[002]
Andaria
Current Version
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
1. Irene still working for Moriarty. The first film had provided a very good reason why she wouldn\'t work him again and why she wouldn\'t be at odds with Holmes anymore. And the previous film had at least somewhat implied that she was beyond killing innocent people. Or her death considering that she and Holmes had played the \
to:
1. Irene still working for Moriarty. The first film had provided a very good reason why she wouldn\\\'t work him again and why she wouldn\\\'t be at odds with Holmes anymore. And the previous film had at least somewhat implied that she was beyond killing innocent people. Or her death considering that she and Holmes had played the \\\"I\\\'ve drugged your drink\\\" game two times before.
2. That fucking bird-metaphor fight.
3. The wireless-remote-transmitter from the first film not factoring into the plot at all. Seriously? That was the one really important thing I was waiting for.
The rest kind of boils down to stronger opinions, Moriarty being kind of a let-down as a villain with really simple goals (profits from war do not interest me as much as his schemes in the Red Headed League and selling a forged Mona Lisa). The Simza-Rene subplot feeling really tacked on in order to add a female character to the film, and then there\\\'s Holmes being all zen master at the beginning which instead of calling back to his deductive mind made him into some sort of superhero. Also Mycroft added nothing to the film and that scene with his nakedness was completely unfunny and instead very stupid.
I will give credit where it\\\'s due. Despite not utilizing the scenery as well as the first film, it had some nice cinematography. And the historical aspect made the film interesting to watch.
2. That fucking bird-metaphor fight.
3. The wireless-remote-transmitter from the first film not factoring into the plot at all. Seriously? That was the one really important thing I was waiting for.
The rest kind of boils down to stronger opinions, Moriarty being kind of a let-down as a villain with really simple goals (profits from war do not interest me as much as his schemes in the Red Headed League and selling a forged Mona Lisa). The Simza-Rene subplot feeling really tacked on in order to add a female character to the film, and then there\\\'s Holmes being all zen master at the beginning which instead of calling back to his deductive mind made him into some sort of superhero. Also Mycroft added nothing to the film and that scene with his nakedness was completely unfunny and instead very stupid.
I will give credit where it\\\'s due. Despite not utilizing the scenery as well as the first film, it had some nice cinematography. And the historical aspect made the film interesting to watch.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
1. Irene still working for Moriarty. The first film had provided a very good reason why she wouldn\'t work him again and why she wouldn\'t be at odds with Holmes anymore. And the previous film had at least somewhat implied that she was beyond killing innocent people. Or her death considering that she and Holmes
to:
1. Irene still working for Moriarty. The first film had provided a very good reason why she wouldn\\\'t work him again and why she wouldn\\\'t be at odds with Holmes anymore. And the previous film had at least somewhat implied that she was beyond killing innocent people. Or her death considering that she and Holmes had played the \\\"I\\\'ve drugged your drink\\\" game two times before.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
3. The wireless-remote-transmitter from the first film not factoring into the plot at all. Seriously? That was the one really important thing I was waiting for.
to:
