Follow TV Tropes

Following

O'Donnell questions separation of church, state

Go To

Pentadragon The Blank from Alternia Since: Jan, 2001
#1: Oct 19th 2010 at 4:28:19 PM

I am beyond words.

There are no words in the English language to articulate just how I feel right now.

WILMINGTON, Del. — Republican Christine O'Donnell challenged her Democratic rival Tuesday to show where the Constitution requires separation of church and state, drawing swift criticism from her opponent, laughter from her law school audience and a quick defense from prominent conservatives.

"Where in the Constitution is separation of church and state?" O'Donnell asked while Democrat Chris Coons, an attorney, sat a few feet away.

Coons responded that O'Donnell's question "reveals her fundamental misunderstanding of what our Constitution is. ... The First Amendment establishes a separation."

She interrupted to say, "The First Amendment does? ... So you're telling me that the separation of church and state, the phrase 'separation of church and state,' is in the First Amendment?"

Her campaign issued a statement later saying O'Donnell "was not questioning the concept of separation of church and state as subsequently established by the courts. She simply made the point that the phrase appears nowhere in the Constitution."

Conservative commentator Rush Limbaugh made the same point in his radio program soon after the debate, saying, "There's nothing in the Constitution about separation of church and state."

The controversy was the latest to befall O'Donnell in a race where she trails badly in the polls against Coons.

Coons is a county executive nominated by the Democrats for the seat held for years by Vice President Joe Biden. O'Donnell, with strong Tea Party support, burst into the national spotlight by winning the Republican primary over a longtime GOP congressman.

The subject of religion and the law came up during their debate at Widener University Law School as O'Donnell criticized Coons for saying that teaching creationism in public school would violate the Constitution.

Coons said private and parochial schools are free to teach creationism — O'Donnell used the term "intelligent design" — but that under the "indispensable principle" of separation of church and state "religious doctrine doesn't belong in our public schools."

He said the separation of church and state was one of a number of "settled pieces of constitutional law" worked out through years of legal development including Supreme Court decisions. He said a woman's right to abortion was another.

He noted again the First Amendment's ban on establishment of religion.

"That's in the First Amendment?" she said, smiling.

Both candidates suggested that the exchange showed the other didn't understand the Constitution.

Origin of 'separation of church and state' The First Amendment states: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

The phrase "separation of church and state" is usually traced to President Thomas Jefferson. In a letter in 1802, he referred to the First Amendment and said that it built "a wall of separation between Church & State."

The relationship of government and religion continues to be debated in American law. Many argue that the First Amendment's reference to religion involves the establishment of any particular religion, an important concern to the American colonists, not a ban on all involvement between religion and government.

O'Donnell's comments, in a debate aired on radio station WDEL, created a stir in the audience.

"You actually audibly heard the crowd gasp," Widener University political scientist Wesley Leckrone said after the debate.

Erin Daly, a Widener professor who specializes in constitutional law, said, "She seemed genuinely surprised that the principle of separation of church and state derives from the First Amendment, and I think to many of us in the law school that was a surprise."

During the debate, O'Donnell argued that Coons' views on teaching of theories other evolution showed that he believes in big-government mandates.

"Talk about imposing your beliefs on the local schools," she said. "You've just proved how little you know not just about constitutional law but about the theory of evolution."

Coons said evolution was science, creationism a religious doctrine.

O'Donnell upset Delaware's Republican establishment last month with her victory in the primary, and former George W. Bush adviser Karl Rove has predicted she will cost the party a Senate seat.

Money has been pouring into her campaign from across the country — she raised nearly $4 million in just over a month through the end of September — but she has recently criticized the Republican establishment for not spending more to help.

edited 19th Oct '10 4:33:02 PM by Pentadragon

Tzetze DUMB from a converted church in Venice, Italy Since: Jan, 2001
DUMB
#2: Oct 19th 2010 at 4:32:11 PM

Ow.

Other words and phrases not appearing: "freedom", "God", "small government" or "big government".

