Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Headscratchers / DisneyThemeParks

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Agreed. This troper has yet to find or see ''anything'' Hunchback related in any of the stores at Disneyworld in the past few years, and it's probably been much longer. I heard the beginning of a cover of Topsy Turvy playing on the loudspeakers while walking to Phantasmic. It was cut off ten seconds after it began and replaced by Under the Sea. Do they even ''have'' an Esmerelda face character?

to:

** Agreed. This troper has yet to find or see ''anything'' Hunchback related in any of the stores at Disneyworld in the past few years, and it's probably been much longer. I heard the beginning of a cover of Topsy Turvy playing on the loudspeakers while walking to Phantasmic.watch Fantasmic. It was cut off ten seconds after it began and replaced by Under the Sea. Do they even ''have'' an Esmerelda face character?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Agreed. This troper has yet to find or see ''anything'' Hunchback related in any of the stores at Disneyworld in the past few years, and it's probably been much longer. I heard the beginning of a cover of Topsy Turvy playing on the loudspeakers while walking to Phantasmic. It was cut off ten seconds after it began and replaced by Under the Sea. Do they even ''have'' an Esmerelda face character?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** This Troper is convinced that the characters have become nothing more than walking advertisements for their popular/newer movies. If they can't make money off of it, why bother trying, right? *facepalm* For the record, This Troper is a huge fan of Disney/TheHunchbackOfNotreDame and has been terribly embittered by the lack of characters from that movie.

to:

** This Troper is convinced that the characters have become nothing more than walking advertisements for their popular/newer movies. If they can't make money off of it, why bother trying, right? *facepalm* For the record, This Troper is a huge fan of Disney/TheHunchbackOfNotreDame and has been terribly embittered by the lack of characters from that movie.movie.
* What's with all the attractions that are based off franchises not owned by Disney, like as IndianaJones and StarWars? They never had anything to do with that company throughout their respective histories. Sure some of the rides at the parks were original creations not derived from the studio's history, but I would never compare StarWars to something related to Disney.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Mulan shows up in the China pavilion of Epcot, and the only reason for that is probably because there are a lot of complaints that World Showcase is boring for kids and doesn't have enough Disney in it.



* Does anyone else wonder if the people managing the Theme parks have something against a couple Disney films? I notice that Disneyland isn't very nice to {{Mulan}}, since she's barely acknowledged at all. They clearly have something against many of their live-action films that aren't ''MaryPoppins''. Maybe they think the kids wouldn't recognize them, and the PeripheryDemographic of the costumed characters (eg, people who don't like to meet them but like to see how the costumes were designed) isn't large enough to have people from less-popular Disney movies walking around? It would explain some absences, in addition to the fact that nobody probably wants to walk around dressed like TheReluctantDragon or [[ThePrincessAndTheFrog Louis]]. But why the {{Mulan}} hate? I've been there in 2010 and 2011, and it seems almost like it's been put into DisContinuity. Heck, they even put Rapunzel's hair in the park and added Tiana to the Fantasmic show.

to:

* Does anyone else wonder if the people managing the Theme parks have something against a couple Disney films? I notice that Disneyland isn't very nice to {{Mulan}}, since she's barely acknowledged at all. They clearly have something against many of their live-action films that aren't ''MaryPoppins''. Maybe they think the kids wouldn't recognize them, and the PeripheryDemographic of the costumed characters (eg, people who don't like to meet them but like to see how the costumes were designed) isn't large enough to have people from less-popular Disney movies walking around? It would explain some absences, in addition to the fact that nobody probably wants to walk around dressed like TheReluctantDragon or [[ThePrincessAndTheFrog Louis]]. But why the {{Mulan}} hate? I've been there in 2010 and 2011, and it seems almost like it's been put into DisContinuity. Heck, they even put Rapunzel's hair in the park and added Tiana to the Fantasmic show.show.
** This Troper is convinced that the characters have become nothing more than walking advertisements for their popular/newer movies. If they can't make money off of it, why bother trying, right? *facepalm* For the record, This Troper is a huge fan of Disney/TheHunchbackOfNotreDame and has been terribly embittered by the lack of characters from that movie.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** What parks are these you're going to where you've been seeing Mulan? In all my trips to Disneyland, the only time I ''ever'' saw them acknowledge Mulan's existence was when the movie was newly-released into theatres and they put a float of the ancestors into one of the parades and a small barbie-synopsis of the movie on main-street, (Which is now advertising Disney Princesses. While it does have Mulan, it also puts more emphasis on the "Classic" princesses) but since 1998, Mulan seems to have been treated as DisContinuity.

