The "science is bad" subverted entry is heavily editorialized (as of June 2021), like the author is emotionally involved in the outcome (that the trope is subverted). I might also point out that the argument made for the trope being subverted is quite flimsy and open to debate, especially as it seems to rely on circumstance.
The "science is bad" subverted entry is heavily editorialized (as of June 2021), like the author is emotionally involved in the outcome (that the trope is subverted). I might also point out that the argument made for the trope being subverted is quite flimsy and open to debate, especially as it seems to rely on circumstance.