[003]
ThePantherMan
Current Version
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
Look, I get it. When it comes to morality, Edelgard isn’t exactly Superman or Captain America, or Marth and Chrom if we use Fire Emblem examples. Even on Crimson Flower, she still actively conquers the neutral Alliance. I get that. But this throwaway line would take it to a whole other level for Crimson Flower Edelgard. If Hanneman really says this line, it was a terrible idea on the writers’ part.
to:
Look, I get it. When it comes to morality, Edelgard isn’t exactly Superman or Captain America, or Marth and Chrom if we use Fire Emblem examples. Even on Crimson Flower, she still actively conquers the neutral Alliance and pins the blame for Arianrhod’s destruction on the Church. I get that. But this throwaway line would take it to a whole other level for Crimson Flower Edelgard. Those two other actions tie in with a grayer anti-hero, but not this one. If Hanneman really says this line, it was a terrible idea on the writers’ part.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
Look, I get it. When it comes to morality, Edelgard isn’t exactly Superman or Captain America, or Marth and Chrom if we use Fire Emblem. Even on Crimson Flower, she still actively conquers the neutral Alliance. I get that. But this throwaway line would take it to a whole other level for Crimson Flower Edelgard. If Hanneman really says this line, it was a terrible idea on the writers’ part.
to:
Look, I get it. When it comes to morality, Edelgard isn’t exactly Superman or Captain America, or Marth and Chrom if we use Fire Emblem examples. Even on Crimson Flower, she still actively conquers the neutral Alliance. I get that. But this throwaway line would take it to a whole other level for Crimson Flower Edelgard. If Hanneman really says this line, it was a terrible idea on the writers’ part.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
…yes, it’s a stretch, I’ll admit it myself. But I don’t know how else to explain this line as I can’t understand why the fuck the game developers would include this line on the route where you side with Edelgard. If Hanneman really says this line, it was a terrible idea on the writers’ part.
to:
…yes, it’s a stretch, I’ll admit it myself. But I don’t know how else to explain this line as I can’t understand why the fuck the game developers would include this line on the route where you side with Edelgard.
Look, I get it. When it comes to morality, Edelgard isn’t exactly Superman or Captain America, or Marth and Chrom if we use Fire Emblem. Even on Crimson Flower, she still actively conquers the neutral Alliance. I get that. But this throwaway line would take it to a whole other level for Crimson Flower Edelgard. If Hanneman really says this line, it was a terrible idea on the writers’ part.
Look, I get it. When it comes to morality, Edelgard isn’t exactly Superman or Captain America, or Marth and Chrom if we use Fire Emblem. Even on Crimson Flower, she still actively conquers the neutral Alliance. I get that. But this throwaway line would take it to a whole other level for Crimson Flower Edelgard. If Hanneman really says this line, it was a terrible idea on the writers’ part.
