This one is a bit more ambiguous:
• Furthermore, All For One can't outright destroy any of the Quirks he acquires, just keep them and then pass them on. This bites him in the ass hard when he takes Star and Stripe's New Order after killing her; before dying, Star placed a rule on it that made it rebel against All For One and attack all of the other Quirks inside of him when he takes it. He has no way to get rid of it without someone to pass it on to, so it just proceeds to whoop his ass from the inside.
Does this qualify as a Logical Weakness? Because while an inability to get rid of the Quirks that he has can be considered an aversion of Required Secondary Powers, it can also come across as a separate power that he happens to not have access to. Just because his power gives and takes Quirks doesn't necessarily imply that he can get rid of them at will any more than, say, a light switch being able to turn a light off and on implies that it is a dimmer switch. I won't edit it out because this is much more plausible than the Gigantomachina entry, but I do still feel the need to question its validity.
This is my first time using the Discussion page, so tell me if I did something wrong.
I have a question about this entry:
• Gigantomachia is massive, incredibly tough, and nearly unstoppable, but he still has to breathe and is presumably as vulnerable to Midnight's sleep gas as anyone else. "Presumably" because the villains don't give Midnight the chance to try and take her out while Gigantomachia is on the rampage, forcing her to tell Yaoyorozu to create anesthesia drugs to make him ingest and hopefully knock him out. However, even when the students successfully make him eat one large vial, Gigantomachia's sheer vitality lets him shrug the effects off and keep going on the warpath for a little while longer.
Namely, how does this fit on the "Logical Weakness" page? Gigantomachina's weakness to sedatives and anesthetics aren't a logical weakness of his powers. His abilities don't make him more susceptible to the gas than anyone else. Logical weaknesses are for when a character's powers make them more susceptible to a particular thing than other people, not when they're just as affected by something as everyone else usually is.
Edited by A2230
Okay, so I’ve noticed a few issues with the AFO folder. I want to alter/delete a bunch of them, but I'd like to get other people's two cents on them first.
Firstly, and correct me if I’m wrong, but Logical Weaknesses are meant to be weaknesses of the “power” and not the “character,” right? Because I feel like quite a few of these entries just point out AFO’s flaws.
This is a weakness brought about by the lack of powers, rather than the powers themselves.
This straight-up isn’t a logical weakness.
I’ve deleted a similar entry in the past. Lacking a superpower that someone else happens to have is not a Logical Weakness. Or at least as far as I can tell. His Quirk is that he takes Quirks. Nothing about that implies that the Quirks he takes should be empowered.
This seems like it toes the line. While it is logical that they took advantage of the fat that Warp Gate was more powerful than AFO’s warping Quirk, it doesn’t seem like a logical weakness for one power to simply be weaker than the other one.
These needs rephrasing for clarity’s sake. Why doesn’t AFO’s Super Regeneration help him with his life support? What loophole in the power is keeping it from doing that? What are examples of these “physical limits” AFO is reaching?
Regeneration was already mentioned. Also, this seems more like an example of superpowers having limits, rather than a logical weakness.
This is a deconstruction of Unskilled But Strong, but not a logical weakness of the power(s) itself.
These seem more like personality flaws and not logical weaknesses. Things to put under a "Fatal Flaw" entry instead of a "Logical Weakness" entry.