SeptimusHeap
MOD
(Edited uphill both ways)
Jul 7th 2014 at 12:39:28 AM
•••
They don't strike me as that opinionated. Now if they are factually inaccurate, correct them, sure.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Jabroniville
Since: Jan, 2001
Jul 26th 2015 at 11:16:15 PM
•••
I fixed some of them up, as they were getting ridiculous, with various insults thrown about that went out of line. The characters DO have flaws, and I'll happily comment on THOSE, however. But let's not act like the kids weren't bratty snots back in the day.
Tuckerscreator
(4 Score & 7 Years Ago)
Jul 26th 2015 at 11:21:07 PM
•••
If it means anything now, a while back on Ask The Tropers I asked to purge the page and start over, and Fighteer agreed to cut it (but it wasn't, for some reason.) The troper who added most of the examples was also banned. Glad to see there's been improvement to this page now.
Okay...can we have character descriptions that don't pander to the Foobiverse Journal crowd? These all read like they're more interested in deriding than describing the characters. Extremely YMMV in tone and content.
I'm not saying these opinions don't deserve to be heard, just that they'd be a better fit on a sub page.
Hide / Show Replies