[003]
99.67.225.30
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I\'m wondering if, perhaps, the Pro Wrestling section should be removed altogether. There are far too many entries on that page which seem to just fall under \
to:
I\\\'m wondering if, perhaps, the Pro Wrestling section should be seriously trimmed or removed altogether. There are far too many entries on that page which seem to just fall under \\\"morally questionable\\\" rather than \\\"bad\\\", even though the main page clearly states that simply being offensive isn\\\'t enough. There are also very few examples of genuinely poor matches, promotions and angles. For example, the \\\"Fingerpoke Of Doom\\\" would probably fall more under WallBanger, because while it might\\\'ve been a bone-headed move on WCW\\\'s part, I don\\\'t think it was ever notorious for being a terribly acted/executed match across the board. I would think this page should really be for matches that are notorious for their bad execution (ie. where the wrestlers/writers/etc. clearly weren\\\'t even trying) and for badly run wrestling promotions. Not fan alienating decisions or morally questionable acts.
What does everybody else think?
What does everybody else think?
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I\'m wondering if, perhaps, the Pro Wrestling section should be removed altogether. There are far too many entries on that page which seem to just fall under \
to:
I\\\'m wondering if, perhaps, the Pro Wrestling section should be removed altogether. There are far too many entries on that page which seem to just fall under \\\"morally questionable\\\" rather than \\\"bad\\\", even though the main page clearly states that simply being offensive isn\\\'t enough. There are also very few examples of genuinely poor matches, promotions and angles. For example, the \\\"Fingerpoke Of Doom\\\" would probably fall more under WallBanger, because while it might\\\'ve been a bone-headed move on WCW\\\'s part, I don\\\'t think it was ever notorious for being a terribly acted/executed match across the board. I would think this page should really be for matches that are notorious for their bad execution (ie. where the wrestlers/writers/etc. clearly weren\\\'t even trying) and for badly run wrestling promotions. Not fan alienating decisions or morally questionable acts.
I think the page should either be seriously trimmed/modified or removed altogether. What does everybody else think?
I think the page should either be seriously trimmed/modified or removed altogether. What does everybody else think?
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I\'m wondering if, perhaps, the Pro Wrestling section should be removed altogether. There are far too many entries on that page which seem to just fall under \
to:
I\\\'m wondering if, perhaps, the Pro Wrestling section should be removed altogether. There are far too many entries on that page which seem to just fall under \\\"morally questionable\\\" rather than \\\"bad\\\", even though the main page clearly states that simply being offensive isn\\\'t enough. There are also very few examples of genuinely poor matches, promotions and angles. For example, the \\\"Fingerpoke Of Doom\\\" would probably fall more under WallBanger, because while it might\\\'ve been a bone-headed decision on WCW\\\'s part, I don\\\'t think it was ever notorious for being a terribly acted/executed match across the board. I would think this page should really be for matches that are notorious for their bad execution (ie. where the wrestlers/writers/etc. clearly weren\\\'t even trying) and for badly run wrestling promotions. Not fan alienating decisions or morally questionable acts.
I think the page should either be seriously trimmed/modified or removed altogether. What does everybody else think?
I think the page should either be seriously trimmed/modified or removed altogether. What does everybody else think?
