes by most standards isn't really that important or significant.



** Out-of-universe, Cranston could also have been required to wear particular styles or facial hair for other roles that he had; actors are sometimes contractually obliged to develop or keep a particular look for a character (usually if they're doing a recurring role like a theatre production or a starring/recurring role on a TV show) that they'll have to wear in other, smaller roles that they might also get during the production. So on some occasions Cranston might have had another role which, say, required him to have a beard and the ''Seinfeld'' producers were okay with him keeping it. In-universe, as above, Tim's probably just one of those people who's constantly trying out a new look.

to:

** Out-of-universe, Cranston could also have been required to wear particular styles or facial hair for other roles that he had; actors are sometimes contractually obliged to develop or keep a particular look for a character (usually if (if they're doing a recurring role like a nightly theatre production production, or a starring/recurring role on feature film where they might be called to set at irregular intervals over a TV show) period of months, and so on) that they'll have to wear in other, smaller roles that they might also get during the production. So on some occasions Cranston might have had another role which, say, required him to have a beard and the ''Seinfeld'' producers were okay with him keeping it. it since, hey, who cares if Jerry's dentist has a beard this time? In-universe, as above, Tim's probably just one of those people who's constantly trying out a new look.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Out-of-universe, Cranston could also have been required to wear particular styles or facial hair for other roles that he had; actors are sometimes contractually obliged to develop or keep a particular look for a character (usually if they're doing a recurring role like a theatre production or a starring/recurring role on a TV show) that they'll have to wear in other, smaller roles that they might also get during the production. So on some occasions Cranston might have had another role which, say, required him to have a beard and the ''Seinfeld'' producers were okay with him keeping it. In-universe, as above, Tim's probably just one of those people who's constantly trying out a new look.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** They would get severe burns if they sat out in the sun like Kramer did.

Top