Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Film / TheLifeOfDavidGale

Go To

OR

Added: 355

Changed: 257

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* SympatheticAdulterer: David. He mentions that it's an open secret that [[{{Cuckold}} his wife is having an affair in Spain]]. This fact plus the [[AlcoholInducedIdiocy alcohol involved]] makes him still feel like a good guy after the incident with Berlin.

to:

* SympatheticAdulterer: David. He mentions that it's an open secret that [[{{Cuckold}} his wife is having an affair in Spain]]. This fact plus the [[AlcoholInducedIdiocy alcohol involved]] makes him still feel like a good guy after the incident with Berlin.


Added DiffLines:

* SeparateSceneStorytelling: David's backstory is told in flashbacks which take up half the movie.


Added DiffLines:

* SympatheticAdulterer: David. He mentions that it's an open secret that [[{{Cuckold}} his wife is having an affair in Spain]]. This fact plus the [[AlcoholInducedIdiocy alcohol involved]] makes him still feel like a good guy after the incident with Berlin.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* SympatheticAdulterer: David. He mentions that it's an open secret that [[{{Cuckold}} his wife is having an affair in Spain]]. This fact plus the [[AlcoholInducedIdiocy alcohol involved]] makes the audience sympathize with his character even after the incident with Berlin.

to:

* SympatheticAdulterer: David. He mentions that it's an open secret that [[{{Cuckold}} his wife is having an affair in Spain]]. This fact plus the [[AlcoholInducedIdiocy alcohol involved]] makes the audience sympathize with his character even him still feel like a good guy after the incident with Berlin.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* {{Cuckold}}: David. He mentions that it's an open secret that his wife is having an affair in Spain. This fact plus the [[AlcoholInducedIdiocy alcohol involved]] makes him [[SympatheticAdulterer look more sympathetic]] after the incident with Berlin.

to:

* {{Cuckold}}: SympatheticAdulterer: David. He mentions that it's an open secret that [[{{Cuckold}} his wife is having an affair in Spain. Spain]]. This fact plus the [[AlcoholInducedIdiocy alcohol involved]] makes him [[SympatheticAdulterer look more sympathetic]] the audience sympathize with his character even after the incident with Berlin.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* {{Cuckold}}: David. He mentions that it's an open secret that his wife is having an affair in Spain. This fact plus the [[AlcoholInducedIdiocy alcohol involved]] makes him [[SympatheticAdulterer look more sympathetic]] after the incident with Berlin.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* TheReveal: The first videotape reveals that the murder [[spoiler:was actually a suicide with the cowboy assisting Constance. The second videotape reveals that even David was in on the coup.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
covered by Thanatos Gambit


* {{Unishment}}: Gale's execution is exactly what he wants, since it will discredit the death penalty because he is technically innocent.

Changed: 999

Removed: 626

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Broken Aesop should be the correct trope since the medium was just fine to carry the message but the plot itself did not fit


* BrokenAesop: One of the main criticisms of the film, as it turns out that whilst David isn't guilty of murder, he's not exactly 'innocent' either. See CluelessAesop.

to:

* BrokenAesop: One of The film is very clearly against the main criticisms of the film, as it turns out death penalty, by trying to show that whilst David isn't guilty an innocent person can get executed. The problem is that [[spoiler:rather than showing someone who's a victim of murder, circumstances or a frame-up, which would perfectly demonstrate its point, it shows the victim trying to "prove" that innocent people can get executed by framing ''himself'' for a crime he didn't commit, in the hopes that he will be exonerated and the death penalty will be abolished [[ThanatosGambit after he's not exactly 'innocent' either. See CluelessAesop. wrongly executed]]. Interestingly, the film ''does'' seem to be at least somewhat aware of how clueless this looks; the whole plot comes about partly because the governor in the film made a statement that he would call a moratorium on further capital punishment if anyone were ever wrongfully executed, but once this actually does happen, [[AllForNothing he refuses to do so]] because the state can't be held accountable for someone abusing the system [[SuicideByCop to deliberately kill themselves]]]].