to:

** What parks are these you're going to where you've been seeing Mulan? In all my trips to Disneyland, the only time I ''ever'' saw them acknowledge Mulan's existence was when the movie was newly-released into theatres and they put a float of the ancestors into one of the parades and a small barbie-synopsis of the movie on main-street, (Which is now advertising Disney Princesses. While it does have Mulan, it also puts more emphasis on the "Classic" princesses) princesses so the Mulan characters are shoved into the corner) but since 1998, Mulan seems to have been treated as DisContinuity.

Added: 2258

Changed: 501

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** AcceptableBreaksFromReality. Think of it as "Reliving" your adventure.



** You know a lot of criticisms I've seen of California Adventure were also more from the recent stuff - ie, "It's not thrillish enough", "It's not Disney enough", "It's too Disney", "It's too Pixar", "It's like Disneyland overspill", "It violates my NostalgiaFilter", etc. Some rather weird criticisms, too. (You're expecting Thrill Rides at ''Disneyland''?! A park meant to be friendly for ''families with small children''?!) Not to mention some were more "Half the park is closed", "The park seems like an ObviousBeta because all the rides wind up closed/refurbished", "half the park's walled off so we have to go to the ''complete'' parts of the park", etc. Personally I actually like it but I didn't see it in 2001; I first went in 2005.



* How come there isn't a Ghibli themed part of one of the parks?

to:

** What parks are these you're going to where you've been seeing Mulan? In all my trips to Disneyland, the only time I ''ever'' saw them acknowledge Mulan's existence was when the movie was newly-released into theatres and they put a float of the ancestors into one of the parades and a small barbie-synopsis of the movie on main-street, (Which is now advertising Disney Princesses. While it does have Mulan, it also puts more emphasis on the "Classic" princesses) but since 1998, Mulan seems to have been treated as DisContinuity.
* How come there isn't a Ghibli themed part of one of the parks?parks?
** Several reasons I would imagine. '''1)''' Studio Ghibli is completely independent from Disney - they'd have to get permission from it. '''2)''' Studio Ghibli could probably sponsor it; however they probably aren't in the financial state to do so. '''3)''' Space. Probably in Florida, since they have a lot of breathing room but in California? There's really not a lot of room. '''4)''' The omnipresent UnpleasableFanbase.
* Does anyone else wonder if the people managing the Theme parks have something against a couple Disney films? I notice that Disneyland isn't very nice to {{Mulan}}, since she's barely acknowledged at all. They clearly have something against many of their live-action films that aren't ''MaryPoppins''. Maybe they think the kids wouldn't recognize them, and the PeripheryDemographic of the costumed characters (eg, people who don't like to meet them but like to see how the costumes were designed) isn't large enough to have people from less-popular Disney movies walking around? It would explain some absences, in addition to the fact that nobody probably wants to walk around dressed like TheReluctantDragon or [[ThePrincessAndTheFrog Louis]]. But why the {{Mulan}} hate? I've been there in 2010 and 2011, and it seems almost like it's been put into DisContinuity. Heck, they even put Rapunzel's hair in the park and added Tiana to the Fantasmic show.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Speaking as a guy living in Rancho Palos Verdes (One of the 'Rich' suburbs of L.A., right up there with Beverly Hills and Bel Aire [If Will Smith is to be believed], it has done more good than harm. I know people who, because they have a year-round pass to D-Land, go out and spend a day in DCA. Yes, its kind of a glorified shopping mall, but consider this. The Boardwalk area seems lifted from the early 20th century, a piece of living semi-history. Grizzly River Run and Soarin' both give adventures into the wild unknowns of California [My mom INSISTS we go on Soarin', even though she's been a Cali resident for over 30 years, because she loves to see the sights of our state]. Finally, there's the Hollywood area. What can I say, its Hollywood for kids. So, we get all the wonders of things such as Pixar and Disney Animated Canon (the Voice Actors) without all the R-rated movies that Hollywood is apt to toss out nowadays. It is, simply put, California for those with kids, or those who can't afford to travel.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** A martial arts demonstration would be cool. Minor nitpick: Mulan doesn't wear a kimono. She wears a woman's shenyi known as a quju.

