Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History YMMV / Bleach

Go To

[009] Mattwo Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
How is this a SequelSeries? Sophia the First isn't over after the events of the movie. In fact one of the episodes in season 3 takes place after it. It should be consider a {{Spinoff}} on account of the Amulet of Avalor. The page on spinoffs even says sometimes spinoffs are done with concepts. It also says that a [[TheVerse shared continuity]] is all that is needed for something to be considered one.
to:
How is this a SequelSeries? Sophia the First isn\'t over after the events of the movie. In fact one of the episodes in season 3 takes place after it. It should be consider a {{Spinoff}} on account of the Amulet of Avalor. The page on spinoffs even says sometimes spinoffs are done with concepts. It also says that a [[TheVerse shared continuity]] is all that is needed for something to be considered one.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
After all, for example, PowerRangers series (which always gets mistakenly labeled as seasons) usually have the same continuity but often nothing else connecting them outside of the concept of the Power Rangers themselves.
to:
After all, for example, PowerRangers series (which always gets mistakenly labeled as seasons) usually (recent spinoff series like Dino Charge and Samurai have been bad about this) have the same continuity but often nothing else connecting them outside of the concept of the Power Rangers themselves.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
I'm only starting this discussion instead of editing the pages because so many people these days use words and phrases like CGI, traditional animation, season and series wrong that I feel like I'd just get into an edit war.
to:
I\'m only starting this discussion instead of editing the pages because so many people these days use words and phrases like CGI, traditional animation, season and series wrong that I feel like I\'d just get into an edit war.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
How is this a SequelSeries? Sophia the First isn't over after the events of the movie. In fact one of the episodes in season 3 takes place after it. It should be consider a {{Spinoff}} on account of the Amulet of Avalor. The page on spinoffs even says sometimes spinoffs are done with concepts. It also says that a [[TheVerse shared continuity]] is all that is needed for something to be considered one.
to:
How is this a SequelSeries? Sophia the First isn\'t over after the events of the movie. In fact one of the episodes in season 3 takes place after it. It should be consider a {{Spinoff}} on account of the Amulet of Avalor. The page on spinoffs even says sometimes spinoffs are done with concepts. It also says that a [[TheVerse shared continuity]] is all that is needed for something to be considered one.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
I'm only starting this discussion instead of editing the pages because so many people these days use words like season and series wrong that I feel like I'd just get into an edit war.
to:
I\'m only starting this discussion instead of editing the pages because so many people these days use words and phrases like CGI, traditional animation, season and series wrong that I feel like I\'d just get into an edit war.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
How is this a SequelSeries? Sophia the First isn't over after the events of the movie. In fact one of the episodes in season 3 takes place after it. It should be consider a {{Spinoff}} on account of the Amulet of Avalor. The page on spinoffs even says sometimes spinoffs are done with concepts. It also says that a [[TheVerse shared continuity]] is all that is needed for something to be considered one.
to:
How is this a SequelSeries? Sophia the First isn\'t over after the events of the movie. In fact one of the episodes in season 3 takes place after it. It should be consider a {{Spinoff}} on account of the Amulet of Avalor. The page on spinoffs even says sometimes spinoffs are done with concepts. It also says that a [[TheVerse shared continuity]] is all that is needed for something to be considered one.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
to:

I\'m only starting this discussion instead of editing the pages because so many people these days use words like season and series wrong that I feel like I\'d just get into an edit war.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
How is this a SequelSeries? Sophia the First isn't over after the events of the movie. In fact one of the episodes in season 3 takes place after it. It should be consider a {{Spinoff}} on account of the Amulet of Avalor. The page on spinoffs even says sometimes spinoffs are done with concepts. It also says that a [[TheVerse shared continuity]] is all that is needed for something to be considered one.
to:
How is this a SequelSeries? Sophia the First isn\'t over after the events of the movie. In fact one of the episodes in season 3 takes place after it. It should be consider a {{Spinoff}} on account of the Amulet of Avalor. The page on spinoffs even says sometimes spinoffs are done with concepts. It also says that a [[TheVerse shared continuity]] is all that is needed for something to be considered one.

