Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History Main / MurderIntoMalevolence

Go To

Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Is anyone else getting the message \
to:
Is anyone else getting the message \\\"Sorry, You cannot insert HTML into the Source Editor\\\" whenever they try to edit this page? It\\\'s been happening to me ever since the new website design, and I\\\'m not doing anything wrong.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Well, Hollows don't become evil on the basis of them being murdered. They become evil on the basis of their ghosts being trapped too long in the mortal world. If they don't reach Soul Society in time, their chain of fate degrades into nothing, triggering the corruption. What they become depends on whatever lingering emotion they have (greed, depression, love, hunger, etc.). The all-consuming soul-hunger takes it shape based on that linger emotion, but the point is that the gentlest death in the world can result in a Hollow forming -- not because of the way the person died, but because the person was trapped too long in the mortal world after death.
to:
Well, Hollows don\'t become evil on the basis of them being murdered. They become evil on the basis of their ghosts being trapped too long in the mortal world. If they don\'t reach Soul Society in time, their chain of fate degrades into nothing, triggering the corruption. What they become depends on whatever lingering emotion they have (greed, depression, love, hunger, etc.). The all-consuming soul-hunger takes it shape based on that linger emotion, but the point is that the gentlest death in the world can result in a Hollow forming -- not because of the way the person died, but because the person was trapped too long in the mortal world after death.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
The only example we have for certain where the nature of the death definitely created something horrible afterwards, is how the young child and Shrieker died. The child was forced into an evil servitude but did not itself become evil. The type of Hollow that Shrieker became was very much dictated by the nature of his death. It wasn't the serial killer bit that mattered. It was the fact that his Hollow form only killed by using the child as a lure -- which a Hollow doesn't need to do, but which Shrieker needed to do to obtain eternal vengeance against the child that caused his death. He was no longer killing for his own glory (which is what he was doing in life), he was killing to torture the child that he blamed for his death.
to:
The only example we have for certain where the nature of the death definitely created something horrible afterwards, is how the young child and Shrieker died. The child was forced into an evil servitude but did not itself become evil. The type of Hollow that Shrieker became was very much dictated by the nature of his death. It wasn\'t the serial killer bit that mattered. It was the fact that his Hollow form only killed by using the child as a lure -- which a Hollow doesn\'t need to do, but which Shrieker needed to do to obtain eternal vengeance against the child that caused his death. He was no longer killing for his own glory (which is what he was doing in life), he was killing to torture the child that he blamed for his death.
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
If Shrieker is not an example of this trope, then there is no example from Bleach because Hollows don't fit the trope.
to:
If Shrieker is not an example of this trope, then there is no example from Bleach because Hollows (generically) don\'t fit the trope.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Well, Hollows don't become evil on the basis of them being murdered. They become evil on the basis of their ghosts being trapped too long in the mortal world. If they don't reach Soul Society in time, their chain of fate degrades into nothing, triggering the corruption. What they become depends on whatever lingering emotion they have (greed, depression, love, hunger, etc.). The all-consuming soul-hunger takes it shape based on that linger emotion, but the point is that the gentlest death in the world can result in a Hollow forming -- not because of the way the person died, but because the person was trapped too long in the mortal world after death.
to:
Well, Hollows don\'t become evil on the basis of them being murdered. They become evil on the basis of their ghosts being trapped too long in the mortal world. If they don\'t reach Soul Society in time, their chain of fate degrades into nothing, triggering the corruption. What they become depends on whatever lingering emotion they have (greed, depression, love, hunger, etc.). The all-consuming soul-hunger takes it shape based on that linger emotion, but the point is that the gentlest death in the world can result in a Hollow forming -- not because of the way the person died, but because the person was trapped too long in the mortal world after death.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
The only example we have for certain where the nature of the death definitely created something horrible afterwards, is how the young child and Shrieker died. The child was forced into an evil servitude but did not itself become evil. The type of Hollow that Shrieker became was very much dictated by the nature of his death. It wasn't the serial killer bit that mattered. It was the fact that his Hollow form only killed by using the child as a lure -- which a Hollow doesn't need to do, but which Shrieker needed to do to obtain eternal vengeance against the child that caused his death. He was no longer killing for his own glory (which is what he was doing in life), he was killing to torture the child that he blamed for his death.
to:
The only example we have for certain where the nature of the death definitely created something horrible afterwards, is how the young child and Shrieker died. The child was forced into an evil servitude but did not itself become evil. The type of Hollow that Shrieker became was very much dictated by the nature of his death. It wasn\'t the serial killer bit that mattered. It was the fact that his Hollow form only killed by using the child as a lure -- which a Hollow doesn\'t need to do, but which Shrieker needed to do to obtain eternal vengeance against the child that caused his death. He was no longer killing for his own glory (which is what he was doing in life), he was killing to torture the child that he blamed for his death.

If Shrieker is not an example of this trope, then there is no example from Bleach because Hollows don\'t fit the trope.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Well, Hollows don't become evil on the basis of them being murdered. They become evil on the basis of their ghosts being trapped too long in the mortal world. If they don't reach Soul Society in time, their chain of fate degrades into nothing, triggering the corruption. What they become depends on whatever lingering emotion they have (greed, depression, love, hunger, etc.). The all-consuming soul-hunger takes it shape based on that linger emotion, but the point is that the gentlest death in the world can result in a Hollow forming -- not because of the way the person died, but because the person was trapped too long in the mortal world after death.
to:
Well, Hollows don\'t become evil on the basis of them being murdered. They become evil on the basis of their ghosts being trapped too long in the mortal world. If they don\'t reach Soul Society in time, their chain of fate degrades into nothing, triggering the corruption. What they become depends on whatever lingering emotion they have (greed, depression, love, hunger, etc.). The all-consuming soul-hunger takes it shape based on that linger emotion, but the point is that the gentlest death in the world can result in a Hollow forming -- not because of the way the person died, but because the person was trapped too long in the mortal world after death.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
The only example we have for certain where the nature of the death definitely created something horrible afterwards, is how the young child and Shrieker died. The child was forced into an evil servitude but did not itself become evil. The type of Hollow that Shrieker became was very much dictated by the nature of his death. It wasn't the serial killer bit that mattered. It was the fact that his Hollow form only killed by using the child as a lure -- which a Hollow doesn't need to do, but which Shrieker needed to do to obtain eternal vengeance against the child that caused his death.
to:
The only example we have for certain where the nature of the death definitely created something horrible afterwards, is how the young child and Shrieker died. The child was forced into an evil servitude but did not itself become evil. The type of Hollow that Shrieker became was very much dictated by the nature of his death. It wasn\'t the serial killer bit that mattered. It was the fact that his Hollow form only killed by using the child as a lure -- which a Hollow doesn\'t need to do, but which Shrieker needed to do to obtain eternal vengeance against the child that caused his death. He was no longer killing for his own glory (which is what he was doing in life), he was killing to torture the child that he blamed for his death.
Top