to:

** A martial arts demonstration would be cool. Minor nitpick: Mulan doesn't wear a kimono. She wears a woman's shenyi known as a quju.quju.
* How come there isn't a Ghibli themed part of one of the parks?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** [[TakeThat What awesomeness of Florida?]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Probably just branding. The primary draw of the princesses (don't know how Mulan counts as a princess) is marketed toward girls, and Mulan spends most of her film wearing distinctly non-feminine clothing. The kimono was just about the only thing she ever wore that was feminine, so that's what she's marketed as. It's annoying for me, because seeing an armored Mulan in the China pavilion would be awesome. Especially if they got an actress who could do a martial arts demonstration when she was there.

to:

** Probably just branding. The primary draw of the princesses (don't know how Mulan counts as a princess) is marketed toward girls, and Mulan spends most of her film wearing distinctly non-feminine clothing. The kimono was just about the only thing she ever wore that was feminine, so that's what she's marketed as. It's annoying for me, because seeing an armored Mulan in the China pavilion would be awesome. Especially if they got an actress who could do a martial arts demonstration when she was there.there.
** A martial arts demonstration would be cool. Minor nitpick: Mulan doesn't wear a kimono. She wears a woman's shenyi known as a quju.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** The Mad Hatter is actually a special case. He wasn't always a "face character," as they say--[[http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_CNk5peybvlw/Sqm3jq779sI/AAAAAAAABk4/CofkrHfJDqo/s320/disneyland+1963+alice+and+mad+hatter+640.jpg this]] was the original costume. Compare to http://www.bobafettmp.com/Temp/photos/Disneyland/Disney-4-8-06-Parade-MadHatter-1.jpg the contemporary version]]. (For reference, [[http://www.alice-in-wonderland.net/alicepic/disney-movie/mad-hatter-1.jpg this]] is the animated character. They opted to make the park version of the Mad Hatter look ''less'' like the film version because he doesn't work as a character ''unless he can talk.'' The rapid-fire absurd comic dialogue is more essential to the character than his straight-up appearance.

to:

*** The Mad Hatter is actually a special case. He wasn't always a "face character," as they say--[[http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_CNk5peybvlw/Sqm3jq779sI/AAAAAAAABk4/CofkrHfJDqo/s320/disneyland+1963+alice+and+mad+hatter+640.jpg this]] was the original costume. Compare to http://www.bobafettmp.com/Temp/photos/Disneyland/Disney-4-8-06-Parade-MadHatter-1.[[http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3552/3342815432_45d56004c1.jpg the contemporary version]]. (For reference, [[http://www.alice-in-wonderland.net/alicepic/disney-movie/mad-hatter-1.jpg this]] is the animated character. ) They opted to make the park version of the Mad Hatter look ''less'' like the film version because he doesn't work as a character ''unless he can talk.'' The rapid-fire absurd comic dialogue is more essential to the character than his straight-up appearance.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** The Mad Hatter is actually a special case. He wasn't always a "face character," as they say--[[http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_CNk5peybvlw/Sqm3jq779sI/AAAAAAAABk4/CofkrHfJDqo/s320/disneyland+1963+alice+and+mad+hatter+640.jpg this]] was the original costume. Compare to http://www.bobafettmp.com/Temp/photos/Disneyland/Disney-4-8-06-Parade-MadHatter-1.jpg the contemporary version]]. (For reference, [[http://www.alice-in-wonderland.net/alicepic/disney-movie/mad-hatter-1.jpg this]] is the animated character. They opted to make the park version of the Mad Hatter look ''less'' like the film version because he doesn't work as a character ''unless he can talk.'' The rapid-fire absurd comic dialogue is more essential to the character than his straight-up appearance.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Everytime I see {{Mulan}} in the parks, she's always in her kimono. The one she didn't even spend half of the movie wearing. Why not a different outfit? Is she just not recognizable without it?

