Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Headscratchers / FightClub

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* This is an issue with a lot of villain-protagonist(ish) films, but I'll bring it up here anyway: ''how'' am I expected to accept the "sweet" part of this BittersweetEnding when there's still the fact that the Narrator '''''blew up a dozen credit card buildings?''''' (If I'm recalling the plan right, that is.) I know that Tyler had fight club members in the local police force, but that sort of thing would draw a huge crowd of federal-investigator types, wouldn't it? How could the Narrator go on to live a normal life with Marla with ''that'' big ol' matzo ball hanging over his head?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** It's entirely possible that what we're seeing Jack doing is in his head, while Tyler is actually doing things in the physical world. Tyler fucks Marla, while Jack imagines himself doing situps, for example.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Why do so many people think Tyler was the hero of the movie? I'm not talking Alternate Character Interpretation or just liking the character (he's a well-written character and Brad Pitt's acting was awesome. Hell, I have the guy's face on a T-shit!) I'm talking about thinking Palahniuk/Jim Uhls/David Fincher intended for him to be the hero of the story. Even for someone who never read Palahniuk's work (stories about deeply broken characters dealing with life in unhealthy ways) it should be clear, by way of conventional tools of storytelling, that Tyler is the vilain. He almost destroys the protagonist's (Ed Norton's character) life. He's the cause of conflict. The way for the protagonist to be happy and be able to have love in his life is LITERALLY by making Tyler cease to exist! In the end, Ed Norton kills the villain, gets the girl and either lives happily ever after or saves his love interest via heroic sacrifice. By every standard we're used to, "Jack"'s the hero, Tyler's the vilain. The fact that this have scaped so many people's attention is something that will forever baffle me.

to:

* Why do so many people think Tyler was the hero of the movie? I'm not talking Alternate Character Interpretation or just liking the character (he's a well-written character and Brad Pitt's acting was awesome. Hell, I have the guy's face on a T-shit!) T-shirt!) I'm talking about thinking Palahniuk/Jim Uhls/David Fincher intended for him to be the hero of the story. Even for someone who never read Palahniuk's work (stories about deeply broken characters dealing with life in unhealthy ways) it should be clear, by way of conventional tools of storytelling, that Tyler is the vilain. He almost destroys the protagonist's (Ed Norton's character) life. He's the cause of conflict. The way for the protagonist to be happy and be able to have love in his life is LITERALLY by making Tyler cease to exist! In the end, Ed Norton kills the villain, gets the girl and either lives happily ever after or saves his love interest via heroic sacrifice. By every standard we're used to, "Jack"'s the hero, Tyler's the vilain. The fact that this have scaped so many people's attention is something that will forever baffle me.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** There seems to be a little bit of time displacement going on in the Narrator's dissociation between him and Tyler. It's likely that the things we see the Narrator doing is what he's doing at that time--he fucked Marla earlier, and "hears" it later. Or vice verse.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* We see Jack come home from work or work out while Tyler is, to put it in the tone of the film, fucking Marla. So, which is it? since [[LateArrivalSpoiler they're the same person]] what was Jack doing? fucking Marla or doing his other stuff?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Because The Narrator needed to confront and overcome Tyler's destructive influence to shake him out of his soft, complacent lifestyle into true maturity. "Our great war is a spirtual war. Our great depression is our lives."

to:

** Because Tyler was right about the fact that The Narrator's soft, complacent lifestyle was preventing him from living life to the fullest. However, The Narrator needed to confront and overcome Tyler's destructive influence immature reaction to shake him out of his soft, complacent lifestyle into true maturity. consumerist society (destroy it) in order to recognize the mature reaction to society (create something and build a genuine connection to another person) "Our great war is a spirtual war. Our great depression is our lives."
" Without the villain, there could be no hero.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

**Because The Narrator needed to confront and overcome Tyler's destructive influence to shake him out of his soft, complacent lifestyle into true maturity. "Our great war is a spirtual war. Our great depression is our lives."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


