Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion Main / GlobalWarming

Go To

You will be notified by PM when someone responds to your discussion
Type the word in the image. This goes away if you get known.
If you can't read this one, hit reload for the page.
The next one might be easier to see.
Commander_Ysenir Since: Mar, 2015
Nov 7th 2020 at 4:12:24 PM •••

You know what, I'm just gonna say it. I'm tired of things like climate silence where we cater to "skeptics" who refuse to acknowledge science. There shouldn't be a ban on Real Life examples.

Emberfist Supreme Overlord of Luxemburg Since: Nov, 2018
Supreme Overlord of Luxemburg
Jan 31st 2019 at 6:46:29 AM •••

Call of Duty: Black Ops III needs to be added as Global Warming plays a key part in the game's backstory. The most visible example is in Egypt where it is mentioned that part of the reason for the Lotus Towers that are border on being Vertical Cities are that the Sahara Desert is claiming many of the of the outlying settlements and Nile River is drying up (not helped by the NRC's dam projects which is why there are at war). The Aquifer from the level Sand Castle was also a result of being a failed attempt to harvest ground water for the Egyptian population when the Nile started drying up.

I am one with the force. the force is with me
Vampyricon Since: Aug, 2015
Apr 24th 2017 at 8:36:25 AM •••

I don't understand why Rule of Cautious Editing Judgment applies here. I'd understand if this were applied to solutions to global warming since it's a political/social issue. But it is already mentioned in the text that the science has been settled. Data shows a strong correlation between atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations and temperatures. The facts are not in dispute. We don't have the same caution for evolutionary theory or Flat World. Why do we have it for this?

Edited by Vampyricon
Sol9000 GammaWALLE Since: Aug, 2011
GammaWALLE
Aug 19th 2011 at 1:12:15 PM •••

WALL-E Totally needs to be added as an example

Hide / Show Replies
aranamor Since: Apr, 2011
Nov 15th 2011 at 1:44:11 PM •••

WALL-E was less global warning and more Trash of the Titans, at least explicitly.

T Vtropes is NOT Wikipedia, stop trying to make it that. I'm attacking the darkness!
188.28.60.47 Since: Dec, 1969
Dec 1st 2010 at 2:24:03 AM •••

I don't know how exactly do that but it would be worth mentioning that the cause and exact shape of climat changes tend to be controversial topic. I find many people studying technical-but-not-directly-related subject sceptical about human caused climat changes. It also included some people I met from directly related (solar cycles) areas (although underlining that he is not specialist and this is complex issue he is not specialised in).

I am not sure how to do it under Rule Of Cautious Editing Judgment so I post it on forum that it might be benefitial to mention the controversy (stating that the human-cause global warming is consensus among climatologies). The sceptics are at least cultural phenomena.

Hide / Show Replies
TBeholder Since: Jan, 2001
Jul 28th 2011 at 9:58:59 AM •••

It looks like in America, sceptical views are mostly cultural phenomena.
Let's look at an example at Albany University's site. So, the Important side in the incident was: "there was nothing heroic about exposing Blondlot. The American was a spy for the British in the continuing chauvinistic science of Europeans. It was the British and the Germans against the French, and the French lost points in this exchange." What's left as the Unimportant side: whether N-Rays do exist. The current second link on the front page: "Careers Built on UAlbany Atmospheric Sciences Quality & Opportunities". No comment. :]

...And even I make no pretense Of having more than common sense - R.W.Wood
Top