After all, for example, PowerRangers series (which always gets mistakenly labeled as seasons) usually have the same continuity but often nothing else connecting them outside of the concept of the Power Rangers themselves.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
How is this a SequelSeries? Sophia the First isn't over after the events of the movie. In fact one of the episodes in season 3 takes place after it. It should be consider a {{Spinoff}} on account of the Amulet of Avalor. The page on spinoffs even says sometimes spinoffs are done with concepts. It also says that a shared continuity is all that is needed for something to be considered one.
to:
How is this a SequelSeries? Sophia the First isn\'t over after the events of the movie. In fact one of the episodes in season 3 takes place after it. It should be consider a {{Spinoff}} on account of the Amulet of Avalor. The page on spinoffs even says sometimes spinoffs are done with concepts. It also says that a [[TheVerse shared continuity]] is all that is needed for something to be considered one.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
How is this a SequelSeries? Sophia the First isn't over after the events of the movie. In fact one of the episodes in season 3 takes place after it. It should be consider a {{Spinoff}} on account of the Amulet of Avalor. The page on spinoffs even says sometimes spinoffs are done with concepts.
to:
How is this a SequelSeries? Sophia the First isn\'t over after the events of the movie. In fact one of the episodes in season 3 takes place after it. It should be consider a {{Spinoff}} on account of the Amulet of Avalor. The page on spinoffs even says sometimes spinoffs are done with concepts. It also says that a shared continuity is all that is needed for something to be considered one.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
How is this a [[Sequel Series]]? Sophia the First isn't over after the events of the movie. In fact one of the episodes in season 3 takes place after it. It should be consider a {{Spinoff}} on account of the Amulet of Avalor. The page on spinoffs even says sometimes spinoffs are done with concepts.
to:
How is this a SequelSeries? Sophia the First isn\'t over after the events of the movie. In fact one of the episodes in season 3 takes place after it. It should be consider a {{Spinoff}} on account of the Amulet of Avalor. The page on spinoffs even says sometimes spinoffs are done with concepts.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
How is this a Sequel? Sophia the First isn't over after the events of the movie. In fact one of the episodes in season 3 takes place after it. It should be consider a spinoff on account of the Amulet of Avalor.
to:
How is this a [[Sequel Series]]? Sophia the First isn\'t over after the events of the movie. In fact one of the episodes in season 3 takes place after it. It should be consider a {{Spinoff}} on account of the Amulet of Avalor. The page on spinoffs even says sometimes spinoffs are done with concepts.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
It's true a hollowfication form was seen while Ichigo was fighting his inner Hollow, but the reptilian shape of it threw fans for a loop at the time it happened - the reptilian shape not only didn't fit in with the humanoid hollow mask Ichigo kept manifesting, but it didn't fit in with the humanoid inner Hollow Ichigo kept talking to either. However, the Visoreds were also confused about what they were fighting, as Ichigo's Hollowfication was clearly somehow different to their own experiences. The inner Hollow was saying things that also didn't gel with the Visoreds, and which caused questions in the fandom at the time - such as the inner Hollow stating it and Old Man Zangetsu were originally one being, that a balance of power kept shifting between them, and that the inner Hollow kept stating it was Zangetsu. The fight left it absolutely clear that we didn't know the full truth of the Ichigo's Hollowification, that this would be revisited at a future date and that should Ichigo ever verge on death something very dramatic would happen regarding his Hollowfication. That all spawned WMG at the time that never stopped until the truth finally came out years later.
to:
It\'s true a hollowfication form was seen while Ichigo was fighting his inner Hollow, but the reptilian shape of it threw fans for a loop at the time it happened - the reptilian shape not only didn\'t fit in with the humanoid hollow mask Ichigo kept manifesting, but it didn\'t fit in with the humanoid inner Hollow Ichigo kept talking to either. However, the Visoreds were also confused about what they were fighting, as Ichigo\'s Hollowfication was clearly somehow different to their own experiences.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
In the meantime, his Hollow mask kept evolving with every power up and new battle experience, and the story made it clear that Hollow evolution did take Hollows from bestial forms to humanoid forms. So, when Ichigo's inner Hollow did finally manifest against Ulquiorra, it was after several Hollow mask evolutions and seemed to fit the bestial-to-humanoid theme of Hollow evolution. If anything, even though the new form did raise questions, fans had more problems with the reptilian form than the humanoid form.
to:
The inner Hollow was saying things that also didn\'t gel with the Visoreds, and which caused questions in the fandom at the time - such as the inner Hollow stating it and Old Man Zangetsu were originally one being, that a balance of power kept shifting between them, and that the inner Hollow kept stating it was Zangetsu. The fight left it absolutely clear that we didn\'t know the full truth of the Ichigo\'s Hollowification, that this would be revisited at a future date and that should Ichigo ever verge on death something very dramatic would happen regarding his Hollowfication. That all spawned WMG at the time that never stopped until the truth finally came out years later.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
I can see from your post that the foreshadowing did not unfold in the way you had anticipated, but that doesn't change the existence of foreshadowing. Foreshadowing isn't a map that explains every little detail before it happens, and the trope isn't about whether the foreshadowing is considered good or bad. If foreshadowing exists, it's not an Ass Pull.
to:
In the meantime, his Hollow mask kept evolving with every power up and new battle experience, and the story made it clear that Hollow evolution did take Hollows from bestial forms to humanoid forms. So, when Ichigo\'s inner Hollow did finally manifest against Ulquiorra, it was after several Hollow mask evolutions and seemed to fit the bestial-to-humanoid theme of Hollow evolution. If anything, even though the new form did raise questions, fans had more problems with the reptilian form than the humanoid form.

I can see from your post that the foreshadowing did not unfold in the way you had anticipated, but that doesn\'t change the existence of foreshadowing. Foreshadowing isn\'t a map that explains every little detail before it happens, and the trope isn\'t about whether the foreshadowing is considered good or bad. If foreshadowing exists, it\'s not an Ass Pull.
Top