[008]
PersonaTroper
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
*Sigh*
to:
*Sigh*
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Well, there\'s a warning sign: You self-identify as a WikiCurator so you wont apologize for your actions. I read that page, and from what I can tell from that it basically means you occasionally check a page to make sure people don\'t do dumb stuff on it. In my opinion, the title is going a little to your head and the ability to call yourself a WikiCurator seems to give you an inflated opinion of yourself where you view yourself as some kind of authority on what is and isn\'t a good edit beyond the rest of us. So much so, that the entire way you\'ve been \
to:
Well, there\\\'s a warning sign: You self-identify as a WikiCurator so you wont apologize for your actions. I read that page, and from what I can tell from that it basically means you occasionally check a page to make sure people don\\\'t do dumb stuff on it. In my opinion, the title is going a little to your head and the ability to call yourself a WikiCurator seems to give you an inflated opinion of yourself where you view yourself as some kind of authority on what is and isn\\\'t a good edit beyond the rest of us. So much so, that the entire way you\\\'ve been \\\"discussing\\\" with me is by passing down various judgments on why my post is meaningless to your eyes.
An ordinary person would understand it would be good to try to talk things through and reach an understanding. A self-appointed authority such as yourself just likes to pass judgment on why I\\\'m wrong and will try to bulldoze your way past everything I am saying. This is the impression I am getting from you, and like you so brazenly said, you are not going to apologize for that.
Now about MisaimedFandom, I\\\'ve explained that there is evidence (passing out, not remembering what happened last night, serious drunkenness, and a rather plausible case for getting drinks) you have to overlook in order to see it as \\\"they weren\\\'t actually drinking\\\" and the game has a theme of \\\"don\\\'t overlook unanswered questions\\\" and \\\"don\\\'t take the easy way out.\\\" Sure there isn\\\'t an official word on the subject (and I ain\\\'t sure there will be: I hear Japan has rules against depicting underage drinking, esp. when you make it look \\\'\\\'really fun.\\\'\\\'), but I think my interpretation is very plausible and legitimate enough. You say I\\\'m misusing the trope by putting it on the \\\"Your Mileage May Vary\\\" tab because not everyone agrees with me. But as I see it, that\\\'s exactly what qualifies it for the YMMV tab.
Next you tell me the entry is bad because it\\\'s long and full of justifications. I agree it\\\'s a little long and has a bunch of justifications, but I disagree that\\\'s bad because this is about \\\'\\\'detective work\\\'\\\'. Plus, I\\\'ve already cut down on it to make it shorter. Also, when you say my entry is full of \\\"word cruft,\\\" I\\\'m raising an eyebrow, \\\'cause honestly word cruft is such a freebie when you want a silly excuse for saying someone is doing it wrong. I think \\\'\\\'your post\\\'\\\' is full of word cruft. Right now, there is just as much reason to what I say about your post as what you say about my entry. If it\\\'s long and wordy or crufty, let me know where and how it\\\'s a problem, so I can fix it. Stop using them as excuses to keep deleting this over and over again.
On to the first person thing, for crying out loud, again, tell me what\\\'s the problem with my use of it. I\\\'m just being informal here, and you know it.
And last, you\\\'re telling me \\\"It better belongs on WMG or Just Bugs Me, plain and simple.\\\" The \\\"plain and simple\\\" proves to me you\\\'re not trying to reach an understanding or talk this through. You just want to pass judgment and end it there. You\\\'re not being helpful. You don\\\'t even try to be. You\\\'re almost trying to be the opposite: A stone wall.
*Exhales* \\\'\\\'Sheeesh.\\\'\\\'
Okay, next time you go do your edit and posting thing, I want you to remember the following:
#You are \\\'\\\'an ordinary person.\\\'\\\' You\\\'re not better than me or anyone else here (and I don\\\'t think I\\\'m better than anyone either). You have no special rights to make decisions for the rest of us.
#When you think there is a problem, \\\'\\\'you have to explain \\\'\\\'\\\'where\\\'\\\'\\\' the problem is and \\\'\\\'\\\'why\\\'\\\'\\\' it\\\'s a problem.\\\'\\\'
If you don\\\'t keep this in mind, I don\\\'t think there\\\'s much hope in trying to resolve this with you.
*Exhales again*
Sorry if I\\\'m giving you a hard time. And please, try not to take anything too personally.
Thank you, and I hope you have a nice day.
An ordinary person would understand it would be good to try to talk things through and reach an understanding. A self-appointed authority such as yourself just likes to pass judgment on why I\\\'m wrong and will try to bulldoze your way past everything I am saying. This is the impression I am getting from you, and like you so brazenly said, you are not going to apologize for that.
Now about MisaimedFandom, I\\\'ve explained that there is evidence (passing out, not remembering what happened last night, serious drunkenness, and a rather plausible case for getting drinks) you have to overlook in order to see it as \\\"they weren\\\'t actually drinking\\\" and the game has a theme of \\\"don\\\'t overlook unanswered questions\\\" and \\\"don\\\'t take the easy way out.\\\" Sure there isn\\\'t an official word on the subject (and I ain\\\'t sure there will be: I hear Japan has rules against depicting underage drinking, esp. when you make it look \\\'\\\'really fun.\\\'\\\'), but I think my interpretation is very plausible and legitimate enough. You say I\\\'m misusing the trope by putting it on the \\\"Your Mileage May Vary\\\" tab because not everyone agrees with me. But as I see it, that\\\'s exactly what qualifies it for the YMMV tab.
Next you tell me the entry is bad because it\\\'s long and full of justifications. I agree it\\\'s a little long and has a bunch of justifications, but I disagree that\\\'s bad because this is about \\\'\\\'detective work\\\'\\\'. Plus, I\\\'ve already cut down on it to make it shorter. Also, when you say my entry is full of \\\"word cruft,\\\" I\\\'m raising an eyebrow, \\\'cause honestly word cruft is such a freebie when you want a silly excuse for saying someone is doing it wrong. I think \\\'\\\'your post\\\'\\\' is full of word cruft. Right now, there is just as much reason to what I say about your post as what you say about my entry. If it\\\'s long and wordy or crufty, let me know where and how it\\\'s a problem, so I can fix it. Stop using them as excuses to keep deleting this over and over again.
On to the first person thing, for crying out loud, again, tell me what\\\'s the problem with my use of it. I\\\'m just being informal here, and you know it.
And last, you\\\'re telling me \\\"It better belongs on WMG or Just Bugs Me, plain and simple.\\\" The \\\"plain and simple\\\" proves to me you\\\'re not trying to reach an understanding or talk this through. You just want to pass judgment and end it there. You\\\'re not being helpful. You don\\\'t even try to be. You\\\'re almost trying to be the opposite: A stone wall.
*Exhales* \\\'\\\'Sheeesh.\\\'\\\'
Okay, next time you go do your edit and posting thing, I want you to remember the following:
#You are \\\'\\\'an ordinary person.\\\'\\\' You\\\'re not better than me or anyone else here (and I don\\\'t think I\\\'m better than anyone either). You have no special rights to make decisions for the rest of us.
#When you think there is a problem, \\\'\\\'you have to explain \\\'\\\'\\\'where\\\'\\\'\\\' the problem is and \\\'\\\'\\\'why\\\'\\\'\\\' it\\\'s a problem.\\\'\\\'
If you don\\\'t keep this in mind, I don\\\'t think there\\\'s much hope in trying to resolve this with you.
*Exhales again*
Sorry if I\\\'m giving you a hard time. And please, try not to take anything too personally.
Thank you, and I hope you have a nice day.
