History Headscratchers / PawDugan

* Paw made an f-up in his ''Snoopy Comes Home'' review bigger than many of WebVideo/TheNostalgiaCritic's f-ups (the only bigger ones I can think of right now are "9x3=21" and the Autism joke), but no one on his forum pointed it out. He said that ''Disney/TheManyAdventuresOfWinnieThePooh'' is not a Disney movie. Did the fans want to act polite, or do they have a strong obliviousness of Paw's flaws? I'm not asking this on his forum because I don't want to offend anyone there.

** In [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PeJmQkhJHjA&t=25m5s this video]] (January 2015) he expresses surprise that people are still asking about it, and promises to look into it. He admits wanting to wait for the final episode of The Silver Lining and more information about the new game by the Odd Gentlemen, but basically he forgot about it.

** In the [[http://channelawesome.com/lets-play-live-owls-quest-part-2/ second part of the Owl's Quest Let's Play]] (posted in October 2011) he claims that he's gathering footage for the King's Quest Special covering fan remakes. This would imply that he still intends to make a formal Legacy video. Perhaps he's waiting for the final episode of The Silver Lining to be released, although he could still release a formal statement to that effect (especially since the most recent episode of that game was released in November 2011).

* Paw did a review of "TheMuppetsTakeManhattan"... and forgot to review "TheMuppetsTakeManhattan". Confused? Well, to quote a comment:
-->'''[=IffySAM=]:''' I love your shows, Paw, and I hate the idea of being critical to you, but I feel like this was your weakest episode. By a fair margin. You barely commented on the movie's plot, and didn't even stick with half the songs for very long. Was there a deadline issue? It doesn't seem like much time has passed since you last vid, at least compared with previous hiatuses.

* Paw did a review of "TheMuppetsTakeManhattan"... and forgot to review "TheMuppetsTakeManhattan".

* Paw's conflation of masculinity with straightness, which he exhibits in multiple videos. This wouldn't be so out of place if he weren't otherwise on-the-point with other controversial material; for example, he's quite good about pointing out racism, as with his Peter Pan video. Discussing potential racism against the Muppets was funny and worked for me, too. As it is, though, his rather basic idea of masculinity and repeated jokes about it seem like cheap, unfunny cop-outs (examples include both the 'GAYDERHOSEN' joke in his Sound of Music video and his extended crisis of sexuality after discovering that Peter Pan is played by a woman).
** It's just a joke. There's a long history of men in fiction reacting to liking something feminine or noticing a guy by trying to act super macho. Don't take it too seriously.
*** Re: the long history - exactly. It's played out, outdated, and extremely problematic.
** Paul even apologises for making it seem homophobic in his first anniversary of music movies video, stating it was a joke.

* Paw's conflation of masculinity with straightness, which he exhibits in multiple videos. This wouldn't be so out of place if he weren't otherwise so on-the-point with other controversial material; for example, he's usually quite good about pointing out racism, such as in his Peter Pan video, and talking about possible racism against Muppets was pretty funny. As it is, though, his rather basic idea of masculinity and repeated jokes about it seem like cheap, unfunny cop-outs (examples include both the 'GAYDERHOSEN' joke in his Sound of Music video and his extended crisis of sexuality after discovering that Peter Pan is played by a woman)

* Paw's conflation of masculinity with straightness, which he exhibits in multiple videos. This wouldn't be so out of place if he weren't otherwise so on-the-point with other controversial material; for example, he's usually quite good about pointing out racism, such as in his Peter Pan video, and talking about possible racism against Muppets was pretty funny. As it is, though, his rather basic idea of masculinity and repeated jokes about it seem like cheap, unfunny cop-outs.

* Paw made an f-up in his ''Snoopy Comes Home'' review bigger than many of WebOriginal/TheNostalgiaCritic's f-ups (the only bigger ones I can think of right now are "9x3=21" and the Autism joke), but no one on his forum pointed it out. He said that ''Disney/TheManyAdventuresOfWinnieThePooh'' is not a Disney movie. Did the fans want to act polite, or do they have a strong obliviousness of Paw's flaws? I'm not asking this on his forum because I don't want to offend anyone there.

* Paw made an f-up in his ''Snoopy Comes Home'' review bigger than many of WebOriginal/TheNostalgiaCritic's f-ups (the only bigger ones I can think of right now are "9x3=21" and the Autism joke), but no one on his forum pointed it out. Does this mean his fans want to act polite, or they have a strong obliviousness of Paw's flaws? I'm not asking this on his forum because I don't want to offend anyone there.