Follow TV Tropes

Ask The Tropers

Go To

Have a question about how the TVTropes wiki works? No one knows this community better than the people in it, so ask away! Ask the Tropers is the page you come to when you have a question burning in your brain and the support pages didn't help. It's not for everything, though. For a list of all the resources for your questions, click here. You can also go to this Directory thread for ongoing cleanup projects.

Ask the Tropers:

Trope Related Question:

Make Private (For security bugs or stuff only for moderators)

TheNerfGuy Since: Mar, 2011
24th Oct, 2016 08:05:45 AM

I should point out that both of you are technically Edit Warring over this.

Ramona122003 Since: Jan, 2001
24th Oct, 2016 08:08:19 AM

I didn't edit war. I just said Buu threatened the entire universe, which he did and several characters said it in the manga. The original line was that Buu could destroy the universe, which was what Forenperser protested.

Basically, semantics. I honored what he wrote by not putting the original line back, but I did give context on how dangerous Buu was.

Edited by Ramona122003
ZeroL Since: Jul, 2016
26th Oct, 2016 08:35:40 AM

It isn't really an edit war because of the illegal image. This issue needs more attention.

My new plan is so secret that even I cannot understand its full scope!
Larkmarn Since: Nov, 2010
26th Oct, 2016 09:01:58 AM

Wait, what? Why does the image have anything to do with anything?

Anyhoo, As far as I know, Super is considered canon to the Manga. Filler, movies (other than YSGAHFR, BOTG, and RF), and GT aren't canon.

And yes, Ramona, you did edit-war. But you did report it here not... too... long after you edit-warred so I don't think it's a huge deal. I do have to take issue with how passive-aggressive your ATT topic was, though. You didn't come here to resolve an issue, you came here to sic the mods on someone you disagree with. He even offered a very fine compromise (changing the context to something accurate for both the anime and manga) which you rejected. Which honestly sounds like a page-ownership issue.

Edited by Larkmarn Found a Youtube Channel with political stances you want to share? Hop on over to this page and add them.
Ramona122003 Since: Jan, 2001
26th Oct, 2016 04:16:12 PM

I didn't reject it at all. All I said was Buu threatened the universe, when the original point was that Buu could destroy the universe, which the other troper called 'filler nonsense'.

Also, Super does use some filler from the anime. It's actually closer to Kai and Kai said Buu can destroy the universe if you want to be specific. And my point was that something can't be deleted on the basics of it being 'filler'.

Edited by Ramona122003
Candi Since: Aug, 2012
26th Oct, 2016 07:51:34 PM

Illegal images or plagarized texts are a free action to remove, since they could get the wiki in trouble.

The rest of it is edit-warring and gets reported toot-sweet. That's beyond sending a PM

Coming back to where you started is not the same as never leaving. -Terry Pratchett
Larkmarn Since: Nov, 2010
27th Oct, 2016 05:31:35 AM

Did you look at the history? The illegal image was never added to the page, it was in an edit reason.

So here's the timeline:

  • Forenperser changed the wording to delete some context calling it "filler nonsense."
  • Ramona immediately changed it back (this is where it became an edit war)
  • Forenperser changed it to something that is equally true in the manga and anime. His edit reason included a hotlinked image.
  • Ramona then changed it to something that implies the original, contested text.

Honestly, I'm fine with the current wording, but rather dissatisfied with how we got there.

Edited by Larkmarn Found a Youtube Channel with political stances you want to share? Hop on over to this page and add them.
Candi Since: Aug, 2012
27th Oct, 2016 08:58:03 AM

I personally don't see the difference between removing a link or the image/words themselves. It still has to go.

And looking at edit histories on my phone is a pain precisely because I miss things.

Edit: Nevermind, I'm a dingbat. >.<

Edited by Candi Coming back to where you started is not the same as never leaving. -Terry Pratchett
Larkmarn Since: Nov, 2010
27th Oct, 2016 12:03:08 PM

I'm afraid I don't follow. The image in question was never on the page but the troper included a link to the image in his edit-reason. And to address Zero L's point, this was after the edit war had started so it doesn't somehow negate the fact that Ramona started the edit war... not that it would anyway, since Ramona's edits didn't do anything to remove the image.

Edited by Larkmarn Found a Youtube Channel with political stances you want to share? Hop on over to this page and add them.
Ramona122003 Since: Jan, 2001
27th Oct, 2016 05:13:59 PM

I didn't start the edit war. I put the original edit back because I came here over a year ago and asked if an entry can be erased or altered if it was filler material. It was said that it can't since filler is still part of the work, so I put the original edit back because the reason for the text being deleted 'filler nonsense', wasn't a valid reason and I put it in the edit notes. It was also the first edit I did for that entry.

TheNerfGuy Since: Mar, 2011
27th Oct, 2016 05:43:23 PM

It doesn't matter who starts the edit war. It's who participated that really matters.

Top