* CluelessAesop: The film is very clearly against the death penalty, by trying to show that an innocent person can be executed. The problem is that [[spoiler:rather than showing an innocent person who is a victim of circumstances or a frame-up it shows the victim actually ''wanting'' to get executed, and both him and the murder victim actively trying to make it happen, at which point it's not really an innocent victim of the system so much as an assisted suicide. Even InUniverse this is acknowledged, as this is the reason the Governor refuses to call a moratorium and stop the death penalty as a result of Gale's case.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* LastMinuteReprieve: Heart-wrenchingly subverted when Bitsey arrives too late with the videotape.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
adding new tropes

Added DiffLines:

* ChalkOutline: The kitchen still has the outlines on the floor for crime scene tourists. Turns out they are not exactly where the actual body lied.


Added DiffLines:

* DeathSeeker: David is actually looking forward to being executed.


Added DiffLines:

* EmpathicEnvironment: It rains heavily when Bitsey watches the footage for the first time.
* EurekaMoment: The tossed-away towel at the motel reminds Bitsey of something about the hand gloves at the crime scene.


Added DiffLines:

* HospitalGurneyScene: Constance being rolled into the hospital in a gurney after David finds her collapsed in the corridor.
* HowWeGotHere: The first scene of Bitsey's BigHeroicRun is chronologically one of the last scenes of the movie. We then cut back a few days to see how she got there.
* IncrediblyObviousTail: Zack and Bitsey comment how obvious the cowboy is tailing them. It was part of his plan.


Added DiffLines:

* MyGirlIsNotASlut: Constance regrets having only slept with four men in her time as she tried hard not to be seen as a sex object.


Added DiffLines:

* OnscreenChapterTitles: Each of the four days is announced with an on-screen caption.
* PercussiveTherapy: David destroys a public phone in a rage after the call to his son ended unexpectedly.


Added DiffLines:

* PleaseIWillDoAnything: Subverted. David's student Berlin claims she would do anything to pass. Turns out she was just fooling with him.
* RaceAgainstTheClock: Bitsey has 24 hours to solve the case and save David from being executed after he gave her some final clues on the third day of their conversation.
* SmugglingWithDolls: The last scene is of Bitsey getting Cloud Dog mailed to her with a full videotape hidden inside.


Added DiffLines:

* TrainEscape: During a CarChase, the cowboy escapes Zack when a train cuts the latter off.
* TraumaSwing: One scene has down-on-his-luck David sitting on the swing of his sold home.
* TropicalEpilogue: The epilogue shows the cowboy finishing up business in Spain.


Added DiffLines:

* WeNeedADistraction: Bitsey has Zack lure the cowboy away from his home so she could sneak in and look for the compromising videotape.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* DownerEnding: [[spoiler:Bloom is unable to prevent Gale's execution and Gale's plan to use his own death and [[AcquittedTooLate late acquittance]] to force the Governor to put a moratory on the death sentence [[AllForNothing comes to nothing]] when the Governor, rightfully pointing out the absurdity of Gale's scheme, refuses.]]

to:

* DownerEnding: [[spoiler:Bloom is unable to prevent Gale's execution and Gale's plan to use his own death and [[AcquittedTooLate late acquittance]] acquittal]] to force the Governor to put a moratory on the death sentence [[AllForNothing comes to nothing]] when the Governor, rightfully pointing out the absurdity of Gale's scheme, refuses.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* DeathRow
* DownerEnding

to:

* DeathRow
DeathRow: David Gale is in it for murder, and he considers it [[IronicDeath ironic]] that a man who spent his life fighting the death sentence is going to be executed. [[spoiler:This is because he planned it.]]
* DownerEndingDownerEnding: [[spoiler:Bloom is unable to prevent Gale's execution and Gale's plan to use his own death and [[AcquittedTooLate late acquittance]] to force the Governor to put a moratory on the death sentence [[AllForNothing comes to nothing]] when the Governor, rightfully pointing out the absurdity of Gale's scheme, refuses.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


