What's Happening

Troperville

Tools

collapse/expand topics ykttw archive back to Main/ItAmusedMe

Miharu
topic
08:29:18 AM May 4th 2014
I have trouble placing evil acts done out of sadism anywhere. By instinct, I would say that it would be "It amused me", but the description sounds like the character cannot actually be an evil person or a villain for the trope to apply. While "For the evulz" says that the character does things "only because they are evil" and would even do them if they were self-destructive. So where does a villain fit who thinks of his/her own advantage, but also does things that harm others "for fun"? ?__? Ain't that actually quite common among villains? Both tropes sound as if they wanted to shove that kind of behaviour into the other trope, so none really offers a fitting description for it.
Meiriona
topic
05:12:33 PM Sep 30th 2013
Is there any possibility this trope has connections to immortality related morality disconnect or is that just that it correlates so often with The Fair Folk tropes?

or is this just apophenia hitting me again?
sdmitch16
topic
12:39:21 AM Dec 26th 2012
Is there a trope namer?
UncleBubba
08:29:55 PM Jan 1st 2013
This could be called "The Hunter S. Thompson Memorial Trope" without fear of rebuttal or positing of a better, methinks.
Teeth
topic
04:30:03 PM Jan 25th 2011
Why was For The Lulz considered an inappropriate title for this trope, while a variation, For the Evulz, is a-okay?
SuiCaedere
08:19:57 PM Feb 8th 2011
Because people keep misusing it...
Glixinator
07:08:37 PM Aug 20th 2011
Also, For The Lulz could be interpreted to mean that it was done to make OTHERS laugh, while It Amused Me makes it clear that it is only how funny it is to the person performing the action that matters. However I am also curious as to the current Trope Namer since I know the phrase appears word for word in Reboot, but since that show is itself a parody I can't be sure if it is an original creation of that show, or whether a citation of the Trope Namer should be attributed to whatever work Reboot was pariodying in that instance, if any.
MAI742
08:08:29 AM Sep 10th 2011
I have worked over For the Evulz and It Amused Me. The definitions should be more clear-cut now and I've tried to define both in similar terms to each other so it's clear what is what. Blame me if there's a problem.
MrMous
topic
08:45:25 AM Oct 26th 2010
Can anyone recall the lines from family guy when Carter made Peter eat a pine cone? That would make a great title quote.- "Eat it!- it will amuse me."
Caswin
topic
04:18:16 PM Jul 30th 2010
I just want to clarify: Is the qualifier for For the Evulz just how evil the act is? Because, just to use the example in the introduction, making someone believe that they are about to die for your own amusement sounds pretty evil, and many of the examples aren't far behind. Maybe I have different views on where making someone's day (or life) worse out of boredom falls than the original author, but the line seems blurry as all get out.
Steven
03:21:01 PM Feb 10th 2012
For the Evulz is about someone who does heinous and evil acts just for the sake of being an evil bastard. In other words, if someone goes and captures people and makes them his slaves so it would make him look evil, then that trope qualifies. It can certainly cross over with It Amused Me if the person does evil acts for amusement. Don't forget the It Amused Me trope is when someone does something just for amusement, whether it is harmless or not.
ykttw archive back to Main/ItAmusedMe

TV Tropes by TV Tropes Foundation, LLC is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available from thestaff@tvtropes.org.
Privacy Policy