to:

* Everytime I see {{Mulan}} in the parks, she's always in her kimono. The one she didn't even spend half of the movie wearing. Why not a different outfit? Is she just not recognizable without it?it?
** Probably just branding. The primary draw of the princesses (don't know how Mulan counts as a princess) is marketed toward girls, and Mulan spends most of her film wearing distinctly non-feminine clothing. The kimono was just about the only thing she ever wore that was feminine, so that's what she's marketed as. It's annoying for me, because seeing an armored Mulan in the China pavilion would be awesome. Especially if they got an actress who could do a martial arts demonstration when she was there.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Likely because of the exaggerated porportions. Hook has a signiture look of a long face with a big nose, while the Mad Hatter has a more normal looking face (you can see the Cast Member is wearing a fake nose there anyway). It probably just comes down to what makes the actor look more like the character.

to:

** Likely because of the exaggerated porportions. Hook has a signiture look of a long face with a big nose, while the Mad Hatter has a more normal looking face (you can see the Cast Member is wearing a fake nose there anyway). It probably just comes down to what makes the actor look more like the character.character.
* Everytime I see {{Mulan}} in the parks, she's always in her kimono. The one she didn't even spend half of the movie wearing. Why not a different outfit? Is she just not recognizable without it?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Regarding the actors dressed as Disney characters, specifically, human characters: why do some of them, like [[http://www.awesomeallday.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/captain-hook-and-mr-smee-disneyland-costumes.jpg Captain Hook]], wear giant mascot heads, while others like [[http://www.bobafettmp.com/Temp/photos/Disneyland/Disney-4-8-06-Parade-MadHatter-1.jpg the Mad Hatter,]] simply wear makeup? Seeing one next to the other is a bit incongruous, not to mention how creepy those giant grinning masks look.

to:

* Regarding the actors dressed as Disney characters, specifically, human characters: why do some of them, like [[http://www.awesomeallday.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/captain-hook-and-mr-smee-disneyland-costumes.jpg Captain Hook]], wear giant mascot heads, while others like [[http://www.bobafettmp.com/Temp/photos/Disneyland/Disney-4-8-06-Parade-MadHatter-1.jpg the Mad Hatter,]] simply wear makeup? Seeing one next to the other is a bit incongruous, not to mention how creepy those giant grinning masks look.look.
** Likely because of the exaggerated porportions. Hook has a signiture look of a long face with a big nose, while the Mad Hatter has a more normal looking face (you can see the Cast Member is wearing a fake nose there anyway). It probably just comes down to what makes the actor look more like the character.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Just to clarify: Paul Pressler didn't actually believe that people go to Disney parks for the shopping. That can be part of the draw for some, since they offer some lines of merchandise not found anywhere else. But Pressler came to the theme park division directly from a stint as President of the Disney Store retail chain and only knew how to relate to guests as shoppers. It was more ''convenient'' for him to treat the park like a giant mall. Ironically, under his "leadership," the merchandise at Disneyland was genericized to the point where people were ''less'' likely to come for the shopping.

to:

*** Just to clarify: Paul Pressler didn't actually believe that people go to Disney parks for the shopping. That can be part of the draw for some, since they offer some lines of merchandise not found anywhere else. But Pressler came to the theme park division directly from a stint as President of the Disney Store retail chain and only knew how to relate to guests as shoppers. It was more ''convenient'' for him to treat the park like a giant mall. Ironically, under his "leadership," the merchandise at Disneyland was genericized to the point where people were ''less'' likely to come for the shopping.shopping.
*Regarding the actors dressed as Disney characters, specifically, human characters: why do some of them, like [[http://www.awesomeallday.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/captain-hook-and-mr-smee-disneyland-costumes.jpg Captain Hook]], wear giant mascot heads, while others like [[http://www.bobafettmp.com/Temp/photos/Disneyland/Disney-4-8-06-Parade-MadHatter-1.jpg the Mad Hatter,]] simply wear makeup? Seeing one next to the other is a bit incongruous, not to mention how creepy those giant grinning masks look.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** DCA was built "on the cheap," as they say - lots of off-the-shelf carnival rides, skimpy theming, heavy focus on shops and shops alone, poorly thought-out original attractions, and ideas simply borrowed from other parks without concern for how they would fit into the new park as a whole. In other words, DCA began life as a real-world sort of SouvenirLand. It needs to be said right now that '''''this is NOT normal for Disney, nor has it ever been.''''' Those responsible for the decision to go the miserly route with DCA's design and construction are no longer part of the company, and from what I understand, the leader of the initial project was very out-of-touch with the guests and genuinely believed that [[SouvenirLand they only came to the parks to shop.]] He lasted less than 10 years in his position. In the grand Disney tradition of simply moving forward and making the best of everything, the current $1.1 billion overhaul seeks to raise DCA in quality from an above-average amusement park to a genuine Disney theme park. (And it's working!) As for why haters still exist? They really have nothing to go off of, but like most hate groups in the world, they do it [[CompensatingForSomething solely to feel superior to someone]], so they keep on hating despite lacking a valid foundation for their actions.

to:

** DCA was built "on the cheap," as they say - lots of off-the-shelf carnival rides, skimpy theming, heavy focus on shops and shops alone, poorly thought-out original attractions, and ideas simply borrowed from other parks without concern for how they would fit into the new park as a whole. In other words, DCA began life as a real-world sort of SouvenirLand. It needs to be said right now that '''''this is NOT normal for Disney, nor has it ever been.''''' Those responsible for the decision to go the miserly route with DCA's design and construction are no longer part of the company, and from what I understand, the leader of the initial project was very out-of-touch with the guests and genuinely believed that [[SouvenirLand they only came to the parks to shop.]] He lasted less than 10 years in his position. In the grand Disney tradition of simply moving forward and making the best of everything, the current $1.1 billion overhaul seeks to raise DCA in quality from an above-average amusement park to a genuine Disney theme park. (And it's working!) As for why haters still exist? They really have nothing to go off of, but like most hate groups in the world, they do it [[CompensatingForSomething solely to feel superior to someone]], so they keep on hating despite lacking a valid foundation for their actions.actions.
*** Just to clarify: Paul Pressler didn't actually believe that people go to Disney parks for the shopping. That can be part of the draw for some, since they offer some lines of merchandise not found anywhere else. But Pressler came to the theme park division directly from a stint as President of the Disney Store retail chain and only knew how to relate to guests as shoppers. It was more ''convenient'' for him to treat the park like a giant mall. Ironically, under his "leadership," the merchandise at Disneyland was genericized to the point where people were ''less'' likely to come for the shopping.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Well, even if you decide to ''think'' of it as though it's real (which I assume is what you meant above unless you can really delude yourself into thinking it's real) you still know it's not real, right? MST3KMantra
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Capax Infiniti

Added DiffLines:

** That would be nice...It would save you a lot of time usually spent on waiting in lines, and it would be like one huge, insane, disjointed adventure.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Typos


** DCA was built "on the cheap," as they say - lots of off-the-shelf carnival rides, skimpy theming, heavy focus on shops and shops alone, poorly thought-out original attractions, and ideas simply borrowed from other parks without concern for how they would fit into the new park as a whole. In other words, DCA began life as a real-world sort of SouvenirLand. It needs to be said right now that '''''this is NOT normal for Disney, nor has it ever been.''' Those responsible for the decision to go the miserly route with DCA's design and construction are no longer part of the company, and from what I understand, the leader of the initial project was very out-of-touch with the guests and genuinely believed that [[SouvenirLand they only came to the parks to shop.]] He lasted less than 10 years in his position. In the grand Disney tradition of simply moving forward and making the best of everything, the current $1.1 billion overhaul seeks to raise DCA in quality from an above-average amusement park to a genuine Disney theme park. (And it's working!) As for why haters still exist? They really have nothing to go off of, but like most hate groups in the world, they do it [[CompensatingForSomething solely to feel superior to someone]], so they keep on hating despite lacking a valid foundation for their actions.