**** No need to call other tropers idiots. It's very possible that a doctor wouldn't care about his patient in a film about how uncaring and selfish society has become. A mild sedative for a hypocondriac insomniac is probably a good choice, but I think most doctors would recommend a pill based on valerian root, rather than telling his patient to gow chew on a herb.

to:

**** No need to call other tropers idiots. It's very possible that a doctor wouldn't care about his patient in a film about how uncaring and selfish society has become.become and is very much supported by the doctors demeanor in that scene. A mild sedative for a hypocondriac insomniac is probably a good choice, but I think most doctors would recommend a pill based on valerian root, rather than telling his patient to gow chew on a herb.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

**** No need to call other tropers idiots. It's very possible that a doctor wouldn't care about his patient in a film about how uncaring and selfish society has become. A mild sedative for a hypocondriac insomniac is probably a good choice, but I think most doctors would recommend a pill based on valerian root, rather than telling his patient to gow chew on a herb.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** As someone in the novel SalemsLot points out, some people in RealLife go ''very'' quietly and virtually unnoticeably insane. Besides, the person with the most contact with Whatshisface, Marla, is if anything even farther gone than he is.

to:

** As someone in the novel SalemsLot ''Literature/SalemsLot'' points out, some people in RealLife go ''very'' quietly and virtually unnoticeably insane. Besides, the person with the most contact with Whatshisface, Marla, is if anything even farther gone than he is.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** Of note to this: In the book, the scene where the Narrator is trying to get Marla out of town is slightly different. He flat tells her about what's going on, and to help his case, he shows Marla his drivers license to show that he's not Tyler Durden. Also, it bears mentioning that in the reveal at the hotel room, Tyler says to the Narrator that he's slowly letting himself become Tyler Durden.
*** To add to that, the whole point of Tyler's "don't discuss me" rule is so the Narrator doesn't put it together, tip off someone around him (most likely Marla, which is what happens) who then pushes him to see help, effectively erasing Tyler from existence. Were the Narrator really named Tyler Durden, he would have picked up on it far earlier, as all it took was one person referring to him as Mr. Durden for him to start pulling at that thread. His emails at work, business cards, his own license, etc, would have tipped him off. He spends a couple weeks flying all over the country. His real name would have been all over a lot of stuff, and it's way more likely that the more aware of the condition Tyler would use the Narrators name when necessary.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Why do so many people think Tyler was the hero of the movie? I'm not talking Alternate Character Interpretation or just liking the character (he's a well-written character and Brad Pitt's acting was awesome. Hell, I have the guy's face on a T-shit!) I'm talking about thinking Palahniuk/Jim Uhls/David Fincher intended for him to be the hero of the story. Even for someone who never read Palahniuk's work (stories about deeply broken characters dealing with life in unhealthy ways) it should be clear, by way of conventional tools of storytelling, that Tyler is the vilain. He almost destroys the protagonist's (Ed Norton's character) life. He's the cause of conflict. The way for the protagonist to be happy and be able to have love in his life is LITERALLY by making Tyler cease to exist! In the end, Ed Norton kills the villain, gets the girl and either lives happily ever after or saves his love interest via heroic sacrifice. By every standard we're used to, "Jack"'s the hero, Tyler's the vilain. The fact that this have scaped so many people's attention is something that will forever baffle me.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Note that in the fight with his boss, the Narrator is being told about his rampant absenteeism.


Added DiffLines:

**** The movie makes no such thing clear. All it does is tell us that the Narrator called himself Tyler Durden during Project Mayhem. That may well be his real name, or he might have picked it up from the aforementioned hypothetical soap salesman.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Removing wick to Did Not Do The Research per rename at TRS.