''The Life of David Gale'' is a 2003 thriller film directed by Alan Parker, starring Creator/KevinSpacey, Creator/KateWinslet, and Creator/LauraLinney.

to:

''The Life of David Gale'' is a 2003 thriller film directed by Alan Parker, Creator/AlanParker, starring Creator/KevinSpacey, Creator/KateWinslet, and Creator/LauraLinney.

Added: 14

Changed: 1

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AcquittedTooLate: Gale's allies are trying to prevent this. [[spoiler:At least, Bitsey Bloom is, but fails. His ''real'' plan is to cause this to happen as a political act to discourage the death penalty.]]

to:

* AcquittedTooLate: Gale's allies are trying to prevent this. [[spoiler:At least, Bitsey Bitsy Bloom is, but fails. His ''real'' plan is to cause this to happen as a political act to discourage the death penalty.]]


Added DiffLines:

* DownerEnding
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


!!This film provides examples of:

to:

!!This film provides examples of:
!!The Tropes of David Gale:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* {{Unishment}}: Gale's execution is exactly what he wants, since it will discredit the death penalty because he is technically innocent.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CluelessAesop: The film is very clearly against the death penalty, by trying to show that an innocent person can be executed. The problem is that [[spoiler:rather than showing an innocent person who is a victim of circumstances or a frame-up it shows the victim actually ''wanting'' to get executed, and both him and the murder victim actively trying to make it happen, at which point it's not really an innocent victim of death penalty so much as assisted suicide. Even InUniverse this is acknowledged, as this is the reason the Governor refuses to call a moratorium and stop the death penalty as a result of Gale's case.]]

to:

* CluelessAesop: The film is very clearly against the death penalty, by trying to show that an innocent person can be executed. The problem is that [[spoiler:rather than showing an innocent person who is a victim of circumstances or a frame-up it shows the victim actually ''wanting'' to get executed, and both him and the murder victim actively trying to make it happen, at which point it's not really an innocent victim of death penalty the system so much as an assisted suicide. Even InUniverse this is acknowledged, as this is the reason the Governor refuses to call a moratorium and stop the death penalty as a result of Gale's case.]]



* FalseRapeAccusation: One of the reasons David loses his job as a college professor. A female student who was failing his course for not showing up for classes later meets him at a party, seduces him, and makes it look like he raped her so she can file rape charges against him. She doesn't even follow up on them since she has already left the country before it can go to trial, she just wanted to tarnish his reputation. It also makes him more plausible as a rapist and murderer later than otherwise he might be.

to:

* FalseRapeAccusation: One of the reasons David loses his job as a college professor. A female student who was failing his course for not showing up for classes later meets him at a party, seduces him, and makes it look like he raped her so she can file rape charges against him. She doesn't even follow up on them since she has already left the country town before it can go to trial, she just wanted to tarnish his reputation. It also makes him more plausible as a rapist and murderer later than otherwise he might be.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ArtisticLicenseHistory: During a drunken ramble, David says Creator/{{Socrates}} was sentenced to death for insulting the judges by, after he was convicted, suggesting as his punishment a fine of only thirty ''mina'', comparing that to thirty bucks. In reality though, ''Literature/ApologyOfSocrates'' says he suggested a fine of a hundred ''drachma'', soon raised to three thousand-a very substantial sum. Being a literature professor, David likely would be aware of this.

to:

* ArtisticLicenseHistory: During a drunken ramble, David says Creator/{{Socrates}} was sentenced to death for insulting the judges by, after he was convicted, suggesting as his punishment a fine of only thirty ''mina'', comparing that to thirty bucks. In reality though, ''Literature/ApologyOfSocrates'' says he suggested a fine of a hundred ''drachma'', soon raised to three thousand-a very substantial sum. Being a literature philosophy professor, David likely would be aware of this.



