[001]
helterskelter
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Sorry--I removed that because it was a recent addition and not a result of the efforts of thousands of tropers who have seen this page and made it that way. It was also the questionable validity of saying \
to:
Sorry--I removed that because it was a recent addition and not a result of the efforts of thousands of tropers who have seen this page and made it that way. It was also the questionable validity of saying \\\"this generally popular internet website with a particular demographic loves this guy their demographic is targeted towards\\\". Or that AskMen.com is somehow influential or important to sufficiently discredit far more influential or important [[FoxNews media]] (even if I dislike and do not agree with them) saying otherwise.
Honestly, the Internet loves Jon Stewart. Us tropers do, as a whole, too. As pointed out above, WikiMagic defines what is good and bad. If universally we seem to love him, the page will reflect that. Same way we hate {{North}}.
It\\\'s not that I wouldn\\\'t argue for a bit more of a neutral-but-still-positive article, I just don\\\'t think I\\\'m up to that endeavor.
Honestly, the Internet loves Jon Stewart. Us tropers do, as a whole, too. As pointed out above, WikiMagic defines what is good and bad. If universally we seem to love him, the page will reflect that. Same way we hate {{North}}.
It\\\'s not that I wouldn\\\'t argue for a bit more of a neutral-but-still-positive article, I just don\\\'t think I\\\'m up to that endeavor.