to:

** DCA was built "on the cheap," as they say - lots of off-the-shelf carnival rides, skimpy theming, heavy focus on shops and shops alone, poorly thought-out original attractions, and ideas simply borrowed from other parks without concern for how they would fit into the new park as a whole. In other words, DCA began life as a real-world sort of SouvenirLand. It needs to be said right now that '''''this is NOT normal for Disney, nor has it ever been.''' ''''' Those responsible for the decision to go the miserly route with DCA's design and construction are no longer part of the company, and from what I understand, the leader of the initial project was very out-of-touch with the guests and genuinely believed that [[SouvenirLand they only came to the parks to shop.]] He lasted less than 10 years in his position. In the grand Disney tradition of simply moving forward and making the best of everything, the current $1.1 billion overhaul seeks to raise DCA in quality from an above-average amusement park to a genuine Disney theme park. (And it's working!) As for why haters still exist? They really have nothing to go off of, but like most hate groups in the world, they do it [[CompensatingForSomething solely to feel superior to someone]], so they keep on hating despite lacking a valid foundation for their actions.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** DCA was built "on the cheap," as they say - lots of off-the-shelf carnival rides, skimpy theming, heavy focus on shops and shops alone, poorly thought-out original attractions, and ideas simply borrowed from other parks without concern for how they would fit into the new park as a whole. In other words, DCA began life as a real-world sort of SouvenirLand. With those responsible for DCA's miserly design no longer involved in Disney's executive decision-making, the current $1.1 billion overhaul seeks to raise DCA in quality from an above-average amusement park to a genuine Disney theme park. As for why haters still exist? They really have nothing to go off of, but like most hate groups in the world, they do it [[CompensatingForSomething solely to feel superior to someone]], so they keep on hating despite lacking a valid foundation for their actions.

to:

** DCA was built "on the cheap," as they say - lots of off-the-shelf carnival rides, skimpy theming, heavy focus on shops and shops alone, poorly thought-out original attractions, and ideas simply borrowed from other parks without concern for how they would fit into the new park as a whole. In other words, DCA began life as a real-world sort of SouvenirLand. With those It needs to be said right now that '''''this is NOT normal for Disney, nor has it ever been.''' Those responsible for the decision to go the miserly route with DCA's miserly design and construction are no longer involved part of the company, and from what I understand, the leader of the initial project was very out-of-touch with the guests and genuinely believed that [[SouvenirLand they only came to the parks to shop.]] He lasted less than 10 years in Disney's executive decision-making, his position. In the grand Disney tradition of simply moving forward and making the best of everything, the current $1.1 billion overhaul seeks to raise DCA in quality from an above-average amusement park to a genuine Disney theme park. (And it's working!) As for why haters still exist? They really have nothing to go off of, but like most hate groups in the world, they do it [[CompensatingForSomething solely to feel superior to someone]], so they keep on hating despite lacking a valid foundation for their actions.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Long answer short in response: It's not that we dislike California Adventure, it's that the money used to build what is essentially an outdoor mall could have been used to expand and detail existing parts of the Magic Kingdom. West Coast Americans think of Disneyland as part of our cultural heritage, and even if you're 25 years old, you still remember it as something it isn't now. California Adventure is just an excuse to squeeze the Park Hopper fee out of the ticket buying public, and nothing more.

to:

** Long answer short in response: It's not that we dislike California Adventure, it's that the money used to build what is essentially an outdoor mall could have been used to expand and detail existing parts of the Magic Kingdom. West Coast Americans think of Disneyland as part of our cultural heritage, and even if you're 25 years old, you still remember it as something it isn't now. California Adventure is just an excuse to squeeze the Park Hopper fee out of the ticket buying public, and nothing more.more.
** DCA was built "on the cheap," as they say - lots of off-the-shelf carnival rides, skimpy theming, heavy focus on shops and shops alone, poorly thought-out original attractions, and ideas simply borrowed from other parks without concern for how they would fit into the new park as a whole. In other words, DCA began life as a real-world sort of SouvenirLand. With those responsible for DCA's miserly design no longer involved in Disney's executive decision-making, the current $1.1 billion overhaul seeks to raise DCA in quality from an above-average amusement park to a genuine Disney theme park. As for why haters still exist? They really have nothing to go off of, but like most hate groups in the world, they do it [[CompensatingForSomething solely to feel superior to someone]], so they keep on hating despite lacking a valid foundation for their actions.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** It's because it was a severe case of being designed by the executives with more dining and shopping locations then actual attractions.