* CluelessAesop: The film is very clearly against the death penalty, by trying to show that an innocent person can be executed. The problem is that [[spoiler:rather than showing an innocent person who is a victim of circumstances or a frame-up it shows the victim actually ''wanting'' to get executed, and both him and the murder victim actively trying to make it happen, at which point it's not really an innocent victim of death penalty so much as assisted suicide. Even InUniverse this is acknowledged, as this is the reason the Governor refuses to do a moratorium and remove the death penalty in honor of Gale.]]

to:

* CluelessAesop: The film is very clearly against the death penalty, by trying to show that an innocent person can be executed. The problem is that [[spoiler:rather than showing an innocent person who is a victim of circumstances or a frame-up it shows the victim actually ''wanting'' to get executed, and both him and the murder victim actively trying to make it happen, at which point it's not really an innocent victim of death penalty so much as assisted suicide. Even InUniverse this is acknowledged, as this is the reason the Governor refuses to do call a moratorium and remove stop the death penalty in honor as a result of Gale.Gale's case.]]



* FalseRapeAccusation: One of the reasons David loses his job as a college professor. A female student who was failing his course for not showing up for classes later meets him at a party, seduces him, and then collects his semen so she can file rape charges against him. She doesn't even follow up on them since she has already left the country before it can go to trial, she just wanted to tarnish his reputation. It also makes him more plausible as a rapist and murderer later than otherwise he might be.

to:

* FalseRapeAccusation: One of the reasons David loses his job as a college professor. A female student who was failing his course for not showing up for classes later meets him at a party, seduces him, and then collects his semen makes it look like he raped her so she can file rape charges against him. She doesn't even follow up on them since she has already left the country before it can go to trial, she just wanted to tarnish his reputation. It also makes him more plausible as a rapist and murderer later than otherwise he might be.



* WellIntentionedExtremist: [[spoiler: What Gale and those involved in the plot ultimately are. While their goal is possibly a noble one, the methods they use to attempt to achieve it slide well over into VillainProtagonist with their horrifically abusive manipulation of the justice system and their intentional involvement of innocent bystanders to be complicity in their scheme. ]]
* YouKnowWhoSaidThat: The film invokes GodwinsLaw with this. The film revolves around a university teacher and political activist who is firmly against capital punishment. During a political debate, he baits his opponent like this:

to:

* WellIntentionedExtremist: [[spoiler: What Gale and those involved in the plot ultimately are. While their goal is possibly a noble one, the methods they use to attempt to achieve it slide well over into VillainProtagonist with their horrifically abusive manipulation of the justice system and their intentional involvement of innocent bystanders to be complicity complicit in their scheme. ]]
* YouKnowWhoSaidThat: The film invokes GodwinsLaw with this. The film revolves around a university teacher philosophy professor and political activist who is firmly against capital punishment. During a political debate, he baits his opponent like this:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* WellIntentionedExtremist: [[spoiler: what Gale and those involved in the plot ultimately are. While their goal is possibly a noble one, the methods they use to attempt to achieve it slide well over into VillainProtagonist with their horrifically abusive manipulation of the justice system and their intentional involvement of innocent bystanders to be complicity in their scheme. ]]

to:

* WellIntentionedExtremist: [[spoiler: what What Gale and those involved in the plot ultimately are. While their goal is possibly a noble one, the methods they use to attempt to achieve it slide well over into VillainProtagonist with their horrifically abusive manipulation of the justice system and their intentional involvement of innocent bystanders to be complicity in their scheme. ]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* WellIntentionedExtremist: [[spoiler: what Gale and those involved in the plot ultimately are. While their goal is possibly a noble one, the methods they use to attempt to achieve it slide well over into VillainProtagonist with their horrifically abusive manipulation of the justice system and their intentional involvement of innocent bystanders to be complicity in their scheme. ]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
He's not guilty-there was no crime.