* In the beginning of the movie, the narrator goes to see a doctor who tells him that "nobody ever died of insomnia". [[DidNotDoTheResearch Yeah]], [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fatal_insomnia about that...]]

to:

* In the beginning of the movie, the narrator goes to see a doctor who tells him that "nobody ever died of insomnia". [[DidNotDoTheResearch Yeah]], Yeah, [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fatal_insomnia about that...]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

*** This troper is correct. Jack turned the gun away from his brain, but Tyler thought he shot it through the head. Jack's thoughts have no effect on Tyler's actions, so it didn't matter if Jack believed he was shooting himself or not. Tyler believed it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Well, [[spoiler: The movie makes it clear that the Narrator's name really is Tyler Durden, so I don't see how such a coincidence would explain anything]]. And for it to explain stealing the car, this person would have to be a cohort of some type, which makes it strange that the Narrator thought he was talking to Brad Pitt's character.

to:

*** Well, [[spoiler: The the movie makes it clear that the Narrator's name really is Tyler Durden, so I don't see how such a coincidence would explain anything]].anything. And for it to explain stealing the car, this person would have to be a cohort of some type, which makes it strange that the Narrator thought he was talking to Brad Pitt's character.

Added: 340

Changed: 1

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Or it is possible that there is a real soap salesman named Tyler Durden who happened to sit next to the Narrator and since he was everything that the Narrator wasn't the Narrator simply used this cool seeming guy he met on a plane as the basis for his hallucination also this would explain how Tyler was able to steal a car while the Narrator wasn't present.

to:

** Or it is possible that there is a real soap salesman named Tyler Durden who happened to sit next to the Narrator and since he was everything that the Narrator wasn't the Narrator simply used this cool seeming guy he met on a plane as the basis for his hallucination also this would explain how Tyler was able to steal a car while the Narrator wasn't present. present.
*** Well, [[spoiler: The movie makes it clear that the Narrator's name really is Tyler Durden, so I don't see how such a coincidence would explain anything]]. And for it to explain stealing the car, this person would have to be a cohort of some type, which makes it strange that the Narrator thought he was talking to Brad Pitt's character.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Or it is possible that there is a real soap salesman named Tyler Durden who happened to sit next to the Narrator and since he was everything that the Narrator wasn't the Narrator simply used this cool seeming guy he met on a plane as the basis for his hallucination also this would explain how Tyler was able to steal a car while the Narrator wasn't present.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Actually if you watch his feet they flail in a way that could be him pushing himselfalong the floor or at least thats how I always assumed it happened.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
the Namespace Fix


* In the scene where Tyler is in the car with the two gang members, what is actually happening? The Project Mayhem guys certainly seemed to be addressing a fourth person in the car.

to:

* In the scene where Tyler is in the car with the two gang members, what is actually happening? The Project Mayhem guys certainly seemed to be addressing a fourth person in the car.



*** There was a oneshot on FF which involved this situation. It dealt with it extremely well. (I think it was called A Near Life Experience or something. Not sure, though. You'll find it if you wanna see, there's only about 250 on there.)

to:

*** There was a oneshot on FF which involved this situation. It dealt with it extremely well. (I think it was called A Near Life Experience or something. Not sure, though. You'll find it if you wanna see, there's only about 250 on there.) )



*** This troper always thought that Tyler didn't really die...instead, the narrator and Tyler stopped being seperate, and merged together. After he gets shot, the narrator stops panicking, starts being a lot more assertive, and bosses around the project mayhem guys like he's used to it. He also stops worrying about the bombs in the buildings and calmly watches them exploding. The personality disorder the Narrator has has been known to be cured by a traumatic event, and I'd say a gunshot wound to the face qualifies.

to:

*** This troper always thought that Tyler didn't really die...instead, the narrator and Tyler stopped being seperate, and merged together. After he gets shot, the narrator stops panicking, starts being a lot more assertive, and bosses around the project mayhem guys like he's used to it. He also stops worrying about the bombs in the buildings and calmly watches them exploding. The personality disorder the Narrator has has been known to be cured by a traumatic event, and I'd say a gunshot wound to the face qualifies.



*** {{FridgeLogic}} proves that the book ending is actually the Narrator is in an insane asylum and doesn't want to leave because Members of Fight Club are still lurking around.

to:

*** {{FridgeLogic}} FridgeLogic proves that the book ending is actually the Narrator is in an insane asylum and doesn't want to leave because Members of Fight Club are still lurking around.



