Tropes
Media
Browse
Indexes
Forums
Videos
Join
Login
Tropes
Media
Browse
Indexes
Forums
Videos
Ask The Tropers
Trope Finder
Media Finder
Trope Launch Pad
Tech Wishlist
Reviews
Tools
Cut List
New Edits
Edit Reasons
Launches
Images List
Crowner Activity
Un-typed Pages
Recent Page Type Changes
Changelog
Tips
Creating New Redirects
Cross Wicking
Tips for Editing
Text Formatting Rules
Glossary
Edit Reasons
Handling Spoilers
Word Cruft
Administrivia
FAQ
Tropes HQ
About Us
Contact Us
Advertise
DMCA Notice
Privacy Policy
Report Bug
Go Ad-Free
Changelog
Show Spoilers
Night Vision
Sticky Header
Highlight Links
Follow TV Tropes
SugarWiki
DarthWiki
YMMV
WMG
Trivia
You need to
login
to do this.
Get Known
if you don't have an account
Markup View
Author: Topazan
Aug 18th 2011
at
6:28:09 AM
^^ I didn't include a description because I'm still working out how to expand this from the laconic. The idea is that in the western world, freedom is a concept associated with democracies, whereas more autocratic forms of government are associated with repression and totalitarianism. These dictators break the pattern by granting their populace as much or more freedom as a representative government would. I'm not expert in political science, but it seems unlikely in the real world for a couple of reasons. Most modern dictatorships find it necessary to employ an oppressive police presence to maintain their power, reducing personal freedom in the process. One thing that makes it interesting in fiction is the motivation of the ruler. He apparently believes that people can be trusted to run their own lives, but not their own government. ^ Please don't get too caught up on semantics. This is not necessarily about the political philosophy of Libertarianism, I just used that word to indicate that the population enjoys a relatively high degree of liberty under these dictators. If you have a better idea for a name, please suggest it. That said, I think that quote in no way counts against Vetinari's inclusion. That "One man, one vote" thing only shows that Vetinari is, in fact, a dictator with absolute fiat. It's what he does with that fiat that decides whether or not he counts for this trope. Seeing as Ankh-Morpork enjoys free markets, freedom of press, freedom of religion, rights of the accused, and a multitude of other protections, I'd say he counts. He constantly threatens to abuse his power, but aside from that throw away joke about the mimes, he never actually does.
Show Spoilers
Night Vision
Sticky Header
Wide Load
Important Links
Ask The Tropers
Trope Finder
Media Finder
Trope Launch Pad
Tech Wishlist
Reviews
Go Ad Free!
Crucial Browsing
Genre
Action Adventure
Comedy
Commercials
Crime & Punishment
Drama
Horror
Love
News
Professional Wrestling
Speculative Fiction
Sports Story
War
Live Blogs
Media
All Media
Animation (Western)
Anime
Comic Book
Fan Fics
Film
Game
Literature
Music And Sound Effects
New Media
Print Media
Radio
Sequential Art
Tabletop Games
Television
Theater
Videogame
Webcomics
Narrative
Universal
Applied Phlebotinum
Characterization
Characters
Characters As Device
Dialogue
Motifs
Narrative Devices
Paratext
Plots
Settings
Spectacle
Other Categories
British Telly
The Contributors
Creator Speak
Creators
Derivative Works
Language
Laws And Formulas
Show Business
Split Personality
Stock Room
Trope
Tropes
Truth And Lies
Truth In Television
Topical Tropes
Betrayal
Censorship
Combat
Death
Family
Fate And Prophecy
Food
Holiday
Memory
Money
Morality
Politics
Religion
School
Resources
Tools
Wiki Tools
Cut List
New Edits
Edit Reasons
Isolated Pages
Launches
Images List
Recent Videos
Crowner Activity
Un-typed Pages
Recent Page Type Changes
Templates
Trope Entry
Works
Character Sheet
Playing With
Fandom
Tips
Creating New Redirects
Cross Wicking
Tips for Editing
Text Formatting Rules
Glossary
Edit Reasons
Handling Spoilers
Word Cruft
Administrivia
FAQ
Changelog
Report Bug
Trope Repair Shop
Image Pickin'
Advertisement:
Top