Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
There are no real indications in the work or outside it how the scene is \
to:
There are no solid indications in the work or outside it how the scene is \\\"meant\\\" to be interpreted (yours are flimsy, at best). Thus, we can\\\'t call an audience reaction of MisaimedFandom on it.
Second, I am not the only person telling you it is a bad edit. You focusing on me and attacking me personally won\\\'t change that. Two other people people here in this very discussion topic have agreed with me. I may not have more \\\"power\\\" than you, but I do have much more experience maintaining pages and spotting bad edits (and correcting them). Yours is yet another in a long, long line of them that I\\\'ve seen. The only difference here is that you refuse to admit it\\\'s a bad edit, making my job that much harder. Wikis work on consensus - and you are one person against several.
If it will make you feel better about it, I have no problem calling in a mod to form a final opinion on the edit, though. If you can\\\'t accept my word and experience on it, perhaps that will be enough.
Second, I am not the only person telling you it is a bad edit. You focusing on me and attacking me personally won\\\'t change that. Two other people people here in this very discussion topic have agreed with me. I may not have more \\\"power\\\" than you, but I do have much more experience maintaining pages and spotting bad edits (and correcting them). Yours is yet another in a long, long line of them that I\\\'ve seen. The only difference here is that you refuse to admit it\\\'s a bad edit, making my job that much harder. Wikis work on consensus - and you are one person against several.
If it will make you feel better about it, I have no problem calling in a mod to form a final opinion on the edit, though. If you can\\\'t accept my word and experience on it, perhaps that will be enough.
[001]
ccoa
MOD
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
There are no indications in the work or outside it how the scene is \
to:
There are no real indications in the work or outside it how the scene is \\\"meant\\\" to be interpreted (yours are flimsy, at best). Thus, we can\\\'t call an audience reaction of MisaimedFandom on it.
Second, I am not the only person telling you it is a bad edit. You focusing on me and attacking me personally won\\\'t change that. Two other people people here in this very discussion topic have agreed with me. I may not have more \\\"power\\\" than you, but I do have much more experience maintaining pages and spotting bad edits (and correcting them). Yours is yet another in a long, long line of them that I\\\'ve seen. The only difference here is that you refuse to admit it\\\'s a bad edit, making my job that much harder. Wikis work on consensus - and you are one person against several.
If it will make you feel better about it, I have no problem calling in a mod to form a final opinion on the edit, though. If you can\\\'t accept my word and experience on it, perhaps that will be enough.
Second, I am not the only person telling you it is a bad edit. You focusing on me and attacking me personally won\\\'t change that. Two other people people here in this very discussion topic have agreed with me. I may not have more \\\"power\\\" than you, but I do have much more experience maintaining pages and spotting bad edits (and correcting them). Yours is yet another in a long, long line of them that I\\\'ve seen. The only difference here is that you refuse to admit it\\\'s a bad edit, making my job that much harder. Wikis work on consensus - and you are one person against several.
If it will make you feel better about it, I have no problem calling in a mod to form a final opinion on the edit, though. If you can\\\'t accept my word and experience on it, perhaps that will be enough.