** I always assumed the "life insurance pays triple if you die on a business trip" line was sarcasm and implying that he sees his whole life as just consuming until he's dead.

to:

** I always assumed the "life insurance pays triple if you die on a business trip" line was sarcasm and implying that he sees his whole life as just consuming until he's dead.
dead.



* This little ditty was always a point of interest for me when watching the film, but remember in TheMatrix how Morpheus explains to Neo that how he views himself is considered "Residual Self Image". I actually applied that here to Tyler and the Narrator and I noticed something: After the Narrator wakes up to find that Tyler has gone missing, he goes around damn near the entire United States looking for him, but all the while he's still wearing the exact same outfit, then when we see Tyler again, Tyler has shaved his head, is wearing sunglasses and a big fur coat, orange fishnets, etc. When I noticed this radical change and factored in the fact that Tyler had been in control of the Narrator's body I realized that what we were seeing of the Narrator may have been what he assumed he still looked like, and the Tyler we saw sitting in the chair is what everyone else saw.

to:

* This little ditty was always a point of interest for me when watching the film, but remember in TheMatrix Film/TheMatrix how Morpheus explains to Neo that how he views himself is considered "Residual Self Image". I actually applied that here to Tyler and the Narrator and I noticed something: After the Narrator wakes up to find that Tyler has gone missing, he goes around damn near the entire United States looking for him, but all the while he's still wearing the exact same outfit, then when we see Tyler again, Tyler has shaved his head, is wearing sunglasses and a big fur coat, orange fishnets, etc. When I noticed this radical change and factored in the fact that Tyler had been in control of the Narrator's body I realized that what we were seeing of the Narrator may have been what he assumed he still looked like, and the Tyler we saw sitting in the chair is what everyone else saw.



* Tyler may believe he rejects society but looking at his way of dressing it kinda makes him hypocritical. He is wearing ridiculously flashy clothes, sunglasses indoors (hardly the shit you need) and so on. And in the end everything he hated. Yes, it probably is what the narrator wanted for himself but why wouldn't he have noticed it? If so did our narrator know Tyler didn't exist from the beginning?

to:

* Tyler may believe he rejects society but looking at his way of dressing it kinda makes him hypocritical. He is wearing ridiculously flashy clothes, sunglasses indoors (hardly the shit you need) and so on. And in the end everything he hated. Yes, it probably is what the narrator wanted for himself but why wouldn't he have noticed it? If so did our narrator know Tyler didn't exist from the beginning? beginning?




* One thing I've never understood: On the flight where Tyler is introduced, he talks about the emergency oxygen masks on airliners. His claim is that they pipe pure oxygen to the passengers to sedate them and make them docile, so they "accept their fate." Even if this was true (it isn't-they don't deliver pure O2), why is this presented as something sinister? If the plane truly is spiralling to its doom, it seems like calming the passengers in their last moments would be admirable.

to:

\n
* One thing I've never understood: On the flight where Tyler is introduced, he talks about the emergency oxygen masks on airliners. His claim is that they pipe pure oxygen to the passengers to sedate them and make them docile, so they "accept their fate." Even if this was true (it isn't-they don't deliver pure O2), why is this presented as something sinister? If the plane truly is spiralling to its doom, it seems like calming the passengers in their last moments would be admirable.



** It's the phone number for the Paper Street address. No one answered when the narrator called and then he imagined Tyler returning the call via *69. Look closely and the pay-phone even has a sign saying "No Incoming Calls". As an added clue to the ending, the number he gave Marla before the Condo blew up was the one for Paper Street.

to:

** It's the phone number for the Paper Street address. No one answered when the narrator called and then he imagined Tyler returning the call via *69. Look closely and the pay-phone even has a sign saying "No Incoming Calls". As an added clue to the ending, the number he gave Marla before the Condo blew up was the one for Paper Street.



** I always assumed that he was talking to himself and that the seat next to him was empty. Either that or the conversation did indeed take place entirely in his head.

to:

** I always assumed that he was talking to himself and that the seat next to him was empty. Either that or the conversation did indeed take place entirely in his head.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** The movie expects you to believe that they are truly MadeOfIron.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Also to add to this^, the only phone we see in the Paper Street house is a rotary phone. No *69 for you.


Added DiffLines:

* I always wondered; how did the narrator turn off the electricity in the house while simultaneously banging Marla Singer two floors above? The electricity obviously went out, unless he was so deluded that he could've done it earlier and then just imagined everything else. This goes for anything that the narrator does while Tyler is actually busy, but a lot seem like they can be explained. Not sure how Jack ran down the stairs and picked up the phone in two seconds, either...
* Does Jack actually get seriously beaten twice in a row? Once by Lou, and then the next day in his boss's office by himself? Even for the remarkable immune systems we see in Fight Club, this seems pretty far-fetched.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Even simpler than that. You're all avoiding the obvious, folks: [[ViewersAreMorons People.]] [[TruthInTelevision Are.]] [[ThisIsSparta Idiots.]]

to:

*** Even simpler than that. You're all avoiding the obvious, folks: [[ViewersAreMorons People.]] [[TruthInTelevision Are.]] [[ThisIsSparta [[PunctuatedForEmphasis Idiots.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
YMMV sinkhole


*** [[DownerEnding That's a]] ''[[YourMileageMayVary better]]'' [[DownerEnding way to end it?]]

to:

*** [[DownerEnding That's a]] ''[[YourMileageMayVary better]]'' ''better'' [[DownerEnding way to end it?]]



** Two reasons. First: plain and simple, MisaimedFandom. Second: the movie shows screwed up people and actions, but much of the protagonist's complaining about life, the society etc. does ring true. And easy escapism is tempting - especially wrapped in something badass and glamorous like a Fight Club. Plus, YourMileageMayVary, but the initial Fight Clubs did no actual harm, it was when Tyler wanted to "change things" with Project Mayhem that everything spiralled out of control (and, might I add, it was only then that the protagonist tried to stop him).

to:

** Two reasons. First: plain and simple, MisaimedFandom. Second: the movie shows screwed up people and actions, but much of the protagonist's complaining about life, the society etc. does ring true. And easy escapism is tempting - especially wrapped in something badass and glamorous like a Fight Club. Plus, YourMileageMayVary, but the initial Fight Clubs did no actual harm, it was when Tyler wanted to "change things" with Project Mayhem that everything spiralled out of control (and, might I add, it was only then that the protagonist tried to stop him).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** It's the phone number for the Paper Street address. No one answered when the narrator called and then he imagined Tyler returning the call via *69. Look closely and the pay-phone even has a sign saying "No Incoming Calls". As an added clue to the ending, the number he gave Marla before the Condo blew up was the one for Paper Street.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** The whole film is seen through the narrator's point of view, so every camera is in a location that the narrator has been. Its probably not likely that the narrator made his way to the nearest security booth to watch the footage of him dragging himself in the parking lot. Even if he did, he wouldn't see anything, meaning the footage would be blank, and therefore useless to the film.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** I always assumed that he was talking to himself and that the seat next to him was empty. Or, perhaps the conversation did indeed take place entirely in his head.

to:

** I always assumed that he was talking to himself and that the seat next to him was empty. Or, perhaps Either that or the conversation did indeed take place entirely in his head.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

**I always assumed that he was talking to himself and that the seat next to him was empty. Or, perhaps the conversation did indeed take place entirely in his head.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

**You mean to say that the Narrator, at least by that point in the story, had shaved his head and was actually dressed in that fur coat and sunglasses and everything?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* More about the plane: Was the seat next to Tyler/Narrator empty? Or was he talking to himself and ignoring all of his rowmate's annoyed and confused responses? Or did he not say any of it out loud, including the desperate laugh?

Top