I vote that we outlaw all four!

edited 19th Oct '10 4:32:30 PM by Tzetze

[1] This facsimile operated in part by synAC.
JosefBugman Since: Nov, 2009
#3: Oct 19th 2010 at 4:39:01 PM

Wow, so she is completly and totally mental.

Fighteer Lost in Space from The Time Vortex (Time Abyss) Relationship Status: TV Tropes ruined my love life
MajorTom Eye'm the cutest! Since: Dec, 2009 Relationship Status: Barbecuing
Eye'm the cutest!
#5: Oct 19th 2010 at 6:05:11 PM

Technically the US Constitution doesn't say church and state are separate.

What it does say is the Congress (and thus by implication the Government) cannot promote or deny any particular church/religion.

/Constitutionalism

"Allah may guide their bullets, but Jesus helps those who aim down the sights."
Acebrock He/Him from So-Cal Since: Dec, 2009 Relationship Status: My elf kissing days are over
He/Him
#7: Oct 19th 2010 at 6:16:34 PM

How did someone so...dumb get to be the republican candidate in Deleware?

edit: why does the link keep coming up wrong?

edited 19th Oct '10 6:18:34 PM by Acebrock

My troper wall
Jordan Azor Ahai from Westeros Since: Jan, 2001
Azor Ahai
#8: Oct 19th 2010 at 6:18:29 PM

@Tom- I assumed when I first read the headline that she was arguing pretty much that (that the First Amendment doesn't establish a "wall of separation"/doesn't literally say that), but the way she phrased it, she seemed completely ignorant of its content.

Hodor
MajorTom Eye'm the cutest! Since: Dec, 2009 Relationship Status: Barbecuing
Eye'm the cutest!
#9: Oct 19th 2010 at 6:19:05 PM

^^^ First Amendment of the United States Constitution:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech or of the press or of the right of the people peaceably to assemble and to petition the government for a redress of grievances

Where in that or anywhere else in the US Constitution does it explicitly say "Church and State are separate" or other similar wordings.

It doesn't. Separation of church and state is the implied extension of the First Amendment's restrictions on promoting or denying any religion.

I'm a Constitutionalist and Libertarian first, don't tell me I know nothing of the US Constitution.

edited 19th Oct '10 6:19:20 PM by MajorTom

"Allah may guide their bullets, but Jesus helps those who aim down the sights."
silver2195 Since: Jan, 2001
#10: Oct 19th 2010 at 6:23:11 PM

Separation of church and state is the implied extension of the First Amendment's restrictions on promoting or denying any religion.

True, but O'Donnell wasn't simply nitpicking here; she seems to read the Establishment Clause so narrowly as to render it pointless. And That's Terrible.

Currently taking a break from the site. See my user page for more information.
MajorTom Eye'm the cutest! Since: Dec, 2009 Relationship Status: Barbecuing
Eye'm the cutest!
#11: Oct 19th 2010 at 6:24:06 PM

Not an invalid opinion or logical conclusion. Just a bit odd with established tradition.

"Allah may guide their bullets, but Jesus helps those who aim down the sights."
silver2195 Since: Jan, 2001
#12: Oct 19th 2010 at 6:26:01 PM

Please define "invalid opinion." In a sense, virtually all opinions are VALID, but only a few are CORRECT.

Currently taking a break from the site. See my user page for more information.
Tzetze DUMB from a converted church in Venice, Italy Since: Jan, 2001
DUMB
#13: Oct 19th 2010 at 6:28:36 PM

Some day I'm going to come up with a completely insane governmental system that still technically fits within the bounds of the Constitution. It'll go nicely with the perversion of Christianity I'll come up with along with it.

[1] This facsimile operated in part by synAC.
mikefrombrooklyn Since: Dec, 1969
#14: Oct 19th 2010 at 6:40:51 PM

The constitution always says you have the right to wear sleeveless shirts if you want to go with a completely literal meaning.

silver2195 Since: Jan, 2001
#15: Oct 19th 2010 at 6:50:42 PM

Where does it say that?