to:

** It's because it was a severe case of being designed by the executives with more dining and shopping locations then actual attractions.attractions.
** Long answer short in response: It's not that we dislike California Adventure, it's that the money used to build what is essentially an outdoor mall could have been used to expand and detail existing parts of the Magic Kingdom. West Coast Americans think of Disneyland as part of our cultural heritage, and even if you're 25 years old, you still remember it as something it isn't now. California Adventure is just an excuse to squeeze the Park Hopper fee out of the ticket buying public, and nothing more.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** Unless you live in Florida....
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Well...what do you suggest they do about it? Turn the parks into one continuous ride?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** It's because it was a severe case of being designed by the executives with more dining and shopping locations then actual attractions.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** I just think that California Adventure should be at the Orlando Disney World, and that Disneyland should have gotten Florida Adventure. All the awesomeness of Florida without having to travel across the country!

Added: 451

Changed: 1

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* To fully embrace the magic of the Disney Theme Parks (especially the ones in style of the Magic Kingdom), you should belive that everything is real. Big Thunder Mountain is a real gold mine, you really save the universe with Buzz Lightyear, The Haunted Mansion is really cursed and so on... But even if you get pass by all the {{Time Travel}} involved, you still have to suspend your disbelive and ignore the crowds and all the safety spiels. And even then the illusion crumbles as soon as you ride a second time.

to:

* To fully embrace the magic of the Disney Theme Parks (especially the ones in style of the Magic Kingdom), you should belive that everything is real. Big Thunder Mountain is a real gold mine, you really save the universe with Buzz Lightyear, The Haunted Mansion is really cursed and so on... But even if you get pass by all the {{Time Travel}} involved, you still have to suspend your disbelive and ignore the crowds and all the safety spiels. And even then the illusion crumbles as soon as you ride a second time.time.
* Okay, what's with all the hate on California Adventure? I can understand if people were annoyed about it in the beginning with rides like Superstar Limo and crap like that, but it's gotten a hell of a lot better since then. Not to mention they're spending ''$1,000,000,000'' to give the park a 1920's Buena Vista/boardwalk theme. With World Of Color opening and everyone saying how awesome it is, California Adventure has officially redeemed itself.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* To fully embrace the magic of the Disney Theme Parks (especially the ones in style of the Magic Kingdom), you should belive that everything is real. Big Thunder Mountain is a real gold mine, you really save the universe with Buzz Lightyear, The Haunted Mansion is really cursed and so on... But even if you get pass by all the [[Time Travel]] involved, you still have to suspend your disbelive and ignore the crowds and all the safety spiels. And even then the illusion crumbles as soon as you ride a second time.

to:

* To fully embrace the magic of the Disney Theme Parks (especially the ones in style of the Magic Kingdom), you should belive that everything is real. Big Thunder Mountain is a real gold mine, you really save the universe with Buzz Lightyear, The Haunted Mansion is really cursed and so on... But even if you get pass by all the [[Time Travel]] {{Time Travel}} involved, you still have to suspend your disbelive and ignore the crowds and all the safety spiels. And even then the illusion crumbles as soon as you ride a second time.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Click the edit button to start this new page.

to:

Click * To fully embrace the edit button magic of the Disney Theme Parks (especially the ones in style of the Magic Kingdom), you should belive that everything is real. Big Thunder Mountain is a real gold mine, you really save the universe with Buzz Lightyear, The Haunted Mansion is really cursed and so on... But even if you get pass by all the [[Time Travel]] involved, you still have to start this new page.suspend your disbelive and ignore the crowds and all the safety spiels. And even then the illusion crumbles as soon as you ride a second time.

Top