I'm inclined to agree with Jekkal. This comic has moments of brilliance, yes, but the preachyness of the comic is starting to get out of hand. I wouldn't mind the walls of text as much if it wasn't so clearly coming from the author's mouth instead of the character's mouth. Never are the two main characters countered in any of their opinions, and seem to project a disappointingly elitist view of things.
Oh well, plenty of other comics left which haven't turned into Author Tracts...
I was going to put up a mega-short review of this shoddy crap, but you said it best with 'roughly equivalent to the plot of a porno'.
Very horrible. I couldn't even get through ONE strip without seeing enough pretentiousness that would make Twilight seem light.
My opinion is essentially that the comic is a Guilty Pleasure. The author goes on long, tangential rants, and seems to have a highly inflated sense of himself, but there are times that the comic can be mildly entertaining, and some of the victims have mildly interesting stories. I went on a single Archive Binge a long time ago, but haven't checked the comic again more than once, and only to find that the story had barely been advanced.
Without music, life would be a mistake. -Friedrich NietzscheWhy do everyone on this site like this comic?
HEYOOO!Leave a Comment:
Best Read all at Once, if at all
Rating: I used to enjoy the comic, and don't anymore.
The concept is vaguely satisfying, and even a little exciting in the SAW-esque slapstick sense (complicated death traps that are inevitably inescapable, and unlike recent SAW films, still manage to fit the "crimes" involved), but more than a few things ruin the comic in practice:
The first two are bad enough from a user experience perspective; the third reinforces that the actual moral quandaries in the comic are roughly equivalent to the plot of a porno. Either way, read up to the end of whatever arc you like, then stop. It's easier that way.