His personality is slowly shifting to balance the changes in Lil' E's. Eventually the devil kid we knew and loved will be reborn in Seymour's body.
This is exactly the same comic as yesterday, only in four panels instead of twelve. That's just lazy.
Well, we get a sort of pun on Liberty's name?
.....Yeah, that's not much is it
Sure the show's stupid but it's bright, fun, and you see grown men get punched in the face multiple times an episode. What's not to like?Look the only Liberty I want right now is Liberty Prime.
There is nothing that can't be solved by a giant robot that tosses nuclear bombs like footballs and practically shouts anti-communist propaganda.
Considering I'm playing through Fallout 4 right now, I enjoyed that very much. That's what Sinfest needs. Someone's gotta download Liberty Prime's core directives and personality matrix into all the fembots. Then add targeting parameters saying that the Sisterhood are Communists.
Please stop. The fact that'll never happen makes me so sad.
Well.
I've heard of Fallout for a while now, since Fallout 3 was still new.
But I never knew that Liberty Prime was ever a thing.
How did I miss it?
Well, just saw the Peanuts movie and all I can say is that it's time the infamous 7/11/12 strip gets the good old fashioned Never Live It Down treatment for the SJW crowd that backed it up. Edward, you know what to do.
The film expands more on The Red Haired Girl. She actually greatly respects Charlie Brown as a good person. This means that the depiction as a creepy stalker is flat out wrong as its not based on canon.
That comic was already in that region for me, given the sheer amount of love and respect I have for Charles Schulz and Peanuts in general.
Ain't NOBODY allowed to talk shit about them around me.
At first, I didn't know what you were talking about, but then I realized "oh yeah, Tats did one where Charlie Brown was accused as a stalker by Xanthe."
Can't believe I forgot that one.
Man, Tats must've been really embarrassed when he actually saw the movie (assuming that he did).
Eh, he probably assumed the writers were enforcing the patriarchy by having her find Charlie Brown's "stalking" charming instead of disturbing.
The movie explains the behaviour as timidity and lack of confidence, which is actually perfectly in character for Chuck.
Shall the Sinfest forums have this truth put in front of their faces via friendly truthful reveals?
If they did, they'd probably yell about mansplaining or something like that.
Even I think that'd be a dumb move.
Oh look, it's good old Year Man.
edited 30th Nov '15 10:49:46 PM by MarqFJA
Fiat iustitia, et pereat mundus.Makes me wonder whether the Sisterhood will come after him next.
They never came after him in the previous years. Heck, they seem to be quite amicable to him.
Fiat iustitia, et pereat mundus.At least we can count on him taking attention off of the others towards the end of the year.
As for Charlie Brown, I've yet to see the movie, but it's nice that they actually deal with that and, at the same time, blow it up right in The Sisterhood's offending face.
So same gag as last year then.
I just find it funny that you guys are so offended by Peanuts joke that you still remember it three year afterwards xD
It was one more put down in a long series of them that said character never deserved, while more deserving female characters (In this case Sally and Lucy) once again go unpunished. It was basically the football game from "It's your first Kiss Charlie Brown" all over again, but in an attempt to make a political point via Tats' pet character.
Plus, SOMEONE has to keep track of all this nonsense, and it's been shown time and again it sure as hell ain't gonna be Tats
I wonder if 2015 will be dead by 2017 this time.
He's busy having his sinful crush on Jesus.