Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Administrivia / ExamplesAreNotArguable

Go To

OR

Tabs MOD

Changed: 92

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
It's always a bad idea


Also, please don't add unnecessary subjectivity to objective tropes about characters by inserting examples that ''might'' apply to some viewers of a show or players of a game but don't appear within the work itself. Even if they're not marked Administrivia/InUniverseExamplesOnly, it's generally a bad idea.

to:

Also, please don't add unnecessary subjectivity to objective tropes about characters by inserting examples that ''might'' apply to some viewers of a show or players of a game but don't appear within the work itself. Even if they're not marked Administrivia/InUniverseExamplesOnly, it's generally a bad idea.
itself.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Per edit requests thread


When writing an example, don't precede it with words like "arguably", "possibly", or "to some". This is an example of WeaselWords, and although we are more tolerant of such than Wiki/ThatOtherWiki, in this case it weakens the foundation of the example by making it subjective. It is true that there may be disagreement between two or more tropers over whether or not a work uses a certain trope. That's fine. Misunderstandings happen. However, disputes about trope examples should be restricted to the discussion page or private messages, [[Administrivia/EditWar not the main article]].

to:

When writing an example, don't precede it with words like "arguably", "possibly", or "to some". This is an example of WeaselWords, and although we are more tolerant of such than Wiki/ThatOtherWiki, Website/ThatOtherWiki , in this case it weakens the foundation of the example by making it subjective. It is true that there may be disagreement between two or more tropers over whether or not a work uses a certain trope. That's fine. Misunderstandings happen. However, disputes about trope examples should be restricted to the discussion page or private messages, [[Administrivia/EditWar not the main article]].
Tabs MOD

Changed: 77

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
please do not have disputes via edit reasons


When writing an example, don't precede it with words like "arguably", "possibly", or "to some". This is an example of WeaselWords, and although we are more tolerant of such than Wiki/ThatOtherWiki, in this case it weakens the foundation of the example by making it subjective. It is true that there may be disagreement between two or more tropers over whether or not a work uses a certain trope. That's fine. Misunderstandings happen. However, disputes about trope examples should be restricted to edit reasons and the discussion page so it won't clutter up the main article.

to:

When writing an example, don't precede it with words like "arguably", "possibly", or "to some". This is an example of WeaselWords, and although we are more tolerant of such than Wiki/ThatOtherWiki, in this case it weakens the foundation of the example by making it subjective. It is true that there may be disagreement between two or more tropers over whether or not a work uses a certain trope. That's fine. Misunderstandings happen. However, disputes about trope examples should be restricted to edit reasons and the discussion page so it won't clutter up or private messages, [[Administrivia/EditWar not the main article.
article]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:


Sometimes a {{troper}} just isn't sure of whether or not a work uses a certain {{trope}}. They're positive that the work contains something worth mentioning, but just aren't sure whether or not it counts as an example of the trope. Or maybe they have an example from their favorite show that [[Administrivia/SquarePegRoundTrope doesn't quite fit the trope]], but is close to it and they want to add it as an example anyway. The result is usually something like this:

to:

Sometimes a {{troper}} troper just isn't sure of whether or not a work uses a certain {{trope}}. They're positive that the work contains something worth mentioning, but just aren't sure whether or not it counts as an example of the trope. Or maybe they have an example from their favorite show that [[Administrivia/SquarePegRoundTrope doesn't quite fit the trope]], but is close to it and they want to add it as an example anyway. The result is usually something like this:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Per edit requests thread


If you truly believe that your example fits the trope, then list it. If it's Administrivia/NotAnExample, then don't. If you aren't sure, ask about it in the discussion page or [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=13543987200A54420100 this forum thread]]. If you have an example but aren't sure what trope it's an example ''of'', list it [[ExamplesSearchingForATrope here]]. If the item in question has a "YMMV" banner on its article, it belongs on the [[YMMV.HomePage YMMV]] page. If "some people" have argued that a work is an example, chances are those people have no idea of how this wiki's definition of the trope differs from theirs.

to:

If you truly believe that your example fits the trope, then list it. If it's Administrivia/NotAnExample, then don't. If you aren't sure, ask about it in the discussion page or [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=13543987200A54420100 this forum thread]]. If you have an example but aren't sure what trope it's an example ''of'', list it [[ExamplesSearchingForATrope here]].ask on TropeFinder. If the item in question has a "YMMV" banner on its article, it belongs on the [[YMMV.HomePage YMMV]] page. If "some people" have argued that a work is an example, chances are those people have no idea of how this wiki's definition of the trope differs from theirs.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Sometimes a {{troper}} just isn't sure of whether or not a work uses a certain {{trope}}. They're positive that the work contains something worth mentioning, but just aren't sure whether or not it counts as an example of the trope. Or maybe they have an example from their favorite show that [[SquarePegRoundTrope doesn't quite fit the trope]], but is close to it and they want to add it as an example anyway. The result is usually something like this:

to:

Sometimes a {{troper}} just isn't sure of whether or not a work uses a certain {{trope}}. They're positive that the work contains something worth mentioning, but just aren't sure whether or not it counts as an example of the trope. Or maybe they have an example from their favorite show that [[SquarePegRoundTrope [[Administrivia/SquarePegRoundTrope doesn't quite fit the trope]], but is close to it and they want to add it as an example anyway. The result is usually something like this:



If you truly believe that your example fits the trope, then list it. If it's NotAnExample, then don't. If you aren't sure, ask about it in the discussion page or [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=13543987200A54420100 this forum thread]]. If you have an example but aren't sure what trope it's an example ''of'', list it [[ExamplesSearchingForATrope here]]. If the item in question has a "YMMV" banner on its article, it belongs on the [[YMMV.HomePage YMMV]] page. If "some people" have argued that a work is an example, chances are those people have no idea of how this wiki's definition of the trope differs from theirs.

to:

If you truly believe that your example fits the trope, then list it. If it's NotAnExample, Administrivia/NotAnExample, then don't. If you aren't sure, ask about it in the discussion page or [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=13543987200A54420100 this forum thread]]. If you have an example but aren't sure what trope it's an example ''of'', list it [[ExamplesSearchingForATrope here]]. If the item in question has a "YMMV" banner on its article, it belongs on the [[YMMV.HomePage YMMV]] page. If "some people" have argued that a work is an example, chances are those people have no idea of how this wiki's definition of the trope differs from theirs.

Top