Should the Legend of Zelda: Oracle games really be the page image? I mean, they are two separate games, despite the linking. I think a picture of Pokemon games would make more sense.
Hide / Show Replies
They're the ones where we had a snazzy magazine ad that clearly and concisely exemplifies the trope. The Pokemon images we found weren't as good. Remember, the page image isn't for the best example, it's for the best visual illustration of the trope.
Rhymes with "Protracted."
I can understand that, except that the Oracle games are not actually an example of this trope in the first place. There's got to be a picture that's almost as good for a game that actually belongs here.
Okay no no no, the oracle games are not even CLOSE to an example of it. Pokemon is much easier to know of, much more recognizable, and overall an actual example. The oracle games are COMPLETELY different from each other. The only thing similar is the mechanics, and the trade system. But the actual plots and items and dungeons and literally everything else is completely different.
It was selected by crowner
here. Also, using ALLCAPS when making an argument just makes it weaker.
When there is no easy way for <b>bold</b>, <i>italic</i> or <u>underline</u> options, you gotta use capitalization to emphasize certain words and put forth your point. So you are WRONG.
Edited by _Dog
Previous Trope Repair Shop thread: Needs Help, started by petrie911 on Aug 1st 2012 at 7:30:33 PM
Previous Trope Repair Shop thread: Ambiguous Name, started by KarjamP on Aug 29th 2013 at 11:57:52 AM
Should Old Save Bonus get a mention among the similar tropes? Seems like a similar concept, where the expectation is (or at least can be, depending on the implementation) for the player to purchase and play through at least two games with the same character, though the overlap is much smaller.