* FramingTheGuiltyParty: Specifically, a crackpot scheme in which a guilty person makes it ''look'' like he was framed to score political points.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* FramingTheGuiltyParty: Specifically, a crackpot scheme in which a guilty person makes it ''look'' like he was framed to score political points.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* FalseRapeAccusation: One of the reasons David loses his job as a college professor. A female student who was failing his course for not showing up later meets him at a party, seduces him, and then collects his semen so she can file rape charges against him. She doesn't even follow up on them since she has already left the country before it can go to trial, she just wanted to tarnish his reputation. It also makes him more plausible as a rapist and murderer later than otherwise he might be.

to:

* FalseRapeAccusation: One of the reasons David loses his job as a college professor. A female student who was failing his course for not showing up for classes later meets him at a party, seduces him, and then collects his semen so she can file rape charges against him. She doesn't even follow up on them since she has already left the country before it can go to trial, she just wanted to tarnish his reputation. It also makes him more plausible as a rapist and murderer later than otherwise he might be.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* FalseRapeAccusation: One of the reasons David loses his job as a college professor. A female student who was failing his course for not showing up later meets him at a party, seduces him, and then collects his sperm so she can file rape charges against him. She doesn't even follow up on them since she has already left the country before it can go to trial, she just wanted to tarnish his reputation. It also makes him more plausible as a rapist and murderer later than otherwise he might be.

to:

* FalseRapeAccusation: One of the reasons David loses his job as a college professor. A female student who was failing his course for not showing up later meets him at a party, seduces him, and then collects his sperm semen so she can file rape charges against him. She doesn't even follow up on them since she has already left the country before it can go to trial, she just wanted to tarnish his reputation. It also makes him more plausible as a rapist and murderer later than otherwise he might be.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* FalseRapeAccusation: One of the reasons David loses his job. It also makes him more plausible as a rapist and murderer later than otherwise he might be.

to:

* FalseRapeAccusation: One of the reasons David loses his job.job as a college professor. A female student who was failing his course for not showing up later meets him at a party, seduces him, and then collects his sperm so she can file rape charges against him. She doesn't even follow up on them since she has already left the country before it can go to trial, she just wanted to tarnish his reputation. It also makes him more plausible as a rapist and murderer later than otherwise he might be.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* BrokenAesop: One of the main criticisms of the film, as it turns out that whilst David isn't guilty of murder, he's not exactly 'innocent' either. See CluelessAesop.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* PitySex: Player with. When Constance reveals she's dying of leukemia, David asks if she has any regrets. She tells him she would have had more sex. When he asks how many partners she's had, she thinks, then holds up four fingers. He asks if she wants to "complete the hand." Her response is an incredulous "A pity lay?" He then tells her it wouldn't be pity. Not quite Sex for Solace, either. David seems to genuinely care for Constance, although she doesn't seem to be all that attracted to him. Perhaps the pity is on her part, as he's just been divorced and fired.

to:

* PitySex: Player with.{{Played with}}. When Constance reveals she's dying of leukemia, David asks if she has any regrets. She tells him she would have had more sex. When he asks how many partners she's had, she thinks, then holds up four fingers. He asks if she wants to "complete the hand." Her response is an incredulous "A pity lay?" He then tells her it wouldn't be pity. Not quite Sex {{sex for Solace, solace}}, either. David seems to genuinely care for Constance, although she doesn't seem to be all that attracted to him. Perhaps the pity is on her part, as he's just been divorced and fired.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CluelessAesop: The film is very clearly against the death penalty, by trying to show that an innocent person can be executed. The problem is that [[spoiler:rather than showing an innocent person who is a victim of circumstances or a frame-up it shows the victim actually ''wanting'' to get executed, and both him and the murder victim actively trying to make it happen, at which point it's not really an innocent victim of death penalty as an assisted suicide. Even InUniverse this is acknowledged, as this is the reason the Governor refuses to do a moratorium and remove the death penalty in honor of Gale.]]

