[003]
87.110.86.38
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
The Main Page refers the reader to the OtherWiki for Real Life examples (which is disappointing, but I\'m guessing the RuleOfCautiousEditing is in effect), but doen\'t actually link to a page (and the other wiki, quite natrually, doesn\'t have a FascistButInefficient \'\'page\'\'). Does anyone know what page they did mean?
to:
The Main Page refers the reader to the OtherWiki for Real Life examples (which is disappointing, but I\\\'m guessing the RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment is in effect), but doen\\\'t actually link to a page (and the other wiki, quite natrually, doesn\\\'t have a FascistButInefficient \\\'\\\'page\\\'\\\'). Does anyone know what page they did mean?
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
The Main Page refers the reader to the OtherWiki for Real Life examples (which is disappointing, but I\'m guessing the RuleOfCautiousEditing is in effect), but doen\'t actually link to a page (and the other wiki, quite natrually, doesn\'t have a FascistButInefficient \'page\'). Does anyone know what page they did mean?
to:
The Main Page refers the reader to the OtherWiki for Real Life examples (which is disappointing, but I\\\'m guessing the RuleOfCautiousEditing is in effect), but doen\\\'t actually link to a page (and the other wiki, quite natrually, doesn\\\'t have a FascistButInefficient \\\'\\\'page\\\'\\\'). Does anyone know what page they did mean?
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Checking The Metal Observer, their two reviews approach it from two different perspectives - that of a pissed of death metalhead and that of a more open-minded semi-fan of Industrial/Groove. The former (naturally) marks it at 1.5/10. The latter actually marks it at 7/10. Even if TMO falls under CausticCritic status or otherwise doesn\'t count as a \
to:
Checking The Metal Observer, their two reviews approach it from two different perspectives - that of a pissed of death metalhead and that of a more open-minded semi-fan of Industrial/Groove. The former (naturally) [[http://www.metal-observer.com/articles.php?lid=1&sid=1&id=18186 marks it at 1.5/10]]. The latter actually [[http://www.metal-observer.com/articles.php?lid=1&sid=1&id=18288 marks it at 7/10]]. Even if TMO falls under CausticCritic status or otherwise doesn\\\'t count as a \\\"professional\\\" source for the purposes of SBIH, I\\\'d say they still demonstrates that \\\'\\\'Illud\\\'\\\' doesn\\\'t fit here.