Currently taking a break from the site. See my user page for more information.
TotemicHero No longer a forum herald from the next level Since: Dec, 2009
No longer a forum herald
#16: Oct 19th 2010 at 7:14:41 PM

The right to bare arms, of course.

It would probably help if the joke didn't depend on the alternate spelling...

Expergiscēre cras, medior quam hodie. (Awaken tomorrow, better than today.)
jewelleddragon Also known as Katz from Pasadena, CA Since: Apr, 2009
Also known as Katz
#17: Oct 19th 2010 at 8:42:31 PM

Dude, Tom, stop quoting at us. We know what it says.

Coons quoted those exact 16 words at O'Donnell and she replied by saying "That's in there?"

EnglishIvy Since: Aug, 2011
#18: Oct 19th 2010 at 9:28:08 PM

I love it when people rules lawyer the constitution.

RhymeBeat Bird mom from Eastern Standard Since: Aug, 2009 Relationship Status: In Lesbians with you
Bird mom
#19: Oct 19th 2010 at 9:32:44 PM

EDIT sorry misread.

And yes O'Donnel really isn't helping herself. I knew the contents of the First amendment in Grade School.

edited 19th Oct '10 9:34:48 PM by RhymeBeat

The Crystal Caverns A bird's gotta sing.
EnglishIvy Since: Aug, 2011
#20: Oct 19th 2010 at 9:35:44 PM

Disregard.

edited 19th Oct '10 9:36:04 PM by EnglishIvy

deathjavu This foreboding is fa... from The internet, obviously Since: Feb, 2010
This foreboding is fa...
#21: Oct 19th 2010 at 10:13:48 PM

While what she said is true in a literal sense, it's definitely both against the spirit of the law and established tradition. So still quite frightening.

Look, you can't make me speak in a logical, coherent, intelligent bananna.
Lanceleoghauni Cyborg Helmsman from Z or R Twice Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: In my bunk
#22: Oct 19th 2010 at 10:33:39 PM

But, But, PRECEDENT.

"Coffee! Coffeecoffeecoffee! Coffee! Not as strong as Meth-amphetamine, but it lets you keep your teeth!"
CommandoDude They see me troll'n from Cauhlefohrnia Since: Jun, 2010
They see me troll'n
#23: Oct 19th 2010 at 10:57:42 PM

This is making my head hurt SO HARD.

These people are just totally and willfully ignorant of the fact that is is (was) a secular nation, it was founded as such with the expectation that no religion in this country would be promoted or persecuted.

This was a revolutionary concept that no state had embraced before. WE WERE THE FIRST SECULARISTS.

My other signature is a Gundam.
jewelleddragon Also known as Katz from Pasadena, CA Since: Apr, 2009
Also known as Katz
#24: Oct 19th 2010 at 11:44:07 PM

OK people, no more saying that what she said is technically true or that it just goes against traditional interpretations.

Here's the vid; at 7:05 she says:

O'Donnell: Let me just clarify: you're telling me that the separation of church and state is found in the first amendment?

Coons: The government shall make no establishment of religion.

O'Donnell: That's in the first amendment?

This isn't a matter of interpretation. She. Doesn't. Know. The. Constitution. She doesn't know what it says. She also needs to be told what the 14th and 16th amendments say.

edited 19th Oct '10 11:45:07 PM by jewelleddragon

rjung Since: Jan, 2015
#25: Oct 20th 2010 at 12:02:58 AM

What's really hilarious is after she gets it wrong, the audience gasps in shock — and she grins and mugs for them as if she's just pulled off some super-awesome intellectual coup...

How did someone so...dumb get to be the republican candidate in Deleware?
Seems like after the 2008 election, the GOP candidate pool is a race to see who can out-moron Sarah Palin. Between Palin, Angle, O'Donnel, Rich Lott, and Joe Miller, it's a bumper-crop of derp.

—R.J.


Total posts: 141
Top