to:

* CluelessAesop: The film is very clearly against the death penalty, by trying to show that an innocent person can be executed. The problem is that [[spoiler:rather than showing an innocent person who is a victim of circumstances or a frame-up it shows the victim actually ''wanting'' to get executed, and both him and the murder victim actively trying to make it happen, at which point it's not really an innocent victim of death penalty so much as an assisted suicide. Even InUniverse this is acknowledged, as this is the reason the Governor refuses to do a moratorium and remove the death penalty in honor of Gale.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


David Gale (Spacey) is a Texas death row inmate, former philosophy professor and anti-death penalty activist. Bitsey Bloom (Winslet) is the reporter he requests to conduct an interview in the last week of his life, before his execution for the rape and murder of his friend, colleague, and fellow activist Constance Harraway (Linney). About half of the film is a {{flashback}} as Gale describes the events leading up to his conviction, starting with a rape accusation by one of his students (Creator/RhonaMitra), and claims his innocence. With the help of her intern Zack (Gabriel Mann), Bloom must figure out what really happened and whether Gale can--and should--be saved.

to:

David Gale (Spacey) is a Texas death row inmate, former philosophy professor and anti-death penalty activist. Bitsey Bloom (Winslet) is the reporter he requests to conduct an interview in the last week of his life, before his execution for the rape and murder of his friend, colleague, and fellow activist Constance Harraway (Linney). About half of the film is a {{flashback}} as Gale describes the events leading up to his conviction, starting with a rape accusation by one of his students (Creator/RhonaMitra), and claims his innocence. With the help of her intern Zack (Gabriel Mann), (Creator/GabrielMann), Bloom must figure out what really happened and whether Gale can--and should--be saved.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CluelessAesop: The film is very clearly against the death penalty, by trying to show that an innocent person can be executed. The problem is that [[spoiler:rather than showing an innocent person who is a victim of circumstances or a frame-up it shows the victim actually ''wanting'' to get executed, and both him and the murder victim actively trying to make it happen, at which point it's not really an innocent victim of death penalty as an assisted suicide.]]

to:

* CluelessAesop: The film is very clearly against the death penalty, by trying to show that an innocent person can be executed. The problem is that [[spoiler:rather than showing an innocent person who is a victim of circumstances or a frame-up it shows the victim actually ''wanting'' to get executed, and both him and the murder victim actively trying to make it happen, at which point it's not really an innocent victim of death penalty as an assisted suicide. Even InUniverse this is acknowledged, as this is the reason the Governor refuses to do a moratorium and remove the death penalty in honor of Gale.]]

Added: 651

Changed: 137

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ClearTheirName: David Gale's intention with the interview. [[spoiler:ZigZagged in the end; his and his compatriots' actual plan is for Bloom to fail to clear his name until after his execution.]]

to:

* ClearTheirName: David Gale's intention with the interview. [[spoiler:ZigZagged [[spoiler:Subverted in the end; his and his compatriots' actual plan is for Bloom to fail to clear his name until after his execution.]]



* IntrepidReporter: Bitsey does more than the usual journalist to solve the case.



* PitySex: Player with. When Constance reveals she's dying of leukemia, David asks if she has any regrets. She tells him she would have had more sex. When he asks how many partners she's had, she thinks, then holds up four fingers. He asks if she wants to "complete the hand." Her response is an incredulous "A pity lay?" He then tells her it wouldn't be pity. Not quite Sex for Solace, either. David seems to genuinely care for Constance, although she doesn't seem to be all that attracted to him. Perhaps the pity is on her part, as he's just been divorced and fired.



* ThanatosGambit: A double, in fact.

to:

* ThanatosGambit: A double, Gale frames himself for a grisly murder so that he will be put to death while "innocent" and expose the flaws in fact.the system.

Top